ester line
Post on 03-Jun-2018
225 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
1/12
1
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
James Esterline
Abstract
With evidence for massive neutrinos and neutrino oscillations having recently been
established, neutrino physics beyond the Standard Model is of increasing interest. One proposedtreatment of the neutrino is that of a Majorana particle a particle that is its own antiparticle. As
a result of the violation of lepton number conservation that is necessary for a Majorana neutrinoto exist, phenomena such as neutrinoless double beta decay of atomic nuclei would be allowed.
The necessary theoretical modifications to the Standard Model to incorporate Majorananeutrinos, the outline of the calculational procedure of obtaining the neutrinoless double beta
decay half-life, and an overview of the planned experiment of the Majorana Collaboration toobserve the process will be presented.
Table of Contents
Theoretical Background:
Majorana ParticlesPg. 2
Modification to the Standard Model Due to Majorana NeutrinosPg. 3
Double Beta DecayPg. 4
Calculation of Decay Rates for Double Beta Decay Pg. 5
Candidate Nuclei for Double Beta DecayPg. 7
Experimental Measurement of Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay:Experimental Signatures of Double Beta Decay
Pg. 8Experimental Design the Majorana Experiment
Pg. 9Goals of the Majorana Experiment
Pg. 9
References: Pg. 10Appendix:
Pg. 11
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
2/12
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
3/12
3
Lorentz boost
Majorana: !L !R
CPT
Modifications to the Standard Model Due to Majorana Neutrinos
Before anything else need be considered, it is immediately obvious that lepton number
conservation is violated by the existence of Majorana neutrinos. In the current formulation of theStandard Model, the neutrino is assigned a lepton number of +1 and the antineutrino is assigned
a lepton number of -1, with a distinction being made between the three lepton flavors. Evidencein the form of neutrino oscillations has already shown that the flavor distinction in lepton number
is violated; the requirement that a neutrino be its own antiparticle would force neutrinos andantineutrinos to have lepton numbers of the same sign, and one can quickly conclude, by
examining beta decays (which would require charged leptons to carry lepton number opposite tothose of associated neutrinos) and other weak processes (muon decay, with the above
assumptions, would be necessarily neutrinoless), that the concept of conserved lepton number isno longer valid.
There is also the possibility, as will be examined in further detail, that right-handedinteractions need be introduced into the Standard Model electroweak Hamiltonian. To do this,
one merely parametrizes the inclusion of right-handed terms in the electroweak interaction(formulation for energies below the Wmass):
( ) ( )( ) ..2
chMMJMMJG
HRLRRLLW
++++= !!!
!!
! "#$
This differs from the Standard Model by the inclusion of right-handed lepton current JRand right-handed quark current MR(# in the above equation denotes four-vector notation);equivalently, it retrieves the Standard Model in the case where the dimensionless parameters $,%, and &are zero. Due to the observation that, if right-handed lepton currents are present at all inthe weak interaction, they are highly suppressed, the coefficients %and &are generally presumedvery small.
Note that a further modification arising from the inclusion of right-handed currents is the
existence of a right-handed Wboson, which presumably interacts much more weakly than its
left-handed counterpart. No deeper explanation of such a particle was to be found in theliterature, however.
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
4/12
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
5/12
5
The decay depicted above maintains the left-handedness of the weak interaction, but has
a helicity mismatch in the exchange of the Majorana neutrino. This is only possible if theneutrino is massive (as has been supported experimentally); in this case, the helicity of the
neutrino emitted at the first vertex contains a positive component proportional to the neutrinosmass divided by its energy, which, considering the energy available to double beta decays (on
the order of MeV), is a remarkably small, but nonzero, quantity.
Calculation of Decay Rates for Double Beta Decay
Fermis Golden Rule gives the second-order weak decay (that which proceeds via the
two-nucleon mechanism) to be2
,
2 !!"""#
#$
%&&'
("=
) *
)
)
+,-m emif
fiEEEE
iHmmHfEEd
where the sum over m represents the sum over the intermediate states of the virtual nucleus.
Despite the neutrinos nonvanishing mass, p!= E! is still a good approximation, and is used
henceforth.Substituting in for the weak HamiltonianH', which is the product of nuclear and leptonic
currents, we obtain
( )
2
,, ,
44cos8 ! !!
"""##$
%&&'
("=
))
*+ ,
*+*+
,
,,
-./0m nn emi
nnnn
f
ficF
e
ee
EpEE
JJiMmmMfEEGd
where the notation of [Boe87] has been used: M is the nuclear current, ne(!) is either 1 or 2
(labeling each emitted pair of leptons), and ne(!)is the complement of ne(!)(that is, 3 - ne(!)).
From this, we may extract the decay rate for the two-neutrino double beta decay, w 2!,
using the derivation in [Boe87]:
( )( ) ( ) ( )!!!
"""
"""#$%&
'(=
e
e
e
e
e
e
mE
m ee
EE
m eeee
mE
m eeee
CF dppEEEXpdEEpEZFdEEpEZFG 0100 2
1210
2
1222211117
44
2 ,,
8
cos))))
*
+,
whereE0is the decay energy of the double beta decay, and F(Z,E)is the Fermi function, which
provides the contribution to the decay of the electromagnetic interaction between the nucleus andemitted electrons.
e-
e-
"!e"p
p
Z
( Z+1)
Z+2
n
n
"!e"
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
6/12
6
The factor of X in the above expression contains all the nuclear matrix elements; it isgiven for 0
+!0
+decays (a good assumption, considering that all known double-beta-decaying
nuclei are even-even and hence both parent and daughter nuclei have ground states of 0+) in
[Boe87]; combined with the Primakoff-Rosen approximation:
( )!"
!
!"
Z
e
Z
p
EEZF
20 1
2lim,
#$
#
= ,
this results in an energy dependence of the form:
!!"
#$$%
&++++'19809092
1
4
0
3
0
2
007
02
EEEEE
()
The resulting half-life for two-neutrino beta decay is expressed as
( )[ ] ( )2
2
2
2
2
0
22
2/1 ,00 !!!!
F
A
V
GT Mg
gMZEGT "=# ++
where G2!is a lepton phase space factor, MGTandMFare the Gamow-Teller and Fermi matrix
elements, respectively, whose formulae are provided below:
!!!
+"
#=
++++
m fim
k
ikk
l
llf
GTMME
mmM
2/)(
002
$%$%
&
rr
!!!
+"=
++++
m fim
k
ik
l
lf
FMME
mm
M2/)(
002
##
$
where the summation over land kare over individual nucleons;(+and )are the nucleonicisospin raising operator and the nucleonic spin operator, respectively. [Hor02] notes that the
Fermi contribution can generally be eliminated, due to the restriction *T = 0 (that the nuclearisospin must not change) being invalidated by most double beta decays due to proceeding from
prohibited intermediate states.The calculation for neutrinoless double beta decay can proceed over either of the two
postulated channels presented in the previous section (that is, through the right-handedcomponent arising from the massiveness of the neutrino or through weak coupling to right-
handed particles).For the case where right-handed currents have not been added to the electroweak
Hamiltonian, the decay rate may be expressed as:
( )! "++=spins
eeifee pdpdMEEER 23
1
3
21
2
00 2 #$%
&&
whereR0nis the transition amplitude,Efis the energy of the daughter nucleus, andMiis the mass
of the parent nucleus.
Integration over lepton part of the amplitude is given by [Boe87], and yields a neutrinopotential Hn(r,Em), dependent in general on the energy of the intermediate nucleus Em, thatrepresents the propagator between the nucleons involved in the double beta decay. As argued for
in the mentioned source, the potential can be reasonably approximated as a 1/r central potential,roughly:
( ) jrmmn e
r
RErH !,
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
7/12
7
where R is the nuclear radius, and mjis the neutrino mass. It is noted that this expression isindependent of the energy of the intermediate nucleus.
With the addition of the parameters &and %(the effect of $on the decay rate is negligibleaccording to [Hor02]), the general expression for the inverse of the neutrinoless double betadecay half-life can be expressed as:
( )[ ] ( )
22
2
2
0
2
20
0
00
2/1 ,00
!!""!" !!"!""#
!
#
"
#
####
CCCm
mC
m
mC
mMg
gMZEGT
e
m
e
m
F
A
VGT
+++++
$=% ++
where the Cijare factors containing the nuclear matrix elements and phase space integrals, andG0!is the phase space integral for the neutrinoless decay.
In the case where right-handed currents are ignored, and the Primakoff-Rosenapproximation is used, G
0!is approximated by:
!
"
#$
%
&'++(
5
2
330
0
000E
EEG
)
It is noted that, since neutrinoless double beta decay has two fewer decay products, the
phase space factor is reduced by a factor of E06, making the neutrinoless mode a very accurate
probe for the measurement of the neutrino mass for low energy decays.
The nuclear matrix elements differ from those for the two neutrino decay only by theinclusion of the neutrino potentialHn(r,Em).
Candidate Nuclei for Double Beta Decay
The kinematics of double beta decay allow a vast number of prospective nuclides toundergo the process. The reaction
AZ!
A(Z+2) + 2e
-(+ 2"!e)
has as the only constraint that the nucleus with Z protons and (A-Z) neutrons (here denoted byAZ) have greater mass than the nucleus with Z+2 protons and (A+Z-2) neutrons (here denoted by
A(Z+2)) and two electron masses (and two neutrino masses, although this is too small to
discriminate between allowed and disallowed processes). Equivalently, neglecting atomicbinding energy, the atomic mass of the parent need exceed that of the daughter. It is noted that
any beta-decaying nucleus that is also the daughter of a beta-decaying nucleus enables its parentto decay to its daughter directly through double beta decay; however, this is in general not
interesting (only where the half-life for the original parent nucleus is sufficiently large undersingle beta decay does the contribution from double beta decay become non-negligible). Instead
of considering these relatively difficult-to-measure processes, the categories of double-beta-decaying isotopes is typically limited to those for which single beta decay is energetically
prohibited. There are relatively few of these nuclides, numbering about 26. Among the isotopeswith the highest decay energies and, hence, the highest decay rates based on available phase
space are48
Ca (decay energy 4.27 MeV),76
Ge (2.04 MeV),82
Se (3.00 MeV),96
Zr (3.35 MeV),100Mo (3.03 MeV), 110Pd (2.01 MeV), 116Cd (2.80 MeV), 124Sn (2.29 MeV), 130Te (2.53 MeV),136
Xe (2.48 MeV),148
Nd (1.93 MeV), and150
Nd (3.37 MeV). These are all the nuclides with
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
8/12
8
more than 1.75 MeV decay energy; of these, 48Ca and 96Zr are capable of decaying throughsingle beta decay [Boe87], but the associated half-lives are extremely low.
Experimental Measurement of Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
The phenomenon of double beta decay is understandably a difficult one to measure, dueto the extremely long half-lives for the decays. The added constraint that the measured decay be
neutrinoless (two-neutrino decays have been observed and are in the literature) complicatesmatters immensely. As shown in the previous section, neutrinoless double beta decays have
much larger half-lives, adding to the difficulty of obtaining a realistically detectable signal(additionally complicated by background and noise, as will be mentioned later). Furthermore,
the distinguishability of neutrinoless- and two-neutrino-double beta decays lies primarily in thesummed energy spectrum of the emitted electrons, and requires precise energy resolution. One
of the proposed experiments to measure neutrinoless double beta decay is the aptly namedMajorana Experiment, whose details follow below.
Experimental Signatures of Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
The most obvious indication of neutrinoless double beta decay would be a well-definedpeak in the summed electron energy spectrum corresponding to the exact value of the decay
energy. (Two-neutrino double beta decay would have a summed electron energy spectrumqualitatively similar to that of single beta decay: namely, a continuous energy distribution with
end-point energy extremely close to the decay energy, but without any peak in the electronenergy.) This difference between neutrinoless and two-neutrino energy spectra is due to the
absence of invisible neutrinos carrying away any of the decay energy, as they would whenpresent.
It is also conceivable to examine the excitation of the daughter nucleus to provide
evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay. This is due to the This is remarkably moredifficult in that, due to further limitations of phase space, the decay rate is again greatlydecreased, and also in that it is not direct evidence of neutrinoless double beta decay, as the
absence of neutrinos is not directly observed, as it is in the case of detecting electron energies.On the other hand, it is generally easier to detect the emitted de-excitation gamma rays,
especially if two or more are emitted in coincidence. As mentioned in [Tor04], however, the twotechniques observing the electron energy spectrum and the emitted de-excitation gamma rays
would provide positive identification for a decay event.It is worth noting that there has been a controversial claim to a measurement of a direct
observation of neutrinoless double beta decay in76
Ge by the Heidelberg-Moscow Experiment,with the half-life of the decay allegedly being measured to be 1.6+1025years [Kla01] (with an
estimated neutrino mass of about .39 eV. Since the methods of background subtraction appliedto the experimental data appear to be inadequate in determining a definite observation of
neutrinoless double beta decay, this result has been refuted, and a definitive measurement has yetto be reported.
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
9/12
9
Experimental Design the Majorana Experiment
There are numerous possible experimental apparatus and configurations thereof that canbe used to obtain a definitive measurement of neutrinoless double beta decay. I choose to detail
only one of them, that of the proposed Majorana Experiment.
The Majorana experiment consists of multiple phases designed to study and optimizeseveral experimental details, such as expected levels of background and detector configuration,culminating in the final phase of the experiment, which is expected to consist of an arrangement
of active high-purity Germanium detectors of total mass 120 kg (previously expected to be 500kg; the revised design will be capable of being extended).
The first of the two preliminary phases of the experiment is currently in operation atDuke University. This phase, the Segmented Enriched Germanium Array (SEGA) consists of a
segmented 1.2 kg high-purity Germanium detector enriched to 85% in 76Ge (the naturalabundance being 7.8%). The intent of SEGA is to evaluate the method of background reduction
proposed for the final phase of the Majorana experiment, namely, the use of a segmenteddetector to distinguish between single-site events corresponding to double beta decay
candidate signals (the distance the emitted electrons travel is at most a few millimeters) andmulti-site events, that is, the occurrence of signals in multiple segments of the detector atapproximately the same time generally associated with background. Pulse-shape discrimination,
a technique applied to distinguish between the types of particles generating the signal in thedetector, is also being evaluated. A schematic cut-away diagram of SEGA is included as Figure
1 in the Appendix.A further phase is also in development. Entitled the Multiple Enriched Germanium Array
(MEGA), it consists of 16 segmented high-purity Germanium detectors it is designed to furtherinvestigate the optimal detector configurations and background reduction techniques. Due to its
larger size and requirements for shielding, MEGA is a closer configurational approximation ofthe final Majorana Experiment. A schematic of the MEGA apparatus is presented as Figure 2 in
the Appendix.The Majorana experiment intends to make use of the ability of one of the Germanium
isotopes,76
Ge, to undergo double beta decay, enabling the massive detector array to servesimultaneously as the radioactive source. This is enabled by the proposal to enrich the desired
quantity of Germanium in76
Ge using existing facilities in Russia, which is purportedly the onlylocation with the appropriate equipment to enrich such a considerable amount of Germanium.
The Majorana phase of the experiment would occur underground, and be in all regardsother than size much like the MEGA experiment in design. The energy spectra would be
narrowly gated about the 2039 keV decay energy of 76Ge. A rendition of the proposedexperimental setup is shown in the Appendix as Figure 3.
Goals of the Majorana Experiment
The original goal of the Majorana Experiment in terms of data acquisition was to run fora period of 5 years with 500 kg of enriched Germanium (hence, have 2500 kg-years of
Germanium to measure). With the reduction of Germanium proposed for the commencement ofthe experiment to 120 kg (as the design has been altered to enable expansion of the detector after
data acquisition has started, this is not anticipated to be the amount of Germanium in theapparatus for the entire experiment), the original sensitivity to neutrino mass has been reduced
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
10/12
10
from 50 meV to at most 200 meV, with the focus now being on refuting the purported result ofHeidelberg-Moscow.
References
[Boe87] F. Boehm and P. Vogel. The Physics of Massive Neutrinos. Cambridge Univ.Press, Cambridge, 1987.
[Hor02] M. Hornish. Double Beta Decay of100
Mo and150
Nd to Excited Final States.
Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, 2002.
[Kla01] H. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, et al. Modern Phys. Lett. A, 37(2001), 2409.
[Tor04] W. Tornow, representing the Majorana Collaboration. Private communication inform of Majorana Experiment Draft Proposal.
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
11/12
11
Appendix
Figure 1: SEGAThis is a cut-away view of the SEGA detector, including lead shielding (at top) and
cryostat (the liquid nitrogen dewar for which is shown at the bottom of the figure). The actual
segmented Germanium crystal is the cylindrical gray object encased in the shielding. Source:http://www.wipp.ws/science/DBDecay/SEGAandMEGAdescription.pdf.
Figure 2: MEGA
-
8/12/2019 Ester Line
12/12
12
A cut-away diagram of the MEGA detector. Visible are the lead shielding and thecryostat. Source: http://www.wipp.ws/science/DBDecay/SEGAandMEGAdescription.pdf.
Figure 3: MajoranaA cut-away diagram of the proposed Majorana experiment (shielding not shown). The
highly enriched, high purity detectors are located in the center; dewars for the cryostat are shownat the sides. Source:
http://www.int.washington.edu/talks/WorkShops/Neutrino2000/WorkingGroups/Underground/DeBraeckeleer_L/ht/07.html
top related