missile systems lethality enhancement through the use of a ... · pdf fileconducting aerosol...

Post on 06-Feb-2018

222 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

03-0049, Slide 1

40Th Annual Armament Systems-Guns-Ammunition Rockets Missiles

40Th Annual Armament Systems-Guns-Ammunition Rockets Missiles

Allen StultsUS Army RDECOM AMRDEC

AMSRD-AMR-PS-WFallen.stults@us.army.mil

Missile Systems Lethality Enhancement through the use of a

Conducting Aerosol Plasma Warhead27 April 2005

03-0049, Slide 2

Multi-Functional Warheads Are Lethal Against a Large Target Set

Multi-Functional Warheads Are Lethal Against a Large Target Set

• Enhanced blast and fragmenting warheads have been successfully combined with shaped charges to service multiple target types with the same missile warhead, such as in Joint Common Missile. These are termed multi-purpose warheads.

• The next class of future missile systems can be further improved by adding RF effects to broaden the target set and enhance lethality

• The first step is to demonstrate additional effects without degrading existing capabilities

03-0049, Slide 3

Multi-Effects Electromagnetic WarheadMulti-Effects Electromagnetic Warhead

Cell phoneCell phone

RadioRadio

ComputerComputer

GPS Jammer

GPS Jammer

Vehicle Ignition System

Vehicle Ignition System

Develop and Integrate Warheads into Missile

Systems to Destroy and Disable Electronic Systems

and their Operators in Support of Combat Forces

Develop and Integrate Warheads into Missile

Systems to Destroy and Disable Electronic Systems

and their Operators in Support of Combat Forces

EMP for ElectronicsEMP for Electronics

Enhanced Blast for Personnel LethalityEnhanced Blast for Personnel Lethality

Fragments for Equipment Lethality

Fragments for Equipment Lethality

03-0049, Slide 4

Three Major Products From Missile Laboratory to Missile Programs

Three Major Products From Missile Laboratory to Missile Programs

• Improved Anti-Armor Precursor Charge

• Enhanced GMLRS Bomblet or Cargo Round payload

• Next Generation 2.75” Rocket Warhead

03-0049, Slide 5

Baseline Warhead Trade StudiesBaseline Warhead Trade Studies

• EM Measurements of Detonations and Plasma Characterizations

• Non-Ideal Explosives for Shape Charges/ Conductive Metal Antennas and Masonry destruction

Improved Seed Sources Program, SBIR leverage of FEG and FMG

• EM Measurements of Detonations and Plasma Characterizations

• Non-Ideal Explosives for Shape Charges/ Conductive Metal Antennas and Masonry destruction

Improved Seed Sources Program, SBIR leverage of FEG and FMG

03-0049, Slide 6

TOW Tip Charge Flash X-rayTOW Tip Charge Flash X-ray

03-0049, Slide 7

Plasma EntrainmentPlasma Entrainment

03-0049, Slide 8

Test Set-UpTest Set-Up

03-0049, Slide 9

Test Article N5 and Metal Fuel Rich MixTest Article N5 and Metal Fuel Rich Mix

03-0049, Slide 10

Filled test ArticleFilled test Article

03-0049, Slide 11

Representative Cover PlatesRepresentative Cover Plates

03-0049, Slide 12

Demonstration of Deflagration Effects on Masonry Targets

Demonstration of Deflagration Effects on Masonry Targets

• Test various mixes of approximately 50 grams of aluminum powder pyrotechnic and thermite

• Gather fireball size, expansion rate and duration data for modeling efforts

• Investigating switch timing requirements to load dynamic plasma antenna

• Demonstrate robustness of masonry destructiveness at 10 CDs stand-off

03-0049, Slide 13

Test 1Test 1

03-0049, Slide 14

Test 1 VideoTest 1 Video

03-0049, Slide 15

Test 1 – High Speed VideoTest 1 – High Speed Video

03-0049, Slide 16

Test 1 – Masonry DestructionTest 1 – Masonry Destruction

03-0049, Slide 17

Test 2Test 2

03-0049, Slide 18

Test 3Test 3

03-0049, Slide 19

Test 4Test 4

03-0049, Slide 20

Test 5Test 5

03-0049, Slide 21

Test 6Test 6

03-0049, Slide 22

Test 7Test 7

03-0049, Slide 23

Conclusions and PlansConclusions and Plans

• Conductive Plasmas made from Deflagrating mixtures have significant destructive effects on masonry

• Significant Differences in Similar Mixes Allow the EM Designer a Robust set of Design Characteristics

• Temperature and Conductivity Effects will be further tested this Summer

03-0049, Slide 24

ThanksThanks

Joey Reed and Mike Kennemer for all their help in experimental conduct

George Arkoosh for his help in video production

Larry Altgilbers for his encouragement and advice

top related