item #4 ppt 517 alta

24
Case # 630F Significance & Compatibility Review 517 Alta Presented By: Jason Lutz Community Development Services Director City Council Meeting Agenda Item # 4 July 25, 2016

Upload: marian-vargas-mendoza

Post on 06-Apr-2017

20 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Case # 630FSignificance & Compatibility

Review517 Alta

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 4

July 25, 2016

CASE # 630F - SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish

100% of the existing main structure inorder to construct a new single familyresidence with detached accessorystructure.

3

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-A North side of Alta, between La Jara &

Woodway. Significance Review was approved by the

ARB on 11/18/14 and by Council on12/18/14.

4

5

LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 9,375 9,375Main House Footprint 1,908 2,705Front Porch 108Side Porch 1 195Side Porch 2Rear PorchGarage Footprint 483 610Carport FootprintShed(s) FootprintBreezeways 50Covered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 2,391 / 9,375 3,560 / 9,375Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 25% 38%

6

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 9,375 9,375Main House 1st Floor 1,908 2,705Main House 2nd Floor 905Garage 1st Floor 483 610Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures

FAR / Lot Area 2,391 / 9,375 4,220 / 9,375

Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 25% 45%

7

POLICY ANALYSIS

25” in height (max allowed 33’). Complies with all regulations concerning

setbacks, height, and loomingstandards.

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

Building materials Stucco stone wainscot wood awning wood shutters Barrel Tile roof

9

POLICY ANALYSIS Tree Removal (59 total inches)

(1) 32” Pecan (1) 27” Oak

Tree Mitigation (59 total inches onsite) (2) 8” Live Oaks (3) 6” Live Oaks (4) 4.25” Magnolias

10

POLICY ANALYSIS Existing 1,908 sq. ft. home was built in

1941. (Significance Review) No evidence that

the home was: built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance

11

EXISTING SITE PLAN

12

EXISTING STRUCTURE

13

EXISTING STRUCTURE

14

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

15

FRONT ELEVATION

16

FRONT ELEVATION

17

REAR ELEVATION

18

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION

19

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

20

EXISTING STREETSCAPE

21

PROPOSED STREETSCAPE

22

ARB RECOMMENDATION

ARB Review – June 21, 2016

No significance in existing structure

Replacement structure is compatible

Approved as presented

23

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (2)

Oppose: (1)

QUESTIONS?