ang tibay vs cir, 69 phil. 635, february 27, 1940

7/24/2019 Ang Tibay vs CIR, 69 Phil. 635, February 27, 1940

1/5

Aberin, Azell Alexis F. July 2, 20121stYr.-Special Section Exercise No. 2 (LegalWriting)

G.R. No. L-46496 February 27 !94"

#NG $%' re(resente by $*R%&%* $E*+*R* ,anager an (ro(rietor an N#$%*N#LW*RER &R*$/ER/**+,petitioner

vs.$/E 0*1R$ *F %N+1$R%#L REL#$%*N an N#$%*N#L L#&*R 1N%*N %N0.respondents.

1. 0*1R$ *F %N+1$R%#L REL#$%*N3*WER.!e nature o" t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial

&elations an% o" its po'er is extensively %iscusse% in t!e %ecision.

2. $E0/N%0#L R1LE *F 3R*0E+1RE +1E 3R*0E *F L#W.!e #ourt o"

$n%ustrial &elations is not narro'ly constraine% by tec!nical rules o" proce%ure, an%

#oon'ealt! Act )o. 10* re+uires it to act accor%in to ustice an% e+uity an%

substantial erits o" t!e case, 'it!out rear% to tec!nicalities or leal evi%ence but ay

in"or its in% in suc! anner as it ay %ee ust an% e+uitable (oseco vs.#ourt o"

$n%ustrial &elations et al., . &. )o. /*. !e "act, !o'ever, t!at t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial

&elations ay be sai% to be "ree "ro t!e rii%ity o" certain proce%ural re+uireents

%oes not ean t!at it can, in usticiable cases coin be"ore it, entirely inore or

%isrear% t!e "un%aental an% essential re+uireents o" %ue process in trials an%

investiations o" an a%inistrative c!aracter.

*. 0#R+%N#L 3R%#R' R%G/$.!ere are car%inal priary ri!ts '!ic! ust be

respecte% even in procee%ins o" t!is c!aracter. !e 3rst o" t!ese ri!ts is t!e ri!t to a

!earin, '!ic! inclu%es t!e ri!t o" t!e party intereste% or a4ecte% to present !is o'n

case an% subit evi%ence in support t!ereo". )ot only ust t!e party be iven an

opportunity to present !is case an% to a%%uce evi%ence ten%in to establis! t!e ri!ts

'!ic! !e asserts but t!e tribunal must considert!e evi%ence presente%. 5!ile t!e %uty

to %eliberate %oes not ipose t!e obliation to %eci%e ri!t, it %oes iply a necessity

'!ic! cannot be %isrear%e%, naely, t!at o" !avin soet!in to support its %ecision.

)ot only ust t!ere be soe evi%ence to support a 3n%in or conclusion, but t!e

evi%ence ust be substantial. !e %ecision ust be ren%ere% on t!e evi%ence presente%at t!e !earin, or at least containe% in t!e recor% an% %isclose% to t!e parties a4ecte%.

!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations or any o" its u%es, t!ere"ore, ust act on its or !is o'n

in%epen%ent consi%eration o" t!e la' an% "acts o" t!e controversy, an% not siply accept

t!e vie's o" a subor%inate in arrivin at a %ecision. !e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations

s!oul%, in all controvercial +uestions, ren%er its %ecision in suc! a anner t!at t!e

parties to t!e procee%in can 6no' t!e various issues involve%, an% t!e reasons "or t!e

%ecisions ren%ere%. !e per"orance o" t!is %uty is inseparable "ro t!e aut!ority

con"erre% upon it.

/. 0#E #$ R NEW $R%#L GR#N$E+.$n t!e li!t o" t!e "oreoin "un%aental

principles, it is su7cient to observe !ere t!at, except as to t!e allee% areeentbet'een t!e An ibay an% t!e )ational 5or6ers8 9rot!er!oo% (appen%ix A, t!e recor%

is barren an% %oes not satis"y t!e t!irst "or a "actual basis upon '!ic! to pre%icate, in a

rational 'ay, a conclusion o" la'. !is result, !o'ever, %oes not no' preclu%e t!e

concession o" a ne' trial praye% "or by t!e respon%ent )ational :abor ;nion, $nc. !e

interest o" ustice 'oul% be better serve% i" t!e ovant is iven opportunity to present at

t!e !earin t!e %ocuents re"erre% to in !is otion an% suc! ot!er evi%ence as ay be


2/5

relevant to t!e ain issue involve%. !e leislation '!ic! create% t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial

&elations an% un%er '!ic! it acts is ne'. !e "ailure to rasp t!e "un%aental issue

involve% is not entirely attributable to t!e parties a%versely a4ecte% by t!e result.

Accor%inly, t!e otion "or a ne' trial s!oul% be, an% t!e sae is !ereby, rante%, an%

t!e entire recor% o" t!is case s!all be rean%e% to t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations, 'it!

instruction t!at it re-open t!e case, receive all suc! evi%ence as ay be relevant, an%ot!er'ise procee% in accor%ance 'it! t!e re+uireents set "ort! in t!e %ecision.

Ofce o the Solicitor-General Ozaeta and Assistant Attorney Barcelona or the Court o FirstInstance

Antonio . !a"uia or #ational $a%or &nionClaro '. (ecto or petitioner )An" *i%ay+

,ose '. Casal or #ational orers/ Brotherhood

) on otion "or reconsi%eration on otion "or ne' trial.

L#1RELJ.:

$#$EEN$ *F F#0$5!e respon%ent )ational :abor ;nion, $nc., on t!e ot!er !an%, prays "or t!e vacation o" t!e

u%eent ren%ere% by t!e aority o" t!is #ourt an% t!e rean%in o" t!e case to t!e #ourt o"

$n%ustrial &elations "or a ne' trial, an% avers?

1. !at oribio eo%oro@s clai t!at on Septeber 2, 1*B, t!ere 'as s!ortae o" leat!er solesin A) $9AY a6in it necessary "or !i to teporarily lay o4 t!e ebers o" t!e )ational:abor ;nion $nc., is entirely "alse an% unsupporte% by t!e recor%s o" t!e 9ureau o" #ustos

an% t!e 9oo6s o" Accounts o" native %ealers in leat!er.

2. !at t!e suppose% lac6 o" leat!er aterials claie% by oribio eo%oro 'as but a sc!ee tosysteatically prevent t!e "or"eiture o" t!is bon% %espite t!e breac! o" !is #>)&A# 'it!t!e C!ilippine Ary.

*. !at oribio eo%oro@s letter to t!e C!ilippine Ary %ate% Septeber 2, 1*B, (re suppose%%elay o" leat!er soles "ro t!e States 'as but a sc!ee to systeatically prevent t!e"or"eiture o" t!is bon% %espite t!e breac! o" !is #>)&A# 'it! t!e C!ilippine Ary.

/. !at t!e )ational 5or6er@s 9rot!er!oo% o" A) $9AY is a copany or eployer union%oinate% by oribio eo%oro, t!e existence an% "unctions o" '!ic! are illeal. (2B1 ;.S.,

D/B, petitioner@s printe% eoran%u, p. 2D.

D. !at in t!e exercise by t!e laborers o" t!eir ri!ts to collective barainin, aority rule an%elective representation are !i!ly essential an% in%ispensable. (Sections 2 an% D,#oon'ealt! Act )o. 21*.

. !at t!e century provisions o" t!e #ivil #o%e '!ic! !a% been (t!e principal source o"%issensions an% continuous civil 'ar in Spain cannot an% s!oul% not be a%e applicable ininterpretin an% applyin t!e salutary provisions o" a o%ern labor leislation o" Aericanoriin '!ere t!e in%ustrial peace !as al'ays been t!e rule.

. !at t!e eployer oribio eo%oro 'as uilty o" un"air labor practice "or %iscriinatinaainst t!e )ational :abor ;nion, $nc., an% unustly "avorin t!e )ational 5or6ers@9rot!er!oo%.

B. !at t!e ex!ibits !ereto attac!e% are so inaccessible to t!e respon%ents t!at even 'it! t!eexercise o" %ue %ilience t!ey coul% not be expecte% to !ave obtaine% t!e an% o4ere% asevi%ence in t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations.


3/5

. !at t!e attac!e% %ocuents an% ex!ibits are o" suc! "ar-reac!in iportance an% e4ect t!att!eir a%ission 'oul% necessarily ean t!e o%i3cation an% reversal o" t!e u%ent ren%ere%!erein.

!e petitioner, An ibay, !as 3le% an opposition bot! to t!e otion "or reconsi%eration o" t!erespon%ent )ational :abor ;nion, $nc.

$#$EEN$ *F $/E 0#E5

$n vie' o" t!e conclusion reac!e% by us an% to be !erein a"ter stea% 'it! re"erence to t!e

otion "or a ne' trial o" t!e respon%ent )ational :abor ;nion, $nc., 'e are o" t!e opinion t!at it is

not necessary to pass upon t!e otion "or reconsi%eration o" t!e Solicitor-eneral. 5e s!all

procee% to %ispose o" t!e otion "or ne' trial o" t!e respon%ent labor union. 9e"ore %oin t!is,

!o'ever, 'e %ee it necessary, in t!e interest o" or%erly proce%ure in cases o" t!is nature, in

interest o" or%erly proce%ure in cases o" t!is nature, to a6e several observations rear%in t!e

nature o" t!e po'ers o" t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations an% ep!asize certain ui%in principles

'!ic! s!oul% be observe% in t!e trial o" cases brou!t be"ore it. 5e !ave re-exaine% t!e entire

recor% o" t!e procee%ins !a% be"ore t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations in t!is case, an% 'e !ave

"oun% no substantial evi%ence t!at t!e exclusion o" t!e B laborers !ere 'as %ue to t!eir union

a7liation or activity. !e '!ole transcript ta6en contains '!at transpire% %urin t!e !earin an% is

ore o" a recor% o" contra%ictory an% conEictin stateents o" opposin counsel, 'it! spora%ic

conclusion %ra'n to suit t!eir o'n vie's. $t is evi%ent t!at t!ese stateents an% expressions o"vie's o" counsel !ave no evi%entiary value.

$#$EEN$ *F $/E %1E5

!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations is a special court '!ose "unctions are speci3cally state% int!e la' o" its creation (#oon'ealt! Act )o. 10*. $t is ore an a%inistrative t!an a part o" t!einterate% u%icial syste o" t!e nation. $t is not inten%e% to be a ere receptive oran o" t!eovernent. ;nli6e a court o" ustice '!ic! is essentially passive, actin only '!en its uris%iction isinvo6e% an% %eci%in only cases t!at are presente% to it by t!e parties litiant, t!e "unction o" t!e#ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations, as 'ill appear "ro perusal o" its oranic la', is ore active,a7rative an% %ynaic. $t not only exercises u%icial or +uasi-u%icial "unctions in t!e%eterination o" %isputes bet'een eployers an% eployees but its "unctions in t!e %eterination

o" %isputes bet'een eployers an% eployees but its "unctions are "ar ore copre!ensive an%expensive. $t !as uris%iction over t!e entire C!ilippines, to consi%er, investiate, %eci%e, an% settleany +uestion, atter controversy or %ispute arisin bet'een, an%or a4ectin eployers an%eployees or laborers, an% reulate t!e relations bet'een t!e, subect to, an% in accor%ance'it!, t!e provisions o" #oon'ealt! Act )o. 10* (section 1. $t s!all ta6e conizance or purposeso" prevention, arbitration, %ecision an% settleent, o" any in%ustrial or aricultural %ispute causinor li6ely to cause a stri6e or loc6out, arisin "ro %i4erences as rear%s 'aes, s!ares orcopensation, !ours o" labor or con%itions o" tenancy or eployent, bet'een lan%lor%s an%tenants or "ar-laborers, provi%e% t!at t!e nuber o" eployees, laborers or tenants o" "ar-laborers involve% excee%s t!irty, an% suc! in%ustrial or aricultural %ispute is subitte% to t!e#ourt by t!e Secretary o" :abor or by any or bot! o" t!e parties to t!e controversy an% certi3e% byt!e Secretary o" labor as existin an% proper to be by t!e Secretary o" :abor as existin an% properto be %ealt! 'it! by t!e #ourt "or t!e sa6e o" public interest. (Section /, i%id. $t s!all, be"ore!earin t!e %ispute an% in t!e course o" suc! !earin, en%eavor to reconcile t!e parties an% in%ucet!e to settle t!e %ispute by aicable areeent. (Cararap! 2, section /, i%id. 5!en %irecte% byt!e Cresi%ent o" t!e C!ilippines, it s!all investiate an% stu%y all in%ustries establis!e% in a%esinate% locality, 'it! a vie' to %eterinatin t!e necessity an% "airness o" 3xin an% a%optin"or suc! in%ustry or locality a iniu 'ae or s!are o" laborers or tenants, or a axiuGcanonH or rental to be pai% by t!e Gin+uilinosH or tenants or less to lan%o'ners. (Section D, i%id. $n3ne, it ay appeal to voluntary arbitration in t!e settleent o" in%ustrial %isputesI ay eploye%iation or conciliation "or t!at purpose, or recur to t!e ore e4ective syste o" o7cialinvestiation an% copulsory arbitration in or%er to %eterine speci3c controversies bet'een labor


4/5

an% capital in%ustry an% in ariculture. !ere is in reality !ere a inlin o" executive an% u%icial"unctions, '!ic! is a %eparture "ro t!e rii% %octrine o" t!e separation o" overnental po'ers.

$/E *3%N%*N5$n t!e case o" Goseco vs. Court o Industrial (elations et al., .&. )o. /*, proulate%

Septeber 1*, 1*, 'e !a% occasion to point out t!at t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations is not

narro'ly constraine% by tec!nical rules o" proce%ure, an% t!e Act re+uires it to Gact accor%in toustice an% e+uity an% substantial erits o" t!e case, 'it!out rear% to tec!nicalities or leal "ors

an% s!all not be boun% by any tec!nicalities or leal "ors an% s!all not be boun% by any tec!nical

rules o" leal evi%ence but ay in"or its in% in suc! anner as it ay %ee ust an% e+uitable.H

(Section 20, #oon'ealt! Act )o. 10*. $t s!all not be restricte% to t!e speci3c relie" claie% or

%ean%s a%e by t!e parties to t!e in%ustrial or aricultural %ispute, but ay inclu%e in t!e a'ar%,

or%er or %ecision any atter or %eterination '!ic! ay be %eee% necessary or expe%ient "or

t!e purpose o" settlin t!e %ispute or o" preventin "urt!er in%ustrial or aricultural %isputes.

(section 1*, i%id. An% in t!e li!t o" t!is leislative policy, appeals to t!is #ourt !ave been

especially reulate% by t!e rules recently proulate% by t!e rules recently proulate% by t!is

#ourt to carry into t!e e4ect t!e avo'e% leislative purpose. !e "act, !o'ever, t!at t!e #ourt o"

$n%ustrial &elations ay be sai% to be "ree "ro t!e rii%ity o" certain proce%ural re+uireents %oes

not ean t!at it can, in usti3able cases be"ore it, entirely inore or %isrear% t!e "un%aental an%

essential re+uireents o" %ue process in trials an% investiations o" an a%inistrative c!aracter.

$ere are (ri,ary rigts ic ,ust be res(ecte e8en in (roceeings o tis caracter5

(1 !e 3rst o" t!ese ri!ts is t!e ri!t to a !earin, '!ic! inclu%es t!e ri!t o" t!e partyintereste% or a4ecte% to present !is o'n case an% subit evi%ence in support t!ereo". $n t!elanuae o" #!ie" u!es, in 'or"an v. &.S., *0/ ;.S. 1, DB S. #t. *, , B2 :a'. e%.

112, Gt!e liberty an% property o" t!e citizen s!all be protecte% by t!e ru%ientaryre+uireents o" "air play.

(2 )ot only ust t!e party be iven an opportunity to present !is case an% to a%%uce evi%enceten%in to establis! t!e ri!ts '!ic! !e asserts but t!e tribunal must considert!e evi%encepresente%. (#!ie" Justice u!es in Koran v. ;.S. 2B ;.S. /B, D S. #t. 0, B0 la'. e%.12BB. $n t!e lanuae o" t!is court in 0d1ards vs. 'cCoy, 22 C!il., DB, Gt!e ri!t to a%%uceevi%ence, 'it!out t!e correspon%in %uty on t!e part o" t!e boar% to consi%er it, is vain.Suc! ri!t is conspicuously "utile i" t!e person or persons to '!o t!e evi%ence is presente%can t!rust it asi%e 'it!out notice or consi%eration.H

(* G5!ile t!e %uty to %eliberate %oes not ipose t!e obliation to %eci%e ri!t, it %oes iply anecessity '!ic! cannot be %isrear%e%, naely, t!at o" !avin soet!in to support it is anullity, a place '!en %irectly attac!e%.H (=%'ar%s vs. Kc#oy, supra. !is principle eanates"ro t!e ore "un%aental is contrary to t!e vestin o" unliite% po'er any'!ere. :a' isbot! a rant an% a liitation upon po'er.

(/ )ot only ust t!ere be soe evi%ence to support a 3n%in or conclusion (#ity o" Kanila vs.Austin, .&. )o. /DB//, proulate% )oveber 2, 1*, LLLM$ >. . 1**D, but t!eevi%ence ust be Gsubstantial.H (5as!inton, Mirinia an% Karylan% #oac! #o. v. nationallabor &elations 9oar%, *01 ;.S. 1/2, 1/, D S. #t. /B, D0, B1 :a'. e%. D. $t eans suc!relevant evi%ence as a reasonable in% accept as a%e+uate to support a conclusion.H(Appalac!ian =lectric Co'er v. )ational :abor &elations 9oar%, / #ir., * F. 2% BD, BI)ational :abor &elations 9oar% v. !opson Cro%ucts, #ir., F. 2% 1*, 1DI 9allston-Still'ater Nnittin #o. v. )ational :abor &elations 9oar%, 2 #ir., B F. 2% DB, 0. . . . !e

statute provi%es t!at Gt!e rules o" evi%ence prevailin in courts o" la' an% e+uity s!all notbe controllin.@ !e obvious purpose o" t!is an% siilar provisions is to "ree a%inistrativeboar%s "ro t!e copulsion o" tec!nical rules so t!at t!e ere a%ission o" atter '!ic!'oul% be %eee% incopetent inn u%icial procee%ins 'oul% not invali%ate t!ea%inistrative or%er. ($nterstate #oerce #oission v. 9air%, 1/ ;.S. 2D, //, 2/ S. #t.D*, DB, /B :a'. e%. B0I $nterstate #oerce #oission v. :ouisville an% )as!ville &.#o., 22 ;.S. BB, * ** S. #t. 1BD, 1B, D :a'. e%. /*1I ;nite% States v. Abilene an%Sout!ern &y. #o. S. #t. 220, 22D, / :a'. e%. 2/. 9ut t!is assurance o" a %esirable


5/5

Eexibility in a%inistrative proce%ure %oes not o "ar as to usti"y or%ers 'it!out a basis inevi%ence !avin rational probative "orce. Kere uncorroborate% !earsay or ruor %oes notconstitute substantial evi%ence. (#onsoli%ate% =%ison #o. v. )ational :abor &elations 9oar%,D S. #t. 20, B* :a'. e%. )o. /, A%v. >p., p. 1*1.H

(D !e %ecision ust be ren%ere% on t!e evi%ence presente% at t!e !earin, or at least

containe% in t!e recor% an% %isclose% to t!e parties a4ecte%. ($nterstate #oence#oission vs. :. O ). &. #o., 22 ;.S. BB, ** S. #t. 1BD, D :a'. e%. /*1. >nly by con3nint!e a%inistrative tribunal to t!e evi%ence %isclose% to t!e parties, can t!e latter beprotecte% in t!eir ri!t to 6no' an% eet t!e case aainst t!e. $t s!oul% not, !o'ever,%etract "ro t!eir %uty actively to see t!at t!e la' is en"orce%, an% "or t!at purpose, to uset!e aut!orize% leal et!o%s o" securin evi%ence an% in"orin itsel" o" "acts aterial an%relevant to t!e controversy. 9oar%s o" in+uiry ay be appointe% "or t!e purpose o"investiatin an% %eterinin t!e "acts in any iven case, but t!eir report an% %ecision areonly a%visory. (Section , #oon'ealt! Act )o. 10*. !e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations ayre"er any in%ustrial or aricultural %ispute or any atter un%er its consi%eration ora%viseent to a local boar% o" in+uiry, a provincial 3scal. a ustice o" t!e peace or any publico7cial in any part o" t!e C!ilippines "or investiation, report an% recoen%ation, an% ay%eleate to suc! boar% or public o7cial suc! po'ers an% "unctions as t!e sai% #ourt o"$n%ustrial &elations ay %ee necessary, but suc! %eleation s!all not a4ect t!e exercise o"t!e #ourt itsel" o" any o" its po'ers. (Section 10, i%id.

( !e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations or any o" its u%es, t!ere"ore, ust act on its or !is o'nin%epen%ent consi%eration o" t!e la' an% "acts o" t!e controversy, an% not siply acceptt!e vie's o" a subor%inate in arrivin at a %ecision. $t ay be t!at t!e volue o" 'or6 issuc! t!at it is literally &elations personally to %eci%e all controversies coin be"ore t!e. $nt!e ;nite% States t!e %i7culty is solve% 'it! t!e enactent o" statutory aut!orityaut!orizin exainers or ot!er subor%inates to ren%er 3nal %ecision, 'it! t!e ri!t to appealto boar% or coission, but in our case t!ere is no suc! statutory aut!ority.

( !e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations s!oul%, in all controversial +uestions, ren%er its %ecision insuc! a anner t!at t!e parties to t!e procee%in can 6no' t!e various issues involve%, an%t!e reasons "or t!e %ecision ren%ere%. !e per"orance o" t!is %uty is inseparable "ro t!eaut!ority con"erre% upon it.

+%3*%$%:E 3*R$%*N5!is result, !o'ever, %oes not no' preclu%e t!e concession o" a ne' trial praye% "or by t!e

respon%ent )ational :abor ;nion, $nc. $n t!e portion o" t!e petition !ereinabove +uote% o" t!e)ational :abor ;nion, $nc., it is allee% t!at Pt!e suppose% lac6 o" leat!er aterial claie% by

oribio eo%oro 'as but a sc!ee a%opte% to systeatically %isc!are all t!e ebers o" t!e)ational :abor ;nion, $nc., "ro 'or6P an% t!is averent is %esire% to be prove% by t!e petitioner'it! t!e Precor%s o" t!e 9ureau o" #ustos an% t!e 9oo6s o" Accounts o" native %ealers in leat!erPIt!at Pt!e )ational 5or6ers8 9rot!er!oo% ;nion o" An ibay is a copany or eployer union

%oinate% by oribio eo%oro, t!e existence an% "unctions o" '!ic! are illeal.P Cetitioner "urt!erallees un%er oat! t!at t!e ex!ibits attac!e% to t!e petition to prove !is substantial averents Pareso inaccessible to t!e respon%ents t!at even 'it! t!e exercise o" %ue %ilience t!ey coul% not beexpecte% to !ave obtaine% t!e an% o4ere% as evi%ence in t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elationsP, an%t!at t!e %ocuents attac!e% to t!e petition Pare o" suc! "ar reac!in iportance an% e4ect t!att!eir a%ission 'oul% necessarily ean t!e o%i3cation an% reversal o" t!e u%ent ren%ere%t!erein.P 5e !ave consi%ere% t!e reply o" An ibay an% its aruents aainst t!e petition. 9y an%lare, a"ter consi%erable %iscussion, 'e !ave coe to t!e conclusion t!at t!e interest o" ustice'oul% be better serve% i" t!e ovant is iven opportunity to present at t!e !earin t!e %ocuentsre"erre% to in !is otion an% suc! ot!er evi%ence as ay be relevant to t!e ain issue involve%.

!e leislation '!ic! create% t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations an% un%er '!ic! it acts is ne'. !e"ailure to rasp t!e "un%aental issue involve% is not entirely attributable to t!e parties a%verselya4ecte% by t!e result. Accor%inly, t!e otion "or a ne' trial s!oul% be, an% t!e sae is !ereby

rante%, an% t!e entire recor% o" t!is case s!all be rean%e% to t!e #ourt o" $n%ustrial &elations,'it! instruction t!at it reopen t!e case, receive all suc! evi%ence as ay be relevant, an%ot!er'ise procee% in accor%ance 'it! t!e re+uireents set "ort! !ereinabove. So or%ere%.

Avancea, C. J., Villa-Real, Imperial, Diaz, Concepcion,an Moran, JJ.,concur.Motion for new trial granted and ca!e remanded wit" in!trction!.

ang tibay vs cir, 69 phil. 635, february 27, 1940

Documents