spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation t and/or s topics;

Post on 15-Jan-2016

24 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes (mainly) in the Atlantic; particularly the gyre variability Inflow to t he Nordic Seas/Arctic Water mass transformation in the Nordic Seas AMOC variability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S

Topics;• Variability guided by observed changes (mainly) in the Atlantic; particularly the gyre variability• Inflow to the Nordic Seas/Arctic• Water mass transformation in the Nordic Seas• AMOC variability• Physical forcing of the marine biota• Idealised experiments; role of the ocean preconditioning and atmospheric forcing

Have used NCAR/NCEP and ERA40, error in implementation of CORE; will be rerun

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Spin-up … min full 4 cycles with daily forcing; usually 6 full cycles (ca. 300 yr)

Always start with (strong) SSS-relaxation; 30 days for 50 m thick ML; scales with ML depth; limited to |ΔSSS<0.5| everywhere; no relaxation under max sea ice extent

Diagnose SSS-nudging when model is steady (5th or 6th cycle); applying diagnosed SSS-fluxes for the production runs with very weak Newtonian relaxation (360 days time scale for 50 m ML and |ΔSSS<0.5| )

Temperature relaxation is not critical (in our system)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

AMOC, last 4 cycles

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

NA Sub-Polar Gyre SSH, last 4 cycles

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

3) Increased salinity inthe Subpolar gyre (SPG)

2) Increased salinity in thesubtropical gyre (STG)

1) Relative contributionfrom the two gyres

(Dynamics)

4) Enhanced Evaporation minus Precipitation (E-P)

Possible mechanisms causing the rapid increase in salinity (and temperature)

Hatun et al., Science (2005)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Altimetry

MICOM

SSH EOF (Häkkinen and Rhines, Science, 2004)

I

I

F

F

R

R

Dynamical SPG influence

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

RI

A longer term perspective,using the simulated Gyre Index

as a proxy for the circulation

Irminger Current (obs)

Rockall Through (obs)

Gyre index (model)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

NB: Relationship also valid for temperature

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Forcing mechanisms (I)

Hatun et al., in prep.

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen Hatun et al., in prep

Forcing mechanisms (II)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Wind stress and NAO consistent with the Gyre Index before - but not after - 1995

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

– SPG is of key importance for the decadal-scale variations in the Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Mediterranean and along the cost off South Greenland

– The strength of the SPG is governed by the Subpolar (winter) buoyancy forcing

– The latter follows, in general, the North Atlantic wind stress (NAO) forcing, but not after 1995/96

– The Subpolar Gyre Index, rather than NAO, should be used as a proxy for the variability of the marine climate in the North Atlantic region (can be deduced from observations or hind-cast model simulations)

Conclusions (1)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Recent North Atlantic Warming and Some Consequences Thereof

Helge Drange, Katja Lohmann, Mats Bentsen, Hjalmar Hatun, Anne Britt Sandø and colleagues

helge.drange@gfi.uib.no

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 °C

Orvik and Niiler, GRL, 2002

Observed sea surface temperature

Greenland

Norway

UK

Iceland

This presentation: Focus on the rapid (northern) North Atlantic warming after 1995/96

Not addressed here: The superimposed global warming signal

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 °C

Barents

Faroes

Observed hydrography, N Atl/Nordic Seas (NB: post 95-changes!)

Fram Strait

Svinøy section

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

(Hátún, AGU Monogr 158, 2005)

SST variability (Atl inflow), Faroe Islands

Record high temperature(and salinity)

Simulated temperature

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

1 °C increase in T of Atlantic Water entering the Nordic Seas since 1997

(ca 0-600 m)

Orv

ik, K

jell

Aril

d; S

kags

eth,

Øys

tein

(20

05),

Hea

t flu

x va

riatio

ns in

th

e ea

ster

n N

orw

egia

n A

tlant

ic C

urre

nt to

war

d th

e A

rctic

from

m

oore

d in

stru

men

ts, 1

995–

2005

. Geo

ph. R

es. L

ett.,

32,

No.

14,

L1

4610

10.

1029

/200

5GL0

2348

7

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Ingvaldsen, Loeng and Ådlandsvik, 2007

Temperature anomaly (ºC), 50-200 m Barents Sea

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen Ursula Schauer, AWI

Observed vertically avg temperature, Fram Strait

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Observed air temperature, Nuuk (W Greenland)

Stein (2007)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov

Jakobshavn glacier, West Greenland

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Rapid warming is observed throughout the North Atlantic since 1995/96

Followed by rapid changes in the cryosphere and the marine ecosystems, possibly/likely linked to the North Atlantic warming

North Atlantic salinity is increasing in concert with temperature (post 1995)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

The model system used

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

MICOMThe NERSC version

Simulatedsalinity

Global model:(40 km in the Nordic Seas) run forthe 1948-2003 period; forced with daily atmosphericNCAR/NCEP re-analyses fields

Nordic Seas

Regional model: (20 km in the North Atlantic) run for

the same period (1948-2003); forcing fields as for the global model;

boundary fields from the global model

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Subpolar gyresource water

Western Subtropical gyreSource water

Western North Atlantic Water (WNAW)

Eastern NorthAtlantic Water (ENAW)

Source Watersfor the Atlantic Inflows

Simulatedsalinity

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Irminger (I) Faroe (F) Rockall (R)

Observed and simulated salinity anomalies at three locations in the northern North Atlantic

Hatun et al., Science (2005)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

RIGyre index

Irminger Current (obs)

Rockall Trough (obs)

Gyre index

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Atmospheric forcing

Hatun et al., 2007

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of BergenHatun et al., 2007

Atmospheric forcing

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Q1 How does the subpolar gyre (SPG) respond to a persistent, decadal time scale positive – or negative – NAO forcing?

Q2 How linear is the response of the SPG forced with positive – or negative – phases of the NAO?

Q3 How important was the ocean initial state in 1995 for the strong and rapid weakening of the SPG?

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Q1 How does the subpolar gyre (SPG) respond to a persistent, decadal time scale positive – or negative – NAO forcing?

Q2 How linear is the response of the SPG forced with positive – or negative – phases of the NAO?

Q3 How important was the ocean initial state in 1995 for the strong and rapid weakening of the SPG?

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Idealized experiments (Lohmann et al., Clim Dyn, 2008)

40 year sensitivity experiments, forced with persistent NAO+, NAO- and NAOn fields (cycling through the marked years)

NAO indexHigh NAO-years

Low NAO-years

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sea surface height, NAO+ minus NAOn

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Steric height, NAO+ minus NAOn

T

S

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

SPG index, NAO+ minus NAOn

Strong

Weak

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sea surface height, NAO- minus NAOn

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sea surface height, NAO+ minus NAO-

Looks like a gradual (linear) change, but is a composite of two different temporal and

spatial responses

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Conclusions (2)

• NAO+ Initial strengthening of SPG After ~10 years replaced by weakening Advective warming overruns local buoyancy forcing

• NAO- Steady weakening of SPG No ocean advective feedback

• Nonlinearity: SPG response to NAO+ and NAO- forcing is nonlinear, so the difference NAO+ minus NAO- is misleading

• NAOn forcing can reveal temporal / spatial nonlinearities in ocean’s response to NAO (for analysis, use e.g. NAO+ minus NAOn and NAO- minus NAOn)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

NAO index

Q3 How important was the ocean initial state in 1995 for the strong and rapid weakening of the SPG?

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sensitivity experiments

Post 1995 forcing (red arrow) applied to ocean initial state from ✓ 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 2000, 2005, and✓ every year between 1991 and 1997

Simulated strength of the SPG

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Post 1995 forcing (I)

Control integration (“reality”)

Simulated strength of the SPG

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Control integration (“reality”)

Post 1995 forcing (II)

Simulated strength of the SPG

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Additional sensitivity experiments

Post 1982 forcing (red arrow) applied to ocean initial state from ✓ 1975, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005

Simulated strength of the SPG

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Post 1982 forcing

Control integration 1995

Simulated strength of the SPG

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Conclusions (3)

What happened after 1995? ✓ SPG close to maximum strength and approaching

weakening even with unchanged NAO+ forcing (preconditioning)

NAO forcing dropped from high to low value the winter 1995/96 (right forcing)

Important implications for decadal-scale predictability of the climate in the North Atlantic – the ocean initial state is of key imortance

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen Large increase in the blue whiting SSB

Large changes in the distribution of redfish

Changessince 1995

Cod is heading back toGreenlandic waters

Warming

Warming

Warming

Warming

Herring is heading backto Icelandic and Faroese waters

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Hatun et al, Prog. Oceanogr. (2009)

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Response of phytoplankton (PCI) and zooplankton (Cal. Fin.)

top related