the canadian and the portuguese public administrations: a ... · the canadian and the portuguese...
Post on 11-Nov-2018
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
The Canadian and thePortuguese Public
Administrations: A Tale of TwoStories and two Countries
(1960/2010)
L. Valadares TavaresFull Professor Emeritus, IST, University of LisbonPresident of APMEP – Portuguese Society of Public MarketsFormer President of the Portuguese NationalInstitute of Public Administration
Brief Comparison
I – GeneralCanada Portugal
Population 31 M 10 M
Political RegimeMonarchy
(Federation)Republic
Government Levels• Federal• Provinces• Municipal
• National• Municipal and 2
AutonomousRegions
GDP / hab (2010)(OECD = 100 PPP)
119,9 75,6
Brief Comparison
II – Public AdministrationCanada Portugal
Nº civil servants (includingEduc., Health and Security/Army)
3.3 M(10% pop.)
0.6 M(6% pop.)
Wages /GDP 10% 11%
Legal Framework and Careers
Civil ServiceCommission (CSC)
Parliament and Government
Recruitment Depts Ministry of Finances
Brief Comparison
II – Public AdministrationCanada Portugal
PromotionsPublic Services
Comission (PSC)Ministry of Finances
High Level Nominations PSC Government
Salaries Treasury Board (TB)Parliament andGovernment
TrainingCanada School of
Public ServiceUntil 2011: INA
Now?
More and better services !
Canada:
Many Examples !
Portugal: Also !
Portugal: Success Examples
Child Mortality Rate
% Access to Higher Education if born on:
1980: 24/1000 2000: 6/1000
1960: 6% 1980: 39%
Better (e-)channels !
Flexible Time-Tables e-Access
E-Full Services e-Interaction
Despite high disparities !
Scatterplot
Nível de Ensino vs Poder de Compra perCapita
Grupo A
Grupo B
Grupo C
Grupo D
Grupo E
Grupo F
Grupo G
Grupo H
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
3536
37
3839
40
41
42
43
44
4546
4748
49
5051
52
53
545556
57
58
59 6061
62
636465
66
6768
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
8182
83 84
85
86
87
8889
90
91
9293
94
95 96
979899
100
101
102
103104
105
106
107
108109
110 111
112
113114
115 116117
118
119120
121122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129130
131
132
133
134
135136
137
138
139
140141142
143144145146
147148149
150
151
152
153
154
155156
157
158
159160161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
186
187
188
189
190
191
192193
194
195196
197
198
199200
201202
203
204205
206
207
208
209
210
211 212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221222
223
224
225
226
227
228229
230
231 232
233
234
235236237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245246
247
248
249
250251
252253
254
255
256257
258
259260
261262
263
264
265266
267
268
269
270
271272
273
274
275276
277
278
0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20 0,25 0,30 0,35 0,40 0,45
Nível de Ensino
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Poder
de C
om
pra
perC
apita
Classes de Concelhos(número de concelhos)
H (1)G (1)F (13)E (30)D (51)C (58)B (74)A (47)
Média exame Matemática (cod. 435) 2002
por Concelho
1
2
34
5
6
7
8
910
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4142
444546
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
56
58
59
60
62
69
70
71
72
73
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
116
118
119
120
124
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
143
144
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
175
176
177
178
179 180
181
182
183
184
186
187
188
189
190
191
192193 194
195
196
198
200
201
202
204
205
207
208
209
211
213
214
215
216 217
218
219
220
221
224
227
233
234
239
240
241
245
247
249
250
254
255
257
258
259
261
263
267
268
269
270
272
273
274
275
276
278
GRUPO
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Mé
dia
Mate
má
tica 2
00
2
A B C D E F G H
Story 2: Portugal
Growth with:
- Higher complexity
- Successive unconsistent layers
In – Services Model
Archipelago Paradigm
Instead of Services sourcing
. . .
3 – Personel Model
Bureaucratic ModelManagement by
Objectives[2003: Performance
Evaluation]
2 – Qualification Model(% compared to society)
Low Qualified
High Qualified
10
9
1
1950 2000
Distribuição por remuneração: AP Portugal
- Remuneração Media: 1243 € -
0
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
<300
356,6
378,3
425
475
525
575
625
675
725
775
825
875
925
975
1050
1150
1250
1350
1450
1550
1650
1750
1850
1950
2050
2150
2250
2350
2450
2550
2650
2750
2850
2950
3050
3150
3250
3350
3450
3550
3650
3750
3850
3950
>4001
Euros
Pesso
as
Distribuição por Remuneração
Distribuição por Remuneração: AP Finlândia
- Remuneração Media: 1706 € -
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
<704
771
838
905
972
1039
1106
1173
1240
1307
1374
1441
1508
1575
1642
1709
1776
1843
1910
1977
2044
2111
2178
2245
2312
2379
2446
2513
2580
2647
2714
2781
2848
2915
2982
>3049
Euros em PPC/Portugal
Pesso
as
Distribuição por Remuneração
The 4 Layers Theory
1935 – 75 1975 – 1985 1985 – 1995 1995 – 2005
Direct PublicAdministration
(Reform of 1935)
Local and Regional
AdministrationsSocial State
Public Firms(including
Hospitals, EPE)+ Regulators
+ PPP
Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4
Management Control
LAYER
100%
1DPA
02
LRA3
SS4
PF
Confirmation of the 4- LAYERS TheoryAnnual Expenditure* (M Euros. Source DGO, 30 Set.2012)
AnnualExpenditure(T)
TOTALDPA Local Adm. Reg. Adm. SS PF
2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 ∆
Wages(W)
9870 8359 2020 1827 732 656 2992 2563 2700 2312 18224 15717 -14%
Acquisition of Goods and
Services (GS)1440 1352 1476 1501 293 364 8560 10079 7864 9156 19633 22452 +14%
GS/T (%) 13% 14% 42% 45% 29% 36% 74% 80% 74% 80% 52% 59%
Which Reform of which State?
top related