the knowledge egg stanford

Post on 06-Jul-2015

1.420 Views

Category:

Health & Medicine

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, 4th of February 2010.

TRANSCRIPT

The Knowledge Egg

Øystein Eiring, Geir Kristian Lund, Endre Aas. Innovation group and project management, EviCare, Norway.

1. The problem 2. Making a solution 3. The Egg

The problem

02/15/10 2

Clinicians need knowledge from research, but:

Problem 1: Most research findings are not reliable

2: Most research is not readable at point-of-care

Problem 3: Most reseach is not relevant

02/15/10 3

Evidence-based practice the heroic way

4

Evidence-based practice the heroic way

02/15/10 5

Evidence-based practice the heroic way

6

Are there short-cuts to evidence-based

practice?

7

Building a solution

02/15/10 8

February 15, 2010 9

Shortcut # 1: Pre-appraised single studies

2. Knowledge refinery: – Reading the 130

best journals– Throwing 90

percent +– 7000 clinicians

asked for relevance

23 000 pre-appraised studies: MacPLUS

February 15, 2010 10

Shortcut # 1: Pre-appraised single studies

2. Knowledge refinery: – Reading the 130

best journals– Throwing 90

percent +– 7000 clinicians

asked for relevance

23 000 pre-appraised studies: MacPLUS

Problem:

will miss other studies about the same topic

Shortcut # 2: systematic reviews

Identifies all research about an intervention

Assesses quality of research and throws most

Summarizes the rest

Systematic reviews are more reliable than single studies

Shortcut # 2: systematic reviews

Identifies all research about an intervention

Assesses quality of research and throws most

Summarizes the rest

Systematic reviews are more reliable than single studies

Problem:

covers few topics and most often not conclusive

Shortcut # 3: clinical guidelines

Research only describes what is

Guidelines describe what should be done

Shortcut # 3: clinical guidelines

Research only describes what is

Guidelines describe what should be done

take into account values, resources, politics, patients opinions, expert opinion

Need quality assessment

Problem:

too lenghty to be useful at point of care

Shortcut # 3: clinical guidelines

Research only describes what is

Guidelines describe what should be done

take into account values, resources, politics, patients opinions, expert opinion

Need quality assessment

Shortcut # 4: evidence-based textbooks

16

Shortcut # 4: evidence-based textbooks

17

Problem:

lack local adaptation and ownership

Shortcut # 5: Evidence-based procedures

…care pathways

…care plans

…order sets

18

Building a solution

What if we combined all the short-cuts

in a hierarchy?

(some are better than others)

19

The 6S Model

Quality-assessed single studies

Systematic reviews

Quality-assessed systematic reviews

Single studies that need quality assessment

Guidelines and evidence-based textbooks

Localprotocols,pathwaysin CDSS

Seek answers

as close to the top

as possible

Quality-assessed single studies

Systematic reviews

Quality-assessed systematic reviews

Single studies that need quality assessment

Guidelines and evidence-based textbooks

Localprotocols, pathwaysin CDSS

More reliable,

relevant and

readable

Building a solution: full-text access

02/15/10 22

Norwegian Health Library: core features

Publicly funded

Access for the whole population preferred

Quality assessments of knowledge -AGREE

6S increasingly used as fundamental knowledge model

02/15/10 23

24

Scientific journals

Bibliographic databases

Evidence-bases textbooks

Clinical guidelines

Systematic reviews

What if we merged

the hierarchy

with full-text

local, national and international

knowledge resources?

25

26

The Knowledge Egg

27

The Knowledge Egg

Evidence-based local procedures/pathways

Evidence-based textbooks

Guidelines

Systematic reviews

Quality-assessed studies

Other studies

28

One search into all resources

Instruction

Usage: by the individual clinician at point-of-care

02/15/10 29

Here is the answer-in the top of the egg!

Usage: by those making procedures and pathways

30

Benefits: –everything in your hand

Common interface for local, international and national knowledge

Continuous updating

Underlying machinery not visible

Decision support –not dictatorship

31

Benefits: –everything in your hand

EBM despite low information literacy among health personnel

Shared knowledge between clinicians and patients

32

Norwegian Electronic Health Library

Øystein Eiring, Geir Kristian Lund, Endre Aas. Innovation group and project management, EviCare, Norway.

top related