focus awards level 2 award in understanding …...focus awards, silicon house, farfield park,...

Post on 02-Feb-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

601/6077/9

Qualification Specification

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Qualification Details 3

Qualification Purpose 3

Qualification Structure / Rules of Combination 3

Learner Entry Requirements 3

Age Ranges 3

Geographical Coverage 3

Reasonable Adjustments and Special Considerations 3

Assessment Methods 3

Progression Routes 4

Useful Websites and Supporting Materials 4

Links to National Occupational Standards 4

Appendix A: Units 5

Appendix B: Assessment Strategy 11

Appendix C: Assessment Best Practice 12

Appendix D: Guidance on observed assessments 16

Appendix E: Example Assessment Plan 18

Contents

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Qualification Details

QAN: xxx/xxxx/xGLH: 40Credit:5

Qualification Purpose

The Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding as Spectator Events qualification isaimedatlearnerswhowishtoworkasastewardintheActiveLeisure,LearningandWell-beingsector.Thismayincludeeventssuchassports,musicfestivals,concerts,paradesorcarnivals.Itcovershowtoprepareforevents,controlentryandexitofcustomers,identifyanddealwithcrowdproblemsandrespondtoemergencies.

Qualification Structure / Rules of Combination

Learnersmustcompleteall4 mandatory unitstotalling5 credits

UnitTitle Unit Ref Level Credit GLHMandatory unitHowstewards control the entry, exit andmovementofspectatorsatevents L/501/8956 2 2 15

Howstewardsmonitorcrowdsandrespondtopotentialcrowdproblemsatspectatorevents R/501/8957 2 1 10

Howstewardsprepareforspectatorevents Y/501/8958 2 1 10Howtorespondtoinjuries,illnessesandotheremergen-ciesinactiveleisureandlearning D/501/8959 2 1 5

Learner Entry Requirements

Therearenospecificentryrequirementsforthisqualification.

Age Ranges

Entryisatthediscretionofthecentre;howeverlearnersshouldbe16toundertakethisqualification.Geographical Coverage

ThisqualificationhasbeenaccreditedforuseinEnglandandNorthernIreland.

Reasonable Adjustments and Special Considerations

PleaserefertotheFocusAwards‘FocusAwardsReasonableAdjustmentsandSpecialConsiderationPolicy.’

Assessment Methods

TheFocusAwardsLevel2AwardinUnderstandingStewardingatSpectatorEventsisinternallyassessed.

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Each learner is required to createportfolioofevidencewhichdemonstratesachievementofall thelearningoutcomesandtheassessmentcriteriaassociatedwitheachunit.

Themainpiecesofevidencefortheportfoliocouldinclude:

• Assessorobservation–completedobservationalchecklistsonrelatedactionplans• Witnesstestimony• Learnerproduct• Worksheets• Assignments/projects/reports• Recordoforalandwrittenquestioning• Learnerandpeerreports• Recognitionofpriorlearning(RPL)

EvidencemaybedrawnfromactualorsimulatedsituationswhereappropriateandwherepermittedbytherelevantSectorSkillsCouncilorSectorSkillsBody.

SpecificassessmentrequirementslaiddownbySkilsActive canbefoundforeachunitinAppendix B.

Progression Routes

Learnerswishingtoprogressfromthisqualificationcanundertakethefollowingqualifications:

• Level2CertificateinUnderstandingStewardingatSpectatorEvents• Level2NVQCertificateinSpectatorSafety• Level3NVQCertificateinSpectatorSafety• Level4NVQCertificateinSpectatorSafetyManagement• LicencetoPracticequalificationse.g.DoorSupervisionorSecurityGuarding

Useful Websites and Supporting MaterialsYouwillfindusefulwebsitesandsupportingmaterialshere:

www.focusawards.org.uk/supportingmaterials www.skillsactive.comwww.ofqual.gov.uk

Links to National Occupational Standards

TheLevel2AwardinUnderstandingStewardingatSpectatorEventshasbeenmappedtoinsertNOSmaphere.

QCFUNITTITLE LINKTONOSMandatoryunitsHowstewardscontroltheentry,exitandmovementofspectatorsatevents

C210Controltheentry,exitandmovementofpeopleatspectatorevents

Howstewardsmonitorcrowdsandrespondtopo-tentialcrowdproblemsatspectatorevents

C211Monitorspectatorsanddealwithcrowdproblem

Howstewardsprepareforspectatorevents C29Prepareforspectatorevents

How to respond to injuries, illnesses and otheremergenciesinactiveleisureandlearning

C35Dealwithaccidentsandemergencies

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Appendix A: Units

Unit Title: Howstewardscontroltheentry,exitandmovementofspectatorsatevents

Unit No: L/501/8956Level: 2GLH: 15Credit: 2Unit details: Thisunitdevelopsthelearner’sknowledgeandunderstandingofhowtocontroltheentry,exitandmovementofspectatorsatevents,coveringrecognisingandrespondingtoillegalandprohibiteditems,helpingcustomerswiththeirproblemsanddealingwithchallengingcustomerbehaviourLearning OutcomeThe learner will:

Assessment Criterion The learner can:

1 Knowhowstewardscontroltheentry,exitandmovementofspectatorsatevents

1.1 Outlinethelegalrequirementsandpowerscoveringasteward’srighttorefuseentryandtheirrighttoasksomeonetoleaveavenue

1.2 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowwhenrefusingentryoraskingsomeonetoleave

1.3 Outlinewhystewardsshouldgiveexplanationswhentheyarerefusingentryoraskingsomeonetoleave

1.4 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowtosupervisespectatorentry

1.5 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowtocontrolqueues

1.6 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowtosupervisespectatormovementbetweendifferentareas

1.7 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstomonitortheirdesignatedareacarefully

1.8 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowtosupervisespectatorexit

2 Knowhowstewardsrecogniseandrespondtoillegalandprohibiteditemsatspectatorevents

2.1 Identifythetypesofillegalitemsthatspectatorsmaybringtoevents

2.2 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowwhentheyidentifyillegalitems

2.3 Identifythetypesofitemsthatmaybeprohibitedatdifferentvenuesandevents

2.4 Describetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowwhentheyidentifyprohibiteditems

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Unit Title: Howstewardscontroltheentry,exitandmovementofspectatorsatevents

3 Knowhowstewardshelpcustomerswiththeirproblemsatspectatorevents

3.1 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstoprovidehighstandardsofcustomercareatspectatorevents

3.2 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstotakeaccountofdiversityandequalitywhendealingwithcustomersatspectatorevents

3.3 Describehowstewardsshouldinteractwithcustomersatspectatorevents

3.4 Identifythetypesofinformationthatcustomersatspectatoreventsmayneed

3.5 Describehowstewardsshouldrespondtodifferentrequestsforinformation

3.6 Identifythetypesofproblemthatcustomersmayhaveatspectatorevents

3.7 Identifyhowstewardsshouldhelpcustomerswiththeirproblems

3.8 Identifythetypesofcustomerproblemsthatstewardsshouldrefertosomeoneelse

3.9 Outlinetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowforhandlingcomplaints

4 Knowhowstewardsdealwithchallengingcustomerbehaviouratspectatorevents

4.1 Recognisethetypesofsituationsthatmaycausechallengingcustomerbehaviouratspectatorevents

4.2 Statethelimitsofstewards’powersandresponsibilitieswhendealingwithchallengingbehaviour

4.3 Describehowstewardsshouldrespondtochallengingbehaviourandpreventitescalating

4.4 Identifythedifferencebetweenstewardsbeingassertiveandbeingaggressive

4.5 Identifywhenandhowstewardsshouldcallforassistanceandsupport

4.6 Outlinelegalconsiderationscoveringself-defenceandthereasonableuseofforce

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Unit Title: Howstewardsmonitorcrowdsandrespondtopotentialcrowdproblemsatspectatorevents

Unit No: R/501/8957Level: 2GLH: 10Credit: 1Unit details: Thisunitdevelopsthelearner’sknowledgeofworkingandunderstandingofhowtomonitorcrowdsandrespondtopotentialcrowdproblemsatspectatorevents,coveringrecognisingandrespondingtopotentialcrowdproblems,illegalandunsociablebehaviour.

Learning OutcomeThe learner will:

Assessment Criterion The learner can:

1 Knowhowstewardsrecogniseandrespondtopotentialcrowdproblemsatspectatorevents

1.1 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstomonitorforpotentialcrowdproblems

1.2 Describehowstewardsshouldmonitorforpotentialcrowdproblems

1.3 Identifythetypesofpotentialcrowdproblematspectatorevents

1.4 Statewhatstewardsshoulddowhentheyidentifypotentialcrowdproblems

1.5 Outlinetheproceduresstewardsareaskedtofollowinresponsetodifferenttypesofcrowdproblems

1.6 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstoremaincalmandfollowinstructionswhentherearepotentialcrowdproblems

1.7 Identifysituationsinwhichstewardsmayplacethemselvesandothersatriskwhentryingtorespondtopotentialcrowdproblems

1.8 Identifyhowstewardscanavoidplacingthemselvesandothersatriskwhentryingtorespondtopotentialcrowdproblems

2 Knowhowstewardsrecogniseandrespondtoillegalandunsociablebehaviouratspectatorevents

2.1 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstorecogniseandrespondtoillegalandunsociablebehaviour

2.2 Identifythetypesofillegalbehaviourthatmayoccuratspectatorevents

2.3 Outlinetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowwhentheyencounterillegalbehaviour

2.4 Identifythetypesofunsociablebehaviourthatmayoccuratspectatorevents

2.5 Outlinetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollowwhentheyencounterunsociablebehaviour

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Unit Title: HowstewardsprepareforspectatoreventsUnit No: Y/501/8958Level: 2GLH: 10Credit: 1Unit details: Thisunitdevelopsthelearner’sknowledgeandunderstandingofhowtoprepareforspectatorevents,coveringrolesandresponsibilities,preparingfordutiesandcheckingforandrespondingtohazards.Learning OutcomeThe learner will:

Assessment Criterion The learner can:

1 Understandtherolesandresponsibilitiesofstewardsandotherstaffatspectatorevents

1.1 Outlinetheimportanceofsafetyatspectatorevents

1.2 Describethecontributionthatstewardsmaketotheprovisionofsafetyandcustomerservice

1.3 Giveexamplesofdifferenttypesofeventsatwhichstewardingtakesplace

1.4 Identifythebasiclegalrequirementsforaspectatorevent

1.5 Identifythedifferentrolesandresponsibilitiesofstewardsataspectatorevent

1.6 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstoworktogetherasateam

1.7 Statethelegallimitationsofstewardsatspectatorevents

1.8 Listtherolesandresponsibilitiesofotherpeopleinvolvedinspectatorsafetyatanevent

1.9 Describehowtherolesandresponsibilitiesofotherpeoplerelatetothestewardingteam

1.10 Giveexamplesofguidancedocumentsonstewardingateventsandhowtoaccessthese

1.11 Outlinehowdifferentspectatoreventpoliciesandproceduresmayaffectthesteward’srole

1.12 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstocontinuetodevelopthemselvesintheirjobrole

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Unit Title: Howstewardsprepareforspectatorevents2 Knowhowstewardspreparefortheir

dutiesatspectatorevents2.1 Describeappropriatestandardsofappearance

forstewardsatspectatorevents2.2 Describeappropriatestandardsofbehaviour

forstewardsatspectatorevents2.3 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardsto

wearcorrectidentificationatalltimes2.4 Outlinethecontentofatypicalspectatorevent

safetyhandbook2.5 Outlinewhyregistration,briefingandpre-

eventroutinesareimportant2.6 Listthetypicalpre-eventroutinesthat

stewardscouldbeinvolvedin2.7 Identifytheresourcesstewardscouldreceive

atregistrationandbriefing2.8 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstolook

aftertheresourcestheyreceive2.9 Outlinetheproceduresstewardsshouldfollow

tochecktheirresourcesandreportfaults2.10 Outlinewhyitisimportantforstewardstotake

noteofinformationprovidedatbriefings2.11 Listthetypesofinformationstewardscouldbe

givenatabriefing3 Knowhowstewardscheckforand

respondtohazardsatspectatoreventvenues

3.1 Identifythefacilitiesinatypicalvenuethatastewardshouldknowthelocationof

3.2 Identifyandinterpretthesignageinatypicalvenue

3.3 Identifythetypesofhazardsthatmaybefoundatvenues

3.4 Outlinethetypicalproceduresforcheckingdifferentareasofavenueforhazards

3.5 Outlinetheproceduresthatstewardsshouldfollowwhentheyidentifyhazards

3.6 Outlinetheimportanceofstewardsfollowingprocedureswhentheyidentifyhazards

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Unit Title: Howtorespondtoinjuries,illnessesandotheremergenciesinactiveleisureandlearning

Unit No: D/501/8959Level: 2GLH: 5Credit: 1Unit details:

Learning OutcomeThe learner will:

Assessment Criterion The learner can:

1 Knowhowtorespondtoinjuriesandillnessesonafirstonscenebasis

1.1 Outlinewhyitisimportanttodealwithpeoplewhoareinjuredorillpromptly,calmlyandcorrectly

1.2 Identifythebroadtypesofinjuryandillnessthatmayoccur

1.3 Outlinehowtodealwithinjuriesandillnessesona‘firstonscene’basis

1.4 Statethetypesofinformationandsupportthatshouldbegiventoqualifiedassistance

1.5 Outlinewhyitisimportanttoreportaccidentsandincidents

1.6 Identifythetypicalproceduresforreportingaccidentsandincidents

2 Knowhowtofollowemergencyprocedures

2.1 Outlinewhyitisimportanttorespondtoemergenciespromptly,calmlyandcorrectly

2.2 Identifythetypesofemergencythatmayoccur2.3 Outlinetheproceduresforrespondingto

emergencies2.4 Identifythedifferentrolesandresponsibilities

ofpeopleinaworkplaceforeachtypeofemergency

2.5 Listthetypesofproblemsthatmayoccurduringemergencyprocedures

2.6 Outlinehowtorespondtoproblemsduringemergencyprocedures

2.7 Statewhyproblemswithemergencyproceduresshouldbereported

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Appendix B: Assessment Strategy

SkillsActive Assessment Strategy

How stewards control the entry, exit and movement of spectators at events

Learningoutcome3

Thelearnershouldknowhowtointeractwith:• Customersfromdifferentcultures• Customerswith a limitedunderstandingof thelanguagebeingusedatthevenue• Disabledpeople• VIPs• Mediarepresentatives

Thelearnershouldgiveexamplesofthefollowingtypesofproblemsthatcustomersmayexperienceandhowstewardsshoulddealwiththese:• Needforinformationandadvice• Ticketingproblems• Missingproperty• Illegal/unsociablebehaviourbyothers

Learningoutcome4

Thelearnershouldgiveexamplesofthefollowingtypesofbehaviour thatmaypreventchallengingbehaviourescalating:• Remainingcalm• Showingempathy• Communicatingclearly• Activelylistening• Usingappropriatebodylanguage• Respectingpersonalspace

How stewards monitor crowds and respond to potential crowd problems at spectator events

Learningoutcome1Thelearnershouldbeabletorecognisethefollow-ingtypesofpotentialcrowdproblems:• Unexpectedcrowdmovements• Localovercrowding• Overcapacity• Distress

• Separationofindividualsandgroups• Trespassintounauthorisedareas

The learner should outline the following proce-duresstewardsareaskedtocarryout:• Beingvisibletothecrowd• Warning/reassuringpeople• Containingacrowd• Removingpeopleandobjects

How stewards prepare for spectator events

Learningoutcome3Thelearnershouldgiveexamplesofthefollowingtypesofhazards:• Safetyhazards• Securityhazards• Firehazards• Hygienehazards• Emergencyequipmenthazards

Thelearnershoulddescribeprocedurestocheckthefollowingtypesofareas:• Confinedareas• Openareas• Publicareas• Non-publicareas

How to respond to injuries, illnesses and other emergencies in active leisure and learningLearningoutcome1Thelearnershouldgiveexamplesofthefollowingtypesofinjuriesandillnesses:• Minorinjuriesthatcanbedealtwithon-site• Minorillnessesthatcanbedealtwithon-site• Majorinjuriesrequiringmedicalattention• Majorillnessesrequiringmedicalattention

Thelearnerdescribesthefollowingwaysofdeal-ingwithinjuryandillnessonafirstonscenebasis:• Protectingpeoplefromfurtherharm• Providingcomfortandreassurance• Referringpeopletoqualifiedassistance• Callingforqualifiedassistance

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfi eld Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Appendix C: Assessment Best Practice

The assessment process

Theassessmentprocessisasystematicprocedurewhichshouldbefollowedtogivelearnersaposi-tiveexperience.Thiscanbeachievedbyfollowingtheassessmentcycle.Thecyclewillcontinueuntilallaspectsofthequalificationhavebeenachievedbyyourlearner(s).

Throughout the cycle, standardisation of assess-ment practice between assessors should takeplace;thiswillensureconsistencyandfairnessofdecisionsand thatall assessors interpret the re-quirementsinthesameway.InternalQualityAs-surancewillalsotakeplacethroughoutthecycleaspartofyourCentre’sinternalqualityassurancearrangements.

The assessment cycle

Initial assessment

The assessor must ascertain if the learner hasanypreviousknowledgeand/orexperienceofthesubject/topic/unit to be assessed. This informa-tion can be obtained through application forms,

interviewsorprofessionaldiscussions.Theresultsof the initial assessmentwill give youvital infor-mationregardingyourlearnerswhichyoumaybeabletousewithintheassessmentprocessforex-ample claiming exemptions, equivalences, credittransferorRecognitionofPriorLearning(RPL).Itwillalsogiveyouvitalinformationifyourlearnerrequiresfurthertrainingoranyadditionalsupporttheymayneed.Thisprocessmightnotalwaysbecarriedoutby the assessor, but the informationobtainedmustbepassedontotheassessorinor-derforthemtoeffectivemoveontothenextstageof theassessmentcycleandplanthe learneras-sessment. Initialassessment isknownasassess-mentforlearning,asithelpspreparelearnersforassessmentandidentifiestheirpotential.

Assessment planning

Assessment planning should be short and me-dium/long term, toallow forboth formativeandsummativeassessmenttotakeplace.Inclusionofyour learner(s) in the planning processwill helpidentifywhattheyhavelearnt,howandwhentheywillbeassessedandwillallowforcommunicationtotakeplacetoclarifyanypointsorconcerns.

Assessment activity

The assessor must use relevant methods, ap-proachesandactivities forexampleobservation,questioning, assignments or gathering appropri-ateevidenceofcompetence.Assessmentcanbeformative(usuallyongoingandtocheckprogress)and summative (usually at the end, that fullyachieves the assessment criteria and fully con-cludestheassessmentcycle).

Assessment decision and feedback

Theassessormakesajudgementofsuccessoroth-erwise,givingconstructivefeedbackandagreeingfurtheractionthatmaybenecessary.Recordsofwhatwasassessedandthedecisionsmadeshouldalwaysbemaintained.

Review of progress

The assessor reviews the progress and achieve-mentwiththelearner,discussinganyotherissues

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

thatmayberelevant to the learningandassess-mentprocess.Withinthissession,theassessorwillnaturallystarttheassessmentcycleagain,byiden-tifyingwhatisthenextstageintheassessmentofthequalification,howthelearnerwillachievethisandthenplanningtheassessment.

Recordsshouldbemaintainedthroughoutallas-pectsoftheassessmentcycleandinternalqualityassuranceactivitiesshouldtakeplaceonanongo-ingbasis.

Exemptions, equivalences, credit transfer and RPL

With the introductionof theQCF itnowenableslearners to avoidduplicationof learning andas-sessmentthroughequivalencesorexemptionsasfollows:

• ForachievementswithintheQCFitispossibletotransfercredit(equivalence)• Individuals with certificated achievements out-sidetheQCFcanclaimexemptionfromtherequire-menttoachievecreditsfordesignatedunits• Ifalearnerhaspreviouslyachievedthesameunitthroughanotherawardingorganisation,thiswillbeclassedasacredittransfer.• Inallthesecasesasthelearnerhasalreadyhadtheir achievement recognised, and will have re-ceivedacertificatetoconfirmthis,theirachievementtowardsthisspecificqualificationMUSTbeshownasanexemption,equivalenceorcredittransferandMUSTNOTbeallocatedanycreditachievement.

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) isamethodofassessment that considerswhethera learner candemonstrate that they canmeet the assessmentrequirements for a unit through knowledge, un-derstandingorskills theyalreadypossessanddonotneedtodevelopthroughacourseoflearning.Thereforethelearneriseitherawardedtheunitorcan progress straight to assessment without theneedfordelivery.Thiswillshowasaunitachieve-ment on the certificate. For any learnerwho haspreviouslyachievedunitsthathavebeenapprovedasExemptions,Equivalences,andCreditTransferorwillbeachievedthroughRPLitisyourresponsibilitytoinformFocusAwardsatregistration,throughtheuseoftheregistrationexcelspreadsheet.

Theclaimmustfirstofallbemade toyourCen-treanditisyourresponsibilitytomaketheinitialconsideration–ifyouareinanydoubtyoushouldrequest advice/clarification from Focus Awards.Upon authorising the request, youmust ensurethat appropriate evidence anddocumentation isreviewed,maintainedandmadeavailabletoFocusAwardsstaffasrequired.

Guidance for Tutors, Assessors and IQA’s

AllTutors,AssessorsandIQA’sshould:

• Possessadisciplinespecificqualificationequiva-lenttotheLevel2AwardinUnderstandingSteward-ingatSpectatorEvents(QCF)and;• DemonstrateactiveinvolvementinaprocessofindustryrelevantContinuedProfessionalDevelop-mentduringthelasttwoyears

Requirements of Tutors:

Tutorsshouldhold,orbeworkingtowardsateach-ingqualification.Thefollowingareacceptable:

• PreparingtoTeachintheLifelongLearningSector(PTLLS);• CertificatetoTeachintheLifelongLearningSec-tor(CTLLS);• DiplomatoTeachintheLifelongLearningSector(DTLLS);• Level3AwardinEducationandTraining;• Level4CertificateinEducationandTraining;• Level5DiplomainEducationandTraining.FocusAwardswillconsiderotherteachingqualificationsuponsubmission.

Tutorsmustalsobeabletoshowthefollowing:• Relevanttechnical/occupationalcompetencyinthedisciplines/unitstheywishtoteach.

Requirements of Assessors:

Assessorsshouldholdorbeworkingtowardsthefollowing:• D32/D33;• A1qualification;• Level 3 Award in Assessing Vocational Achieve-ment;

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

• Level 3 Award in AssessingCompetence in theWorkEnvironment;• Level 3 Certificate inAssessing Vocationally Re-latedAchievement;

Assessorsmustalsobeabletoshowthefollowing:• Relevanttechnical/occupationalcompetencyinthedisciplines/unitstheywishtoteach.

Please note that trainee assessors will requiretheirdecisions tobecountersignedbyasuitablyqualifiedassessor.

Requirements of Internal Quality Assurers (IQA):

IQA’s shouldholdorbeworking towardsoneofthefollowing:

• D34;• V1qualification;• Level4AwardintheInternalQualityAssuranceofAssessment.

Guided Learning Hours (GLH)

Theguided learninghoursfigure gives themini-mumamountoftimerequiredto‘deliver’thepro-gramme,andincludesalltimeswhenamemberofstaff ispresenttogivespecificguidancetowardslearning aims/outcomes, as well as other struc-turedlearningtimesuchasdirectedassignments,supportedindividualstudyorpracticeandassess-ment. Itdoesnot include timespenton learner-initiatedwork;ortimespentbytutorsmarkingas-signmentswherethelearnerisnotpresent.

Assessment

AssessmentpracticesmustreflecttheEqualityandDiversity Policy of FocusAwards and reasonableadjustmentsmayberequiredforindividuallearn-erstoenablethemtoundertakeassessmentsfair-ly.Pleaseseeourguidanceandtheproceduresforapplyingreasonableadjustments.Assessmentmustmeetfullyalllearningoutcomesandassessmentcriteriaasdescribedinthequalifi-cationspecification/assessmentstrategy;althoughthemethodofassessmentmaysometimesbead-justed to cater for learners requiring alternative

assessment methods. The qualification assess-ment strategyprovidesdetailedassessmentandevidencerequirements.

Consistency of assessment decisions

The consistency of assessment decisions, acrosslearners,sitesandassessors,isofprimaryimpor-tanceinassuringthequalityofassessmentwithinaCentre.FocusAwardsensuresthatthefollowingmechanismsareinplacetoassistthis:

• Assessorsarequalifiedorworkingtowardscur-rentassessorstandards;• Level 3 Award in Assessing Vocational Achieve-mentorLevel3AwardinAssessingCompetenceintheWorkEnvironment.Note:D32.33andA1isalsoacceptable;• Assessors have relevant subject competency intheunitstheywishtoassess;• Assessors are observed assessing by qualifiedIQA’satleastonceperyear;• StandardisationexercisesarecarriedoutwiththeCentre;• FocusAwardsissue‘AssessmentGuidance’docu-mentationforeachqualification;• CentretrainingdaysrunbyFocusAwardsincludeassessmentbestpractice;• ExternalqualityassuranceiscarriedoutatleasttwiceperyearineachCentrebytrainedandquali-fiedEQA’s.

Judging authenticity

• Assessors must ensure that the evidence pro-videdbylearnersisvalid,current,sufficient,reliableandauthentic;• Trainers/assessors should ensure that learnerssignadeclaration that theirwork is authentic i.e.their‘ownunaidedwork’;• Youmust implement aRecordofAchievementdocumenttorecordhowthelearningoutcomesandassessment criteriahasbeensufficiently covered.By ‘signingoff’ learners evidenceusing this docu-menttheassessorsand IQA’sareconfirmingthattheassessmentevidencesubmittedbythelearnerisauthenticandtheirownunaidedworkand it issufficienttomeetthestatedlearningoutcomesandassessmentcriteria;

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

• Wherethereissuspicionthattheworkmaynotbeauthentic,theassessorshouldcarryoutcheckstoascertainitsauthenticity.Forexample,oralques-tioning tocheck the learner’sknowledgematchestheevidenceprovided;• Evidence which is deemed to be inauthenticshouldnotbeaccepted.

Guidance on re-submission of learner as-sessment

• Thereisnolimittothenumberoftimesthatworkmayberesubmittedbythelearnerforassessment;• However, you may wish to operate your ownsystemsandpoliciesforadditionalsupport/advicewhichmaybegiventolearnerswhohavebeenun-successfulonanumberofoccasions;• Assessors/tutorsmay offer some assistance tolearners to learners in completing written work,suchasexplainingwhatthequestionsmeanorof-fering additional guidancewhen they have previ-ouslyansweredquestionsincorrectly,however,as-sessors/tutorsmustnotgivelearners,orleadthemto,thecorrectanswers;• Assessors/tutorsshouldnotaddtolearners’an-swersinworksheets,etc…wheretheydonotfullymeet the required standard. Rather the learnershouldbeaskedtoaddtotheiranswersthemselvesuntiltheydemonstratecompetence.

Use of language and stimulus materials

ItisyourresponsibilityasaCentretoprovideyourlearnerswithsuitableresourcesandassessmentmaterials to support them in their learning jour-ney.Resourcesandassessmentmaterialsandthelanguageusedwithintheseshouldbesuitableandappropriate to theirneeds.Theyareonlyappro-priateifthey:

• Enablelearnerstodemonstratetheirlevelofat-tainment;• Require knowledge, skills and understandingwhicharerequiredforthequalification;• Are clear and unambiguous (unless ambiguityformspartoftheassessment)and• Are not likely to cause unnecessary offence tolearners.

Theuseof thesematerialswillbe revieweddur-ingCentreEQAmonitoringvisitsandinconsider-ingwhether languageandstimulusmaterials forlearningandassessmentareappropriate,anEQAwilltakeintoaccountthefollowing:

• Theageoflearnerswhomayreasonablybeex-pectedtotakethequalification;• Thelevelofthequalification;• Theobjectiveofthequalification;• The knowledge, skills and understanding as-sessedforthequalification;• Itcontainslanguageorcontentwhichcouldleadagroupoflearnerswhoshareacommonattributeorcircumstancetoexperience–becauseofthatat-tributeor circumstance – anunreasonabledisad-vantageinthelevelofattainmentthattheyareabletodemonstrateintheassessment.

Pleasenotethatforthecreationofmanualsortextbooks, youmust showhoweachof the learningoutcomeshasbeencoveredand forassessmentmaterialsyoumustadoptanevidencereferencingsystemtoshowhoweachoftheassessmentcrite-riahasbeencovered.

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Appendix D: Guidance on ob-served assessments

Assessment briefing

When carrying out a planned observed assess-ment,itisessentialthattheassessorcarriesoutabriefingpriortotheassessment. Theassessmentbriefingshouldcoverthefollowinginformation:

• Wheretheassessmentwilltakeplace;• Howtheassessmentwillbeconducted;• Whatthestudentisexpectedtopresentintermsofperformanceevidence;• Anydocumentationwhichformspartoftheas-sessment;• Whenquestioningandfeedbackwilltakeplace;• Whattodoifthereisadisagreementwiththeas-sessmentdecision(appealsprocedure);• Theassessorshouldalsousethistimetoletstu-dents ask questions or seek clarification on any-thingrelatingtotheplannedassessment.  Othersinvolvedintheassessmentprocessshouldbepartoftheassessmentbriefing.

Theassessmentbriefingisusuallycarriedoutinagroupsituationandthentheassessorwillbrieflyconfirm the process with each individual beforetheassessmentcommences.

Observing the learner

Observationisthemainmethodofassessingprac-ticalcompetenceandinvolvestheassessorwatch-ingthestudentcarryouttheplannedtasks. Whencarryingoutanobservedassessment, theasses-sorshouldadheretothefollowingguidelines:

• Involvethestudent;• Completeanadequatebriefing;• Useanassessmentchecklist;• Ensuregoodobservationalpositionenablingyoutosee/hearappropriately;• Avoidbecominginvolvedintheassessmentproc-essexceptininstancesofhealthofsafetyorwhen‘movingon’;• When‘movingon’,sticktothephrase‘thankyou,canyoumoveontothenextexerciseplease’.Avoid

usingphrasessuchas‘that’sgreat’or‘welldone’–thiscouldgiveanindicationofperformance;• Ensuresufficienttimeisplannedtogiveimmedi-atefeedbackaftertheassessment;• Useamethodofrecordingtheobservationthatisasunobtrusiveaspossible. Rustlingpaperscanprovedisruptiveinaquietenvironmentwherepeo-pleareconcentratingonwhatisbeingassessed;• Beseentobeobserving,nevereat,talktootherpeople,textonamobilephoneoranyother suchactionwhichwilldistractfromyourobservation;• Avoid using positive/negative body language –thiscouldgiveanindicationofperformance.

Suggested stages of an observation for Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Under-standing Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Step 1InitialLearnerbriefing

Step 2DirectObservation

Step 3Learner/ClientFeedback

Step 4Learner Evaluation with client (15minutesmini-mum)

Step 5AssessorQuestions(openandnon-leading)

Step 6AssessorDecision(pass/refer)

Step 7AssessorFeedback(constructive,conciseandrel-evanttoperformancecriteria,writtenandverbal)

Questioning to Assess Knowledge and Understanding

• Itiseasyto inferalevelofunderstandingbywhatweseeduringobservationandsoitisessentialthatwequestionlearnersifweareeverindoubtaboutunderpinningknowledge;

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

• However,aquestionshouldnotbeaskediftheassessordoesnotseeaparticularPC.• Questionscanbedividedintotwocategories:

• Openquestionsstartwiththewords, ‘How?’,‘What?’, ‘When?’, ‘Where?’, ‘Why?’ and ‘Who?’ -thesewordsactaspromptstogivethestudentsthe opportunity to respond fully in their ownwords.• Closedquestionsenable the students to re-spondwithasimple ‘Yes’or ‘No’ response.Forexample, “Wouldyouask aparticipant tokeepthebackstraightwhenliftingweightsfromthefloor?”.

• Assessors should always use open questionswhenassessingunderpinningknowledge• Itis aFocusAwards requirementthatallquestionsasked during assessment are recorded togetherwithlearnerresponses. Thesemustbewrittenoutinfullandsignedanddatedbyboththelearnerandassessor.• It is unacceptable to write next to a question“learneranswered correctly”.  If therewasanap-pealagainstyourassessmentdecision,thenthereshouldbeaclearlyauditabletrailofevidencewhichshowsthequestionthatwasaskedandthelearnerresponse.

Non-Leading Questions

Assessorsshouldbecarefulnottousequestionsthatcould leadthe learnersbygivinghimorhera clue to the right answer.  They shouldalsobeawareofanypreferencesoropinionstheymightholdthatcouldaffectthewaytheyaskquestions. Itisjustaseasytoleadthelearnerbythetoneorinflectionofthevoiceorbysomefacialexpressionorbodymovement. 

Examplesofleadingquestionswouldbe:

• “YourparticipantseemedtobeoutofbreathontheCVsectionofyourworkout,doyouthinkyoucouldhavebroughttheintensitydownforher?” • “Arethedeltoidsworkedinabenchpressaswellasthepectoralsandtriceps?”

Feedback

‘Structuredinformationthatonepersonofferstoanother,aboutthe impactoftheiractionsorbe-haviour’.• Feedback following assessment should relatespecificallytowhathasbeenassessedandhowtheevidencepresentedmeets,ordoesnotfullymeetthecriteriabeingassessed. • Feedback should not include your opinion norshoulditbeacriticism.• Criticism is oneperson’s judgementof anotherperson, or theirwork.  Criticism is likely tomakesomeonefeeldevaluedorangry;anddoesnothingtoboostself-confidence.Itdoesnothelpapersontosolvetheproblem.Itshowsthatyoudismiss,re-jectordisapprove,andisunlikelytoleadtothere-sultyouintended.Youwillgetaresult-butitmaybeaworsesituationorabacklash.• Effectivefeedbackshouldbeatwowayprocess,involvingthelearneratalltimes. 

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Appendix E: Example Assessment Plan

Assessor name: Learner name: Date:

Date and timings of planned assessment

Unit/s and/or learning outcome/s to be assessed

What is to be assessed?Describe the activity or process you will observe or the product to be produced.

Assessment Method (Please see key below)

Date assessment completed

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Iconfirmthattheassessmentprocess,theactivityandevidencetobegeneratedhasbeenfullyexplainedtome:

SignedbyLearner:…...................................................

Date:…………………………………………………………………………

OQ-OralQuestioning,O–Observation,WT -WitnessTestimony,S -Simulation,PD -ProfessionalDiscussion,WQ-WrittenQuestions,A -Assignment/Project,WP-WorkProject,CS-CaseStudy,RA–ReflectiveAccount,RPL–Recognitionofpriorlearning

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Professional DiscussionLearner name:Assessor name:Date:Assessment criteria / topic of discussion:

Learner response:

Assessor signature: Date:Learners signature: Date:Internal quality assurer signature:

Date:

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Assessor Question SheetQualification:

Unit:

Assessor question Learner response Assessment criteria covered

Assessor signature: Date:Learners signature: Date:Internal quality assurer signature:

Date:

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Assessor Feedback SheetQualification:

Unit(s):

Performance criteria / assessment criteria

Assessor feedback

Assessor signature: Date:Learners signature: Date:Internal quality assurer signature:

Date:

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Learner Assessment Record

Evidence Date Achieved

Assessor signature

Learner Signature

Focus Awards, Silicon House, Farfield Park, Manvers, Rotherham, S63 5DB

Focus Awards Level 2 Award in Understanding Stewarding at Spectator Events (QCF)

Evidence Record Sheet

Qualification:

Unit:

Learning outcome

Evidence

I confirm that the evidence provided is a result of my own work:

Signatureoflearner:

Date:

I confirm that the learner has demonstrated competence by satisfying all of the learning outcomes and assessment criteria for this unit:

Signatureofassessor:

Date:

SignatureofIQA:

Date:

top related