department of geophysics university of bergen spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation t...

53
Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes (mainly) in the Atlantic; particularly the gyre variability Inflow to the Nordic Seas/Arctic Water mass transformation in the Nordic Seas AMOC variability Physical forcing of the marine biota Idealised experiments; role of the ocean preconditioning and atmospheric forcing Have used NCAR/NCEP and ERA40, error in implementation of CORE; will be rerun

Upload: jared-parsons

Post on 26-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S

Topics;• Variability guided by observed changes (mainly) in the Atlantic; particularly the gyre variability• Inflow to the Nordic Seas/Arctic• Water mass transformation in the Nordic Seas• AMOC variability• Physical forcing of the marine biota• Idealised experiments; role of the ocean preconditioning and atmospheric forcing

Have used NCAR/NCEP and ERA40, error in implementation of CORE; will be rerun

Page 2: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Spin-up … min full 4 cycles with daily forcing; usually 6 full cycles (ca. 300 yr)

Always start with (strong) SSS-relaxation; 30 days for 50 m thick ML; scales with ML depth; limited to |ΔSSS<0.5| everywhere; no relaxation under max sea ice extent

Diagnose SSS-nudging when model is steady (5th or 6th cycle); applying diagnosed SSS-fluxes for the production runs with very weak Newtonian relaxation (360 days time scale for 50 m ML and |ΔSSS<0.5| )

Temperature relaxation is not critical (in our system)

Page 3: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Page 4: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Page 5: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

AMOC, last 4 cycles

Page 6: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

NA Sub-Polar Gyre SSH, last 4 cycles

Page 7: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Page 8: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Page 9: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

3) Increased salinity inthe Subpolar gyre (SPG)

2) Increased salinity in thesubtropical gyre (STG)

1) Relative contributionfrom the two gyres

(Dynamics)

4) Enhanced Evaporation minus Precipitation (E-P)

Possible mechanisms causing the rapid increase in salinity (and temperature)

Hatun et al., Science (2005)

Page 10: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Altimetry

MICOM

SSH EOF (Häkkinen and Rhines, Science, 2004)

I

I

F

F

R

R

Dynamical SPG influence

Page 11: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

RI

A longer term perspective,using the simulated Gyre Index

as a proxy for the circulation

Irminger Current (obs)

Rockall Through (obs)

Gyre index (model)

Page 12: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

NB: Relationship also valid for temperature

Page 13: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Forcing mechanisms (I)

Hatun et al., in prep.

Page 14: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen Hatun et al., in prep

Forcing mechanisms (II)

Page 15: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Wind stress and NAO consistent with the Gyre Index before - but not after - 1995

Page 16: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

– SPG is of key importance for the decadal-scale variations in the Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Mediterranean and along the cost off South Greenland

– The strength of the SPG is governed by the Subpolar (winter) buoyancy forcing

– The latter follows, in general, the North Atlantic wind stress (NAO) forcing, but not after 1995/96

– The Subpolar Gyre Index, rather than NAO, should be used as a proxy for the variability of the marine climate in the North Atlantic region (can be deduced from observations or hind-cast model simulations)

Conclusions (1)

Page 17: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Recent North Atlantic Warming and Some Consequences Thereof

Helge Drange, Katja Lohmann, Mats Bentsen, Hjalmar Hatun, Anne Britt Sandø and colleagues

[email protected]

Page 18: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 °C

Orvik and Niiler, GRL, 2002

Observed sea surface temperature

Greenland

Norway

UK

Iceland

This presentation: Focus on the rapid (northern) North Atlantic warming after 1995/96

Not addressed here: The superimposed global warming signal

Page 19: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 °C

Barents

Faroes

Observed hydrography, N Atl/Nordic Seas (NB: post 95-changes!)

Fram Strait

Svinøy section

Page 20: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

(Hátún, AGU Monogr 158, 2005)

SST variability (Atl inflow), Faroe Islands

Record high temperature(and salinity)

Simulated temperature

Page 21: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

1 °C increase in T of Atlantic Water entering the Nordic Seas since 1997

(ca 0-600 m)

Orv

ik, K

jell

Aril

d; S

kags

eth,

Øys

tein

(20

05),

Hea

t flu

x va

riatio

ns in

th

e ea

ster

n N

orw

egia

n A

tlant

ic C

urre

nt to

war

d th

e A

rctic

from

m

oore

d in

stru

men

ts, 1

995–

2005

. Geo

ph. R

es. L

ett.,

32,

No.

14,

L1

4610

10.

1029

/200

5GL0

2348

7

Page 22: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Ingvaldsen, Loeng and Ådlandsvik, 2007

Temperature anomaly (ºC), 50-200 m Barents Sea

Page 23: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen Ursula Schauer, AWI

Observed vertically avg temperature, Fram Strait

Page 24: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Observed air temperature, Nuuk (W Greenland)

Stein (2007)

Page 25: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov

Jakobshavn glacier, West Greenland

Page 26: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Page 27: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Rapid warming is observed throughout the North Atlantic since 1995/96

Followed by rapid changes in the cryosphere and the marine ecosystems, possibly/likely linked to the North Atlantic warming

North Atlantic salinity is increasing in concert with temperature (post 1995)

Page 28: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

The model system used

Page 29: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

MICOMThe NERSC version

Simulatedsalinity

Global model:(40 km in the Nordic Seas) run forthe 1948-2003 period; forced with daily atmosphericNCAR/NCEP re-analyses fields

Nordic Seas

Regional model: (20 km in the North Atlantic) run for

the same period (1948-2003); forcing fields as for the global model;

boundary fields from the global model

Page 30: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Subpolar gyresource water

Western Subtropical gyreSource water

Western North Atlantic Water (WNAW)

Eastern NorthAtlantic Water (ENAW)

Source Watersfor the Atlantic Inflows

Simulatedsalinity

Page 31: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Irminger (I) Faroe (F) Rockall (R)

Observed and simulated salinity anomalies at three locations in the northern North Atlantic

Hatun et al., Science (2005)

Page 32: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

RIGyre index

Irminger Current (obs)

Rockall Trough (obs)

Gyre index

Page 33: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Atmospheric forcing

Hatun et al., 2007

Page 34: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of BergenHatun et al., 2007

Atmospheric forcing

Page 35: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Q1 How does the subpolar gyre (SPG) respond to a persistent, decadal time scale positive – or negative – NAO forcing?

Q2 How linear is the response of the SPG forced with positive – or negative – phases of the NAO?

Q3 How important was the ocean initial state in 1995 for the strong and rapid weakening of the SPG?

Page 36: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Q1 How does the subpolar gyre (SPG) respond to a persistent, decadal time scale positive – or negative – NAO forcing?

Q2 How linear is the response of the SPG forced with positive – or negative – phases of the NAO?

Q3 How important was the ocean initial state in 1995 for the strong and rapid weakening of the SPG?

Page 37: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Idealized experiments (Lohmann et al., Clim Dyn, 2008)

40 year sensitivity experiments, forced with persistent NAO+, NAO- and NAOn fields (cycling through the marked years)

NAO indexHigh NAO-years

Low NAO-years

Page 38: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sea surface height, NAO+ minus NAOn

Page 39: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Steric height, NAO+ minus NAOn

T

S

Page 40: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

SPG index, NAO+ minus NAOn

Strong

Weak

Page 41: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sea surface height, NAO- minus NAOn

Page 42: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sea surface height, NAO+ minus NAO-

Looks like a gradual (linear) change, but is a composite of two different temporal and

spatial responses

Page 43: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Conclusions (2)

• NAO+ Initial strengthening of SPG After ~10 years replaced by weakening Advective warming overruns local buoyancy forcing

• NAO- Steady weakening of SPG No ocean advective feedback

• Nonlinearity: SPG response to NAO+ and NAO- forcing is nonlinear, so the difference NAO+ minus NAO- is misleading

• NAOn forcing can reveal temporal / spatial nonlinearities in ocean’s response to NAO (for analysis, use e.g. NAO+ minus NAOn and NAO- minus NAOn)

Page 44: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

NAO index

Q3 How important was the ocean initial state in 1995 for the strong and rapid weakening of the SPG?

Page 45: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Sensitivity experiments

Post 1995 forcing (red arrow) applied to ocean initial state from ✓ 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 2000, 2005, and✓ every year between 1991 and 1997

Simulated strength of the SPG

Page 46: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Post 1995 forcing (I)

Control integration (“reality”)

Simulated strength of the SPG

Page 47: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Control integration (“reality”)

Post 1995 forcing (II)

Simulated strength of the SPG

Page 48: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Additional sensitivity experiments

Post 1982 forcing (red arrow) applied to ocean initial state from ✓ 1975, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005

Simulated strength of the SPG

Page 49: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Post 1982 forcing

Control integration 1995

Simulated strength of the SPG

Page 50: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Conclusions (3)

What happened after 1995? ✓ SPG close to maximum strength and approaching

weakening even with unchanged NAO+ forcing (preconditioning)

NAO forcing dropped from high to low value the winter 1995/96 (right forcing)

Important implications for decadal-scale predictability of the climate in the North Atlantic – the ocean initial state is of key imortance

Page 51: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen Large increase in the blue whiting SSB

Large changes in the distribution of redfish

Changessince 1995

Cod is heading back toGreenlandic waters

Warming

Warming

Warming

Warming

Herring is heading backto Icelandic and Faroese waters

Page 52: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Hatun et al, Prog. Oceanogr. (2009)

Page 53: Department of Geophysics University of Bergen Spin-up; monthly forcing; daily forcing; relaxation T and/or S Topics; Variability guided by observed changes

Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Bergen

Response of phytoplankton (PCI) and zooplankton (Cal. Fin.)