marine life protection act initiativedfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_040109g1.pdf · 2013. 6. 11. · 0...

Post on 08-Sep-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Marine Birds Evaluation for the MLPA South Coast Study Region

Dan Robinette, MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team

Presentation to the Master Plan Science Advisory TeamApril 1, 2009 • Los Angeles, CA

Marine Life Protection Act Initiative

G.1

Packet Pg. 230

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Methods Overview

• Benefits to Marine Birds– Direct: Decreased disturbance at breeding, resting and

foraging sites– Indirect: Protection of prey populations

• Five Analyses– Protection of seabird breeding colonies– Protection of seabird roost sites– Protection of near-colony foraging areas– Protection of neritic foraging ‘hot spots’– Protection of estuarine and coastal habitat

• Round 1 analyses considered only state marine reserves (SMRs)

G.1

Packet Pg. 231

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Seabird Breeding Colonies

0

20

40

60

80

100

18 Spp(59,018)

ASSP(1,274*)

BLOY(97)

BRCO(5,922*)

BRPE(2,690)

LETE(2,049*)

PECO(430)

PIGU(1,179)

XAMU(5,150*)

% o

f So

Cal

Pop

ulat

ion

W IslandsM IslandsE IslandsS MainlandN Mainland

Distribution of Total Seabird Population and SLTB (values in parentheses indicate population estimates)

• These population estimates will be updated prior to the Round 2 analysisSLTB =

G.1

Packet Pg. 232

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Seabird Breeding Colonies

Protection of all Breeding Seabird Colonies

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Bio

regi

on P

opul

atio

n

W IslandsM IslandsE IslandsS MainlandN Mainland

Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External

G.1

Packet Pg. 233

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population

D100 %90.9 %29.0 %36.8 %Ext CN0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Ext BU0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Ext AO100 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Top BR100 %9.1 %29.0 %36.8 % Top A

100 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Opl BT0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Opl AX100 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Lap BE0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Lap AN0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Prop 0

N MainlandS MainlandEast IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands

SLTB: Brandt’s Cormorant

Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External

G.1

Packet Pg. 234

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population

100 %66.7 %33.3 %13.3 %Ext C0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Ext B0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Ext A

100 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Top B100 %33.3 % 33.3 %13.3 %Top A

0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Opl B0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Opl A0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Lap B0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Lap A0 %0 %36.1 %13.3 %Prop 0

N MainlandEast IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands

SLTB: Black Oystercatcher

Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External

G.1

Packet Pg. 235

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population

100 %6.5 %66.3 %Ext C0 %6.5 %66.3 %Ext B0 %6.5 %66.3 %Ext A

100 %6.5 %66.3 %Top B100 %6.5 %66.3 %Top A

0 %6.5 %66.3 %Opl B0 %6.5 %66.3 %Opl A0 %6.5 %66.3 %Lap B0 %6.5 %66.3 %Lap A0 %6.5 %66.3 %Prop 0

N MainlandMid IslandsWest Islands

100 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %

100 %13.6 %55.4 %100 %13.6 %55.4 %

0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %

N MainlandMid IslandsWest Islands

SLTB: Pelagic Cormorant SLTB: Pigeon Guillemot

Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External

G.1

Packet Pg. 236

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population

39.3 % 26.1 %Ext C0 %0 %Ext B0 %0 %Ext A0 %2.0 %Top B0 %6.5 %Top A0 %5.3 %Opl B0 %2.0 %Opl A

39.3 %12.9 %Lap B0 %0 %Lap A0 %0 %Prop 0

N MainlandS Mainland

93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %

Mid Islands

SLTB: Least TernSLTB: Brown

Pelican

Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External

G.1

Packet Pg. 237

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population

D11.3 %75.0 %Ext CN11.3 %75.0 %Ext BU11.3 %75.0 %Ext AO11.3 %75.0 %Top BR11.3 %75.0 %Top A

11.3 %75.0 %Opl BT11.3 %75.0 %Opl AX11.3 %75.0 %Lap BE11.3 %75.0 %Lap AN11.3 %75.0 %Prop 0

East IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands

D0.1 %100 %N0.1 %100 %U0.1 %100 %O0.1 %100 %R0.1 %100 %

0.1 %100 %T0.1 %100 %X0.1 %100 %E0.1 %100 %N0.1 %100 %

East IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands

SLTB: Ashy Storm-Petrel SLTB: Xantus’s Murrelet

Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External

G.1

Packet Pg. 238

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Seabird Roost Sites

• Focused on brown pelicans

• Currently have data only for mainland sites

• Classified sites by level of importance

– High: >500 birds– Medium: 100 – 500

birds– Low: never >100

birds

G.1

Packet Pg. 239

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Mainland RoostsNorth Mainland

South Mainland

02468

1012

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

Num

ber o

f Roo

sts

HighMediumLow

02468

1012

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

Num

ber o

f Roo

sts

HighMediumLow

G.1

Packet Pg. 240

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Near-Colony Foraging Areas

• Focused on five species: Brandt’s cormorant, pelagic cormorant, pigeon guillemot, least tern, and bald eagle

• Calculated Foraging Index (FSMR) for protection within SMRsFSMR = • pi x fi

where pi = colony population and fi = amount of foraging area within SMR

• Compared FSMR to Maximum Foraging Index calculated as if study region was all one SMR

Fmax = • pi x fi

where pi = colony population and fi = amount of foraging area within study region

• Figures show percent of maximum potential foraging area protected under each array

FSMR / Fmax x 100

G.1

Packet Pg. 241

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Near-Colony Foraging AreasBrandt’s Cormorant

Pelagic Cormorant

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Max

For

agin

g In

dex

S MainlandE IslandsM IslandsW Islands

02468

101214161820

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Max

For

agin

g In

dex

N MainlandM IslandsW Islands

G.1

Packet Pg. 242

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Near-Colony Foraging AreasPigeon Guillemot

Least Tern

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Max

For

agin

g In

dex

N MainlandM IslandsW Islands

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Max

For

agin

g In

dex

S MainlandN Mainland

G.1

Packet Pg. 243

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Estuarine and Coastal Habitat

• Goal was to evaluate protection areas used by waterfowl, marsh birds and shorebirds

• Audubon Christmas Bird Count data did not provide adequate coverage of study region

• Focused on habitat protection instead– Analyzed amount of estuarine habitat protected– Analyzed amount of coastal marsh, tidal flat and

beach habitat protected

G.1

Packet Pg. 244

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Estuarine and Coastal Habitat

020406080

100120140160180200

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Ava

ilabl

e H

abita

t

S MainlandN Mainland

Estuaries

Coastal Marshes

020406080

100120140160180200

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Ava

ilabl

e H

abita

t

S MainlandN Mainland

G.1

Packet Pg. 245

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Estuarine and Coastal Habitat

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Ava

ilabl

e H

abita

t

S MainlandN MainlandE Islands

Tidal Flats

Beaches

0

100

200

300

400

500

Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C

% o

f Ava

ilabl

e H

abita

t

S MainlandN MainlandE IslandsM IslandsW Islands

G.1

Packet Pg. 246

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Summary

• Seabird Breeding Colonies– External C provides the most protection in all

bioregions– Lapis B and Topaz A provide more protection within

mainland bioregions– All other arrays similar to Proposal 0 (existing MPAs)

• Seabird Roost Sites– Lapis A, Topaz A and Topaz B provide greatest

protection for north mainland bioregion– Lapis B, Opal B and Topaz A provide greatest

protection for south mainland bioregion

G.1

Packet Pg. 247

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

Summary

• Near-Colony Foraging Areas– Brandt’s cormorant and pelagic cormorant receive

most protection from proposed arrays– Most protection occurs within mainland bioregions.– Lapis B, Opal B and External C provide greatest

protection for Brandt’s Cormorant– Topaz B provides greatest protection for pelagic

cormorant• Estuarine and Coastal Habitats

– Estuaries and coastal marshes receive the most protection

– Lapis B and External C provide the most protection of these habitats

G.1

Packet Pg. 248

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

For SAT DiscussionAt-Sea Seabird Densities

Brandt’s Cormorant

G.1

Packet Pg. 249

Bri

efin

g D

ocu

men

t G

.1:

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Eva

luat

ion

Res

ult

s P

PT

(13

77 :

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

and

Mam

mal

s

top related