potential impacts of market and non-market forces on live

Post on 10-Dec-2021

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Potential impacts of market and non-market forces on live ruminant post-production value losses – Evidence from Senegal

Abdrahmane Wane (CIRAD-PPZS-ILRI-PIL), Nadhem Mtimet (ILRI-PIL), Nelly Njiru (ILRI-PIL), Steve Staal (ILRI-PIL),

3rd International Conference on Global Food Security 20173-6 December 2017, Cape Town, South Africa

Conceptual framework of PPL in the ruminant valuechain (source: Wane & Mballo, 2016)

Way forward to improve methodology§ Given the large number of unknown variables, moving

towards a simulation and computable exercise onoptimization programme

§ Testing all indicators at value chain levels in semi-intensive and intensive production systems.

Global financial losses during pre-marketing andsales phases

Contact author: Dr Abdrahmane Wane:A.wane@cigar.org / awane@cirad.fr ● Box 30709 Nairobi Kenya ●+254 20 422 3000

This work was undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Policies,Institutions, and Markets (PIM) led by the International Food Policy Research Institute(IFPRI). This poster has not gone through IFPRI’s standard peer-review procedure. Theopinions expressed here belong to the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those ofPIM, IFPRI, or CGIAR.

References• Wane A. Mtimet N., Njiru N., Staal S., Okike I., Fadiga M., Katjiuongua

H. 2017a,b

Required parameters are missing or incorrect.

Non-market inputs - animals - natural resources - family labor

Market inputs - animals - wage Labor - animal feed

Productions - livestock - derivatives

(milk, butter)

Diversification

Global Productions

Stored Production

Sold Production

Self-consumed Production

Transportation

Final consumption

Main shocks

Bush

fires

(sco

re: 5

.00)

Anim

al d

isea

ses(

scor

e: 4

.6)

Clim

ate

(sco

re: 3

.84)

Mar

kets

(sco

re: 2

.62)

Conf

licts

(sco

re: 1

.81)

Locu

stin

vasi

ons (

scor

e: 1

.31)

LOSSES (volumes, quality, economic value)

Pastoral((produc-on(system(site(of(Tatki(Average'number'of'pastoral'se2lements:''105'

Pastoral(produc-on(system(site(of(Rewane(Average'number'of'pastoral'se2lements:'121'

Agropastoral((produc-on(system(site(of(Thiel(Average'number'of'agropastoral'se2lements:''163'''''''''''''Live'animal'value'chain'

Investigated areas

Average proportion of mortality during the pre-marketing phase (loss in quantity)

4,7

8,5

5,5

10,9

3,1

2,8

1,1

2,8

4,9

8,7

1,4 1,7

1,7

3,5

5,0

12,7

1,4 2,

42,5

4,8 5,1

11,0

1,9 2,3

MALE CATTLE FEMALE CATTLE

MALE SHEEP FEMALE SHEEP

MALE GOAT FEMALE GOAT

Tatki Rewane Thiel Total

Average proportion of theft during the pre-marketing phase (loss in quantity)

0,6

2,2

5,8

1,4

1,4 1,5

0,5 0,

8 1,1

2,2

1,5 1,6

0,4 0,

8

2,4

3,2

1,9

4,1

0,5

1,3

3,1

2,4

1,6

2,6

MALE CATTLE FEMALE CATTLE

MALE SHEEP FEMALE SHEEP

MALE GOAT FEMALE GOAT

Tatki Rewane Thiel Total20

%

21%

75%

20%

23%

1%

31%

14%

151%

22%

18% 26

%

15%

8%

176%

37%

19%

7%

26%

18%

147%

31%

25%

11%

MALE CATTLE FEMALE CATTLE MALE SHEEP FEMALE SHEEP MALE GOAT FEMALE GOAT

Tatki Rewane Thiel Overall average

top related