doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax submission july 2014 slide 1 proposed calibration for mac simulator date:...
Post on 04-Jan-2016
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
July 2014
Slide 1
Proposed Calibration For MAC simulatorDate: 2014-07-12
Name Company Address Phone email Gwen Barriac Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Drive
San Diego
Simone Merlin Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego
George Cherian Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego
Authors:
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Introduction
• Multiple IEEE presentations have looked at the effects of CCA levels. – See next slide
– Many claim significant gain by increasing CCA levels.
– Numerous types of scenarios/simulators were used to make these claims– PHY simulator
– Real devices
– MAC simulator/scenario 3
• This presentation focuses on understanding the effect of changing CCA levels in a residential scenario ( scenario 1)
– Simulations are done with a MAC simulator• Detailed MAC modelled
• Simple PHY abstraction
– Optimal CCA levels for both mean and 5% TPUT are found for a variety of settings.
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 2
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Previous Contributions on CCA levels
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 3
Document # Company Title Notes11-14/0628r0 SK telecom measurements on CCA Thresholds in
OBSS environmentsincreasing CCA can help target APs overcome deferral due to ACI interference in dense setting. ( experimental results)
11-14/0578r0 Interdigital Residential Scenario CCA/TCPsimulation Discussion
Optimal CCA for mean TPUT varies with Txpower, and reuse.
11-14/0523r0 Orange MAC simulations results for Dynamic sensitivity Control ( CCA adaptation) and tranmist power control
CCA and TCP are strongly increasing reuse and aggregate throughput
11-14/0635r1 DSP Group Dynamic Sensitivity Control implementation
CCA level per STA depends on distance to AP.
11-14/0082r0 & 83r0 Bcom Improved Spatial Reuse Feasibility part I & II
2x-3x gains in both the mean and tail by increasing CCA levels.
Densifi: date: 2014-06-04
Bcom performacne Gains from CCA Optimiziation
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Simulation Setting I
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 4
• Residential Scenario– IEEE residential scenario
baseline• Less apartments modelled
for faster run times– Expect comclusions will
not change
• 1 STA per AP– 2x5x3 apartments– 30 APs ; 30STAs ; – Pathloss as specified in
11ax Simulation Scenarios document
– 1 80 MHz channel– Results averaged over
multiple random drops of APs and STAs locations
Floor 1
Floor 2
Example of one drop
Floor 3
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Simulation Setting II• Simulation Details:
– DL only Data traffic (+ UL BAs) – Full buffer UDP– Default Tx Power: 20 dBm per antenna (AP), 15 dBm ( STA) – Antenna Gain: 0 dBi APs, -2dBi STAs– Rate Control:
• MCS per link chosen to maximize long term goodput
– MAC modelling• MAC is fully modelled• Deferral according to 11ah CCA rules
– OBSS packets deferral only if RSSI > ED (assume BSS ID (color) in PPDU
• ED level controls deferral on a network level
• Nodes on the same 80 MHz channel have the same primary channel
– PHY modelling• Pathloss, shadowing, (pathloss as in SS document, shadowing w sd 5dB)• no fading. • Long term PER curves based on ChD• 1x1 (tx antennas x rx antennas)
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 5
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Tests Run
• Using ChD PER curves:– Reuse 1 default power levels
– Reuse 1, 6 dB higher tx power levels• 6 dB higher power models total power when 4 antennas
• Using AWGN PER curves:– Reuse 1 default power levels
– Reuse 1, 6dB higher tx power levels• 6 dB higher power models total power when 4 antennas.
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 6
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
RESULTS WITH CHD PER CURVES
July 2014
Gwen Barriac (Qualcomm)Slide 7
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
TPUT as a function of CCA for Reuse 1
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 8
• Optimal CCA for mean: -72
• Optimal CCA for 5% point: -92
CCA level 5 percentile 50 percentile 90 percentile mean
-52 0.00 10.85 103.30 35.25
-62 0.09 23.44 109.25 40.35
-72 1.27 30.32 107.2 45.63
-82 2.82 30.97 100.84 44.65
-92 4.50 24.54 74.98 33.08
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
TPUT as a function of CCA for Reuse 1, with 6 dB higher Tx Power at both AP and STA
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 9
• Optimal CCA for mean: -72
• Optimal CCA for 5% point: -82
CCA level 5 percentile 50 percentile 90 percentile mean
-52 0.01 8.66 105.55 34.61
-62 0.18 26.78 120.97 45.28
-72 2.34 31.27 109.50 46.43
-82 2.76 27.37 102.50 43.07
-92 1.78 23.91 61.06 29.79
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Possible Simultaneous mean & 5% TPUT
July 2014
Qualcomm Slide 10
CCA level 5 percentile 50 percentile 90 percentile mean
-52 0.00 10.85 103.30 35.25
-62 0.09 23.44 109.25 40.35
-72 1.27 30.32 107.2 45.63
-82 2.82 30.97 100.84 44.65
-92 4.50 24.54 74.98 33.08
CCA level 5% tput Loss compared to optimal
Mean tput loss compared to optimal
-92 0 26%
-82 37% 2%
-72 71% 0%
-62 99% 11%
-52 100% 22%
Reuse 1, default Tx Power , chD PER curves
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Summary of Results so far ( chD PER curves)
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 11
Reuse 1 default TX power
Reuse 1 6 dB Higher Tx power
Optimal CCA for mean -72 -72
Optimal CCA for 5% -92 -82
• For default power case, the optimal mean TPUT comes with a 70% loss
in 5% point. – It can be difficult to optimize for both mean and 5% point simultaneously.
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
RESULTS WITH AWGN PER CURVES
Note: Chan D curves better reflect reality. AWGN curves run for understanding of how simulator reacts in different settings.
Slide 12Qualcomm
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Reuse 1, Default TX power AWGN curves.
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 13
• Optimal CCA for mean: -62
• Optimal CCA for 5% point: -92
CCA level 5 percentile 50 percentile 90 percentile mean
-52 0.00 15.03 158.73 52.21
-62 0.00 30.09 170.16 62.05
-72 1.19 41.85 146.50 60.38
-82 4.67 40.63 116.73 53.21
-92 4.79 25.46 80.36 35.84
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Reuse 1, 6 dB higher Tx Power , AWGN curves
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 14
• Optimal CCA for mean: -62
• Optimal CCA for 5% point: -82
CCA level 5 percentile 50 percentile 90 percentile mean
-52 0.00 10.29 177.21 55.50
-62 0.21 36.59 169.71 64.05
-72 3.63 41.80 133.96 57.99
-82 4.49 33.44 107.61 47.54
-92 2.94 26.38 59.35 30.91
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Possible Simultaneous mean & 5% TPUT
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 15
Reuse 1, 6 dB higher Tx Power , AWGN curves
CCA level 5% tput Loss compared to optimal
Mean tput loss compared to optimal
-92 34% 51%
-82 0 % 26%
-72 19% 11%
-62 95% 0%
-52 100% 14%
CCA level 5 percentile 50 percentile 90 percentile mean
-52 0.00 10.29 177.21 55.50
-62 0.21 36.59 169.71 64.05
-72 3.63 41.80 133.96 57.99
-82 4.49 33.44 107.61 47.54
-92 2.94 26.38 59.35 30.91
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Summary of Results w/ AWGN
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 16
Reuse 1 default TX power
Reuse 1 6 dB Higher Tx power
Optimal CCA for mean -62 -62
Optimal CCA for 5% -92 -82
• Difficult to optimize for both mean and 5% point simultaneously.– Optimal mean can come with 95% loss in 5% point
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Comparison of Optimal CCA levels for AWGN and Chan D PER curves
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 17
Reuse 1 default TX powerChannel D PER curves
Reuse 1 6 dB Higher Tx powerChannel D PER curves
Reuse 1 default TX powerAWGN curves
Reuse 1 6 dB higher TX powerAWGN curves
Optimal CCA for mean
-72 -72 -62 -62
Optimal CCA for 5%
-92 -82 -92 -82
• Changing PER curves has large effect on optimal CCA level for mean• Changing Power level also affects optimal CCA • Optimal CCA level sensitive to parameters.
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Conclusions:
• Optimal CCA levels are highly dependent on parameter settings– example, Tx Power, PER curves
• Difficult to get simultaneously optimize both mean and 5% point
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 18
doc.: 11-14-0846-00-00ax
Submission
Additional Considerations
• We would like to propose that the rate control used in these studies be included in the EM document for use with the MAC simulator and integrated simulator. – See document xxxxx
• We would also like to propose that the deferral method used in these studies be used for the next stage of MAC simulator calibration.
July 2014
Barriac et al (Qualcomm)Slide 19
top related