an exploration: moving your enterprise to a cloud collaboration
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at Educause Southeast 2012 - The ever-costly hardware refresh cycle for administrative systems, coupled with budget cutbacks and IT audit findings, prompted five community colleges and their system offices to explore hosting or cloud computing as an alternative to independent systems at each of their campuses. Is collaborating in such a move to the cloud truly a viable option for lowering or maintaining current costs, both in real dollars and in staff hours? Can benefits be realized in terms of providing enhanced, more secure services, better redundancy, and increased availability and scalability? What issues arise when institutions collaborate in such a venture? Bring your own experiences and questions to this open dialogue where we'll create a working roadmap that you and others can follow.TRANSCRIPT
An Exploration: Moving Your Enterprise
to a Cloud Collaboration Thomas Danford | Tennessee Board of Regents
Fred Lewis | Northeast State Community College
May 31, 2012
#DISC22
AGENDA
This is a Discussion Session
Some background
Discussions
The economies of scale in collaboration
Tangible benefits #DISC22A
Pros & cons #DISC22B
Staff & management concerns #DISC22C
Roadmap items #DISC22D
(Already hosting, Considering Hosting, Corporate Sponsors)
ABOUT THE TENNESSEE BOARD OF REGENTS &
NORTHEAST STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR)
Public post-secondary education system est.1972
6 universities, 13 community colleges and 27 technology
centers with programs in 90 of Tennessee’s 95 counties
200K+ Students, 14K+ employees, and a budget in
excess of $2.4B
Northeast State Community College
Founded in 1966 and under the governance of the TBR
since 1983
Enrollment of 6,775 students
A HISTORY OF BOTH COLLABORATION AND
CLOUD COMPUTING
Collaboration
Online Degree Program (RODP)
System Maintenance Office (SMO) & DBA Collaborative
Business Intelligence (BI)
Cloud (Hosting) Computing
Learning Management Systems
Self Hosted (WebCT at UoM)
Commercial (D2L)
Most recently Administrative …
In the State of Tennessee’s Data Center
Other
COLLABORATIVE “CLOUD” COMPUTING
Economies of Scale $
TANGIBLE BENEFITS (TIER 4)? #DISC22A
Physical Plant
• Intruder Secruity (Guards, Locks, Cameras, etc.) (State Audit concern)
• HVAC & Environmental Controls (Closed system, Redundant, Excess capacity)
• Power (N+1 Redundant, 2 circuits, Independent path, PDU, UPS/Battery)
• Diesel Generator (Redundant, 5 days operation w/o refueling)
• F-4 Tornado Rated Facility, Not on a floodplain
• Fire Detection & Suppression (State Audit concern)
• Bandwidth & Connectivity (Multiple providers, Independent path)
Infrastructure
• Offsite Data Replication (Disaster recovery/Business Continuity)
• Network Management (Firewalls, Load balancing)
• Server Failover
• Enterprise SAN with commodity disk space (fiber vs. SATA) • Enterprise Backups (Disk 2 Disk 2 Tape, 30 day onsite disk recovery, Deduplication) • 4 Year Hardware Refresh • System and Security Monitoring Appliances & Software (HP OpenView, Security)
Service Levels (Represents Increases in Staff Capability Presently Unavailable)
• Deep bench of Technicians (Networking, Server Admin, DBA)
• Network/Servers/Databases monitored 24 X 7
• Patches and upgrades are managed (State Audit concern)
• Strict Change Control Policy is enforced (State Audit concern)
• Help Desk is available 24 X 7
• Disaster Recovery Plan and Testing (State Audit concern) • Full-time Security Officer & Staff of 30
TANGIBLE BENEFITS (TIER I – IV)
HOSTING – PROS & CONS? #DISC22B
PROS – CAMPUS
IT staff can be repurposed to more “value add”
job functions
Better computing infrastructure w/o large
capital expenditures
Pooling resources results in lower overall
costs (15-30%)
Standardization across application suite
A more robust disaster recovery (DR) strategy
PROS – CAMPUS (CONTINUED)
Less complex IT audits
Enhanced security within Banner
Lower licensing costs for OS, DBMS,
compilers, etc.
“On-sight” support with proactive monitoring
CONS – CAMPUS
Perceived loss of control of system/data
Perceived concerns for long-term employment
Campus may have to alter processes to fit into
hosted environment
Scheduled downtimes for maintenance
PROS – SHARED ENVIRONMENT
Standardization of system equipment
Scheduled maintenance & 24x7 staff support
Standardized system processes
“Force multiplier” doing more with less for the
campuses
Enables staff to “specialize”
CONS – SHARED ENVIRONMENT
Additional security concerns
Outages will effect more than one campus
Internal changes with development practices
Complex infrastructure configurations
STAFF & MANAGEMENT CONCERNS? #DISC22C
STAFF & MANAGEMENT CONCERNS
Position elimination or demotion
Necessitation of learning new skillset(s)
Moving from an “eyes down” environment to one
of customer interaction
Moving from providing to provisioning (brokering)
DEVELOPING ROADMAP ITEMS? #DISC22D
CLOUD COMPUTING ROADMAP ITEMS Objective: Provide for an orderly migration to a cloud computing environment
Current State Analysis Opportunity & Concerns
Identification Business Case & Roadmap
Activities
Define key initiatives to achieve desired future state capabilities
Finalize statement of work and project plan
Identify interdependencies and required implementation sequencing
Prepare project budget
Negotiate service level expectations
Develop a talent management program
Present consolidated roadmap, metrics design and related definitions to executive leadership
Deliverables
Statement of Work (SOW) Project Plan/Work Breakdown Structured (WBS)
Detailed Budget
Service Level Agreement (SLA) & Dashboards
Job descriptions and staff development plans
Contract with terms & conditions
Activities
Identify key opportunities and benefits
Establish Executive Dashboard Vision and priorities
Develop initiative write-ups including:
– Project principles & desired outcomes
– Roles and expections
– Budgeting and resource allocations
Document overall changes to process, technology and data
Finalize framework for governance and related initiatives
Deliverables
Future State Capability Vision
Principles of Implementation
Governance Structure
Budgetary Proposal
Activities
IT management interviews and surveys
Stakeholder interviews and surveys
IT architecture analysis
IT budget analysis
IT staffing analysis
Review existing audit and risk analysis reports and documentation
Cloud/hosting vendor capabilities research
Deliverables
Current State assessment (gap analysis and process capability)
Interview key findings and observations
Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Estimate