concept plan 130212final
Post on 04-Apr-2018
229 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
1/33
February 7, 2013DPD # 3012953
Swedish Medical Center Concept PlanCherry Hill Campus
Major Institution Master Plan Application
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
2/33
Swedish Medical CenterCherry Hill Campus500 17th AveSeattle, Washington 98122
www.swedish.org cCallison 2013
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
3/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #30129531
Table Of Contents
1. Introduction and Swedish Medical Center Mission
2. SMC Cherry Hill Campus Goals and Needs3. Campus Vicinity and Existing Conditions4. Site Plan with Proposed Institutional Boundaries5. Planned Development, Planned Uses & Alternates6. Street Vacations7. Planned Parking Development and Access8. Neighborhood Uses and Character
9. Neighborhood Planning Precepts10. Appendix
Contact
Marcia PetersonDirector of StrategySwedish Health Services747 BroadwaySeattle, Washington 98122
Tele 206.628.2525Email: marcia.peterson@swedish.org
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
4/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
I. Introduction
Swedish Medical Center Cherry HillCampus (Swedish) intends to prepare anew major institution master plan (MIMP)for its Cherry Hill campus, consistent with
all applicable City of Seattle requirements.
A Notice of Intent was submitted to theCity Department of Planning and Develop-ment (DPD) on November 21, 2011.Swedish has worked with the Departmentof Neighborhoods (DON) to assist with theformation of a new Citizens Advisory Com-mittee (CAC). It has been approved by theSeattle City Council and convened.
The Concept Plan is intended to be sub-mitted to DPD on/ or around the rst of
February 2013.
Swedishs prior master plan for the CherryHill Campus was adopted by Ordinance117238 on August 2, 1994 allowing devel-opment of up to 564,000 square feet ofnet new construction over a fteen year
period, expiring in 2009.
Development rights for 238,032 squarefeet remained at the expiration of thisMIMP.
Three minor amendments were made tothe 1994 MIMP:- to modify a setback for a parkinggarage (2006);- to increase the height and bulk toaccommodate the NW KidneyCenter (2007)- to extend the expiration date of theMIMP for two years until August,2011 (2008).
The MIMP is created to guide develop-ment for long time horizons: fteen
twenty-ve years and more. This Concept
Plan includes descriptions of proposedand possible development strategies,and denes the envelope within which
the institution may seek to develop futureprojects.
The concepts will be further rened during
the upcoming planning process. Swedishlooks forward to working together with theCity and the community to efciently com-plete the new master plan that will supportthe organizations Strategic Plan.
2
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
5/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Swedish Medical Center Mission
For more than a century, Swedish hasbeen at the forefront of technology and in-novation, providing world-class healthcareto those who live and work in Seattle andthe surrounding Puget Sound region.
Swedish was founded in 1910 by Dr. NilsJohanson, a surgeon and Swedish immi-grant who brought together doctors andnurses who shared his passion for beingon the leading edge of medical practiceand patient care. Dr. Johansons legacyof constant innovation and compassion-ate care continues today. Swedish is
recognized nationally for the safety andquality of the care it delivers to more than100,000 patients each year.
True to the intent of its founder, Swed-ish has been dedicated to being the bestcommunity partner possible. It does thisby providing a wide range of communitybenets, strategies and solutions that
meet peoples healthcare needs. Thatmeans covering the cost of medical carefor those who cant pay, offering freehealth screenings, assisting patients withtheir rent in times of healthcare crisis, andsupporting research projects that help tocreate valuable medical advances, bothhere at home and across the world. In2012, Swedishs community benets and
uncompensated care, totaled more than$140 million.
Today, Swedish continues as a non-prot
healthcare System, and is now comprisedof ve hospitals, two ambulatory care cen-ters, and over 108 medical clinics serv-ing patients and communities across the
Western Washington region.
The Cherry Hill campus was formerly theagship hospital of the Sisters of Provi-dence, with several of the buildings datingback to 1910. In the year 2000, Swedishacquired the campus and changed its pur-pose from a general community medicalcenter to a specialized regional medical
center focused on cardiovascular andneuroscience services. Now the home ofthe Swedish Heart and Vascular Instituteand the Swedish Neurosciences Institute,these programs have grown into regionaland national referral centers for patientsseeking care for treatment of some of themost complex heart, vascular and neuro-logical diseases. In 2002, Swedish sold
40% of the campus, including most of thebuildings that provide outpatient servicesand house our physician ofces to the
Sabey Corporation. Since then, the Sabeyand Swedish partnership has investedover $100 million in capital improvementsto build a world-class center for theresearch and treatment of cardiac andneurological diseases at Cherry Hill.
3
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
6/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Some of the services provided at the
campus include:
Emergency Services
Multiple Sclerosis Center
Cardiovascular Wellness Services
Heart & Vascular Institute
Clinical Research Program
Neuroscience Institute
Rehabilitation Services
Telehealth Center
Ivy Brain Tumor Center
Radiosurgery Center
Inpatient Psychiatric Center
In addition, there are a number of public
amenities on the campus:
Cafeteria
Starbucks
Inn at Cherry Hill
Public Meeting Spaces
Patient/Education Kiosks
Community Pharmacy
Retail
Chapel/ Reection Room Access to information about Public
Transportation Routes
James Tower, one of the original buildingson the campus. This building was renovat-ed in 2003 to become a state-of-the-artmedical ofce building and now houses
physician ofces, education, and research
facilities.
The West Tower, built in 1964 for inpa-tients now houses outpatient hospital-related services including physical andoccupational therapy, and the Cherry HillInn, a low-cost temporary housing optionfor families of patients undergoing surgeryand treatment at the facility.
In 1978 the Central Building was added,
and now includes the state of the art oper-ating rooms, imaging services, and inten-sive care units for both the Neuro andCardiac units (expansion and remodelin 2008 as part of the Center BuildingPlaza project).
The East Tower was opened in 1989 and,along with the ICU units, is the only build-ing on the campus where patient beds arestill operating.
The Cherry Hill Professional Building andJefferson Tower house outpatient servicesincluding Advanced Imaging (MRI/CT),
physician ofces, ambulatory surgery, and
the MS Center.
A parking garage is located on the west
side of the campus, and an undergroundparking structure is located beneath the
Building Resources
The Cherry Hill campus includes the 1910
4
2. SMC Cherry Hill Campus
Goals & Needs
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
7/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
front entrance (added in 2008 with CenterBuilding Plaza expansion).
Drivers of Campus Growth
Growth at the campus is constrained bythe campus boundaries and by the fact
that there is no space on the campus toplace a new building without demolishingan existing, still functioning building.
At some point in the foreseeable future,the inpatient facilities will require replace-ment and possibly, expansion. In addition,the increasing demand for space foroutpatient services, research space andeducational facilities will require additional
facilities to be built. A number of externalfactors are driving the need for replace-ment and expansion of the facilities, in-cluding the following:
1. Healthcare Reform-The Patient Protection and AffordableCare Act will likely result in an increasedvolume of patients to the campus starting
in 2014 as over half a million previouslyuninsured residents of Washington statebecome insured through the expansionof Medicaid and the establishment of theExchanges under the Act.
2. Technological &
Patient Care Changes
Innovations in healthcare techniques,such as the use of robots in surgery,
require larger operating rooms. In addi-tion, market demands, health care regu-lations and building code requirementstend to require signicantly larger patient
rooms than in previous years. Conse-quently, future replacement of a patienttower would likely result in a larger foot-print for the same number of beds.
3. Regional Growth
The Puget Sound region in general hasseen signicant population growth in the
last 20 years, a trend that is now increas-ing within Seattles Center City. Thisgrowing local and regional population willplace a greater demand on the services
offered at Cherry Hill, imposing require-ments for growth of campus services.
4. Population Aging
The aging of the baby boom cohort willresult in an increased need for specialtyservices of the type offered at the CherryHill campus, particularly cardiac and neu-rological care. We are forecasting a need
for growth and expansion based on thecampus regional referral status in thesespecialty areas.
5. Cost Pressures
Given all of these pressures, healthcareproviders will be challenged to continueto provide quality care to the additionalpeople seeking care at a cost that is af-fordable and sustainable. Swedish will be
5
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
8/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
looking to reduce the cost of care throughefciency and cutting out waste. Replace-ment and remodeling of older, inefcient
buildings can be required to obtain theseefciency gains and to ensure the optimal
use of resources. We will need to improveour efciencies around the management
of supply costs, one of the highest costsof healthcare. Our current campus con-guration is inefcient.
6. Consolidation of Services
In 2012 Swedish entered into an afliation
agreement with Providence Health Servic-es to provide better, more affordable careto the residents of western Washington.
Planning is underway to consolidate andcoordinate services where appropriatein order to avoid the costly duplication ofservices. Swedish, with its advancedtreatment facilities located in DowntownSeattle, is well positioned to become theRegional Referral Center for the Provi-dence Health System.
7. Safety & Quality Over ten years ago a movement startedin the healthcare industry to focus onimprovements in patient safety and qual-ity care based on research. Studies of thephysical environment show that safetyand quality issues are impacted by facil-ity strategies. Specically, reductions in
medical errors, reduced hospital acquiredinfections, and decreased staff stress andfatigue levels can be linked to facility
design. Studies also show that facilitydesign can promote patient healing, re-duce the need for pain medications, andshorten the length of stay in the hospital.The development of new and replacementfacilities at Cherry Hill will need to focuson this approach.
8. Outpatient Care Requirements
Outpatient services and related long termand post-acute services are increasinglyimportant for the coordination of clinicalcare and Cherry Hill is currently limited inits ability to grow these types of services.
9. Research & Education
Our vision calls for increasing the re-search and educational capabilities of theCherry Hill campus and for collaborationwith Seattle University around clinicaleducation, particularly in nursing.
10. Required Facility Upgrades Thecurrent campus footprint has reachedits capacity limiting our ability to provideadditional services to meet the growth
needs. We will need to expand and re-place our inpatient beds in order to meetthe needs of the population, improve ourefciency, and maintain our state of the
art services for the region. Upgradinghospital facilities to meet seismic require-ments is of special concern in theSeattle area as it sits on a signicant fault
line and may be at risk in the event of an
earthquake. Capacity of the central utility
6
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
9/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
plant is also at its current limits. In thefuture; the upgrading, replacing and ex-panding of the central plant and utilities isneeded as new square footage is addedto the campus. Sustainable building isa desirable aspect of any new buildingproject. The growth of healthcare throughsustainable practices is essential for thefuture of the campus.
11. Programmatic Needs
As explained, Swedish Medical Centerhas established the Cherry Hill Campusas its location for its Cardiac & Vascularand Neuro specialties. The acclaimedSwedish Neuroscience Institute (SNI)
provides advanced, progressive treat-ment for a wide range of brain, spine andcentral nervous system conditions. It hasbuilt a roster of world-class neurologistsand neurosurgeons and leading-edgefacilities including the most technologicallyadvanced operating rooms and services.Swedish serves patients outside the areawith TeleHealth access and conducts phy-
sician and surgeon education in the latestnoninvasive medical techniques using thebroadcasting capabilities established onthe campus. A specially-trained InpatientNeurology Team provides a high level ofcare and compassion focused on improv-ing outcomes and renewing hope.
Read more: http://www.swedish.org/
Services/Neuroscience-Institute#axzz2JONXwWWF
Among these drivers, some may be moreimportant over the next 20 years andsome may be less so. We do not assumethat all of these drivers will simultaneouslydictate maximum growth at the CherryHill campus. But the aggregate effect ofthese drivers will be to require substantialincreases in campus development overthe next two decades. This conceptualplan assumes two new development al-ternatives: a concentrated alternative anda dispersed alternative (both at 1.8 mil-
lion additional s.f., for a total of 3.0 millions.f. gross building area). Neither of thesealternatives would provide adequate newspace to satisfy all the possible needsidentied above; but assuming that the
20-year horizon includes growth based onsome but not all of these drivers, thetwo alternatives provide cases that maybe adequate to address the long-term
needs of the campus.
7
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
10/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Cherry
Hill
Professional
Building(1975)
West
Tower(1964, 66) East
Tower(1989)
NW Kidney
Center(2009)
West
Parking
Garage(1977, 81)
West
ParkingGarage
Expansion(2009)
Jefferson
Tower(1987)
Center
Building(1978, 2008)
Plaza
(2008)
James Tower
(1910, 2005)
Boiler
Building(1909)
Annex(1940)
Surgery
Addition(1977)
E Cherry St.
E Jefferson St.15thAve.
16thAve.
18thAve.
(Dates of primary construction)
Figure 1
Existing Cherry Hill Campus
8
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
11/33
v
v
v
v
v
Spruce St.
Mini Park
Firehouse
Mini Park
Spring St.
Mini Park
v
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
The context of SMC Cherry Hill is depicted inFigure 2. The CH Campus is located at the eastedge of First Hill, specically within the Squire
Park Neighborhood. It is located is within a halfmile of a number of other major institutions and
campuses including SMC First Hill, UW/ Harbor-view Medical Center, Seattle University, KingCounty Juvenile Detention Center, and Gareld
High School.
The existing SMC CH Campus is dened by
the two arterials of East Cherry St. as the northboundary and East Jefferson St. as the southernboundary. 15th Avenue and the back of SUathletic buildings are the west boundary. The
mid-block between 18th and 19th Avenues is theeastern boundary.
UW / HarborviewMedical Center
Campus
SwedishMedical
CenterFirst Hill Campus
Seattle
UniversityCampus
Gareld Hig
School Camp
Swedish Medical
Center
Cherry Hill Campus
2,500
feet
3 Minute
Walk
1/4Mile
(1,320feet)
King County
Juvenile DetentionCenterCampus
Figure 2
Vicinity Map
3. Campus Vicinity & Existing Conditions
9
Seattle Street Car
Primarily Single
Family Residences
Primarily Single
Family Residences
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neighborhood
Commercial
Neighborhood
Commercial
Douglass-Truth
Public Library
Langston Hughes
Performing Arts
Center
Bailey Gatzert
Elementary School
Horiuchi
Park
Pratt Park
ODea
High School
Lake Wash.
Girls Middle
School
Seattle
Univ.
Park
Seattle
Univ.
Athletic
Fields
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
12/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
105
303030 30
30 30
30 30
3030
30 30 30 30
30
65 65 37
40
25 25252525
East Jefferson St.
15thAve.
16thAve.
17thAve.
14thAve.
18thAve.
19thAve.
East Cherry St.
Figure 3
1994 Approved MIO ZoningMaximum Allowable Heights
Legend
MIO-65
MIO-37
MIO-105
NC2-40
NC1-30
L-1
L-3
SF-5000
10
Underlying Zoning is
L-3 & SF-5000 within
the MIO Boundary
E Existing Skybridge
E
Current MIMP Boundary
Site Area w/in Boundary: 577,204 SF
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
13/33
Legend
MIO-65
MIO-37
MIO-105
NC2-40
NC1-30
L-1
L-3
SF-5000
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 4
1994 Approved MIMP Envelope
Approved Building Area: 1.3 Million SF / Used 1.2 Million SF
Approved Parking: 1,725 Spaces / Used 1,560 Spaces
FAR: 2.3
Site Area: 550,600 SF
11
30
37
6530
105
30
30
16th
Ave
.
18th
Ave.
E.Cher
E.JeffersonSt.
30
65
15th
Ave
.
30
30
17th
Ave
.
30
30
30
30
The colored blocks represent a potential zon-ing envelope and not building mass or shape.
Actual future buildings must be contained withinthe volumes and represent a smaller mass of theoverall zone because of setbacks, modulations,FAR and programmatic requirements.
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
14/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Ownership by Building
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER
SABEY CORPORATION
OTHER OWNERS
12
Figure 5
Campus Ownership 3D View
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
15/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
East Jefferson St.
15thAve.
16thAve.
18thAve.
East Cherry St.
Ownership by Lot
Ownership of the existing MIO Boundary is pri-marily SMC & Sabey Corp. The Carmack homeat 16th & E. Jefferson and the Seattle Medical &
Rehabilitation is under other ownership.
Figure 6
Campus Ownership Site Plan
13
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
16/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #301295314
The Seattle Land Use Code requiresmajor institutions to have a MIMP in placeso they can accommodate appropriategrowth and changing needs of the majorinstitution. The city encourages concen-
tration of growth and development onexisting campuses, but like all inner cityhospitals the dilemma is how to evolvewith limited room to shift spaces withoutdisrupting service.
The focus of this Master Plan is to:
1. Anticipate future space needs basedon the wide range of growth drivers notedearlier in the concept plan, various op-portunities and growth of the primary coreservices and support services for the nexttwenty years.
2. Identify Buildings:- which are positioned well for anticipated
future needs.- which will need to be re-purposed for
future needs.- which need to be replaced with new
buildings for future needs.- which sites for future building are
needed.
3. Provide exibility for good medical cam-pus planning principles.- Identiable entries, easy access to
parking- Intuitive waynding- Separation of ows (public & back-of-
house)- Service Zoning (in-patient & out-patients)- Operational efciency
- Flexible Futures- Brand Consistency
The campus is encumbered with agingand compromised buildings that will notmeet modern healthcare needs in thefuture. A strategy of creating an emptychair into which particular functions could
move during demolition and constructionof new projects is needed. The currentCherry Hill core functions are centeredaround the existing operating theaterwhich is one of the newest sections ofthe hospital, thus the functional core mustremain tied closely to its current location.The only empty chair (site not encum-bered by operational buildings) that exists
today within the current boundaries is thehalf block on 18th Ave. The narrow widthof the half block limits its efciency as a
site for medically related buildings as theinstitution develops.
The proposed boundary adjustments inthis conceptual plan look at what functionis needed and where it is best located tocreate an optimal arrangement for the fu-
ture operations of the Cherry Hill Campusand the neighborhood.
Expansion into adjacent blocks currentlyoutside the MIMP would help accomplish:
- appropriate buffers and transitions tosurrounding properties.
- the provision of various opportunities for
future exibility.- placement of medical services in betterlocations to support a well-functioning campus.
- the empty chair for transitional growth
4. Site Plan with Proposed Institutional Boundaries
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
17/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
st Jefferson St.
15th
Ave.
16th
Ave.
18th
Ave.
East Cherry St.
17th
Ave.
19th
Ave.
Figure 7
Potential Boundary
Adjustments
Spencer
Technologies
Site is currently
Medical Ofce
Space owned
by Sabey
South Block
Opportunities
15
North Block
Opportunities
East
Block
Opportunities
Existing Site Boundary
The different boundary expansions allow for
different opportunities as properties become
available.
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
18/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Alternate 1 - No Action: (Figures 8, 9)
- Maintains existing campus MIO boundaries & height limits
- No logical growth opportunities- Minor vertical growth- FAR limits further growth
- Restricts operational improvements
Alternate 2 - Concentrated Option
Increase vertical capacity to MIO 90 - MIO 200: (Figures 10, 11)
- Allows adequate vertical growth capabilities & concentrates growth- Creates greater height transitions to neighboring properties
- Limited boundary expansion to Spencer Technologies Site (currently MOB)- Increases FAR to amount needed for identied drivers
- Improve internal connections & circulation- Future exibility
Alternate 3 - Dispersed Option
Increase vertical to MIO 37 - MIO 200 & expand boundary: (Figures 12, 13)- Allows adequate vertical growth capabilities & concentrates growth w/ stepped
approach
- Creates more steps in height transitions to neighboring properties- Potential boundary expansion to neighboring blocks- Increases FAR to amount needed for identied drivers
- Development density is dispersed over campus / room for additional open spaces- Improve internal connections & circulation- Future exibility
5. Planned Development, Planned Uses & Alternate Proposals
16
The proposed MIO boundaries, heightdistricts and underlying zoning are shownas three alternates in Figures 8 through13. The strategies all look to place theappropriate hospital functions around the
current operating theater and existing corefunctions. The goal is to maintain some ofthe current envelope heights where appro-priate and place new, higher vertical en-velopes toward the center of campus anddown hill toward Seattle University,
thereby concentrating development inthe center of campus and stepping theheights down toward the edges as a tran-sition to the surrounding properties.The objective of the MIMP is to increase
exibility as the medical center plans forthe future while accommodating bestmedical practices and the needs of theneighborhood.
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
19/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Alternate 1 - No Action:
Alternate 1 would:
- Maintain existing campus MIOboundaries and street right-of-ways.
- Severely limit the future growth andcontinued modernization of the campus.
- Would increase costs of future remodel-ling by restricting the ability to demolishand replace obsolete structures. Re-
modelling of units also would have to oc-cur while continuing to operate the samedepartment.
- Very limited growth could only occur withan increase of the FAR & increase build-ing heights to current maximum heights(only limited potential).
Alternate 2 - Concentrated Option:
Alternate 2 would:
-Provide exible capacity for future build-
ing expansion.
-Have limited boundary expansion to theSpencer Technologies property.
- Expand vertical capacity from MIO 37,65, 105 to MIO 90, 105, 200.
- Addition of approximately 1.8 millionGSF of building area, for a total of approx-
imately 3 million GSF.
17
- Addition of approximately 3,000 parkingstalls, for a total of approximately 4,500stalls.
- Street vacations of 16th Avenue and18th Avenue.
Alternate 3 - Dispersed Option:
Alternate 3 would:
-Provide exible capacity for future build-ing expansion.
-Have potential MIO boundary expansionto some blocks north, eastern half block of18/19th and/or some south blocks. Po-
tential expansion to surrounding adjacentblocks only as properties become avail-able to purchase by Swedish or Sabey.
- Expand vertical capacity from L-3. SF-5000, MIO 37, 65, 105 to MIO 37, 50,65, 90, 105, 160, 200.
- Addition of approximately 1.8 millionGSF of building area, for a total of approx-
imately 3 million GSF.
- Addition of approximately 3,000 parkingstalls, for a total of approximately 4,500stalls.
- Street vacations of 16th Avenue and18th Avenue.
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
20/33
Legend
MIO-65
MIO-37
MIO-105
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
37
65
105
16th
Ave
.
18th
Ave.
E.Cherry
E.JeffersonSt.
Figure 8
Alternate #1 - 3D Zoning Envelope Diagram
- NO EXPANSION OF ZONING HEIGHT LIMITS
(MIO 37, MIO 65, MIO 105)
- LIMITED AVAILABLE CAPACITY FOR
BUILDING EXPANSION
- MAINTAIN EXISTING MIO BOUNDARY
- NO STREET VACATIONS
Alternate #1 - No Action
Total Structure Area: 1.6 Million SF
Gross Building Area: 1.2 Million SF
Parking: 1,560 Spaces
Site Area: 577,204 SF
FAR: 2.3
17thA
ve.
18
15th
Ave
.
The colored blocks represent a potential zon-ing envelope and not building mass or shape.
Actual future buildings must be contained withinthe volumes and represent a smaller mass of theoverall zone because of setbacks, modulations,FAR and programmatic requirements.
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
21/33
Legend
MIO-65
MIO-37
MIO-105
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
105 3765
30303030
30
30 30 30
Figure 9
Alternate #1 - Site Plan
East Jefferson St
15thA
ve.
16thA
ve.
18thA
ve.
East Cherry St.
17thA
ve.
19thA
ve.
19
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
22/33
The colored blocks represent a potential zon-ing envelope and not building mass or shape.
Actual future buildings must be contained withinthe volumes and represent a smaller mass of theoverall zone because of setbacks, modulations,FAR and programmatic requirements.
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
15th
Ave
.
16th
Ave
.
18th
Ave.
E.Cherry
E.JeffersonSt.
17thA
ve.
Figure 10
Alternate #2 - 3D Zoning Envelope Diagram
10590
200
90
90
Alternate #2 - Increased Vertical Capacity
20
Total Structure Area: 4.5 Million SF
Gross Building Area: 3 Million SF
(1.2 M SF Existing &1.8 M SF New)
Parking: 4,500 Spaces (2,940 New)
Site Area: 601,204 SF
FAR: 5.1
- EXPANSION OF ZONING HEIGHT LIMITS(MIO 90, MIO 105, MIO 200)
- FUTURE FLEXIBLE CAPACITY FOR BUILDING EXPANSION
- MAINTAIN EXISTING MIO BOUNDARY & EXPAND TO
SPENCER TECHNOLOGIES SITE
- 16th Ave. & 18th Ave. STREET VACATIONS
65
Legend
MIO-50
MIO-37
MIO-65
MIO-90
MIO-200
MIO-160
MIO -105
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
23/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 11
Alternate #2 - Site Plan
105
90
200
3030 30
30
90
90
East Jefferson St
15thA
ve.
16thA
ve.
18thA
ve.
East Cherry St.
17thA
ve.
19thA
ve.
21
65
30 30
30
Legend
MIO-50
MIO-37
MIO-65
MIO-90
MIO-200
MIO-160
MIO -105
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
24/33
The colored blocks represent a potential zon-ing envelope and not building mass or shape.
Actual future buildings must be contained withinthe volumes and represent a smaller mass of theoverall zone because of setbacks, modulations,FAR and programmatic requirements.
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 12
Alternate #3 - 3D Zoning Envelope Diagram
Alternate #3 - Increased Vertical Capacity
& Boundary Expansion
105
90
37
200
50
50
37
160
65
65
65
15th
Ave
.
16th
Ave
.
18th
Ave.
E.CherryS
E.JeffersonSt.
17th
Av
e.
22
- EXPANSION OF ZONING HEIGHT LIMITS
(MIO 37, MIO 50, MIO 65, MIO 90,
MIO 105, MIO 160, MIO 200)
- FUTURE FLEXIBLE CAPACITY FOR BUILDING EXPANSION
- EXPAND EXISTING MIO BOUNDARY
- 16th Ave. & 18th Ave. STREET VACATIONS
Total Structure Area: 4.5 Million SF
Gross Building Area: 3 Million SF
(1.2 M SF Existing & 1.8 M SF New)
Parking: 4,500 Spaces (2,940 New)
Site Area: 823,284 SF
FAR: 3.7
Legend
MIO-50
MIO-37
MIO-65
MIO-90
MIO-200
MIO-160
MIO -105
65
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
25/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 13
Alternate #3 - Site Plan
105
37200
3030
5030
65
160
65
90
65
East Jefferson St
15thAve.
16thAve.
18thAve.
East Cherry St.
17thAve.
19thAve.
23
37
65 50 50
Legend
MIO-50
MIO-37
MIO-65
MIO-90
MIO-200
MIO-160
MIO -105
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
26/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 14
Proposed Street Vacation
Issues to the current campus that
warrant the need for the 16th Avenue
street vacation between E. Cherry St.
and E. Jefferson St.:
- Emergency access and ambulance ow- Service and Loading capabilities for the
future campus- Patient care connectivity across the
campus
6. Planned Street Vacations
E Jefferson St.
E Cherry St.
15thAve.
16thAve.
17thAve.
18thAve.
19thAve.
24
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
27/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 15
Proposed Parking
Existing Parking
Proposed Parking Site
Parking Access & Egress
Patient Drop-Off / Pick-Up
Emergency Access & Egress
Service Vehicle Access
7. Planned Parking Development and Access
Future locations for underground
campus needed parking.
- balanced distribution- empty chair locations for phasing
projects- elimination of surface lots- main locations: West Garage,
Main Plaza Garage, East Garage,North Garage
Existing
Plaza
Garage
Potential
Future
East
GaragePotential
FutureWest
Garage
*
*
*
* * *
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
Existing
Surface
Lot
Existing
Surface
Lot
ExistingSurface
Lot
Existing
Surface
Lot
Existing
West
Addition
Existing
West Garage
ExistingED Lot
E Jefferson St.
E Cherry St.
15thAve.
16thAve.
17thAve.
18thAve.
19thAve.
25
Potential
Future
North
Garage
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
28/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
The Squire Park neighborhood is bound-ed by East Union Street to the north,South Jackson Street to the south, on thewest side 12th Avenue and on the east by23rd Avenue.
Although Squire Park became a solidresidential neighborhood, it always hada considerable institutional presence.Squire Park and the larger Central Areadeveloped into a diverse residential neigh-borhood, becoming the home to manyracial and ethnic minorities over the years,including African Americans, Japanese,
Filipino, and Jewish populations. AfterWorld War II, booming development inthe suburbs surrounding Seattle drewthe middle-class population away fromthe Central Area and Squire Park. Lowermiddle-class and elderly populations re-mained in the Central Area. The areasuffered from blight and disinvestmentuntil the early 1990s, when the technol-
ogy boom and a rising population in theCity of Seattle caused more middle-classpopulations to move back to the Central
Area. This transformation of the CentralArea and Squire Park continues today,marked by general economic prosperity,community efforts, and greater investmentin housing and businesses in the area.
A signicant commercial and light-industri-al district developed between the early1900s and into the 1950s on the westernside of the Squire Park neighborhood inthe vicinity of 12th Avenue and East Cher-
ry Street. The western areas of SquirePark, just east of 12th Avenue, were re-platted several years ago to form smallerblocks. The re-platting allowed more in-tense development and re-development.This commercial area is thriving today dueto the dramatic growth of Seattle Universi-ty in recent years. Swedish Medical Cen-terCherry Hill Campus generally serves
as the boundary of commercial and in-stitutional activity along E. Cherry and E.Jefferson Streets.
The King County Youth Service Center(which includes juvenile court), is locatedin the southern section of Squire Park,occupying six acres between 12th and
14th Avenues at East Alder Street. Thebuilding was constructed in 1951 and hasbeen expanded and remodeled severaltimes since its construction. The Countyhas recently issued a Request for Propos-al to redevelop this campus.
8. Neighborhood Uses & Character
26
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
29/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #301295327
Many of the blocks to the north, south andeast of the Cherry Hill campus are resi-dential connector streets. Most have side-walks on both sides of the right-of-wayand street trees in the parking strip. Thismakes them very walk able streets allow-ing the residents to access the local com-mercial districts and variety of institutionsin the neighborhood. E. Cherry Streetacts as one of the main automobile arte-rials through Squire Park, with E. UnionStreet to the north and Yesler Way to thesouth as arterials. E. Jefferson Streethas lower speeds and contains the busroutes.
Transit options in the neighborhood areunder-serviced by convenient bus routesother than on E. Jefferson Street, the onlyeast-west connection. For north-southconnections pedestrians must travel to23rd. Avenue or Broadway which are onthe edges of the neighborhood.
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
30/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
25
30
30
65
40
105
3025105
37
40
50
65
70
240
200
160
85
30
240
90
300
65
300
30
40
40
30
75
75
10565 37
Figure 16
Existing Vicinity Zoning
Maximum Allowable Heights
Legend
NC3-85
NC3-65
NC2-40
NC1-30
L-1
L-3
SF-5000
MIO-50
MIO-37
MIO-65
MIO-85
MIO-70
MIO-90
MIO-240
MIO-200 HR-300
MIO-160
MIO -105 MR-75
28
Squire Park
Neighborhood
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
31/33
v
v
v
v v v
vv
v
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
Figure 17
Neighborhood Plan
Pedestrian Connections
Landmarks
Transit Routes
Parks
Street Arterials
E Jefferson St.
E Cherry St.
15thAve.
16thAve.
17thAve.
18thAve.
19thAve.
14thAve.
t
t
t
t
t
t
29
Immaculate
Conception
Church
Old Fire
Station# 23
Carmack
House
Old
Providence
1910
Building
Coca-Cola
Bottling
PlantFirehouse
Mini Park
Metro Bus
Routes #3,
SU
Athletic
Field
SU
Connolly
Center /
Fitness
Center
Seattle
University
Campus
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
32/33
February 7, 2013
DPD #3012953
9. Neighborhood Planning Precepts
Land Use Compatibility
Design medical facilities to concentrate
height/bulk/scale and activity intensitytoward the center of the campus withless development density as a transitiontoward the campus edges bordering resi-dential uses. Design buildings with scale reducing
elements that break-up massing and bulkand that address spill-over impacts suchas light/glare, noise, and privacy intru-sions. Plan for a permeable campus that is not
a barrier to neighborhood linkages. Contribute to being a place where one
wants to live by being a neighborhoodresource, such as with wellness educationprograms, meeting spaces and other car-ing community outreach.
Trafc & Parking
Provide sufcient supply of parking, con-veniently located. Distinguish way-nding with clear path-ways, orienting landmarks, campus widesignage and lighting. Provide complete streets and green
streets so the public right-of-ways providefor multiple functions that enhance the
neighborhood.
Amenities & Sustainability
Enhance street life quality and provide
human scale improvements. Provide weather protection, pedestrian
oriented lighting and conveniences that
encourage transit use. Reduce car dependence and promote
transportation choices. Create healthy buildings, assure energy
efciency, manage the waste stream and
take actions furthering a low impact sus-tainable environment. Make visual connections between build-ings and the landscape, such as healing
gardens , pocket parks, and planted atri-um with distinctive plants, smells, colorsand seasonal plantings change. Use landscaping for buffers and
screening. Provide usable open spaces that are
neighborhood resources for residents,employees and visitors alike.
30
-
7/29/2019 Concept Plan 130212final
33/33
Diagram from 1994
MIMP Document
Appendix Figure 1
P i A d
10. Appendix
top related