as avaliaÇÕes global e regional do ipbes e o maes
Post on 10-Jan-2017
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
AS AVALIAÇÕES GLOBAL E
REGIONAL DO IPBES E O MAES
I
Isabel Sousa Pinto Carlos Guerra Ponto Focal IPBES Portugal Instituto de Ciencias Agrárias e
CLA IPBES Regional Assessment ECA Ambientais Mediterranicas
Universidade do Porto Universidade de Évora
MAES Mapping and Assessment of
Ecosystems and their Services
IPBES
• Established in April 2012, Panama
• Objective: To strengthen the science-policy interface for
biodiversity and ecosystem services for the conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity, long-term human well-being
and sustainable development
• Currently 124 Members
• Secretariat hosted
in Bonn, Germany
Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
4 functions of IPBES
IPBES was established with four agreed functions:
• Assessment
Deliver global, regional and thematic assessments,
and promote and catalyse support for sub-global
assessments
• Policy support
tools
Identify policy relevant tools/methodologies, facilitate
their use, and promote and catalyse their further
development
• Capacity
building
Prioritize key capacity building needs, and provide
and call for financial and other support for priority
needs
• Knowledge
generation
Identify knowledge needs of policymakers, and
catalyse efforts to generate new knowledge
including:
• Be scientifically independent and ensure credibility, relevance and
legitimacy;
• Provide policy-relevant information, but not policy-prescriptive
advice;
• Recognize and respect the contribution of indigenous and local
knowledge;
• Ensure the full use of national, subregional and regional
assessments and knowledge by a bottom-up approach
• Collaborate with existing initiatives, including multilateral
environment agreements, United Nations bodies and networks of
scientists and knowledge holders
IPBES’ Operating Principles
Secretariat (including Technical Support Units)
Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP)
Responsible for carrying out the scientific and
technical functions of the work programme,
Bureau
Responsible for overseeing the
administrative functions of IPBES
Plenary: Decision-making body
Responsible for the overall work programme, working through Bureau and MEP
Task forces on capacity-building,
knowledge and data, and indigenous
and local knowledge
Expert groups for assessments,
policy support tools and other studies
Key structures of IPBES
Stakeholder involvement
Plataforma Portuguesa IPBES
WWW.ipbes.pt
IPBES Conceptual Framework
IPBES 1st work programme
Objective 1: Strengthen the capacity and knowledge foundations of
the science-policy interface to implement key IPBES functions
Objective 2: Strengthen the
science-policy interface on
biodiversity and ecosystem
services at and across the
sub-regional, regional and
global levels
Objective 3: Strengthen
the knowledge-policy
interface with regard to
thematic and
methodological issues
Objective 4: Communicate and evaluate
IPBES activities, deliverables and findings
The work programmme is entirely based on requests from governments and stakeholders
Objective 4 Communicate and evaluate Platform activities, deliverables and findings:
a) Catalogue of relevant assessments
b) Development of an information and data management plan
c) Catalogue of policy support tools and methodologies
d) Set of communication, outreach and engagement strategies, products and processes
e) Reviews of the effectiveness of guidance, procedures, methods and approaches to inform future development of the Platform
Objective 1 Strengthen the capacity and knowledge foundations of the science-policy interface to implement key functions of the Platform: a) Priority capacity-building-needs to implement the Platform work programme are matched with resources through catalysing financial and in-kind
support b) Capacities needed to implement the Platform work programme are developed with support provided by network on capacity-building c) Procedures and approaches for working with indigenous and local knowledge systems d) Priority knowledge and data needs for policy-making are addressed through catalysing efforts to generate new knowledge and networking
Objective 2 Strengthen the SPI across the subregional, regional and global levels: a) Guide on production and integration of
assessments from and across all scales
b) Regional/Subregional assessments on biodiversity and ecosystem services
c) Global assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Objective 3 Strengthen the SPI regarding thematic and methodological issues: a) Thematic assessment on pollination and food production
b) Thematic assessments on land degradation and restoration; on invasive alien species; and on sustainable use.
c) Policy support tools and methodologies for scenarios analysis and modelling of biodiversity and ecosystem services based on an assessment and a guide
d) Policy support tools and methodologies regarding value, valuation and accounting of biodiversity and ecosystem services based on an assessment and a guide
IPBES 1st work programme
Yearquarter 1st quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1st quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1st quarter 4th quarter 1st quarter 4th quarter
Deliverable
1a+1b
2c
3a
Evaluation
scoping
scoping
scoping
Evaluation
Thematic Assessment on Invasive Alien Species
Thematic Assessment on Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Thematic Assessment on Land Dergradation and Restoration
Assessment Guide
scoping
scoping
2nd quarter2nd quarter 3rd quarter
4e
3c
3d
4a
4c
3bi
3biii
1c
1d+4b
4d
2a
2b
3bii
1st quarter
2016 20172nd quarter2nd quarter
2018
Thematic Assessment on Pollination
Regional/Subregional Assessments on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
20141st quarter
2015
Catalogue of Assessments
Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
Catalogue of Policy Support Tools and Methodologies
Task Force on Indigeneous and Local Knowledge Systems
Task Force on Knowledge and Data
scoping and guide review Methodological Assessment on Diverse Conceptualisation of Values
Further Development of Tools and Methods for Scenario Analysis and ModellingMethodological Assessment on Scenario Analysis and Modelling
Further Development of Tools and
Methods Regarding Concept. of Values
20193rd quarter
IPBES Work Programme 2014-2018
IPBES 7
(13 - 19 May)
Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
IPBES 3
12 - 17 Jan
IPBES 5
(6 - 12 Mar)
IPBES 4
(8 - 14 Feb)
IPBES 6
(9 - 15 Apr)
Task Force on Capacity Building
IPBES 1st work programme
About 1000 experts selected (ca. 3000 nominations)
19 expert groups and 3 task forces established
Secretariat + 8 Technical Support Units established:
4 TSUs for Regional Assessments: Africa, Americas, Asia-Pacific, ECA
Capacity building; Indigenous & local knowledge; Knowledge & data; and scenarios
2 assessments about to be finalized and to deliver in February 2016 (IPBES-4)
Pollination and pollinators associated with food production
Scenarios analysis and modelling
5 new assessments initiated in 2015
Land degradation and restoration
4 Regional/Subregional assessments: Africa; Americas; Asia-Pacific; ECA
4 possible future assessments scoped in 2015
Global Assessment
Invasive alien species
Sustainable use of biodiversity
Diverse conceptualization of values of biodiversity and ecosystem services
Progress since 2014
Portuguese Participation • Vânia Proença – IST, ULisboa - Policy support tools and methodologies for
scenario analysis and modelling • Isabel Sousa Pinto –Ciimar, FC UPorto - Scoping Regional and Sub-
regional Assessments • Ana Mendes –UÉvora - Scoping of Land Degradation and Restoration • • Isabel Sousa Pinto Ciimar, FCUP– Coordinating Lead Author – ECA • Cristina Marta-Pedroso IST, UL - Leading Author - ECA – Regional and Sub
Regional Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services from Europe and Central Asia
• Vânia Proença IST, ULisboa- Leading Author ECA • Carlos Guerra, UÉvora – Young Scholar – ECA
• Ana Mendes – Leading Author - Land Degradation and Restoration • Francisco Moreira ISA, ULisboa - Leading Author - Land Degradation and
Restoration • Isabel Sousa Pinto Ciimar, FCUP - Scoping for the Global Assessment
Regional Assessments
• Scoping – August 2014 • Outcomes of scoping process • 5 Regions were identified:
• Africa,
• The Americas,
• Asia-Pacific,
• Europe and Central Asia,
• Open Oceans
Not approved by IPBES 3
Approved by IPBES 3
Chapter 1: Setting the scene
Chapter 2: Nature’s benefits to people and quality of life
Chapter 3: Status, trends and future dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystems underpinning nature’s benefits to people
Chapter 4: Direct and indirect drivers of change in the context of different perspectives on quality of life
Chapter 5: Integrated and cross-scale analysis of interactions of the natural world and human society
Chapter 6: Options for governance, institutional arrangements and private and public decision making across scales and sectors
Regional Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Status and trend – drivers – scenarios – (policy) options
Regional and Sub-Regional Assessment of Biodiversity
and Ecosystem Services for Europe and Central Asia
(ECA)
Western Europe
Central Europe
Eastern Europe
Central Asia
Chapter 1: Setting the scene
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 2: Nature’s benefits to people and quality of life
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 3: Status, trends and future dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystems underpinning nature’s benefits to people
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 4: Direct and indirect drivers of change in the context of different perspectives on quality of life
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 5: Integrated and cross-scale analysis of interactions of the natural world and human society
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 6: Options for governance, institutional arrangements and private and public decision making across scales and sectors
Regional Assessment Chapters
ECA team
ECA timeline
IPBES
3
MEP/
Bureau
mee
ting
1st au
thor m
eetin
g
MEP/
Bureau
mee
ting
IPBES
4
Announcem
ent r
eview
to G
overn
men
ts
MEP/
Bureau
mee
ting
1st re
view
2nd auth
or mee
ting
Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16
2nd auth
or mee
ting
MEP/
Bureau
mee
ting
Announcem
ent r
eview
to G
overn
men
ts
2nd revie
w
MEP/
Bureau
mee
ting
3rd a
uthor m
eetin
g
MEP/
Bureau
mee
ting
Final
Gove
rnm
ent r
eview
IPBES
6M
edia lau
nch
Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18
-1 Order Draft18 Sept
Zero Order Draft Nov 2015
First Order Draft April 2016
Second Order Draft & Summary for Policy Makers
Jan 2017
Final report & Summary for Policy Makers
Dec 2017
Scoping for Global Assessment
• Scoping – Oct 2015
• Draft on review until 3 Nov
• Build on Regional and other IPBES
Assessments
• Integrates other assessments - WOA
• Approved IPBES 4
• Work 2016-2019
Scoping for Global Assessment
• Chapter outline
• I. Understanding global opportunities for sustainable development in human-nature interactions
• II. Status and trends in human-nature interactions at global level
• III. Understanding the progress towards meeting major international goals
• IV. Plausible futures of human-nature interactions
• V. Scenarios and pathways towards sustainable futures
• VI. Opportunities for decision-makers
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Currently done
Currently in progress
EU Missing
ECA Missing
Ecosystem Service Assessments in
ECA
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Currently done
Currently in progress
EU Missing
Ecosystem Service Assessments in Europe
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Portuguese terrestrial ecosystems
Portuguese marine ecosystems
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
There is a perception within IPBES that the ES framework is limited. In IPBES there is the intention to assess the links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and its benefits to people. Relevant valuation perspectives were raised.
Nature Biodiversity
Assessments
Ecosystem Service
Assessments
Benefits from Nature
IPBES
pre MEA MEA, TEEB, MAES, …
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Possible links?
Different conceptual frameworks Need to establish eventual links
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
National Reports
European Reports
The work done within MAES at different levels (National and European) can be useful for the IPBES Europe and Central Asia Assessment as it actively contribute to the pool of data and knowledge available about ecosystems and their services (state and trends).
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
32
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
CICES classification
adopted
ability to use and compare
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
2015 2016 2017 2018
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Current Mapping Deadline
New Mapping Deadline
Economic Valuation
and Accounting
1st Author Meeting
Zero Order Draft
November
1st Order Draft April
2nd Author Meeting
September
2nd Order Draft
January
Final Report and Summary December
Reporting and Publication??
People that work on both are the best link
• Thank you
ispinto@ciimar.up.pt
Assessment versus review
Review Assessment
Audience Scientists Decision-makers
Done by One or a few Large and varied group
Topic Simple and narrow Broad and complex
Identifies gaps in Research: curiosity-driven Knowledge for implemen-tation: problem-
driven
(Un)certainty statements Not required Essential
Judgement Hidden Required but clearly flagged
Coverage Exhaustive, historical Sufficient to deal with main range of
uncertainty
Synthesis Not required Essential to reduce complexity
Source: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
top related