jeannie rea - nteu - workforce participation: how staff voices are heard
Post on 21-Jan-2017
92 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Jeannie Rea, National President, NTEUUniversity Governance and Regulation Forum, Sydney 5-6
September 2016
Elected by staff to governance bodies
Selected by management
Participation in management and governance bodies and committees as part of duties
Through consultation processes -committees, surveys and open meetings
“The national approach to higher education is to “reflect the increasingly corporate nature of modern universities, which are multi-million dollar enterprises, and to encourage universities to undertake commercial activities and engage in collaborative activities with other universities across State borders.”
Source: Cth, 2005, Building Better Foundations for Higher Education in Australia: A Discussion About Re-aligning Commonwealth-State Responsibilities
“This includes at the system level a growing belief in the benefits of the marketplace in higher education governance, leading to a growing reliance on competition in the distribution of public funds for teaching and research.
“At the institutional level the role and position of formally appointed or elected leaders, managers and administrators have been strengthened and professionalised at the cost of the general involvement of the academic staff in institutional governance matters.”
IM Larssen, P Maassen & B Stensaker, 2009, “Four basic dilemmas in university governance”, Jnl HE Management and
Policy, 21/3.
The ‘academics’ in academic governance diminished ◦ Academic Boards & Committees
◦ Faculty Boards and Committees
Most participants’ role now designated by their professional or management position, not as part of academic role
Reasons I have been told
◦ Not the role for staff
◦ Constrained by self-interest
◦ Other members constrained to speak with staff
◦ Not the corporate model
◦ Haven’t liked some staff reps
◦ Do not have expertise or skill sets required
Conflict of interest
Confidentiality
Commercial in Confidence
“Higher education teaching personnel should have the right and opportunity, without discrimination of any kind, according to their abilities, to take part in governing bodies and to criticise the functioning of higher education institutions, including their own, while respecting the right of other sections of the academic community to participate, and they should also have the right to elect the majority of representatives to academic bodies within the higher education institution.”
Principle of university autonomy recognised internationally
Intellectual freedom of staff and students now enshrined in federal legislation as being required in university policy◦ Exercised through participation in university
governance, as well through education and research
Critical to course approval and accreditation
Distinguishes a university
Industrial representation and professional advocacy
What is discussed and decided does matter:◦ From university commercial partnerships◦ To investment in online resources as
response to budget crisis◦ To letting precarious employment keep
increasing as proportion of university jobs◦ Tuition fees ◦ Policy on internationalisation◦ Research priorities◦ Opening and closing sites........
Because university governance matters
Universities do have a particular role in society
Critic and conscience
For the public good
In the public interest
Public expectations and confidence
Accountability – public money
Union’s interest is in purposeful participation by staff (and students) in decision making on education and research through governance bodies with real power
For further discussion:
jrea@nteu.org.au
www.nteu.org.au
top related