anao performance audit of the strengthening basin communities in5slides
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ANAO performance audit of the Strengthening Basin Communities in5slides](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071818/55ae4ded1a28abe9738b4629/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ANAO performance audit of the Strengthening Basin Communities
Program…
The Australian Government’s $200M Strengthening Basin
Communities Program aimed to help communities in the
Murray Darling Basin cope with reductions to water
available for irrigated agriculture.
The Audit Office looked at how well the Department for the
Environment administered the SBCP.MARCH 2014
![Page 2: ANAO performance audit of the Strengthening Basin Communities in5slides](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071818/55ae4ded1a28abe9738b4629/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The projects aimed to beef up community
planning and to improve the efficiency of water
use. The auditor considered that all of the
projects funded achieved positive results.
But, of the $200M allocated, this program only
implemented projects worth $81M. The
remaining funding was reapplied to Regional
Development programs
WHAT DOES IT SAY.
MARCH 2014
![Page 3: ANAO performance audit of the Strengthening Basin Communities in5slides](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071818/55ae4ded1a28abe9738b4629/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
It looks like the guidelines issued by the department
weren’t coherent, making it difficult for applicants to
understand the evaluation criteria.
Then Environment departed from its own assessment
processes, without documenting reasons for doing so.
So the “transparency, accountability and, ultimately, the
equity of the assessment and selection process was
adversely affected’’.
WHAT ELSE DOES IT SAY.
MARCH 2014
![Page 4: ANAO performance audit of the Strengthening Basin Communities in5slides](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071818/55ae4ded1a28abe9738b4629/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
There could have been a gap in communication
between proposal assessment and project
management. The auditor identified decisions to
tailor scoping for some projects that didn’t
tightly align with the merit assessment.
Project performance reporting was mixed, and
the auditor recommended a more consistent and
transparent approach be adopted the future.
WHAT ELSE DOES IT SAY.
MARCH 2014
![Page 5: ANAO performance audit of the Strengthening Basin Communities in5slides](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071818/55ae4ded1a28abe9738b4629/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• These were very complex projects, with pressured politics, and it looks like the program didn’t get going fast enough, or corral the pragmatism necessary to get things moving.
• If they can implement these ANAO recommendations, Environment staff could be the best grant managers in Canberra.
• The pity is that the rest of the funding was given to Regional Development!
The comments on these slides are the views of Tim Kirby, Sydney.
You should always read the report itself before putting your reputation, or any money, on the line.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN.
Tim Kirby, Sydney CA, CIA, LA-EMS
au.linkedin.com/in/timkirbysydney
MARCH 2014