thomas boermans, unit manager built environment strategies brussels, 29 th november 2011 economic...

Post on 27-Mar-2015

217 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Thomas Boermans, Unit Manager Built Environment Strategies

Brussels, 29th November 2011

Economic effects of investing in energy efficiency in buildings - the BEAM² ModelEC WORKSHOP, COHESION POLICY INVESTING IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS

© ECOFYS | | 29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

Agenda

Energy efficiency in buildings – background

Baltic Energy Efficiency Network (BEEN)

Economic impacts of EE in buildings at EU level

Some recommendations

© ECOFYS | |

The buildings sector:significant and cost effective potential

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Mt CO2eq

€ /

t C

O2eq

Source: Ecofys, project SERPEC-CC for European Commission DG-Environment, 2009

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

The (political) vision

Cost optimal requirements nearly zero energy

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

The comitology process

jViRjCCC fi

diaj

Ig

,1

,

Cost optimal requirements nearly zero energy

see also www.bpie.eu

TOTAL COSTS

€ /m2

kWh/m2

CO2 costs

Energy costs

Other energy related construction costs

Maintenance costs

Installed appliances invest.

Building envelope investments

Package

1

23 4

5

6

heating

cooling

ventilation

lighting

……..

TOTAL COSTS

€ /m2

kWh/m2

CO2 costs

Energy costs

Other energy related construction costs

Maintenance costs

Installed appliances invest.

Building envelope investments

Package

1

23 4

5

6

heating

cooling

ventilation

lighting

……..

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Timelines – new buildings

2010 2020 20XX

Cost optimal requirements nearly zero energy ???

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Timelines - retrofit

2010 20XX 20YY

Cost optimal requirements deep renovation ? ???

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Baltic energy efficiency network - BEEN

• Assessment of current status of energy efficient refurbishments in Baltic sea region

• Assessment of energy- and CO2 saving potentials & job effects

• Development of strategies & instruments to promote energy efficient refurbishment

• focus on multi-storey housing built 1950 - 1990.

• Implementation of three best practice projects

client: Berlin Senate, BMVBS, EU

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Baltic energy efficiency network - BEEN

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Baltic energy efficiency network - BEEN

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Baltic energy efficiency network - BEEN

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | | 29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

BEAM²

© ECOFYS | | 29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

BEAM²

© ECOFYS | | 29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

Reference Scenario Germany

0

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

250.000

300.000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

kt/a

Heating + Hot Water (all buildings) [BMWi] direct and indirect emissions Heating + Hot Water (all buildings) [BMWi] direct emissions only

"-40% in 2020" target Heating + Hot Water (all buildings)

Sensitivity retrofit rate 1.8% Sensitivity retrofit rate 1.0%

-40% Emission Saving Target

CO2-mitigating potential for heating and hot water in residential and non-residential buildings up to 2010

from study evaluation and forecast until 2020. For 2010-2020, three scenarios with different retrofit-rates

(1.0%, 1.4% and 1.8%) are calculated, resulting in different emission paths. Not climate corrected.

© ECOFYS | |

Financing retrofit – some numbers

Example for timeframe 2010 to 2020 for EU27

• Increase retrofit rate from 1,7 % p.a. (BAU) to 2,8%

• Improved ambition level (in the area of cost optimality)

• Estimated results*• Additional energy related investment: 30 billion € p.a.• Total energy related investment: 65 billion € p.a.• Total invest (energy and non-energy): 100 billion € p.a.

(turnover building industry in 2009: 1,2 trillion EURO)• Negative CO2 abatement costs

* based on research done by Ecofys in the framework of the impact assessment of the

EPBD recast / energy saving action plan (using BEAM²)

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Different renovation tracks – indicative only

2010 20502020 2030 2040

track 1

track 2

Track 1: fast renovation: (very) high speed, average ambition level

Track 2: deep renovation: average speed, (very) high ambition level

CO

2 –

em

issi

ons

EU

build

ing s

tock

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

© ECOFYS | |

Enabling factors for retrofit (examples)

Political/Legal

• review (EU/national) definitions of major renovation, see

www.eceee.org/press/Extending_EE_requirements/

• define ambition level for “deep renovation”

• secure balance of interests in investor user conflict

Financial/fiscal

• provide soft loans at reduced interest rates and longer loan

duration (e.g. 20 years, state guarantees)

• fiscal instruments (e.g. reduced VAT)

Information

• information/realisation campaigns

• ensure proper training and capacity building

29/11/2011 Thomas Boermans

Thomas Boermans

Unit Manager Built Environment Strategies

E: t. boermans@ecofys.com

T: +49 221 270 70-151

W: www.ecofys.com

top related