children, ethnicity and long- term illness paper presented to childhoods 2005: oslo, june 2005...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Children, ethnicity and long-term illness Paper presented to Childhoods 2005: Oslo, June
2005
Lucinda PlattUniversity of Essexlplatt@essex.ac.uk
BackgroundThe research presented here is part of a project (joint with colleagues at the University of Sheffield and the London School of Hygiene and Social Action for Health) on long-term illness and poverty and how the relationship between the two -- and the strategies in dealing with them -- vary by ethnic group.This project engages in a complex area that is receiving increasing research and policy attention in relation to such issues as caring, extra costs of disability, the relationship between sickness and work, the role of social security benefits and the interface between work and benefits, and the impact of long-term illness on other household members. However, many gaps still remain, and some current research could benefit from further development and this project hopes to explore a number of the gaps and contribute to evidence base and understanding of patterning of illness across households, specifically contributing to our understanding of how it varies by ethnic group.
Background: the research project (1)Details of the research project:
Limiting illness and poverty: breaking the vicious cycle, January 2005-June 2006Funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Research teamSarah Salway, University of Sheffield (project
leader)Punita Chowbey, University of Sheffield Kaveri Harriss, London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine Lucinda Platt, University of EssexElizabeth Bayliss, Social Action for Health
Background: the research project (2)Specific contribution of the project:
Exploring ethnic group differences in rates of illness, coping with illness and in the relationship between illness and various indicators of poverty (including worklessness)
Looking at and within households, considering the whole unit and the interplay between different household members.
Focusing on social relationships and social participation among those with long-term illness and those with caring responsibilities and other members of their households
Looking at use of benefits by those with long-term illnesses
Using the livelihoods approach to examine coping strategies, and how people use their strengths
Framework of the projectApproach:Predominantly qualitative project (focused on ethnographic work in the East End of London) supplemented by quantitative exploration of some of the issues (including what is being presented in this paper), but integrated approach.Focusing on four main groups: Ghanaians, Punjabi Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and White English.
What do we know?1. We know that those who are long-term sick and
disabled are more likely to be poor than those not, largely through economic inactivity, but also through lower wages and higher risks of unemployment.
2. We know that there is a relationship between poverty and ill-health that appears to work both ways if examined over time: those who are at the lower end of the social class scale are more likely to get sick, but sickness itself also brings increased poverty.
3. We also know that certain minority ethnic groups are much more likely to be unemployed and economically active than others and rates of long-term illness one of the main causes of economic activity vary enormously between groups.
Ethnicity and health
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
General population
Irish
Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Black Caribbean
Chinese
Men
Women
Source: Health Survey for England, 1999, Department of Health, in Focus on Ethnicity: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_social/social_focus_in_brief/ethnicity/ethnicity.pdf
Low income and ethnicity
0
20
40
60
80
White Indian Pakistani/ Bangladeshi
BlackCaribbean
Black NonCaribbean
Other
Before housing costs
After housing costsNotes:1. Low income household is defined as having less than 60 per cent of the median disposable income.
Source: Households Below Average Income, Family Resources Survey, 2000/01, Department for Work and Pensions, in Focus on Ethnicity: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_social/social_focus_in_brief/ethnicity/ethnicity.pdf
Economic Activity by ethnic group and sex
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
White
Mixed
Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Other Asian
Black Caribbean
Black African
Other Black
Chinese
Other
All ethnic groups
Female
Male
Source: Annual Local Area Labour Force Survey, 2001/02, Office for National Statistics
in Focus on Ethnicity: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_social/social_focus_in_brief/ethnicity/ethnicity.pdf
What don’t we know?1. It is hard to disentangle the causal
relationship between long-term illness and economic inactivity, particularly for those at the more deprived end of the class spectrum
2. We don’t know much about whether the relationship between worklessness and ill health varies from ethnic group to ethnic group and the chances of being in particular types of job
What don’t we know? (2)3. We don’t know much about how much
coping strategies for dealing with ill-health and the associated financial strain vary much – and in particular whether they vary between groups
4. We don’t know much about the impact of ill-health on other members of the household and how this varies by ethnic group.
This last area is the focus of today’s paper
Today’s paperOne of a number of quantitative analyses
using different data and exploring social participation, relationship between ethncity, illness and the chances of being employed, also earnings, this paper focuses on what the impact of long-term illness is on children, so far as we can determine it from a large-scale cross-sectional survey of the British population.
FocusIt focuses on two main areas:Measurement issues:
should we be looking at households with children or with children by the characteristics of children? Given the differences in fertility across ethnic groups, we might hypothesise that the story of the impact on children will look different either way – but does it?
what are the possible impacts on children (and ethnic group differences). Can think of these in terms of financial (number of earners around), and caring (potential burden of having an long-term ill adult in the household, especially if no other adults available for care.
Policy contextChild poverty pledge
Changes to incapacity benefit and policy focus on inactivity through ill-health
Differential employment rates of ethnic groups and target to reduce the employment gap
DataThe household file of the Labour Force
Survey, a nationally representative sample survey that is carried out quarterly with a semi- (short) panel structure. About 58, 000 households are covered at each quarter. Questions focus on labour market and other related issues (e.g. education), but there are some general demographic questions as well. The household file, which enables analysis of households rather than individuals, is produced for just the Spring and Autumn quarters each year.
Data cont.This analysis pools (to increase numbers from
minority ethnic groups) quarters from 2002-2004 (6 data extracts altogether). Due to the semi-panel structure of the survey there is some overlap between households, however, in future statistical analyses the standard errors will be adjusted for these.
Acknowledgement:I am grateful to ONS for use of the data and to the UK Data Archive for making them available. Neither ONS or the UK Data Archive, however, bear and responsibility for the analysis or interpretation offered here.Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland
Data ReferencesOffice for National Statistics. Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Group, Quarterly
Labour Force Survey Household Dataset, September - November, 2004 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], February 2005. SN: 5097.
Office for National Statistics. Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Group, Quarterly Labour Force Survey Household Dataset, March - May, 2004 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], August 2004. SN: 5000.
Office for National Statistics. Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Group, Quarterly Labour Force Survey Household Dataset, September - November, 2003 [computer file]. 3rd Edition. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], June 2005. SN: 4820.
Office for National Statistics. Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Group, Quarterly Labour Force Survey Household Dataset, March - May, 2003 [computer file]. 3rd Edition. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], June 2005. SN: 4714.
Office for National Statistics. Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Group, Quarterly Labour Force Survey Household Dataset, September - November, 2002 [computer file]. 2nd Edition. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], August 2004. SN: 4625.
Office for National Statistics. Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Group, Quarterly Labour Force Survey Household Dataset, March - May, 2002 [computer file]. 3rd Edition. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], August 2004. SN: 4575.
Sample numbers by ethnic group
Households with children
Children in households
White British 77 478 135 863
Pakistani 1 433 3 290
Bangladeshi 622 1 521
Black African 1 255 2 580
All (including other ethnic groups)
93 200 165 694
Some definitionsQuestions on illness:
Do you have any health problems or disabilities that you expect will last for more than a year?If yes: Do these health problems or disabilities, when taken singly or together, substantially limit your ability to carry out normal day to day activities? If you are receiving medication or treatment, please consider what the situation would be without the medication or treatment.
NB some standard questions (e.g. census) ask about long-standing illness that limits work or daily activity but as this question allows partialling out of the work-limiting element that is not included in the current definition in order to make more sense of analysis of employment patterns of those with long-term illness
Ethnic group Focus on this paper on just certain ethnic group, defined according to self-identification in relation to a compound question as used in 2001 census. Household ethnicity is defined on the basis of the household reference person, however the impact of alternative ways of defining household ethnicity will be explored in the next stage.
ChildFor simplicity have only considered children aged 0-15.
Results: rates of long-term illness
% with long-standing illness
% with longstanding illness that restricts daily activity
All households 52 36Households with 1 or more working age adults
44 30
Households with 1 or more working age adults and 1 or more children
35 23
Ethnic groups and age profiles
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
White
Mixed
Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Other Asian
Black Caribbean
Black African
Other Black
Chinese
Other
Under 16
16-64
65 and over
Notes:Sample size too small for a reliable estimate of the Other Black group aged 65 and over.
Source: Annual Local Area Labour force Survey, 2001/02, Office for National Statistics
in Focus on Ethnicity: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_social/social_focus_in_brief/ethnicity/ethnicity.pdf
And by ethnicityAll
households with
longstanding
illness
Households with
children and
longstanding illness
All households
with restrictive
illness
Households with
restrictive illness with
children
White British
54 35 36 22
Pakistani 54 51 44 42
Bangladeshi
53 51 43 41
Black African
29 24 19 17
Households with children and illness of working age adults
Where any adult has long-term
illness
Where a working
age adult has a long-
term illness
Where any adult has a restrictive
illness
Where any working
age adult has a
restrictive illness
White British
35 35 22 22
Pakistani 51 46 41 38Bangladeshi
51 46 41 35
Black African
24 24 17 16
Measurement issues: households with children or children in households?
Rate by type of hh
(restrictive long term
illness)
Shares of hhs
(children in hhs) by hh
type
Composition of hhs
with children
with restricted long-term
ill
Composition of
children in households
with restricted long-term
ill
All hhs with children
23% 100 (100)% 100% (23% hhs w
children)
100% (23% of children)
Hhs with 1 child
25% 44 (24)% 47% 27%
Hhs with 2 children
20% 40 (45)% 36% 40%
Hhs with 3 children
23% 12 (21)% 13% 21%
Hhs with 4 or more children
27% 4 (10)% 5% 12%
And by ethnic group: white British
Rate by type of hh
(restrictive long term
illness)
Shares of hhs
(children in hhs) by
hh type
Composition of hhs
with children
with restricted long-term
ill
Composition of
children in households
with restricted long-term
ill
All hhs with children
22 100 100 100
Hhs with 1 child
25 44 (25) 48 28
Hhs with 2 children
20 41 (47) 36 42
Hhs with 3 children
22 12 (20) 12 20
Hhs with 4 or more children
26 3 (8) 4 10
PakistaniRate by
type of hh (restrictive
long term illness)
Shares of hhs
(children in hhs) by
hh type
Composition of hhs
with children
with restricted long-term
ill
Composition of
children in households
with restricted long-term
ill
All hhs with children
42 100 100 100
Hhs with 1 child
50 30 (13) 36 16
Hhs with 2 children
36 31 (27) 27 24
Hhs with 3 children
37 25 (32) 22 29
Hhs with 4 or more children
45 14 (28) 15 31
BangladeshiRate by
type of hh (restrictive
long term illness)
Shares of hhs
(children in hhs) by
hh type
Composition of hhs
with children
with restricted long-term
ill
Composition of
children in households
with restricted long-term
ill
All hhs with children
41 100 100 100
Hhs with 1 child
46 26 (11) 30 12
Hhs with 2 children
39 32 (26) 31 25
Hhs with 3 children
30 23 (28) 17 21
Hhs with 4 or more children
48 19 (35) 22 42
Black AfricanRate by
type of hh (restrictive
long term illness)
Shares of hhs
(children in hhs) by
hh type
Composition of hhs
with children
with restricted long-term
ill
Composition of
children in households
with restricted long-term
ill
All hhs with children
17 100 100 100
Hhs with 1 child
18 38 (18) 41 19
Hhs with 2 children
14 34 (34) 28 27
Hhs with 3 children
18 18 (26) 19 27
Hhs with 4 or more children
17 10 (22) 12 27
Distributions by family type Defining family type to take account of economic status
and potential caring burden:
1 = one working age adult, not ill and in employment2 = one working age adult, ill, and in employment3 = one working age adult, ill, and not in employment4 = more than one working age adult, no working age illness,
and at least one adult in employment5 = more than one working age adult, at least one ill
(unemployed), and all well in employment 6 = more than one working age adult, at least one ill
(employed), and all well in employment7 = more than one working age adult, at least one ill, and at
least one well working age adult not in employment 8 = other combinations
Also created for restrictive illness
Overall distributions of hh typesfor all hhs and hhs with children
All hhs (using all long-term
ill)
Hhs with children
(using all long-term
ill)
All hhs (using
restrictive illness)
Hhs with children
(using restrictive
illness)
1 16 8 19 92 5 2 3 13 7 4 6 34 37 49 46 605 5 5 5 46 13 14 7 77 6 8 5 68 10 11 10 11
And by ethnic group: just those hhs with children for restrictive illnessType White
BritishPakistani Banglade
shiBlack
African
1 9 2 1 11
2 1 0 0 1
3 3 2 2 4
4 60 49 47 42
5 4 7 6 2
6 8 2 1 3
7 5 25 26 6
8 10 13 17 31
And also looking at numbers of children in such householdsType White
BritishPakistani Banglade
shiBlack
African
1 8 2 1 10
2 1 0 0 1
3 3 2 2 5
4 61 49 47 40
5 4 7 7 2
6 7 2 1 3
7 5 24 27 6
8 11 15 17 34
Conclusions It is important to take account of who is affected by illness within
households in addition to the sick person themselves. Despite the fact that illness is associated with age and this greater
among those above working age, approaching a quarter of children live in a household containing someone with a restrictive long-term illness and over a third live in a household with an adult with a long-standing illness.
Over 40% of Bangladeshi and Pakistani households with children have someone with a restrictive long-term illness, but the rate for Black African households with children is as low as 16%
Overall households with few and households with many children have higher rates of long-term illness. This means that using households or children as the unit of analysis makes little difference to the picture. However, by ethnic group there are some striking differences, as rates interact with prevalence of households of different sizes. Thus 30% of children in white British households with an adult with a restricting long-term illness come from families with 3 or more children but 60% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi children do, and over 50% of Black African children do.
It is worth considering a range of aspects of family type when investigating the impact of long-term illness on other household members. Financial impacts and caring responsibilities may operate differently and different groups may be at different risks of them
Next steps To look at the role of disability and other benefits in
households with long-standing illness and containing children, and examine differences by ethnic group
To consider alternative ways of constructing typologies of household structure to pick up on the intersection of employment and illness in more refined ways (including introducing the gender of the adults concerned)
To utilise further questions on attitudes to work in understanding configurations of households
To look at patterns separating out pre-school and school-age children; and investigate by child’s ethnic group rather than that of the household reference person
To identify clear questions to follow up in the in-depth qualitative phase of the research
top related