orthodontic materials by almuzian

64
Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012 Orthodontic materials BONDING McCol 1998 found the bracket base surface areas up to 7 mm 2 are adequate for retention of xed ort h odontic appliances. SEP 10mpc bishara 2001 Reynold showed that the clinically required bonding is 6-8mpc Bracket must resist a displacement force of at least 5-15 Kg for clinical success. Modern direct bonding attachments a. a mesh b. particles adhered to the bracket base (spheres, rods or similar) c. grooves or undercuts placed in the surface of the b d. Secondary surface enhancements may be: surface roughening flame spray coating of particles on the primary retention surface or deposition of a chemically activatable material (such as Silicon oxide) on the primary retention surface other chemical or electrical etching 1

Upload: mohammed-almuzian

Post on 21-Mar-2017

70 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


15 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Orthodontic materials

BONDING

• McCol 1998 found the bracket base surface areas up to 7 mm2 are adequate for retention of

fixed orthodontic appliances.

• SEP 10mpc bishara 2001

• Reynold showed that the clinically required bonding is 6-8mpc

• Bracket must resist a displacement force of at least 5-15 Kg for clinical success.

Modern direct bonding attachments

a. a mesh

b. particles adhered to the bracket base (spheres, rods or similar)

c. grooves or undercuts placed in the surface of the b

d. Secondary surface enhancements may be:

• surface roughening

• flame spray coating of particles on the primary retention surface or deposition of a

chemically activatable material (such as Silicon oxide) on the primary retention surface

• other chemical or electrical etching

Preparation of the enamel surface for bonding

Surface cleaning

• There is no evidence to provide support for the practice of pumice prophylaxis before etching

in order to obtain adequate bond strength for conventional etching because the aim of using

pumice is to remove the acquired pellicle which would be removed anyway by the etchant

Barry, 1995

• Self-etching primers do require prophylaxis (Burgess et al, 2006)

• Some recommend pre-etching the surface for 5 second with 37% phosphoric acid before

using SEP. Fitzgeland 2011.

Moisture control

1

Page 2: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

• One of the pre-requisites for successful bonding is a dry bonding field. The use of

atropine sulphate (600 mcg tablet over 12 years of age) is one way of reducing salivary flow.

The patient is given a 600 microgram tablet of atropine sulphate to take one hour before

bonding as a TTO drug (to take out) to dry up salivary secretions.

• Contra-indications are: pregnancy, glaucoma, and severe asthma. Wearers of contact

lenses should be asked to remove them and not replace them until the following day.

Children under the age of 12 years are not given atropine.

• There was no statistically significant effect on the observed bond failure rates.

Ponduri et al (2007)

Enamel etching

The use of 37% phosphoric acid with a 30 second etch time has been confirmed as a sensible

routine choice for routine orthodontic bonding (Gardner and Hobson 2001)

With 30%-40% phosphoric acid: 10-30 µm of surface enamel is lost, depth of penetration of

resin tags reaches 50 µm. μm; at debonding, up to 56 μm of enamel may be removed during

the debonding and polishing process

(Bishara 2000).

Because of the enamel loss that occurs when etching enamel with phosphoric acid, some

recommend the use of maleic acid and polyacrylic acid. Polyacrylic acid produces slight

etching of the enamel surface and but in addition, calcium sulphate dihydrate crystals are

formed which bond securely to the enamel surface but 30% lower bond strength than that

achieved with phosphoric acid (Bishara 2000).

An aqueous solution of 10% maleic acid produces an etching pattern that leads to statistically

significantly higher shear bond strengths. McCol 1998

Erickson compared the use of 10% maleic acid to 37% phosphoric acid and reported that the

resulting bond strengths were essentially similar but malic acid produce less penetration of

the enamel.

Bin Abdullah and rock 1996 should that 15 sec is the best

Wang (1991) showed there to be no significant difference in bond strength between etching

for 15, 30, 60 and 90 seconds; etching for longer than 90 seconds resulted in lower bond

strengths.

2

Page 3: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Etching pattern

Silverstone et al. (1975) and Galil, 1979

type 1 etching pattern, prism core material was preferentially removed leaving the prism peripheres relatively intact.

type 2 etching pattern, the reverse pattern was observed. The peripheral regions of prisms were removed preferentially, leaving prism cores remaining relatively unaffected.

type 3 etching pattern, there was a more random pattern, areas of which corresponded to types 1 and 2 damage together with regions in which the pattern of etching could not be related to prism morphology. 

Type 4 no prism removed but only minor roughness superficially Type 5 smooth surface

Sealants

• Sealants are unfilled resins (methyle metha acrylate monomer.

• It is hypothesised that sealants protect etched enamel and increase bond strength because they

form a protective layer over the etched enamel and allow increased penetration of the unfilled

resin into the resin tags respectively.

• But much concern had been raised regarding its toxciogenicity related to Bisphenol A

• Some practitioners advocate precuring the primer but Osterle et al (2004) found no advantage

(or disadvantage) in doing this.

• Some practitioner advocate bonding without the use of resin to reduce the risk of

occupational exposure to liquid resin and its unpolymerized components. In addition, another

advantage of not applying liquid resin is that it saves a step and therefore saves time .

However Bazagani et al 2014 showed that in the resin group, the incidence of retainer failure

was 4% and occurred at the composite-wire interface; in the nonresin group, the incidence

was 27% and occurred at the enamel-composite interface. The incidences of calculus

accumulation and discoloration adjacent to the composite pads were 27% and 69% (P  =  0.03

and P < .001) higher in the nonresin group, respectively.

3

Page 4: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Self-etching primer

Mechanism of action:

The phosphate group on the methacrylated phosphoric acid ester dissolves the

calcium and removes it from the hydroxyapatite.

It is important to do the agitation in order to remove the dissolved calcium and allow

the unused phosphorous ion to be in contact with the enamel surface.

It is important to do gentle air blowing (dispersion) to evaporate the solvent.

However, rather than being rinsed away, the calcium forms a complex with the

phosphate group and is incorporated into the network when the primer polymerizes

(agitation process).

Evidences for the bond strength of SEP

• Aljoubouri 2003, SEP per patient was significantly quicker than with the two-stage system.

There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in the bond failure rate per

patient between the two groups.

• Ireland 2003 show less bond strength of SEP but within clinical uses.

• Bishara 1998, It is of interest to note that there was a tendency to have less residual adhesive

remaining on the tooth when an SEP was used than when phosphoric and maleic acids were

used. This might be of advantage to the clinician because it will require less time to clean the

teeth after debonding.

• Zaher 2012 found that moderate evidence exists that shorter resin tag penetration produces

less change in enamel colour following clean-up and polishing. Since resin impregnation in

the enamel structure cannot be reversed by debonding and cleaning procedures, enamel

colour alteration may occur by direct absorption of food colorants and products arising from

the corrosion of the orthodontic appliance or may be the change in the refractive index of the

region, modifying the diffusely reflected light component. Self-etch primers produce less

resin penetration and these systems may produce less iatrogenic colour change in enamel

following orthodontic treatment

• Fleming, Johal et al. 2012 in their systematic review found that

4

Page 5: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

1. Weak but statistically insignificant evidence suggests that the odds of attachment

failures differ between SEP and AE orthodontic bonding techniques over a minimum period

of 12 months.

2. Use of 1-step bonding techniques is likely to result in a modest time saving compared

with 2-stage techniques.

3. Additional high-quality randomized controlled trials investigating the overall course

of treatment are required to analyze the effect of bonding modality on demineralization

around fixed appliances.

4. In the absence of clear evidence to favor either system, the choice of bonding

modality remains at the discretion of each operator.

• Hu 2013 Cochrane reviw Only five of the studies provided usable evidence for this review

and the combined results did not enable a conclusion to be made about whether or not there is

a difference in bond failure between SEPs and conventional etching. There was also no

usable evidence to suggest whether SEPs or conventional etchants lead to less decay around

the etching site, or are associated with fewer costs or better participant satisfaction. There was

also no usable evidence to enable conclusions to be drawn about which was the best SEP,

acid, concentration or etching time.

Advantages of SEP

1. Less time 23 second per bracket

2. Less discomfort to pt because it doesn’t require rinsing

3. Less enamel removed by etch

4. Less decalcification

5. less discoloration Zaher 2012

6. Less bonding materials as a remnant left after deboning Bishara 1998

Disadvantage of SEP

• Expensive

• Low bond strength

• Difficult to judge bec of no classical chalky appearance

• Since it is colourless then it might be washed out and irritate the gingivae

5

Page 6: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

• Tech sensitive

• teeth should be pumiced before

The bonding adhesive materials

The bonding materials used in orthodontics are:

1. Diacrylates

2. Cyanoacrylates

3. Glass ionomer cements

4. Glass polyalkenoate cements

5. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements

6. Compomers (polyacid-modified resin composites)

7. Glass polyphosphonate cements

Diacrylates

1. Composite introduced by Bowen 1962

2. They are most commonly based on the aromatic dimethacrylate monomer Bis-GMA and are

referred to as composites or composite resins if they also contain filler particles.

3. The term composite applies only to those resin based materials that contain at least 50% of

filler by mass.

4. The filler particles consist of glass beads or rods, aluminium silicate, barium, strontium and

borosilicate glasses. This filler content can vary greatly, forming in the order of 50 - 80% by

weight of the material.

5. Fillers reduce the polymerisation shrinkage and coefficient of thermal expansion of the

material as well as improving abrasion resistance, provide radipopacity and easy of handling

1. Chemically cured Diacrylates

Chemically cured diacrylate bonding agents are presented in one of two forms.

6

Page 7: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

• Twin paste

• No-mix

2. Light cured

• The use of a light cured diacrylate for bonding metal orthodontic brackets was first described

by Tavas and Watts (1979).

• It is important the light has a wavelength of approximately 440-480nm for photoinitiation to

take place.

• Light curing times commonly vary between 10 seconds per inter-space (totalling 20 seconds

per tooth) for halogen lamps to as little as 3 seconds per tooth for plasma arc lamps

(Pettemerides et al. 2002).

Advantages

• Extended working time

• It is much easier to clean up

• The ability to immediately cure a single bracket may reduce the chance of moisture

contamination

• Pre-coated metal and ceramic brackets are available, so-called Adhesive Pre Coat brackets

(APC - 3M Unitek). It provide less composite flash and better cross infection control and fast.

Bishara 1997 found pre-coated ceramic better than uncoated and vise vesa in metal

• (O’Brien 1989). Found no difference bet chemical and light cure bonding.

Disadvantages

When bonding a whole arch with a conventional light source, extra time is required. This

disadvantage has been significantly reduced by the introduction of high speed curing lights

3. Dual cured

1. The polymerisation of the material is brought about as follows:

• by chemical cure in four minutes

• by conventional light cure in 30 seconds

• the material can be “tacked” with a 10 second light cure and then allowed to cure

chemically.

2. The system is a paste/paste adhesive and utilizes a light or chemically cured sealant.

7

Page 8: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

The advantages

• Dual cure adhesive can be quickly tacked with the light and then left to fully set chemically

• If the operator fails to cure with the light for a sufficient time for a complete cure, this does

not matter with a dual cure adhesive which is therefore less technique sensitive than light

cure materials

• The use of dual cure adhesives has been evaluated by Smith and Shivapuja (1993) and

gave similar bond strengths to chemically cured and light cured materials.

The disadvantages

• Mixing of two pastes is required and this requires time,

• Lower bond strength will result if the material is starting to set when applied.

• They are not commonly used in orthodontics, since the bond-line thickness of the adhesive in

orthodontics is so small as not to pose a problem of residual polymer.

Cyanoacrylates (superglues)

• Cyanoacrylates were first developed by Eastman Kodak in the 1950's

• Cyanoacrylates can cure very rapidly when in contact with only the smallest amounts of

moisture,

• This polymerization process occurs in approximately five seconds and is therefore a

disadvantage in direct bonding. However this is a useful characteristic for indirect bonding.

• Klocke et al (2003) investigated the use of cyanoacrylates in indirect bonding and again

significantly lower bond strengths were found with the cyanoacrylate than with a

conventional indirect bonding adhesive

Glass ionomer cements (Glass polyalkenoate cements)

These cements were first introduced in 1972 (Wilson and Kent 1972) and are also commonly

known as glass ionomer cements. :

1. Liquid - an aqueous solution of an organic acid, such as poly(acrylic), poly(maleic) acid.

2. Powder - consists of ion-leachable glasses, namely calcium-alumino-fluoro-silicate glasses.

8

Page 9: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

The use of glass ionomer cements for bonding has been suggested for some time.

The bond strength issues are a particular problem and several authors have reported

higher bond failure rates with glass ionomer cements (50.9%, 20%) than with composites

(7.8%, 5%) (Fricker 992, Miguel et al 1995).

Advantages

1. Ease of bracket and adhesive removal

2. Longer working time

3. their greater compressive and tensile strengths,

4. The possibility of eliminating etching

5. The possibility of being able to bond in a wet environment

6. Sustained fluoride release because it has hydrogyle group which take fluoride and release

when the Ph of mouth drop.

7. Less decalcification because of fluoride release.

8. Their ability to chelate via an acid-base reaction with both enamel and dentine and to form

ionic bonds with stainless steel.

9. Glass ionomer cements bond to enamel by the interaction of polyacrylic acid with the

hydroxyapatite of the enamel. Not only is surface hydroxyapatite dissolved through

interaction with such acid solution, but polyacrylic acid also remains absorbed to the

hydroxyapatite.

Disadvantages

9

Page 10: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

1. The bond strength is less than that of composite. Recommended the use of a conditioning

agent of 10% polyacrylic acid prior to bonding to increase its bonding

2. Glass ionomer cements do not reach their maximum strength for 24 hours

Glass polyphosphonate cements

Containing Aluminino-silicate glass, poly (vinyl-phosphoric acid) and tartaric acid.

The claimed advantages of glass polyphosphonates over conventional glass

polyalkenoate cements are

1. A rapid set,

2. A high compressive strength,

3. A low solubility.

A study by Clark et al (2003) show similar failure rate to conventional GIC.

Resin-modified glass ionomer cement

These cements became available in the early 1990's and differ from the glass polyalkenoate

cements in that they also possess a resin component, namely HEMA (hydroxyethyl

methacrylate). This can form up to 15% of the cement and can be chemically or light

activated.

This resin will set by photochemical polymerisation independly of the GIC reaction setting,

which is acid base and it increase the strength of the cement.

In addition to the chemical bonding of RMGICs, resin monomers penetrate surface

irregularities to produce a micromechanical interlock (bond) after polymerization to form the

resin tags. Demke 2001.

An alternative to the diacrylates as bonding agents, although like the glass polyalkenoate they

can also be used as band cements.

When used for direct bonding, reported clinical bond failure rates have been found to be

comparable with those seen using diacrylate bonding agents (Ireland 2001).

10

Page 11: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Modified composite or Compomers (polyacid-modified resin composites)

• These differ from resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cements principally in the ratio of the

resin component, which is in the order of 30-50% (Gladys et al. 1997).

• Clinical bond failure rates of brackets bonded using compomer have been found to be

comparable to those seen with diacrylate bonding agents,

• The compomer may have the additional advantage of reducing the risk of in treatment

decalcification (Millett et al. 2002).

• Gillgrass et al 2001 compared chemically cured glass ionomer cement with light-

cured compomer (band-lock) found GIC better than band lock in bond failure but Ireland

2001 found no difference

• It is used in case when conevtional etching pattern can not be achieved as in

amelogenisis imperfect or fluorosis cases.

Chromatic adhesives

It is recognized that if the excess adhesive is not removed, it increases the amount of plaque

and can act as a mechanical irritation to the gingiva, and, therefore, potentially increase the

incidence of white spot lesions. Armstrong et al (2007) no advantages.

Thermochromatic

This is an adhesive which is:

1. dark blue when dispensed

2. turns tooth coloured above 32°C (10 second cure time)

3. reverts to a dark blue colour below 32°C to allow complete removal with the coolant system

at debonding stage (and is therefore a two-way colour change adhesive

Antibacterial adhesives

Another useful characteristic of an adhesive might be to give it antibacterial properties to

reduce demineralisation around the bracket pad by using what is called MDPB.

11

Page 12: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Additional information

• Cochrane review to compare different bonding materials by Mandal 2009 , It is difficult to

draw any conclusions from this review; however, suggestions are made for methods of

improving future research involving orthodontic adhesives.

Banding Cements

There are four types of orthodontic cement available today:

Zinc phosphate cements.

Polycarboxylate cement (chemcical bond to tooth by replacing Ca ions)

Glass ionomer cements

Resin modified glass ionomer cements

Poly acid modified composite resins (compomer)

From Demke 2001,

• Durning 1989 compared bet zinc phosphate and GIC and found failure rate and decal less in

GIC , same result by Stirrups from Glasgow in 1991.

• Cochrane review by Millett 2008, There is insufficient evidence to determine the most

effective adhesive for attaching orthodontic bands to molar teeth in patients with full arch

fixed orthodontic appliances.

12

Page 13: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

• Cochrane review by Millet 2011, the failure of molar tubes bonded with either a chemically-

cured or light-cured adhesive was considerably higher than that of molar bands cemented

with glass ionomer cement. One trial indicated that there was less decalcification with molar

bands cemented with glass ionomer cement than with bonded molar tubes cemented with a

light-cured adhesive.

Bonding to deciduous teeth enamel

A recommended procedure for conditioning deciduous teeth is to sandblast with 50-micromm

aluminum oxide for 3 seconds to remove some outermost aprismatic enamel and then etch for

30 seconds with the Ultraetch 35% phosphoric acid gel. The failure rate with this procedure

for the authors is less than 5%. (Zachrisson )

Bonding to fluorosed enamel

Noble et al (2008)

• Used strong acid (40% phosphoric acid) for longer time 60 second

• Alternatives micro abrasion of the enamel surface with etching in order to provide enough

• Used compomer and he thought to assist roughness of the enamel surface to ensure reliable

bonding.

• Use band instead.

Disadvantages of microabrasion

1. Damage to the enamel surface

2. A recommendation to use rubber dam

3. The problem of confining the powder to the area to be etched

4. Patient ingestion of the abrasive powder

5. Potential allergy to the abrasive powder (aluminium oxide or silicon carbide)

Bonding to bleached surfaces

• Bleached teeth have a 25% reduction in bond strength to composite.

• This may be because the enamel surface is oxygen rich and that this prevents polymerisation

of the composite.

13

Page 14: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

• If patients are self-bleaching, then it is advised that no bleaching takes place within a three-

week period prior to the fitting of appliances.

• Lai et al (2002) have shown experimentally that treatment with sodium ascorbate reverses the

negative effects of bleaching on enamel.

Bonding to non-tooth structures

Methods of optimizing the bond strength between metal brackets and non-enamel surfaces.

1. Mechanical preparation (provides mechanical bond for metals & porcelain)

• Retention cavity

• Microetching BY chemicals, electrical, sandblasting or laser

• Tin plating

2. Chemical preparation (provides mechanical bond for porcelain)

• 9.6% Hydrofluoric acid (HF) – for 2-4 minutes

• 4% Acidulated fluorophosphate (AFP) – for 2 minutes

• 37% Phosphoric acid – for 1 minute

3. Surface treatment (provides chemical bond for metals & porcelain)

• Silane coupling agents

• Primers/intermediate resins

• Adhesive bonding/luting resins

Intraoral Sandblasting

1. utilizes aluminium oxide powder 50Micron

2. Increase bond strengths by creating a retentive surface with microscopic undercuts

(Zachrisson et al., 1993).

14

Page 15: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

3. It also has other applications including the removal of composite from loose brackets and

from tooth surfaces as well as increasing the retentiveness of stainless steel bands (Millet et

al., 1995 & Miller et al., 1996).

4. removing composite from tooth surfaces (requires different abrasive)

Tin Plating

1. Tin is deposited either electrolytically using a unit such as MicroTin or manually by rubbing

Adlloy solution on to the metal surface.

2. This produces a uniform whitish coating of 0.2μ which when exceeds 0.5μ results in reduced

bond strength.

Bonding to Porcelain

Zachrisson in 1993 recommend:

1. Sandblasting with 50-μ Al2O3 for 2-4 seconds

2. Application of 2-3 coats of silane coupling agent

3. Application of intermediate resin eg All-Bond 2

4. Bonding with a highly filled bisGMA resin eg Concise

Bourke et al in 1999 recommend:

37% phosphoric acid for 60 seconds. Phosphoric acid does not etch porcelain like

hydrofluoric acid. Instead, it neutralizes the alkaline adsorbed water layer present of all

porcelain restorations in the mouth. This enhances the chemical activity of any silane

agent applied subsequently (Wolf et al., 1993)

Silane coupling agent

Intermediate adhesive (unfilled light-cured resin)

Composite resin

Bishara et al 2005 recommended:

Sandblasting

15

Page 16: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

HF acid etching. The hydrofluoric acid differentially dissolves the glass and crystalline

phases of porcelain surface to increase the surface area available for bonding

Silane coupling agent. The silane reacts with the hydrofluoric acid to form silanol which

is a chemically reactive compound that adsorbs to porcelain surface and lowers its

wettability

Composite

Bonding to gold

Büyükyilmaz et al in 1995 recommend:

• Sandblasting

• Metal adhesive like 4-META metal adhesive.

• Intermediate application resin.

• Composite resin

• Tin plating can improve the bond strengths only marginally. This procedure is not

FDA approved (potential toxicity) and therefore is not recommended for orthodontic practice

Bonding to amalgam

Zachrisson et al., 1993 recommend:

• There is usually enough enamel around buccal amalgam fillings to bond a bracket to,

with a failure rate of 3

• The recommended method is:

• Sandblasting for 2-4 seconds from a distance of 1cm

• 4-META metal adhesive

• The use of an intermediate primer with short curing time like Reliance Metal Primer

• Alternatively, the intermediate application of a primer like All-Bond 2 Primers A+B.

Recent technologies

More recently, laser might be an alternative method for conditioning porcelain surfaces.

16

Page 17: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Factors that influenced clinicians to use bonded molars over banded molars included

the following Millet 2012

Easier to involve partially erupted teeth (89%),

Quicker to place than molar bands (72%)

Separators were not required (70%).

Easier to monitor decalcification (55%) and for less risk of gingival inflammation (69%).

Bracket materials

1. Metal (SS, CrCo,NiTi)

2. Ceramic

3. Polycarbonate (very weak and creep under force)

4. Polyurethane

Another classification

0.018*0.028

0.022*0.028

0.022*0.030 for easy placement of piggy back

Technique of manufacturing the brackets

• Milling: Originally, stainless steel appliances were made from cold drawn stainless steel strip

with the slot milled into them

• Casting: investment casting to make the brackets

• MIM: A new technique called Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) was found to be ideal for

producing orthodontic brackets and tubes.

In details

Stainless steel bracket

1. Stainless steel bracket (Iron 71, Nickle 8, Cr 18, carbon)

2. Construction:

17

Page 18: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Castable,

Milled,

Metal injection moulding

Titanium

• Used in allergic pt to nickel. It is more wettable than SS so it bond better to bonding

materials.

• Titanium: covered by layer of Ti to reduce friction

CrCo.

• Less nickel sensitivity and less release of nickel

• Harder than stainless steel.

• Less friction than stainless steel brackets.

Aesthetic and ceramic bracket (see adults orthodontics notes)

Lingual bracket (see the lingual appliance notes)

Invisalign (see the clear aligner appliance notes)

Aesthetic wire in orthodontics (see adults orthodontics notes)

HG tubes

1. 0.045 or 0.051 inch round

2. Either occ for easy control and cleanseness

3. Or gingival to be close to the centre of rotation

18

Page 19: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Welding

1. Welding is the joining of two metals by melting and fusing the base metals being joined with

or without the use of a filler material.

2. Welding normally takes place at between 800°C and 1635°C.

3. A welded joint is typically as strong as or stronger than the two base metals being joined.

4. Classified into

• Resistance welding is the co-ordinated application of electric current and mechanical pressure

to create a coalescent bond;

• Laser welding (YAG lasers ) is commonly used by orthodontic manufacturers

Soldering

1. Soldering is a group of joining processes by heating them to a suitable temperature and using

a filler material with a liquidus

2. Less than 450°C.

3. The filler material is evenly distributed between the two closely approximated surfaces to be

joined by capillary attraction.

4. A low silver content solder is sufficient for orthodontic soldering (typically is 43% silver,

37% copper 20% zinc).

5. Flux is required to keep the solder and soldered pieces covered to prevent oxidation (Borax)

Solders for orthodontic purposes require the following properties

1. The melting point of the solder must be about 50°C less than the melting point of the two

metals to be joined.

2. The solder should have a good bonding for the metals to be joined

3. The solder should not corrode or tarnish within the mouth

19

Page 20: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

20

Page 21: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Arch wire materials

Stress described as Force/Area and determined by Pascals (N/m2). The stress is quantified as

the internal force generated by the material which is equal in magnitude and opposite in

reaction to a given force. There are different types of stress described.

1. compressive

2. tensile

3. shearing

4. flexural

Strain Described as the change in length of a material relative to its original length after an

applied force. It may recover or remain deformed.

Proportional or Elastic Limit This is the maximum value of stress before permanent

deformation occurs.

Yield strength: This is the value of stress at which 0.1% deformation occur.

Ultimate strength: This is the value of stress at which permanent deformation occur

Failure point: This is the value of stress at which breakage occur.

21

Page 22: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Strength: The ability of a material to resist stress without fracture. The stress at the point of

fracture determines the strength of the material.

Modulus of Elasticity: Calculated on the slope of the stress/strain diagram (the red one) i.e.

defined as stress/strain. This can also be expressed as the rigidity of the material, with a high

modulus indicating an increased rigidity.

Range (or minimum elastic radius) : Describes the amount a wire can be displaced(on the

diagram described as linear amount on horizontal direction) without permanent deformation.

Springback: Describes the amount a wire can be displaced with only 0.1% deformation (on

the diagram described as linear amount on horizontal direction).

Resilience: This is the amount of energy absorbed before plastic deformation occurs. On a

stress/strain diagram it is described as the area under the slope up until the elastic limit.

Ductility or formability: The amount of energy absorbed before failure of fracture of an

orthodontic wire (area under the slop from yield point to failure point).

Toughness : The amount of energy a material can absorb before fracturing.(in the diagram is

the area under the curve from failure point. It is equal to Resilience + Ductility). A material

with low toughness is described as being brittle. The toughness of a material can be

illustrated as the area under a stress/strain diagram.

Work hardening or steel hardening: it is a process of repeated application of force that

pass the yield strength but less than the ultimate strength. This will cause a repeated

deformation of 0.1%. as a result the distance between the yield strength point and the failure

point will be decreased on the stress strain curve which means that the ductility or the

formability will be reduced leading to fracture. The crystal will be stressed in this situation.

Annealing is the process of reducing the crystal stress and improve the ductility again.

The ideal orthodontic wire would have the following properties:

1. Low modulus of elasticity (low stiffness)

2. Friction free

22

Page 23: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

3. High strength

4. High toughness (low brittleness)

5. High range

6. High springback

7. High resiliency

8. High formability

9. Weldable

10. Solderable

11. Low cost

12. Biocompatible

13. Aesthetic

14. Shape memory

15. Super elasticity

Amount of force=distance of defelction*radius of wire4/Length of wire3

The behaviour of an arch wire

The behaviour of an archwire depends upon:

1) The composition of the wire.

2) The diameter of the wire.

3) The length and configuration of the interbracket span.

4) The width of the brackets.

5) The friction between the wire and the bracket channel.

23

Page 24: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Classification

• Material- as mentioned above

• Morphology- round, rectangular, hybrid, arch form

• Coated or non coated –ion implantation, spray coating, sleeving

• Properties- as described previously

Gold or Precious Metals, Kusy 2000

Largely of historical significance.

Angle used it routinely.

Popular until the mid 1950’ and obsolete on the introduction of stainless steel in the 1970’s.

Gold is too soft although

Incorporation of platinum and paladium into gold may still be useful (Proffit 1993)

Stainless Steel

Austenitic form

18 % chromium (anticorrosion)

8% nickel (increase ductibility)

iron 70% and carbon (to increase strength) .

24

Page 25: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Properties:

1. Corrosion/rust resistant.

2. High strength

3. High stiffness

4. Soldering , Possible - therefore auxillaries such as archwire hooks can be incorporated

5. Friction is low. This is very advantageous for sliding mechanics.

Heat treatment of SS

The SS wire is constructed by cold drawing. After each drawing to minimize the diameter,

the wire crystal become elongated and tempered. So heat 800 degree is used after each

drawing or annealing except after the last drawing to relieve stress incorporated on bending

of the wire. The ductility of the wire increases at the expense of the ultimate tensile strength.

Stainless steel may vary in

1. Composition

2. Degree of work hardening- hard, spring hard and extra spring hard

3. Packaged form- straight or coiled

4. Arch form

Bonwill-Hawley

Catenary Curve

Trifocal ellipse of Brader arch form

5. Cross sectional shape

Round

Square

Rectangular

6. Multistrands wire

Co-axial- central stainless steel wire

twisted around

Twistflex wire- 3 SS wires twisted together combining many thin wires will

increase the strength but decrease the springiness.

7. Cross sectional diameter

25

Page 26: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Cobalt Chromium

e.g. Elgiloy (40% Cr, 20% Co, 15% Nickle, 15% Iron, 7% magnisium and carbon)

Has the advantage over stainless steel that it is softer and therefore more formable, but can be

hardened by heat treatment 480 degree afterwards and thus increasing its strength.

Properties:

1. Smaller spring back than SS unless heat treated

2. Good formability

3. High modulus of elasticity

4. Greater resistance to fatigue/distortion

5. Larger friction than SS

6. Risk of annealing when soldering leading to a loss in yield strength

Nickel Titanium

In the late 1960s the Office of the Navy was studying new types of alloys that

exhibited shape memory effect (SME) (Buehler & Wiley, 1962).

A nickel titanium alloy was called Nitinol, an acronym of Nickel-Titanium Naval

Ordinance Laboratory. Nickel titanium archwires have now been used in orthodontics since

the 1970s.

The composition is 52% Ni, 43% Ti, 3% Co. Essentially there are 3 types of

commercially available (Kusy, 1997):

Three types of nickel titanium, Kusy 1997, 2000

1. Martensitic stabilised alloy (eg. Unitek's original Nitinol) non-elastic Effect

2. Austenitic Active Alloy (eg. Nitinol Superelastic) Pseudoelastic Effect

3. Martensitic Active Alloy (eg. Neo-Sentalloy) Thermoelastic Effect

Austenitic phase : high temperature metallurgical phase with hexagonal crystal

Martensitic phase: low temperature metallurgical phase with cubical crystal

26

Page 27: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Shape memory effect is the ability of a wire to return to its original shape when the

temperature elevated. It is a feature of martensitic active NiTi alloy.

R structure a metastable rhombohedral structured intermediate phase between

austenite and martensite (Khier et al 1991). The R structure always seems to be present in an

austenite to martensite transformation but not always in the reverse transformation (Bradley

et al 1996).

Superelasticity the martensite-austenite phase transformations, generated by

mechanical stress or heat, which result in a segment of the loading curve for nickel titanium

alloys in which stress is independent of applied strain (or the force per unit deflection is

constan). It only exists when both phases of the alloy are present. Tonner and Waters (1994)

showed that the superelastic wires have to be deflected at least 2 mm before exhibiting

plateau behaviour

Pseudoelastic effect defined as change in the alloy phase from austenistic (hexagonal

crystal structure) to martenistic (cuboid crystal structure ) when force leading to higher

resiliency, then when force relived the change in the opposite way start to occur. Since

austenite has a higher elastic modulus, on loading, the slope of the graph starts with a slope

three times that of martensitic stabilised alloy;

Thermoelasticity the thermal analogue of pseudoelasticity in which the martensitic

phase transformation occurs from austenite as the temperature increase. The phase

transformation can be reversed by decreasing the temperature to its original value (pseudo-

shearing). Bishara et al (1995) have produced a useful list of the ideal properties of

thermoelastic archwires. These are:

1. Highly ductile at room temperature

2. Instantaneous activation at mouth temperature

3. Ability to develop forces that will produce tooth movement

4. Once fully activated, the wire is not further activated by the heat of the mouth

5. A narrow temperature transition range such that the wire is highly ductile at room

temperature and highly active at mouth temperature

Hysteresis The genius-like characteristic of this transition from the austenitic to

martensitic form is that the unloading curve is different to that of the loading curve displaying

reduced and constant levels of stress present over a large area of strain. To clarify in

orthodontic terms, this allows a low but constant force to be applied on teeth once the wires

27

Page 28: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

have been ligatured into the brackets, despite the presence of considerable irregularities in the

patients’ archform. In material science this known as hysteresis; that being the force to

activate is not the same as the force which is delivered.

The change in crystaline structure can be brought about by either:

a) Stress, as in the pseudoelastic effect in the Austenitic Active Alloy.

b) Heat, as in the thermoelastic effect in the Martensitic Active Alloy where the transition

temperature is between room and mouth temperatures.

Conventional alloy (Martensitic stable)

This alloy is a stabilised martensitic alloy.

The archwire remains in the martensitic phase under clinical conditions despite changes in

stress and temperature.

Properties

1. Low stiffness (1/6th of that of SS)

2. No superelastic properties

3. Greater springback than SS.

4. Friction higher than SS but lower than TMA

5. Cannot be weltered or soldered (Kusy, 1997)

6. Can recycle with no appreciable loss of properties

Austenitic active (pseudoelastic)

The second generation pseudoelastic NiTi alloys were introduced by

1. Burstone et al., (1985) as Chinese NiTi

2. Miura et al., (1986) as Japanese NiTi.

Copper NiTi

1. This is an austenitic active wire whose copper additions reduce the hyetserisis

2. The latest alloy to utilise pseudo elasticity is 27˚C Superelastic copper NiTi (if the TTR is 35

or 41 , the wire will be considered as thermoelastic NITI).

28

Page 29: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

3. This contains 5 to 6 % copper and 0.2 to 0.5% chromium.

4. These benefits occur at the expense of raising its phase transition temperature to above that of

the oral cavity. To compensate for this 0.5% chromium returns the transition temperature to

27%.

Thermoelastic NiTi (Martensitic active)

This Niti wire not only undergoes the stress induced phase transformation of its crystal

structure, but also demonstrates a change in crystal structure with a change in temperature.

The temperature at which a temperature transition occurs referred to as the temperature

transition range (TTR). Below the TTR the wire is in the martensitic phase with a low

modulus of elasticity and it can therefore be deformed (strained) easily. As the wire rises

towards mouth temperature, the wire begins its transition and return to its original shape and

stiffness.

Heat activated nickel titanium not used in:

1. OB reduction

2. OJ reduction

3. Torque control

4. With laceback to control severely tipped canine

5. OCS to gain space for blocked teeth

It is important to remember that:

1. Thermoelasticity makes archwires easier to tie in

2. Then after wire ligation and temperature elevation, the wire will behave like active

austenitic.

3. The stress will induce superelasticity where the austenitic phase transform to

martensitic phase

4. The shape memory occurs when martensitic phase transform to the austenitic phases.

Temperature Transformation 27oC

1. Superelastic, Not thermally active during clinical use.

2. Recommended for use in patients who have

29

Page 30: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Average / High pain threshold.

Normal periodontal health.

Where rapid movement required

Temperature Transformation 35oC

Low pain threshold.

Reduced periodontal health.

Low forces required.

Temperature Transformation 40oC

Sensitive pain.

Compromised perio health.

Slow tooth movement required.

As initial rectangular archwire.

Graded thermoelastic NiTi

That produced different force level in different section of the AW (anteriorly the force is less

than posteriorly)

Titanium- molybdenum alloy (Beta Titanium) TMA

1. Described as a cross between Ni-Ti and Stainless steel, Beta Titanium was marketed as TMA

and contained titanium (79%), molybdenum (11%), Zinc (6%), Strantium (4%).

2. It had very good strength but produced twice the force of NiTi and 1/3 of stainless steel,

therefore not compromising anchorage and also could be deflected double the distance.

3. good torque control

4. good corrosion resistance

5. the ability to withstand soldering.

6. One of the major disavdantages of using TMA is its high frictional characteristics due largely

to its ability to cold weld to stainless steel brackets, therefore rendering it unusable when

teeth have to be moved a considerable distance.

7. Currently experiments involving the implantation of ions into the wire in order to reduce the

frictional resistance are under way.

30

Page 31: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Titanium-niobium

1. Have 60% of the stiffness of TMA and are easy to bend.

2. Recommended as finishing wires

Mulitstrand Wire

1. The philosophy behind it’s manufacture is to provide a material which retains the flexibility

of the individual strand but with an accumulative strength.

2. Kusy and Dilley (1984) compared 0.0175 triple stranded stainless steel twistflex with 0.010

stainless steel wire and 0.016 Nitinol. it’s strength was 25% greater than that of 0.010

stainless steel, but did not posses the same range of action as Nitinol.

3. Tidy (1989) suggested high notching.

4. The latest Cochrane review showed that there no difference between different type of AW in

the alignment stage except a little significant better difference when coaxial NiTi is used

(Wang 2013)

Facts about superelastic wires

There is little published work on the effectiveness of superelastic nickel-titanium wires.

O'Brien et al (1990) showed no significant difference in contact point alignment between

Nitinol and Titanol archwires over a five-week period.

Superelasticity starts after significant deflection only, but at the same time this deflection will

increase the TTR above mouth temperature making the wire non superelastic hhhhhh

Dual dimension archwires normally have a rectangular section in the anterior region and

round wire posteriorly. Wonder Wire (Wonder Wire Corporation) was the first archwire to

have this feature but the company no longer seems to be in business;

Clinical requirements of the orthodontic wires

LEVELING AND ALIGNING

The appropriate wire for this stage has to exhibit good springiness, low stiffness, good spring

back

31

Page 32: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

1. Gold

2. Looped stainless steel

3. Elgiloy

4. Multi-strand stainless steel wires

5. Nickel titanium alloy wires

• Major drawbacks of using low rigidity AW like NiTi include cost, and also the

introduction of unfavourable forces on teeth adjacent to grossly maligned units. This is also

known as the rollercoaster effect and a common presentation is the intrusion of an upper

lateral incisor adjacent to a buccally placed and partially erupted canine which is being

extruded. This can be avoided by the use of lighter forces, for example avoiding full

engagement of the wire in the bracket

Retraction of teeth along a base archwire

The base arch, normally .018 or .017 x .025" stainless steel, has to exhibit good stiffness and

strength to resist distortion during the movement of teeth along the wire

Overbite control

The ideal properties include:

1. High strength- to prevent loss of arch form and bite opening curves

2. High stiffness- to provide sufficient force to initially open the bite and maintain the

overbite reduction

3. Good formability- to allow increased and reverse curves to be placed

4. High resilience

Commonly used archwires include: Rocking chair NiTi 0.019x0.025 or SS 0.019x0.025 or

0.021x0.025. If a Rickets utility arch is to be used then a Co-Cr wire.

Space closure and overjet reduction

The ideal properties include

a) High stiffness to prevent archwire flexing causing in tipping of the teeth into

extraction spaces

32

Page 33: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

b) High strength to maintain the arch form

c) High formability to allow closing loops if desired and torque

d) By this stage, three dimensional control is required and the base arch is a

rectangular .019 x.025" stainless steel.

e) Overbite control, is brought about by the base arch itself. Space closure is

accomplished with auxiliaries.

Various forms of elastic traction, closing modules, powerchain, elastic bands.

Niti closing coil springs have been shown to produce more rapid and consistent space closure

(Samuels, 1993).

Torque control

a) The base arch for the final stage of treatment is .019 x .025 SS

b) When individual torque is needed, eg. if 2 or 3 have palatal roots, a wire is needed

which can produce a much lower force over a longer range such as.019 x .025 TMA. The

downside is the loss of overbite control.

Archwire sequence guide

The general concept is to think in terms of three main wires, around which other wires are

used as intermediate 'stepping stones' between the main wires or to achieve specific

objectives.

Four main wires:

1) .014 or .016 nickel titanium aligning arch, either active austenitic or active martensitic

depending on the degree of malalignment. It is easier to fully engage martensitic wire as it is

softer at room temperature.

2) .018 round stainless steel base arch for sliding individual teeth mesio-distally, usually to close

labial segment spacing or to retract canines.

3) .017 x .025 SS or .018 x .025 Niti to initiate correction of torque differential in adjacent teeth.

Early use of rectangular (.018 x .025) or square (.020 x .020) Niti is particularly applicable

where bracket selection has been customised.

4) .019 x .025 stainless steel final base arch for overbite control, torque and space closure.

33

Page 34: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Intermediate 'Stepping stone' wires:

From 1) to 2)

- If starting with .014 Niti, a .018 Niti or .016 Steel wire may be necessary for 4 to 6 weeks.

- If starting with .016 Niti, there may be no need for a stepping stone wire.

Mandall et al (2009) have undertaken a randomised clinical trial on archwire sequences

which measured time taken to get into an 0.019” x 0.025” working archwire, discomfort and

root resorption. The archwire sequences were:

1. 0.016” NiTi, 0.018” × 0.025” NiTi and 0.019” × 0.025” stainless steel

2. 0.016” NiTi, 0.016” stainless steel, 0.020” stainless steel and 0.019” × 0.025” stainless steel

3. 0.016” × 0.022” CuNiTi, 0.019” × 0.025” CuNiTi and 0.019” × 0.025” stainless steel

The authors found no difference in discomfort or amount of root resorption

There is no difference between multistrand and NiTi at initial stage. West 1995

There is no difference between NiTi and superelastic NITINOL O’Brien 1990

There is some evidence to suggest there is no difference between the speed of tooth

alignment or pain experienced by patients when using one initial aligning arch wire over

another except the coaxial NiTi AW. Wang 2013

34

Page 35: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

35

Page 36: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

36

Page 37: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Impression materials , Doubleday 1998

Impression materials is defined as the negative replica of the entire mouth including hard

tissues and soft tissues of the mouth, made in a plastic material, which relatively sets while

still in contacts with the tooth and tissues

Impression materials are used

1. To construct SM which is helpful in:

treatment planning,

fabrication of fixed or removable prostheses

post-treatment records

Silicon impression materials are often used when taking impression of neonates with

orofacial cleft.

2. Transferring orthodontic bracket using the indirect bonding technique.

3. Occlusal registration.

37

Page 38: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Alginate

1. Alginate is classified as an irreversible hydrocolloid material,

Advantages

low cost,

easy manipulation,

comfort to the patient,

hydrophilicity

2. Alginate impressions are not dimensionally stable prone to distortion caused by

expansion associated with imbibition (absorption of moisture) or shrinkage due to moisture

loss (syneresis), which is leading to decreased dimensional accuracy over time.

3. Pouring as soon as possible but no longer than 30 minutes (Powers 2006)

Chemical reaction

1. sodium or sodium alginates (soluble alginates),

2. calcium sulphate as reactor,

3. a fluoride as accelerator

4. sodium phosphate as a retarder

5. mint or vanilla flavours to their alginates.

6. Chlorhexidine into the alginate powder in an attempt to limit cross infection.

7. Some manufacturers include colour pH change

Na Alginate+CaSO4 Ca Alginate+Na2SO4

Silicone impression materials

Silicones are more stable than alginate and can poured 48 hours

There are two types of silicone impression materials Condensation cured and Addition cured.

Condensation cured silicones

1. are also known as polysiloxanes as they have alternating atom of oxygen and silicon.

2. Condensation cured silicones are two component systems with

Base past containing silicone polymer plus filler

Accelerator past containing cross linking agent plus an activator

38

Page 39: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Addition cured silicones

1. known as polyvinylsiloxanes.

2. They are generally presented as two putties that are mixed together by hand which are easier

and cleaner than condensation cure putties.

3. It is recommended not to wear latex gloves when mixing the putty or alternatively to use

vinyl gloves as the latex powder inhibits the set of addition silicones.

4. Addition cured silicones are the most accurate and stable up to seven days if kept dry.

5. The setting time of silicones is temperature dependent. Storing the materials in the

refrigerator can increase working time by quarter.

6. Special extra hard addition cured silicones have been developed for use as bit registration

materials.

Impression compound

1. Impression compound is mixture of natural resins (e.g. shellac, waxes), fillers (e.g. talc) and

lubricants (e.g. stearic acid).

2. It is thermoplastic, softens when heated and hardens when cooled.

3. It is useful for taking impression of neonates, as it does not tear and can be removed before

fully set in case of emergency..

Decontamination of impression materials and prosthetic and orthodontic appliances

1. immediately on removal from the mouth, the impression or appliance should be rinsed under

running water to remove saliva, blood and debris

2. continue the process until it is visibly clean.

3. If an appliance is grossly contaminated, it should be cleaned in an ultrasonic bath containing

detergent and then rinsed

4. the impression or appliance should be disinfected according to the manufacturer's

recommendations.

5. Generic materials such as sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) may no longer be suitable

for disinfecting impressions unless specifically recommended by the manufacturer

6. disinfectants should not be sprayed onto the surface of the impression; it lessens the

effectiveness and creates an inhalation risk.

7. Immersion of the impression is recommended

39

Page 40: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

8. the impression or appliance should be rinsed again in water before sending to the laboratory

accompanied by a confirmation that it has been disinfected.

9. Products that are suitable for the disinfection of impressions or appliances are CE marked to

demonstrate conformity to European Directives. The manufacturer's recommendations for the

dilution of the disinfectant and immersion time must be followed.

10. Preforma 2% containing quaternary ammonium for 10 min is a good way for disinfection.

Acrylic used in removable/functional appliance construction

The polymer used to make removable and functional appliances is based on methyl

methacrylate.

Methyl methacrylate monomer, which is a liquid at room temperature, can undergo

polymerisation to form poly (methyl methacrylate) or PMMA. This initiator must in turn be

activated by one of the following:

1. Electromagnetic radiation e.g. ultra-violet or visible light usually in the range of 440-480nm.

2. Heat.

3. Chemicals e.g. tertiary aromatic amine

In the cold cure resin, 10 minutes. 45°C, 2 - 3 bar..

Hot cure, 72°C, 16 hours, 3000 bar.

Elastic materials

Structures

1. Elastomerics amourphous polymer

2. Elastomer is a general term that encompasses materials that, after substantial deformation,

rapidly return to their original dimensions. They are either natural or synthetic rubber.

3. At rest, a random geometric pattern of folded linear molecular chains exists. On extension or

distortion, these molecular chains unfold in an ordered linear fashion. This is called stress

induced crystallization.

40

Page 41: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

4. Primary bond maintain the bond between the chain after release of the extension forces.

5. If the primary bonds are broken, the elastic limit has been exceeded and permanent

deformation occur.

6. Synthetic polymers are very sensitive to the effects of free radical generating systems like

ozone and ultraviolet light. The exposure to free radicals results in a decrease in the flexibility

and tensile strength of the polymer. Manufacturers have added antioxidants and antiozonates

to retard these effects and extend the shelf life of elastomerics

Advantages

1. inexpensive,

2. can be placed by the pt

3. the prescription of the use can be changed over the time between activation

4. relatively hygienic,

5. easily applied

6. Require little or no patient cooperation.

7. They are used to generate light continuous forces for canine retraction, diastema

closure, rotational correction, and arch constriction

8. Isotrop feature which mean the elastic gives the same force in all direction.

NB: the elastic should be stretched 3 time of its diameter

Disadvantages

1. permanently stain,

2. suffer a breakdown of internal bonds that leads to permanent deformation

3. stress relaxation, resulting in a gradual loss of effectiveness

41

Page 42: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Elastomerics physical properties

1. Viscoelasticity

2. Stress-relaxation

3. Prestretching effects,

4. Hysteresis

5. Hysteresis loss

Viscoelasticity

Material behaviour under different level of temperature

Viscoelasticity if the material is cooled, the motion of the molecules within the material is

reduced and it behaves like a glassy solid.

42

Page 43: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Above a temperature, known as the glass transition temperature (GTT), the material behaves

more like a viscous rubber.

As the temperature continues to rise even further, the motion between the molecules can

increase to such an extent that it will behave more like a viscous liquid .

Stress-relaxation

1. As the name suggests this is the decrease in stress that occurs with time when an elastomer is

subjected to constant strain.

2. Bishara 1974 showe that PCE loss half of its force after 24 h and the remaining force stay for

4 weeks so he recommend over extension of the PCE.

3. Baty 1994 found

More consistent force if PCE manufactured by stamping rather than injection moulding

The initial force delivered depend on the company and so the force should be measured by

guage however the degradation is same for all types.

Short PCe produce more force which stays longer than long PCE.

Gray PCE bec of their filler maintain and produce higher force than clear type.

Prestretching effects,

recommended Prestretching the elastic chains a third of their original length to prestress the

molecular polymeric bonds and improve the strength. But there is no clinical difference

43

Page 44: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Hysteresis

This is the loss of mechanical energy seen between the loading and unloading curves for an

elastomer on a stress-strain curve. Therefore the force applied by an elastomeric chain or

thread used to move tooth will be less than the force applied to stretch the elastic in the first

instance.

Hysteresis loss

With repeated loading and unloading, energy will be repeatedly lost at each cycle. This might

occur when a patient is wearing intermaxillary elastics where the elastic bands will undergo

loading and unloading as the patient repeatedly opens and closes their mouth during the day.

Reuse of orthodontic materials from bos

The reuse of orthodontic materials involves several possible problems:

1. Patient’s attitude

Patients and parents may be unhappy at the thought that the appliance in question is “second-

hand”

2. Device performance

It is conceivable that the performance of a particular component may be affected by reuse.

For instance, the mechanical behaviour of a superelastic archwire could be different

3. Cross-infection control

in the case of bands that have been tried in for size but not actually used, it was thought that

the lumen of any attached tubes might not be adequately sterilised by autoclaving. Recent

evidence suggests that this concern is unfounded and that previously tried in bands can be

adequately sterilised using a bench top autoclave1.

All medical devices (except custom-made devices or those used in clinical trials) must have a

mark of conformity (CE) stamped on the device or the packaging.

Dental laboratories making custom appliances must register with the MDA unless their

products are used entirely “in-house”.

44

Page 45: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

Magnet in orthodontic

Noar 1999

Biological effect: it can produce corrosional by product but this can be eliminated by putting

the magnet in SS sheath. It has negligible side effect on the adjacent tissue.

Application in orthodontics

1. Intrusion of teeth (active vertical corrector) for treatment of AOB

2. Impacted teeth

3. Sliding of teeth and space closure and opening

4. Retainer of diastema

5. Slow Maxillary expansion

6. Distalization of molars

7. Functional appliance for cl2 high angle case

Light cure machine

Four types

A. Halogen: Conventional curing lights use halogen bulbs filtered to produce blue light.

They cure adhesive under metal brackets in 20-30 seconds.

Halogen lights have disadvantages:

• Halogen bulbs have a life of about 50 hours

• The bulb, reflector and filter degrade over time

• Halogen bulbs generate significant heat

B. LED (light emitting Diod)

Advantages

45

Page 46: Orthodontic materials by almuzian

Dr. Mohammed Almuzian, University of Glasgow 2012

4. Lifetimes of 10,000 hours

5. Undergo little light degradation during their life.

6. No filters are required to produce blue light,

7. LEDs are robust and require little power.

8. No heat generation

C. Plasma Arc

D. Laser

Dunn and Taloumis (2002) compared the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded

to teeth with conventional halogen-based light-curing units and commercially available LED

curing units. They studied two LED lights (Lumalite LumaCure and Centrix VersaLux) and

two halogen lights (Demetron Optilux 501 and Demetron ProLite). The study involved

bonding orthodontic brackets with Transbond XT to extracted third molar teeth and then

measuring the sear bond strength of the brackets using an Instron testing machine. No

significant difference in bond strength was found between the four lights;

Fleming 2013 no difference between the types of light

46