physics data processing - the online connection

Post on 18-May-2015

582 Views

Category:

Career

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

This presentation contains an overview of my work at Nikhef, the Dutch national institute for subatomic physics, in the last few years.

TRANSCRIPT

Physics Data Processing -The online connection

Nikhef colloquium9/2/2009

Sander Klous

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 2

Bob Hertzberger

The steamboat view

PDP Activities9/2/2009

My focus

Remote O

nline Farms

Use

Cas

es (i

.e. t

rigge

r per

form

ance

)

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 3

Remote Online Farms

• What is a remote online farm?• The connection to the online system• Event routing and streaming• Remote online farms in ATLAS (Hegoi Garitaonandia)

– Debug stream reprocessing– Trigger menu validation– Muon calibration stream

• Do we really need remote online farms?9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 4

Concept

9/2/2009

Amsterdam

NIKHEF/SARA

Data Acquisition40 MHz

Level 1

Level 2

Accept 1 in 500

Accept 1 in 50

Accept 1 in 10

Level 3

Computing grid

Networkswitch

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 5

Why is this interesting?

9/2/2009

Gary Stix, editor of Scientific American

Janu

ary

2001

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 6

Connection to the online system

9/2/2009

ROB

Data Collection Network

L2PU

EFEvent Filter

Back End Network

SFOMassstorage Building 513

ROF

Remote Event Processing Farms

ROF

ROFROF

Packet

Switched

(GEANT)

Ligh

t pat

hLocal Farm

ROBROBROB

SFISFISFILevel 2 Trigger

DDM

Routing and Streaming

Catalin Meirosu

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 7

Routing and Streaming introduction

9/2/2009

• Optimizing resources– Online, different routes– Offline, different streams

• Classification of events– Physics– Calibration– Debug– Express– Remote

Hans von der Schmitt

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 8

Regions of Interest andPartial Event Building

9/2/2009

Ignacio Aracena

Virtual Point 1

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 9

Inclusive or Exclusive streaming

9/2/2009

Hans von der Schmitt

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 10

Online monitoring of overlaps

9/2/2009

Brian Petersen

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 11

Luminosity blocks

9/2/2009 Hans von der Schmitt

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 12

raid25TB

TAGDB

load TAG

recon EXPR

recon PHYS

calib/align

disk150TB

CondDB

Dataacquisition

TIER-0

CASTOR

CPU farm

DDM/DQ2

TIER-1s

3201060

130

440

720

340

720

320

200

200

320

200

200

online

c1

c1

RAW

ESD

AOD

TAG

Express stream handling

9/2/2009

T0MDB

SFO

Rates in MB/s

Final Dress RehearsalData Quality Monitoring

Luc Goossens

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 13

Debug stream reprocessing

9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 14

Trigger menu validation

9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 15

Muon calibration

9/2/2009

Virtual Point 1

MuonCalibration

Group

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 16

Do we really need ROFs?

• At the moment: No, not really…– Not for physics at least

• Transition will be gradual– Example: debug stream reprocessing– Limited resources in the CERN Analysis Facility

• Funding will play an important role– Easier to fund online resources in home country– Other factors: energy consumption, human resources

• What will be the first physics use case?9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 17

Trigger performance

• Fully Hadronic decays of top pairs• The jet trigger challenge

– Determining trigger efficiencies from data– Tag and probe with leptons– T&P with semi-leptonic decays of top pairs

(Menelaos Tsiakiris)

– Turning the probe around, T&P with jets– Jet trigger efficiencies and rates

• Beyond multi-jet triggers– Topology triggers and remote online farms

9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 18

Fully Hadronic decaysof top-antitop pairs

9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 19

The jet trigger challenge

• QCD 6 jet background– 1000 to 10000 x Signal

• Is this possible at all?– Long term study

• First look at semi-leptonic decays– Study the possibility to trigger on jets– Extract jet trigger efficiency from data– Cross correlate with muon triggers9/2/2009

Turn on kicks in.Trigger problem

LambacherMunichO(1 fb-1)

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 20

Tagged Tagged and Probed

Trigger efficiency from data

Tag and probe• A first example:

di-muon decays of Z bosons

9/2/2009

20 GeV muon turn on curve (CSC note)

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 21

Semi leptonic decays of top pairs

• Tag on the jet side and probe on the muon side• Extract number of signal events (1 fb-1)

– Invariant mass reconstruction on hadronic side

9/2/2009

Possible problem: contamination with tau to muon decays

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 22

Event by event trigger efficiency

• Determine individual object efficiencies– Extrapolate T&P from di-muon decays of Z-bosons

• Combine objects into an event efficiency• Weigh the event appropriately

9/2/2009

Correct isolation withrespect to closest jet

Correct foreta dependencyWithout corrections

Tamsett – Royal Holloway

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 23

Turning the probe around

• More complicated– The jets are multi-object triggers,

e.g. 4J_95: 4 jets above 95 GeV– Thresholds are likely to change

• The missing link:– Trigger efficiency of Semi Leptonic decays– Fully Hadronic decays of top quark pairs

• Is it possible?– If not, can we do better?

9/2/2009

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 24

Topology triggers and remote online farms

Topology triggers• Time consuming

– Invariant masses– Likelihood fits

• Budget in point 1– 1500 machines x 8 cores per machine = 12000 cores– 3 kHz EF input rate from LVL2– 12000 / 3000 = 4 seconds per event (all triggers)9/2/2009

Xin Wu

Event FilterMean: 1.57 seconds

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

244

12

22

2.3

)175(

2.4

)(

2.4

)4.80(

3.9

)4.80(

01.0

1)(

hadTop

hadTop

lepTop

hadW

lepW

i i

i i

pcorT

pcorTi

MMMMM

EE

(Erik van der Kraaij)

Physics Data Processing - Sander Klous 25

Conclusion

• Remote Online Farms– An interesting research topic– Several farms already in production– Still far from enabling grid for online processing

• Physics Use Cases– Most likely complicated topologies– Fully hadronic decays of top quark pairs– Studies ongoing to understand trigger efficiencies

• The future of grid is in the online connection9/2/2009

top related