state of the campus address
DESCRIPTION
Roosevelt Elementary. State of the Campus Address. Roosevelt Elementary. State of the Campus Address. Roosevelt Elementary A TEA Exemplary School. Roosevelt Elementary. Roosevelt Elementary. Campus: Roosevelt Teacher: C. Ramirez D. Carmona Grade Level: PK 3/4. Roosevelt Elementary. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
State of the Campus Address
State of the Campus Address
State of the Campus Address
State of the Campus Address
Roosevelt Elementary
A TEA Exemplary School
Campus: Roosevelt Teacher: C. Ramirez
D. Carmona Grade Level: PK 3/4# of
studentsLetters Vocabulary Phonological Awareness
Composite
Satisfactory15+
Emerging 4 yrs
0-3
Emerging 3 yrs 4-14
Satisfactory20+
Emerging 4 yrs 0-7
Emerging 3 yrs 8-19
Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs
Emerging 3 yrs
B.O.Y 37 9 23 5 19 17 1 34 3 0
M.O.Y 43 21 16 6 20 21 2 41 1 1
E.O.Y 45 37 6 2 28 16 1 44 0 1
# ofstudents
Letras Vocabulario Composito Conocimiento Fonológico
Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs
Emerging 3 yrs
Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs
Emerging 3 yrs
Satisfactory Emerging 4 yrs
Emerging 3 yrs
B.O.Y 6 0 5 1 0 5 1 5 1 0
M.O.Y 7 1 4 2 2 4 1 6 0 1
E.O.Y 6 4 1 1 1 5 0 6 0 0
Kinder EOY Data TPRI
2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
T1 Rhyming 100% 100% 93% 91%
T2 Blend Word Parts 100% 99% 92% 84%
T3 Blend Phonemes 100% 97% 84% 75%
T4 Del. Initial Sound 65% 94% 79% 71%
T5 Del. Final Sound 40% 62% 52% 24%
T6 Letter Name Id 95% 97% 97% 89%
T7 Letter to Sound 95% 93% 89% 84%
Comprehension 84% 70% 59% 31%
Kinder EOY Tejas Lee
2009-2010 (17)
2008-2009 (18)
2007-2008 (15)
2006-2007 (16)
T1 Book and Print 94% 94% 100% 88%
T2 Letter Name Id 94% 94% 100% 94%
T3 Letter Sound 100% 94% 100% 88%
T4 Blend Syllables 94% 100% 100% 94%
T5 Seg. Syllables 100% 100% 100% 88%
T6 Delete Initial Sound
100% 100% 87% 88%
T7 Word Reading 88% 39% 20% 41%
Comprehension 76% 17% 60% 47%
Kinder 2009-2010
EOY Tejas Lee/TPRI (clean using snapshot date)
Mastered 6/8 including comp 6/8 tasks only
Alaniz 13/17 76% 16/17 94%Martinez 17/21 81% 20/21 95%Royal 13/16 81% 13/16 81%Southwick 17/20 85% 18/20 90%OVERALL 60/74 81%
First Grade EOY TPRI
Tasks 2009-2010 (85 students)
‘08/’09 (70)
‘07/’08 (84)
‘06/’07 (79)
T1 Blending Word Parts 98% 98% 100% 99%
T2 Blending Phonemes 95% 98% 99% 96%
T3 Delete Initial Sounds 88% 83% 93% 75%
T4 Delete Final Sound 79% 75% 82% 64%
T5 Initial Consonants 99% 99% 100% 99%
T6 Final Consonants 99% 99% 100% 97%
T7 Middle Vowels 96% 98% 99% 95%
T8 Initial Blends 94% 96% 96% 90%
T9 Blends in Final Pos. 87% 91% 90% 86%
First Grade EOY Tejas Lee
Tasks 2009-2010 (20)
2008- 2009 (21)
2007- 2008 (20)
2006- 2007 (17)
Story 2009-2010
2008-2009
2007-2008
2006-2007
T1 100% 95% 90% 88% Listen 10% 0% 20% 6%
T2 95% 100% 90% 100% 1 0 10% 0% 0%
T3 100% 76% 75% 82% 2 0 14% 10% 6%
T4 90% 67% 55% 82% 3 0 5% 0% 12%
T5 90% 95% 100% 100% 4 10% 33% 25% 35%
T6 95% 90% 80% 100% 5 80% 38% 45% 41%
T7 95% 86% 70% 88% Fluency 67% 19% 20% 35%
T8 95% 81% 60% 82% Comp. 83% 62% 55% 70%
T9 90% 90% - -
1st Grade 2009-2010
EOY TPRI/TejasLee data (clean using snapshot date)
S5 S4 S3 S2 S1Listening Comp
Fluency 45+
Alwood 17/22 0 0 2/22 2/22 1/22 15/17 14/17Camarillo 20/22 0 0 2/22 0 0 18/20 12/20
Medina 14/20 2/20 0 1/20 3/20 0 13/16 8/14
Molina 18/21 0 1/21 0 1/21 1/21 18/18 10/18
C5 C4
Driver 16/20 2/20 2/20 16/20 12/20
Overall 85/105 4/105 1/105 5/105 6/105 4/105 80/107 56/105
81% 4% 1% 5% 6% 4% 75% 53%
2nd Grade 2009-2010
EOY TPRI/TejasLee data (clean using snapshot date)
S5 S4 S3 S2 S1Below Grade Comp
Fluency 75+
Arespe 15/20 5/20 0 0 0 0 17/20 7/20Barbosa10/20 9/20 1 0 0 0 9/19 11/19Ruiz 16/20 4/20 0 0 0 0 20/20 16/20 C11 Mendez 18/19 1/19 0 0 0 0 11/19 10/19 Overall 59/79 19/79 1/79 0 0 0 57/78 44/78 75% 24% 1% 0 0 0 73% 56%
Second Grade EOY TPRI
2009-2010 (59)
2008-2009 (77)
2007-2008 (67)
2006-2007 (64)
Spelling 61% 64% 73% 67%
Listening 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 0 1% 4% 5%
Grade 2 Story 1 0 0 3% 1%
Story 2 0 0 1% 3%
Story 3 1% 4% 4% 3%
Story 4 29% 27% 19% 36%
Story 5 69% 68%
67% 51%
Fluency 67% 58% 6% 22%
Comprehension 80% 78% 40% 30%
Second Grade EOY Tejas Lee
2009-2010 (19)
2008-2009 (12)
2007-2008 (16)
2006-2007 (21)
Spelling 74% 50% 50% 28%
Listening 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 0 0 0 0
Grade 2 Story 6 0 0 0 0
Story 7 0 0 0 0
Story 8 0 0 0 0
Story 9 0 0 0 0
Story 10 5% 0 6% 5%
Story 11 95% 100% 94% 95%
Fluency 53% 75% 37% 19%
Comprehension 58% 92% 87% 86%
MClass Math 2009-20102nd Grade
Missing #
Qty Discrimination
# Facts
Computation Concepts Overall
BOY 6/86 5/86 4/86 14/86 7/86 3/86
7% 6% 5% 16% 8% 3%
EOY 14/86 22/86 29/86
1/86 24/86 8/86
16% 26% 33% 1% 29% 9%
MClass Math 2009-20101st Grade
Counting # Ident. Next # Missing Number
Qty Discrimin-
ation
# Facts Overall
BOY 25/118 16/118 25/118 15/118 18/118 19/118 17/118
21% 14% 21% 13% 15% 16% 14%
EOY 0/118 7/118 14/118 36/118 16/118 32/118 14/118
0% 6% 12% 31% 14% 27% 12%
MClass Math 2009-2010Kinder
Counting # Identification Missing # Quantity Discrimination
Overall
BOY 15/93 12/93 17/93 10/93 16/93
16% 13% 18% 11% 17%
EOY 36/93 29/93 45/93 31/93 41/93
39% 31% 48% 33% 44%
TAKS
Reading Math Writing Science
2006 82 72 93 65
2007 85 83 83 74
2008 87 83 90 63
2009 91 88 95 83
2010 92 91 96 90
2010* 88 85 88 88
* without TPM
Third Grade TAKSReading Math
Castillo 18/19=95% 18/19=95%
Cordova 11/14=79% 10/14=71%
Gomez 18/18=100% 17/18=94%
Hays 16/18=89% 16/18=89%
Sanchez 16/18=89% 14/18=78%
2006 70/73=96% 47/74=64%
2007 71/78=91% 64/78=82%
2008 64/71=90% 58/71=82%
2009 75/81=93% 66/79=84%
2010 79/87=91% 75/87=86%
Third Grade Math by Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 83 80 80 79 84Objective 2 81 77 80 86 79Objective 3 85 84 86 90 82Objective 4 81 79 84 79 82Objective 5 87 83 84 88 83Objective 6 67 65 69 65 73
Third Grade Reading by Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 85 82 82 75 86Objective 2 88 84 86 76 84Objective 3 85 79 85 81 78Objective 4 86 75 80 82 83
Fourth Grade TAKSReading Math Writing
Borrego 16/19=84% 17/20=85% 16/18=89%Casias 17/19=89% 14/20=70% 17/19=89%
Morales 16/21=76% 17/21=81% 18/21=86%N’Diaye 16/19=84% 14/19=74% 17/19=89%
2006 45/60=75% 49/60=82% 53/57=93%2007 50/67=75% 57/71=80% 54/65=83%
2008 66/78=85% 64/78=82% 69/77=90%
2009 58/63=92% 58/62=94% 58/61=95%
2010 65/78=83% 62/80=78% 68/77=88%
Fourth Grade Reading by Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 83 81 85 89 77Objective 2 78 77 82 84 82Objective 3 77 74 80 79 84Objective 4 75 73 73 85 75
Fourth Grade Math by Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 85 82 85 91 82Objective 2 85 84 82 86 81Objective 3 82 84 83 82 73Objective 4 77 84 80 86 76Objective 5 81 69 79 88 80Objective 6 75 72 68 80 69
Fourth Grade Writing by Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 3 90 91 85 92 80Objective 4 84 85 83 85 75Objective 5 89 95 85 87 86Objective 6 91 86 85 92 84
Fourth Grade Writing Compositions
Score Point 0
Score Point 1
Score Point 2
Score Point 3
Score Point 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
03
50
400
11
50
8
01 3
51
14
206
35
11
00
7
49
8
0
20062007200820092010
Fourth Grade Writing Composition – Analysis of the
Ineffective Responses
No Atte
mpt
Focus &
Cohere
nce
Organ
izatio
n
Develo
pment o
f Idea
sVoice
Conventio
ns012345678
2006
2007
2008
2009
Fourth Grade Writing Composition – Analysis of the
Ineffective Responses by StudentStudent Focus Organization Development Voice Conventions
A XB XC X
D XE XF* X XG X X X
Fifth GradeReading Math Science
Armstrong 22/23=96% 20/23=87% 18/23=78%Cobbley 18/23=78% 21/23=91% 19/22=86%Perez 25/27=89% 26/27=96% 26/27=88%2006 40/55=73% 43/60=72% 33/54=65%2007 48/55=87% 46/55=84% 40/54=74%2008 58/68=85% 57/69=83% 42/68=62%2009 80/90=89% 74/85=87% 74/89=83%2010 65/73=89% 67/73=92% 63/72=88%
Fifth Grade Readingby Objective
First Administration Only
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 78 78 75 75 85Objective 2 81 86 78 77 84Objective 3 81 79 75 83 83Objective 4 78 71 73 71 80
Fifth Grade Mathby Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 82 82 72 80 77Objective 2 80 80 66 76 74Objective 3 83 89 82 83 83Objective 4 79 77 70 74 78Objective 5 82 84 68 78 83Objective 6 79 83 72 75 73
Fifth Grade Scienceby Objective
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Objective 1 87 83 80 88 81Objective 2 85 85 85 88 84Objective 3 80 79 77 86 84Objective 4 69 68 67 70 79
Math Cohort DataCurrent 6th Graders
Third2008
Fourth2009
Fifth 2010
Objective 1 80 91 77
Objective 2 80 86 74
Objective 3 86 82 83
Objective 4 84 86 78
Objective 5 84 88 83
Objective 6 69 80 73
Math Cohort DataCurrent 5th Graders
Third2009
Fourth2010
Objective 1 79 82
Objective 2 86 81
Objective 3 90 73
Objective 4 79 76
Objective 5 88 80
Objective 6 65 69
Math Cohort Data
Third Fourth Fifth
2006 47/74= 64% 49/60= 82% 43/60= 72%
2007 64/78= 82% 57/71= 80% 46/55= 84%
2008 58/71= 82% 64/78= 82% 57/69= 83%
2009 66/79=84% 58/62=94% 74/85=87%
2010 75/87=86% 62/80=78% 67/73=92%
Reading Cohort DataCurrent 6th Graders
Third2008
Fourth2009
5th
2010
Objective 1 82 92 85
Objective 2 86 85 84
Objective 3 85 87 83
Objective 4 80 92 80
Reading Cohort DataCurrent 5th Graders
Third2009
Fourth2010
Objective 1 75 77
Objective 2 76 82
Objective 3 81 84
Objective 4 82 75
Reading Cohort Data
Third Fourth Fifth
2006 70/73= 96% 45/60= 75% 40/55= 73%
2007 71/78= 91% 50/67= 75% 48/55= 87%
2008 64/71= 90% 66/78= 85% 58/68= 85%
2009 75/81=93% 58/63=92% 80/90=89%2010 79/87=91% 65/78=83% 65/73=89%
Special PopulationsHispanic
(Spanish Test Takers)2009 2010
3rd Grade Reading 82% (89%) 93% (80%)
4th Grade Reading 90% (100%) 83% (83%)
5th Grade Reading 76% (25%) 83% (63%)
3rd Grade Math 84% (83%) 89% (67%)
4th Grade Math 90% 76%
5th Grade Math 76% 84%
4th Grade Writing 92% (100%) 89% (89%)
5th Grade Science 82% (83%)
5th Reading February Administration Only; 5th grade Math April Administration Only
Special PopulationsEconomically Disadvantaged
(Spanish Test Takers)2009 2010
3rd Grade Reading 82% (89%) (80%)
4th Grade Reading 90% (100%) 82% (83%)
5th Grade Reading 76% (25%) 82% (63%)
3rd Grade Math 90% (83%) (67%)
4th Grade Math 91% 75%
5th Grade Math 76% 84%
4th Grade Writing 89% (100%) 89% (89%)
5th Grade 83% 83%
5th Reading February Administration Only; 5th grade Math April Administration Only
Special PopulationsLEP
(Spanish Test Takers) 2009 2010
3rd Grade Reading 71% (89%) (80%)
4th Grade Reading 83% (100%) 83% (83%)
5th Grade Reading 72% (25%) 75% (63)
3rd Grade Math 88% (83%) (67%)
4th Grade Math 100% 75%
5th Grade Math 75% 83%
4th Grade Writing 100% (100%) 80% (89%)
5th Grade 62% 89%
5th Reading February Administration Only; 5th grade Math April Administration Only
TAKS A & TAKS M3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade
TAKS A TAKS M
TAKS A TAKS M TAKS A TAKS M
Reading 0/1=0% ½=50% 2/2=100% 0/2=0% 2/2=100%
Math 0/1=0% ¾=75% ½=50% 2/3=67%
Writing 1/1=100% 2/3=67%
Science 0/1=0% ½=50%
TAKS ALT
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade
Reading 1/1=100% 2/2=100% 5/5=100%Math 1/1=100% 2/2=100% 5/5=100%Writing 2/2=100%Science 5/5=100%
TAKS ALTGrowth
4th Grade 5th Grade
ReadingGrowth
½=50% 0/3=0%
MathGrowth
½=50% 0/3=0%
ReadingLoss
½=50% 0/3=0%
MathLoss
½=50% 0/3=0%
M1& M2
Reading Math M1 M1
4th Grade 1/1=100% 1/1=100%
5th Grade 4/4=100% 4/4=100%
Commended Performance on TAKS
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd 34/87=39% 15/87=17%
4th 17/78=22% 19/80=24% 5/77=6%
5th 20/73=27% 17/73=23% 16/72=22%
Campus 71/238=30% 51/240=21%
AYP Sub Populations
Reading Math
LEP 66/77=87% 61/71=79%
SPED 22/26=85% 21/26=81%
4th Grade Reading VSS
Reading
Teacher
2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 1 Year
and BeyondLoss
Gains Less than Year
1 Year Gain
Beyond 1 Year Gain
% % % % % % % %#
ststtl sts %
Borrego 35% 35% 24% 6% 5 17 29%Casias 25% 26% 35% 37% 10% 11% 30% 26% 7 20 35%Morales 29% 48% 36% 24% 0% 0% 36% 29% 6 21 29%N'Diaye 22% 32% 44% 16% 6% 47% 6% 5% 10 19 53%Total 25% 36% 28% 20% 23% 17% 28 77 36%
4th Grade Math VSS
Math
Teacher
2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 1 Year
and BeyondLoss
Gains Less than Year
1 Year Gain
Beyond 1 Year Gain
% % % % % % % %#
ststtl sts %
Borrego 0% 33% 33% 33% 2 3 67%
Casias 15% 5% 35% 30% 10% 35% 40% 30% 13 20 65%
Morales 0% 5% 29% 19% 29% 24% 43% 52% 16 21 76%
N'Diaye 19% 47% 19% 11% 38% 16% 13% 26% 8 19 42%
Total 12% 17% 21% 25% 32% 35% 39 63 62%
5th Grade Reading VSS
Reading
Teacher
2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2010 1 Year
and BeyondLoss
Gains Less than Year
1 Year Gain
Beyond 1 Year Gain
% % % % % % % %#
ststtl sts %
Armstrong 19% 20% 31% 25% 13% 10% 38% 45% 11 20 55%Cobbley 21% 25% 37% 30% 16% 25% 26% 20% 9 21 43%Perez 6% 36% 33% 29% 6% 7% 39% 29% 5 19 26%Total 15% 26% 28% 15% 34% 31% 25 60 42%
Discipline by Teacher
ALWOOD
ARESPE
ARMSTR
ONG
BADILLO
BARBOSA
BORREGO
B. MORALE
S
CAMARIL
LO
CARMNA
CASIAS
CASTILL
O
CELESTI
NO
COBBLEY
CORDOVA
CRUZ
DAVILA
DELUNA
DRIVER
FLORES
GEARHART
GOMEZ
GUEVARA
HAYS
KEARNEY
MARTI
NEZ
MEDIN
A
MENDEZ
MOLI
NA
NDIAYE
REECE
RODRIGUEZ,
M
RODRIGUEZ,
T
ROYALRUIZ
SANCHEZ
SEARLES
SOUTHW
ICK
THOM
PSON
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
7.78
0.53
1.761.41
3.36
1.94
3.89
0.35
2.12
4.6
1.230.88
1.41
0.35
8.31
0.350.7
7.43
3.36
0.35
3.35
0.35
1.59
6.19
3.53
1.411.06
3
2.472.472.3
0.35
1.41
0.17
2.3
1.59
2.83
0.88
DISCIPLINE REPORT 2009-2010
PERCENTAGE
TE
AC
HE
R
Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Prekindergarten
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Carmona 0 8% 0 0 5% 0Ramirez 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 4% 0 0 3% 0
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
S. Alaniz 10% 0 0 5% 0 10%Royal 0 5% 5% 0 4% 0Martinez 5% 0 5% 0 0 0Southwick 0 14% 5% 0 5% 5%Total 4% 5% 4%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Kindergarten
Kindergarten Retention 2006-2007
Campus 7.5-District 5.7-State 3.62007 – 2008
Campus 3.4-Diistrict 3.7-State 3.3
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Driver 9% 0 0 0 0 6%Molina 13% 0 25% 0 0 0
Medina 25% 0 13% 0 18% 0
Alwood 21% 0 0 10% 0 10%
Camarillo 13% 0 4% 23% 0 14%
Total 16.2% 0 8.4% 6.6% 3.6% 6%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010First Grade
First Grade Retention 2006-2007
Campus 16.8-District 14.2-State 6.32007 – 2008
Campus 17.8-District 12.9-State 5.9
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Arespe 0 0 17% 0 5% 10%
Mendez 0 10% 0 0 0 9%
Barbosa 0 0 13% 0 0 29%
Ruiz 0 0 0 4% 4% 0
Total 0 3% 8% 1% 2.25% 12%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Second Grade
Second Grade Retention 2006-2007
Campus 7.1-District 6.9-State 3.62007 – 2008
Campus 4.9-District 6.4-State 3.4
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Sanchez 0 0 5% 0 0 9%Gomez 5% 0 5% 0 0 14%Hays 0 0 5% NA NA NACordova 13% 0 20% 7% 0 7%Castillo 0 0 10% 0 0 5%Total 4% 0 9% 1.75% 0 8.75%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Third Grade
Third Grade Retention 2006-2007
Campus 3.1-District 4.7-State 2.82007 – 2008
Campus 4.8-District 7.6-State 2.6
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Borrego 5% 0 0 5% 0 27%Casias 0 0 14% 0 0 10%N’Diaye 5% 5% 5% 0 0 15%Morales 0 0 5% 0 0 20%Total 3% 1% 6% 1.25% 18%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Fourth Grade
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Borrego 5% 0 0 5% 0 27%
Casias 0 0 14% 0 0 10%
N’Diaye 5% 5% 5% 0 0 15%
Morales 0 0 5% 0 0 20%
Total 3% 1% 6% 1.25% 18%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Fourth Grade
Fourth Grade Retention 2006-2007
Campus 4.7-District 3.9-State 1.62007 – 2008
Campus 2.0-District 2.6-State 1.3
Teacher Name
Retention 2010
Placed 2010
Status Pending 2010
Retained 2009
Placed 2009
Status Pending 2009
Armstrong 0 0 28% 0 0 9%
Perez 0 0 10% 0 0 0
Cobbley 0 0 32% 0 0 15%
Total 0 0 23% 8%
Roosevelt Elementary Two Year Analysis Retention/Placement/Status Pending
2008-2010Fifth Grade
Fifth Grade Retention 2006-2007
Campus 7.1-District 5.2-State 2.22007 – 2008
Campus 12.6-District 6.1-State 2.0
Teacher Name
A Honor Roll A/B Honor Roll
Failing one or more
subjectsAlwood 0 29% Not AvailableMedina 0 25% Not AvailableMolina 8% 25% Not Available
9% 26% Not AvailableDriver 14% 18% Not AvailableTotal 6.2% 25%
Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis
2009-2010End of Year Average
First Grade
Teacher Name
A Honor Roll
A/B Honor Roll
Failing one or more subjects
Barbosa 0 9% 9%Arespe 0 27% 9%Mendez 5% 10% 15%
Ruiz 5% 41% 0Total 3% 22% 8%
Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis
2009-2010End of Year Average
Second Grade
Teacher Name
A Honor Roll
A/B Honor Roll
Failing one or more subjects
Cordova 0 6% 27%Hays 6% 33% 6%
Sanchez 6% 28% 6%Castillo 5% 30% 5%Gomez 5% 5% 0Total 4% 20% 9%
Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis
2009-2010End of Year Average
Third Grade
Teacher Name
A Honor Roll A/B Honor Roll
Failing one or more subjects
Morales 0 5% 5%N’Diaye 5% 15% 15%Borrego 0 5% 25%Casias 0 0 33%Total 1% 6% 20%
Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis
2009-2010End of Year Average
Fourth Grade
Teacher Name
A Honor Roll
A/B Honor Roll
Failing one or more subjects
Cobbley 0 16% 4%Perez 0 8% 3%
Armstrong 0 8% 4%Total 0 11% 11%
Roosevelt Elementary SchoolReport Card Analysis
2009-2010End of Year Average
Fifth Grade