john santa md mph, health advisor/consultant

Post on 24-Feb-2016

24 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

John Santa MD MPH, Health Advisor/Consultant. April 2008. The Problem. Half of what doctors do is evidence-based. Unnecessary care harms patients and wastes $$$. System poorly organized for comparing treatments and providers. Consumers are lost in the maze. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

John Santa MD MPH, Health Advisor/Consultant

April 2008

2

The Problem

Half of what doctors do is evidence-based. Unnecessary care harms patients and

wastes $$$. System poorly organized for comparing

treatments and providers. Consumers are lost in the maze. Conflict-of-interest is rife in health care. Doctors lack information to make the best

possible clinical decisions. Consumers lack information to choose

among treatment and provider options.

3

Barriers to Change

Comparative effectiveness research is very expensive.

Aggregation of data and findings is hard. Data is inconsistent across states, health plans,

benefit designs. Some companies resist sharing data. Doctors are hard to reach and influence. Consumers are skeptical, worry about access

being blocked. Some industries fanning consumer fears.

4

Our mission since 1936 … an expert, independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, whose mission is to work for a fair, just, and safe marketplace for all consumers.

What we do: test, inform and protect.

Consumer Reports

5

Consumers want trustworthy, easy-to-understand, actionable information.

No commercial agendas, advertiser influences or financial relationships.

Involve consumers from the outset in choosing topics for evaluation and effective translation methods.

Work with advisors and groups who are independent and unbiased.

Consumers love ratings!

Our Approach

6

Our Health Ratings to Date

Health Plans Nursing Homes Health Care Products & Devices Nutritional Supplements Medical Treatments Prescription Drugs

Identifying CR Best Buy Drugs• Start with credible source of

unbiased, rigorous analysis of clinical evidence about drug effectiveness (DERP)

• Intense medical input through consultants, internal CU review, and medical peer review

• Selections based on effectiveness, safety record, and price

8

What We Found

Cholesterol Drugs – For most people, new generics are just as good.

Alzheimer’s Drugs – Not very effective in preventing mental decline.

Diabetes Drugs – Newer, expensive medications are no better and less safe.

Heartburn Drugs – Over-the-Counter drugs just as good as expensive brands.

9

Millions view information on www.CRBestBuyDrugs.org or other partner Web sites.

Medco uses CRBBD content. In one initiative, 4.3% of statin users switched to lower-cost generics. Savings: $8 million.

The Wisconsin Education Association Trust also used CRBBD materials. Savings: $455,000 from switch to lower-cost heartburn drugs.

10

11

Policy Issues

Need reliable source of ongoing funding for comparative effectiveness research.

Test ways to incorporate comparative effectiveness into benefit design and reimbursement.

Target funding at consumer friendly “translations” and dissemination.

Payment reform must reward providers for using evidence-based practices.

Explore tiered co-pays to reward consumers for choosing evidence-based care.

12

Policy Issues

Eliminate conflict-of-interest at critical decision points (training, research, regulation, purchasing, point of care).

Create more conflict-free independent “islands” of health research and delivery, like DERP and AHRQ’s Evidence-Based Practice Centers.

Educate consumers on what “transparency” really means to them.

Deploy HIT & e-Rx to dramatically improve patient safety.

top related