analysis of competition_1

82
1 Competitor analysis At the end of this module the learning outcomes are: - Importance of understanding competition - Approaches to competitor analysis - Identifying competitors likely response

Upload: swastikap

Post on 30-Oct-2014

913 views

Category:

Business


6 download

DESCRIPTION

marketing strategy

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis of competition_1

1

Competitor analysis

At the end of this module the learning outcomes are:- Importance of understanding competition- Approaches to competitor analysis- Identifying competitors likely response

Page 2: Analysis of competition_1

2

Competitor analysis

Suggested Readings

• Strategic Marketing Management by Wilson & Gilligan (chapter 4)

• Strategic Marketing by: David Cravens (chapter 7)

Page 3: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Who are the competitors of

• Brooke Bond Red Label Tea

• Samsung fax machine

• Titan Watch

• Rajdhani express

3

Page 4: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Think again

• Have the sales of Samsung fax machines gone down because of e-mail?

• Who is your competitor?

4

Page 5: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Are they

• Water

• E-mail

• Arrow shirt

• Spice Jet

5

Page 6: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Harley Davidson perception of competition

• Last American motorcycle

• Symbol of freedom and adventure

• Technically antiquated

• Not seen as form of transport

• Social statements

• Compete against various recreations6

Page 7: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

ASIAN PAINTS

• Indian paint industry

• Highly concentrated

• Top four players

• 95% of the market share

• Asian Paints

• Market leader7

Page 8: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

ASIAN PAINTS

• Next player has less than half market share

• How it has maintained

• Strong value proposition

• Higher customer perceived benefits

• Lower costs

8

Page 9: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

ASIAN PAINTS

Higher customer perceived benefits

• Initial foray in semi-urban and rural market

• Required extensive distribution network

• Bypasses wholesaler arrangement

• Appointed retailers in semi-urban areas all over India

9

Page 10: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

ASIAN PAINTS

Higher customer perceived benefits• Rural areas• Smaller size paint products• Risk of inventory build up• Invested in IT to ensure strict inventory control• Networking of offices and depots

10

Page 11: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Higher customer perceived benefits

• Urban areas

• Paints for every price points

• Competitively priced thus encouraging economies of scale

• Launch of premium paints

• Launch of color world tinting system

• Customers mix shade before buying11

Page 12: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Higher customer perceived benefits

• Entry into painting solutions

• Dominated by unorganized sector

• Offer solutions

• Higher margins in services

12

Page 13: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Lower costs

• Color world tinting

• Means lower stocks

• Reducing inventory and working capital

• Tight control on receivables

• Inventory in number of days and receivables lower than industry average

13

Page 14: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

These initiatives have helped Asian Paints to maintain its competitive advantage and distinct edge over competitors

14

Page 15: Analysis of competition_1

15

Competitor analysis

Importance- Provides an understanding of your competitive

advantage / disadvantage relative to your competitor’s position.

- Insights into competitors strategies- Developing future strategies to sustain/establish

advantages over your competitors.

Page 16: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Seeking competitive advantage

Two types of analysis

• Industry analysis

• Comparative analysis

16

Page 17: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Industry analysis

• Every industry

• Peculiar characteristics

• Porter’s five-force model

17

Page 18: Analysis of competition_1

18

Competitor analysis

Porter's approach to competitive structure

analysis

Nature and intensity of competition within any industry is determined by the interaction of five key forces:

1. The threat of new entrants

2. Power of buyers

3. Threat of substitutes

4. Extent of competitive rivalry

5. Power of suppliers

Page 19: Analysis of competition_1

19

Competitor analysis1. Threat of new entrants

- Depends on barriers to entry- How heavy is the capital investment

Intel's huge investment into research- Strong brand image to overcome

Coke investments required to build brands- Cost incurred to create distribution channels

Hindustan Lever’s huge investments

in distribution in rural areas

Page 20: Analysis of competition_1

20

Competitor analysis2. Power of buyers

- Is likely to be higher if:

1. There are large number of suppliers

2. Alternative sources of supply

3. Threat of backward integration

Example

Reliance Industries

1. Started as textiles company

2. Makes raw materials to produce textiles

3. Vertically integrated

4. Bargains on price for huge quantities it picks up.

Page 21: Analysis of competition_1

21

Competitor analysis3. Threat of substitutes

- Will be more prevalent if:- Customers perceive other offers to perform

the same function as ours- Substitute products offer higher value for

money- Substitute products earn higher profits

Page 22: Analysis of competition_1

22

Competitor analysis

– Onion versus ready to make paste » Dabur Hommade pastes

– Tomato versus tomato puree– Scooters versus Motorcycles

» Hero Honda sales at the expense of Bajaj

– Vanaspati versus edible oils

Page 23: Analysis of competition_1

23

Competitor analysis4. Extent of competitive rivalry

Intensity of rivalry will be greater if:- Competitors are of equal size and are seeking

dominance- High fixed costs provoke price wars to maintain

capacity. E.g: Airlines industry

Page 24: Analysis of competition_1

24

Competitor analysis

– New addition of capacity have created excess capacity

Hotel industry Automobile industry

– Product homogeneity necessitates activity to maintain share.

» Coke versus Pepsi

Page 25: Analysis of competition_1

25

Competitor analysis5.Power of suppliers

Is likely to be higher if:- There are few suppliers- Cost of switching from one supplier to another is

high

E.g: Intel

Suppliers are likely to integrate forward

Kirloskar compressors into airconditioners.

Reliance entry into petroleum products retailing

Page 26: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Comparative analysis

• Specific advantage of competitors within a given market

Two types

• Structural advantage

• Responsive advantage

26

Page 27: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Structural advantage

• Built into business

• A manufacturing plant at Chennai for Hyundai to carry out exports

27

Page 28: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Responsive advantage

• Position of comparative advantage that have accrued to business over time

• Leveraging strategic phenomena at work in the business

• Either cost or unique value

• Indigo over Air India

28

Page 29: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Intensity and Degree of competition

Factors

• Opportunity potential

• Ease of entry

• Nature of product

• Exit barriers

• Homogeneity of market29

Page 30: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Intensity and Degree of competition

Factors• Industry structure or competitive position of firms• Commitment to the industry• Feasibility of technological innovations• Scale economies• Economic climate• Diversity of firms

30

Page 31: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Opportunity potential

• Promising industry attracts rivals

• Telecom service operators

31

Page 32: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Ease of entry

• Easy entry

• Attracts marginal players

• Committed players discourage potential entrants

• Colgate trying to thwart Anchor with Brands

32

Page 33: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Nature of product

• Offerings perceived to be similar

• Tends to go on price

• Severe competition

33

Page 34: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Exit barriers

• Regulated

• Exit difficult

Mobile services

34

Page 35: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Homogeneity of market

• Intensity is higher than segmented

Telecom services versus Telecom handset players

35

Page 36: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Industry structure or competitive position of firms

• Large number of firms

• Intensity higher

• Aggression leads to retaliation

• Fewer players leads to less retaliation

36

Page 37: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Commitment to the industry

• Contribution to overall sales

• Maintain position at any cost

Wipro versus Infosys

37

Page 38: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Feasibility of technological innovations

• Frequent innovations

• Do their best in short time

• Intensity is higher

38

Page 39: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Scale economies

• Economies of scale benefits are high

• Will do everything to get volume

• Aggressive competition for market share

• Escalates pressure

Airlines industry

39

Page 40: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Economic climate

• Boom times

• Relatively moderate

• Recession

• Companies bite each other

• Intensity is higher

40

Page 41: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Diversity of firms

• Old players in the industry

• Display a predictable behavior

• New participants

• Can do many unconventional behavior to upset existing players

Dell’s model

41

Page 42: Analysis of competition_1

42

Competitor analysis

Marketing Myopia

• Theodore Levitt

• Marketing Guru

• How business is defined

• Why American rail business a massive decline

• Onslaught of airlines

Page 43: Analysis of competition_1

43

Competitor analysis

THE COURIER MARKET

• came in 70s

• Launch of fax

• Later email

• How players handled competition

Page 44: Analysis of competition_1

44

Competitor analysis

Two approaches

• Adopt new products

• Strengthen existing business

Page 45: Analysis of competition_1

45

Competitor analysis

Adopt new products

IBM

• Hardware in 70s

• Threat from low-cost producers

• Shifted focus to software

Page 46: Analysis of competition_1

46

Competitor analysis

Strength existing business

FED EX

• Earlier couriers

• Competition from fax, email

• Shifted focus on parcel market

• Physical distribution required

• Offered door-to-door delivery

Page 47: Analysis of competition_1

47

Competitor analysis

FED EX

• Offer complete logistics solutions

• Found existing players not offering these solutions

• Gradually left the space for document courier to smaller companies

Page 48: Analysis of competition_1

48

Competitor analysis

MOSQUITO REPELLANT DEVICES

BALSARA

• Launched ODOMOS in 1964

• Unattended need

• Cream based product

• Inhouse R & D

• Earlier smoke sensing devices were used

Page 49: Analysis of competition_1

49

Competitor analysis

MOSQUITO REPELLANT DEVICES• Now creams• Held 97% share of the cream market• What are the concerns• Later Tortoise was launched• Used ‘smoke’ concept• Economical• Gained 70% market share• Odomos 20% share

Page 50: Analysis of competition_1

50

Competitor analysis

MOSQUITO REPELLANT DEVICES• 1984• Goodknight brand• No use of cream or coil• Value proposition

– Cleaner– Less messy– Convenient

Page 51: Analysis of competition_1

51

Competitor analysis

MOSQUITO REPELLANT DEVICESBy late 90s• Mats/liquid-70%• Coils-22%• Creams-9%• Balsara tried to launch mats/liquid

BALSARA lost the market which it created

in 1964

Page 52: Analysis of competition_1

52

Competitor analysis

Poor understanding of the competition

• Decline– Air coolers– Mopeds– Soya-based drinks

Page 53: Analysis of competition_1

53

Competitor analysisCompetition happens at four levels

1.Companies offering only similar products

- Kitkat versus Perk

- Nescafe versus Bru

Page 54: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Competition happens at four levels

2 Companies consisting of all companies operating in the same category

- Cadbury's Eclairs versus. Nestle Kitkat

- Canada Dry versus Pepsi Cola

54

Page 55: Analysis of competition_1

55

Competitor analysisCompetition at four levels

3. Competitor consists of all companies manufacturing or supplying products which deliver the same service

- Airlines versus Railways

- Second hand cars versus scooters versus Tata Nano

Page 56: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Competition happens at four levels

4. Competition consists of all companies competing for the same spending power

- Dishwasher versus Microwave oven

- Designer jewelry versus Ritu Beri's fabrics

- Debeer’s versus Nokia mobile phones

 

56

Page 57: Analysis of competition_1

57

Competitor analysis

COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUMFive scenariosIf competitors are nearly identical and make their

living in the same way, then the competitive equilibrium is unstable.

• Identical products• Commodity industries• Competitive equilibrium gets upset if one cuts

prices

Page 58: Analysis of competition_1

58

Competitor analysis

If a single major factor is the critical factor, then competitive equilibrium is unstable

• Differentiation is possible• Breakthrough in technologies• Cut costs• Change habits of consumers• Apple’s Iphone• Amazon.com

Page 59: Analysis of competition_1

59

Competitor analysis

• If multiple factors may be critical factors, then it is possible for each competitor to have some advantage and be differentially attractive to some customers. The more the multiple factors that may provide an advantage, the more the number of competitors who can coexist. Each competitor has his competitive segment defined by the preference for the factor trade-offs that he offers.

• Retailing industry in India

Page 60: Analysis of competition_1

60

Competitor analysis

• The fewer the number of competitive variables that are critical, the fewer the number of competitors.

• If one factor is critical, fewer competitors.

• More variables, larger number of competitors, but smaller in size.

Page 61: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

• Is it always prudent to increase your market share?

61

Page 62: Analysis of competition_1

62

Competitor analysis

• A ratio of 2 in 1 in market share between two competitors seems to be the equilibrium point at which it is neither practical nor advantageous for other competitor to increase or decrease share.

Page 63: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Marketing Myopia

• Traditional way of looking competition

• Narrow definition

• Identify direct and indirect competition

Page 64: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Red-Ocean thinking

• Seeking bloody

• Head-to-head battles with competitor

• Based on improvements in costs, quality or both

Page 65: Analysis of competition_1

Competitor analysis

Blue-Ocean thinking

• Creating products and services

• There are no direct competitors

• Go beyond conventional boundaries

• Find unoccupied competitions

• Represent real value innovation

Page 66: Analysis of competition_1

66

Competitor analysis

Blue-Ocean thinkingEASYJET• Low-cost carrier• European carrier• Quite successful• ‘Fly to Scotland for a pair of jeans.’• Competitor to full-price carriers like British

Airways, Lufthansa• How 3Vs were used?

Page 67: Analysis of competition_1

67

Competitor analysis

Valued customer-who to serve• Traditional carriers targeted everyone• Mainly business travelers• Travel mostly on company expenses

EasyJet• Target those customers who pay from their own

pocket,• Predominantly entrepreneurs, small business owners

Page 68: Analysis of competition_1

68

Competitor analysis

EasyJet• Target those customers who pay from their own

pocket • Predominantly entrepreneurs, small business

owners• Large segment in Europe• Were unhappy with offerings of full-price carriers

Two strategic segments identified

Page 69: Analysis of competition_1

69

Competitor analysis

Valued-proposition-what to offer?

• Major differences between two segments

• Business segment– Demanding – Freebies such as newspaper, meals– Want seamless connections– Less waiting

Page 70: Analysis of competition_1

70

Competitor analysis

• Small business travel

• Willing to forgo these services

• Lower prices

• EasyJet’s value proposition answers four issues

Page 71: Analysis of competition_1

71

Competitor analysis

Which attributes that our industry takes for granted should be eliminated?

• Free meals and travel agents to be eliminated.

• Sells food on aircraft

• Eliminated travel agents

• Tickets sold on internet

Page 72: Analysis of competition_1

72

Competitor analysis

Which attributes should be reduced to below industry standards?

• Have the offering been overdesigned?• What can be reduced• Flexibility in flight changes and seat selection• Non-refundable fares• Seat on first-come, first-served basis• Incentive for passengers to board earlier

Page 73: Analysis of competition_1

73

Competitor analysis

Which attributes should be increased to above industry standards?

• Lower prices

• Punctuality

• Younger fleet of aircraft

Page 74: Analysis of competition_1

74

Competitor analysis

Which new attributes should be created that the industry has never offered?

• New sources of value creation

• One-way fares refund if the flight is delayed beyond four hours

Page 75: Analysis of competition_1

75

Competitor analysis

Value curve• Compare the value proposition of various

players in the industry• Full-price carriers are superior on every

dimension• Which attributes are most important to air

travelers?• Reach safely• Low prices a concern

Page 76: Analysis of competition_1

76

Competitor analysis

Easy Jet• Streamlined operations• Fast turnaround• Greater utilization• single type of aircraft (Boeing 737)• Reduces spare parts inventory• Increases bargaining power with vendors• Lower pilot training costs• Elimination of business class means more seats can be

accommodated

Page 77: Analysis of competition_1

77

Competitor analysis

FIVE PRINCIPLES OF EASYJET VALUE NETWORK

1. Avoid fixed costs wherever possibleNo secretarial staff

2. Cover fixed costs quicklyAircrafts remain in air for 11 hours

3. Eliminate variable costs wherever possibleAvoid use of travel agents

4. Keep variable costs lowAvoid landing at major ports

5. Convert fixed costs into revenue generatorsSell food items in aircraft

Page 78: Analysis of competition_1

Customer and Competitor Orientations

Competitor-Centered Companies

Example

• Competitor launching a new product next brand of soap in Delhi region

• Float a scheme for retailers for our existing soap

Page 79: Analysis of competition_1

Customer and Competitor Orientations

Competitor-Centered Companies

Advantages

• Organization develops a fighter orientation

• Trained to be on constant alert

Disadvantages

• Too reactive

• Too much dependent on competitor moves

Page 80: Analysis of competition_1

Customer and Competitor Orientations

Customer-Centered Companies

• Focus on customer developments

• The market of children is getting saturated

• Let us reposition the product to widen the market to include youth.

Page 81: Analysis of competition_1

Customer and Competitor Orientations

Customer-Centered Companies

Advantages

• Better position to identify new opportunities

• Choose a course which delivers long-term growth and profits

• Monitoring customer needs

• Amazon.com

Page 82: Analysis of competition_1

Customer and Competitor Orientations

Customer-Centered Companies

Disadvantages

• Counter attack by competitors

• Odomos by Good Knight mosquito repellant

• Good Knight became the leader