internet search engines: fluctuations in document accessibility

1Internet search engines: Fluctuations in document accessibility

• Wouter MettropCWI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

• Paul NieuwenhuysenVrije Universiteit Brussel, and

Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Belgium

http://www.cwi.nl/cwi/projects/IRTPresented at NOM 2000

New York Hilton May 16-18, 2000

3

WWW

WWW: growing number of WWW servers

01000000200000030000004000000500000060000007000000

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

4

Internet based information sources: how many? how much?

In 2000: • about 1 billion = 1000 million

unique URLs in the total Internet• about 10 terabyte (= 10 000 gigabyte) of text data

5

Internet information retrieval systems in 2000

• Several types of systems exist to retrieve information:»Directories of selected sources categorised by subject,

made by humans, mainly for browsing.»Search systems, based on databases with machine made

indexes, for word-based searching!»“Meta-search” or “multi-threaded” search systems.

• We have studied and compared several well-known international (and a few national) word-based Internet search engines.

6

Internet information retrieval systems: evaluation criteria

• Many aspects/criteria can be considered in the evaluation of an Internet search engine, including»coverage of documents present on WWW (studies exist);»number of elements of a document, that are indexed

to make them usable for retrieval = “depth of indexing”;…• We started to study the depth of indexing

and we were soon confronted with the fluctuations in the performance that do exist.

• We think that these fluctations are another important aspect of performance.

7

Internet information retrieval systems: our research group

The following persons have been involved in the research: • Louise Beijer (Hogeschool van Amsterdam, The Netherlands)• Hans de Bruin (Unilever Research Laboratorium, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands)• Hans de Man (JdM Documentaire Informatie, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands)• Rudy Dokter (PNO Consultants, Hengelo, The Netherlands)• Marten Hofstede ( Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands)• Wouter Mettrop (CWI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)• Paul Nieuwenhuysen (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium)• Eric Sieverts (Hogeschool van Amsterdam, and RUU, The Netherlands)• Hanneke Smulders (Infomare, Terneuzen, The Netherlands)• Hans van der Laan (Consultant, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands)• Ditmer Weertman (ADLIB, Utrecht, The Netherlands)

8

Internet search engines: research on indexing functionality

• Our method to assess the indexing functionality of search engines:»A “rich” test document with many element types has been

created»Identical test documents were placed

at 8 sites in 2 countries»A procedure was set up to assess retrieval

—in an automatic way —with regular intervals

9

0 8 16

Number of our test documents thatwere retrieved at least once during theinvestigation period

Number of our test documents that were retrieved

10

Internet search engines : reachability

• 14 528 queries were sent to 13 search engines.

• Search engines were 721 times unreachable.

• The percentage of unreachability varies from nearly 0% to nearly 15%.

• The studied search engines were reachable for 95% of the queries.

11

Internet search engines: elements of test document studied

• title tag• META-tags:

keywords, description and author• comment tag• ALT tag• text/URL of a link to a document• H3 tag• table header• text of:

an internal link, a reference anchor, a link to a sound file

• name of a sound file (au/wav/aiff/ra)

• text of a link to an image• name of an image file

(gif or jpg; inline or linked to)• name of a Java applet

(with or without extension class)• terms after the first 100 lines in a

document (200/…/700)• the URL of a document

12

0 5 10 15 20 25

Number of studieddocument elementsthat were indexedat least once duringthe observationperiod

Number of the studied document elements that were indexed

13

Search engine indexing functionality: conclusions

• Considerable differences among search engines exist in their depth of indexing!

• Not “all of the static web” is indexed.»Not each of our test documents/pages.»Not all HTML elements of our test document/page.

• Some of the studied search engines showed changes in the indexing policy during the experiment fluctuations…

14

Internet search engines: fluctuations - definition

• A fluctuation appears when the result set of an observation - i.e.» one query or » set of queries

misses documents with respect to a frame of reference - i.e.» other observations and » knowledge about Web reality

15

Internet search engines: detecting fluctuations

• Through time: comparing result sets of 1 observation repeatedly performed » Observation = one query or set of queries» Frame of reference = other observations & web-knowledge

• One moment: consistency of result sets» Observation = one query in set of queries» Frame of reference = other observations

16

Internet search engines: types of fluctuations

• Through time: comparing result sets of 1 observation repeatedly performed » “Document fluctuations”» “Indexing fluctuations”

• One moment: consistency of result sets» “Element fluctuations”

17

A

B

C

18Document fluctuations:

example 1

TIME

19Document fluctuations:

example 2

TIME

20

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100AltaVista

Euroferret Excite

HotBot Ilse

Infoseek Lycos

MSNNorthernLight

Search.nlSnap

VindexWebcrawler

Average percentage offorgotten documents perround

Percentage of roundswith one or moreforgotten documents

Document fluctuations: experimental results

21

22

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Average percentageof missed documentsper result set =Percentage of resultsets with missingdocuments

Indexing fluctuations:experimental results

23

A1 A1 A1A2 A2 A2

A3 A4 A3 A4 A3 A4

24

Element fluctuations: example

012345678

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Number of documents retrieved by HotBot in every query in observation set 23

25

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Average percentage ofmissed documents perresult-set

Percentage of result-setsthat were incomplete

Element fluctuations: experimental results

26

0 10 20 30 40 50

Lost by elementfluctuations

Lost by documentfluctuations

Lost by indexingfluctuations

Percentage of documents missed due to fluctuations

28

Fluctuations: remarks on “correctness”

• Fluctuations can be seen as “correct”, if they are reflections of alterations in:»(web-) reality

— then document, indexing and element fluctuations are incorrect

»the indexed database of a search engine— then only element fluctuations are incorrect

• Users do not care; they miss documents

29

Fluctuations:remarks on “size”

• No relation document / element fluctuations < ===== > “size”

• Percentage missed documents determines (with other reducing effects, such as depth of indexing) the effective size of an engine

30

Fluctuations:remarks on “importance”

• Users of information»should be aware of the existence of fluctuations»should observe them systematically

• Providers of information»should be aware of the existence of fluctuations

• Quantitative analyses of the web are hindered by fluctuations»scientometrics; citation analysis»fluctuations lower the effective size of an index

31

Internet search engines: conclusions of our research

• Search engines differ in depth of indexing documents.• Search engines make mistakes:

»They are subject to changes in indexing policy.(“indexing fluctuations”)

»They forget documents completely (“document fluctuations”)

»They miss documents in their result sets (“element fluctuations”).

• Considerable differences exist among search engines regarding these fluctuations.

32

Internet search engines: recommendations related to fluctuations

• Fluctuations are “normal”; do not be surprised; do not worry.

• Do not try to find a simple explanation to fully understand what happens.

• Known item searchers should repeat the search »when using an engine with many element fluctuations; use

other search terms;»when using an engine with many document fluctuations:

repeat later.