new insights into the aqueous phase of 2k pur formulations
TRANSCRIPT
New insights into the aqueous phase of
2K PUR formulations via DGU measurements
Frédéric LUCAS, Jules MIKHAEL, Ulrich TROMSDORF
Wood
Industrial
Automotive
2K PUR
Coatings
Crosslinker
Dispersion
Introduction
2
2K-PUR Formulation:
Applications:
Cross-linker
Polyisocyanate
Binder Polyol
Solvent &
Additives
Coating
NCO
NCO
OCN
OH OH OH OH+ +
NH-C-O
O
NCO + HO
Urethane
IndustrialAutomotive Plastic
IndustrialAutomotive Plastic
Introduction
3
2K-PUR Formulation :
Applications :
Cross-linker
Polyisocyanate
Binder Polyol
Solvent &
Additives
Coating
NCO
NCO
OCN
OH OH OH OH+ +
NH-C-O
O
NCO + HO
Urethane
HDI-Based trimer
(Isocyanurate)
NCO
N
N
N(CH
2)6
(CH2)6
O
OO
NCO
(CH2)6
OCN
2K-PUR Formulation:
Applications:
Introduction
4
Cross-linker
Water-dispersible
Polyisocyanate
Coating
+ +
NH-C-O
O
NCO + HO
Urethane
NCOOCN
BinderPolyacrylate / Polyurethane
OH Dispersion
ACE ComponentsTransportationWood Coatings
5
NCO
NCO
OCN
H Hydrophile
NCO
NCO
OCN NCOOCN
+
NH-CO Hydrophile
Hydrophile acts as :
- a surfactant
- a protecting layer
Dispersible via mechanical or hand mixing
„Pot-life“ of several hours
Chemistry Dispersibilty Aqueous system
Technical solution: Polyisocyanate modification with a reactive hydrophile
H2OH2O
H2O
H2O
H2OH2O
H2O
H2O
Water-dispersible PolyisocyanatesSynthetic Route
6
Waterborne PUR
Formulations
Handling in waterborne 2K Polyurethane Technology
OH Dispersion
Water-emulsifiable
Polyisocyanate (PIC)
Addition of PIC
in the dispersion(pure or diluted)
?Formulation
Storage
Application
Coating
One question among others…
Study of the aqueous phase required
+
Separate Droplets Grafted Droplets Merged Droplets
Question: What is the nature of the aqueous phase after mixing ?
7
Film FormationPot-life
Density Gradient Ultra-centrifugation
Principle
RadiusCentr. field
RotorAxe Detector
Analytical Ultra-centrifuge:• Up to 60.000 rpm • Up to 300.000 g
8
8
Density Gradient Ultra-centrifugation
The perfect tool
Density Gradient
de
nsi
ty
H2O sugar
1
2
cell radius
0,85 0,90 0,95 1,00 1,05 1,10 1,15 1,20 1,25 1,30 1,35
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6H2O- 4Meth / 0,15 NY
6H2O- 4Meth / 0,10 NY
5H2O- 5Meth / 0,10 NY
2H2O- 8Meth / 0,15 NY
2H2O- 8Meth / 0,10 NY
4H2O- 6Meth / 0,10 NY
H2O / 0,06 NY
H2O / 0,08 NY
H2O / 0,10 NY
H2O / 0,12 NY
H2O / 0,15 NY
H2O / 0,20 NY
H2O / 0,25 NY
Gra
die
nt
Dichte [g/cm³]
D2O / 0,25 NY
Gradient Ranges with Nycodenz after 22h
Separation by density - and not by particle size or particle morphology
The density difference between the polyisocyanates (1,20 g/cm3) and the dispersion
(1,11-1,17 g/cm3) is large enough to perform DGU measurements
9
Proof of Concept
First formulation: Easy peasy!
10
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion A
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
Density (g/cm3)
11
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion B
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
Density (g/cm3)
Proof of Concept
The tree that hides the forest
12
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion B
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
?
Density (g/cm3)
Proof of Concept
The tree that hides the forest
13
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion B
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
?
TEM Imaging
with EDX (N atom):
Density (g/cm3)
Proof of Concept
Grafting does occur
14
Results from feasibility study:
Next steps: Elucidate factors influencing grafting
• Dispersion: Presence of “water-solubles”, functionality
• Polyisocyanate: Steric vs Anionic stabilization
• Formulation: Index
2 Dispersions – 2 Situations
Why?
-OHHO--OHHO-
OH Dispersion A OH Dispersion B
Large particlesEmulsifer as surfactants
Primary OHLow Index
= SEPARATE DROPLETS
Small particles Polymer as surfactant
OH + other functional groupHigh Index
=GRAFTED DROPLETS
15
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion
OH Dispersion + „water-solubles“
Density (g/cm3)
Influence of the OH Dispersion
Presence of „water-solubles“
Presence of
„water-solubles“ =
GRAFTING
16
Polyisocyanate
1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22SINGLE
COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
OH Dispersion
OH Dispersion + funct. groups
Introduction of funct.
groups = GRAFTING
Density (g/cm3)
Influence of the OH Dispersion
Presence of functional groups
17
Polyisocyanatesteric 1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
FORMULATION
Dispersion
Ionic hydrophile =
GRAFTING
Polyisocyanateionic
SINGLE COMPONENTS
Density (g/cm3)
Influence of the Polyisocyanate
Steric vs Ionic Hydrophile
Influence of the Formulation
Index
SINGLE COMPONENTS
FORMULATION
Index 40
Index 100
OH Dispersion B
Higher Index =
more GRAFTING
Polyisocyanatesteric 1,12 1,14 1,16 1,18 1,20 1,22
Density (g/cm3)
Results
Snap-shot
Summary:
- No “water-solubles”
- Primary OH funct.
- Polyisocyanate steric
- Low Index
- “water-solubles”
- Funct. Groups
- Polyisocyanate ionic
- High Index
OH Dispersion
Water-dispersible
Polyisocyanate+-OHHO-
Separate
Particles
Grafted
Particles
-OHHO-
Pot-life measurements: Study using commercial products
Trends observed during DGU study validated in practical situations
Degree of grafting correlates with the pot-life… generally !
Deviations exist: Influence of additional factors (mixing, co-solvent, type of
polyisocyanate, polarity…)
Dispersion 1 Dispersion 2 Dispersion 3 Dispersion 4
Funct. groups No Yes Yes Yes
„Water-solubles“ No Yes Yes No
Hydrophilic Steric Ionic Steric Steric
Degree of grafting 0% < 5% > 30% 20%
Pot-Life > 6 hours App. 4 hours < 2 hours App. 5 hours
Fine but…
Can we use these results ?
2130.03.2017 CONFIDENTIAL - Dr. A.Panchenko, CI/BA
We create chemistry