plant control - iea · 2009-04-10 · control of biological wwt 2002-03 gustaf olsson, iea, lund...

Post on 14-Apr-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Plant Control

Gustaf OlssonLund University,

SwedenGustaf.Olsson@iea.lth.se

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Content

• Nitrate recirculation control

• Carbon dosage control• Chemical precipitation control

• Phase length control• Plant wide control

• Sampling – measurements• Control computers

• Plant information systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Nitrate recirculation control

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Pre-denitrification plant

Aerobic reactor

Sludge outtakeSludge recirculation

Influent

Internal recirculation

Effluent

Anoxic reactor

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Nitrate recirculation control

���������

Flow rate (lines 3 and 4)

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Effluent total nitrogen

���������

Total N concentration (lines 3 and 4

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Comparison of ratio and NO3setpoint control

Recirculation rate

Total N

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

The Nitrifier concentration as function of DO and NO3

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Carbon dosage control

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Influence of C addition

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Carbon Dosage Control

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Chemical Precipitation Control

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Chemical dosage based on hydraulic load

Effluent PO4-P conc.

Ingildsen

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Chemical dosage based on P load

Effluent PO4-P conc.

Ingildsen

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Chemical dosage based on P sensor feedback

Effluent PO4-P conc.

Ingildsen

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Detailed Look into the Control

Standard deviation is typically 0.03 mg/l PO4-P

Ful

l-Sca

le C

ontr

ol E

xper

imen

ts

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Chemicals Consumption

Strategy Average dosing

(l/min)

Relative consump. (compared to in situ

controller)

Insitu 0.42 100%

Constant 0.66 167%

Flow proportional 0.62 156%

Load proportional 0.54 136%

Källby WWTP: 130 % of the insitu control was used in parallel line using load proportional control

Ful

l-Sca

le C

ontr

ol E

xper

imen

ts

(in compliance during 90 % of time)

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Phase length control

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

One day in an alternating plant (Avedore, Denmark)

NH4-N

DO

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Content

• Nitrate recirculation control

• Carbon dosage control• Chemical precipitation control

• Phase length control• Plant wide control

• Sampling – measurements• Control computers

• Plant information systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Plant Wide Control

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Plant Wide Control

• Prepare the plant for large disturbances• Coordinate sludge treatment and WW

treatment• How to return to “normal” operation?• Implementations are gaining momentum

but at a low speed

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Uncertainty at the Plant Level

• External disturbances– storms, concentration variations

• Compromise sewer capacity -plant capacity

• New regulations

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Plant Wide Control (1)

Key interactions:

• hydraulics• use of resources• recycles within the plant• the operator

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Plant Wide Control (2)

• System definition– control handles

– setpoints of concentrations (C, N, P)– disturbances

• Degrees of freedom• Constraints• Objective function

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Ex: Plant wide BNR control

• Highly variable load

• Automatic adjustments of setpoints using N and P sensors

• Phase control

• DO setpoint control• Pure oxygen

addition• Chemical dosage• Return sludge flow

rate

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Ex: Stormwater Control

Required settler volume:

Vclarifier =

= k * Q * SSto clar* SVI

Aeration tank settling (Krüger A/S)

During high loads:increase the settler volume

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Operational Aspects (1)

• Almost universal acceptance of ICA –still a great amount of opportunity to further apply ICA

• Surveys show approximately 50% of control loops are currently run in manual mode

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Operational Aspects (2)

• On-line sensors no longer the main limitation for on-line control

• The lack of process flexibility is more troublesome and limiting

• “Software sensors” can be used to further enhance the benefits of ICA

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Conclusions

• We have to assume that all the local controllers are working

• Good DO control is crucial for the rest!• Use NH4 sensor to determine DOref

• Nitrate recirculation vs. DO setpoint• Plant wide control: take couplings into

consideration!

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Content

• Nitrate recirculation control

• Carbon dosage control• Chemical precipitation control

• Phase length control• Plant wide control

• Sampling – measurements• Control computers

• Plant information systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Sampling

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Sampling (1)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110

10

20

30

40

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Sampling - alias (2)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Sampling - alias (3)

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.40

0.5

1

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.40

0.5

1

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Sampling -alias (4)

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.40

0.5

1

1.5

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Loop sampling interval (1)

• In commercial process control software: 1 – 10 times per second

• Using larger sampling intervals – reduces the load on the computer– reduces wear and tear on the actuator

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Loop sampling interval (2)

• Sampling rate 6-10 times the bandwidth• Sample 6-10 times within the rise time

of the step response• Take notice if the instrument analysis

time is long

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Measurements

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Signal transmissionMeasurement

principle

Level

Conc

Instru-ment

SampleTrans-mission

Scree-ning

Sto-rage

Valuedisplayed

App-lica-tion

Sen-sor

Trans-mission

Scree-ning

Sto-rage

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Visualisation

• What you measure is considered important => Work will be focused to improve what is measured

• To measure is to know• You can control what you measure• Without information you can not take

responsibility • With information you will take the

responsibility

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

1. Know the demand2. Measurement principle3. Transmission4. Validation5. Maintenance 6. The application7. Self diagnosis

Measurement Quality

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Common errors

• The sensor– Is the measurement

representative?– Is the sensor

mounted properly?– The sensor is never

better than the measurement principle

• Presentation– Do not show

unreasonable accuracy (DO conc = 2,54675 mg/l)

– Show the inaccuracy (DO conc = 2,5 +/-0,1 mg/l)

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Content

• Nitrate recirculation control

• Carbon dosage control• Chemical precipitation control

• Phase length control• Plant wide control

• Sampling – measurements• Control computers

• Plant information systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Control computers

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

The State Concept

Sequencing circuits

– one state at a time– state transfer

– conditions for each state transfer

1 2

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Grafcet 11

2

3

4

Close outlet valve

Pump on

Tank empty

Pump off

Heat on

Heat off

Wait_time = tim1

Open outlet valve

5

Empty ∗ start " True if the lower level sensor Empty = 1 and when a start order is given

" Starts the filling

Full " The level has reached the upper limit

" Stop filling and start heating

Temp " The desired temperature is reached

" Define waiting time = tim 1

Wait_time " The tim1 has expired

Empty " Tank is empty

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Grafcet 2• Developed in France 1977• Graf + AFCET (Association Francaise

pour la Cybernetique Economique et Technique)

• French standard 1982• IEC standard 1988 - IEC 848

(=SFC, Sequential Function Chart)• Essential part of IEC 61131-3

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

PLC programming

New standard 61131-3 implies:• definition of sequential function chart

(SFC), and 4 language options– instruction list– function block– ladder diagram

– structured text

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

PLC open

• PLC open is an organisation to support the standard IEC 61131-3

• Manufacturer and product independent• Members of the PLC open group are

expected to deliver products that follow the 61131-3 standard

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Plant information systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

The Operator

• Makes critical decisions in real time

• Well educated

•Demands improvement

Use the human resources to improve the process

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

OEE - Overall Equipment Efficiency

• Availability• Plant efficiency• Quality

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Process-industri

Plastindustrin Skärandebearbetning

Elektronik,övriga

Elelektronik-industrin

Plåtindustrin Elektronik,ytmontage

OEE in some industries

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Functional View

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Supervisory Level

• Time minutes to hours• Plant-Wide Control:

– model-based control– optimisation

– scheduling– decision support systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Management Level

Time - hours to days• Information Systems:

– production reporting– financial reporting

– production planning– decision support systems

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Reporting

• Key to successful management• Format reports CAREFULLY:

– apply KISS (Keep It Short & Simple) principle

– keep a high signal-to-noise ratio

– tailor reports by reader, time and place– organise information hierarchically (easy

lookup for custom reporting)

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Quality Information System

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Quality information

• Confidence limits for measurements• Check that a variable is not constant too

long• Compare measurements at the same

time• Compare measurements with models• Alarm for deviations from expected

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Decision Support

• Supervisory:– operational advice (encapsulating process

knowledge)– problem detection & diagnosis

• Management:– production planning constraints

(encapsulating process knowledge)

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Implementation

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Implementation Issues

• Accessibility - data flows and rights of access

• Reliability - architecture, redundancy, time to repair

• Flexibility - “standard” & common open architecture

• Equipment Constraints - avoid proprietary systems

• Cost - yes always, but compare to the benefits

Control of Biological WWT 2002-03

Gustaf Olsson, IEA, Lund University

Summary

• Many different time scales – sampling• Measurement quality• Who needs the information?• Quality in information• Information for decision support

top related