item #4 ppt 517 alta
Post on 06-Apr-2017
20 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Case # 630FSignificance & Compatibility
Review517 Alta
Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director
City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 4
July 25, 2016
CASE # 630F - SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish
100% of the existing main structure inorder to construct a new single familyresidence with detached accessorystructure.
3
BACKGROUND
Zoned SF-A North side of Alta, between La Jara &
Woodway. Significance Review was approved by the
ARB on 11/18/14 and by Council on12/18/14.
5
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 9,375 9,375Main House Footprint 1,908 2,705Front Porch 108Side Porch 1 195Side Porch 2Rear PorchGarage Footprint 483 610Carport FootprintShed(s) FootprintBreezeways 50Covered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 2,391 / 9,375 3,560 / 9,375Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 25% 38%
6
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 9,375 9,375Main House 1st Floor 1,908 2,705Main House 2nd Floor 905Garage 1st Floor 483 610Garage 2nd Floor
Other Structures
FAR / Lot Area 2,391 / 9,375 4,220 / 9,375
Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 25% 45%
7
POLICY ANALYSIS
25” in height (max allowed 33’). Complies with all regulations concerning
setbacks, height, and loomingstandards.
8
POLICY ANALYSIS
Building materials Stucco stone wainscot wood awning wood shutters Barrel Tile roof
9
POLICY ANALYSIS Tree Removal (59 total inches)
(1) 32” Pecan (1) 27” Oak
Tree Mitigation (59 total inches onsite) (2) 8” Live Oaks (3) 6” Live Oaks (4) 4.25” Magnolias
10
POLICY ANALYSIS Existing 1,908 sq. ft. home was built in
1941. (Significance Review) No evidence that
the home was: built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance
22
ARB RECOMMENDATION
ARB Review – June 21, 2016
No significance in existing structure
Replacement structure is compatible
Approved as presented
23
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty
Responses received:
Support: (2)
Oppose: (1)
top related