third annual convening

Building Guided Pathways to Success for States and Students

Third Annual Convening

Data-Driven Change: Metrics

27 states and 743 institutions

Hawai‘i Graduation InitiativeCampus Completion Scorecards

Dr. Pearl Imada Iboshi, DirectorUniversity of Hawai‘i System

Institutional Research and Analysis OfficeOffice of the Executive Vice President/Provost

Scorecard Context

UH has well-established system/campus strategic outcomes and performance measures through 2015

Total degrees and certificates earned: Total, STEM and Native Hawaiians

Going rates of public and private high schools

Disbursement of Pell

Campuses are meeting their goals, yet graduation rates have not improved

Scorecard Goal

Improve Graduation rates and facilitate data-driven change by:

Focusing on graduation rates in major categories, including on-time rate

Identifying factors that affect timely graduation

Highlighting progress measures leading to completion

Working with campuses to initiate strategies based on metrics

Strategy for Scorecard Development

Do analysis to show that metrics selected affect completion

Keep the data simple and easily accessible through an “at a glance” sheet

Get campus buy-in to metrics used Establish a baseline for future performance

Fall first-time, full-time freshmenwith 6+ credits at entry

Fall 07 Cohort

Credits at Entry % of cohort

0 1,178 68.10 < x < 6 275 15.96+ Credits at Entry 278 16.1TOTAL 1,731 100.0

Graduate in 4 Years Graduates Grad Rate(%)

0 170 14.40 < x < 6 51 18.56+ Credits at Entry 96 34.5TOTAL 317 18.3

Metrics UsedGraduation rates, retention rates, time and credits to

degreeMeasures known to affect completion for first-time

students: 6 or more credits at entry Taking math and English in first year Taking 30 or more credits in first year Declaring major by start of second year

Measures showing on going-progress and measures of time and credits to degree for all students

Distance learning and summer credits to total credits % of students taking 15 credits % students with more than 120 credits

Scorecard Value and Buy-In

Met with and received approval from all campus Chancellors and Vice Chancellors

Armed campuses with knowledge on key data points in preparation for HGI Summit II (CCA academy) Oct. 2012

Next Steps: Establish Routines to Promote Data-Driven Change

Plan an annual roll out, beginning Winter 2013 with measures updated to AY2011-2012

Establish new targets on completion and consider targets for progress metrics for inclusion in Scorecard version 2.0

Schedule regular discussions on systemwide student and academic affairs committees on progress and completion issues

Continue to offer campuses system support

Highlight campus successes on HGI website

Value-Added Funding at a Glance

Displayed another way, value-added funding looks like this:Basic Structure Optional Enhancements Community College Options

Freshman 1.0 Closing attainment gaps + .2(Pell students) Gateway course completion + .2

Sophomore/AA or AS graduate 1.2 STEM, nurses + .2 Technical certificate completion = 1.2

Junior 1.4 Flagship Options Transfers with 30 credits = 1.2

Senior 1.6 Master’s, doctoral graduates + .2 Associate degree graduates = 1.4

BA or BS graduate 1.8 On time BS or BA + .2 Part-Time StudentsValue proportionally (full-time equivalency of 30 credit hours per year)Receive the same value-added weighting as full-time students