presentation sharing experiences of managing demand in transferring statements and ldas to...
Post on 18-Jan-2018
217 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
PresentationSharing experiences of managing demand
in transferring statements and LDAs to Education, Health and Care Plans
(EHCPs)
Jess Haslam, York
Transfer to EHCP in York
. Jess Haslam, Lisa Abel
An overview
• The scores of the doors• What went well• Learning• Where to go next/still to do• The process
City of York• Total population est (ONS): 204,43
January census:
• Nos on roll for all York schools: 24,485
• Children with SEN: 2,912 (11.9%)
• England ave Jan 14 (17.9%)
• Statement/EHCP currently: 533(2.1%)
• Statements in Jan 2014: 505 (2.1%)
Plans, plans, plansRequests for new plans: 86
Statutory EHCP issued total: 301
Transfer reviews held: 283
EHCP/statements ratio: 56% are now EHCP
No of transfer EHCP’s finalised:235
% of those received so far: 84%
What has worked well
Working with parents to:
• Programme to embed person centred planning
approaches; ‘Listen to Me’: 2010
• develop the LO from August 11 & publish May 12
• Work to co produce plans: from Sept 2012
• Trial plans - 43 non statutory EHCP
Listening to CYP and parents
Keeping in touch with CYP and parents
through the process
has made a difference
Feedback from families
For me it was really straightforward and simple. Very easy. My friend went through the previous system and I thought it was going to be awful.
This is the best meeting I have ever been to.All of the points of concern were covered: DadI was worried it would be going over the past again and I was really pleased it was focusing on the future: Mum
Quotes from professionals• The family centred and child centred nature of the MSPs and EHCPs is
fantastic, and will I'm sure change the focus of how we make provision for children, and give parents ownership, break down barriers etc
• The very positive aspects of the plans are the contributions they facilitate from young people. I have been stunned by the detail and perceptiveness of my students in analysing their own needs and for me this is by far the most positive thing about the EHCPs so far.
• I am sure there will be lots more issues as we trial the plans but my verdict is despite the workload they are definitely worth it, a huge improvement and a much more holistic way of working with young people. Thank you to everyone for their support so far.
Providing support to schools and settings
• Seconding SENCOs: peer support
• Hand holding
• STT, EPs, SEYST all working to implement reforms
• Working together on SEN funding banding..
– Gaining trust re funding
Support to colleagues
• Health and SC wrote their sections in the plan
• Lots of training events
• On going meetings with SC and health providers
through the year
Nos. transferred
• School aged: more transfers than planned this year.
Some schools have requested to do all of their
children in this year – mixed blessing
• PME providers: less than planned
• By end of Autumn 16 majority will be
transferred: 41 left
Challenges for our team
• SEN coordination capacity: 2 SENDOs, 1 manager,
seconded SENCOs; 1.1 FTE, 3.5 admin FTE in
coordination team (admin moving out of team)
• School and setting capacity: late return of review info
• Improving our quality assurance
• Learning to think Outcomes
More challenges
• Allied health professionals have been very engaged
and contribute well to plans
• Paediatricians prefer to send a clinic letter to filling in
the plan
• Supporting PME colleagues
– this is very new for them
Plans dataAutumn
TermSpring Term
Summer Term 1
Total
No. of transfer reviews held 93 98 91 283
No. of transfer reviews received by the SEN Team: % of those held so far
6873%
8479%
12999%
28199%
No of transfer reviews received within 14 days of the transfer review meeting:% of those received so far
4566%
3754%
4043%
12243%
No. of transfer reviews discussed by panel:% of those received so far
6697%
7895%
13599%
27999%
No. of draft EHCP’s sent to parents:% of those received so far
1319%
8263%
16597%
27397%
No of EHCP’s finalised:% of those received so far
23%
7651%
15784%
23584%
% completed within 14 weeks:% of those completed so far
2100%
3446%
7346%
10946%
On average plans were sent out ? days earlier than the 14 week deadline 2 days early 6 days late 29 days late 21 days late
Age of children/young people of plans issued in July 15
Year Group Number % of request received
Early Years 21 8%
Key Stage 1 12 5%
Key Stage 2 43 17%
Key Stage 3 49 19%
Key Stage 4 73 29%
Post 16 56 22%
PME ( non special school) 7
Transition plan
• Current year:– reception– year 6– year 11
Special schools chose their own transition plan time line
• Next year– year 2– year 3– year 5– year 6– year 9– Year 11– Year 13 +
Remembering why we are doing this
top related