analisa lego in summary

2
HBS CASES HBS Cases: LEGO Published: March 18, 2013 Author: Maggie Starvish LEGO toys have captivated children and their parents for 80 years. But managing the enterprise has not always been fun and games. Professor Stefan H. Thomke explains the lessons behind a new case on the company. Although it isn't part of the admissions criteria, experience playing with LEGOs can come in handy at Harvard Business School. When Stefan H. Thomke teaches his new case about the iconic toy company, he gives students eight-studded LEGO building bricks to figure out how many different ways they can be combined. Thomke's experience goes back a long way—as a kid growing up in Germany he participated in a LEGO competition. As an adult, though, his interests lie more in the business behind the bricks. "When you've written many cases you have a gut feeling that one like this could be really great," he says. Thomke, the William Barclay Harding Professor of Business Administration, wrote the case with Harvard Business School's Jan W. Rivkin, the Bruce V. Rauner Professor of Business Administration, and Daniela Beyersdorfer, associate director of the HBS Europe Research Center. LEGO explores how the company-one of the most profitable toymakers in the world-grew to global dominance from humble beginnings; the mistakes that led it near bankruptcy; and why one turnaround attempt failed while a second succeeded. LEGO executives were unusually supportive about the case-writing process, Thomke says. "We had access to everybody; they wanted the story to be told truthfully, with all the good and the bad." Building at the start Part of that access included a visit to a wood craftsman's workshop in the small town of Billund, Denmark, where LEGO began, in 1916. Carpenter Ole Kirk Kristiansen eventually shifted the business from making houses and furniture to crafting wooden toys. He based the name of his new venture on the Danish words for "play well" (and, as it turned out, the Latin words for "to assemble"). His motto "Only the best is good enough" would later be carved into a wooden plaque and hung in the workshop. These themes of good play and quality products were both bedrocks and touchstones for future generations of LEGO toy makers. Godtfred Kirk Kristiansen represented the second generation, working alongside his father at age 12. The LEGO brick played with by kids and adults around the globe came into being during Godtfred's tenure. He considered it a unique, sturdy, simple product—a system—that offered endless opportunities for creative fun, and drew up a list of product characteristics including "long hours of play" and "quality in every detail" that was distributed to everyone in the company. Like his father, Godtfred paid careful attention to every aspect of the business, applying, for example, his knowledge of material science and production technology to the brick-manufacturing process. It's because of these precise specifications that bricks made under his watch are interchangeable with those available today. Godtfred's cautious nature extended all the way to the profit margins: he championed slow, steady growth. Because of this, it could take years for a new product to go to market. Green bricks, for instance, appeared in play sets only after a decadelong decision-making process-and the idea to include them came from Godtfred's son (and third-generation toymaker), Kjeld. The snail's pace served the company well, as did the grandson of its founder. Under Kjeld's management, product demand was so high at times that executives actually found themselves discussing ways to slow sales. A shock to the system That all changed in the early 1990s as seismic shifts pounded the toy market. Big Box toy discounters trampled mom-and-pops and lowered prices dramatically. Meanwhile, birth rates declined, children had less time to play and not much interest in toys that didn't offer instant gratification. "These changes did not play well to our strengths," observed current CEO Jørgen Vig Knudstorp in the case. Serious jolts were also taking place in the LEGO Group. Out of work for a year following a serious illness in 1993, Kjeld appointed a five-person management team to help him run the company when he returned. The group focused mainly on driving growth. When a benchmarking study revealed LEGO's global name recognition was on par with industry giants like Disney, the team started churning out new products and ideas to leverage the brand's untapped value. A line of LEGO-branded children's wear was created and a division of the LEGO Group was charged with pitching book, movie, and TV ideas. LEGO building sets became increasingly complex with more unique components. While the number of LEGO-branded items grew, sales did not, and in 1998 the company suffered its first financial loss. "Their top-line growth was slowing down but their cost was accelerating, so they were starting to lose some significant money," says Thomke. Danish turnaround expert Poul Plougmann was hired to reassemble LEGO and staunch the red ink. "He comes in and ? does things by the book," says Thomke. "He lays people off, he streamlines some things, he globalizes." And yet the financial picture grew worse. "He's basically going by the turnaround book, but it doesn't work." One continuing problem: the company's growing complexity was choking it. Adding more bricks made products harder to assemble, forecasts harder to determine, and inventory harder to manage. Depending on the kit, there was either too much inventory, or no inventory at all, and restocking could take months. "You had this multiplier effect of added complexity that went through the entire supply chain," Thomke says. The LEGO Group had also gotten too far away from the core values it had been building on for the better part of a century. The toymaker found itself needing to turn around its turnaround. Outside the family Enter Jørgen Knudstorp. He was just 35 years old when Kjeld promoted him from director of strategic development to CEO in 2004. (Kjeld retired that same year.) Like Plougmann, he had no family ties to the company. Unlike Plougmann, his turnaround attempt succeeded. Knudstorp's slow-it-down approach of careful cash management, focusing on core products, and reducing product complexity certainly contributed to that success. It would also take re-engaging with customers, many of whom passed a love of LEGOs to their children while COPYRIGHT 2012 PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE 1

Upload: yelena-effendi

Post on 16-Aug-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Summary of Lego Case by Harvard Business Review.

TRANSCRIPT

HBS CASESHBS Cases: LEGOPublished: March 18, 2013Author: Maggie StarvishLEGOtoys have captivated children andtheirparentsfor80years. But managingtheenterprise has not always been fun and games.Professor StefanH. Thomke explains thelessons behind a new case on the company.Althoughit isn't part of the admissionscriteria, experience playingwithLEGOs cancome in handy at Harvard Business School.WhenStefanH. Thomketeacheshisnewcaseabout theiconictoycompany, hegivesstudents eight-studded LEGO building bricks tofigure out how many different ways they can becombined. Thomke's experience goes back along wayas a kid growing up in Germany heparticipated in a LEGOcompetition. As anadult, though, his interests lie more in thebusiness behind the bricks. "When you'vewritten many cases you have a gut feeling thatone like this could be really great," he says.Thomke, the William Barclay HardingProfessor of Business Administration, wrote thecase withHarvardBusiness School's JanW.Rivkin, the Bruce V. Rauner Professor ofBusiness Administration, and DanielaBeyersdorfer, associate director of the HBSEurope Research Center.LEGOexplores howthe company-one ofthe most profitable toymakers in theworld-grewtoglobal dominancefromhumblebeginnings; the mistakes that led it nearbankruptcy; andwhyone turnaroundattemptfailed while a second succeeded. LEGOexecutives were unusually supportive about thecase-writingprocess, Thomke says. "We hadaccesstoeverybody; theywantedthestorytobe toldtruthfully, withall the goodandthebad."Building at the startPart of that access included a visit to a woodcraftsman's workshop in the small town ofBillund, Denmark, where LEGO began, in1916. Carpenter Ole Kirk Kristianseneventually shifted the business frommakinghousesandfurnituretocraftingwoodentoys.HebasedthenameofhisnewventureontheDanish words for "play well" (and, as it turnedout, the Latinwords for "toassemble"). Hismotto"Onlythebest isgoodenough"wouldlater be carved into a wooden plaque and hungintheworkshop. Thesethemes of goodplayandqualityproducts werebothbedrocks andtouchstones for future generations of LEGO toymakers.GodtfredKirkKristiansenrepresentedthesecond generation, working alongside his fatherat age 12. The LEGO brick played with by kidsandadults aroundtheglobecameintobeingduring Godtfred's tenure. He considered it aunique, sturdy, simple producta systemthatofferedendlessopportunitiesfor creativefun,anddrewupa list of product characteristicsincluding"longhoursofplay"and"qualityinevery detail" that was distributed to everyone inthe company.Like his father, Godtfred paid carefulattention to every aspect of the business,applying, for example, his knowledge ofmaterial scienceandproductiontechnologytothe brick-manufacturing process. It's because ofthese precise specifications that bricks madeunder his watch are interchangeable with thoseavailable today. Godtfred's cautious natureextendedallthewaytotheprofitmargins:hechampionedslow, steadygrowth. Becauseofthis, it could take years for a new product to goto market. Green bricks, for instance, appearedin play sets only after a decadelongdecision-making process-and the idea to includethem came from Godtfred's son (andthird-generation toymaker), Kjeld.Thesnail'spaceservedthecompanywell,as did the grandson of its founder. UnderKjeld's management, product demandwas sohigh at times that executives actually foundthemselves discussing ways to slow sales.A shock to the systemThat all changed in the early 1990s asseismic shifts pounded the toy market. Big Boxtoy discounters trampled mom-and-pops andloweredpricesdramatically. Meanwhile, birthratesdeclined, childrenhadlesstimetoplayandnot muchinterest intoysthat didn't offerinstant gratification. "These changes did notplaywell toour strengths," observedcurrentCEO Jrgen Vig Knudstorp in the case.SeriousjoltswerealsotakingplaceintheLEGO Group. Out of work for a year followinga serious illness in 1993, Kjeld appointed afive-person managementteam to help him runthe company when he returned. The groupfocused mainly on driving growth. When abenchmarking study revealed LEGO's globalname recognition was on par with industrygiants likeDisney, theteamstartedchurningout newproducts and ideas to leverage thebrand's untapped value. A line ofLEGO-branded children's wear was created anda divisionof the LEGOGroupwas chargedwith pitching book, movie, and TV ideas.LEGO building sets became increasinglycomplex with more unique components.While the number of LEGO-branded itemsgrew, salesdidnot, andin1998thecompanysuffereditsfirst financial loss. "Theirtop-linegrowthwasslowingdownbut their cost wasaccelerating, so they were starting to lose somesignificant money," says Thomke.Danishturnaroundexpert Poul Plougmannwas hired to reassemble LEGO and staunch thered ink. "He comes in and ? does things by thebook,"saysThomke. "Helayspeopleoff, hestreamlines some things, he globalizes." Andyet the financial picture grewworse. "He'sbasicallygoingbytheturnaroundbook, butitdoesn't work."One continuing problem: the company'sgrowing complexity was choking it. Addingmore bricks made products harder to assemble,forecasts harder to determine, and inventoryharder to manage. Depending on the kit, therewas either too much inventory, or no inventoryat all, and restocking could take months."You had this multiplier effect of addedcomplexity that went through the entire supplychain," Thomke says.TheLEGOGrouphadalsogottentoofaraway from the core values it had been buildingon for the better part of a century. The toymakerfound itself needing to turn around itsturnaround.Outside the familyEnter Jrgen Knudstorp. He was just 35years old when Kjeld promoted himfromdirector of strategic development to CEOin2004. (Kjeld retired that same year.)LikePlougmann, hehadnofamilytiestothe company. Unlike Plougmann, histurnaround attempt succeeded. Knudstorp'sslow-it-down approach of careful cashmanagement, focusingoncore products, andreducing product complexity certainlycontributedtothatsuccess. Itwouldalsotakere-engaging with customers, many of whompassed a love of LEGOs to their children whileCOPYRIGHT 2012 PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE 1still connecting with the toys themselves. "Oneof the insights Jrgen had when he becameCEO was that he needed to reconnect with thecommunity[of loyal LEGOfans], oneof themost powerful assetsthecompanyhad,"saysThomke. "It was a huge part of the comeback."Knudstorpworkedhardtodefinethecorebusiness of the company. "How you work with,and experiment outside of, the core of yourbusiness is part of that balance," explainsThomke.Knudstorprecognizedthat innovationwaspart of that core, but he'd also seen the result ofunconstrained creativity, so new product designbegan to be informed by market research, userfeedback, andhowwell thetoysmatchedthevisionof qualitycreativeplaylaidout byitsfounding fathers. Putting parameters on howpeopleinnovatehadtheparadoxical effect ofmaking them better at it.Reining in the creative process was part of alarger push by Knudstorp to reduce overallcomplexity within the organization. On thesupply chain side, he did away with many of theunique brick components added duringPlougmann'stenure, andeventuallydecidedtobring brick manufacturing back in-house toensure quality control.Finally, Knudstorp made big changes to themanagement team, firing five of sevenmanufacturing executives and appointing a newleader for the team. A psychoanalyst wasbrought in to teach the management team howto identify decision-making made by logicversus emotion.Sustainable and balancedIt turns out that LEGOs promotelifelonglearning. While the bricks themselves teachchildrenthefundamentalsof constructionandcreativity, the company's almost century-oldhistoryof management change has importantlessons for businesspeople. "Managingsustainable growthis alsoabout managingabalanced business system," says Thomke."Complexityissomethingyouneedtowatchvery closely."Controllingcomplexity, clarifyingthecoreof its business, and engaging the largercommunity helped save the LEGO Group.Althoughhe was not a Kristiansenbybirth,Knudstorp's management style and businessideals closelymirroredthose of its foundingfathers. Only the best was, and is, good enough.About the authorMaggie Starvish is a writer based inSomerville, Massachusetts.HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL | WORKING KNOWLEDGE | HBSWK.HBS.EDUCOPYRIGHT 2012 PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE 2