internet search engines: fluctuations in document accessibility
DESCRIPTION
Internet search engines: Fluctuations in document accessibility. Wouter Mettrop CWI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Paul Nieuwenhuysen Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Belgium http://www.cwi.nl/cwi/projects/IRT - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1Internet search engines: Fluctuations in document accessibility
• Wouter MettropCWI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
• Paul NieuwenhuysenVrije Universiteit Brussel, and
Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Belgium
http://www.cwi.nl/cwi/projects/IRTPresented at NOM 2000
New York Hilton May 16-18, 2000
3
WWW
WWW: growing number of WWW servers
01000000200000030000004000000500000060000007000000
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
4
Internet based information sources: how many? how much?
In 2000: • about 1 billion = 1000 million
unique URLs in the total Internet• about 10 terabyte (= 10 000 gigabyte) of text data
5
Internet information retrieval systems in 2000
• Several types of systems exist to retrieve information:»Directories of selected sources categorised by subject,
made by humans, mainly for browsing.»Search systems, based on databases with machine made
indexes, for word-based searching!»“Meta-search” or “multi-threaded” search systems.
• We have studied and compared several well-known international (and a few national) word-based Internet search engines.
6
Internet information retrieval systems: evaluation criteria
• Many aspects/criteria can be considered in the evaluation of an Internet search engine, including»coverage of documents present on WWW (studies exist);»number of elements of a document, that are indexed
to make them usable for retrieval = “depth of indexing”;…• We started to study the depth of indexing
and we were soon confronted with the fluctuations in the performance that do exist.
• We think that these fluctations are another important aspect of performance.
7
Internet information retrieval systems: our research group
The following persons have been involved in the research: • Louise Beijer (Hogeschool van Amsterdam, The Netherlands)• Hans de Bruin (Unilever Research Laboratorium, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands)• Hans de Man (JdM Documentaire Informatie, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands)• Rudy Dokter (PNO Consultants, Hengelo, The Netherlands)• Marten Hofstede ( Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands)• Wouter Mettrop (CWI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)• Paul Nieuwenhuysen (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium)• Eric Sieverts (Hogeschool van Amsterdam, and RUU, The Netherlands)• Hanneke Smulders (Infomare, Terneuzen, The Netherlands)• Hans van der Laan (Consultant, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands)• Ditmer Weertman (ADLIB, Utrecht, The Netherlands)
8
Internet search engines: research on indexing functionality
• Our method to assess the indexing functionality of search engines:»A “rich” test document with many element types has been
created»Identical test documents were placed
at 8 sites in 2 countries»A procedure was set up to assess retrieval
—in an automatic way —with regular intervals
9
0 8 16
Number of our test documents thatwere retrieved at least once during theinvestigation period
Number of our test documents that were retrieved
10
Internet search engines : reachability
• 14 528 queries were sent to 13 search engines.
• Search engines were 721 times unreachable.
• The percentage of unreachability varies from nearly 0% to nearly 15%.
• The studied search engines were reachable for 95% of the queries.
11
Internet search engines: elements of test document studied
• title tag• META-tags:
keywords, description and author• comment tag• ALT tag• text/URL of a link to a document• H3 tag• table header• text of:
an internal link, a reference anchor, a link to a sound file
• name of a sound file (au/wav/aiff/ra)
• text of a link to an image• name of an image file
(gif or jpg; inline or linked to)• name of a Java applet
(with or without extension class)• terms after the first 100 lines in a
document (200/…/700)• the URL of a document
12
0 5 10 15 20 25
Number of studieddocument elementsthat were indexedat least once duringthe observationperiod
Number of the studied document elements that were indexed
13
Search engine indexing functionality: conclusions
• Considerable differences among search engines exist in their depth of indexing!
• Not “all of the static web” is indexed.»Not each of our test documents/pages.»Not all HTML elements of our test document/page.
• Some of the studied search engines showed changes in the indexing policy during the experiment fluctuations…
14
Internet search engines: fluctuations - definition
• A fluctuation appears when the result set of an observation - i.e.» one query or » set of queries
misses documents with respect to a frame of reference - i.e.» other observations and » knowledge about Web reality
15
Internet search engines: detecting fluctuations
• Through time: comparing result sets of 1 observation repeatedly performed » Observation = one query or set of queries» Frame of reference = other observations & web-knowledge
• One moment: consistency of result sets» Observation = one query in set of queries» Frame of reference = other observations
16
Internet search engines: types of fluctuations
• Through time: comparing result sets of 1 observation repeatedly performed » “Document fluctuations”» “Indexing fluctuations”
• One moment: consistency of result sets» “Element fluctuations”
17
A
B
C
18Document fluctuations:
example 1
TIME
19Document fluctuations:
example 2
TIME
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100AltaVista
Euroferret Excite
HotBot Ilse
Infoseek Lycos
MSNNorthernLight
Search.nlSnap
VindexWebcrawler
Average percentage offorgotten documents perround
Percentage of roundswith one or moreforgotten documents
Document fluctuations: experimental results
21
22
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Average percentageof missed documentsper result set =Percentage of resultsets with missingdocuments
Indexing fluctuations:experimental results
23
A1 A1 A1A2 A2 A2
A3 A4 A3 A4 A3 A4
24
Element fluctuations: example
012345678
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Number of documents retrieved by HotBot in every query in observation set 23
25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Average percentage ofmissed documents perresult-set
Percentage of result-setsthat were incomplete
Element fluctuations: experimental results
26
0 10 20 30 40 50
Lost by elementfluctuations
Lost by documentfluctuations
Lost by indexingfluctuations
Percentage of documents missed due to fluctuations
28
Fluctuations: remarks on “correctness”
• Fluctuations can be seen as “correct”, if they are reflections of alterations in:»(web-) reality
— then document, indexing and element fluctuations are incorrect
»the indexed database of a search engine— then only element fluctuations are incorrect
• Users do not care; they miss documents
29
Fluctuations:remarks on “size”
• No relation document / element fluctuations < ===== > “size”
• Percentage missed documents determines (with other reducing effects, such as depth of indexing) the effective size of an engine
30
Fluctuations:remarks on “importance”
• Users of information»should be aware of the existence of fluctuations»should observe them systematically
• Providers of information»should be aware of the existence of fluctuations
• Quantitative analyses of the web are hindered by fluctuations»scientometrics; citation analysis»fluctuations lower the effective size of an index
31
Internet search engines: conclusions of our research
• Search engines differ in depth of indexing documents.• Search engines make mistakes:
»They are subject to changes in indexing policy.(“indexing fluctuations”)
»They forget documents completely (“document fluctuations”)
»They miss documents in their result sets (“element fluctuations”).
• Considerable differences exist among search engines regarding these fluctuations.
32
Internet search engines: recommendations related to fluctuations
• Fluctuations are “normal”; do not be surprised; do not worry.
• Do not try to find a simple explanation to fully understand what happens.
• Known item searchers should repeat the search »when using an engine with many element fluctuations; use
other search terms;»when using an engine with many document fluctuations:
repeat later.