breakdown studies nlcta & ttf
Post on 17-Jan-2016
35 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project
Breakdown Studies NLCTA & TTF
Marc Ross
• Diagnostics• Aggressive Vacuum processing
• Conditioning Protocol
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
2Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
RF Breakdown Diagnostics
• Goals:– Location within mm
– Quantify energy deposition
• Comprehensive recording
– Observe emitted light
• Provide feedback to manufacturing & fabrication process
• Optimize conditioning protocol
• Observations:– Multi-breakdown events caused by reflection
– Breakdown grouping in time
– Structure damage is not explained by material removed by arc pits themselves
– Many (most) structures show enhanced concentration of breakdown in WG coupler
SRF –’emitter locating’- Diagnostics– Probably the most important is the resistive-thermal mapping
– 0.2 s response time
– 0.15 mDeg resolution
– ~ 100’s of monitors/cavity
Provide details of breakdown/emitter source locations (~mm resolution)
– for post-mortem analysis / feedback to manufacturing
Warm equivalent thermal pulse microphones
Acoustic Emission (AE)Easy for L band structures –
TTF
AE used for industrial structure monitoring (e.g. planes, bridges)
Complementary to “macrosopic microwave” diagnostics
10 mm
TTF FNAL RF Gun Breakdown studies
(most breakdowns from coupler iris)
TTF beam direction
Nov 2001
• 1.5 cell L band • Copper 350 us RF
power in
TTF operation affected by RF gun breakdownDifficult to reliably pinpoint source from RF diagnostics
K. Floettmann J. Nelson D. Ramert
Raw signals triggered by RE protection circuit(35 Mev/m; 300 s)
shows estimate of start time
Vol
ts
sec
TTF RF Gun Breakdown
Zoom showing relative arrival time & pattern recognition error
Cplr iris (wall)
Cplr cell
Inpt WG
Inpt WGCplr iris Cplr iris
Cplr cell (wall)cathode
The downstream side of the coupler iris is always the earliest signal
TTF RF Gun Breakdown
• 3 dimensional geometry:• Group sensors along 3 projections:
input waveguide
circumference of coupler cell
circumference of coupler iris
AE sensor (8 each)
(looking from aisle)(looking from above)
(looking down stream)(Aisle side)
(wall side)
TTF RF Gun Breakdown
(looking from aisle)
input waveguide
5 5
4
4
3
3
speed = 3 mm/us
TTF RF Gun Breakdown
Best guess at breakdown location
circumference of coupler iris
(looking from above)
6
6
55
1
1
(Aisle side)
TTF RF Gun Breakdown
circumference of coupler cell(looking down stream)
22
6
6
7
7
(wall side)
TTF RF Gun Breakdown
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
12Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
X-band (NLCTA) acoustic emission
• Clearly audible sound from breakdown – heard from n-1 generation transport components (e.g. flower petal mode converter, bends)
• Small, 1MHz bandwidth industrial or homemade sensors
• 10 MHz bandwidth recorders (3 samples/mm)– Look for start time (TTF) of ‘ballistic phonons’
– or Amplitude (NLCTA)
• Broadband mechanical impulse – (2001- limited by sensor performance)
– Typ. ~ 7 mm
AE sensor results:
• Multi-breakdown pulses• Multi-pulse breakdowns
• Azimuthal breakdown locations• Structure energy deposition
• But: SRF Nb is sheet and Cu is 3D
70 MeV/m TW structure breakdown AE raw signals:(48 10 MHz scope traces)
z
t
normal pulse n-2 n-1bkdn n
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
14Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
Input coupler problem:
• Breakdowns concentrated
• Attempt to reduce input WG group velocity appear not to affect breakdown rate
• Forward/reflected RF diagnostics do not localize breakdown beyond indicating which cell
• Fields are a bit higher in the input coupler – but an electrically similar coupler made at KEK shows very different breakdown performance
Acoustic sensor studies of input coupler breakdown
Plan views of two input coupler assemblies
T53 VG3 F (KEK; diffusion bonded cell) T53 VG3 RA (SLAC; H2 braze)
SLAC-built input coupler exactly where are breakdown events?
Cutaway perspective view of VG3RA input coupler
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
17Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
34
2 56
78
9
AE sensor response (int. ampl) vs sensor #
All coupler breakdowns come from one side or the other
1 10
2 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
40 mm
Sensor signals from ~ 600 coupler breakdowns
LeftRight
Data: 1/24-1/30830 bkdns289 R 259 L270 F (30 bulk RA)
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
20Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
21Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
Time evolution of rms amplitude vs azimuth
Right Left
azimuthtime
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
22Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
23Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
• Diffusive vs ballistic
• Plot vs distance
• Source id
• 3 girdles– beam-axial (prev. plots)
– WG axial
– drop – line axial
Vacuum processing (in-situ bake) 2/01
Missing Energy interlock installed 11/00Narrow pulse width fault recovery 3/01EPICs installed 8/01
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
25Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
structure imagerImager for standing wave structures
Mirror in profile monitor body
Frame grabber system triggered on breakdowns
Focus on central input coupler
Averaging 07/20/01, 500 images
Averaging from 13pm to 23 pm, 07/19/01, 500 images
Averaging 07/31/01 to 08/02/01, 1000 images
Breakdown in standing wave structures
Average of many images;Spots of light are on accel. iris
close to coupling iris
Up is up
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
27Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb0
50
100Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
10-9
10-8
10-7
Vacuum performance of NLCTA test structures
• Pump current a poor substitute for gauges
DS2S T53T105
Standing wave structure bakeout
In-situ bakeout history
• Showing difference between gassy bake (T20/T105) and clean bake (T53)
RGA –RF 240 ns
I2= 5.5 10-13 A
CO
CO2
CH3O - CH4
C
RF ON 65MV/m 240 ns
I2= 5 10-13 ACO
CO2
CH3
O - CH4
C
RF ON 65MV/m240 ns
TRIP
1e-13
No TRIP
1e-14
1e-12
1e-15
2e-14
1e-14
0
Ion Current
T105 RGA during breakdown
EPICs Control Panel – 8/01
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
32Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
EPICs
• Operates synchronously– Digitize RF signals at full 60 Hz rate– Low latency expansion and 120 Hz operation
• Compute missing energy & respond accordingly– Ramp power and pulse width for smooth recovery– Log each event – energy and location
• Skeleton legacy hardware system used for backup only
• EPICs is used throughout the world (except CERN/FNAL)
• (not really designed for high repetition rate pulsed machines)
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
33Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
NLCTA RF Breakdown Studies:
• J. Frisch
• K. Jobe
• F. Le Pimpec
• D. McCormick
• T. Naito
• J. Nelson
• T. Smith
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
34Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
DS2S Operation – ½ Day close up
• RF vs time – 12 hr period
• Structure damage: 10/00 & 2/01
• Low fault voltage
• Reset time – 2 minutes
• Gaps – logger sampling
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
35Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
RF breakdown
1. What are the precursors?Time correlations – multi-breakdown pulses / multi-pulse breakdowns
2. breakdown damage as a run-away phenomenaHow is the parent fault initiated?
How many faults are required to achieve high gradient operation?
3. LocalizationSpatial distribution of faults / Energy distribution / damage distribution
4. Acoustic sensors to understand multiple breakdowns and breakdown sequencesParallel vs serial sensing
5. Vacuum processingproduction & installation
Changing character with new structures
Adsorbed gas, surface defect, surface contaminant, subsurface contaminant
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
36Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
Physics of Breakdown• Grouping of events (only possible during ~stable operation)
– Soft events < 10% missing energy• Even after SLED2 high power pulse is fully absorbed in load!
– Hard events -- missing energy
• Multiple arc breakdowns– 30% of trigger sample during ‘processing’ steady increase of RF power– Initiators of prolonged breakdown sequence (spitfest)– moving arc locations
• Breakdown sequence model:– Start with (contaminant?) at random location– multiple arcs upstream of original - large missing energy– large ‘collateral’ damage upstream of initiator
• caused by large VSWR • many sites
– subsequent events eventually ‘heal’?
Author NameDate
Slide #
Next Linear Collider Test Next Linear Collider Test AcceleratorAccelerator
37Breakdown Studies – NLCTA & TTF - Marc Ross – LC022/7/02
Structure Processing Protocol
• Reflections are not a reliable method to capture breakdown
• Use missing energy (inputf – loadf)/inputf & compare with nominal (better term is ‘lost energy’)– Typical trip threshold is 10%
• Response:– Ramp short pulse power first, then pulse width
– May use many minutes following vacuum event (mostly in transport)
– Drop target power during extended group of breakdown events
top related