analysis on shoe industry based on porters 5 force model
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
BARRIERS TO ENTRY• Access to inputs - Access to inputs is easy
• Access to distribution opportunities is limited because of the top brands which have already recognized in market
• Switching costs are low
• Government policies –permitting and licenses are not that strict.
• Intellectual property – Patents and other types of proprietary intellectual property are effective in limiting industry entry.
• Capital requirement- With regard to start up capital, it may be little costly because start up is labour and capital intensive.
• Brand Identity- dominated by branded products and strong brand loyalty.
HIGH !
BUYER POWER• Brand identity-High end brands and Large
companies in the industry set price points for their products.
• Substitutes Available- Except athletic,orthopedic,dancing shoes
all other types can be substituted by normal sandals.• Product Differentiation –Low
• Buyer concentration vs. industry- Buyers are less concentrated, reduces buying power.
• Buyer Volume-Don’t buy in large quantities.• Price sensitivity-Buyer’s are more sensitive to
price.
LOW!
SUPPLIER POWER• Major firms can switch suppliers quickly
without worry of a significant decrease in quality.
• Threat of forward integration –Low due to high entry barriers
• Supplier concentration- Fragmented• Any supplier that meets quality standards for
the company will be able to supply these commodity goods.
LOW !
THREAT OF SUBSTITITES• Can be
substituted except for athletic shoes by normal sandals
• Switching costs are low
MODERATE
RIVALRY WITHIN INDUSTRY
• More of an emphasis on non-price competition.
• Firms instead try to increase their range of products to capture more of the market.
• Brand image and customer loyalty is huge in this industry, which leads to the brands competing in advertising.
• Some companies acquire other brands; mergers.Ex; Adida’s acquisition of Reebok may help it challengeNike.
HIGH