following this cover page are ... - judiciary of new york · 11/04/2019 · j.s.c. v — '...
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 09 2019
This Document Relates to:PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - C!VHIndex No.: 116360/02DIANE DIXON, EXECUTRIX OF THEESTATE OF LAWRENCE M. DEWALL
AND DIANE DIXON UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products
Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada
Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
f i f e', / , 2019
Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Diane Dixon, Executrix of the Estate of DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Lawrence M. Dewall and Diane DixonTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
SO ORDERED,APR 11 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIQ^ 2
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 09 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 109474/03
THOMAS J. MARRONAND
FRANCES MARRON UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products
Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada
Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
f\ fc ,7 J, 2019
CL
Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas J. Marron and Frances MarronTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
E D|
APR U 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIQ&52
NBN YORK
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 0 9 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 111933/03
COLLEEN M. FISCHER, PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE
OF WILLIAM D. MANNIXUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products
Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada
Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
A tr' l 1, 2019
Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAttorney for Plaintiffs
Colleen M. Fischer, Personal Representative DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.for the Estate of William D. Mannix MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
FSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
APR 11 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S.C.604-66
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)
APR 0 9 2019PART U
NYS SUPREME COiJR'1 Cl !This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 101049/03
IRWIN IFILLUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products
Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada
Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Baslil , 2019
Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffIrwin IfillTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
ipS3WSO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez APR 11 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OH idg4-34
NEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL; I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)
APR 0 9 2019PART l.
NYS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 120080/03
LAWRENCE G. HOLOWIENKAUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products
Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada
Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Me111, 2019
S)sXOo
Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffsLawrence G. HolowienkaTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233 r
APR 11*SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
CLwr \-\Y\COUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
V— 'NEW YORK 604-73
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 0 9 2019
This Document Relates to: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIndex No.: 190157/10
FRANK X. HELSTABAND
MELINDA J. HELSTAB UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products
Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada
Products Co., Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
fl ' / J , 2019
L
Grace L. De Mario, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffsFrank X. Helstab and Melinda J. HelstabTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
SO ORDERED,APR 11 2019
COUNTY CLERK'SNEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. MendezOfHCE
604-381MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S.C .
»./ A
APR 09 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
I.A .S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTX • CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
Ellen L, Knatz, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of Frederick Knatz, Index No.: 107424/2007
May 2008 In-ExtremisPlaintiffs
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGEMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-General Electric Company, et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACII & MOORE, INC.,
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross claims against EX-FM, INC. f/k/a
FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC, , with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is
no opposition it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant EX-FM , INC. f/k/a
FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs ,
Dated: Albertson, New YorkeTV S , 2019 . / ,/ &//
,/it /i - /Mfctfr'
Arthur G. Pryslowsky , Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P. A ,
Attorney for Plaintiff110 William Street , 26,b FloorNew York, New York 10038
/)
Frank A . Cecere, EsqAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for DefendantEX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH &MOORE, INC.,200 I . U . Willets RoadAlbertson , New York 11507Our File No. : TFZ 0765N7 FAC
SO ORDERED, FHon. Manuel J . Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. APR 11 2019
IK'S OFFICECOUNTY CLEfNEW YORK
I APR # 9 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
i
\j X
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE:
5 X
114792/02Index No.:PHYLLIS BUTCHER,
November 2018 In extremisWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Plaintiff(s),iii
-against-
ii UNOPPOSED SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.!r
X
1 WHEREFORE,defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor
by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation
(hereinafter: "CBS Corporation"), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant
CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS CORPORATION are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.Dated; New York, New York
Q%Cj\ q01°l
!
TANENBAUM KEALE LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
&By: Justin Siebel, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Pamela R. Kaplan, Esq.Attorneysfor CBS CorporationThree Gateway Center100 Mulberry Street,Suite 1301Newark,New Jersey 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. ManuefJ. Mendez, J.S.C.
APR 11 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
1j
APR 0 9 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL i
:
1x •••
Index No.: 190082/2009IRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS, l
ri
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs, -?;
-against-t
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,I i
\
Defendants. ;3
>TT-
WHEREFORE, Defendant, THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND
NEW JERSEY (hereinafter “ PORT AUTHORITY” ) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Defendant, PORT AUTHORITY, with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,•;.y>;<Tfo& sw-y-'-i v - . j . .. j*.
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims defendant, PORT AUTHORITY are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs;
Dated: New York, New York
j
i >,i5
2ii i
iJ
i h
i
ii
L83! I S*: :x.
W' w4 !
t rJustin Siebei,Esq/WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
An L _SEGAL Me& MAHONEY, ivraAttorneys for Defendant ThePort Authority of New York and NewJersey850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
GESINGER !
;
i!
.
:
i
SO ORDERED, .
iHon. Manuel J. Mendez
FMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C .
0ram i
iAPR 11 2019 ;
!
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
i
:
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to: Index No: 118531/2002
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
ROBERT J. SHANSTROM and RITA M.SHANSTROM
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by
merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against AIR
& LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS
CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., are dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New York, 2019Dated:
Danny R. Kraft, Jr., Esqui,
Weitz & Luxenberg, PJ1700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003®
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
"KeitfijS. Babula, EsquireWIWBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS
.- prCORPORATION, as successor by merger to^ BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.
APR 11 Z019
COUNTY CLERK'S OC MEW YORK
SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .s.c.
APR o9 mBA8(T 13
- CIVIL i1—
1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to: Index No: 190082/2009
IRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
X
WHEREFORE, defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by
merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against AIR
& LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS
CORPORATION, as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., are dismissed with prejudice
and without costs., 2019Dated:
New York, New York
Danny R. Kraft, jr.,'%squi(re^/
x
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs
John Mowa. Babula, Esquire
WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMSCORPORATION, as successor by merger to
Kei
Wirt*
APR 11 2019^^PUFFALO PUMPS, INC.
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE _NEW YORK r \
APR 09 2019SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
PART 13
NYSSUWEHttourr
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S' Q: