analytical aspects comparison dtn and ic determinations jacoban...gabriele tartari 1 & carmen...

10
Gabriele Tartari 1 & Carmen Jacoban 2 Analytical aspects comparison DTN and IC determinations Life+ FutMon - Working Group on QA/QC in Laboratories Meeting of the Heads of the Laboratories 12-13 October 2009 in Warsaw 1 C.N.R. Institute of Ecosystem Study, Verbania (Italy) 2 Forest Research Station, Campulung Moldovenesc (Romania)

Upload: others

Post on 01-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Gabriele Tartari 1 & Carmen Jacoban 2

    Analytical aspects comparisonDTN and IC determinations

    Life+ FutMon - Working Group on QA/QC in LaboratoriesMeeting of the Heads of the Laboratories

    12-13 October 2009 in Warsaw

    1C.N.R. Institute of Ecosystem Study, Verbania (Italy)2Forest Research Station, Campulung Moldovenesc (Romania)

  • DTN determination

  • Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 6 Standard 7 Standard 8 Standard 9

    NT 0.4-6 Media 0.094 0.188 0.237 0.353 0.470 0.700 0.934 1.154 1.381Med.+2SD 0.101 0.196 0.251 0.372 0.491 0.725 0.978 1.211 1.430

    Med.-2SD 0.088 0.179 0.222 0.334 0.448 0.675 0.889 1.098 1.332R.S,D 3.6 2.3 3.1 2.7 2.3 1.8 2.4 2.4 1.8n° dati 25 23 22 20 24 23 24 20 24

    mg N/L 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0RF medio 0.2361 0.2349 0.2367 0.2350 0.2348 0.2333 0.2334 0.2308 0.2302

    Total nitrogen UV determination 220 nm OP 1 cm from 2000 to 2009

    DTN determination

    Diff. -0.017 -0.013 -0.004 -0.005 -0.006 0.003 0.008 0.000 -0.025

    CNR-ISE Italy

    Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 6 Standard 7 Standard 8 Standard 9

    NT 0.4-6 Media 0.111 0.201 0.240 0.358 0.476 0.697 0.926 1.154 1.406mg N/L 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0RF medio 0.2786 0.2509 0.2405 0.2384 0.2381 0.2323 0.2314 0.2308 0.2343

    Total nitrogen UV determination 220 nm OP 1 cm - Carmen Jacoban 4-5 May 2009

  • DTN calibrations comparison

    y = 4.3492x - 0.0293

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60A

    mg

    N/L

    Cuvetta 1 cm0,4-6,0 mg N/L

    y = 4.3518x - 0.0593

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60A

    mg

    N/L

    Cuvetta 1 cm0,4-6,0 mg N/L

    Slope

    Slope

    CNR-ISE ItalyAverage 10 years

    calibrations 2000-2009

    Carmen JacobanMay 2009

    One calibration

  • IC determination

    Instruments:

    Dionex ICS 3000 cationsDionex DX 500 cations Gabriele TartariDionex DX 320 anions

    Dionex ICS 3000 Carmen Jacoban

  • Cloruri

    0.90

    1.00

    1.10

    1.20

    1.30

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101

    106

    111

    116

    121

    126

    131

    136

    141

    146

    151

    156

    161

    166

    mg

    l-1

    Solfati

    3.30

    4.30

    5.30

    6.30

    7.30

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101

    106

    111

    116

    121

    126

    131

    136

    141

    146

    151

    156

    161

    166

    mg

    l-1

    Dati Media UCL UWL LWL LCL

    Azoto nitrico (Detector Cond. & UV)

    0.90

    1.00

    1.10

    1.20

    1.30

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101

    106

    111

    116

    121

    126

    131

    136

    141

    146

    151

    156

    161

    166

    mg

    l-1

    CNR-ISE control chart from Jul 2008-Apr 2009Carmen’s data 2 May 2009

  • UCL Upper Control Limit (massimo accettato) = Media + 3 D.S. consigliataUWL Upper Warning Limit (massimo consigliato) = Media + 2 D.S. consigliataLWL Lower Control Limit (minimo consigliato) = Media - 2 D.S. consigliataLCL Lower Warning Limit (minimo accettato) = Media - 3 D.S. consigliata

    Sodio

    0.01

    0.06

    0.11

    0.16

    0.211 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    mg

    l-1

    Azoto ammoniacale

    0.100.150.200.250.300.350.40

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    mg

    l-1

    Potassio

    0.01

    0.06

    0.11

    0.16

    0.21

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    mg

    l-1

    Magnesio

    0.02

    0.07

    0.12

    0.17

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    mg

    l-1

    Calcio

    0.200.300.400.500.600.700.80

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    mg

    l-1

    UCL UWL LWL LCL Dati Media

    Sodio

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    area

    Magnesio

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

    area

    Azoto ammoniacale

    0.000.100.200.300.400.50

    1 8 15 22 29 36 43

    area

    CNR-ISE control chart from Mar-Apr 2009

    Carmen’s data 2 May 2009

  • Thank you for your attention

  • CNR-ISE Italy

    IC = 0,9892 SAFAS + 0,00340.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    0.40

    0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40NH4 (mg N L-1) SAFAS

    NH

    4 (m

    g N

    L-1

    ) IC

    IC = 1,0214 SAFAS - 0,01420.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    1.60

    1.80

    2.00

    0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00

    NH4 (mg N L-1) SAFAS

    NH

    4 (m

    g N

    L-1

    ) IC

  • CNR-ISE ItalyTolal Range (mg L-1)Half Range on mediane (mg L-1) 0.050 - 0.30 0.30 - 2.00

    N. data 476 508Test Wilcoxon (a 0.001) OK OK

    Probability 0.037 0.78

    IC = a + b x SPECr 0.9316 0.9924

    Test Slope = 1 (0.001) OK NON OKSlope 0.989 1.021

    Test Intercept = 0 (0.001) OK OKIntercept 0.003 -0.014

    DIFFERENCE from data OK OK

    DIFFERENCE (µg N L-1)Min -98 -176

    25 %ile -16 -29Mediane -3 -1

    75 %ile 12 29Max 97 128

    Average -2 0

    DIFFERECE absolute (µg N L-1)25 %ile 7 13

    Mediane 15 2975 %ile 26 52

    Max 98 176Average 20 34

    N-NH4 comparison SPEC Phe - IC

    Jen 2005 - Jun 2006

    SPEC - IC

    0.05 - 2.00

    Slajd 1Slajd 2Slajd 3Slajd 4Slajd 5Slajd 6Slajd 7Slajd 8Slajd 9Slajd 10