indiana’s major moves projects asphalt pavement association of indiana
Post on 09-Feb-2016
38 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Indiana’sMajor Moves Projects
Asphalt Pavement Associationof Indiana
Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOECommissioner
INDOTDecember 13, 2012
Six district offices 3,630 employees
1,600 Highway Technicians 800 Managers/Supervisors 300 Engineers
$389 million/annual operating budget
$1 billion/annual capital expenditures
28,400 total roadway lane miles 5,300 INDOT-owned bridges
INDOT Profile785
2,845
CO
Districts
Customer Satisfaction Survey
Building new highways
Adding lanes to existing highways
Minimizing congestion on highways
Removing debris from highways
Ensuring roadway striping on highways is visible
Keeping highway shoulders in good condition
Water drains quickly from highway surfaces
Repairing and maintaining bridges
Removing snow and ice from highways
Repairing and maintaining existing highways
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
8%
13%
21%
25%
27%
28%
29%
67%
69%
74%
Rated by percentage of respondents who rated the items as one of their top five choices.
Items that residents thought were critical for INDOT.
Contractor Satisfaction Survey
31%
38%
18%
13%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied
Rating of IN-DOT districts & CO
Satisfaction Levels with INDOT’s Performance Regarding Communication & Cooperation.
Contractor Satisfaction Survey
INDOT is willing to consider your input on decisions
Your awareness of the status of imminent and current INDOT projects that affect you
Your awareness of future INDOT plans
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
44%
70%
71%
Percentage of respondents Very Satisfied/Satisfied
Satisfaction levels with INDOT’s performance regarding communication & cooperation.
2012 INDOT Awards
Month Organization / Award Project/ProgramFebruary AASHTO / Project of the Week Sherman Minton Bridge
August ITE / Public Agency Achievement AwardNew Management Philosophy & Strategy
SeptemberCouncil of State Community Development Agencies (COSCDA) / Presidential Award for Innovation Stellar Communities
October AASHTO / Performance Excellence Award DamageWise
OctoberAASHTO / Performance Excellence Award – Gold Award Propane Vehicle Program
OctoberPopular Science Magazine / 25th Annual Best of What’s New Milton-Madison Bridge Project
OctoberConstruction Management Association of America (CMAA) / CMAA Award Sherman Minton Bridge
October CG/LA / Strategic Project of the YearOhio River Bridges - East End Crossing
November ACEC / Engineering Excellence Award Honor Award I-69 Sections 2-3
INDOT Investment FY 2006-15
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013* FY 2014* FY 2015*$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
Construction InvestmentsM
illio
ns
Includes construction, utility relocations and railroad expenditures.* FY13, FY14 and FY15 include P3 Financing that have yet to reach financial closure
Interstate Truck Trends
Pavement & Bridge Preservation
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Pavement & Bridge Preservation SpendingFY 2005-15
Mill
ions
Based on award amounts at time of letting. FY 2008-2009 include ARRA projects.2013 thru 2015 are estimated as of Nov 2012
Major Moves Projects
Project Miles % Miles Let
Est. $ CN Cost (m)
Final Letting
Open to Traffic
I-80/94 Interchange - 100 $197 2009 Aug. 2011Accelerate 465 11 100 $423 2010 Dec. 2012US 24 Fort to Port 11 100 $93 2010 Nov. 2012I-69 Evansville to Crane 67 100 $620 2011 Nov. 2012
Milton-Madison Bridge 1 100 $104 2010 April 2013US 31 Kokomo 13 100 $155 May 2012 Dec. 2013SR 25 Hoosier Heartland 36 100 $327 July 2012 Dec. 2013US 31 Plymouth to South Bend 20 92 $223 April 2013 Dec. 2014I-69 Crane to Bloomington 27 79 $400 March 2013 Dec. 2014US 31 Hamilton County 13 16 $320 Spring 2013 Dec. 2015
Total 199 $2.9B
Hoosier Heartland (SR 25) 36 miles Ribbon cuttings:
Oct. 24, 2012: 12 miles – I-65 to US 421
December 2013: 24 miles – US 421 to US 24
Open to traffic: Dec. 2013 CN Cost: $327 million
Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting
Hoosier Heartland at Clymers, Cass County.
Fort to Port (US 24) 11 miles Open to traffic: Nov. 14,
2012 CN Cost: $93 million
Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting
US 24/Fort to Port at Webster Road, Allen County.
Interstate 69 Sections 1-3: 67
miles Evansville to Crane
Open to traffic:Nov. 19, 2012
CN Cost: $620 million
Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting
I-69, Daviess County.
US 31 Hamilton County
13 miles 16% let
Final letting: Spring 2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2015 CN Cost: $320 million
US 31 at SR 38, Hamilton County.
Major Moves
Interstate 69 Section 4: 27 miles
Crane to Bloomington 79% let
Bid openings: Segment 3: Dec. 12, 2012 Segment 2: March 2013
Open to traffic: Dec. 2014
Est. CN Cost: $400 million
Major Moves
Interstate 69 Section 5: 21 miles
Bloomington to Martinsville DEIS published: Oct. 26,
2012 RFI issued: Dec. 4, 2012 Public hearing: Dec. 6,
2012 ROD anticipated: Spring
2013 Construction to start: FY
2014 Est. CN Cost: $350 million
Major Moves
Total Cost: $2.6 billion Federal ROD approval:
June 20, 2012 Kentucky: Downtown
Crossing Indiana: East End Crossing East End Groundbreaking:
Aug. 30, 2012 Public Hearing: Dec. 1,
2012 IFA Determination: Dec. 3,
2012 Open to Traffic: October
2016
P3 Projects - Ohio River Bridges
P3 Projects - East End Crossing
Indiana Sections
48 miles from I-55 to I-65 Tolled expressway Environmental Impact Study
Preferred Route B3 announced Oct. 18, 2012 Tier One ROD anticipated in January 2013 Tier Two ROD anticipated in July 2014
P3 Projects - Illiana Corridor
Pavement Conditions
Pavement Condition Ratings are measured by Road Roughness, using the International Roughness Index (IRI).
In 2011, 3,060 of INDOT’s Lane Miles were in Fair or Poor Condition. If Preservation Spending Levels Remain Constant, it is Estimated that 4,445 Lane Miles will be Rated Fair or Poor by 2022, an Increase of 1,385 Miles (45%).
16
2006 2011 2017 20220%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
17%11% 13% 16%
13%11% 12%
14%
70%78% 75% 70%
Excellent/GoodSatisfactoryFair/Poor
Projec
ted
Federal Highway Bill (MAP-21) Indiana Impact:
FY 2013: $923M FY 2014: $931M Effective Date: October 1, 2012 Increased TIFIA program Increased tolling ability for new & added
capacity projects New performance measures & asset
management requirements
Pavement Selection Process Based on appropriate pavement
treatment design Existing pavement type, thickness &
distress level Ability of possible solutions to address the
problem, situation or pavement distresses present
Near-term and long-term cost effectiveness Construction costs Least cost of ownership
Right treatment, right time, right cost Engineering feasibility
1&1/2” resurface vs. 8” resurface vs. reconstruct, etc. Business case suitability
Interstate vs. minor state highway Budgetary impacts acceptability
Pavement Selection Process Considers not just HMA or PCCP, but also
possible & feasible treatment levels of intensity
Basic levels of intensity are: Routine or preventive maintenance Surface treatment
Chip-seal, PPI, mill-&-fill, etc. Minor structural treatment
2-lift overlay Major structural treatment
Rubberize, thick HMA or PCCP overlay Pavement construction or replacement
Pavement Peer Group Pavement Steering Committee Successor District pavement engineers & pavement
area engineers are pavement owners Everyone else works to support them
Forum for broad discussion of pavement issues so pavement owners can make decisions
To include agency, engineering consultants, construction industry, etc.
Chapter 304 Revisions Incorporate new agency pavement
organization, i.e., district pavement engineers, pavement area engineers, etc.
Incorporate new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) philosophy & methodology (Darwin M-E software)
More clearly delineate pavement treatment, selection expectations for internal & external designers
Reflect increase reliance on pavement design engineers’ professional judgment
Alternate Bidding HMA & PCCP options considered Best results when alternate pavement
type considerations determined early in project development
9% (+/-) construction savings typically No longer FHWA experiment, Pavement
Selection Process Continued discussion on lower limit Future looking into alternate treatments
at PPI level?
Thank You
top related