state of the campus address

State of the Campus Address

State of the Campus Address

State of the Campus Address

State of the Campus Address

Roosevelt Elementary

A TEA Exemplary School

Campus: Roosevelt Teacher: C. Ramirez

D. Carmona Grade Level: PK 3/4# of

studentsLetters Vocabulary Phonological Awareness

Composite

Satisfactory15+

Emerging 4 yrs

0-3

Emerging 3 yrs 4-14

Satisfactory20+

Emerging 4 yrs 0-7

Emerging 3 yrs 8-19

Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs

Emerging 3 yrs

B.O.Y 37 9 23 5 19 17 1 34 3 0

M.O.Y 43 21 16 6 20 21 2 41 1 1

E.O.Y 45 37 6 2 28 16 1 44 0 1

# ofstudents

Letras Vocabulario Composito Conocimiento Fonológico

Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs

Emerging 3 yrs

Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs

Emerging 3 yrs

Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs

Emerging 3 yrs

B.O.Y 6 0 5 1 0 5 1 5 1 0

M.O.Y 7 1 4 2 2 4 1 6 0 1

E.O.Y 6 4 1 1 1 5 0 6 0 0

Kinder EOY Data TPRI

2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007

T1 Rhyming 100% 100% 93% 91%

T2 Blend Word Parts 100% 99% 92% 84%

T3 Blend Phonemes 100% 97% 84% 75%

T4 Del. Initial Sound 65% 94% 79% 71%

T5 Del. Final Sound 40% 62% 52% 24%

T6 Letter Name Id 95% 97% 97% 89%

T7 Letter to Sound 95% 93% 89% 84%

Comprehension 84% 70% 59% 31%

Kinder EOY Tejas Lee

2009-2010 (17)

2008-2009 (18)

2007-2008 (15)

2006-2007 (16)

T1 Book and Print 94% 94% 100% 88%

T2 Letter Name Id 94% 94% 100% 94%

T3 Letter Sound 100% 94% 100% 88%

T4 Blend Syllables 94% 100% 100% 94%

T5 Seg. Syllables 100% 100% 100% 88%

T6 Delete Initial Sound

100% 100% 87% 88%

T7 Word Reading 88% 39% 20% 41%

Comprehension 76% 17% 60% 47%

Kinder 2009-2010

EOY Tejas Lee/TPRI (clean using snapshot date)

  Mastered 6/8 including comp 6/8 tasks only

Alaniz 13/17 76% 16/17 94%Martinez 17/21 81% 20/21 95%Royal 13/16 81% 13/16 81%Southwick 17/20 85% 18/20 90%OVERALL 60/74 81%  

First Grade EOY TPRI

Tasks 2009-2010 (85 students)

‘08/’09 (70)

‘07/’08 (84)

‘06/’07 (79)

T1 Blending Word Parts 98% 98% 100% 99%

T2 Blending Phonemes 95% 98% 99% 96%

T3 Delete Initial Sounds 88% 83% 93% 75%

T4 Delete Final Sound 79% 75% 82% 64%

T5 Initial Consonants 99% 99% 100% 99%

T6 Final Consonants 99% 99% 100% 97%

T7 Middle Vowels 96% 98% 99% 95%

T8 Initial Blends 94% 96% 96% 90%

T9 Blends in Final Pos. 87% 91% 90% 86%

First Grade EOY Tejas Lee

Tasks 2009-2010 (20)

2008- 2009 (21)

2007- 2008 (20)

2006- 2007 (17)

Story 2009-2010

2008-2009

2007-2008

2006-2007

T1 100% 95% 90% 88% Listen 10% 0% 20% 6%

T2 95% 100% 90% 100% 1 0 10% 0% 0%

T3 100% 76% 75% 82% 2 0 14% 10% 6%

T4 90% 67% 55% 82% 3 0 5% 0% 12%

T5 90% 95% 100% 100% 4 10% 33% 25% 35%

T6 95% 90% 80% 100% 5 80% 38% 45% 41%

T7 95% 86% 70% 88% Fluency 67% 19% 20% 35%

T8 95% 81% 60% 82% Comp. 83% 62% 55% 70%

T9 90% 90% - -

1st Grade 2009-2010

EOY TPRI/TejasLee data (clean using snapshot date)

  S5 S4 S3 S2 S1Listening Comp

Fluency 45+

Alwood 17/22 0 0 2/22 2/22 1/22 15/17 14/17Camarillo 20/22 0 0 2/22 0 0 18/20 12/20

Medina 14/20 2/20 0 1/20 3/20 0 13/16 8/14

Molina 18/21 0 1/21 0 1/21 1/21 18/18 10/18

  C5 C4            

Driver 16/20 2/20       2/20 16/20 12/20

Overall 85/105 4/105 1/105 5/105 6/105 4/105 80/107 56/105

  81% 4% 1% 5% 6% 4% 75% 53%

2nd Grade 2009-2010

EOY TPRI/TejasLee data (clean using snapshot date)

  S5 S4 S3 S2 S1Below Grade Comp

Fluency 75+

Arespe 15/20 5/20 0 0 0 0 17/20 7/20Barbosa10/20 9/20 1 0 0 0 9/19 11/19Ruiz 16/20 4/20 0 0 0 0 20/20 16/20                   C11              Mendez 18/19 1/19 0 0 0 0 11/19 10/19                 Overall 59/79 19/79 1/79 0 0 0 57/78 44/78  75% 24% 1% 0 0 0 73% 56%

Second Grade EOY TPRI

2009-2010 (59)

2008-2009 (77)

2007-2008 (67)

2006-2007 (64)

Spelling 61% 64% 73% 67%

Listening 0 0 0 0

Grade 1 0 1% 4% 5%

Grade 2 Story 1 0 0 3% 1%

Story 2 0 0 1% 3%

Story 3 1% 4% 4% 3%

Story 4 29% 27% 19% 36%

Story 5 69% 68%

67% 51%

Fluency 67% 58% 6% 22%

Comprehension 80% 78% 40% 30%

Second Grade EOY Tejas Lee

2009-2010 (19)

2008-2009 (12)

2007-2008 (16)

2006-2007 (21)

Spelling 74% 50% 50% 28%

Listening 0 0 0 0

Grade 1 0 0 0 0

Grade 2 Story 6 0 0 0 0

Story 7 0 0 0 0

Story 8 0 0 0 0

Story 9 0 0 0 0

Story 10 5% 0 6% 5%

Story 11 95% 100% 94% 95%

Fluency 53% 75% 37% 19%

Comprehension 58% 92% 87% 86%

MClass Math 2009-20102nd Grade

Missing #

Qty Discrimination

# Facts

Computation Concepts Overall

BOY 6/86 5/86 4/86 14/86 7/86 3/86

7% 6% 5% 16% 8% 3%

EOY 14/86 22/86 29/86

1/86 24/86 8/86

16% 26% 33% 1% 29% 9%

MClass Math 2009-20101st Grade

Counting # Ident. Next # Missing Number

Qty Discrimin-

ation

# Facts Overall

BOY 25/118 16/118 25/118 15/118 18/118 19/118 17/118

21% 14% 21% 13% 15% 16% 14%

EOY 0/118 7/118 14/118 36/118 16/118 32/118 14/118

0% 6% 12% 31% 14% 27% 12%

MClass Math 2009-2010Kinder

Counting # Identification Missing # Quantity Discrimination

Overall

BOY 15/93 12/93 17/93 10/93 16/93

16% 13% 18% 11% 17%

EOY 36/93 29/93 45/93 31/93 41/93

39% 31% 48% 33% 44%

TAKS

Reading Math Writing Science

2006 82 72 93 65

2007 85 83 83 74

2008 87 83 90 63

2009 91 88 95 83

2010 92 91 96 90

2010* 88 85 88 88

* without TPM

Third Grade TAKSReading Math

Castillo 18/19=95% 18/19=95%

Cordova 11/14=79% 10/14=71%

Gomez 18/18=100% 17/18=94%

Hays 16/18=89% 16/18=89%

Sanchez 16/18=89% 14/18=78%

2006 70/73=96% 47/74=64%

2007 71/78=91% 64/78=82%

2008 64/71=90% 58/71=82%

2009 75/81=93% 66/79=84%

2010 79/87=91% 75/87=86%

Third Grade Math by Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 83 80 80 79 84Objective 2 81 77 80 86 79Objective 3 85 84 86 90 82Objective 4 81 79 84 79 82Objective 5 87 83 84 88 83Objective 6 67 65 69 65 73

Third Grade Reading by Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 85 82 82 75 86Objective 2 88 84 86 76 84Objective 3 85 79 85 81 78Objective 4 86 75 80 82 83

Fourth Grade TAKSReading Math Writing

Borrego 16/19=84% 17/20=85% 16/18=89%Casias 17/19=89% 14/20=70% 17/19=89%

Morales 16/21=76% 17/21=81% 18/21=86%N’Diaye 16/19=84% 14/19=74% 17/19=89%

2006 45/60=75% 49/60=82% 53/57=93%2007 50/67=75% 57/71=80% 54/65=83%

2008 66/78=85% 64/78=82% 69/77=90%

2009 58/63=92% 58/62=94% 58/61=95%

2010 65/78=83% 62/80=78% 68/77=88%

Fourth Grade Reading by Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 83 81 85 89 77Objective 2 78 77 82 84 82Objective 3 77 74 80 79 84Objective 4 75 73 73 85 75

Fourth Grade Math by Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 85 82 85 91 82Objective 2 85 84 82 86 81Objective 3 82 84 83 82 73Objective 4 77 84 80 86 76Objective 5 81 69 79 88 80Objective 6 75 72 68 80 69

Fourth Grade Writing by Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 3 90 91 85 92 80Objective 4 84 85 83 85 75Objective 5 89 95 85 87 86Objective 6 91 86 85 92 84

Fourth Grade Writing Compositions

Score Point 0

Score Point 1

Score Point 2

Score Point 3

Score Point 4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

03

50

400

11

50

8

01 3

51

14

206

35

11

00

7

49

8

0

20062007200820092010

Fourth Grade Writing Composition – Analysis of the

Ineffective Responses

No Atte

mpt

Focus &

Cohere

nce

Organ

izatio

n

Develo

pment o

f Idea

sVoice

Conventio

ns012345678

2006

2007

2008

2009

Fourth Grade Writing Composition – Analysis of the

Ineffective Responses by StudentStudent Focus Organization Development Voice Conventions

A XB XC X

D XE XF* X XG X X X

Fifth GradeReading Math Science

Armstrong 22/23=96% 20/23=87% 18/23=78%Cobbley 18/23=78% 21/23=91% 19/22=86%Perez 25/27=89% 26/27=96% 26/27=88%2006 40/55=73% 43/60=72% 33/54=65%2007 48/55=87% 46/55=84% 40/54=74%2008 58/68=85% 57/69=83% 42/68=62%2009 80/90=89% 74/85=87% 74/89=83%2010 65/73=89% 67/73=92% 63/72=88%

Fifth Grade Readingby Objective

First Administration Only

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 78 78 75 75 85Objective 2 81 86 78 77 84Objective 3 81 79 75 83 83Objective 4 78 71 73 71 80

Fifth Grade Mathby Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 82 82 72 80 77Objective 2 80 80 66 76 74Objective 3 83 89 82 83 83Objective 4 79 77 70 74 78Objective 5 82 84 68 78 83Objective 6 79 83 72 75 73

Fifth Grade Scienceby Objective

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Objective 1 87 83 80 88 81Objective 2 85 85 85 88 84Objective 3 80 79 77 86 84Objective 4 69 68 67 70 79

Math Cohort DataCurrent 6th Graders

Third2008

Fourth2009

Fifth 2010

Objective 1 80 91 77

Objective 2 80 86 74

Objective 3 86 82 83

Objective 4 84 86 78

Objective 5 84 88 83

Objective 6 69 80 73

Math Cohort DataCurrent 5th Graders

Third2009

Fourth2010

Objective 1 79 82

Objective 2 86 81

Objective 3 90 73

Objective 4 79 76

Objective 5 88 80

Objective 6 65 69

Math Cohort Data

Third Fourth Fifth

2006 47/74= 64% 49/60= 82% 43/60= 72%

2007 64/78= 82% 57/71= 80% 46/55= 84%

2008 58/71= 82% 64/78= 82% 57/69= 83%

2009 66/79=84% 58/62=94% 74/85=87%

2010 75/87=86% 62/80=78% 67/73=92%

Reading Cohort DataCurrent 6th Graders

Third2008

Fourth2009

5th

2010

Objective 1 82 92 85

Objective 2 86 85 84

Objective 3 85 87 83

Objective 4 80 92 80

Reading Cohort DataCurrent 5th Graders

Third2009

Fourth2010

Objective 1 75 77

Objective 2 76 82

Objective 3 81 84

Objective 4 82 75

Reading Cohort Data

Third Fourth Fifth

2006 70/73= 96% 45/60= 75% 40/55= 73%

2007 71/78= 91% 50/67= 75% 48/55= 87%

2008 64/71= 90% 66/78= 85% 58/68= 85%

2009 75/81=93% 58/63=92% 80/90=89%2010 79/87=91% 65/78=83% 65/73=89%

Special PopulationsHispanic

(Spanish Test Takers)2009 2010

3rd Grade Reading 82% (89%) 93% (80%)

4th Grade Reading 90% (100%) 83% (83%)

5th Grade Reading 76% (25%) 83% (63%)

3rd Grade Math 84% (83%) 89% (67%)

4th Grade Math 90% 76%

5th Grade Math 76% 84%

4th Grade Writing 92% (100%) 89% (89%)

5th Grade Science 82% (83%)

5th Reading February Administration Only; 5th grade Math April Administration Only

Special PopulationsEconomically Disadvantaged

(Spanish Test Takers)2009 2010

3rd Grade Reading 82% (89%) (80%)

4th Grade Reading 90% (100%) 82% (83%)

5th Grade Reading 76% (25%) 82% (63%)

3rd Grade Math 90% (83%) (67%)

4th Grade Math 91% 75%

5th Grade Math 76% 84%

4th Grade Writing 89% (100%) 89% (89%)

5th Grade 83% 83%

5th Reading February Administration Only; 5th grade Math April Administration Only

Special PopulationsLEP

(Spanish Test Takers) 2009 2010

3rd Grade Reading 71% (89%) (80%)

4th Grade Reading 83% (100%) 83% (83%)

5th Grade Reading 72% (25%) 75% (63)

3rd Grade Math 88% (83%) (67%)

4th Grade Math 100% 75%

5th Grade Math 75% 83%

4th Grade Writing 100% (100%) 80% (89%)

5th Grade 62% 89%

5th Reading February Administration Only; 5th grade Math April Administration Only

TAKS A & TAKS M3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade

TAKS A TAKS M

TAKS A TAKS M TAKS A TAKS M

Reading 0/1=0% ½=50% 2/2=100% 0/2=0% 2/2=100%

Math 0/1=0% ¾=75% ½=50% 2/3=67%

Writing 1/1=100% 2/3=67%

Science 0/1=0% ½=50%

TAKS ALT

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade

Reading 1/1=100% 2/2=100% 5/5=100%Math 1/1=100% 2/2=100% 5/5=100%Writing 2/2=100%Science 5/5=100%

TAKS ALTGrowth

4th Grade 5th Grade

ReadingGrowth

½=50% 0/3=0%

MathGrowth

½=50% 0/3=0%

ReadingLoss

½=50% 0/3=0%

MathLoss

½=50% 0/3=0%

M1& M2

Reading Math M1 M1

4th Grade 1/1=100% 1/1=100%

5th Grade 4/4=100% 4/4=100%

Commended Performance on TAKS

Reading Math Writing Science

3rd 34/87=39% 15/87=17%

4th 17/78=22% 19/80=24% 5/77=6%

5th 20/73=27% 17/73=23% 16/72=22%

Campus 71/238=30% 51/240=21%

AYP Sub Populations

Reading Math

LEP 66/77=87% 61/71=79%

SPED 22/26=85% 21/26=81%

4th Grade Reading VSS

Reading

Teacher

2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 1 Year

and BeyondLoss

Gains Less than Year

1 Year Gain

Beyond 1 Year Gain

% % % % % % % %#

ststtl sts %

Borrego 35% 35% 24% 6% 5 17 29%Casias 25% 26% 35% 37% 10% 11% 30% 26% 7 20 35%Morales 29% 48% 36% 24% 0% 0% 36% 29% 6 21 29%N'Diaye 22% 32% 44% 16% 6% 47% 6% 5% 10 19 53%Total 25% 36% 28% 20% 23% 17% 28 77 36%

4th Grade Math VSS

Math

Teacher

2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 1 Year

and BeyondLoss

Gains Less than Year

1 Year Gain

Beyond 1 Year Gain

% % % % % % % %#

ststtl sts %

Borrego   0%   33%   33%   33% 2 3 67%

Casias 15% 5% 35% 30% 10% 35% 40% 30% 13 20 65%

Morales 0% 5% 29% 19% 29% 24% 43% 52% 16 21 76%

N'Diaye 19% 47% 19% 11% 38% 16% 13% 26% 8 19 42%

Total 12% 17%   21%   25% 32% 35% 39 63 62%

5th Grade Reading VSS

Reading

Teacher

2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 1 Year

and BeyondLoss

Gains Less than Year

1 Year Gain

Beyond 1 Year Gain

% % % % % % % %#

ststtl sts %

Armstrong 19% 20% 31% 25% 13% 10% 38% 45% 11 20 55%Cobbley 21% 25% 37% 30% 16% 25% 26% 20% 9 21 43%Perez 6% 36% 33% 29% 6% 7% 39% 29% 5 19 26%Total 15% 26% 28% 15% 34% 31% 25 60 42%

Discipline by Teacher

ALWOOD

ARESPE

ARMSTR

ONG

BADILLO

BARBOSA

BORREGO

B. MORALE

S

CAMARIL

LO

CARMNA

CASIAS

CASTILL

O

CELESTI

NO

COBBLEY

CORDOVA

CRUZ

DAVILA

DELUNA

DRIVER

FLORES

GEARHART

GOMEZ

GUEVARA

HAYS

KEARNEY

MARTI

NEZ

MEDIN

A

MENDEZ

MOLI

NA

NDIAYE

REECE

RODRIGUEZ,

M

RODRIGUEZ,

T

ROYALRUIZ

SANCHEZ

SEARLES

SOUTHW

ICK

THOM

PSON

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

7.78

0.53

1.761.41

3.36

1.94

3.89

0.35

2.12

4.6

1.230.88

1.41

0.35

8.31

0.350.7

7.43

3.36

0.35

3.35

0.35

1.59

6.19

3.53

1.411.06

3

2.472.472.3

0.35

1.41

0.17

2.3

1.59

2.83

0.88

DISCIPLINE REPORT 2009-2010

PERCENTAGE

TE

AC

HE

R

Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Prekindergarten

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Carmona 0 8% 0 0 5% 0Ramirez 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 4% 0 0 3% 0

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

S. Alaniz 10% 0 0 5% 0 10%Royal 0 5% 5% 0 4% 0Martinez 5% 0 5% 0 0 0Southwick 0 14% 5% 0 5% 5%Total 4% 5% 4%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Kindergarten

Kindergarten Retention 2006-2007

Campus 7.5-District 5.7-State 3.62007 – 2008

Campus 3.4-Diistrict 3.7-State 3.3

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Driver 9% 0 0 0 0 6%Molina 13% 0 25% 0 0 0

Medina 25% 0 13% 0 18% 0

Alwood 21% 0 0 10% 0 10%

Camarillo 13% 0 4% 23% 0 14%

Total 16.2% 0 8.4% 6.6% 3.6% 6%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010First Grade

First Grade Retention 2006-2007

Campus 16.8-District 14.2-State 6.32007 – 2008

Campus 17.8-District 12.9-State 5.9

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Arespe 0 0 17% 0 5% 10%

Mendez 0 10% 0 0 0 9%

Barbosa 0 0 13% 0 0 29%

Ruiz 0 0 0 4% 4% 0

Total 0 3% 8% 1% 2.25% 12%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Second Grade

Second Grade Retention 2006-2007

Campus 7.1-District 6.9-State 3.62007 – 2008

Campus 4.9-District 6.4-State 3.4

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Sanchez 0 0 5% 0 0 9%Gomez 5% 0 5% 0 0 14%Hays 0 0 5% NA NA NACordova 13% 0 20% 7% 0 7%Castillo 0 0 10% 0 0 5%Total 4% 0 9% 1.75% 0 8.75%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Third Grade

Third Grade Retention 2006-2007

Campus 3.1-District 4.7-State 2.82007 – 2008

Campus 4.8-District 7.6-State 2.6

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Borrego 5% 0 0 5% 0 27%Casias 0 0 14% 0 0 10%N’Diaye 5% 5% 5% 0 0 15%Morales 0 0 5% 0 0 20%Total 3% 1% 6% 1.25% 18%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Fourth Grade

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Borrego 5% 0 0 5% 0 27%

Casias 0 0 14% 0 0 10%

N’Diaye 5% 5% 5% 0 0 15%

Morales 0 0 5% 0 0 20%

Total 3% 1% 6% 1.25% 18%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Fourth Grade

Fourth Grade Retention 2006-2007

Campus 4.7-District 3.9-State 1.62007 – 2008

Campus 2.0-District 2.6-State 1.3

Teacher Name

Retention 2010

Placed 2010

Status Pending 2010

Retained 2009

Placed 2009

Status Pending 2009

Armstrong 0 0 28% 0 0 9%

Perez 0 0 10% 0 0 0

Cobbley 0 0 32% 0 0 15%

Total 0 0 23% 8%

Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending

2008-2010Fifth Grade

Fifth Grade Retention 2006-2007

Campus 7.1-District 5.2-State 2.22007 – 2008

Campus 12.6-District 6.1-State 2.0

Teacher Name

A Honor Roll A/B Honor Roll

Failing one or more

subjectsAlwood 0 29% Not AvailableMedina 0 25% Not AvailableMolina 8% 25% Not Available

9% 26% Not AvailableDriver 14% 18% Not AvailableTotal 6.2% 25%

Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis

2009-2010End of Year Average

First Grade

Teacher Name

A Honor Roll

A/B Honor Roll

Failing one or more subjects

Barbosa 0 9% 9%Arespe 0 27% 9%Mendez 5% 10% 15%

Ruiz 5% 41% 0Total 3% 22% 8%

Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis

2009-2010End of Year Average

Second Grade

Teacher Name

A Honor Roll

A/B Honor Roll

Failing one or more subjects

Cordova 0 6% 27%Hays 6% 33% 6%

Sanchez 6% 28% 6%Castillo 5% 30% 5%Gomez 5% 5% 0Total 4% 20% 9%

Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis

2009-2010End of Year Average

Third Grade

Teacher Name

A Honor Roll A/B Honor Roll

Failing one or more subjects

Morales 0 5% 5%N’Diaye 5% 15% 15%Borrego 0 5% 25%Casias 0 0 33%Total 1% 6% 20%

Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis

2009-2010End of Year Average

Fourth Grade

Teacher Name

A Honor Roll

A/B Honor Roll

Failing one or more subjects

Cobbley 0 16% 4%Perez 0 8% 3%

Armstrong 0 8% 4%Total 0 11% 11%

Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis

2009-2010End of Year Average

Fifth Grade