tailoring innovation to achieve financially-viable energy ... · management fact sheet: energy...

Post on 23-Jul-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Tailoring Innovation to Achieve Financially-Viable Energy and Nutrient Recovery from Wastewater

Jeremy Guest Assistant Professor Civil & Environmental Engineering 3221 Newmark Civil Engineering Lab jsguest@illinois.edu

Government Affairs Conference IWEA

January 23, 2015

create perceived value with technologies that are:financially viableenergy positivenutrient recoveringsustainableenvironmental, economic, and social capacity to endure

water foodenergy health

Our central goal is to increase access to and the sustainability of sanitation.

We integrate experimentation, modeling, and quantitative sustainable design (QSD) for technology development.

EX

PER

IMEN

TA

TION M

OD

ELING

QUANTITATIVE SUSTAINABLE D

ESIGN

MODEL DEVELOPMENT >> << EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MODELED PERFO

RMANCE >>

<<

OBSE

RVED

PER

FORM

ANCE

<< EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MODEL REFINEMENT >>

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION

PLATFORM

<<

EXP

ERIM

ENTA

TION >> << M

OD

ELING

>>

<< QU

ANTITATIVE SUSTAINABLE D

ESIG

N >

>

MO

DEL

DEVE

LOPMENT >>

<< EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

MODELED PERFORMANCE >>

<

< O

BSER

VED

PERFO

RMANCE

<< EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MODEL REFINEMENT >>

EX

PER

IMEN

TA

TION

M

OD

ELING

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

MODEL DEVELOPMENT >> << EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MODELED PERFO

RMANCE >>

<<

OBSE

RVED

PER

FORM

ANCE

<< EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MODEL REFINEMENT >>

QUANTITATIVE

Guest Research Group

phototrophic

stormwater

drinking water

wastewater

agriculture

existing anaerobic

We integrate experimentation, modeling, and quantitative sustainable design (QSD) for technology development.

wastewater as a renewable resource

elucidating sustainability trade-offs

tailoring innovation

economics engineering environment

Today I’ll focus on QSD and the development of an anaerobic technology.

Treatment plants consume ~1-3% of U.S. electricity to decrease the energetic content of WW.

Treatment plants consume ~1-3% of U.S. electricity to decrease the energetic content of WW.

maps.google.com

~40-115 x 109 MWh/year a

a Based on EPA estimates that include industrial wastewaters [USEPA, Wastewater Management Fact Sheet: Energy Conservation, Office of Water, 2006].b Based on many life cycle assessments that have been completed around the treatment plant itself, normalized to a per capita equivalent based on typical wastewater generation rates.

~0.15-0.30 GJ/capita-year b

~40-80 kWh/capita-year b

R&D on energy production has focused on conversion of organic-C to usable energy.

ASBR - Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor

UASB - Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket

ABR - Anaerobic Baffled Reactor

AFB - Anaerobic Fluidized Bed

AnMBR - Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor

MEC - Microbial Electrolysis Cell

MFC - Microbial Fuel Cell

R&D on energy production has focused on conversion of organic-C to usable energy.

2000

[Shoener et al. (2014) Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts; 16(6): 1204-1222]

11[Shoener et al. (2014) Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts; 16(6): 1204-1222]

GJ capita-year

~1

~2-5

~0.4

Maximizing nutrient and energy recovery would integrate anaerobic and phototrophic processes.

2000

[Shoener et al. (2014) Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts; 16(6): 1204-1222]

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) can achieve high levels of COD removal.

Existing AnMBR designs could be very expensive and won’t be energy positive.

[Shoener et al. (2014) Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts; 16(6): 1204-1222]

How do we design and operate an AnMBR to enable affordable, energy positive wastewater treatment?

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)]

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

REACTOR TYPE A

MEMBRANE TYPE C

MEMBRANE MATERIAL D

CONFIGURATION B

Flat Sheet Hollow Fiber

PHYSICAL CLEANING E

AeF or GAC?

GAC dose

GAC

Submerged

Cross-flow

Aerobic Filter

AeF

N

Start

Specific Gas Demand

Sparging Frequency

Multi-tube

C S

Cross-flow Velocity

SOLUBLE METHANE MANAGEMENT F

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

CSTR

Anaerobic Filter

S

C

AF

AF

With GAC?

N

Y

Degassing Membrane

C

S

Cross-flow

Submerged

Invalid Design

AF Anaerobic Filter

CS CSTR

No Recovery

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

REACTOR TYPE A

MEMBRANE TYPE C

MEMBRANE MATERIAL D

CONFIGURATION B

Flat Sheet Hollow Fiber

PHYSICAL CLEANING E

AeF or GAC?

GAC dose

GAC

Submerged

Cross-flow

Aerobic Filter

AeF

N

Start

Specific Gas Demand

Sparging Frequency

Multi-tube

C S

Cross-flow Velocity

SOLUBLE METHANE MANAGEMENT F

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

CSTR

Anaerobic Filter

S

C

AF

AF

With GAC?

N

Y

Degassing Membrane

C

S

Cross-flow

Submerged

Invalid Design

AF Anaerobic Filter

CS CSTR

No Recovery

144 discrete designs

infinite number of design and operating conditions

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)]

How do we design and operate an AnMBR to enable affordable, energy positive wastewater treatment?

wastewater as a renewable resource

elucidating sustainability trade-offs

tailoring innovation

economics engineering environment

Today I’ll focus on QSD and the development of an anaerobic technology.

What is sustainable design?“…meets  the  needs  of  the  present  without  compromising  the  

ability  of  future  genera9ons  to  meet  their  own  needs.”in  theory

[World  Commission  on  Environment  &  Development,  1987]

today future  genera/onpast future

?

decision  maker

triple  bo4om  line  (TBL)

decision  maker  ? environmental

economic

social

func9onal

decision-­‐making  criteriain  prac/ce

17

economicfunc/onal

We  started  by  developing  a  qualita/ve  planning  and  design  process  to  address  social  factors.

environmentalsocial

18[Guest et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (16), 2009]

[Guest  et  al.,  Environ.  Sci.  Technol.  43(16),  2009]

[Guest  et  al.,  Water  Sci.  Technol.  61(6),  2010]

The  quan/ta/ve  backbone  of  this  larger  design  process  can  drive  technology  innova/on.

economicfunc/onal

environmental

19[Guest et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (16), 2009]

social

First, we need to define our design/innovation challenge.

[HRSD]'

Chesapeake(Elizabeth/WWTP/

First, we need to define our design/innovation challenge.

effluent quality

footprint

operational labor

capital costs

risk[HRSD]'

Chesapeake(Elizabeth/WWTP/

constraints

First, we need to define our design/innovation challenge.

[HRSD]'

Chesapeake(Elizabeth/WWTP/

“minimize cost”

“minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions”

“minimize cost & GHG emissions”

“minimize likelihood of permit violations”

constraintsobjective

risk, water quality, cost, etc.

First, we need to define our design/innovation challenge.

[HRSD]'

Chesapeake(Elizabeth/WWTP/

vs.

configuration/material 1 configuration/material 2

constraintsobjective

risk, water quality, cost, etc.

decision variables (DV)discrete

minimize cost & GHG emissions

First, we need to define our design/innovation challenge.

constraints[HRSD]'

Chesapeake(Elizabeth/WWTP/

objectivedecision variables (DV)discretecontinuous

configuration/material 1 or 2

internal recycle flow rateQ 4Q

risk, water quality, cost, etc.

minimize cost & GHG emissions

Sustainable design is a process to navigate trade-offs and set targets under uncertainty.

technology  A

select    decision  variables conceptual/detailed  

design  of  technology

func/onal environmental economic socialperformance  feasibility  

manageability

local  impacts  life  cycle  impacts

life  cycle  costs stakeholder  influence  on  

decision-­‐making

stakeholder+par-cipa-on+

decision+analysis+

A+

B+

C+

D+

E+

B+op-mal+design+

WWTP$designs$

Start with a model to predict the performance of the technology.

26

func/onal environmental economic social

this can be any kind of process model that predicts performance

We quantify global environmental impacts using life cycle assessment (LCA).

27

func/onal environmental economic social

construction operation

We use established cost equations for life cycle costing (LCC).

28

func/onal environmental economic social

[U.S.%EPA,%1982]%

cost equations sensitivity & uncertainty analyses

life cycle costs ($)

Designers can also identify tensions and synergies across decision variables.

low high

life cycle costs effluent contaminants

global warming potential

DV 2

DV 1 DV 1 DV 1

wastewater as a renewable resource

elucidating sustainability trade-offs

tailoring innovation

economics engineering environment

Today I’ll focus on QSD and the development of an anaerobic technology.

How do we design and operate an AnMBR to be financially viable and environmentally sustainable?

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

REACTOR TYPE A

MEMBRANE TYPE C

MEMBRANE MATERIAL D

CONFIGURATION B

Flat Sheet Hollow Fiber

PHYSICAL CLEANING E

AeF or GAC?

GAC dose

GAC

Submerged

Cross-flow

Aerobic Filter

AeF

N

Start

Specific Gas Demand

Sparging Frequency

Multi-tube

C S

Cross-flow Velocity

SOLUBLE METHANE MANAGEMENT F

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

CSTR

Anaerobic Filter

S

C

AF

AF

With GAC?

N

Y

Degassing Membrane

C

S

Cross-flow

Submerged

Invalid Design

AF Anaerobic Filter

CS CSTR

No Recovery

144 discrete designs

infinite number of design and operating conditions

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)][Pretel et al. (submitted)]

How do we design and operate an AnMBR to be financially viable and environmentally sustainable?

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

REACTOR TYPE A

MEMBRANE TYPE C

MEMBRANE MATERIAL D

CONFIGURATION B

Flat Sheet Hollow Fiber

PHYSICAL CLEANING E

AeF or GAC?

GAC dose

GAC

Submerged

Cross-flow

Aerobic Filter

AeF

N

Start

Specific Gas Demand

Sparging Frequency

Multi-tube

C S

Cross-flow Velocity

SOLUBLE METHANE MANAGEMENT F

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

CSTR

Anaerobic Filter

S

C

AF

AF

With GAC?

N

Y

Degassing Membrane

C

S

Cross-flow

Submerged

Invalid Design

AF Anaerobic Filter

CS CSTR

No Recovery

144 discrete designs infinite number of design and operating conditions

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)] [Pretel et al. (submitted)]

experimentation + modeling

selecting a configuration

developing a detailed design

CH4 N,&P

Anaerobic&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&reactor

SGD MLSS

Energy&recovery&from&biogas&producAon Waste&Sludge&transport&

and&disposal Nutrient&recovery Energy&recovery&

from&soluble&CH4

Qinfluent&+Qrecycling

&&&&Qrecycling Qinfluent

Qgas

SRT R

Qwaste

Qeffluent

J20

[13Q70]&days [0.5Q8]& [0.05Q0.3]&m3Wm2WhQ1& [80Q120]&%& [5Q25]&gWLQ1&

LEGEND&

ConAnous&decision&variables

Discrete&decision&variables

&

Process&

Membrane&tank

Bench scale reactors were run at KAUST the Urbana WWTP, a pilot-scale system was operated at Carraixet WWTP (Valencia, Spain).

Photo by Na Kyung Kim, UIUC

CH4 N,&P

Anaerobic&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&reactor

SGD MLSS

Energy&recovery&from&biogas&producAon Waste&Sludge&transport&

and&disposal Nutrient&recovery Energy&recovery&

from&soluble&CH4

Qinfluent&+Qrecycling

&&&&Qrecycling Qinfluent

Qgas

SRT R

Qwaste

Qeffluent

J20

[13Q70]&days [0.5Q8]& [0.05Q0.3]&m3Wm2WhQ1& [80Q120]&%& [5Q25]&gWLQ1&

LEGEND&

ConAnous&decision&variables

Discrete&decision&variables

&

Process&

Membrane&tank

[Ruth Pretel Jolis]

Experimental data was leveraged to predict the design of full-scale systems.

CH4 N,&P

Anaerobic&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&reactor

SGD MLSS

Energy&recovery&from&biogas&producAon Waste&Sludge&transport&

and&disposal Nutrient&recovery Energy&recovery&

from&soluble&CH4

Qinfluent&+Qrecycling

&&&&Qrecycling Qinfluent

Qgas

SRT R

Qwaste

Qeffluent

J20

[13Q70]&days [0.5Q8]& [0.05Q0.3]&m3Wm2WhQ1& [80Q120]&%& [5Q25]&gWLQ1&

LEGEND&

ConAnous&decision&variables

Discrete&decision&variables

&

Process&

Membrane&tank

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)]

When every design is evaluated under uncertainty, we identify which configurations should be pursued.

Once we identify a configuration, the relative importance of detailed design & operational decisions.

[Pretel et al. (submitted)]

MLSS mixed liquor suspended solids

SRT solids residence time

r internal recycle ratio

J membrane flux

SGD specific gas demand

[Pretel et al. (submitted)]

Once we identify a configuration, the relative importance of detailed design & operational decisions.

Through QSD identify tensions and synergies in design, enabling us to navigate trade-offs.

[Pretel et al. (submitted)]

This enables utilities to identify financially viable and environmentally sustainable technologies and designs.

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)] [Pretel et al. (submitted)]

experimentation + modeling

selecting a configuration

developing a detailed design

CH4 N,&P

Anaerobic&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&reactor

SGD MLSS

Energy&recovery&from&biogas&producAon Waste&Sludge&transport&

and&disposal Nutrient&recovery Energy&recovery&

from&soluble&CH4

Qinfluent&+Qrecycling

&&&&Qrecycling Qinfluent

Qgas

SRT R

Qwaste

Qeffluent

J20

[13Q70]&days [0.5Q8]& [0.05Q0.3]&m3Wm2WhQ1& [80Q120]&%& [5Q25]&gWLQ1&

LEGEND&

ConAnous&decision&variables

Discrete&decision&variables

&

Process&

Membrane&tank

This enables utilities to identify financially viable and environmentally sustainable technologies and designs.

[Shoener et al. (in preparation)] [Pretel et al. (submitted)]

CH4 N,&P

Anaerobic&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&reactor

SGD MLSS

Energy&recovery&from&biogas&producAon Waste&Sludge&transport&

and&disposal Nutrient&recovery Energy&recovery&

from&soluble&CH4

Qinfluent&+Qrecycling

&&&&Qrecycling Qinfluent

Qgas

SRT R

Qwaste

Qeffluent

J20

[13Q70]&days [0.5Q8]& [0.05Q0.3]&m3Wm2WhQ1& [80Q120]&%& [5Q25]&gWLQ1&

LEGEND&

ConAnous&decision&variables

Discrete&decision&variables

&

Process&

Membrane&tank

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

REACTOR TYPE A

MEMBRANE TYPE C

MEMBRANE MATERIAL D

CONFIGURATION B

Flat Sheet Hollow Fiber

PHYSICAL CLEANING E

AeF or GAC?

GAC dose

GAC

Submerged

Cross-flow

Aerobic Filter

AeF

N

Start

Specific Gas Demand

Sparging Frequency

Multi-tube

C S

Cross-flow Velocity

SOLUBLE METHANE MANAGEMENT F

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

CSTR

Anaerobic Filter

S

C

AF

AF

With GAC?

N

Y

Degassing Membrane

C

S

Cross-flow

Submerged

Invalid Design

AF Anaerobic Filter

CS CSTR

No Recovery

wastewater as a renewable resource

elucidating sustainability trade-offs

tailoring innovation

economics engineering environment

Today I’ll focus on QSD and the development of an anaerobic technology.

In conclusion, leveraging quantitative sustainable design can enable strategic technology innovation.

42

[HRSD]'

Chesapeake(Elizabeth/WWTP/

- identify needs- identify technology alternatives- navigate trade-offs- identify opportunities for innovation Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

REACTOR TYPE A

MEMBRANE TYPE C

MEMBRANE MATERIAL D

CONFIGURATION B

Flat Sheet Hollow Fiber

PHYSICAL CLEANING E

AeF or GAC?

GAC dose

GAC

Submerged

Cross-flow

Aerobic Filter

AeF

N

Start

Specific Gas Demand

Sparging Frequency

Multi-tube

C S

Cross-flow Velocity

SOLUBLE METHANE MANAGEMENT F

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

CSTR

Anaerobic Filter

S

C

AF

AF

With GAC?

N

Y

Degassing Membrane

C

S

Cross-flow

Submerged

Invalid Design

AF Anaerobic Filter

CS CSTR

No Recovery

top related