iatrogenic effect of orthodontic by almuzian
Post on 22-Mar-2017
37 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Iatrogenic Effects of Orthodontic TreatmentMohammed ALMUZIAN
13University of Glasgow
Table of ContentsDefinition..............................................................................................................................................4
The potential hazards of orthodontic treatment are four area of interest: Elis and Benson 2002...........4
Tissue damage.......................................................................................................................................6
Intra-oral................................................................................................................................................6
Hard tissue damages..............................................................................................................................6
Enamel demineralisation.......................................................................................................................6
Definition..............................................................................................................................................6
Aetiology...............................................................................................................................................6
Classification.........................................................................................................................................6
Incidences..............................................................................................................................................7
Predictors for the development of white spot lesions.............................................................................7
Zone of demineralization.......................................................................................................................7
Complications........................................................................................................................................7
Enamel demineralisation is important to the orthodontist in three ways:...............................................8
Prevention of demineralization..............................................................................................................8
Treatment of enamel decalcification, Welbury & Carter, 1993...........................................................10
Enamel Fractures.................................................................................................................................11
Aetiology.............................................................................................................................................11
Prevalence...........................................................................................................................................12
Prevention............................................................................................................................................12
Interproximally stripped enamel..........................................................................................................12
Peridodontium problems......................................................................................................................13
Types...................................................................................................................................................13
Periodontal problems are important to the orthodontist.......................................................................13
Incidence.............................................................................................................................................13
Prevention............................................................................................................................................14
Gingival recession...............................................................................................................................15
Etiology...............................................................................................................................................15
Treatment............................................................................................................................................15
ANUG.................................................................................................................................................16
Sign and symptoms..............................................................................................................................16
Treatment............................................................................................................................................16
Alveolar bone loss...............................................................................................................................16
Incidence.............................................................................................................................................16
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 1
Root Damage OIIRR...........................................................................................................................17
History.................................................................................................................................................17
Definition............................................................................................................................................17
Location of OIIRR.................................................................................................................................17
Mineral content & physical properties of cementum...........................................................................17
1. Mineral content........................................................................................................................18
2. Elastic modulus........................................................................................................................18
Prevalence...........................................................................................................................................18
OIIRR tends to occur commonly in the apical region because............................................................19
Patho-physiology of OIIRR.................................................................................................................19
Diagnosis of OIIRR.............................................................................................................................19
Classification of root resorption..........................................................................................................20
Important to the orthodontist in three ways.........................................................................................21
Factors that influence the severity of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) 21
Repair and clinical consequences of OIIRR........................................................................................26
Prevention and management of OIIRR................................................................................................26
A. Before treatment..................................................................................................................26
B. Treatment of choice.............................................................................................................27
C. During treatment..................................................................................................................27
D. After treatment.....................................................................................................................27
Pulp damage........................................................................................................................................28
Incidence.............................................................................................................................................28
Aetiology.............................................................................................................................................28
Prevention and managements..............................................................................................................28
Soft-tissue damage...............................................................................................................................29
1. Direct damage by removable or fixed components..................................................................29
Aetiology.............................................................................................................................................29
Prevention............................................................................................................................................29
Prevention............................................................................................................................................30
2. Indirect damage by allergic reactions to nickel and latex.........................................................31
Allergies..............................................................................................................................................31
Hypersensitivity reactions:..................................................................................................................31
Latex Allergy.......................................................................................................................................31
Prevalence...........................................................................................................................................31
Individuals susceptible to allergic reactions include............................................................................31
How Should Potential Orthodontic Patients with Suspected Latex Allergy Be Managed?..................32
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 2
Nickel hypersensitivity........................................................................................................................32
Introduction.........................................................................................................................................32
Sign and symptom...............................................................................................................................33
Prevalence...........................................................................................................................................33
Treatment............................................................................................................................................33
Cytotoxicity.........................................................................................................................................34
Treatment failure.................................................................................................................................34
Increasing predisposition to other disorders........................................................................................35
Systemic effects...................................................................................................................................35
Pain......................................................................................................................................................35
Why there is a pain associated with orthodontic treatment..................................................................35
Pain control in orthodontic patients.....................................................................................................36
Bacterial endocarditis..........................................................................................................................36
Cross infection.....................................................................................................................................37
Prevention............................................................................................................................................37
Reuse of orthodontic materials from BOS.............................................................................................37
Radiation................................................................................................................................................38
The causes of excessive exposure to radiation in orthodontics.............................................................38
BOS guidelines for the management of inhaled or ingested foreign bodies.........................................39
Summary of the Royal College of Radiologists Guidelines on recommended radiographic views 2007...............................................................................................................................................................41
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 3
Iatrogenic Effects of Orthodontic Treatment
Definition
Deleterious damage to the individual patient as a result of orthodontic
treatment
The potential hazards of orthodontic treatment are four area of interest:
Elis and Benson 2002.
1. Tissue damage;
a. Intraoral effects
Teeth
• Crowns: decalcification, enamel trauma, Interporoximal stripping
• Roots resorption
• Pulp
Periodontium
• Bone - crestal bone resorption
• Gingivitis
• Periodontitis
Soft tissues
• Direct trauma - mucosal ulceration due to appliances
• Trauma from HG inner bow
• Clumsy instrumentation
• Burns
• Allergy/sensitivity
• Cytotoxicity
b. Extraoral effects
TMJ
TMD
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 4
Soft tissues
HG trauma to skin, eye or even the neck
Burns, Chemical from etchant/SEP or Thermal from overheating handpiece
Allergy, Nickel induced sensitivity associated with HG or Latex
Cytotoxicity
2. Treatment failure;
Incomplete treatment
Relapse
3. Greater predisposition to dental disorders.
Caries
Periodontal
4. Systemic effects
Psychological
Effect on the profile
Risk to airway
Pain
Bacterial endocarditis
Cross-infection
Radiation risks
Inhalation of foreign materials
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 5
Tissue damage
Intra-oral
Hard tissue damages
1. Enamel Damage
Enamel demineralisation
Definition
Enamel demineralisation is the loss of calcified tooth substances due to the
attack by acidic by-products of plaque metabolism that remove the mineral
and give the opaque white appearance. This is ranging from early lesions of
opaque white spots to marked cavitation. Mitchelle 2007. The acid is lactic
acid.
Aetiology
1. The reason is a change in the micro-flora (specially Strepcoccus mutans and
lactobacilli) after fitting the FA
2. The increase in food stagnation by FA with difficulty in maintaining good
OH.
3. O’Reilly and Featherstone (1987) noting that decalcification can occur within
1 month due to prolonged accumulation of plaque next to the bracket base.
Classification
WSL Index of Gorelick et al (1982).
1. Stage 0 (none),
2. Stage 1 is a slight rim,
3. Stage 2 a broad rim
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 6
4. Stage 3 cavitation.
Incidences
1. In one cross-sectional study, 50% of individuals undergoing orthodontics had
a non-developmental enamel opacity, compared with 25% of controls.
Gorelick 1982
2. Banks (2000) showing figures as high as 73%
3. Most commonly occur in lower canine and premolars as well as upper canine
and laterals
4. Fixed – labially, URA - palatally
5. May be influenced by dominant hand brushing i.e. in right handed patient, the
decalcification occurs on right side through less effective cleaning of that site.
Predictors for the development of white spot lesions
1. Interproximal caries,
2. Poor oral hygiene,
3. Diet issue.
4. Long treatment times and poor compliance but there is conflicting evidence
for this with Gorelick et al (1982) finding no relationship between length of
treatment and the number of lesions.
5. Negative correlation with age.
Zone of demineralization
1. Outer surface zone
2. Body lesion
3. Dark zone
4. Translucent zone
Complications
1. Aesthetic problems
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 7
2. It has been demonstrated that there is no overall increase in caries incidence
after fitting the fixed appliances, but a shift in distribution. This is seen from
the posterior to anterior teeth and interproximal to smooth surfaces
(Zachrisson & Zachrisson, 1971).
Enamel demineralisation is important to the orthodontist in three ways:
1. Before treatment: Its presence before treatment is a warning sign to the
orthodontist that diet and plaque control need attention or that the patient may
not be suitable for treatment.
2. During treatment: Its occurrence during treatment may necessitate a
shortened treatment plan or immediate discontinuation of treatment.
3. After treatment: Its detection after treatment may necessitate measures to
remineralise the lesion or improve its appearance.
Prevention of demineralization
A. Patient selection and education is essential. Patients with poor oral hygiene
should be excluded.
B. Dietary advice to reduce carbohydrates
C. Oral hygiene - Appropriate oral hygiene instruction and monitoring of
patients (Zachrisson 1974).
Conventional tooth brushing - Mechanical removal of plaque can be carried
out manually by conventional tooth brushing or by the use of electric brushes.
A paper published by Robinson et al 2005, as part of the Cochrane Group,
concluded that only powered toothbrushes with a rotation oscillation action
achieved a reduction in plaque and gingivitis compared to manual tooth
brushing and that this reduction was modest.
Interdental cleaning to ensure optimal dental health (Zachrisson 1974,
Casey 1988). Systematic review has looked at whether using an interspace
toothbrush in addition to a standard toothbrush improves plaque removal.
Unfortunately there were no evidences found (Goh, 2007, Cochrane review)
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 8
D. Periodic referral to hygienist were available to reinforce OH measures. Labial
surfaces of teeth should be inspected each visit and appropriate advice given.
Persistent poor oral hygiene; strongly consider early removal of appliances.
E. Adjunctive procedure including:
1. Xylotol chewing gum help to increase plaque control with no effect on
bonding strength (Isotupa 1995)
2. Chlorhexidine is a highly effective non-specific antimicrobial agent and
remains the most widely used agent in the chemical removal of plaque
(Grossman et al 1989). The disadvantage of chlorhexidine is its taste and
staining.
3. Fluoride mouthrinses
Daily rinsing with a 0.05% sodium fluoride daily mouth rinse or weekly
fluoride rinse of 0.2% has shown to be effective in reduction of white spot
formation.
However it had been noted that patient compliance was very low at 13%
(Geiger et al 1992). The patients most in need of fluoride rinses tend to be the
worst compliers. Cochrane review by Benson in 2013 show the effectiveness
of daily use of 0.05% fluoride but in non-orthodontic patient.
4. Tooth Mousse is a water based creme containing (CPP-ACP: Casein
Phosphopeptide – Amorphous Calcium Phosphate). Bailey 2009 RCT
showed its effectiveness.
5. Fluoride gels & varnishes: other topical applications, such as gels and
varnishes have been used but require patient compliance to be effective.
Professionally applied fluoride gels during treatment can be of benefit, but
are costly and time consuming (O’Rielly & Featherstone 1985). The latest
updated Cochrane review by Benson 2013 confirm the mildest effect of sixth
month application of fluoridated varnish.
6. Fluoride glass bead attached to the AW, but this has not been confirmed
by Benson 2013
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 9
7. Fluoride releasing devices – devices have been developed to release small
amounts of fluoride over a sustained period of time. Marini et al 1999,
designed intra-oral fluoride release devices placed in the upper molar bands
and showed no development of white spots. but this has not been
confirmed by Benson 2013
F. Attachment & appliance design
I. Brackets:
The selection of small brackets aids in reducing the areas of stagnation
Removing excess flash from around the brackets (Artun & Brobakken 1986).
II. Bands:
Placement of bands should ensure complete coverage of the enamel with
cement to prevent the formation of a void and plaque accumulation
(McGuinness 1992).
Periodic checking of the bands
III. Wires:
Minimal use of looped archwires will help to reduce plaque accumulation and
demineralisation (Mitchell 1992).
IV. Cements & adhesives
The use of fluoride containing glass ionomer cements has reduced the
incidence of demineralisation beneath molar bands (Mizrahi 1988, During
1989, Folet et al 2002). Glass ionomer containing fluoride have been shown
to have weaker bond strengths than composite (Cook & Youngson 1988) and
cause a higher number of bracket failures (Norevall et al 1996).
Composite resins containing Fluoride as bonding adhesives have not been
found to effective at reducing white spot formation (Mitchell 1992, Banks et
al 1997).
V. Elastic modules
The evidence demonstrates that fluoride releasing elastomeric modules may
reduce the prevalence of demineralisation (Banks et al 2000).
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 10
However the addition of fluoride to elastics may affect their physical
properties so that they deteriorate rapidly in the mouth. Docherty et al 2002
showed that there was no difference between normal ligatures and fluoride
ligatures.
Treatment of enamel decalcification,
Welbury & Carter, 1993
1. If the decalcification developed while the patient is wearing the
appliance, it is recommended to:
A. Reinforce OHI
B. Fluoride mouth wash
C. Removal of archwires for a visit to allow remineralisation
D. Remove appliance as last resort.
2. After removing the appliance
E. The WSL can resolve to certain extent spontaneously. Artun 1986 found that
50% will resolve spontaneously within six month after debonding.
F. Topical fluoride in the form of gels, varnishes, toothpaste and mouthwashes
are effective in the treatment of demineralisation. Ogaard, 1989 suggests that
this will remineralise the outer layers of the lesion too early, leaving the deep
layers hypomineralised and hence the lesion remains white. Instead a no
fluoride or a low fluoride mouthrinse is recommended to allow
remineralisations from the base of the lesion (Linton, 1996)
G. Tooth Mousse is a water based creme containing (CPP-ACP: Casein
Phosphopeptide – Amorphous Calcium Phosphate). Bailey 2009 RCT
showed its effectiveness.
H. Microabrasion, a technique developed by Croll & Cavanaugh 1986,
involves the use of 18% hydrochloric acid mixed as slurry with pumice, is
rubbed over the affected lesion and removes the surface layer of enamel.
This results in an overall improvement of the lesion (Welbury & Carter
1993).Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 11
I. Restorative intervention if frank cavitation
Enamel Fractures
McGuinnes 1992, Zachrisson et al 1980
Aetiology
1. Abrasion by ceramic bracket
2. Abrasion of the upper canine during retraction of lower canine when OB is
not complete reduced.
3. During debonding: small cracks in the enamel surface are seen following
removal of orthodontic brackets by bur or due to mini-fracture of the enamel
or the tooth restoration. There were appreciably more cracks with chemically
bonded ceramic brackets.
Prevalence
2% more than control
Prevention
1. Careful bracket positioning
2. Do not place ceramic brackets on lower incisors in cases with
increased/normal OB
3. Removal of lower canine brackets during canine retraction if necessary
4. Careful debonding, particularly when working on 'risk' teeth e.g. heavily
restored teeth, hypoplastic teeth.
5. Use tungsten carbide burs in slow handpiece to remove composite
6. Care when debonding ceramic brackets Bishara et al., 1990
Use of the modern ceramic bracket that has a feature of bond failure in
debonding.
Remove composite around bases before debonding to allow full seating of the
debonding pliers
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 12
Use specially designed debonding pliers
Co2 lasers for debonding
Electrothermal debonders can be used
Ultrasonic devices
Interproximally stripped enamel
1. Some claim that it will be carious later but the six years follow up study by
Jarjoura 2006 disagree with this.
2. Some claim it cause reduction in the interseptal bone and deepening in the
PD pocket. (Artun, 1987)
Peridodontium problems
Bollen 2008 systematic review show that there is a negative statistic effect
but not clinical from orthodontic treatment on alveolar bone loss, pocket and
gingival recession
Types
1. Gingivitis
2. Gingival recession
3. Gingival hyperplasia
4. ANUG
5. Periodontitis
6. Burns
7. Alveolar bone loss
Periodontal problems are important to the orthodontist
1. Poor gingival health before treatment means that the patient is unsuitable for
treatment unless they can improve and maintain good plaque control.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 13
2. Special consideration needs to be given to the mechanics when periodontal
support is reduced
3. Its occurrence during treatment may necessitate a shortened treatment plan or
immediate discontinuation of treatment.
4. Sometimes orthodontic intervention is indicated because of periodontal
problems e.g. a lower incisor in crossbite may have attachment loss or
treatment because of periodontal drift
Incidence
1. Nearly all FA patients will get gingivitis.
2. Rarely progresses to attachment loss
3. No difference in periodontal status between post orthodontic and non-
orthodontic patients
4. MH: Patients with certain medical conditions are more at risk of periodontal
problems for example poorly controlled diabetics or epileptics whose
anticonvulsants cause gingival hyperplasia
Prevention
A. Patient selection — good OH and motivated
B. Ensure no active periodontal disease prior to treatment
C. Mechanics
Bonds are better than bands
Certain treatment mechanics e.g. proclination of lower incisors in a Class III
case prior to surgery can result in gingival defects. Management in these
cases should be coordinated with a periodontologist, who may recommend
improved plaque control alone or a free gingival graft.
D. Adjunct to treatment
Physical
1. Oral Hygiene Motivation Method (OHMM)
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 14
2. Electric toothbrush
3. Professional prophylactic programmes
Chemical
1. 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate
2. 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate usually recommended
Screening
1. No Pre-existing periodontal disease needs
BPE probing 3 monthly
Full chart if greater than score 3 in more than one sextant
2. Pre-existing periodontal disease , Orthodontic treatment is not
contraindicated in this group, but certain precaution should be followed:
• The patient is sufficiently motivated
• Disease is controlled
• Three-monthly periodontal checks and routine scaling and polishing
• Keeping the forces light
• Bone loss alters position of centre of resistance of teeth and force required to
achieve movement
• Permanent retention
Gingival recession
Etiology, Johal 2013
1. Plaque,
2. Thin marginal gingivae.
3. Alveolar plate is thin.
4. Position of the tooth,
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 15
5. Vigorous tooth brushing,
6. Traumatic occlusion,
7. Prominent fraenum
8. Orthodontic movement to position the tooth labially
Treatment
1. Thorough instructions on plaque control should be provided.
2. Correct method of brushing
3. Correct cross bite
4. Correct tooth position AP: The gingiva is attached to the supracrestal portion
of the root so that lingual movement of the incisor will result in a labial
increase in gingival height.
5. Frenectomy
6. Surgical intervention with the aim is to increase the thickness of the covering
gingiva by using for example a free gingival graft, and not the apical-coronal
width.
ANUG
Sign and symptoms
Pain
Halitosis
Bleeding
Loss of papillae
Ulceration
Lymphadenitis
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 16
Malaise
Treatment
1. OHI
2. Chlorhexidine mouthwash
3. Local debridement
4. Metronidazole tds 200 mg 3 days
5. Review 1 week
6. At review, if the lesion has failed to resolve then advise the use of
miconazole nitrate 2% gel applied topically four times a day for 2 weeks;
7. If the lesion still fails to resolve then request haematological and
sensitivity test. Alternatively the patient could be referred to a local oral
surgery or oral medicine consultant;
8. Finally, if the lesions are recalcitrant, painful and causing distress then
removal of fixed orthodontic appliances may be necessary.
Alveolar bone loss
Incidence
1. Uncommon Kennedy et al., 1983;
2. 10% of orthodontic patients had significant attachment loss (1- 2mm)
compared with controls, but 50% had no loss, mean loss of attachment
0.1mm compared with controls , Zachrisson, 1976
3. Bone loss during treatment unrelated to previous bone loss.
4. Long term bonded retainer as that teeth at high risk of relapse (Shapira 1994,
BOS 2013)
Root Damage OIIRR
History
First discussed by Bates, 1856
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 17
Definition
It is an inflammatory process that results in a loss of substance from
mineralized cementum and dentine and it considered as a transient
external inflammatory root resorption.
It can be occur in 3-4 week and take 6week to be identifiable
radiographically.
Location of OIIRR
1. Apical or Lateral - difficult to detect lateral resorption on R/G's which
subdivided into:
A. Cemental or surface resorption with remodelling.
B. Deep dentinal resorption with repair. The resorbed cementum and the outer
layers of the dentine are repaired with cementum material which may or may
not restore the root to its original size and shape.
2. Circumferential apical root resorption. Significant resorption of the root
apex results in root shortening with no evidence of regeneration.
Mineral content & physical properties of cementum
Rex et al (2005)
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 18
1. Mineral
content
There was no difference in calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P)
and fluoride (F) concentrations between the buccal and
lingual surfaces of the root
There was a decreasing concentration gradient for Ca, P
and F from cervical to apical third
There is an increasing concentration gradient for Ca and
P from the outer to the inner layer of the root at the
cervical and middle thirds of the root
2. Elastic
modulus
Cementum has a lower elastic modulus than dentine to
cope with movement of the root during function.
The hardness and elastic modulus of cementum decreases
steadily from cervical to apical third.
The average hardness of cementum in the middle third of
the root
Prevalence
Usually apical rather than lateral (unless using RME), Kenndey 1983
The teeth susceptible to root resorption include the upper and lower incisors
and the lower first molars (Kennedy et al 1983), this is because of their
morphology and because most of the movement involved these teeth.
Minimal OIIRR
1. Very WIDE Variation. !!!! (Why do the figures for reported incidence vary
so much? Some report number of patients with resorption, whilst others
report number of teeth. Some methods of detecting resorption are more
sensitive than others i.e. CT v periapical radiographs
Mild: 90% of patient Weltman 2010.
Moderate: 2-4mm 6-13% (Linge and Linge 1983)
Severe more than 4mm: 5% in adult and 2% in adolescent (Linge
and Linge 1983)
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 19
OIIRR tends to occur commonly in the apical region because
1. The fulcrum of most tooth movement is usually at the apical half of the
root, so the force is concentrated at this area.
2. The orientation of the periodontal fibres at the apical end is different,
which increases the stress in the region ,
3. The apical third of the root is covered by cellular cementum
4. The apical third of the root has different mineral contents with different
physical properties than other parts of the root.
Patho-physiology of OIIRR
Three mechanisms or theories.
1. Usually when the force applied to the tooth, the bone and the cementum will
resorb. But the cementum will be repaired again during recovery period
between activation visits. If the cementoblastic activity is low, the cementum
will not be repaired (Berezniak 2002)
2. Mechanical damage to the natural barriers of resorption (the cementoid layer
and the more mature periodontal collagen fibres). Once this have been lost
this leaves the cementum exposed to osteoclast , Once resorption of the
cementum has occurred then the underlying dentine can be destroyed which
is irreversible. Kindealn 2008.
3. Possible increase in the osteoclastic and cementoclastic activity.
Diagnosis of OIIRR
1. History
2. Clinical examination
3. Radiographical examinations:
DPT (overestimate resorption by 20% compared to PA one,
Sameshima and Sinclair 2001) this is because the apices being outside
the focal trough and thus seemingly resorbed. Also DPT not clear
because of the narrow focal trough at the anterior area. Another
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 20
problem: The shape of the curved focal trough is pre-determined and
patients have to be positioned carefully within the machine to ensure
that their teeth and the supporting structures appear in focus on the
resultant film. Incorrect positioning results in a distorted image with
teeth appearing foreshortened, magnified and/or out of focus
depending on the positioning error. In addition, normal anatomical
structures can appear as radiolucent or radiopaque shadows
superimposed over the teeth as either real or actual shadows or as
ghost or artefactual shadows all of which can degrade the quality of
the final image.In orthodontic patients, another common problem is
one of skeletal base discrepancy. In markedly class II or class III
cases, it may not be possible to position both the upper and lower
labial segment teeth within the focal trough of the machine
simultaneously (Leach and Ireland 2001)
PA (the paralleling technique and the bisected angle technique. The first is
better Ireland 2001). PA is not accurate in quantifying the amount of
resorption (Katona 2006) Ferguson 1992
Occlusal radiographs may be needed to supplement the DPT. Issacson 2008.
the upper standard occlusal radiograph is in effect a large bisected angle
technique periapical and so it is less reproducible
Lateral ceph can be used for upper incisor but it carries 5-12% magnification
(Chan and Darenedliler 2004) and superimposition is problematic (Leach and
Ireland 2001)
CT or CBCT
Digital radiography is a relatively recent development in dentistry enabling
the film packet to be replaced with a digital image receptor. Two types of
receptors have been developed – CCD (charge coupled device) sensors and
photo-stimulable phosphor imaging plates. Both systems have intraoral
receptors suitable for periapical radiography but only photo-stimulable
phosphor plates have been produced for occlusal radiography. Digital
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 21
radiography has been shown to demonstrate a similar degree of sensitivity to
film-based radiography in the detection of resorption, but with a lower
radiation dose (Borg 1998)
Classification of root resorption
Types of resorptionBrezniak & Wasserstein, 1993
1. Physiological - resorption of deciduous teeth
2. Inflammatory due to orthodontic treatment
3. Replacement - Ankylosis
4. Idiopathic - no identifiable cause
Classification according to the degree of resorption.Levander and Malmgren (1988) classification
It is a commonly used contemporary classification which divides apical
root resorption into five categories.
1. grade 0 no resorption
2. grade 1 indicates an irregular root outline (blunting)
3. grade 2, 0-2 mm root resorption (minor)
4. grade 3, > 2-4 mm (moderate)
5. grade 4, resorption > one third of root length or more than 4mm (extreme)
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 22
Important to the orthodontist in three ways
1. It can be detected prior to treatment and therefore affect the treatment plan.
The most commonly resorbed tooth detected prior to treatment is the upper
lateral incisor, which may have been resorbed by an impacted canine tooth in
48% of cases as detected by medical CT scan (Ericson & Kurol 2001). A
study about the influence of detecting OIIRR on TP: In 2006, Bjerklin
and Ericson analysed the treatment outcome and treatment planning before
and after a computerized tomography investigation of children with retained
and ectopically positioned maxillary canines and some degree of root
resorption. The diagnosis and a treatment plan were originally based on
extraoral and intraoral photographs, study models, the patient’s history,
conventional radiography, and, if available, lateral head films. Approximately
one year later, the same examiner drew up a new treatment plan based on the
same records but with a supplemental CT examination. The treatment plans
of 35 (43.7%) of the 80 children were modified to reflect this new
information. Of those patients with root resorption on the incisors adjacent to
retained canines, more than half of the treatment plans were altered. A CT
investigation of root resorption can therefore be an important source of
information for treatment planning for children with retained or ectopically
erupting maxillary canines.
2. It can be detected during treatment and therefore alters the treatment
mechanics.
3. It can be detected after treatment and worries the orthodontist about what
they have done.
Factors that influence the severity of orthodontically induced
inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR)
Brinzniazk 1991, 2002
There are biological and mechanical factors that influence the severity of
orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR).
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 23
1. Biological factors
a. Race
b. Gender
c. Age factors
Chronological age
Dental age
d. Genetic factors
e. Medical and social factors
Asthma and allergy
Endocrine and hormone imbalance
Nutrition
Drugs
Alcohol consumption
f. Local factors
Types of malocclusion
Hypodontia
Habits
Occlusal trauma
Traumatised teeth
Pre-existing root resorption
Endodontically treated teeth
Transplanted teeth
Hypo-functional periodontium
Specific tooth vulnerability
Abnormal root morphology
2. Mechanical factors
Duration of treatment
Distance of movement
Magnitude of forceMohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 24
Duration of force
Direction of force
Treatment mechanics
In details
1. Biological factors
a. Genetic factors
b. Race - Hispanic>White>Asian
b. Medical and social factors
Asthma and allergy: This could be attributed to the close proximity of the
roots to the inflamed maxillary sinus and or the presence of inflammatory
mediators in these patients
Nutrition: deficiency of dietary calcium and vitamin D
Endocrine and hormone imbalance: hyperparathyroidism , Paget’s disease
and hypophosphatemia are hypothesized to be related to OIIRR . An excess
of thyroid hormones which increased bone turnover were found to reduce
root resorption during orthodontic tooth displacement in a rat model.
Drugs: Inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase and the subsequent inhibition of the
production of prostaglandins with (NSAIDs) can be useful in decreasing bone
and root resorption. Bisphosphonates directly or indirectly induce apoptosis
in osteoclasts which play a role in the inhibition of bone resorption.
Alcohol consumption: The presence of ethanol in the circulation inhibits
the hydroxylation of vitamin D3 in the liver, thus hindering calcium
homeostasis and resulting in a rise in parathyroid hormone (PTH). PTH in
turn enhances the resorption of mineralized tissues including tooth roots.
c. Genetic
There is a responsabile gene called IL-1A & IL-1B (Al-Qawasimi 2003)
d. GenderMohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 25
Some studies have suggested that orthodontically treated females had a
greater incidence of OIIRR than males. (3.7:1)
Few studies have shown the opposite
However, most of the studies have found no correlation between gender
and the extent.
d. Age factors
Chronological age: The periodontal membrane becomes aplastic, narrow and
less vascular with age causing more OIIRR.
Dental age: Partially formed roots have been found to develop normally
during orthodontic treatment and it has been suggested that teeth with open
apices may be less susceptible to OIIRR. (Harris and Baker 1990).
e. Local factors
Habits: bruxism, nail-biting associated with more OIIRR
History of trauma: associated with more OIIRR.
Hypofunctional periodontium: associated with more OIIRR.
Teeth with pre-existing root resorption: these teeth are very much more
susceptible to root resorption as indicated by Massler and Malone (1952),
Goldson and Henrikson (1975) and Linge and Linge (1983). As a rough
guide, the rate of root resorption seems to double on teeth with pre-existing
root resorption.
Transplanted teeth: Transplanted teeth are no more susceptible to OIIRR
than normal teeth provided the transplant is without complication and the
orthodontist waits three months before attempting tooth movement (Paulsen
et al 1995).
Traumatised teeth may undergo EARR as a consequence of their trauma
even if they do not undergo orthodontic treatment; if this is the case, then
these teeth behave in the same way as teeth with pre-existing root resorption.
Traumatised teeth that do not exhibit root resorption prior to orthodontic
treatment behave normally.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 26
Endodontically treated teeth : In general, it is felt that endodontically
treated teeth are less susceptible to root resorption than normal teeth and this
is substantiated by Remington et al (1989), Owman-Moll et al (1995) and
Costopoulos and Nanda (1996).
Occlusal trauma: due to jiggling effects associated with more OIIRR.
Specific tooth vulnerability to root resorption: The teeth most frequently
affected by OIIRR according to severity are the maxillary lateral incisors,
maxillary central incisors, mandibular incisors, distal root of mandibular first
molar, mandibular second premolars and maxillary second premolars .
Abnormal root morphology: (Kindelan 2008)
i. Blunt
ii. Pipette-shaped roots
iii. Single rooted teeth
iv. Narrow and thin roots.
v. diminutive laterals are not more susceptible,
However, Lee et al 1999 showed that there is no correlation. The latest study by
Mirabella and Artun 1995 showed that long teeth suffer more resorption and
this because they require more force to be moved than shorter.
Types of malocclusion:
i. treatment of ectopic canines, may get more resorption of 2 and 4, this may be
due to
• Pre-existing resorption not detected before treatment
• Due to the increased treatment times associated with these cases
• Due to intrusive force when the canine is extruded.
ii. hypodontia — teeth moved more distances and have small or narrow pipette
roots
iii. no risk factors related to increased OJ and OB
Mechanical factors (Weltman 2010)Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 27
1. Duration of orthodontic treatment: more OIIRR in longer duration
2. Magnitude of applied force: more OIIRR with high force
3. Direction of force: more OIIRR in intrusive force
4. Amount of apical tooth movement : more OIIRR in long movement
5. Treatment mechanics: more OIIRR with:
• FA type (Begg more the SWA)
• Superelastic archwires
• Rectangular AWs
• Intermaxillary traction appliance due to jiggling force.
• Cortical bone contact with root apices
• HG and J hook
• Orthognathic decompensation
Repair and clinical consequences of OIIRR
1. Repair of root resorption begins when the applied orthodontic force is
discontinued or reduced below a certain level and within a week (20–26
g/cm) Schwarz
2. Many studies have demonstrated that the resorptive defects were repaired by
deposition of new cementum and establishment of new PDL.
3. However, the original root contours and lengths were never re-established.
4. Severely resorbed teeth were found to be functioning in a reasonable manner.
5. The worst outcome was hypermobility
Prevention and management of OIIRR
Ghafari 1994 and Brezniak, 2002 recommendations include
A. Before treatment
All the risk factors should be considered:
1. General considerations. The patient/parents must be informed about the risk
of OIIRR as a consequence of orthodontic treatment.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 28
2. Thorough assessment of familial tendency and medical history.
3. Habit control
4. Consideration of the Age. Treatment of moderate to severe malocclusions is
commenced when most of the incisors had open apices, which is before the
age of 9 years.
5. Consideration of the malocclusion associated risk.
6. Root-filled teeth are not necessarily at greater risk of root resorption and may
safely be moved using orthodontic appliances, providing:
Teeth are clinically symptomless and radiographically satisfactory;
It is 6 months after a new root filling;
A radiograph is taken 6 months after the start of active treatment.
B. Treatment of choice
There is no specific appliance that makes resorption less
C. During treatment
If resorption occurs during treatment, then follow these
recommendations:
1. The force levels should be modified or a 2–3 months’ pause in treatment with
passive archwires should be implemented (Levander 1994).
2. Then take a radiograph,
A. if the resorption continue then try to modify the treatment,
B. if the resorption stopped then continue but the mechanical risk factors:
Levander 1999, Brezniak 2002)
Decreased treatment duration,
Longer intervals between activations
Limiting tooth movement for OIIRR-prone teeth, e.g. Intrusion and torque ,
The use of light intermittent forces and avoidance of sustained jiggling
intermaxillary elastics ,
Consider IDS instead of extraction
Consider early fixation
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 29
D. After treatment
Final records including radiographs are recommended and are even
mandatory. If OIIRR is present on the final radiographs, then
1. the patient/parents should be informed
2. For teeth with severe resorption, follow-up radiographic examinations are
recommended until OIIRR is no longer progressive and repaired.
3. Flexible bonded retainer that allow physiological functional of the
periodontium is recommended as that teeth at high risk of relapse (Shapira
1994, BOS 2013)
4. The use of teeth with severe resorption as abutment teeth should be
reconsidered. Each 3mm of root resorption is equivalent to 1mm of alveolar
bone loss regarding the tooth support (Kalkwarf 1986).
5. In cases of extreme resorption, endodontic treatment may be considered as
well using CaOH
6. Occlusal trauma might lead to further OIIRR, this should be considered and
the occlusion might be relieved.
7. Long term prognosis even in sever resorption is quite good (Levander and
Malmgren 2000).
NB: Ahangari 2010 Cochrne review (they talked about root resorption in
general not specifically in orthodontic) Our explicit search revealed that despite
the relatively high prevalence of this defect, treatment options are generally
case-dependant and there is no high level evidence in this respect. It appears
that the clinician's experience in conjunction with patient's preference would
make up the most suitable therapeutic approach.
Pulp damage
Incidence
1. Pulpitis - 90% get transient pain in the first month
2. Rarely leads to loss of vitalityMohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 30
Aetiology
1. In previously traumatised teeth because trauma causes degenerative change in
the pulp making it unable to sustain orthodontic forces
2. Composite polishing burs/stones
3. Electrothermal debonders - significant hyperaemia
Prevention and managements
Prevention includes:
1. Care when treating previously traumatised/RCT teeth
2. Care needed not to overheat teeth when removing composite at debond
3. Care when using electrothermal debonders,
If loss of vitality developed then:
1. Analgesic like ibuprofen or paracetamol to relief pain.
2. Monitor baseline vitality and repeat 3 mthly. Atack (1999)
3. Use light forces
4. If the tooth develops pulpitis, a pause of treatment for 3 weeks is indicated.
(Bergius, 2002)
Soft-tissue damage
They can be damaged in two ways:
1. Direct damage by removable or fixed components
A. Intra-oral tissues:
Aetiology
1. Mechanical ulceration from
Brackets,
Distal ends,
Long spans,
Displacement of HG whisker
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 31
Clumsy instrumentation
2. Chemical bum from etch/SEP
3. Thermal burn — hot instrument, electrothermal debonder
4. Inflammation under the Nance with loss of bone attachment has been
recorded (Singh 2009)
Prevention
1. Turn in hooks
2. Trim or turn in long ends
3. Careful operating
4. Use stopper to prevent wire sliding
5. Bumper sleeving on long spans of archwires, lacebacks
6. Safety straps on HG to keep whisker within HG tube
7. Use of wax as necessary with addition of benzocaine to relive pain
8. Chlorohexidine to reliefe pain of ulceration
B. extra-oral soft tissues:
1. HG induced
A. Eyes: ulcer or opthalmitis
B. Skin
Injuries associated with displacement of HG whisker Samuel & Jones, 1994
Bruising associated from neck strap
Prevention
1. Safety eyeglass during fitting and adjustments
2. Careful adjustments of HG to maintain good fit - not too tight/loose
3. Safety products e.g. NiTom locking facebow, straps,blunt-ended
whiskers, snap release HG
4. Clear instructions given to patient/parents regarding wear and care of HG
(written and verbal)
5. Advise not to play in HG
6. Any problems to discontinue wear and contact orthodontistMohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 32
7. Advice to seek ophthalmic opinion if trauma occurs involving the eye,
however small
2. extra oral burns
Chemical - etchant/SEP
• Physical
3. Infections like
A. Angular cheilitis (Short and Cross 2008)
Angular cheilitis is a multi-factorial disease of infectious origin. Clinically it
is characterized as an eroded and erythematous non-vesicular lesion radiating
from the angle of the mouth which may be unilateral or bilateral in
presentation.
It caused by Candida, Streptococci and Staphylococci,
Predisposing factors
I. Microbiological changes,
II. Haematological deficiencies
III. Loss of vertical dimension in the elderly
IV. Immunocompromised individuals
V. Healthy patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
B. Other record a case of parotitis associated with trauma of the Stenson
duct by FA (Mccarthy 2012)
2. Indirect damage by allergic reactions to nickel and latex
Latex Allergy
Prevalence
1% of population
Individuals susceptible to allergic reactions include
1. Healthcare professional
2. Latex industry worker
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 33
3. Patient with multiple previous operation
4. Patient hypersensitive to certain food
5. Individuals with allergic rhinitis, Asthma and eczema;
6. Atopic patient
7. Patients with atypical spina bifida.
How Should Potential Orthodontic Patients with Suspected Latex Allergy
Be Managed?
1. Definitive diagnosis:
Latex allergy can be diagnosed with either
Patch testing
Pin prick testing,
Blood test
2. Appointment and surgery management:
Appointments should be scheduled for the early morning with use of a latex-
screened area to segregate latex-free products to avoid contamination.
3. Appliance design and handling
Latex-free gloves including vinyl.
The use of elastomeric ties could be avoided with use of self-ligating
brackets.
Space closure should be undertaken with nickel– titanium coils.
Where inter-maxillary elastics are required, latex-free elastics can be used,
although they are subject to greater force degradation.
4. Staff training
Staff should be aware of emergency protocols for dealing with anaphylactic
reactions and auxiliary staff should be aware of the diagnosis.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 34
Nickel hypersensitivity
Introduction
Nickel is found in arch wires, bands, brackets and headgear, with
stainless steel containing nickel in the ratio of 18:8, with 8 referring to the
level of nickel.
Delayed (Type IV those related to nickel or latex are typically Type IV
reactions.
It mainly released in the first week after bonding.
Sign and symptom
1. For the gingivae:
Gingivitis in the absence of plaque
Gingival hyperplasia
2. For the tongue:
Burning sensation in the mouth
Metallic taste
Numbness/tingling sensation
Soreness of the side of the tongue
3. For the lip:
Labial swelling
Angular cheilitis
Labial desquamation
4. Extra-oral signs and symptoms can include localised dermatitis in sites of
prolonged skin contact with nickel-containing objects, for example, headgear
studs. This can present as a maculopapular skin rash or vasculitis-like skin
lesions.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 35
Prevalence
1. Nickel hypersensitivity affects around 30% of the population (Nickel
allergy is more common in girls (30%) than in boys (3%) and in
adolescents with pierced ears (31%) than those without ear piercing (2%)
(Bass et al., 1993) . 10 % in female and 3% in male (Nelsen and Menn
1993).
2. It has been suggested that a threshold concentration of approximately 30
ppm of nickel may be sufficient to elicit a cytotoxic response.(O’Rahilly
2003)
3. More serious if contact the skin than mucosa, 5 - 12 times the
concentration of nickel required to provoke mucosal lesions compared
with skin lesions
Treatment
1. Definitive diagnosis:
Patch testing by using a cutaneous sensitivity (patch) test of 5% nickel
sulphate in a petroleum jelly substrate
Pin prick testing,
Blood test (immunoassay)
2. Appliance design and handling
Consideration could be given to use of nickel-free brackets, e.g. ceramic,
gold, titanium or polycarbonate brackets.
The use of nickel– titanium archwires should be avoided where intra-oral
signs of a reaction are noted. These wires may be replaced by fibre-reinforced
composite wires, stainless steel wires with reduced nickel content, titanium
molybdenum alloy or titanium niobium wires.
Rarely, in severe cases, consideration could be given to the use of clear
plastic aligners.
Remove appliance
3. Staff training
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 36
Staff should be aware of emergency protocols for dealing with anaphylactic
reactions and auxiliary staff should be aware of the diagnosis.
Cytotoxicity
1. Allergic reactions are composite and acrylic.
2. No-mix adhesives are more toxic than two-paste adhesives.
Treatment failure
It includes:
1. Failure to complete a course of orthodontic treatment
Common (4–23%)
Treatment may fail through:
A. Patient non-complianceIncorrect diagnosis
B. Incorrect management.
2. Relapse
Increasing predisposition to other disorders
1. Temporomandibular : it is better to Record signs and symptoms before
treatment; advise patients seeking joint disorder treatment for such
disorder that there may not be an improvement with orthodontics
2. Periodontal problem: no evidence
3. Psychological – teasing if the treatment was not appropriate
4. Risk to airway: like mandibular set back in short throat cases,
5. Effect on the profile:
The effect of extractions on the facial profile has remained a controversial
issue.
Paquette 1992, 4 extraction has an effect but not significant,
Johnston 93 showed that 4 extractions don’t flatten the face).
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 37
However the above evidences are applied on an average patient and are
should be taken in flat or retrusive profile.
Systemic effects
Pain
Why there is a pain associated with orthodontic treatment
1. Orthodontic pain arises from ischemia, inflammation, and edema in the
compressed periodontal ligament.
2. In an inflamed and ischemic periodontal ligament, mediators such as
histamine, bradykinin, prostaglandins, serotonin, and substance P are
released.
3. These mediators irritate the nerve ends of the pain receptors, thus causing
pain.
4. Orthodontic pain usually begins at 2 hours after force application and reaches
its maximum intensity at bed-time or at 24 hours,
5. It lasts approximately 5 to 7 days.
Pain control in orthodontic patients
1. Paracetamol
2. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Ashley 2012 in a
Cochrane review could not determine whether or not painkillers before
treatment are of benefit in pediatric and orthodontic separator placement
3. Low-level laser therapy,
4. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation,
5. Vibratory stimulation of the periodontal ligament,
6. Chewing gum or biting on a wafer. The mechanism of these methods that
the chewing on the teeth help in restoring the normal vascular and
lymphatic circulation of the periodontal ligament, thus preventing or Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 38
relieving inflammation and oedema, and finally relieving pain and
discomfort. Farzanegan 2012.
Bacterial endocarditis
A. Chorhexidine CHX mouthwash should not be given as this has not been
proved to be effective
B. New guidelines advise that antibiotic prophylaxis (ABC) should not be
given to children and adults with structural cardiac defects undergoing
dental intervention procedures. Reasons for changes
1. Regular tooth brushing presents greater risk of IE than a single dental
procedure
2. No consistent association between having dental procedures and Infective
Endocarditis (1E)
3. Clinical effectiveness of antibiotic cover (ABC) not proven
4. Antibiotic cover may cause more deaths through fatal anaphylaxis than
no ABC
5. ABC is not cost effective
C. Advice to patients
Patients should be given clear and consistent information including:
1. Why ABC no longer used
2. Benefits and risks of ABC
3. The importance of maintaining good oral health
4. Information about symptoms of IE and when to seek help
Cross infection
Types
1. Patient to patient
2. Patient to operator
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 39
3. Operator to patient
4. Any source to 3rd party
Prevention
1. Medical history
2. Use cross-infection control measures, e.g. safety spectacles, gloves, face-
masks
3. Proper sterilisation/disinfection procedures
4. Hepatitis B vaccination
5. Ultrasonic cleaning of tried-in bands reduces but does not completely
eliminate salivary proteins, there is a need to investigate a more effective
method of cleaning, Benson & Douglas,2007
Reuse of orthodontic materials from BOS
The reuse of orthodontic materials involves several possible problems:
1. Patient’s attitude
Patients and parents may be unhappy at the thought that the appliance in
question is “second-hand”
2. Device performance
It is conceivable that the performance of a particular component may be
affected by reuse. For instance, the mechanical behaviour of a superelastic
archwire could be different
3. Cross-infection control
in the case of bands that have been tried in for size but not actually used, it
was thought that the lumen of any attached tubes might not be adequately
sterilised by autoclaving. Recent evidence suggests that this concern is
unfounded and that previously tried in bands can be adequately sterilised
using a bench top autoclave1.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 40
Radiation
X-ray radiation can damages tissue either directly (stochastic) or to the
genetic tissues.
While the risks are low, with Ireland and McDonald (2003) quoting
figures of 1.8 deaths for every 1 million OPT radiographs taken, it is
essential that this risk is taken into account when taking such films.
The causes of excessive exposure to radiation in orthodontics
Isaacson & Thom, 2001
1. Wrong diagnosis
2. Inappropriate justification
3. Inappropriate radiographs choice.
4. Faulty x-ray set.
5. Wrong speed film.
6. Lack of beam collimation.
7. Problem with processing
BOS guidelines for the management of inhaled or ingested foreign bodies
The operator should obviously take all necessary precautions to prevent
such accidents from occurring.
However, the following guidelines are written to help formulate an action
plan when a patient presents with an inhalation/ingestion episode.
1. Is the object still visible in the mouth or entrance to the oropharynx? If it
is, attempts should be made to remove it by appropriate means, with the
patient reclined. Failing this, the patient should be encouraged to cough
up the object.
2. What has been inhaled or ingested? Is it a bracket, band, archwire or
auxiliary? It is important to know its size, shape, likely flexibility and
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 41
radio-opacity. This will not only aid localisation of the object but will
help predict the likely outcome of the incident.
3. How long ago did the episode take place? Was it minutes, hours, days, or
weeks ago? In the absence of any signs or symptoms, then the longer it
has been since the incident the less likely it is the patient will need to be
referred for advice and an x-ray. Late presentation can cause a persistent
cough.
4. If the object is not visible, does the patient have any signs or symptoms
indicating where it is?
A. Inhalation
This may lead to respiratory obstruction and present as coughing, choking
or inspiratory stridor.
It is important to maintain or re-establish the airway.
The patient should remain in the reclined position, and be encouraged to
cough up the object.
If this is not successful and the symptoms persist, immediately summon
help and call for an ambulance.
Fortunately most fixed appliance components are sufficiently small that
upper respiratory tract obstruction is unlikely.
However, an aspirated component, if not coughed up, may pass through
the trachea and into a bronchus.
In such instances it is important the patient is immediately sent to the
local hospital for advice, where they will probably have a chest x-ray in
order to confirm the presence and location of the object.
It will then need to be removed using bronchoscopy. If the object is likely
to be radiolucent, this information must also be provided to the hospital.
B. Ingestion
Following ingestion of an object, the patient may not present with any
immediate signs or symptoms.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 42
However, if it becomes lodged in the oesophagus, it may cause pain or
vomiting and its presence will need to be confirmed.
The patient should be sent to the local hospital for advice and a chest x-
ray.
The object will then need to be removed using fibre-optic endoscopy as a
matter of urgency.
If a foreign body reaches the stomach, it is likely that it will eventually
pass through the gastrointestinal tract.
Management of an ingested foreign body, which is asymptomatic and has
reached the stomach, entails informing the patient of the event, as well as
explaining the likely signs and symptoms should the object not
subsequently pass through the gut. The signs and symptoms include pain
and vomiting.
The risk of perforation or obstruction from the stomach onwards is
related to the size, shape and likely flexibility of the foreign body. If
greater than 5cm in length, it is unlikely to pass through the duodenum.
If it passes the duodenum, the next most likely site of obstruction is the
ileocaecal valve. In any case, obstruction can lead to perforation and
subsequent infection.
Ideally, the stools should be checked by the patient to see if the object has
been passed.
The patient should be referred to the local hospital for advice if the object
is not noted to pass the gut after 6 days.
However, some objects such as orthodontic brackets are very small and
relatively smooth and may well pass through the gut unnoticed, even if
the stools are checked.
If it is certain that the object was ingested and not inhaled, then a follow-
up referral and x-ray is not always required.
5. When should I send the patient to the local hospital?
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 43
Referral to the local hospital in each and every case would not only be
impractical, but would lead to patients being exposed to unnecessary radiation
with its associated risks.
However, if you suspect an object may have been inhaled, or it is larger than
5cm in length and has been swallowed, then you should refer the patient to the
Radiology or Accident and Emergency Department of your local hospital for
advice.
Summary of the Royal College of Radiologists Guidelines on recommended
radiographic views 2007
1. Suspected inhalation then chest x-ray.
2. Suspected to be in the pharynx or upper oesophagus then chest x-ray
indicated.
3. If the foreign body is not passed within 6 days then an abdominal x-ray
maybe indicated.
4. Ingested foreign body is sharp or large - abdominal x-ray is indicated for
localisation. Most swallowed foreign bodies that pass the oesophagus will
pass the remainder of the gastrointestinal tract. A chest x-ray will only be
indicated if the abdominal x-ray is negative.
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 44
Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow, 2013 45
top related