marine life protection act initiativedfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/agenda_040109g1.pdf · 2013. 6. 11. · 0...
TRANSCRIPT
Marine Birds Evaluation for the MLPA South Coast Study Region
Dan Robinette, MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team
Presentation to the Master Plan Science Advisory TeamApril 1, 2009 • Los Angeles, CA
Marine Life Protection Act Initiative
G.1
Packet Pg. 230
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Methods Overview
• Benefits to Marine Birds– Direct: Decreased disturbance at breeding, resting and
foraging sites– Indirect: Protection of prey populations
• Five Analyses– Protection of seabird breeding colonies– Protection of seabird roost sites– Protection of near-colony foraging areas– Protection of neritic foraging ‘hot spots’– Protection of estuarine and coastal habitat
• Round 1 analyses considered only state marine reserves (SMRs)
G.1
Packet Pg. 231
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Seabird Breeding Colonies
0
20
40
60
80
100
18 Spp(59,018)
ASSP(1,274*)
BLOY(97)
BRCO(5,922*)
BRPE(2,690)
LETE(2,049*)
PECO(430)
PIGU(1,179)
XAMU(5,150*)
% o
f So
Cal
Pop
ulat
ion
W IslandsM IslandsE IslandsS MainlandN Mainland
Distribution of Total Seabird Population and SLTB (values in parentheses indicate population estimates)
• These population estimates will be updated prior to the Round 2 analysisSLTB =
G.1
Packet Pg. 232
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Seabird Breeding Colonies
Protection of all Breeding Seabird Colonies
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Bio
regi
on P
opul
atio
n
W IslandsM IslandsE IslandsS MainlandN Mainland
Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External
G.1
Packet Pg. 233
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population
D100 %90.9 %29.0 %36.8 %Ext CN0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Ext BU0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Ext AO100 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Top BR100 %9.1 %29.0 %36.8 % Top A
100 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Opl BT0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Opl AX100 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Lap BE0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Lap AN0 %0 %29.0 %36.8 %Prop 0
N MainlandS MainlandEast IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands
SLTB: Brandt’s Cormorant
Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External
G.1
Packet Pg. 234
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population
100 %66.7 %33.3 %13.3 %Ext C0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Ext B0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Ext A
100 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Top B100 %33.3 % 33.3 %13.3 %Top A
0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Opl B0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Opl A0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Lap B0 %0 %33.3 %13.3 %Lap A0 %0 %36.1 %13.3 %Prop 0
N MainlandEast IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands
SLTB: Black Oystercatcher
Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External
G.1
Packet Pg. 235
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population
100 %6.5 %66.3 %Ext C0 %6.5 %66.3 %Ext B0 %6.5 %66.3 %Ext A
100 %6.5 %66.3 %Top B100 %6.5 %66.3 %Top A
0 %6.5 %66.3 %Opl B0 %6.5 %66.3 %Opl A0 %6.5 %66.3 %Lap B0 %6.5 %66.3 %Lap A0 %6.5 %66.3 %Prop 0
N MainlandMid IslandsWest Islands
100 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %
100 %13.6 %55.4 %100 %13.6 %55.4 %
0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %0 %13.6 %55.4 %
N MainlandMid IslandsWest Islands
SLTB: Pelagic Cormorant SLTB: Pigeon Guillemot
Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External
G.1
Packet Pg. 236
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population
39.3 % 26.1 %Ext C0 %0 %Ext B0 %0 %Ext A0 %2.0 %Top B0 %6.5 %Top A0 %5.3 %Opl B0 %2.0 %Opl A
39.3 %12.9 %Lap B0 %0 %Lap A0 %0 %Prop 0
N MainlandS Mainland
93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %93.5 %
Mid Islands
SLTB: Least TernSLTB: Brown
Pelican
Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External
G.1
Packet Pg. 237
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Percent of Bioregion Breeding Population
D11.3 %75.0 %Ext CN11.3 %75.0 %Ext BU11.3 %75.0 %Ext AO11.3 %75.0 %Top BR11.3 %75.0 %Top A
11.3 %75.0 %Opl BT11.3 %75.0 %Opl AX11.3 %75.0 %Lap BE11.3 %75.0 %Lap AN11.3 %75.0 %Prop 0
East IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands
D0.1 %100 %N0.1 %100 %U0.1 %100 %O0.1 %100 %R0.1 %100 %
0.1 %100 %T0.1 %100 %X0.1 %100 %E0.1 %100 %N0.1 %100 %
East IslandsMid IslandsWest Islands
SLTB: Ashy Storm-Petrel SLTB: Xantus’s Murrelet
Prop = Proposal Lap = Lapis Opl = Opal Top = Topaz Ext = External
G.1
Packet Pg. 238
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Seabird Roost Sites
• Focused on brown pelicans
• Currently have data only for mainland sites
• Classified sites by level of importance
– High: >500 birds– Medium: 100 – 500
birds– Low: never >100
birds
G.1
Packet Pg. 239
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Mainland RoostsNorth Mainland
South Mainland
02468
1012
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
Num
ber o
f Roo
sts
HighMediumLow
02468
1012
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
Num
ber o
f Roo
sts
HighMediumLow
G.1
Packet Pg. 240
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Near-Colony Foraging Areas
• Focused on five species: Brandt’s cormorant, pelagic cormorant, pigeon guillemot, least tern, and bald eagle
• Calculated Foraging Index (FSMR) for protection within SMRsFSMR = • pi x fi
where pi = colony population and fi = amount of foraging area within SMR
• Compared FSMR to Maximum Foraging Index calculated as if study region was all one SMR
Fmax = • pi x fi
where pi = colony population and fi = amount of foraging area within study region
• Figures show percent of maximum potential foraging area protected under each array
FSMR / Fmax x 100
G.1
Packet Pg. 241
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Near-Colony Foraging AreasBrandt’s Cormorant
Pelagic Cormorant
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Max
For
agin
g In
dex
S MainlandE IslandsM IslandsW Islands
02468
101214161820
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Max
For
agin
g In
dex
N MainlandM IslandsW Islands
G.1
Packet Pg. 242
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Near-Colony Foraging AreasPigeon Guillemot
Least Tern
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Max
For
agin
g In
dex
N MainlandM IslandsW Islands
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Max
For
agin
g In
dex
S MainlandN Mainland
G.1
Packet Pg. 243
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Estuarine and Coastal Habitat
• Goal was to evaluate protection areas used by waterfowl, marsh birds and shorebirds
• Audubon Christmas Bird Count data did not provide adequate coverage of study region
• Focused on habitat protection instead– Analyzed amount of estuarine habitat protected– Analyzed amount of coastal marsh, tidal flat and
beach habitat protected
G.1
Packet Pg. 244
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Estuarine and Coastal Habitat
020406080
100120140160180200
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Ava
ilabl
e H
abita
t
S MainlandN Mainland
Estuaries
Coastal Marshes
020406080
100120140160180200
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Ava
ilabl
e H
abita
t
S MainlandN Mainland
G.1
Packet Pg. 245
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Estuarine and Coastal Habitat
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Ava
ilabl
e H
abita
t
S MainlandN MainlandE Islands
Tidal Flats
Beaches
0
100
200
300
400
500
Prop 0 Lap A Lap B Opl A Opl B Top A Top B Ext A Ext B Ext C
% o
f Ava
ilabl
e H
abita
t
S MainlandN MainlandE IslandsM IslandsW Islands
G.1
Packet Pg. 246
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Summary
• Seabird Breeding Colonies– External C provides the most protection in all
bioregions– Lapis B and Topaz A provide more protection within
mainland bioregions– All other arrays similar to Proposal 0 (existing MPAs)
• Seabird Roost Sites– Lapis A, Topaz A and Topaz B provide greatest
protection for north mainland bioregion– Lapis B, Opal B and Topaz A provide greatest
protection for south mainland bioregion
G.1
Packet Pg. 247
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
Summary
• Near-Colony Foraging Areas– Brandt’s cormorant and pelagic cormorant receive
most protection from proposed arrays– Most protection occurs within mainland bioregions.– Lapis B, Opal B and External C provide greatest
protection for Brandt’s Cormorant– Topaz B provides greatest protection for pelagic
cormorant• Estuarine and Coastal Habitats
– Estuaries and coastal marshes receive the most protection
– Lapis B and External C provide the most protection of these habitats
G.1
Packet Pg. 248
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s
For SAT DiscussionAt-Sea Seabird Densities
Brandt’s Cormorant
G.1
Packet Pg. 249
Bri
efin
g D
ocu
men
t G
.1:
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
Eva
luat
ion
Res
ult
s P
PT
(13
77 :
Mar
ine
Bir
ds
and
Mam
mal
s