the - callan park 'your plancallanparkyourplan.com.au/downloads/submissions/cps36_our...
Post on 06-Sep-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
THE
REPORT
The OUR PICK Report accuses the Australian health industry of corruption and proposes the empowerment of mental health patients and prisoners to achieve effective delivery of services.
Proposal
l thatafixedpercentageof0.1%ofthementalhealthbudgetbesetaside asmandatoryfundingofindependentconsumergroups;
l thatthoseconsumergroupsbedemocraticallyresponsivetoconsumers’concerns,addressingissuesofgeneralimportance,fundingconsumer-directedresearchand interactingwithgovernmentpolicies;
l thatintheinterim,allserviceprovidersinthementalhealthindustry fundindependentconsumerfunctionswithapercentageoftheirbudgets.
LaunchedattheInternationalConferenceonPenalAbolitionICOPA13inBelfast onJune252010andintheForensicHospital,LongBay,SydneyonJuly1,2010.
July 2010ISBN:9780980672251(pbk.)NationalLibraryofAustraliaCataloguing-in-PublicationOffenderswithmentaldisabilities--Abuseof--Australia. Peoplewithmentaldisabilities--Abuseof--Australia. Healthfacilities--Complaintsagainst--Australia. Prisoners--Abuseof--Australia.DeweyNumber:362.20994
About our sponsorJUSTICEACTIONisfundedbythesocialenterpriseBREAKOUTDESIGNPRINTWEB,whichhasprovidedtopqualityprinting,designand webservicestounions,communitygroupsandcorporationssince1984.OfferworktoBREAKOUTatthesamepriceyouarenowpaying,and youwilladdstrengthtoJUSTICEACTION.Ordonatetohelpthework.www.breakout.net.auTelephone(02)92830123
TheOUR PICK
report
REPORT CONFRONTING THE ABUSE OF “CARE” IN MENTAL HEALTH AND PRISONS
PublishedbyJUSTICEACTION Suite204,TradesHall 4GoulburnSt,SydneyNSW2000,AustraliaP.O.Box386Broadway,Sydney NSW2007,Australiawww.justiceaction.org.au ja@justiceaction.org.auTelephone: 61292830123
Fax: 61292830112
Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SECTION 1: THE REALITIES OF MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS
LongBayLockdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
BanonSmokinginHospitals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
CaseStudy:SaeedDezfouli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
InvoluntaryInjection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
MentalHealthConsumersintheMedia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
TheJudicialSystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
SECTION 2: MECHANISMS FOR OPERATION IN PRACTICE
MentalHealthAct2007(NSW) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
ConsumerandCarerOrganisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
SECTION 3: KEY CHARTERS AND LEGISLATION
UNHighCommissionerforHumanRights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
UnitedNationsUniversalDeclarationofHumanRights(1948) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
UnitedNationsConventionontheRightsofPersonswithDisabilities(2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
DisabilityDiscriminationAct1992(Cth) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
MentalHealthAct2007(NSW) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
TheOUR PICK
report
REPORT CONFRONTING THE ABUSE OF “CARE” IN MENTAL HEALTH AND PRISONS
IntroductionJusticeActiondecidedtofocusonthementalhealthareaafterithadbecomeapparentthatanewstrategywasrequiredtodefendcommunityinterestsandprisoners’rightsagainstthelawandtheaddedeffectsoftension,boredom,powerlessnessandisolationoccurringinimprisonment.Manyprisonersbecomeforensicpatientsorremaininprisonundermedication:theratesofmajormentalillnessinprisonshavebeenfoundtobethreetimeshigherthanthatofthegeneralpopulation.1
Inmentalhealththefocusisonmakingpatientswell,withouttheelementsofguiltandpunishmentwhileretainingstatecontrolofcitizens.Patients(consumers)2hadbeenaskingforourassistance,andwesawthechanceofaforwarddefenceformentalhealthpatients’rights.Ifwecouldnotdefendpatients’humanrightswhatchancehadwewithprisoners?Uponexaminationwediscoveredthatforensic(incarcerated)mentalhealthconsumersreceiveevenlessrespectfortheirdignityandhumanity.Inpracticeitisdefinitelybettertobebadthanmad.Lawyerswhohaveenticedclientswithapsychiatricdefencearecursedfromthedungeons.Inbothprisonsandmentalhealthwardsalmosteveryonesmokes,butitistheforensicconsumerswhohavelosttheirtobacco.Prisonersareregardedasnormalpeoplewhohavemademistakes,havetopayapenaltyandthenreturntotheirformerstatus.Forensicconsumershowever,aretreatedlikechildren,unabletotakeresponsibilityfordecision-makingsometimesfortherestoftheirlives,dependingontheirpsychiatricdiagnosis.Totalarbitrarycontrolcontrarytoconsumers’wishesiscloakedaseuphemismsofexpressionsofcare.Theindustry’sculturecreatesprofessionalslackingempathyforpatients;stumblingglassy-eyedhumansareseenaseffectiveworkpractice.3InthenewLongBayForensicHospital,allpatientsaremedicated.Patientresistanceisconstruedassickness.Theconsumerfocusinmentalhealthhasbeenhijacked.Statedrightshavebecomevaluelessinthefaceofthisculture.Externalserviceprovidersdependentongovernmentmoneyarepartoftheproblem.Patientsaredehumanisedandexploitedtoyieldbudgetsofover$205,000perforensicpatientperyear.Privacyandsecuritymeanhidingfromexamination.Visitorsarediscouragedandrefused.Socialsupportforpatientsisseenascausingdisturbancerather
1 AustralianInstituteofHealthandWelfare(2009)The Health of Australian Prisoners Report.2 Theterm‘consumers’wasthepreferredtermbyparticipantsoftheNationalStatementofMentalHealth
RightsandResponsibilities(1991)3 TheWorldHealthOrganisation(WHO)identifiedtreatmentofmentalhealthconsumersasoneofthree
priorityproblemsinits‘HealthinPrisons’Project:AlexGatherer(2005)‘TheWorldHealthOrganizationEuropeanHealthinPrisonsProjectAfter10Years:PersistentBarriersandAchievements’American Journal of Public Health.
The OUR PICK report2
thanacommunityright,anecessarymeasureandanalternativetomedication.A“clinicaldecisionthatthepatient’smentalhealthmightbeaffected”isenoughforarefusal.Therearenostatedrules.Alonglineofreports,includingthe1992‘Burdekin’Reportandthe2005MentalHealthCouncilofAustralia(MHCA)(inassociationwiththeHumanRightsandEqualOpportunityCommission)‘NotforService’Report,allexpressthefailureinmentalhealthandtheneedforchange.However,nothinghaschangedonthegrounddespitebillionsoftaxpayers’dollarsbeingspent.Theproblemliesinthepowerlessnessofthoseforwhomtheservicesareprovided:identifiedbytheWorldHealthOrganisation(WHO)asoneofthekeybarrierstoconsumerparticipation.4 Authoritieshaveusedthestigmaofmentalillnessandabusedthetrustofthepublicpurse.Theyhavetakencontrol,redefinedtheservicesprovidedforthesickandboughtthesilenceofthosewhoshouldprotest.Allparticipantsinthepublicmentalhealtharea,excepttheconsumersandcarers,arepaidbyHealthDepartmentmoneyandareallcontrolledbythesamepeople.Obviouslytheseservicesarenotpatient-focused:theconsumershavenomoney.Patients’opinionsandcontributionstotheirownwellbeinghavebeende-legitimizedbythosewhomsocietyhastrustedtohelpthem,despiteinvolvementbeingessentialtogoodhealth.Further,enforcedmedicationisoftenusedcontrarytointernationalstandardstofillthegap.Contrastthisrealitywiththestatedpurposeofthehealthsystem,andtheessentialtenetsofdemocracythateveryhumanbeingisentitledtofairtreatmentandequalityregardlessoftheirmentalstatusordisabilityandregardlessofwhetherornottheyareincarcerated.5ThoseprinciplesintheUniversalDeclarationofHumanRightsandotherconventionsformthebasisofourlaws,butthereisnopowerofenforcement.Thispaperisbrokenupintothreeparts:1 Thefirstdescribesthealarmingrealitiesformentalhealthconsumersdespitetheexisting
legislationthatisintendedtoprotectthem.2 Thesecondpartfocusesonfundedandnon-fundednon-governmentorganisationsand
theirrolesasmechanismsforassertionofconsumers’rights.3 Thethirdpartofthispaperisanexplanationofkeychartersandlegislationsignedbythe
Australiangovernmentthatarerelevanttomentalhealthconsumers’rights.
ProposalWepropose:l thatafixedpercentageof0.1%ofthementalhealthbudgetbesetasideasmandatory
fundingofindependentconsumergroups;l thatthoseconsumergroupsbedemocraticallyresponsivetoconsumers’concerns,
addressingissuesofgeneralimportance,fundingconsumer-directedresearchandinteractingwithgovernmentpolicies;
l thatintheinterim,allserviceprovidersinthementalhealthindustryfundindependentconsumerfunctionswithapercentageoftheirbudgets.
4 WHO(1992) British Columbia Participation Project Report.5 WHO(2007)Health in Prisons Report,xvii.
The OUR PICK report 3
Section 1: The Realities of Mental Health Consumers
To be a mental patient is to be stigmatised, ostracised, “ socialised, patronised, psychiatrised. — Rae Unzicker Thelossofcontrolmentalhealthconsumershaveovertheirhealthisdisturbingonallaccounts.Thelegislationandorganisationsdiscussedintheothersectionsofthispaperdon’teffectivelyprotectconsumers’rights,butrestrictthemandjustifytheirabuse.Theauthoritiesandorganisationscorruptlytaketheveryresourcesandfundingmeanttoserviceconsumers’needsanduseitdehumanisethem.Consumersmusthavepowerovertheirownlivesandreceivesupporttoconsiderallmethodsoftreatment(exceptinthecaseofapresentseriousrisktothemselvesorothers).Thisshouldincludenotreatmentatall,withoutarbitrarydeterminationbythegovernment,psychiatrists,anddrugcompanies.JusticeActionhasbeenworkinginmentalhealthfordecades.Ouranalysesareonourwebsite.ButourfocusintensifiedafteranapproachbyforensicpatientsintheLongBayprisonhospitalinMarch2008,discussedbelow.Followingthis,consumersenteringhospitalsbegantocomplainthatsmokingbanswerebeingintroducedinthementalhealthunitsandunlikeotherpatients,theywerenotpermittedtogooutsidetosmoke.Wethencreatedananalysisthatunderminedanyhealthjustificationfortheban,showingitwascounterproductiveandanabuseofpower.In2008weformedtheRighttoChoosecampaign.WealsoexaminedthecaseofSaeedDezfouliduringourinvolvementinthementalhealtharena.Saaedisjustatypicalinvoluntarymentalhealthpatient.ButinexaminingwhathashappenedtohimitbecameobviousthattheHealthDepartmentitselfissick,thatpolicehandlementalillnessverypoorlyandthatitisdifficulttosupportconsumers’rightsagainsttheHealthDepartment.Consumersareoftenatthecentreofabuseandneglect.WenowareSaeed’sPrimaryCarerandstandbesidehimasasymbolforallinvoluntaryconsumers.
Long Bay LockdownForensicpatientsatLongBayprisonhospitalpetitionedJusticeActioninMarch2008followinganorderedremovalof28officersfromtheprisonhospitalareabytheprisonauthorities.Thiswasapartoftheirironicallynamed“WayForward”plan.Patientswerelockedintosolitaryconfinementcellsat3.30pminsteadof9pmaspartofacost-cuttingmeasure.Neitherorganisationsnorindividualsonthegroundseemedtocare.WethenapproachedthosedirectlyinvolvedintheissueandbeganaprocessofconsultationandcampaigningtoforcethetransferofcontroloftheLongBayprisonhospitalfromtheprisonstotheHealthDepartment.Thehealthprofession,includingAustralia’sleadingforensicpsychiatrists,nursesandtheMentalHealthCouncilofAustralia,unanimouslyagreedthatlockingpatientsinsolitaryconfinementforthatperiodwouldbelikelytoexacerbatementalillness.Thenurses,prisonofficersandpatientsthemselvesagreedthatitwasdetrimentaltotheirrecoveryandwouldcauseahugeincreaseinself-harmandsuicide.Thenursessaidthattheycouldnotgivehospitalcareunderthoseconditions,andthatthoseveryvulnerablepatientswithseverementalillnessesandmedical/surgicalpatientswouldneedtobetransferredtogeneralhospitals.6
6 ToaccessthecorrespondencebetweenJusticeActionandtheNSWNursesAssociationandotherdetailsseehttp://tiny.cc/0f5e0
The OUR PICK report4
Thepatientstoldthemanagerthattheywouldberefusingmedication.Bytheendofthecampaign,thefollowingactionhadtakenplace:
l TwoNoticesofMotionhadbeenplacedbeforeStateParliament,decryingthepractice(oneeachfromtheLiberalsandtheGreens)
l SupremeCourtproceedingsseekingordersthatthepracticebestoppedimmediatelywereimminent
l LegalproceedingsbasedonbreachesofAustralia’shumanrightsobligationsunderinternationaltreatieswerealsoimminent
l AcomplainthadbeenmadetoICACallegingDCSemployeeshadindulgedincorruptbehaviourbymisrepresentingthewishesofthepatientsandthedangeroushealtheffectsoftheearlylockdownpractice
l Significantadversemediacoveragehadbeengeneratedinnewspapers,onradioandaninvestigativepiecehadappearedonABCTV
l AnumberofadversewrittenstatementsandletterstotheAttorneyGeneralhadbeenmadebyAustralia’sleadingforensicpsychiatristsandtheirrepresentativebodies,aswellastheNSWNursesAssociation,HREOC,SANEAustralia,NCOSS,theAboriginalJusticeAdvisoryCouncilandothersignificantcommunityorganisations.
Finallythegovernmentacknowledgedtherightofforensicconsumerstotreatmentthatrespectedtheirspecialneeds.Tocausevulnerablecitizenstosufferforadministrativepurposesisessentiallytortureanddiminishesusasacommunity.ThegovernmentdecidedtotransfercontroloftheLongBayprisonhospitaltotheHealthDepartment.EventhenthegovernmentstalledandanUrgencyDebatewasplacedbeforeParliamenton12November2008.JusticeActionandtheNSWNursesAssociationprovidedwrittenandoralpresentationstothecrossbenchers.AllthepartiesintheUpperHousejoinedtogethertoensurethemotionwasdebated.7 Duringthecourseofthedebate,MinisterHatzistergosgaveanassurancethatby28November2008allforensicpatientswouldbetransferredtothenewforensichospital.Hiswordswereunequivocal:‘EveryoneknowsthatthecurrentsituationatLongBayprisonhospitalistemporary.Isaytemporarybecauseitisenvisagedthaton28NovemberthisyearthenewForensicHospitalwillcommencetooperate.WhenthatoccurssomeofthosepersonsdetainedintheLongBayprisonhospitalwhoareforensicpatientswillmoveintothenewforensichospitalunderaregimethatwillbemanagedentirelybyJusticeHealth.However,thoseinmateswhoremainintheprisonhospitalwillnotbeforensicinmates…’8 Butmanyarestillthere.Wearewatching.
Ban on Smoking in Hospitals TheRighttoChooseCampaign(http://www.righttochoosealliance.com.au/)inregardstothesmokingbanforpatientsisofspecialinteresttoJusticeAction.Thereisnobanonsmokinginregardstothelargerpopulation,andyetthegovernmentistryingtolegallywithholdthosesamerightsfrompsychiatricinpatientconsumers.Insomestatesprisonersarealsounderthreat.Smoking,albeitharmfultoone’shealth,isacommonrecreationalpastimeenjoyedbyanestimated17%ofthelargerpopulationofAustraliathatisnotsubjectedtoconfinement.Theattackontherighttochoosewithsmokingisjustasymptomofthesicknessinthehealthsector,wherethoseforwhomtheserviceisintendedreceivewhatothersdecideisgoodforthem.Wechallengethepolicyofdictatinglifestylestoconsumersinclosedinstitutions,
7 Seehttp://tiny.cc/0f5e0formoreonthispoint.8 Ibid.
The OUR PICK report 5
includingforcedmedicationtochangebehaviour.Wefocusontheforcedwithdrawaloftobaccoassymbolicofdishonestconcernforconsumers’welfarethatyieldscounterproductiveresults.Smokingisextremelyimportanttopatientsandprisoners.Fromourowninvestigationswehaveobservedthatmanyprisonersearnlessthan$20aweek,andspend$18ontobacco.Inprisonsandmentalhealthunitsover80%ofthepopulationsmokes.Itistheirhome.ItisapersonalpleasureacceptedsincetheformationofthePenalColony.JusticeActionstronglybelievesthattoimposesuchabanonaparticularlyvulnerablesectionofsocietywhenthesamebanisnotimposedonthelargercommunityisnotonlyundemocraticbutalsoimposesadisproportionatelevelofsufferingonthosewhoarealreadydisadvantaged.Evenpubsandcasinoshavespecialareasforsmokersdespitepatrons’abilitytogooutside.Thebanningoftobacco–consumers’legaldrugofchoice–fordependentpopulations,whilstforciblyimposingmedicationtolessentheresultingtrauma,isoutrageous.Itisinbreachofethics,lawsandcovenants,anddoesnotachieveitsstatedintention.9 Whilethegovernmentsaysitisconcernedaboutpatients’health,thebansdonotstopsmokinginthelongterm.Whereconsumersareforcedtogiveupsmokinginmentalhealthunits,mostresumesmokingimmediatelyupondischarge.Oneoftheworld’sleadingresearchersinthearea,SteveKiselyfromGriffithUniversityMedicalSchool,isadamantthatbansdonotwork,statingthatthemotivationtochangetheoryemphasisesthatmeaningfulchangewillonlyoccurwhenthepatienthasmovedthroughthepre-contemplative,contemplativeandplanningstagesthroughtotheactionstage.10 Itisclearthatthegovernmentpositioniswrongfromeveryperspective.Itisdishonest,ineffectiveandtriestoovercomethelittlecontrolthatprisonersandpatientshaveovertheirlives.Furthermore,ithasattemptedtosilencedissenters.InOctober2007,JusticeActionwasexcludedfromrepresentingconsumersatJusticeHealth’sConsumerandCommunityGroupfollowingpublicityonapossiblesmokingban.Astheonlyrepresentativewithprisonexperience,otherparticipantssaidJA’sinvolvementwasessential,buttheexclusioncontinues.Thelessonofthesmokingcasestudyisthatonlythroughworkingtogetherwithpatientsandprisonerscanchangesoccur.Thisattemptatabanprovidesanexcellentchancetoexaminegovernmentrehabilitationpoliciesgenerallyincludingwithprisoners,andwhytheyhavefailedsocomprehensively.Theeasytop-downdictatorialstyleofpeoplemanagementalwaysfails,absorbsscarceresourcesandcausesunnecessarytensions.Workingwithpeoplerequirespatienceandsensitivitybutismoreeffectiveinthelongrun.
Case study of Saeed Dezfouli TheclosedsystemoftheNSWHealthDepartment’smentalhospitalsisgettingexposurethroughthewindowofpatientSaeedDezfouli.Itshowssystemicabuseofdependentpeoplecloakedascare.Saeedpresentsnothreattothecommunity.HeneedssupportasanIranianrefugeeaffectedbystressandwithaheartcondition.In2002helitafireinhisworkplacetodrawattentiontohisconcerns.Thiswasfollowingmorethanfivemonthsofdistressedfaxestopoliceandpoliticiansinwhichhehadstatedhisintentions.Onthatdaythefireescapewaslockedandawomandiedofsmokeinhalation.Saeedregrettedhisactionimmediately,huggingthoseoutsidethebuilding.Thiswouldneverhavehappenedwithproperhealthandpoliceintervention.Saeedisinauniqueposition.Hehaswatchedthesystemfrominsideforeightyears,andpointsoutitshypocrisy,whilstJusticeHealth(anarmoftheHealthDepartment)triestocrushhimintosubmissionwiththerestofthepatients.Heisagentlepersonneverwantingtohurt
9 Seehttp://tiny.cc/gjdfqformoreonthispoint.10 TranscriptofemailreceivedbyJusticeActionMarch2008.
The OUR PICK report6
anyone–theyagreeheisnon-violent,buteverytwoweekseightstaffholdhimdownandinjecthimwithapowerfulsedativewhileheisheldinthehighestsecurityarea:theForensicHospital.Heisrefusedachoiceofpsychiatrist,educationandexercise,isnotpermittednewvisitorsandtherulesaren’tevenstated.WebecamehisPrimaryCarerwhentherewasnooneelse.Saeedissufferingbecausehewon’tshutup.JusticeHealthhasabsolutepower.Patientshavenofinitesentencesandaretotallydependentonthetreatingpsychiatrist.Theprinciplesofpatients’rightsunders68oftheMentalHealthAct2007(NSW) donotapplyinpractice.Inthis‘care’system,no-onecares.Taxpayersarecharged$200,000ayearforSaeed,and$130mforthenewprivatelyfinancedBayhospitals.SaeedappealedtotheSupremeCourtagainsttheMentalHealthReviewTribunal’srefusaltoorderchangestohistreatment.TheTribunalandtheAttorney-Generaltriedtoblockthisfirstrealappealagainstitsnewpowerstomakeorders,refusingtosupplyitsdecision,untilanaudiorecordprovedSaeed’sentitlement.ItseesitsroleassupportingJusticeHealthandnotmakingaseparatejudgment.PreviouslytheTribunalhadcalledforanewreviewofSaeedbutwasoverruledbyJusticeHealth.ThelackofcomplaintfromthosearoundSaeedshowswidespreadabuseandthecompromiseofthoseparticipatinginthehealthsystem.TheTribunaltriedtoforceSaeedtousethediscreditedMentalHealthAdvocacyService. WehaveajobandahomeforSaeed,andwillcontinuetheJusticeActionMentoringrelationshipwhichisfundedbyBreakoutDesignPrintWebwhenheisreleased.
Involuntary Injection MichaelHeston,aninvoluntarymentalhealthpatient,wrotethesewordstoMindFreedomaskingforhelp: “Lifeisnofunwhenbeingtorturedandterrorized.Pleasehelpme.Theyhavenorightto
shootme.Iwantmyspiritback.That’sallIwantismyspiritback.Thedrugsmakemenervousandparanoid.I’mfidgetyandantsyfromthemedicine.Godmademeacertainwayandthat’showIwanttostay.I’mbeingshotdownlikeadog.”11
Thesecommentsraisetheissueofeffectiveness,whichiscentraltoinvoluntarytreatmentregimes.AccordingtoDrPennyWeller,involuntarytreatmentscan“mask,ratherthanrelievethesymptomsofmentalillness.”12Shearguesthatsuchtreatmentsoftenhavesedativeeffects,whichareusedaschemicalrestraints.Atothertimes,theyhavedisablingsideeffectsthatmimicsymptomsofmentalillnesses,whichleadtointerpretationsbymedicalofficersthatpatients’behavioursreflectescalationsofmentalillness.Thesefindingshavefurthermorebeencomplementedbystudiesdoneinthisfield.Alarmingly,intheCochranereviewentitled“CompulsoryCommunityandInvoluntaryOutpatientTreatmentforPeoplewithSevereMentalDisorders”,itwasrevealedthatthereislittleevidencethatcommunitytreatmentordersareeffectiveforcompetenthealthcare.Thatstudyconcludedthatstatisticallyittakes85communitytreatmentorderstopreventonere-admission,27topreventonecaseofhomelessnessand238topreventonearrest.Thisastonishingevidenceisjustanotherindicationofwhyinvoluntarytreatmentisinappropriateformentalhealthpatients.Furthermore,itindicatesaclearwasteofpublicexpenditureinmentalhealthtreatment.Instead,suchfundingcouldbeusedtopromoteeffectivementalhealthcareinaccordancewithfundamentalhumanfreedoms,suchastreatmentwithfreeandinformedconsent.AccordingtoProfessorAmitaDhanda,ifmentalhealthpatientsrefusetreatments
11 MindFreedom.‘USAFederalPrisonerCommitsSuicideAfterForcedPsychiatricDrugs’[online]<http://www.mindfreedom.org/kb/prison-mental-health/forced- psychiatric-drugs/?searchterm=michael%20heston>(3May2010).
12 PennyWeller(2010)‘DevelopingLawandEthics:TheConventionontheRightsofPersonswithDisabilities,35Alternative Law Journal1,2.
The OUR PICK report 7
recommendedtothem,theyaredeemedtolackthecapacityorinsightintowhatareintheirbestinterestsfortreatment.Thismaybeeseenasthe‘catch-22’ofthementalhealthsystem.Itisclearthatthislogicdoesnotrealisethecapacityof“allpersons,whetherornottheyhaveadisability,aremoreorlessabletoreason”.13 Infact,patientsthemselvesarearguablythemostcapableofmakingdecisionsastowhetheratreatmentisintheirownbestinterests.However,inthecaseofthosetrulylackingthecapacitytomakefreeandinformeddecisions,substituteddecision-makingisstillnotappropriate.Instead,supporteddecision-makingismoredesirable.Thismeansthatmentalhealthpatientsshouldbeencouragedtoworkinconjunctionwithsupportpersonnelinordertocometoanadequatesolutionregardinghealthcare.Whileitistruethattheamountofsupportrequiredwouldvaryfrompatienttopatient,ifwearetorespectthehumanrightsofsociety’smostvulnerablefriends,suchanapproachisnecessary.Thepublicfundingcurrentlybeingwastedonunjustinvoluntarytreatmentregimescanbeutilisedinthiswaytoprovidemorerespectablegoals.InNSWmentalhealthconsumerscanbeinvoluntarilysedatedwhentheyareseenasaseriousrisktothemselvesorothersinapsychiatricemergency.14Thisisgovernedbystrictregulationsunderthe‘SeclusionPracticesinPsychiatricFacilities’DepartmentofHealthpolicy. 15Thispolicydirectivestates,“anyrestraintmustbeproportionaltotheactionsofthepatient.Anyactionoutofproportiontothedangertheyareplacingthemselvesorothersin,maybeconsideredanassault.”16Thus,criminalassaultisrelevantwheredisproportionateforceisusedinthesecircumstances.However,ifinvoluntarymedicationisdefinedas‘treatment’ratherthansedation,suchinterventionintendedonlyforpsychiatricemergenciesbecomesacommonplaceroutine.Thisisunacceptable-theseactionsshouldberegardedasassaults,andasdiscussedabove,areineffectiveabinitioandshouldhavenoplaceinthementalhealthsystem.Thus,onlythroughacceptingthelimitationsofinvoluntaryinjectingpowerscanmedicalpractitionersperformtheirrolesandrespecttherightsofmentalhealthconsumers.UnderArticle17oftheConventionontheRightsofPersonswithDisabilities(CRPD)“everypersonwithdisabilitieshasarighttorespectforhisorherphysicalandmentalintegrityonanequalbasiswithothers.”17Involuntaryinjectionisaninfringementofthisfundamentalhumanright.Thepointsjustoutlinedaimtoprovideajustalternativetooutdatedinvoluntarytreatmentregimesthatviolatementalhealthconsumers’rights.Forciblyholdingdownahumanbeingandinjectingthemwithdrugsagainsttheirwillbreachesallhumanrights.
Mental Health Consumers in the MediaThemediahasanenormousimpactonsocietyandhowpeopleperceivetheworldaroundthem;itcontributes,shapes,andformstheiropiniononimportantissues.Mentalhealthconsumersareportrayednegativelyinthemediadespitealldeclarations,conventions,andlegislationsthatexiststoprotectthem.Themedia’snegativityblatantlydefiestheCRPD,despitetheUN’sspecificpurposes“tolimitmechanismsthatreplicateandreinforcethesocialexclusionandmarginalizationofpeoplewithdisabilities.”18 Twentypercentofnewsarticlesthatcovermentalhealthconsumersusethewords“psycho”,
13 Ibid,3.14 MentalHealthAct2007(NSW)s14.15 NewSouthWalesHealth(2007)Seclusion Practices in Psychiatric Facilities[online]<http://www.health.
nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2007/PD2007_054.html>(22June2010).16 Ibid.17 UnitedNations,Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities(2008)art17.18 PenelopeWeller(2009)‘HumanRightsandSocialJusticeTheConventionontheRightsofPersonswith
DisabilitiesandtheQuietRevolutioninInternationalLaw’,4Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice, 5.
The OUR PICK report8
“schizo”and“nutter”.19Televisionnewsprograms,newspapers,andradioareconsideredtrustednewssourcestosociety,andsometimestheonlysourceofeducationtoitsviewers.Whenthesenewsoutletshighlightandexaggeratementalhealthconsumersandcrime,theyareonlyreinforcingthestigmasthatsocietyaccepts.Howeverstudieshaveshownthatevenwhenmentalhealthconsumersareportrayedcorrectly,itisonlythesortofarticlesthatdramatizethecircumstancesthatattractthemostattention.20AmericanconsumerandactivistRaeUnzickerwrote,“TobeamentalpatientistowatchTVandseehowviolentanddangerousanddumbandincompetentandcrazyyouare.”21
Seventypercentofthepopulationbelievesthatmentalhealthconsumersareviolentwhichreflectspublicconcernandgovernmentspendingonsecurity.ItwasfoundintheUnitedStatesthatmostmentalhealthpatientsinprisonwereuninsured,poor,homelessminoritygroupswhohadcommittedmisdemeanorcrimes.22Theyareunjustlycommittedascriminalsintotheprisonsystemtokeepthemawayfromasocietythattakesnoinitiativetounderstandthem.In1992BrianBurdekinreleasedthereport‘NationalInquiryIntoTheHumanRightsOfPeopleWithMentalIllness’.Hisreasonforconductingthisinquirycamefromevidencepresentedtothehomelesschildren’sinquiry,whichsuggestedthatinmanyareasthehumanrightsofindividualsaffectedbymentalillnesswerebeingignoredorseriouslyviolated.FurtherresearchbyBurdekinalsoindicatedwidespread:
l ignoranceaboutthenatureandprevalenceofmentalillnessinthecommunity; l discrimination; l misconceptionsaboutthenumberofpeoplewithamentalillnesswhoare
dangerous,and; l beliefsthatfewpeopleaffectedbymentalillnesseverrecover.
TheMHCA/HREOCreport:“NotForService:ExperiencesofInjusticeandDespairinMentalHealthCareinAustralia”showedthatafter12yearsofmentalhealthreforminAustralia,anypersonseekingmentalhealthcarerunstheseriousriskthathisorherbasicneedswillbeignored,trivialisedorneglected.Theadversehealth,socialandeconomiceffectsofAustralia‘smentalhealthcaresystemfallslargelyonthosewithrecurrentorchronicdisordersandtheirfamiliesandcarers.Thesearesomeofthemostvulnerablepeopleinourcommunity.
The Judicial SystemAtlaw,personssufferingarecognisedmentalillnessatthetimeofanoffencearenotcriminallyliablefortheiractions.23Despitethis,forensicconsumerscontinuetobeincarceratedforlongerthaniftheyhadbeenfoundguiltyofacriminaloffence,particularlywheretheywishtoalterorceasetreatment.Involuntarypatientsalsosufferfromlackofchoiceintreatmentasaresultofassumedincapacity,asdiscussedbelow.
Forensic patientsIndeterminingwhetherapersoncanbefoundnotguiltyofanoffencebyreasonofmentalillness,thecourtmustfindthatthestateofthepersonsmindatthetimeoftheoffencewas
19 DanielleAndrewartha(2010)“WorldWillNeverHurt?MediastigmatisationofpeoplewithmentalillnessesintheCriminalJusticeContext”,35Alternative Law Journal 1,4.
20 Ibid.21 RaeUnzicker(1984)“To Be A Mental Patient”,NationalAssociationforRightsProtectionandAdvocacy,
<http://www.narpa.org/to_be_a_Mental_Patient.htm/>(11May2010).22 Weller,aboven18,5.23 Rather,theywillbenotguiltybyreasonofmentalillnessunderMentalHealth(ForensicProvisions)Act
1990(NSW)s38.
The OUR PICK report 9
diseased,disorderedordisturbedtosuchadegreethatitpreventedthemfromunderstandingthephysicalnatureoftheunlawfulactorrecognisingthattheoffendingactitselfwaswrong.24 Ifthisisfound,thecourtwillorderthatthepersonberecognisedasnotguiltybyreasonofmentalillnessornotfittobetriedanddetained.TheMentalHealthTribunalmaymakeanorderforreleasefromcustody“whensatisfiedonthebalanceofprobabilitiesthatthesafetyofthepersonoranymemberofthepublicwillnotbeseriouslyendangered”25and“whereothercareofalessrestrictivekind,thatisconsistentwithsafeandeffectivecare,isappropriateandreasonablyavailabletothepatientorthatthepatientdoesnotrequirecare”.26 Despitetheseavenuesfordischarge,manyforensicpatientswillremaininmentalhealthfacilitieslongaftertheircriminalcounterpartsdespitethefacttheyarenotguiltybylawofanoffence.Theyareseentolackthecapacitytomakedecisionsfortheirownmedicaltreatment.Thereisnochoiceinthissystem.
Involuntary patientsApersonmayalsobeadmittedtoamentalhealthfacilityaftertheissueofamentalhealthcertificatebyanaccreditedpersonincircumstanceswherethepersonisfoundtobeamentallyillordisordered,andwhereinvoluntaryadmissionanddetentionisdeemednecessary.27
Unders14oftheMentalHealthAct2007(NSW)apersonismentallyillifthepersonissufferingfrommentalillnessandowingtothatillness,therearereasonablegroundsforbelievingthatcare,treatmentorcontrolofthepersonisnecessaryfortheprotectionofthepersonorothersfromseriousharm.ResearcherAmitaDhandahasidentifiedthattestsof‘capacity’havebeenentrenchedintowesternlegalsystemsinordertopromoteefficientcompliancewithpsychiatrictreatmentwithoutreferencetoindividual’srightsandchoiceoftreatment.28Forexample,the‘status’teststatesthatwhereapersonsuffersfromaseverementalillness,theywillautomaticallylackthecapacitytoinvolvethemselvesintheirtreatment.The‘outcome’testinamedicalcontextdictatesthatwhereconsumersrefusetreatment,thiswillbeseenasanindicationoftheirlackofcapacity.29
Therefore,ifapersonacceptspsychiatrictreatment,heorsheisdeemedtohavecapacityandwillbeadmittedtoavoluntarytreatmentprogram,ofwhichtheymaydischargethemselvesatanytime.However,iftheydonotfeeltreatmentisnecessary,theywillbesubjectedtoincarcerationandinvoluntarytreatment.Thesemethodsservetocrushmentalhealthsufferersintosubmissionforthepurposeofachievingaquickandefficientprocesswithoutsubstantialconsiderationsofpatientsrighttoinvolvementorchoiceintheirtreatment.
24 R v Porter(1933)55CLR182.25 MentalHealth(ForensicProvisions)Act1990(NSW)s39.26 MentalHealth(ForensicProvisions)Act1990(NSW)s43.27 MentalHealthAct2007(NSW)s19.28 AmitaDhanda(2005)‘TheRighttoTreatmentofPersonswithPsychosocialDisabilitiesandtheRoleofthe
Courts’28International Journal of Law and Psychiatry155,157.29 Weller,aboven12,2.
The OUR PICK report10
Section 2: Mechanisms for Operation in Practice Thefollowingsectionfocusesontherolesofnon-governmentorganisationsasmechanismsforassertingtherightssupposedlyaffordedtoconsumers.Italsoexaminestheeffectivenessofcurrentgovernmentfundingprograms.ThefollowingistakenfromtheNSWMentalHealthCharter30forcarethathasderivedfromnegotiationswithconsumergroups.Accordingtothischarter,whichisontheNSWHealthwebsite,allNSWconsumersareentitledtoservicesthatabidebytheseguidelines.1. Respecthumanrights.2. Arecompassionateandsensitivetotheneedsoftheindividualstheyserve.3. Fosterpositiveattitudestomentalhealthinthelargercommunity.4. Promotepositivementalhealth.5. Encouragetrueconsumerinvolvementatalllevelsofservicedeliveryandpolicy
development.6. Provideeffectivetreatmentandcareacrossthelifespan.7. Arewidelyaccessibletopeoplewithmentalhealthneeds.8. Providecareintheleastrestrictiveenvironment,consistentwithtreatmentrequirements.9. Provideeffectiveandcomprehensivepreventionprogramsacrossthelifespan.10. Promote‘livingwell’withmentalillness.11. Addressqualityoflifeissuessuchasaccommodation,education,workandincome,
leisureandsport,homeandfamilyandotherrelationships.12. Uselanguagethatreducesstigma,discrimination,ornegativityforthoseaffectedand
theirfamilies.13. Respectandareresponsivetothediversityinlifestyle,sexualityandsexualpreference.14. Areculturallysensitiveandappropriatetotheneedsoftheindividualstheyserve.Despitetheflowerylanguageinlegislationandmotives,theNSWJusticeHealthispartofthe“system”andthesystemhasitsownagendasthataremaskedbywordsconsumersarefightingtohearinabrokensystemthatlimitsthem.Infact,theprovisionsoftheMentalHealthActservetohindertheachievementoftheaimsstatedabove.
Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW)IntheMentalHealthActthereexiststhepotentialforabuseofpower.ItstatesinitsobjectivesthattheActprovidesthecare,treatment,andcontrolofpersonswhoarementallyillormentallydisordered.31ThefactthatNSWJusticeHealthdeliberatelyincludedtherighttocontrolmentalhealthconsumersintheobjectivesoftheActreinforcesandprovidesjustificationtosociety’sstereotypeofmetalhealthconsumersaspeopletobecontainedandisolatedfromthemainstreamcommunity.IfthegoalsofNSWJusticeHealthistoprovidementalhealthservicesthatamongotherthings,respecthumanrights,arecompassionateandsensitivetotheneedsoftheindividualstheyserve,andfosterpositiveattitudestomentalhealthinthelargercommunity,thenslipping
30 NSWDepartmentofHealth(2000)Charter for Mental Health Care in NSW[online]http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2000/mhcharter.html(3May2010).
31 ContainedintheMentalHealthAct2007(NSW).
The OUR PICK report 11
thewordcontrolintotheverycatalystoftrustbetweenauthoritiesandconsumerscontradictsthesupposedintentions.Theuseofthewordcontrolisadeliberatemanipulationofpowerandaviolationofmentalhealthconsumer’sinherenthumanrights.
Consumer and Carer OrganisationsConsumerandcarers’organisationsareusedasthemechanismfortheassertionofrightsofconsumersinthissystem.Essentially,therearetwotypesofconsumerorganisationsdiscussedinthispaper:non-governmentandgrassrootsconsumergroups.Thereisoneunderliningdifferencebetweenthetwo:funding.Withoutthefundingfromthementalhealthdepartmentandaccesstothehospitals,itisdifficultfororganizationstobeeffective.Unfortunately,whenorganisationsacceptfinancialassistance,theiractionsarelimitedinthementalhealthmovementandmustturnablindeyetotheinjustices,orlosetheirfunding.Itisthisissuewhichmustbechangedinordertotrulypursueeffectiveprotectionofconsumerrightsinthisfield:mandatoryfundingmustbeallocatedtoindependent consumergroupsinordertoadequatelyachievethisgoal.
Funded Organisations:TheMentalHealthCoordinatingCouncilisthecoordinatingorganizationfornon-governmentorganizationsinmentalhealthservicesinNSW.Theirpurposeistoseektoimprove,promoteanddevelopqualitymentalhealthservicestothecommunity.Theirgoalisalsotoextensivelyparticipateandinfluencepolicymakerstoimprovementalhealthcare.
Non-funded Organisations:Criticalorganisationsthatdonotreceivefundingfromthegovernmentarethemosteffectiveatthepresenttime.Asaresulttheyhavetheabilitytopursuementalhealthgoalswithoutanyoutsideinfluences.Theconsumerorganisation’smovementisledby(mostimportantly)mentalhealthconsumersaswellascarers,familymembers,doctorsandothersfromthebottomwhobelievethereisanalternativewaytoworkingwithmentalhealthpatientsinsteadoftheHealthDepartmenttakingresponsibilityfromthetop.JusticeActionhasbecomeinvolvedduetoourconcernaboutgovernmentabuseofpower.ThehalfwayhouseGlebeHousewhichwasfoundedbytheprisonermovementlostitsfundingduetothecriticaladvocacyworkofitsDirectors.AmericanactivistRaeUnzickerandEnglishactivistR.D.Lainghavemadesignificantcontributionstothemovementofconfrontingmentalhealthauthorities.ToLaing,consumer’sbehaviorswerearesponsetotheirinabilitytoconformtosociety’sdemandsinthechangingworld.Hisideasoftreatmentstemmedfromthebeliefthatconsumersareresponsiblefortheirownprogress,andthroughtheirprogresstheywouldbeabletoreturntoamorestableandgroundedlife.RaeUnzicker,anAmericanadvocateformentalhealthconsumers,sawmentalhealthinasimilarway.Moreimportantly,shebelieveditwasinexcusabletodenymentalhealthconsumerstheirrights,particularlythefreedomtochoosehowandwhereconsumerswillreceivetreatment,ifany.ConsumerorganizationstodaycontinueLaingandUnzicker’sworkandtheirvoicesarefarfromsilent.GroupssuchasTheConsumerActivityNetwork(www.canmentalhealth.org),TheIcarusProject(www.icarusproject.net),Mindfreedom(www.mindfreedom.org),andMadPride(www.mindfreedom.org/campaign/madpride)havealladdressedtheirissuesandconcernspubliclyinregardstomentalhealth.Mindfreedomspecificallyadvocatestherighttochooseasoneoftheirmainprioritiesinthementalhealthcaresystem.Thisorganisationaimstoestablishtheconsumer’scontrolover
The OUR PICK report12
theirlifeandtohavetheiropinionsconsidered.TheConsumerActivityNetwork(CAN)focusesontherightofconsumerstobeinvolvedinthedecision-makingprocessoftreatmentaspartoftheindividual’srecoveryjourney.Thisisseenasimportantsoastoallowtheconsumeraqualitylifestyleofchoice.TheIcarusProjectadvocatesaslightlydifferentmessage.Notonlydotheysupporttherighttochoosethemethodoftreatment,theyalsoadvocatetherighttonotbecategorizedasillinthefirstplace.Thebeliefofthisparticularorganizationisthatpersonswhoarelabeledmentallyillarereallypeoplewhoareabletoseetheworldinawaythatdoesnotconformtosociety’sviewof“normal”and“sane”.
Section 3: Key Charters and LegislationThefollowinginternationalcovenantsanddomesticlegislationareprovidedbelowsoastohighlightthedifferencesbetweentheobligationsoftheAustraliangovernmentunderinternationallawandtheobligationsofJusticeHealthunderdomesticlawincomparisontocurrentpracticesexperiencedbyconsumers.UN High Commissioner for Human Rights32
“Australia,beingadualistnation,needstoincorporaterightsencompassedbythosetreatiesintodomesticlawtomakethemdirectlyjusticiable.Currently,noneoftheaforementionedtreatieshasbeenentirelylegislativelyincorporatedintoAustralianlaw.TheSpecialRapporteurregretsthatthereisnosuchformalrecognitionoftherighttohealthinAustralia.“United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)ThefollowingarticlesfromthisDeclarationmaybeappliedspecificallytothecaseofpatientswithamentalillness.However,allthearticlesundertheUniversalDeclarationofHumanRightsareunderstoodtobetherightsofmentalillnesspatients.
l Allhumanbeingsarebornfreeandequalindignityandrights(Article1). l Everyoneisentitledtorightsandfreedomwithoutdiscriminationandeveryonehasthe
righttolife,libertyandsecurity(Article2). l Nooneshallbesubjectedtotortureortocruel,inhumanordegradingtreatmentor
punishment(Article5). l Allareequalbeforethelawandareentitledwithoutanydiscriminationtoequalprotection
ofthelaw(Article7). l Nooneshallbesubjectedtoarbitraryinterferencewithhisprivacy,family,homeor
correspondenceortoattacksuponhishonourandreputation.(Article12). l Everyonehastherighttoastandardoflivingadequateforthehealthandwell-beingof
himselfincludingfood,clothing,housingandmedicalcareandnecessarysocialservices,andtherighttosecurity…(Article25).
l Everyonehastherighttoaneducation.(Article26).
32 UnitedNationsOfficeoftheHighCommissionerforHumanRights(2009)Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health(AnandGrover)
The OUR PICK report 13
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007)ThisConvention(CRPD)doesnotintroduceanynewrights,butholdsnationsresponsibletoprotectthosewhoseopportunitiestopursueafulfillinglifehasbeenlessenedduetodiscrimination.33Onceacountryratifiestheconvention,itisrequiredofthatnationtostartimplementingappropriatelegislation.Australiaratifiedtheconventionon17July,2008.Personswithdisabilitiesincludethosewhohavelong-termphysical,mental,intellectual,orsensoryimpairmentswhichininteractionwithvariousbarriersmayhindertheirfullandeffectiveparticipationinsocietyonanequalbasiswithothers(Article1).Itisclearthatmentalhealthpatientsareincludedinpersonswithdisabilitiesandshouldbetreatedassuch.
l HealthandTreatment(Article9) l StatesPartiesrecognizethatpersonswithdisabilitieshavetherighttotheenjoymentof
thehighestattainablestandardofhealthwithoutdiscriminationonthebasisofdisability. l Equalrecognitionbeforethelaw(Article12)StatesPartiesshalltakeappropriate
measurestoprovideaccessbypersonswithdisabilitiestothesupporttheymayrequireinexercisingtheirlegalcapacity
l FreedomfromExploitation,ViolenceandAbuse(Article16)StatePartiesshalltakeallappropriatelegislative,administrative,social,educational,andothermeasurestoprotectpersonwithdisabilities,bothwithinandoutsidethehome,fromallformsofexploitation,violenceandabuse,includingtheirgender-basedaspects.Inordertopreventtheoccurrenceofallformsofexploitation,violenceandabuse. States Parties shall ensure that all facilities and programs designed to serve persons with disabilities are effectively monitored by independent authorities.
l Protectingtheintegrityoftheperson(Article17)Everypersonwithdisabilitieshasarighttorespectforhisorherphysicalandmentalintegrityonanequalbasiswithothers.
l RehabilitationandCare(Article26)Eachandeveryindividualhastherighttomentalhealthservicesthatarecompassionateandsensitivetothepatients’needsandcare.InrelationtotheDeclarationofHumanRights,forensicmentalhealthpatientsshouldnotbesubjectedtocruel,punishmentordegradingtreatment.
l Education(Article24)StatesPartiesrecognizetherightofpersonswithdisabilitiestoeducation.
l RighttoHealth(Article25)StatesPartiesrecognizethatpersonswithdisabilitieshavetherighttotheenjoymentofthehighestattainablestandardofhealthwithoutdiscriminationonthebasisofdisability.StatesPartiesshalltakeallappropriatemeasurestoensureaccessforpersonswithdisabilitiestohealthservicesthataregender-sensitive,includinghealth-relatedrehabilitation.
Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth)WhiletheaimofthisActistoidentifytherightsofmentalhealthpatients,itprohibitstheconsumer’sownassertionofrightsandleavesallpowersofthematterinthehandsoftheDepartmentofHealth.
33 UnitedNations,Why a Convention? (2006)[online]at<http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/questions.shtml>(3May2010).
The OUR PICK report14
Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW)34
ThisActlaysoutpowersandobligationstothegovernmenttofacilitatecare,treatmentandcontrolofmentalhealthpatientswhileprotectingtheirhumanrights.Again,thisActfailstoempowerconsumerswiththerighttoaddresstheirownhealth.Instead,throughthisActitistheresponsibilityofauthoritarianfiguresatthetoptodeterminewhattheybelieveisbestfortheconsumers.
s 1: Objects of the Act: (a) provideforthecare,treatmentandcontrolofpersonswhoarementallyillormentally
disordered(d) whileprotectingthecivilrightsofthosepersons,togiveanopportunityforthosepersons
tohaveaccesstoappropriatecare,and(e) tofacilitatetheinvolvementofthosepersons,andpersonscaringforthem,indecisions
involvingappropriatecare,treatmentandcontrol.
s 68: Principles for care and rehabilitation (a) peoplewithamentalillnessormentaldisordershouldreceivethebestpossiblecare
andtreatmentintheleastrestrictiveenvironmentenablingthecareandtreatmenttobeeffectivelygiven,
(d) theprescriptionofmedicinetoapersonwithamentalillnessormentaldisordershouldmeetthehealthneedsofthepersonandshouldbegivenonlyfortherapeuticordiagnosticneedsandnotasapunishmentorfortheconvenienceofothers
(e) peoplewithamentalillnessormentaldisordershouldbeprovidedwithappropriateinformationabouttreatment,treatmentalternativesandtheeffectsoftreatment,
ConclusionThelanguageauthoritieshaveusedintheirlegislationisdeceivingtoconstituents.Thepoliticalgametheyplaywhenusingsuchflowerylanguageonlybenefitstheirpersonalinterests.Inrealityauthoritiesgivementalhealthpatientslittlerespectfortheirrightsandinmanycasesletthemwasteawaywithlittlecommunicationorstimulation.Taxpayerscontribute$205,000perpatientperyear.Theirmoneyisbeingwastedandusedforabuse.Thelossofcontrolmentalhealthconsumershaveregardingtheirhealthisdisturbingonallaccounts.Consumershavetherighttotakeallmethodsoftreatmentintoconsideration,includingnotreatmentatall,withouttheoverbearinginfluenceofthegovernment,psychiatrists,anddrugcompanies.Nomatterhowtheirconditionsarediagnosed,thewesternmethodoftreatmentshouldnotbetheonlymethodtakenintoconsideration.Itistherightofthepatientstohaveallmethodsconsideredandtobethefinalauthorityoverthemselvesinthedecisionofwhichmethodtopursue.Alsoofequalimportance,mentalhealthpatientspossessthesamehumanrightsaseveryindividualintheworld.Theyshouldbetreatedasequalsandtheirdifferencesshouldnotbeexploitedorusedfordiscrimination.
34 s76BofMentalHealthForensicProvisionsAct1990(NSW) referstos68oftheMentalHealthActandstatesthattheprinciplesofcareandrehabilitationappliestoforensicpatientsaswellasvoluntarypatients.
● Iranian refugee● Mental health patient costing $200,000 a year● Not guilty due to mental illness● Lit a fire in his workplace to draw attention – woman died● Gentle person – Intended no harm – warned police who ignored him
Saeed Dezfouli
● Health Department breaches its obligation of care – they don’t like him● Locked in cell for eight years● Highest security area● Forcibly injected every fortnight, yet non violent – breaches UN Conventions● Refused education● Refused psychiatrist change● Refused access support
Action!Sign petitionDonate to campaignAppeal launched to Supreme Courtwww.justiceaction.org.au02 9283 0123
The Right to Choose
top related