new insights into the aqueous phase of 2k pur formulations
Post on 22-Jan-2018
893 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
New insights into the aqueous phase of
2K PUR formulations via DGU measurements
Frédéric LUCAS, Jules MIKHAEL, Ulrich TROMSDORF
Wood
Industrial
Automotive
2K PUR
Coatings
Crosslinker
Dispersion
Introduction
2
2K-PUR Formulation:
Applications:
Cross-linker
Polyisocyanate
Binder Polyol
Solvent &
Additives
Coating
NCO
NCO
OCN
OH OH OH OH+ +
NH-C-O
O
NCO + HO
Urethane
IndustrialAutomotive Plastic
IndustrialAutomotive Plastic
Introduction
3
2K-PUR Formulation :
Applications :
Cross-linker
Polyisocyanate
Binder Polyol
Solvent &
Additives
Coating
NCO
NCO
OCN
OH OH OH OH+ +
NH-C-O
O
NCO + HO
Urethane
HDI-Based trimer
(Isocyanurate)
NCO
N
N
N(CH
2)6
(CH2)6
O
OO
NCO
(CH2)6
OCN
2K-PUR Formulation:
Applications:
Introduction
4
Cross-linker
Water-dispersible
Polyisocyanate
Coating
+ +
NH-C-O
O
NCO + HO
Urethane
NCOOCN
BinderPolyacrylate / Polyurethane
OH Dispersion
ACE ComponentsTransportationWood Coatings
5
NCO
NCO
OCN
H Hydrophile
NCO
NCO
OCN NCOOCN
+
NH-CO Hydrophile
Hydrophile acts as :
- a surfactant
- a protecting layer
Dispersible via mechanical or hand mixing
„Pot-life“ of several hours
Chemistry Dispersibilty Aqueous system
Technical solution: Polyisocyanate modification with a reactive hydrophile
H2OH2O
H2O
H2O
H2OH2O
H2O
H2O
Water-dispersible PolyisocyanatesSynthetic Route
6
Waterborne PUR
Formulations
Handling in waterborne 2K Polyurethane Technology
OH Dispersion
Water-emulsifiable
Polyisocyanate (PIC)
Addition of PIC
in the dispersion(pure or diluted)
?Formulation
Storage
Application
Coating
One question among others…
Study of the aqueous phase required
+
Separate Droplets Grafted Droplets Merged Droplets
Question: What is the nature of the aqueous phase after mixing ?
7
Film FormationPot-life
Density Gradient Ultra-centrifugation
Principle
RadiusCentr. field
RotorAxe Detector
Analytical Ultra-centrifuge:• Up to 60.000 rpm • Up to 300.000 g
8
8
Density Gradient Ultra-centrifugation
The perfect tool
Density Gradient
de
nsi
ty
H2O sugar
1
2
cell radius
0,85 0,90 0,95 1,00 1,05 1,10 1,15 1,20 1,25 1,30 1,35
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6H2O- 4Meth / 0,15 NY
6H2O- 4Meth / 0,10 NY
5H2O- 5Meth / 0,10 NY
2H2O- 8Meth / 0,15 NY
2H2O- 8Meth / 0,10 NY
4H2O- 6Meth / 0,10 NY
H2O / 0,06 NY
H2O / 0,08 NY
H2O / 0,10 NY
H2O / 0,12 NY
H2O / 0,15 NY
H2O / 0,20 NY
H2O / 0,25 NY
Gra
die
nt
Dichte [g/cm³]
D2O / 0,25 NY
Gradient Ranges with Nycodenz after 22h
Separation by density - and not by particle size or particle morphology
The density difference between the polyisocyanates (1,20 g/cm3) and the dispersion
(1,11-1,17 g/cm3) is large enough to perform DGU measurements
9
Proof of Concept
First formulation: Easy peasy!
10
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion A
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
Density (g/cm3)
11
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion B
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
Density (g/cm3)
Proof of Concept
The tree that hides the forest
12
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion B
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
?
Density (g/cm3)
Proof of Concept
The tree that hides the forest
13
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion B
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
?
TEM Imaging
with EDX (N atom):
Density (g/cm3)
Proof of Concept
Grafting does occur
14
Results from feasibility study:
Next steps: Elucidate factors influencing grafting
• Dispersion: Presence of “water-solubles”, functionality
• Polyisocyanate: Steric vs Anionic stabilization
• Formulation: Index
2 Dispersions – 2 Situations
Why?
-OHHO--OHHO-
OH Dispersion A OH Dispersion B
Large particlesEmulsifer as surfactants
Primary OHLow Index
= SEPARATE DROPLETS
Small particles Polymer as surfactant
OH + other functional groupHigh Index
=GRAFTED DROPLETS
15
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion
OH Dispersion + „water-solubles“
Density (g/cm3)
Influence of the OH Dispersion
Presence of „water-solubles“
Presence of
„water-solubles“ =
GRAFTING
16
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion
OH Dispersion + funct. groups
Introduction of funct.
groups = GRAFTING
Density (g/cm3)
Influence of the OH Dispersion
Presence of functional groups
17
Polyisocyanatesteric 1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
FORMULATION
Dispersion
Ionic hydrophile =
GRAFTING
Polyisocyanateionic
SINGLE COMPONENTS
Density (g/cm3)
Influence of the Polyisocyanate
Steric vs Ionic Hydrophile
Influence of the Formulation
Index
SINGLE COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
Index 40
Index 100
OH Dispersion B
Higher Index =
more GRAFTING
Polyisocyanatesteric 1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
Density (g/cm3)
Results
Snap-shot
Summary:
- No “water-solubles”
- Primary OH funct.
- Polyisocyanate steric
- Low Index
- “water-solubles”
- Funct. Groups
- Polyisocyanate ionic
- High Index
OH Dispersion
Water-dispersible
Polyisocyanate+-OHHO-
Separate
Particles
Grafted
Particles
-OHHO-
Pot-life measurements: Study using commercial products
Trends observed during DGU study validated in practical situations
Degree of grafting correlates with the pot-life… generally !
Deviations exist: Influence of additional factors (mixing, co-solvent, type of
polyisocyanate, polarity…)
Dispersion 1 Dispersion 2 Dispersion 3 Dispersion 4
Funct. groups No Yes Yes Yes
„Water-solubles“ No Yes Yes No
Hydrophilic Steric Ionic Steric Steric
Degree of grafting 0% < 5% > 30% 20%
Pot-Life > 6 hours App. 4 hours < 2 hours App. 5 hours
Fine but…
Can we use these results ?
2130.03.2017 CONFIDENTIAL - Dr. A.Panchenko, CI/BA
We create chemistry
top related