challenges and opportunities for in vivo imaging in oncology this slide set is abridged for web...

Post on 24-Dec-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Challenges and Opportunities

for In Vivo Imaging

In Oncology

This slide set is abridged for web presentation.

See the Duke SAIRP web site for images from Mouse MRI Atlas

http://wwwcivm.mc.duke.edu/

Presented by Dan Sullivan to the NCI Board of Scientific Advisors, June 2002

Clinical Methodologies•Screening•Diagnosis•Staging•Prognosis•Therapy Monitoring•Image-guided Rx

Laboratory Methodologies

Study biology or interventions in animal models or humans (e.g., functional, in vivo genomics/proteomics; drug development)

In Vivo Imaging For OncologyDevices

(Hardware&Software)

MolecularProbes;ContrastAgents

ImageExploitation;Informatics

OutlineOverview

Look back (portfolio review)

Clinical and Laboratory imaging issues

Molecular Imaging

Image-guided interventions

Conclusion

BIP Portfolio

0

20,000,000

40,000,000

60,000,000

80,000,000

100,000,000

120,000,000

140,000,000

FY96

FY97

FY98

FY99

FY00

FY01

Total PA $ FundedTotal RFA $ FundedOther($)P01($)SBIR/ STTR($)R01($)

BIP FY01 Portfolio

$ (M)

48

11

19 2

36

9

45

R01($)SBIR/ STTR($)P01($)Other($)Total RFA $ FundedTotal PA $ Funded

BIP FY01 RFA Funding

ACRIN (U01) 10,884,947

SAIRP (R24) 6,894,782

ICMIC Planning (P20) 6,355,434

ICMIC (P50) 6,211,663

Prostate Ca (R01; R33) 2,634,319

Molecular Probes (R01) 2,415,395

LIDC (U01) 1,326,774

Imaging in Clinical Trials

ACRIN – more later Rigorous methodology

Two U01’s will not be renewed

Additional venues for diagnostic trials: e.g., ACOSOG; R01’s; R33’s

Imaging in Clinical Trials

More integration of imaging studies in CTEP trials – especially in the neoadjuvant setting

Inter-group Imaging Council

Imaging Cores in Cancer Centers

Access to imaging resources is inadequate

Monitoring Response to Therapy

RECIST Criteria -- good start; volumetric would be better.

Need Functional Response Indicators – “molecular imaging”.

Generic, “downstream” indicator vs. specific, targeted probe?

Chemotherapy Response by MRI & MRS

1 wk pre-Tx76 cc

Day 1 AC x179 cc

Day 42AC x326 cc

Day 70AC x425 cc

Day 112taxol x2

11 cc

Day 178taxol x4

6 cc

partial response to AC, regrowth on taxolfinal pathology - viable IDC and extensive DCIS

593 486 267 79 481 595

Univ. of Minnesota

Molecular Imaging Targets/Probes

mRNA

DNA

mRNA

Receptor Mapping

Enzyme Activity:Inhibition, Conc.,Synthesis

Accumulation viaAA Transport orProtein Synthesis Oligonucleotides

mRNA Binding

Reporter ProbeReporter Gene DNA

AAT

glut 4

Accumulation viaPhosphorylation[18F]FDG

MAb, FragmentsHormones

Drugs and LigandsPeptides

Accumulation viaDNA-Synthesis

InternalizationInternalization

HexokinaseHexokinase

FDG-PET Monitoring Response to STI571 in GIST

Baseline 24 hrs 7 days 2 mos 5.5 mos

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Light image NIRF image

In vivo imaging of protease (Cathepsin B) activity

Human LX1 small cell lung tumor 10 nmole C-PGC, 24 hr

2 mm

Weissleder, Nature Biotech, 1999Nature Biotech; 1999;17:375-378

A Nanoscale, Targeted Liposome

TargetingMAb or ligand

High affinitymetal binding Gd

encapsulation

Stanford Univ.

Phase 1, 2 Clinical Trials

MMPI and Cancer: Trials and Tribulations, Coussens, Science 2002

Targeted Agent Trials:

Problems: Selecting patients Biologic endpoint assessment

Examples: Matrix metaloproteinase inhibitors Anti-angiogenesis therapies 17-AAG (HSP90 inhibitor)

Construction ofMultimeric Ligands

PEG

Image

Therapy

MSH

CCK

Enk.

Gillies; U. AZ

Multimeric Specificity

Nano-engineered Optical Agents

Emission spectra can be “tuned”

[Nanotechnology: the creation of functional materials, devices and systems through control of matter at the scale of 1 to 100 nanometers, and the exploitation of novel properties and phenomena at the same scale.]

DCIDE

Development of Clinical Imaging Drugs and Enhancers

Purpose: Facilitate pre-clinical development of promising imaging agents by providing the resources needed for successful IND application.

Small Animal Imaging for Drug Development (Demonstration Project:

BIP, DTP, CTEP)

anti-angiogenesis first model system;NCI will supply the animals, drugs, and imaging protocol, to contractors;tissues will be returned to NCI for standardized processing.

Image-guided Interventions

Future Potential

Surgical Robots

•David Townsend, U

Pitt.•NCI R01, 1993•Now commercially

available• ~ 150 expected to be

sold by 2003•Townsend has

received R33 for

second-generation•Higher-resolution,

faster acquisition PET•Sub 4-minute scans

PET/CT

Quantitative whole body imaging in 5 min…………or less

PET/CT-Based IMRT: Cervical Cancer14 mm increase in axial extent of para-aortic lymph nodes

Imaging ModalitiesAnatomy Physiolo

gyMolecula

rCTUSMR

IPET

Optical

FMT imaging of CAB in 9L glioma

1cm

1cm

1cm

1cm

a)

b)

0 1 2

(cm)

(nM)

g)

h)

i)

Emission light

White light

Excitation light

Nature Med, 2002

Depth (cm)

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

100

102

104

106

108

Flu

ores

cenc

e st

reng

th (

coun

ts •

sec

-1 •

mm

-2)

30dB

20dB

10dB

Breast (40-70yrs)Breast (20-40yrs)Lung adultMuscle adultBrain adult

10-4

10-2

Depth penetration in human tissues

Ntziachristos, Ripoll, Weissleder. Optics Letters, 2002; 27:333-335

Whole-body Screening

Now:US – CTGermany – MRIJapan – FDG PET

Future (US):PET/CT?MRI?

Skin Cancer Screening

“Optical screening”;< 2% chance of AK Ca;Marked “Overdiagnosis”

Rx is: “benign”,inexpensive,

“Image-guided”.

MRI-Guided, Focused Ultrasound System

KHH99

Treatment plan Ductal invasivebreast cancer

80 ultrasound foci

MRI-guided, focused ultrasound therapy

MRI-guided, focused ultrasound therapy

0 40°C

T

Temperature monitoring during therapy(SRTF, T1-w)

•Noninvasive through intact skin

•No scar

•No anesthesia

•No hospitalisation

•Immediate Effect

•Repeatable

MRI-guided, focused ultrasound therapySummary, properties

Integrated Cancer Care

Diagnosis TreatmentDetection

Detection Diagnosis Treatment

sensing

communication judgment

data analysis effector action

Unconventional Innovations Web Site:

UIP Awardees FY 99

U of Michigan, James Baker, M.D. Nano-scale based dendrimer devices

U of Penn, Britton Chance, Ph.D. Near-infrared detector and contrast agents for molecular targets

U of Alabama at Birmingham, David Curiel, M.D. Genetic approaches to tumor detection and intervention

U of Cal at Davis, N.C. Luhmann, Jr.Ph.D.Compton light source for high-contrast X-rays;

NASA Ames Research Center, Meyya Meyyapan, Ph.D.Carbon nanotube-based biosensor and prototype biosensor catheter

UIP Awardees FY 2000

U of Washington, Kirk W. Beach, M.D., Ph.D. Ultrasound detection of tissue pulsatility

U of Pittsburgh, Daniel Farkas, Ph.D. Optical imaging platform for mesoscopic imaging

U of Michigan, Raoul Kopelman, Ph.D.Dynamic nano-particles for detection and treatment

Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Gregory M. Lanza, M.D., .Ph.D.Targeted Nanoparticle Emulsion for Molecular Imaging and Local Drug Delivery

In Vivo Imaging For Oncology

Go back and review slide 2

AcknowledgementsEllen Feigal Laurence Clarke

John Hoffman Gary Kelloff

Edward Staab Houston Baker

Barbara Croft Keyvan Farahani

Barbara Galen Guoying Liu

Anne Menkens Richard Reba

Johnnie Smith James Tatum

Manuel Torres Michael Vannier

And Many Investigators.

top related