the knowledge egg stanford

33
The Knowledge Egg Øystein Eiring, Geir Kristian Lund, Endre Aas. Innovation group and project management, EviCare, Norway. 1. The problem 2. Making a solution 3. The Egg

Upload: oystein-eiring

Post on 06-Jul-2015

1.420 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, 4th of February 2010.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

The Knowledge Egg

Øystein Eiring, Geir Kristian Lund, Endre Aas. Innovation group and project management, EviCare, Norway.

1. The problem 2. Making a solution 3. The Egg

Page 2: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

The problem

02/15/10 2

Page 3: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Clinicians need knowledge from research, but:

Problem 1: Most research findings are not reliable

2: Most research is not readable at point-of-care

Problem 3: Most reseach is not relevant

02/15/10 3

Page 4: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Evidence-based practice the heroic way

4

Page 5: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Evidence-based practice the heroic way

02/15/10 5

Page 6: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Evidence-based practice the heroic way

6

Page 7: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Are there short-cuts to evidence-based

practice?

7

Page 8: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Building a solution

02/15/10 8

Page 9: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

February 15, 2010 9

Shortcut # 1: Pre-appraised single studies

2. Knowledge refinery: – Reading the 130

best journals– Throwing 90

percent +– 7000 clinicians

asked for relevance

23 000 pre-appraised studies: MacPLUS

Page 10: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

February 15, 2010 10

Shortcut # 1: Pre-appraised single studies

2. Knowledge refinery: – Reading the 130

best journals– Throwing 90

percent +– 7000 clinicians

asked for relevance

23 000 pre-appraised studies: MacPLUS

Problem:

will miss other studies about the same topic

Page 11: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 2: systematic reviews

Identifies all research about an intervention

Assesses quality of research and throws most

Summarizes the rest

Systematic reviews are more reliable than single studies

Page 12: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 2: systematic reviews

Identifies all research about an intervention

Assesses quality of research and throws most

Summarizes the rest

Systematic reviews are more reliable than single studies

Problem:

covers few topics and most often not conclusive

Page 13: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 3: clinical guidelines

Research only describes what is

Guidelines describe what should be done

Page 14: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 3: clinical guidelines

Research only describes what is

Guidelines describe what should be done

take into account values, resources, politics, patients opinions, expert opinion

Need quality assessment

Problem:

too lenghty to be useful at point of care

Page 15: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 3: clinical guidelines

Research only describes what is

Guidelines describe what should be done

take into account values, resources, politics, patients opinions, expert opinion

Need quality assessment

Page 16: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 4: evidence-based textbooks

16

Page 17: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 4: evidence-based textbooks

17

Problem:

lack local adaptation and ownership

Page 18: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Shortcut # 5: Evidence-based procedures

…care pathways

…care plans

…order sets

18

Page 19: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Building a solution

What if we combined all the short-cuts

in a hierarchy?

(some are better than others)

19

Page 20: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

The 6S Model

Quality-assessed single studies

Systematic reviews

Quality-assessed systematic reviews

Single studies that need quality assessment

Guidelines and evidence-based textbooks

Localprotocols,pathwaysin CDSS

Page 21: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Seek answers

as close to the top

as possible

Quality-assessed single studies

Systematic reviews

Quality-assessed systematic reviews

Single studies that need quality assessment

Guidelines and evidence-based textbooks

Localprotocols, pathwaysin CDSS

More reliable,

relevant and

readable

Page 22: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Building a solution: full-text access

02/15/10 22

Page 23: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Norwegian Health Library: core features

Publicly funded

Access for the whole population preferred

Quality assessments of knowledge -AGREE

6S increasingly used as fundamental knowledge model

02/15/10 23

Page 24: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

24

Scientific journals

Bibliographic databases

Evidence-bases textbooks

Clinical guidelines

Systematic reviews

Page 25: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

What if we merged

the hierarchy

with full-text

local, national and international

knowledge resources?

25

Page 26: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

26

The Knowledge Egg

Page 27: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

27

The Knowledge Egg

Evidence-based local procedures/pathways

Evidence-based textbooks

Guidelines

Systematic reviews

Quality-assessed studies

Other studies

Page 28: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

28

One search into all resources

Instruction

Page 29: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Usage: by the individual clinician at point-of-care

02/15/10 29

Here is the answer-in the top of the egg!

Page 30: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Usage: by those making procedures and pathways

30

Page 31: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Benefits: –everything in your hand

Common interface for local, international and national knowledge

Continuous updating

Underlying machinery not visible

Decision support –not dictatorship

31

Page 32: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Benefits: –everything in your hand

EBM despite low information literacy among health personnel

Shared knowledge between clinicians and patients

32

Page 33: The Knowledge Egg Stanford

Norwegian Electronic Health Library

Øystein Eiring, Geir Kristian Lund, Endre Aas. Innovation group and project management, EviCare, Norway.