setting the context: impacts of migration between 2001-11

Post on 23-Feb-2016

41 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Setting the Context: impacts of migration between 2001-11 . What we have learned from the last decade . Antoine Paccoud LSE Geography 24-03- 2014. OUTLINE. Limitations The situation in 2011 Identifying trends: 2001 - 2011 Zooming in: South London Causes/implications. LIMITATIONS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Setting the Context: impacts of migration

between 2001-11

Antoine PaccoudLSE Geography

24-03-2014

What we have learned from the last decade

OUTLINELimitations

The situation in 2011

Identifying trends: 2001 - 2011

Zooming in: South London

Causes/implications

LIMITATIONS

Focus on Country of Birth Data for 2001 and 2011Not on date of arrivalNot on ethnicity/nationality

Focus on Greater LondonNot on extended London region

Focus on spatial patternsNot on socio-economic characteristics

London’s super-diversity in the UK context

The UK-born in the wider London region

The settlement patterns of different migrant groups

THE SITUATION IN 2011

London’s super-diversity in the UK context

The UK-born in the wider London region

The settlement patterns of different migrant groups

THE SITUATION IN 2011

London’s super-diversity in the UK context

The UK-born in the wider London region

The settlement patterns of different migrant groups

THE SITUATION IN 2011

Differentiating between ‘diversities’

A return to the centre of the UK born?

Summarising changes

IDENTIFYING TRENDS: 2001-2011

1. USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Australia, China, HK

3.6% in 2001; 5.5% in 20112. India, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Romania

5% in 2001; 7.9% in 20113. Jamaica, Nigeria, Portugal, Turkey, Somalia

3.3% in 2001; 5% in 2011

UK: 73.1% in 2001; 71.7% in 2011Poland: 0.3% in 2001; 2.2% in 2011

DIFFERENT DIVERSITIES

2001:85.4%

2011:92.3%

Type 1 2001

Type 1 2011

Type 2 2001

Type 2 2011

Type 3 2001

Type 3 2011

Differentiating between ‘diversities’

A return to the centre of the UK born?

Summarising changes

IDENTIFYING TRENDS: 2001-2011

Location Quotient 2001 – United Kingdom

UK 2001

Location Quotient 2011 – United Kingdom

UK 2011

Differentiating between ‘diversities’

A return to the centre of the UK born?

Summarising changes

IDENTIFYING TRENDS: 2001-2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

All Residents 2001

All Residents 2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

UK 2001

UK 2011

UK 2001-2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

Germany2001

Germany2011

Germany2001-2011

USA 2001

USA 2011

USA2001-2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

India 2001

India 2011

India 2001-2011

Pakistan2001

Pakistan2011

Pakistan2001-2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

Jamaica2001

Jamaica2011

Jamaica2001-2011

Nigeria2001

Nigeria2011

Nigeria2001-2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

Poland2001

Poland2011

Poland2001-2011

SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAMSummaryAll residentsUKGroup 1: Germany, USAGroup 2: India, PakistanGroup 3: Jamaica, NigeriaPoland

ZOOMING IN

Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants

Change in the spatial distribution of social renting households

Current threats to London’s diversity

CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS

Benefits 2001

Benefits 2010

Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants

Change in the spatial distribution of social renting households

Current threats to London’s diversity

CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS

Social Rented

2001

Social Rented

2011

Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants

Change in the spatial distribution of socially rented housing

Current threats to London’s diversity

CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS

Re-commodification of labourLocal Government cuts (social housing)Welfare Reforms (‘Bedroom Tax’,

housing benefits, benefit cap, etc.)

Housing marketIncreasing house prices (Help to Buy)Proposed immigration checks (racial

profiling)

CURRENT THREATS

top related