studies and research committee 1:45 – 2:45 march 16, 2012 center b4-w

K-5/6 Reading Practices Inventory for Selected Illinois School Districts:

Preliminary Results, Research Insights, and Audience Discussion

Studies and Research Committee1:45 – 2:45 March 16, 2012

Center B4-W Katie Ludes Boomer CrottyPamela Godt Karen Walker

Elizabeth Goldsmith-Conley

Special Acknowledgment

Data analysis, charts, and graphs done by

George FeroSchool of Education

McKendree Universitygjfero@mckendree.edu

Handouts

• Directions for getting to Wiki page to view results

• Request to participate form• Evaluation form

Agenda

• Introductions• Goals• Survey Questions• Preliminary Results• Research Insights• Wiki Page• Audience Suggestions• Evaluation

Goals• Compile a statewide inventory of reading programs • Make the results available to school districts and the

public. • Help districts in researching programs• Help districts in planning staff development• Help colleges of education in preparing pre-service

teachers for what they will meet in their schools• Help educational researchers• Help professional staff developers, among others. • Additional comments from audience

ChampaignFisherHeritageLudlowMahomet-SeymourMonticelloRantoulSt. JosephThomasboroTolonoUrbana

ArcolaVilla Grove

Sullivan

Blue Ridge

Galesburg

East Richland

GMS (GibsonCity Melvin Sibley)PBL (Paxton Buckley Loda)

Neoga

Shiloh

Zion

Grundy

Kendall

Cook

Lee

Livingston

Hancock

Vermillion

www.mapwSearch

Participating Districts 2011and 2012

Arcola CUSD #306 Blue Ridge CUSD #18 Champaign CUSD #4East Richland CUSD #1Fisher CUSD #1Galesburg CUSD #205Gibson City-Melvin-Sibley

CUSD #5Heritage CUSD #8

Ludlow CUSD #142Mahomet-Seymour CUSD #3Confidential #1Monticello CUSD #25 Neoga CUSD #3Paxton Buckley Loda CUD #2 Rantoul City SD #137St. Joseph Community CCSD #130

Shiloh CUSD #1Sullivan CUSD #300Thomasboro CCSD #130Tolono CUSD #7Urbana SD # 116Villa Grove CUSD #302Zion School ESD #6Coal City Unit District 1Gifford CCSD 188

Oak Park District 97Prairieview OgdenNewark Community CCD#6Steger School District 194Lansing SD 158Georgetown-Ridge Farm CUD4 Tri-Point CUSD 6Dixon USD 170Homewood

• 2 Asst. Superintendents• 4 Cur. Coordinators• 2 Curriculum Directors• 1 Learning Specialist• 7 Principals• 2 Superintendents• 6 Reading Specialists

• 1 Retired Teacher• 1 Social Worker• 2 Spec. Ed Prog Directors• 1 Special Ed Teacher• 1 Title I Aide• 1 Title I Teacher• 3 Teachers

People Who Filled Out the Survey

2011 and Illinois Comparison

80%

8%

7%1%0%3%

Ethnicity – 2011

CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian/Pacific IslanderNative AmericanMulti racial/ethnic

51.418.3

234.2

0.3 2.8

Ethnicity - State

CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian/Pacific Is-landerNative AmericanMulti racial/ethnic

2012 and Illinois Comparison

70%20%

6%1%0%4%

Ethnicity - 2012

CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian/Pacific Is-landerNative AmericanMulti racial/ethnic

51%18%

23%4%

0% 3%

Ethnicity - State

CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian/Pacific Is-landerNative AmericanMulti racial/ethnic

Total and Illinois Comparison

76%13%

7%1% 0% 4%

Ethnicity - 2011-12

CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian/Pacific Is-landerNative AmericanMulti racial/ethnic

51%18%

23%4%

0% 3%

Ethnicity - State

CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian/Pacific Is-landerNative AmericanMulti racial/ethnic

Demographics for Both Years

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

20112012CombinedIllinois

Assessments Used2011 and 2012

• AIMS/CBM• CORE• DIBELS• DRA• DRP• Gates Mac Ginitie • Gray Oral Reading• ISEl • PRO-ED• QRI• Running Records• TPRI• Woodcock Johnson• Woodcock Reading Mastery

AIMS/CBM

DRA

CORE

CTOPP

DIBELS

DRA

DRP

Gates/ MacGinitie

Gray Oral Reading

ISEL

PRO-ED

QRI

Running Records

SORT-R

SRI

TASA

TPRI

Woodcock Reading Mastery

Woodcock-Johnson III

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

OtherOutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

Assessments2011

23 districts

2012 Assessments (11 districts)

AIMS/CBM

DRA

CORE

DIBELS

DRA

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

OutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

2012 Assessments (11 districts)

DRP

Gates/ MacGinitie

Gray Oral Reading

ISEL

-10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

OutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

2012 Assessments

PRO-ED

QRI

Running Records

SORT-R

SRI

STAR

-10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

OutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

2012 Assessments 11 districts

TASA

TPRI

Woodcock Reading Mastery

Woodcock-Johnson III

-10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

OutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

Combined Assessments (34 districts)2011 and 2012

AIMS/CBM

DRA

CORE

CTOPP

DIBELS (Dynam. Indic. Basic Early Literacy Skills)

OtherOutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

Combined Assessments of 34 districts2011 and 2012

DRP

Gates/ MacGinitie

Gray Oral Reading

ISEL

PRO-ED

QRI

-10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

OtherOutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

Combined Assessments of 34 districts2011 and 2012

Running Records

SORT-R

SRI

TASA

-10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

OtherOutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreeining

Combined Assessments2011-2012

TPRI

Woodcock Reading Mastery

Woodcock-Johnson III

-10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

OtherOutcomeProgress MonitoringDiagnosticScreening

Observations about Assessments

• AIMS Web overtaking DIBELS

Core Programs Used in 34 Districts2011 and 2012

• Anywhere Learning System• Autoskill • Land of the Letter People• Let’s Read with the Letter People• McMillan/McGraw Hill• Open Court SRA/McGraw Hill• Read Well/Sopris West• Reading Mastery Plus • Rigby Literacy• Scott Foresman • Success for All• The Nation’s Choice• Trophies• Wright Group

District Use of Core Programs 2011 and 2012

Academy of Reading (American Education Corporation)

Anywhere Learning System

AutoSkill

Breakthrough to Literacy (Wright Group)

Just Listen (Abrams and Company)

Land of the Letter People (Abrams and Company)

Let’s Listen (Abrams and Company)

0 2 4 6 8

Count

Count

District Use of Core Programs2011 and 2012

Let’s Read with the Letter People (Abrams and Company)

Lives of the Letter People (Abrams and Company)

MacMillan/McGraw Hill Reading

Metro Reading (Metro TLC)

Open Court SRA/McGraw Hill

Read to Me (Abrams and Company)

Read Well 1 (Sopris West)

Read Well K Sopris West

Reading Explorers Pathfinders (Benchmark Education Company)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Count

Count

District Use of Core Programs 2011 and 2012

Reading Mastery Plus (SRA/McGrawHill)

Rigby Literacy (Rigby)

Scott-Foresman Reading

Success for All

The Nation’s Choice (Houghton Mifflin)

Trophies (Harcourt )

Wright Group Literacy

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Count

Count

Observations about programs used as core

4 programs used most frequently as core• McMillan/McGraw Hill, • Scott Foresman, • Rigby, • Trophies

Is there a problem here?

Interventions2011-2012

• Adding Additional Time• Bringing Words to Life• Earobic • Great Leaps• Jolly Phonics• Lexia • Michael Heggerty’s Phonemic

Awareness• Paths to Achieving Literacy

Success• Peer Assisted Learning Strategies

(PALS)• Quick Reads

• Read 180• Read Naturally• Reading A to Z• Reading Mastery• Reading Recovery • Road to the Code• Six Minute Solution• SLANT system• Soliloquy Software • Spire/Orton Gillingham • Wilson

Interventions by Grade Level2011 and 2012

Adding additional time of effective instruction

Bringing Words to Life

Earobics

Great Leaps

Jolly Phonics

Lexia Software

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Grade 6Grade 5Grade 4Grade 3Grade 2Grade 1Kindergarten

Interventions by Grade Level2011 and 2012

Michael Heggerty Phonemic Awareness

Paths to Achieving Literacy Success (PALS)

Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS)

QuickReads

Read 180

Read Naturally

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Grade 6Grade 5Grade 4Grade 3Grade 2Grade 1Kindergarten

Interventions by Grade Level2010-2011

Reading A-Z

Reading Mastery

Reading Recovery

Road to the Code

Six (6) Minute Solution

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Grade 6Grade 5Grade 4Grade 3Grade 2Grade 1Kindergarten

Intervention by Grade Level2011-2012

SLANT System

Solioquy Software

S.P.I.R.E. - Orton-Gillingham

SRA/Corrective Reading

Wilson Reading System & Fundamentals

Grade 6Grade 5Grade 4Grade 3Grade 2Grade 1Kindergarten

Interventions by Group2011-2012

Adding additional time of effective instruction

Bringing Words to Life

Earobics

Great Leaps

Jolly Phonics

Lexia Software

0%20%

40%60%

80%100%

IndividualSmall GroupWhole Group

Interventions by Group2011-2012

Michael Heggerty Phonemic Awareness

Paths to Achieving Literacy Success (PALS)

Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS)

QuickReads

Read Naturally

Reading A-Z

Reading Mastery

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

IndividualSmall GroupWhole Group

Interventions by Group2011-2012

Reading Recovery

Road to the Code

Six (6) Minute Solution

Solioquy Software

SRA/Corrective Reading

Wilson Reading System & Fundamentals

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%

60%70%

80%90%

100%

IndividualSmall GroupWhole Group

Observations about Interventions

• Most freqently used interventions were • M. Heggerty• Reading A-Z• 6 minute solutions, • Earobics, • Lexia • Adding more timeDoes Reading A-Z belong in this category?

Research Insights/Comments by Committee

• To make any statistically significant correlations we need a sample of at least 100 districts.

• Change in demographics from year 1 to 2• AIMS web overtaking DIBELS• We saw 4 core programs – McMillan/McGraw Hill, Scott

Foresman, Rigby, and Trophies – used most frequently• Most freqently used interventions were M. Heggerty,

Reading A-Z, 6 minute solutions, Earobics, Lexia, Adding more time

• Need to add question about satisfaction.

Observations, Questions, and Suggestons by Audience

Getting to Wiki Page

Click here

More to Do…

• Expand demographic range of districts• Explore correlations between interventions

and student achievement (Any gains?)• Rate satisfaction with assessment usage -• Identify researched based interventions • Find ways to make updated information

available• Elicit and incorporate audience suggestions

Workshop Evaluation

• What was most helpful?• What would have made this more helpful?• Should this survey be continued?• If yes, what suggestions do you have to

change it or increase participation?