following this cover page are ... - judiciary of new york · 11/04/2019  · j.s.c. v — '...

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 09 2019

This Document Relates to:PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - C!VHIndex No.: 116360/02DIANE DIXON, EXECUTRIX OF THEESTATE OF LAWRENCE M. DEWALL

AND DIANE DIXON UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products

Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada

Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

f i f e', / , 2019

Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Diane Dixon, Executrix of the Estate of DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Lawrence M. Dewall and Diane DixonTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

SO ORDERED,APR 11 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIQ^ 2

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

APR 09 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 109474/03

THOMAS J. MARRONAND

FRANCES MARRON UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products

Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada

Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

f\ fc ,7 J, 2019

CL

Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas J. Marron and Frances MarronTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

E D|

APR U 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIQ&52

NBN YORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

APR 0 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 111933/03

COLLEEN M. FISCHER, PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE

OF WILLIAM D. MANNIXUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products

Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada

Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

A tr' l 1, 2019

Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAttorney for Plaintiffs

Colleen M. Fischer, Personal Representative DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.for the Estate of William D. Mannix MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

FSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

APR 11 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C.604-66

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)

APR 0 9 2019PART U

NYS SUPREME COiJR'1 Cl !This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 101049/03

IRWIN IFILLUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products

Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada

Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Baslil , 2019

Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffIrwin IfillTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

ipS3WSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez APR 11 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OH idg4-34

NEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL; I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)

APR 0 9 2019PART l.

NYS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 120080/03

LAWRENCE G. HOLOWIENKAUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products

Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada

Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Me111, 2019

S)sXOo

Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffsLawrence G. HolowienkaTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233 r

APR 11*SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

CLwr \-\Y\COUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

V— 'NEW YORK 604-73

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 0 9 2019

This Document Relates to: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIndex No.: 190157/10

FRANK X. HELSTABAND

MELINDA J. HELSTAB UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products

Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada

Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

fl ' / J , 2019

L

Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffsFrank X. Helstab and Melinda J. HelstabTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

SO ORDERED,APR 11 2019

COUNTY CLERK'SNEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. MendezOfHCE

604-381MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C .

»./ A

APR 09 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

I.A .S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTX • CIVIL

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

Ellen L, Knatz, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of Frederick Knatz, Index No.: 107424/2007

May 2008 In-ExtremisPlaintiffs

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGEMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-General Electric Company, et al.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACII & MOORE, INC.,

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross claims against EX-FM, INC. f/k/a

FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC, , with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant EX-FM , INC. f/k/a

FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs ,

Dated: Albertson, New YorkeTV S , 2019 . / ,/ &//

,/it /i - /Mfctfr'

Arthur G. Pryslowsky , Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P. A ,

Attorney for Plaintiff110 William Street , 26,b FloorNew York, New York 10038

/)

Frank A . Cecere, EsqAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for DefendantEX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH &MOORE, INC.,200 I . U . Willets RoadAlbertson , New York 11507Our File No. : TFZ 0765N7 FAC

SO ORDERED, FHon. Manuel J . Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. APR 11 2019

IK'S OFFICECOUNTY CLEfNEW YORK

I APR # 9 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

i

\j X

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE:

5 X

114792/02Index No.:PHYLLIS BUTCHER,

November 2018 In extremisWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Plaintiff(s),iii

-against-

ii UNOPPOSED SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.!r

X

1 WHEREFORE,defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor

by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation

(hereinafter: "CBS Corporation"), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant

CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS CORPORATION are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.Dated; New York, New York

Q%Cj\ q01°l

!

TANENBAUM KEALE LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

&By: Justin Siebel, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Pamela R. Kaplan, Esq.Attorneysfor CBS CorporationThree Gateway Center100 Mulberry Street,Suite 1301Newark,New Jersey 07102

SO ORDERED,Hon. ManuefJ. Mendez, J.S.C.

APR 11 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

1j

APR 0 9 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL i

:

1x •••

Index No.: 190082/2009IRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS, l

ri

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs, -?;

-against-t

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,I i

\

Defendants. ;3

>TT-

WHEREFORE, Defendant, THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND

NEW JERSEY (hereinafter “ PORT AUTHORITY” ) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Defendant, PORT AUTHORITY, with prejudice, and after

notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,•;.y>;<Tfo& sw-y-'-i v - . j . .. j*.

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims defendant, PORT AUTHORITY are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs;

Dated: New York, New York

j

i >,i5

2ii i

iJ

i h

i

ii

L83! I S*: :x.

W' w4 !

t rJustin Siebei,Esq/WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

An L _SEGAL Me& MAHONEY, ivraAttorneys for Defendant ThePort Authority of New York and NewJersey850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

GESINGER !

;

i!

.

:

i

SO ORDERED, .

iHon. Manuel J. Mendez

FMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C .

0ram i

iAPR 11 2019 ;

!

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

i

:

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to: Index No: 118531/2002

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

ROBERT J. SHANSTROM and RITA M.SHANSTROM

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by

merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against AIR

& LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS

CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., are dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

New York, New York, 2019Dated:

Danny R. Kraft, Jr., Esqui,

Weitz & Luxenberg, PJ1700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003®

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

"KeitfijS. Babula, EsquireWIWBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS

.- prCORPORATION, as successor by merger to^ BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.

APR 11 Z019

COUNTY CLERK'S OC MEW YORK

SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .s.c.

APR o9 mBA8(T 13

- CIVIL i1—

1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to: Index No: 190082/2009

IRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

X

WHEREFORE, defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by

merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against AIR

& LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS

CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., are dismissed with prejudice

and without costs., 2019Dated:

New York, New York

Danny R. Kraft, jr.,'%squi(re^/

x

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs

John Mowa. Babula, Esquire

WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMSCORPORATION, as successor by merger to

Kei

Wirt*

APR 11 2019^^PUFFALO PUMPS, INC.

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE _NEW YORK r \

APR 09 2019SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

PART 13

NYSSUWEHttourr

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S' Q: