appendix table of contents - jica
Post on 20-Apr-2022
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
APPENDIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix 1 Joint Meeting Material(Handout)
Appendix 1-1 Joint Meeting Member ................................................................... A-1
Appendix 1-2 Joint Meeting Part-1 ....................................................................... A 20
Appendix 1-3 Joint Meeting Part-2 ....................................................................... A -28
Appendix 2 Materials Related to Economic Analysis ............................................ A -42
Appendix 3 Materials Related to Compensation Costs .......................................... A -50
Appendix 1
Appendix 1-1 Joint Meeting Member
A-1
A joint meeting with the Philippine related organizations was planned on March 13, 2020, but the meeting
was canceled due to the influence of COVID-19. Therefore, the meeting materials were distributed to related
organizations, and the materials and comments on this survey were collected.
The table below shows the list of participating organizations of the Joint Meeting and the meeting request
form scheduled to be held on March 13, 2020.
No. Organization Representative Person 1 DPWH EMIL K. SADAIN, CESO II
(Undersecretary for UPMO Operations) 2 DPWH-UPMO RAMON A. ARRIOLA, CESO III
(Project Director, UPMO-FCMC) 3 DPWH-UPMO LEONILA R. MERCADO
(Project Manager I, UPMO-FCMC) 4 LLDA General Manager JAIME JOEY C. MEDINA 5 MMDA Director BALTAZAR N. MELGAR 6 DENR Secretary ROY A. CIMATU 7 NEDA Assistant Secretary RODERICK M. PLANTA 8 DOST-PAGASA Dr. VICENTE B. MALANO 9 DOST-PHIVOLCS Undersecretary RENATO U. SOLIDUM, JR. 10 UP-National Hydraulic
Research Center Director ROBERTO S. SORIANO, Ph.D.
11 DILG Secretary EDUARDO M. ANO 12 Province of Rizal Hon. REBECCA ALCANTARA YNARES 13 Province of Cavite Hon. JUANITO VICTOR C. REMULLA, JR. 14 Province of Laguna Hon. RAMIL L. HERNANDEZ 15 City of Bacoor Hon. LANI MERCADO REVILLA 16 City of Taguig Hon. LINO EDGARDO CAYETANO 17 City of Muntinlupa Hon. JAIME DELA ROSA FRESNEDI 18 City of Las Pinas Hon. IMELDA T. AGUILAR 19 City of Paranaque Hon. EDWIN L. OLIVAREZ 20 JICA Philippines Office Ms. Ayumu OHSHIMA
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
A-19
Appendix 1
Appendix 1-2 Joint Meeting Part-1
A-20
CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. eCTII)
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. eNK)
Follow -up Study on Parañaque Spillway Project
JOINT MEETING
Part-1 Update of Draft Comprehensive
Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay
Japan International Cooperation Agency
May 8, 2020
■Topics
2
Part-1
1. Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay
Part-2
2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.2 Additional Economic Benefit which Include the Characteristic of Laguna
de Bay Inundation Phenomena (long-term inundation)
2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate
Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River
2.2.4 Result of Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.3 Improvement Effects Other Than Economic Evaluation
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
2.5 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan in Conservation and Sustainable
Development of Laguna de Bay
A-21
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
<1 Goals and Safety Level of Flood Control>
3
• Considering the development status of Laguna lakeshore area, the historical flooding
damage, the impact of climate change, etc., prevent and reduce inundation damage to
1/100 probability floods after climate change by gradually constructing Parañaque spillway
and lakeshore diking system over 30 years
<2 Design Flood Level eDFL)>
• The Design Flood Level (DFL) of Laguna de Bay is set at 13.8m
<3 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan>
Structural Measures (water level rise suppression and flood damage reduction)
• Construction of Parañaque Spillway (underground tunnel, Diameter13m
*the inner diameter should be closely inspected in about 0.1 m in next F/S stage.
• Lakeshore Diking System (Total length 82.75km, including drainage channels, drainage stations, back
levee, bridges, etc.)
Non-Structural Measures
• Stricter development regulations within lake management boundaries (EL.12.5m or less)
• Promotion of land use regulations and ensuring the safety of residents in flood-prone areas (including
resettlement)
• Hazard map creation, evacuation plan, disaster prevention awareness-raising activities for residents,
local disaster prevention plan
• Construction of flood forecasting and warning system
4
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
<4 Outline of Parañaque Spillway>
• Commercial facilities and houses are dense on the assumed route of the Parañaque Spillway,
and if the open channel type is adopted, many residents will be relocated, making
commercialization difficult. In order to minimize social impact, the drainage channel will be
Underground Pressure Tunnel type.
• In the case of climate change, Parañaque Spillway requires a tunnel inner diameter of 13m
and a maximum discharge rate of 240m3 / s to reduce the highest water level of Laguna
Lake at 14.5m during a 1/100 probability flood to 13.8m eDFL).
Operation Level of Parañaque Spillway
・January~May(Non-flooding Period):non-operation
・June~July(water level raising Period):11.5m
・August~December(water level lowering Period):12.0m
Figure 1-2 Effect of Parañaque Spillway of 100-year Return Period
(with Climate Change, D=13m, Max. Discharge=240m3/s)
Scale of Structures
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Dis
cha
rge
of
Pa
ran
aq
ue
Sp
illw
ay (m
3/s
)
Lake
Wa
ter
Leve
l(m
)
Return Period 100-year Existing Condition RCP4.5_without PSW
RCP4.5_withPSW RCP4.5_PSW_Discharge
Operation start level
Aug-Dec:12.0mOperation start level
Jun-July:11.5m
Parañaque Spillway
discharge
14.5m → 13.8m0.7m decline
A-22
<Alignment Plan>・The Parañaque spillway route (underground tunnel) will be studied based on the following four plans.
Figure 1-3 Routes of Parañaque Spillway
Route-1
Route-3
Route-2A
Route-2B
Item Route-1 Route-2A Route-2B Route-3
Route
Location of Intake Lower Bicutan Sucat Sucat Sucat
Location of OutletSouth Parañaque
RiverSan Dionisio
River
Zapote River Zapote River
Length of Open Channel 1.2km 0.7km 0.7km 0.6km
Inner Diameter of Tunnel D13m D13m D13m D13m
Length of Tunnel 6.0km 7.2km 8.7km 8.8km
Depth of Tunnel from Surface > 50m < 30m < 30m > 50m
Height of Intake Vertical Shaft 75m - - 75m
Height of Outlet Vertical Shaft 75m 32m 32m 75m
Length of River Improvement 4.0km 8.0km 1.0km 1.0km
Lower Bicutan
Sucat
5
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
<Outline of Lakeshore Diking System>
15.0m
13.8m
Figure 1-3 Lakeshore Dike Typical Cross Section
6
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
• To construct a lakeshore diking system in the priority area along the lakeshore area to prevent
inundation. Lakeshore diking system consists of lakeshore dike, drainage canals, pumping stations,
community roads, bridges, etc., and resolves flood damage caused by rising water levels in Laguna de Bay.
• Lakeshore dike elevation will be 15.0m, considering 1.2m free board add to 13.8m (DFL).
• Lakeshore dike will be constructed on lakeshores of Laguna Lake elevation of 12 m to 12.5 m.
• Prioritize the location of lakeshore diking systems based on land use, beneficiary population, beneficiary
area, etc. in the shore area, and arrange lakeshore diking from areas with higher priority.
• The length of the planned lakeshore dike will be about 83 km compared to about 220 km around the lake
shore, and non-structural measures (warning systems, etc.) will be used for areas where there are few
assets and the economic effect is low for arranging lakeshore diking system.
A-23
<7 Plan of Lakeshore Diking System ~Approx. 83km divided into three phases~>
• Lakeshore Diking System is implemented in 82.75 km from Angono to Santa Cruz in three phases.
・ Phase I : Angono to Muntinlupa、17.02km in Length
・ Phase II : San Pedro to Calamba、32.83km in Length
・ Phase III : Los Banos to Santa Cruz、32.90km in Length
Figure 1-4 Layout of Lakeshore Diking System (Phase I, II, III)
Table 1-1 Length of Lakeshore Diking System
(Phase I, II, III)
7
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
<8 Plan of Drainage Stations ~Approx. 30 Stations divided into three phases~>
Table 1-2 Drainage Stations (Phase I, II, III)
8
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
• Drainage pumping stations for draining inland water
are implemented in three phases as part of the
82.75km Lakeshore Diking System planned from
Angono to Santa Cruz.
Figure1-5 Location of Drainage Stations(Phase I, II, III)
No River Basin
Retarding Pond Capacity of
Pomp
em3/s)Area
(ha)
Depth
(m)
Capacity
(m3)
1
SB-23 Muntinlupa
SB23-RB1 0.9 2.0 17,000 5.0
2 SB23-RB2 1.2 2.0 23,000 7.0
3 SB23-RB3 1.4 2.0 27,000 9.0
4 SB23-RB4 0.5 2.0 10,000 3.0
5 SB23-RB5 0.2 2.0 4,900 2.0
6
SB-22 San Pedoro
SB22-RB1 0.5 2.0 9,000 2.0
7 SB22-RB2 1.7 2.0 34,000 7.0
8 SB22-RB3 1.2 2.0 23,500 5.0
9SB-21 Binan
SB21-RB1 6.4 2.0 128,200 27.0
10 SB21-RB2 1.3 2.0 25,000 5.0
11
SB-20 Sta. Rosa
SB20-RB1 0.8 2.0 16,000 4.0
12 SB20-RB2 2.9 2.0 58,000 14.0
13 SB20-RB3 0.9 2.0 18,000 4.0
14 SB20-RB4 7.5 2.0 149,000 36.0
15 SB-19San
CristobalSB19-RB1 5.7 2.0 113,000 27.0
16 SB-18 San Juan SB18-RB1 2.9 2.0 57,000 15.0
17
SB-17 Los Banos
SB17-RB1 1.6 2.0 32,800 13.0
18 SB17-RB2 1.0 2.0 20,200 8.0
19 SB17-RB3 2.9 2.0 58,100 23.0
20 SB17-RB4 0.3 2.0 5,800 2.0
21SB-16 Calauan
SB16-RB1 0.4 2.0 7,000 2.0
22 SB16-RB2 0.3 2.0 5,800 2.0
23
SB-15 Pila
SB15-RB1 0.8 2.0 16,900 4.0
24 SB15-RB2 4.4 2.0 87,900 23.0
25 SB15-RB3 7.1 2.0 141,300 37.0
26SB-14 Sta. Cruz
SB14-RB1 5.9 2.0 118,000 26.0
27 SB14-RB2 0.7 2.0 14,000 3.0
28 SB-02 Taytay SB02-RB1 1.0 2.0 20,000 6.0
Total 62.0 1,240,400 321.0
A-24
<9 Non-Structural Measures>
• As a countermeasure until Parañaque spillway and Lakeshore Diking System are completed,
non-structural measures (warning system, etc.) are promoted in areas where there are few
assets and the economic effect is low for arranging Lakeshore Diking System.
Table 1-3 Proposed Non-Structural Measures for Flood Mitigation of Lowland Area of Laguna de Bay
Proposed Non-Structural Measure Description
Strict Implementation of Land Use
Management Regulation in Lake
Public Area below El. 12.5m
Existing reclamation activity, houses, factories, stockyards should
strictly be regulated and controlled. Lake boundary at El. 12.5m
should be clearly determined.
Evacuation/Resettlement from Flood
Dangerous Area
Promotion of resettlement from flood dangerous areas below El.
12.5m to safety areas.
Improvement of the Disaster Risk
Management System, Preparation of
Hazard Maps and Education and
Information Campaign for Inhabitants
Some LGUs along the lakeshore area have prepared the DRRMP.
However, DRRMP for the entire Laguna Lake is not prepared yet. It
is needed. Assistance in preparation of Hazard maps along the
lakeshore and inflow rivers. Using Hazard maps, education for
inhabitants through LGUs.
Proposed Flood Forecasting and
Warning System for the Laguna de
Bay Basin
Flood forecasting and warning for flash floods of inflow rivers and
lake floods should be established. Warning system for inhabitants
along the Parañaque Spillway should be established for proper
operation.
9
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
<10 Project Implementation Plan ~Long-term plan for 30 years and priority implementation
of Parañaque Spillway~>
• Parañaque Spillway can be expected to be completed in about 5 to 9 years (depend on routes), and
flood mitigation effect is expected over the entire Laguna Lakeshore area as soon as possible. On the
other hand, Lakeshore Diking System requires a lot of resettlement and land acquisition, and is
expected to have an impact on fisheries historically. It takes a long time (20-30 years) to complete.
Therefore, it is appropriate as a flood management plan to implement Parañaque spillway as a priority
early (about 5 to 9 years for construction), and steadily implement Lakeshore Diking System over a
long period of time (about 30 years) considering reduction of water level effect of Parañaque Spillway.
Table 1-4 Project Implementation Plan
No Component
30-year Project Implementation
(2021-2050)10 years
(2021-2030)
Next 10 years
(2031-2040)
Final 10 years
(2041-2050)
I Structural Measures
1) Parañaque Spillway
2) Lakeshore Diking System*
Phase I (17.02km)
Phase II (32.83km)
Phase III (32.90km)
II Non-Structural Measures
1) Strict Implementation of Land Use Management Regulation
2) Evacuation/Resettlement from Flood Dangerous Area
3) Improvement of the Disaster Risk Management System
4) Proposed Flood Forecasting and Warning System
10
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
* Implementation of Lakeshore Diking System was assumed based on construction quantity and did not include the period for
house evacuation and land acquisition.
A-25
11
<11 Project Cost and Project Evaluation>
• Cost and Compensation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay
Parañaque Spillway (PSW)
+
Lakeshore Dike System eLDS)
Cost emillion PHP)
Construction Design and
Supervision
Price
Escalation
Physical
ContingencyCompensation Administration Vat Total
PSW LDS
PSW (Route-1) + LDS 46,203 44,945 9,115 34,286 13,455 15,293 3,266 19,596 186,158
PSW (Route-2A) + LDS 41,888 44,945 8,683 32,318 12,783 16,028 3,133 18,797 178,576
PSW (Route-2B) + LDS 41,263 44,945 8,621 32,159 12,699 16,428 3,122 18,734 177,971
PSW (Route-3) + LDS 50,736 44,945 9,568 35,486 14,074 15,941 3,415 20,490 194,654
Table 1-5 Cost of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)
Parañaque Spillway
(PSW)
+
Lakeshore Dike System
eLDS)
Parañaque Spillway Lakeshore Diking System
Compensation
Cost
(million PHP)
Land
Acquisition
(ha)
House
Evacuation
(house)
Affected
People
(person)
Compensation
Cost
(million PHP)
Land
Acquisition
(ha)
House
Evacuation
(house)
Affected
People
(person)
PSW (Route-1) + LDS 2,147 12.8 340 1,390
13,146 1,284.9 2,913 11,524PSW (Route-2A) + LDS 2,882 7.7 360 1,470
PSW (Route-2B) + LDS 3,283 12.9 360 1,470
PSW (Route-3) + LDS 2,795 6.8 360 1,470
Table 1-6 Compensation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)
11
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
<11 Project Cost and Project Evaluation>
• Project Evaluation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay
12
Parañaque Spillway (PSW)
+Lakeshore Dike System eLDS)
Annual
Benefit
emillion PHP)
NPV of B
emillion PHP)
NPV of C
emillion PHP)EIRR
NPV
emillion PHP)B/C
PSW (Route-1) + LDS 22,475 80,132 41,043 16.3% 39,088 1.95
PSW (Route-2A) + LDS 21,279 95,871 42,474 19.6% 53,397 2.26
PSW (Route-2B) + LDS 21,181 95,459 42,427 19.7% 53,032 2.25
PSW (Route-3) + LDS 23,751 84,165 44,060 16.2% 40,105 1.91
Table 1-7 Evaluation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
A-26
13
<12 Parañaque Spillway Project Cost and Project Evaluation>
Parañaque Spillway (PSW)
Parañaque Spillway
Compensation
Cost
(million PHP)
Land
Acquisition
(ha)
House
Evacuation
(house)
Affected
People
(person)
Construction
Period
(month)
PSW (Route-1) 2,147 12.8 340 1,390 98
PSW (Route-2A) 2,882 7.7 360 1,470 60
PSW (Route-2B) 3,283 12.9 360 1,470 64
PSW (Route-3) 2,795 6.8 360 1,470 105
Table 1-8 Compensation of Parañaque Spillway (with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
Parañaque Spillway
(PSW)
Cost emillion PHP)
ConstructionDesign and
Supervision
Price
Escalation
Physical
ContingencyCompensation Administration Vat Total
PSW (Route-1) 46,203 4,620 7,797 5,862 2,147 1,333 7,996 75,959
PSW (Route-2A) 41,888 4,189 5,830 5,191 2,882 1,200 7,197 68,376
PSW (Route-2B) 41,263 4,126 5,671 5,106 3,283 1,189 7,134 67,771
PSW (Route-3) 50,736 5,074 8,997 6,481 2,795 1,482 8,890 84,454
Table 1-9 Cost of Parañaque Spillway (with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)
<12 Parañaque Spillway Project Cost and Project Evaluation>
Parañaque Spillway
(PSW)
Annual
Benefit
emillion PHP)
NPV of B
emillion PHP)
NPV of C
emillion PHP)EIRR B/C
PSW (Route-1) 19,676 69,586 26,013 18.9% 2.68
PSW (Route-2A) 18,480 86,201 27,444 23.1% 3.14
PSW (Route-2B) 18,382 85,790 27,397 23.1% 3.13
PSW (Route-3) 20,952 73,619 29,030 18.6% 2.54
Table 1-10 Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway Project(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)
1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna
de Bay
14
A-27
Appendix 1
Appendix 1-3 Joint Meeting Part-2
A-28
CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. eCTII)
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. eNK)
Follow -up Study on Parañaque Spillway Project
JOINT MEETING
Part-2 Detailed Explanation of
Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
Japan International Cooperation Agency
May 8, 2020
■Topics
Part-1
1. Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay
Part-2
2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.2 Additional Economic Benefit which Include the Characteristic of Laguna
de Bay Inundation Phenomena (long-term inundation)
2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate
Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River
2.2.4 Result of Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.3 Improvement Effects Other Than Economic Evaluation
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
2.5 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan in Conservation and Sustainable
Development of Laguna de Bay2
A-29
3
2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)
1) Setting the Planning Scale in Laguna de Bay
According to the 2018 survey, the design scale at Laguna de Bay was set at 100-year
return period in accordance with the DPWH guidelines (DGCS,2015).
ClassificationEvaluation
IndexDesign Scale
Setting Rationale
Flood caused by the water level rise of Laguna de Bay
Water Level
100-year Since Laguna de Bay is considered as one of the important basins in the Philippines, the design scale is set to a 100-year which is equivalent to the value of the Pasig - Marikina River Basin.
The water level observed data of Laguna de Bay has been accumulated over a long period of time as compared to the rainfall data. Therefore, the water level probability scale is adopted.
Table 2-1-1 Design Scale of Laguna de Bay in 2018 Study
General Criteria for Flood Control, DGCS2015 volume 3
i. Design Flood ii. Climate ChangeClimate change should be considered as a
part of the design and scoping for the
project.
River Type Design Flood
Principal and Major Rivers(40 km2 drainage area and above) 100 year
For Small Rivers (below 40 km2 drainage area) 50 year
Source; Design Guidelines, Criteria & Standards volume 3 Water Engineering
project, 2015 DPWH
4
2) Climate Change
• In the 2018 survey, future changes in rainfall in the
study area were organized using the results of the
Regional Climate Model (RCM) implemented by
PAGASA, and the impact on the Laguna de Bay lake
level was examined.
• In this follow-up study, study team discussed with
PAGASA (January 27, 2020) and confirmed the latest
climate change model (2018 version). Currently,
PAGASA forecasts future weather based on RCP
scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways,
IPCC Fifth Report).
• PAGASA makes predictions based on RCP4.5 and
RCP8.5 scenarios. Using the prediction results for
each Province described in the report "Observed
Climate Trends and Projected Climate Change in the
Philippines, 2018" obtained from PAGASA, the impact
on the Laguna Lake water level taking into account
climate change was examined.Source: PAGASA (Observed Climate Trends and
Projected Climate Change in the Philippines,2018)
Table 2-1-2 Result of Climate Change
Evaluation(PAGASA) 2018:Related Provinces of the Laguna de Bay Lakeshore area
2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)
Predicting rainfall increase and decrease due to
climate change ePAGASA)
A-30
5
Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal NCR Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal NCR Average Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal12~2 124.9 629.2 827.7 262.4 107.5 55.7 43.9 31.6 51.5 55.5 47.64 194.5 905.2 397.4 397.43~5 242.8 386.8 382.7 241.5 198.5 17.9 24.8 18.9 25.6 25.7 22.58 286.2 482.6 303.4 303.46~8 985.7 845 670 1001.3 1170.2 9.4 -2.1 5.3 -1.7 -0.4 2.1 1,078.6 827.3 983.9 983.99~11 579 1065.5 1229.3 821.8 758.7 6.7 5.7 7.6 12.7 7.7 8.08 618.0 1,127.0 926.5 926.5
Present Condition 1971-2000
Rainfall (mm)MonthFuture 2036-2065 (RCP4.5)
Rainfall (mm)Rate of Rainfall change (%)
Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal NCR Total12~2 3.7 21.7 0.8 17.1 4.5 47.83~5 1.2 12.3 0.5 8.5 2.1 24.56~8 0.6 -1.0 0.1 -0.6 -0.0 -0.9
9~11 0.5 2.8 0.2 4.2 0.6 8.3Average 1.5 8.9 0.4 7.3 1.8 19.9
Month Rate of Rainfall change (%)_Weighted averageFuture 2036-2065 (RCP4.5)
Table 2-1-3 The Result of 3-month Rain Change Rate by RCP4.5
Table 2-1-4 Area Weight Average of Relevant
Province
• Predicted rainfall based on the RCP scenario will increase by about 50% from
December to February and increase by about 25% from March to May, while it will
decrease by 0.9% from June to August in the rainy season and from September to
November is forecast to increase by about 8%
Sea Level Raise
Based on RCP 4.5 scenarios (Representative
Concentration Pathways, IPCC Fifth Report)
of PAGASA, sea level raise is set 20 cm raise. Source: PAGASA (Observed Climate Trends and
Projected Climate Change in the Philippines,2018)
2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)
6
2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan
2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)
In order to determine the Design Flood Level (DFL) of Laguna de Bay, It is necessary to
comprehensively evaluate the following 3 issues;
- Consistency with existing flood control facilities,
- Flood control safety level, and
- Cost and B/C.
1) Consistency with Existing Flood Control Facilities
West of Manggahan Lakeshore Dike was completed in 2007 with DFL of 13.8m under the
Metro Manila Flood Control Project - West of Manggahan Floodway.
2) Flood Control Safety Level
The DFL shall not increase inundation risk
compared to the recent maximum water level
of 13.85m during Typhoon Ondoy in 2009.
The planned DFL will be set to 13.8 m or less
in consideration of the past flood levels.
3) Cost and B/C
A higher safety level (Lower DFL) is desirable,
14.03m(1972)
13.58m(1978)13.55m(1988)
13.85m(2009)13.83m(2012)
10
11
12
13
14
15
1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Wat
er L
evel
(m
)
Figure Historical Maximum Lake Water Level
Typhoon Ondoy
Maximum WL:13.85m
From the above comprehensive evaluation, 13.8m is determined as the Design Flood Level of
Laguna de Bay.
but if the safety level is further increased, the project cost will be increased, and the B/C will
be decreased.
A-31
7
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
1) Revised Operation Level of Parañaque Spillway
In this study, the initial operation level of Parañaque Spillway was revised as follows; to
lower the lake level of Laguna de Bay before the flood season and to increase the storage
capacity during the flood.
In addition, the starting operation level of the four (4) drainage stations installed at West
Manggahan Lakeshore dike is 11.5m.
<Operation Level of Parañaque Spillway>
・January~May(Non-flooding Period) :non operation
・June~July(water level raising Period) :11.5m
・August~December(water level lowering Period) :12.0m
→Due to a severe water shortage in Metro Manila (March 2019), to avoid the impact on water intake during
the dry season of water treatment facilities that utilize Laguna de Bay as a water resources, Parañaque
Spillway will not operate during non-flooding season (January to May) .
There are two (2) existing water purification facilities of Maynilad and Manila Water, Laguna de Bay as a water
resources.
In consultation with Maynilad and Manila Water, we confirmed the water level at Laguna de Bay, which will affect
water intake. However, there has been no event that water cannot be collected due to the low water level at
Laguna de Bay. It is said that the water quality (salinity) of Laguna de Bay affects the water intake
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Dis
cha
rge
of
Pa
ran
aq
ue
Sp
illw
ay
(m
3/s
)
Lak
eW
ate
rLe
ve
l(m
)
Return Period 100-year Existing Condition RCP4.5_without PSW
RCP4.5_withPSW RCP4.5_PSW_Discharge
8
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
• Laguna de Bay Lake level, taking into account climate change, is 14.5m with a 100-year return period without
Parañaque Spillway.
• Water level will be increased due to increase precipitation during non-flooding period and then water level before
flood period of June will be more than 11.5m and Parañaque Spillway can operate from early June. Therefore water
level before flooding period will be same level as 100-year return period without climate change and Parañaque
Spillway.
• 100-year probability with the Parañaque Spillway (Diameter D=13.0m) can reduce the water level to 13.8m (DFL) .
• Parañaque Spillway is a facility that responds to climate change.
No.
Climate
ChangeParañaque Spillway WL (m)
100-yr Yes No Yes No Diameter
1 ✔ ✔ - 14.3m
2 ✔ ✔ - 14.5m
3 ✔ ✔ 12.0m 13.9m
4 ✔ ✔ 13.0m 13.8m
Figure 2-2-1 Analysis Results of Water Level Fluctuation
(100-year,D=13m)
70cm
Decline 13.8m
14.5m
Parañaque Spillway
discharge
During this period, the rising
water level due to climate
change will be released by the
Parañaque Spillway.
Operation Level:11.5m
Operation Level:12.0m
A-32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Inun
datio
n da
ys
without PSW with PSW
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
Dis
ch
arge
of P
SW
(m
3/S
)
La
ke S
urf
ace
Level
(m)
2008/1/1 〜2013/12/31 Operation Level SML WL without PSW wPSW_June-July:11.5 Augst-December:12 Discharge of PSW
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
Dis
ch
arge
of
PS
W (
m3
/S)
Lake S
urf
ace
Level
(m)
2002/1/1 〜2007/12/31 Operation Level SML WL without PSW wPSW_June-July:11.5 Augst-December:12 Discharge of PSW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
9
Figure 2-2-2 Long-term prediction Result from 2002 to 2013 with operation level Jun-Juy:11.5m Aug-Dec:12m
(Diameter of Tunnel is 13.0m)
Typhoon OndoyHabagat
Non-Operation Non-Operation
13.8m→13.2m0.6m decline
13.8m→13.3m0.5m decline
66 days
50daysNo flooding
No flooding
72 days reduction
Typhoon Ondoy
Reduction of Inundation Period
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
WL withoutPSW ①
With PSW②
①-②WL withoutPSW ③
With PSW④
days(③-④)
2002 12.6 12.6 12.2 0.4 8 0 82003 11.7 11.6 11.6 0.0 0 0 02004 11.9 11.7 11.7 0.0 0 0 02005 12.2 12.1 12.0 0.1 0 0 02006 12.3 12.3 12.2 0.1 0 0 02007 12.5 12.5 12.3 0.1 0 0 02008 12.1 12.2 12.0 0.2 0 0 02009 13.9 13.8 13.2 0.6 110 38 722010 12.1 12.1 11.6 0.5 0 0 02011 12.7 12.7 12.2 0.5 17 0 172012 13.8 13.8 13.3 0.5 108 42 662013 13.0 13.1 12.6 0.5 62 12 50
Min 11.7 11.6 11.6 0.0 0 0 0Ave 12.6 12.5 12.3 0.3 25 8 18Max 13.9 13.8 13.3 0.6 110 42 72
days of more than 12.5mSML
Observed
Maximum Water level
Non-Operation
10
I. In the past, the Parañaque Spillway has been considered several times but has not
been realized. The main reason for this was that, besides the size of the project
funds, social impacts such as relocation and land acquisition were very large.
II. In the 2018 survey, from the viewpoint of minimizing its social impact, it was
examined in the “draft of underground waterway “ applying the recently enacted
Philippine law `` Private land rights do not occur below 50 m underground ‘’.
III. In this follow-up study, from the viewpoint of reducing its project cost, 2018 study
was reviewed and revised the routes of Parañaque Spillway to shorten the
shorten of vertical shaft considering that construction of shafts (entrance and
exit) was a large part of construction cost and construction period.
IV. This proposed route can omit the construction of the shaft at the entrance of the
spillway, reduce the cost and the construction period, can construct most of the
tunnels on national land, and also reduce the social impact.
2) Setting a Route Plan* to Reduce Costs
* Detail study of routes shall be executed in Feasibility Study
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
A-33
11
Route-2 in 2018 study
Revised Route-2-ASucat – San DionisioL-tunnel=7.2km L-open=0.7km
Figure 2-2-3 Alignment Plan Drawing of Parañaque Spillway, 2020
Alignment of Parañaque Spillway in 2020 Follow-up St udy
- Route-1 : Lower Bicutan – South Parañaque (same route as 2018)- Revised Route-2-A :Sucat – San Dionisio- Revised Route-2-B :Sucat – Zapote- Route-3 : Sucat – Zapote(same route as 2018)
Revised Rout-2-A Longitudinal Profile
Revised Route-2-BSucat – ZapoteL-tunnel=8.7km L-open=0.7km
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
12
Table 2-2-1 Cost Breakdown of Parañaque Spillway (Shield method, D=13m)
Route
Cost(million PHP)
Project
Cost
Construction Cost
Total TunnelVertical
Shaft
Open
Channel
River
Improvement
Soil
Disposal
Route 1 75,959 46,203 22,091 13,636 5,392 2,827 2,257
Route 2-A 68,376 41,888 25,665 4,629 4,062 5,671 1,861
Route 2-B 67,771 41,263 29,682 4,618 4,062 709 2,192
Route 3 84,454 50,736 29,926 13,620 4,044 706 2,440
Route
Compensation
Cost
(million PHP)
Land
Acquisition
(ha)
House
Evacuation
(house)
People affected
(person)
Construction
Period
(month)
Route 1 2,147 12.8 340 1,390 98
Route 2-A 2,882 7.7 360 1,470 60
Route 2-B 3,283 12.9 360 1,470 64
Route 3 2,795 6.8 360 1,470 105
Table 2-2-2 Compensation Cost, Land Acquisition, House Evacuation, Affected
people, Construction period (Shield method, D=13m)
2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway
A-34
13
In this follow-up study, considering the flood characteristics of
Laguna de Bay (long-term inundation), attempted to calculate the
following benefits that were not quantified in the 2018 study.
1)Reduction of damage to household business suspension
Flooded house count (every 0.5m) x shortened days x
minimum labor (356PHP / day)
=150 million PHP/year
2)Reduction of fishery damage due to flooding Estimated to be nine (9) million pesos / day based on the amount of damage and days of
flooding during the typhoon in 2009.
Inundation reduction days in each probability year x Day damage amount x
Probability of occurrence
=160 million PHP/year
2.2.2 Additional Economic Benefit which Include the Characteristic of Laguna de Bay Inundation Phenomena (long-term inundation)
:Existing
:Scheduled Installation(Phase IV)
:Not installed
PMRCIP Phase II PMRCIP Phase III
PM
RC
IP P
ha
se I
VP
MR
CIP
P
ha
se V
14
1) Hydraulic Systems in Pasig-Marikina River basin and Laguna de Bay
An integrated study of the Pasig-Marikina River basin and Laguna de Bay is required.
Parañaque Spillway
MCGS
Napindan gate
Rosario Weir
Taytay gate
Cainta gate
■River Channel Network
【Downstream channel Network from
Rosario point】- Phase II river channel
- Phase III river channel
- Diversion/ Discharge System
- MCGS
- Rosario weir
- Manggahan Floodway
- Cainta gate
- Taytay gate
- Napindan control gate
- Parañaque Spillway
【Upstream Channel Network from
Rosario point】- Phase IV river channel
- Phase V river channel
※Bold characters already exist
2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River
■Flood Storage Facility
- Marikina dam and Retarding Basin
A-35
Manila
Bay
Pasig-Marikina
River Basin
Ration of inflow volume of A)、B)、C) 1/100 return period
15
2) Three (3) Types of Lake Water Discharged from Parañaque Spillway
■Rainfall Runoff to Lakeshore basin
Water A):Precipitation directly on the surface of
Laguna de Bay
Water B): Inflow from lakeshore area of Laguna
de Bay (21 river basins)
■Flowing from Other Basins
Water C): Water released from Pasig-Marikina
river basin to Laguna de Bay via
Manggahan floodway
Water C) through Manggahan
Floodway can contribute to mitigate
flood damage in Pasig-Marikina River
Basin
The benefits created by the release of the
Parañaque spillway are the sum of the
benefits created by each of the above A), B)
and C).
Item Water A) Water B) Water C)
Inflow Volume(MCM) 565 1,392 258
Ratio 25.5% 62.9% 11.7%
Ratio of water volume A), B), C) from July 29 to August 16 in
100-year Laguna Lake water level forecast results
C) Inflow from Pasig-Marikina river basin via
Manggahan Floodway:11.7%Water C)
B) Laguna de Bay Lakeshore
Basin:62.9%
(21 River Basins)
Water B)
B)
B)
B)
A) Precipitation on the surface:25.5%
Water A)
2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River
16
1) Economic Evaluation Results
Parañaque
Spillway
Route※1
Project
Cost
emillion
PHP)
NPV of B※2 emillion PHP)
NPV of C
emillion PHP)EIRR B/CPasig-
Marikina
Basin
Laguna
Lake
Shore
Total
Route-1 75,959 47,953 21,651 69,586 26,013 18.9% 2.68
Revised
Route-2-A68,376 58,774 27,427 86,201 27,444 23.1% 3.14
Revised
Route-2-B67,771 58,363 27,427 85,790 27,397 23.1% 3.13
Route-3 84,454 51,968 21,651 73,619 29,030 18.6% 2.54
※1: Detail study of routes shall be executed in Feasibility Study
※2: Additional economic benefit items (household business suspension, fishery damage) were included
.
Table 2-2-3 Economic Evaluation Results (Diameter of Parañaque Spillway is 13m and Tunneling Method is Shield)
2.2.3 Result of Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway
In this 2020 follow-up study, EIRR was 18.6% to 23.1% as a result of reviewing the
“Climate change adaptation”, “operation level and route”, “benefit generation
area” and “additional economic benefit” of the Parañaque Spillway.
A-36
17
2.3 Improvement Effects other than Economic Evaluation
• At the time of the 1/100 probable flood, Laguna lakeshore area had a 20cm
water level rise due to inflow from Manggahan Floodway (planned maximum
discharge 2,400m3/s), but Parañaque Spillway (Diameter=13.0m,maximum
discharge 240m3/s) eliminates this impact and has the effect of lowering the
water level by 50cm (total 70cm decline).
CaseParañaque
Spillway
Manggahan
Floodway
WL(m)
100yr flood
Initial ―without PSW
―without MFW
14.3
Current ―without PSW
✔With MFW
14.5
With the Project ✔with PSW
✔With MFW
13.8
50cm
decline
:Inflow from Pasig-Marikina River basin though Manggahan Floodway
EL.12.5m (PD No. 813)
EL.13.8m eproposed DFL)
EL.14.5m (100-yr flood level)
Public Land responsible by LLDA
(RA 4850 and PD 813)
70cm decline
EL.14.3m (100-yr flood level exclude without Manggahan Flood way)
Notes:
• Lake water level of El. 12.50m is average
annual maximum lake level (based on the
RA No. 4850 and PD No. 813)
70cm*1
decline
EL.15.0m
Lakeshore Dike*2
*2:Lakeshore Diking System is formulated in the comprehensive
flood management plan for Laguna de Bay lakeshore area.
*1:Storage space of Laguna de
Bay will be secured by pre-
discharge through the
Paranaque spillway prior to
the water level raising period
and the water level can be
lowered by 90cm.
2.3 Improvement Effects other than Economic Evaluation
Table 2-3-1 Probable Lake Water Level (D=13m)
○Parañaque Spillway shortens the inundation period of 12.5 m or more by about 2 months and reduces
economic and social damage. ※Reduced from 142 days to 75 days
Return periodExisting
Condition
Without project
Climate Change
RCP4.5
With PSW
Climate Change
RCP4.5
200 14.7 14.9 14.1
100 14.3 14.5 13.8
50 14.0 14.2 13.6
30 13.7 13.9 13.3
20 13.6 13.8 13.2
10 13.2 13.4 12.9
5 12.9 13.1 12.8
3 12.6 12.8 12.6
2 12.3 12.5 12.3
18
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Dis
cha
rge
of
Pa
ran
aq
ue
Sp
illw
ay
(m3
/s)
Lake
Wa
ter
Leve
l(m
)
Return Period 100-year Existing Condition RCP4.5_without PSW
RCP4.5_withPSW RCP4.5_PSW_Discharge
:12.5m or more flooded
Without PSW
Maximum Level 14.5m(100-yr flood)
With PSW
Maximum Level 13.8m( 100-yr flood )
After 2 months later
No flooding
damage
Flood for about 2
months after this
Without PSW Maximum Level:13.8m
(Flood Area:66.1km2
Affected people513,000)
With PSW Maximum Level 12.5m
(Flood Area:0km2
Affected people zero)
Junior High
school
University
Elementary
school
Muntinlupa
Alaban
Muntinlupa
Alaban
※Include Climate Change
Elementary
school
Junior High
school
University
Elementary
school
Elementary
school
Junior High
school
University
Elementary
school
Muntinlupa
Alaban
Elementary
school
Junior High
school
University
Elementary
school
Muntinlupa
Alaban
Elementary
school
Operation level:12.0m
Operation level:11.5m
14.5m → 13.8m0.7m decline
Parañaque Spillway
discharge
2 months
shortening
A-37
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2009
Inu
nd
ati
on
da
ys
without PSW with PSW
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Dis
cha
rge
(m
3/s
)
Lake
Su
rfa
ce L
eve
l (m
)
2009 SML WL_without PSW SML WL_with PSW
PSW_Operation Level PFW-W 10.00
19
2.3 Improvement Effects Exclusive of Economic Evaluation
13.2m
13.8m
60cm Decline
Operation
Level:11.5m Operation Level:12.0m
Parañaque Spillway
discharge
78 days reduction
110 days
38 days
○Parañaque Spillway can shorten the inundation period of 12.5 m or more by about 2 months and
reduces economic and social damage in 2009 Typhoon Ondoy.
:12.5m or more flooded
2009.11.10 WL=13.5 m
Without Parañaque Spillway
2009.9.28 WL=13.8 m
Without Parañaque Spillway
Binan
San
Pedoro
Without Parañaque Spillway
2009.9.28 WL=13.2 m
With Parañaque Spillway
With Parañaque Spillway
2009.11.10 WL=12.5 mWith Parañaque Spillway
No flooding
Flooding untilmiddle ofDecember
Effect of Shortening Flooding Period
The maximum lake water level will be decline from 13.8m
to 13.2 (0.6m decline) with Parañaque Spillway.
Inundation period (days) will be shorten 78 days (without
PSW:110 days, with PSW:38 days)
After 44 days
After 44 days
20
2.3 Improvement Effects Exclusive of Economic Evaluation
Calamba
Laguna de BaySan Pedro
Laguna de Bay
:Inundation Area EL.13.8 (without PSW)
:Inundation Area EL.13.2 (with PSW)
Typhoon Ondoy 2009.9.28
Elementary
school
Barangay
Hall
Cabuyao City
Laguna de Bay
:Inundation Area EL.13.8 (without PSW)
:Inundation Area EL.13.2 (with PSW)
Typhoon Ondoy 2009.9.28
Elementary
school
High school
Residential Area
○In the case of Typhoon Ondoy, there are some
areas where the Parañaque spillway can eliminate
flood damage.
Inundation
elimination
area
Inundation
elimination
area
Inundation
elimination area
A-38
21
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
• Parañaque Spillway will contribute to reduce the inundation depth and shorten the inundation period
on the lakeshore area, but it will not eliminate inundation damage.
• Also, if the Lakeshore Diking System is constructed (Phase I to Phase III), flooding in the constructed
section will be zero, but inundation damage will occur on the east side of Laguna de Bay.
• Therefore, it is necessary to take measures not only for structural measures (hard measures) but also
for non-structural measures (soft measures) in order to protect human lives and minimize inundation
damage.
After Construction of Parañaque Spillway
100-yr flood WL:13.8m
Laguna de Bay
:flooding area
West
Manggahan
Lakeshore Dike
Parañaque spillway will
contribute to reduce the
depth of inundation on
the lakeshore area,
shorten the period of
inundation, and prevent
inundation in some areas,
but will not eliminate
inundation damage in
the entire area.
After Construction of Parañaque Spillway
and Lakeshore Diking System
100-yr flood WL: 13.8m
ラグナ湖
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Inundation damage on the
west side of Laguna de Bay
will be zero
:flooding area
Laguna de Bay
Inundation damage
occurs on the east
side of Laguna de Bay
22
CategoryStractural
Measures
Non-stractural
MeasuresAllowable Area Allowable Level
Priority Project Paranaque
Spillway
Strengthen early
warning system,
create /
share flooded
area map, etc.
All areas are
covered except the
West Mangahan
lakeshore dike Area
Since lake water level with 100-year
return period will be 13.8 m, housing,
offices, schools, etc. less than 13.8 m
will be inundated by up to 1.3 m.
The maximum flooding period for a
100-year flood is 1.2 months (1.2
months of flooding at an altitude of
12.5 m).
Comprehensive
Flood Control
Plan eDraft)
Paranaque
Spillway
Strengthen early
warning system,
create /
share flooded
area map, etc.
Areas where the
lake bank system is
not implemented
Target LGUs are
shown in Chapter 4
(4.6.3), 6th
prioritize area and
7th prioritize area.
In West Mangahan area and
lakeshore diking system
implemented area (Phase1 to
Phase3), inundation damage will be
zero until 100-year flood due to the
effect of Paranaque spillway and
lakeshore diking system.
As shown in the priority project
category, the east side of Laguna de
Bay, where lakeshore diking system is
not implemanted, has a maximum
flooding period of approximately 1.2
months and a maximum flooding
depth of 1.3 m during a 100-year
flood.
Lakeshore Dikng
System
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
A-39
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
23
• After construction of Parañaque Spillway, people affected by inundation can be mitigated from 930,000
to 513,000 (about 55%) and continuously after construction of Lakeshore Diking System (Phase I, II, III)
people affected by inundation can be mitigated from 513,000 to 107,000 (about 12%).
Figure 2-3-1 Analysis Results of Effect of Parañaque Spillway (D=13m)
and Lakeshore Diking System (100-year, Including Climate Change)
853,000(98.6 km2)
After Construction of Parañaque Spillway
⇒ 340,000 peoples (No inundation)
After Construction of Lakeshore Diking System
⇒ 406,000 peoples (No inundation)
513,000(66.1 km2)
107,000(26.7 km2)
Build-up Area : 3.9 km2
Agricultural Area : 19.6 km2
Swamp, etc. : 3.2 km2
24
EL.12.5m (PD No. 813)
EL.13.8m eproposed DFL)
EL.14.5m (100-yr flood level)
Public Land responsible by LLDA (RA 4850 and PD 813)
Proposed Lake Management Area including Lakeshore Management
70cm decline
Easement Zone
(PD No. 1067)
Lakeshore Dike*
Notes:
• Lake water level of El. 12.50m is average annual maximum lake level (based on the RA No. 4850 and PD No. 813)
• Easement zone: 3 m for urban area and 20 m for agricultural area (based on the PD No. 1067: Water Code)
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
Non-structural MeasuresI. Lakeshore Management
• RA No. 4850 (1966) and PD No. 813 state that Laguna Lake below El. 12.50m is public land for
management by LLDA.
II. Proposal of Establishing Lakeshore Management System
• Set the lakeshore dike elevation : El. 13.8m + free board (1.2m)
• Set easement zones from the Lakeshore bank (3m for urban area, 20m for agricultural area etc.)
• Manage between the easement zone to the other side of the Lake
• Lakeshore management is to be conducted by LLDA under cooperation by LGUs and the related
agencies (DPWH, DENR, DA etc.).
*Lakeshore Diking System is formulated in the comprehensive
flood management plan for Laguna de Bay lakeshore area.
A-40
25
2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level
Laguna de Bay
Manila Bay
After Construction Parañaque Spillway
100-yr Flood WL:13.8m
Elementary
School
University
High School
Muntinlupa
Technical Institute
①Non-structural measures for the
operation of Parañaque spillway
esoft measures)
Water level observation related to
the operation of Parañaque
spillway
Issuance of warnings regarding the
operation of Parañaque spillway
Construction of an information
network on the operation of the
Parañaque spillway
② Non-structural measures for raising
Laguna lake water level
Lake level observation
Issuing a warning about the rising Laguna
Lake water level
Construction of information network
Create and hazard map and share
Information
Sharing
1.3m
Sign of flooding depth
Flood-related sign installation image
Drainage facilities
and drainage river
Drainage facilities
and inflow river
Warning System for Lake Level Rise eexisting)
Radio wave
level gauge
Solar
receiving
instrument
• Warning system
installed in 'Sucat
People's Park' in Sucat,
Muntinlupa.
• According to an on-site
interview survey, it is
managed by the city and
installed last year (2019),
and a warning is issued
when Laguna Lake water
level rises.Source:Study Team(2020/02/13)
Even after the Parañaque Spillway, the early warning system will
be strengthened as a non-structural measure, and inundation
area maps will be created and shared.
Elementary School
2.5 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan in Conservation and Sustainable Development of Laguna de Bay
- Laguna de Bay is variously utilized for irrigation water, hydropower
generation, industrial water, resource of domestic water supply.
Moreover, the lake is used for inland fishery, water transport etc.
- Due to expansion of Metro Manila, rapid increase in population and
development in the lakeshore area causes the issues such as the
decrease in lake water quality and increase in flood damage, etc.
- LLDA has updated a Master Plan in 1995; Master Plan: 2016 and
beyond. In the updated Master Plan, the vulnerability of flood
hazards and related health and economic risks is prioritized as the
most critical for Laguna basin administrative authorities.
- Comprehensive Flood Management Plan including Parañaque Spillway
meets the above and is positioned as the most important innovation
to support safety and stability in people’s life and economic activities
along the lakeshore area. Moreover, the Master Plan can mitigate
flood inundation in center of Metro Manila in combined operation
with existing Mangahan Floodway.
- Increase in damages by natural disasters caused by climate change is a
serious issue in order to aim the sustainable development. Parañaque
Spillway is also very effective on the mitigation of increase in lake
water level caused by climate change, resulting in reduction of flood
damage.
Rapid Population Growth
Source : LLDA
Master Plan: 2016 and beyond
Inland Fishery
26
A-41
Appendix 2
Materials Related to Economic Analysis
A-42
Appendix 2-1 List of LGUs Subject to Flood Damage Analysis
ID Province Name of LGUPopulation
(2015 census)Increase Rate
(2015-20)Population in
2020
1 NCR CITY OF MUNTINLUPA 504,509 0.98% 529,719
2 NCR TAGUIG 804,915 0.98% 845,136
3 LAGUNA BAY 62,143 1.85% 68,108
4 LAGUNA BINAN 333,028 1.85% 364,994
5 LAGUNA CABUYAO 308,745 1.85% 338,380
6 LAGUNA CALAUAN 80,453 1.85% 88,175
7 LAGUNA CITY OF CALAMBA 454,486 1.85% 498,110
8 LAGUNA FAMY 16,587 1.85% 18,179
9 LAGUNA KALAYAAN 23,269 1.85% 25,503
10 LAGUNA LOS BANOS 112,008 1.85% 122,759
11 LAGUNA LUMBAN 30,652 1.85% 33,594
12 LAGUNA MABITAC 20,530 1.85% 22,501
13 LAGUNA PAETE 25,096 1.85% 27,505
14 LAGUNA PAGSANJAN 42,164 1.85% 46,211
15 LAGUNA PAKIL 20,659 1.85% 22,642
16 LAGUNA PANGIL 24,274 1.85% 26,604
17 LAGUNA PILA 50,289 1.85% 55,116
18 LAGUNA SAN PEDRO 325,809 1.85% 357,082
19 LAGUNA SANTA CRUZ (Capital) 117,605 1.85% 128,893
20 LAGUNA SANTA ROSA 353,767 1.85% 387,724
21 LAGUNA SINILOAN 38,067 1.85% 41,721
22 LAGUNA VICTORIA 39,321 1.85% 43,095
23 RIZAL ANGONO 113,283 2.08% 125,565
24 RIZAL BARAS 69,300 2.08% 76,813
25 RIZAL JALA-JALA 32,254 2.08% 35,751
26 RIZAL MORONG 58,118 2.08% 64,419
27 RIZAL PILILLA 64,812 2.08% 71,839
28 RIZAL TANAY 117,830 2.08% 130,605
29 RIZAL TAYTAY 319,104 2.08% 353,700
30 RIZAL CARDONA 49,034 2.08% 54,350
31 RIZAL BINANGONAN 282,474 2.08% 313,099
Total 4,894,585 5,317,892
A-43
A-44
Appendix 2-2 Damage to House and Household Goods by Height (PHP)
Eco
nom
ic D
ama
ge o
f Ho
useh
old
Bui
ldin
g a
nd A
sset
(inc.
indi
rect
)1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
Met
roM
anila
Met
roM
anila
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
na
Tagu
ig C
ityM
untin
lupa
City
San
Ped
roB
inan
San
ta R
osa
Cab
uyao
City
of
Cal
amba
Los
Ban
os
Bay
Cal
auan
Vic
toria
Pila
San
ta C
ruz
<=
12
.50
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
<=
12
.61
83
,605
18
,232
11
8,34
04
7,03
49
,93
98
,29
32
,93
34
1,9
60
6,0
57
10
,35
03,
96
95,
80
67,
59
40
7,0
25
1,6
94
22
,66
9
<=
12
.73
99
,935
82
,651
23
1,08
68
6,19
85
4,0
28
28
,62
39
,14
87
3,9
11
18
,02
62
4,5
19
10
,37
96,
35
11
6,4
14
016
,75
15
,05
23
3,6
03
<=
12
.81
,08
2,3
051
55
,419
67
8,29
62
48,
589
10
0,7
86
54
,63
32
2,6
86
22
4,4
14
46
,79
66
3,7
68
24
,35
92
5,1
54
42,
02
62
35
44,2
29
9,8
28
117
,31
8
<=
12
.91
,86
5,0
283
59
,173
1,1
10,
917
39
4,93
72
32
,23
71
26
,93
74
4,1
67
34
9,9
03
93
,64
91
17
,15
35
1,1
81
33,
14
37
1,8
22
27
373
,54
621
,49
716
3,6
14
<=
13
.02
,70
7,1
264
87
,819
1,6
47,
919
57
1,38
83
18
,23
51
69
,58
47
2,3
71
49
4,5
05
13
9,7
58
19
0,8
96
68
,98
44
5,6
05
95,
67
61,
07
51
05,3
86
28,9
54
244
,78
2
<=
13
.13
,97
0,4
186
69
,932
2,4
42,
148
85
8,33
84
07
,83
12
62
,10
11
13
,50
57
32
,96
32
08
,37
92
76
,15
51
20,
83
68
0,4
23
13
7,5
53
1,3
45
139
,64
144
,87
636
3,1
04
<=
13
.25
,52
0,0
931
,06
5,5
313
,27
1,72
31
,18
2,83
86
54
,81
34
10
,71
81
86
,69
89
28
,36
52
70
,71
74
37
,35
61
63,
26
89
1,1
06
17
8,8
11
1,8
65
183
,54
571
,40
644
1,8
11
<=
13
.36
,97
4,8
261
,26
9,9
474
,18
7,95
81
,51
6,92
17
63
,93
25
06
,01
52
76
,16
61,
14
7,6
44
34
4,2
19
53
7,1
68
23
6,7
661
25,
21
92
12,
02
12,
80
72
30,1
70
89,0
85
570
,34
1
<=
13
.48
,67
0,0
911
,68
0,4
475
,10
8,61
11
,88
1,03
31
,02
8,5
94
65
1,8
52
38
9,3
32
1,3
69
,76
44
05
,34
46
75
,10
72
97,
90
31
55,
79
12
36,
05
92,
88
72
58,4
67
111
,88
367
2,0
74
<=
13
.51
0,3
27
,108
2,0
12
,021
6,0
45,
054
2,2
70,
032 1
,18
3,5
17
82
8,5
04
49
4,7
50
1,5
60
,19
04
67
,65
18
45
,69
93
88,
83
91
95,
49
82
62,
21
33,
32
22
93,6
46
146
,66
774
8,9
21
<=
13
.61
3,0
22
,914
2,4
27
,081
7,6
50,
938
2,9
44,
895 1
,38
4,9
87
1,0
42
,09
46
52
,92
71,
93
7,8
89
57
6,4
30
1,0
50
,47
65
07,
63
62
57,
20
33
22,
28
43,
69
23
68,7
04
193
,62
597
3,7
24
<=
13
.71
5,9
93
,692
3,2
88
,700
9,1
64,
897
3,5
40,
0951
,92
6,7
16
1,3
61
,98
48
02
,95
52,
32
9,9
31
70
4,9
66
1,2
59
,63
26
17,
47
82
90,
43
43
86,
97
53,
69
24
40,5
43
246
,45
91
,102
,02
4
<=
13
.81
8,8
98
,502
3,7
59
,754
10
,97
8,6
604
,16
0,08
72,1
52
,67
21
,60
7,0
82
97
0,2
90
2,7
49
,70
58
65
,43
71,
47
8,1
47
75
1,4
53
35
3,5
11
43
5,5
17
4,9
30
519
,65
43
02,1
75
1,3
27,3
80
<=
13
.92
1,9
51
,015
4,3
81
,561
12
,71
8,2
864
,85
1,16
82,4
41
,37
51
,94
0,1
87
1,1
36
,31
73,
13
6,8
00
1,0
59
,13
61,
70
1,
17
79
09,
18
64
12,
45
24
86,
81
55,
48
65
80,0
66
367
,36
41
,492
,48
8
<=
14
.02
5,3
82
,625
5,1
42
,737
14
,64
2,6
475
,59
7,24
12,8
31
,00
72
,31
1,7
31
1,3
38
,65
23,
47
6,0
56
1,2
32
,83
22,
04
0,
69
91
,03
8,4
46
47
1,0
53
55
4,3
42
7,2
24
631
,89
44
58,1
69
1,6
51,
92
9
<=
14
.12
8,8
92
,603
5,7
89
,432
16
,68
4,4
836
,41
8,68
93,0
81
,99
92
,70
7,4
33
1,5
73
,80
53,
84
6,8
83
1,4
63
,67
82,
27
9,
86
71
,26
1,9
60
52
2,0
14
61
6,2
91
9,4
71
702
,35
45
36,0
74
1,8
50,
60
6
<=
14
.23
2,5
81
,887
6,7
83
,904
18
,64
4,6
577
,15
3,32
63,6
53
,37
83
,13
0,5
26
1,8
48
,31
04,
25
7,6
69
1,6
75
,83
02,
53
4,
02
71
,44
5,6
49
57
0,0
29
65
7,5
54
12,0
79
757
,27
85
98,2
41
2,0
09,3
34
<=
14
.33
5,9
98
,748
7,3
85
,225
20
,63
9,5
917
,97
3,93
2 3,9
02
,16
53
,48
3,0
59
2,1
26
,55
24,
53
0,5
41
1,8
85
,15
92,
74
7,
17
51
,70
6,4
86
66
4,2
40
70
0,3
95
13,8
47
807
,36
36
83,4
39
2,1
71,3
86
<=
14
.43
9,5
64
,092
8,1
52
,651
22
,55
8,7
928
,85
2,64
9 4,2
74
,85
63
,87
7,7
95
2,3
95
,01
14,
74
5,6
61
2,0
96
,66
72,
99
8,
28
11
,95
7,6
42
71
6,9
91
74
4,0
67
19,0
34
873
,91
87
56,1
66
2,3
25,8
64
<=
14
.54
3,3
14
,065
9,1
88
,915
24
,50
1,7
399
,62
3,41
2 4,8
06
,00
64
,38
2,9
08
2,6
19
,55
55,
06
1,1
70
2,3
46
,52
23,
21
2,
19
92
,21
5,4
82
78
2,4
23
81
5,4
77
25,6
60
910
,60
08
29,8
34
2,4
40,2
06
<=
14
.64
8,8
70
,572
10
,18
3,3
732
7,7
63
,740
10
,92
3,46
0 5,1
89
,56
04
,99
3,8
13
2,8
64
,18
05,
79
6,9
94
2,7
08
,96
13,
56
1,
53
82
,49
6,0
92
89
5,4
15
95
1,0
00
34,8
68
1,0
28,7
54
930
,06
42
,860
,20
2
<=
14
.75
4,6
54
,565
11
,79
7,9
473
0,7
20
,921
12
,13
5,69
7 6,1
16
,55
75
,68
1,3
89
3,1
42
,18
86,
44
4,7
75
3,0
83
,24
63,
86
9,
36
02
,78
3,0
92
93
1,0
30
1,1
06,
60
949
,42
61
,188
,66
11
,038
,86
43
,092
,63
6
Ele
vati
on
Ran
ge
Tota
lM
etr
o M
anil
aLa
gun
aR
izal
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
2627
2829
3031
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Pag
sanj
anLu
mba
nK
alay
aan
Pae
teP
akil
Pan
gil
Sin
iloan
Fam
yM
abita
cJa
laja
laP
ililia
Tana
yB
aras
Mo
rong
Car
dona
Bin
ango
nan
Ang
ono
Tayt
ay
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
454
1,0
090
4,4
77
16
91,
89
30
028
03
58
33
48,
362
1,6
7731
82
,26
31
3,3
98
4,6
25
15,
698
645
2,7
750
7,7
91
79
41,
89
386
02
,94
95
,32
03
,14
71
5,4
502
,387
2,9
59
2,7
47
16
,94
28,
14
92
9,0
98
1,7
986
,622
02
7,1
98
3,0
58
8,7
45
4,8
351
,25
73
,96
97
,94
76
,30
44
3,4
277
,241
5,4
60
9,0
46
61
,03
12
5,7
19
82,
415
3,6
6113
,728
03
7,3
79
5,2
50
9,8
74
5,2
431
,31
11
4,5
23
22
,97
31
3,9
48
65,
494
9,7
9013
,62
11
2,3
92
93
,24
43
8,5
83
12
4,8
92
3,6
6120
,096
227
65
,53
49
,90
91
6,4
37
21,
320
5,1
66
17
,57
82
8,
28
82
2,5
34
10
5,3
2714
,600
19,7
67
14
,30
41
23
,25
66
8,7
20
17
4,5
92
8,5
6832
,251
500
85
,93
21
5,4
86
23,
32
12
4,0
265
,51
92
7,7
66
36
,96
42
5,2
78
13
7,8
7320
,718
26,0
18
26
,66
12
19
,91
41
03,
01
02
61,
901
9,5
7154
,991
1,4
55
118
,83
41
7,5
17
27,
34
93
9,9
717
,67
33
9,4
15
51
,43
34
0,0
80
22
0,7
4232
,529
41,3
92
30
,47
92
49
,11
41
62,
58
53
54,
485
12,
073
70,3
922
,14
615
6,7
55
31
,19
53
4,8
05
56,
396
11,6
15
40
,97
36
6,0
83
48
,81
52
56,
616
36,7
0253
,95
83
7,9
84
31
1,4
90
22
4,0
63
48
1,2
10
16,
857
112
,027
3,1
07
181
,34
03
4,7
15
43,
58
47
6,5
7013
,50
25
2,2
96
77
,02
65
6,5
28
30
3,9
4548
,626
72,4
04
48
,77
24
01
,22
62
78
,36
05
94,
146
21,
035
134
,210
3,5
89
214
,79
33
5,8
23
56,
95
19
4,4
9417
,26
05
9,5
00
96
,56
26
8,8
26
38
3,3
4959
,111
89,4
88
54
,01
84
69
,82
13
55
,38
36
93,
472
25,
369
174
,885
4,1
68
268
,31
34
5,6
90
81,
73
01
18,
479
19,5
03
68
,21
31
08
,55
17
8,8
03
47
9,6
1585
,196
104
,20
27
8,3
79
61
0,1
094
53,
69
59
46,
346
30,
354
228
,878
4,9
71
317
,49
45
0,4
76
90,
15
41
51,
139
22,8
97
83
,44
31
41
,43
31
05
,37
85
61,
060
95,9
711
39,0
14
92
,25
47
07
,59
05
40,
00
91,
15
7,3
87
35,
824
278
,360
5,1
46
382
,69
76
2,8
60
11
6,0
37
21
8,7
8532
,70
68
8,0
49
17
4,5
64
13
0,6
89
65
6,5
011
10,9
481
66,1
50
103
,32
98
45
,30
36
34,
95
61,
33
7,6
49
46,
832
341
,832
5,1
46
415
,35
06
9,1
18
13
9,5
70
25
7,4
9238
,36
711
7,2
92
19
8,6
17
15
3,7
15
73
5,0
191
34,0
231
90,7
21
128
,46
31
,0
59
,67
77
22,
83
71,
52
8,0
96
56,
334
414
,194
6,9
87
477
,50
37
4,2
29
16
1,6
30
37
4,7
3445
,71
013
0,0
28
22
4,2
75
18
3,5
22
89
8,7
671
63,0
822
15,1
17
142
,18
91
,1
55
,98
28
60,
42
21,
75
3,8
85
61,
770
488
,071
10
,05
052
5,3
66
10
0,7
49
18
6,8
28
45
9,6
7651
,16
813
7,8
03
25
0,1
87
22
2,1
72
97
4,6
321
82,5
552
36,1
18
166
,74
61,2
95
,01
61
,02
9,9
09
2,0
61,
352
72,
999
604
,570
13
,86
456
8,7
00
10
8,8
13
20
1,1
31
50
9,1
0259
,23
414
0,2
45
27
1,2
32
24
8,4
41
1,0
64,
852
203
,820
284
,22
318
4,8
87
1,4
47
,09
31
,12
7,4
35
2,3
21,
342
88,
665
684
,728
21
,02
261
8,4
71
12
0,6
65
25
1,6
62
60
1,2
4767
,31
014
9,2
39
33
4,7
98
29
7,0
74
1,1
82,
590
233
,674
323
,50
220
5,3
65
1,6
18
,72
71
,22
8,0
69
2,5
50,
134
94,
002
777
,992
26
,74
964
7,4
47
13
7,6
80
30
8,3
84
68
5,2
2179
,22
417
2,7
92
35
7,8
68
33
3,6
29
1,2
73,
655
279
,146
351
,05
423
1,4
10
1,7
85
,77
11
,36
3,0
53
2,8
77,
063
10
8,0
698
62,4
463
6,7
21
680
,15
21
46
,68
63
62,
74
07
74,
364
88,
789
182
,64
63
72
,87
03
68
,63
01,
33
9,4
102
90,0
903
98,4
23
255
,0
18
1,9
64
,55
11
,47
0,4
53
3,1
63,
966
12
5,3
559
55,0
004
8,4
53
774
,00
91
62
,41
14
38,
65
38
32,
717
96,
282
202
,79
04
00
,19
14
20
,76
21,
52
2,3
043
43,1
364
31,6
98
300
,3
52
2,2
86
,35
51
,60
0,7
91
3,6
17,
872
14
2,9
701,
050
,072
60
,69
284
9,7
19
18
9,4
09
47
0,3
56
86
7,5
651
09,2
70
250
,98
04
77
,02
05
15
,48
01,
66
8,7
493
70,9
115
04,3
07
32
7,7
99
2,5
47
,09
51
,70
5,9
38
4,0
18,
398
A-45
Appendix Damage to House and Household Goods by Height (PHP)
Eco
nom
ic D
amag
e of
Indu
stor
ial A
sset
(in
c. in
dire
ct)1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
Met
roM
anila
Met
roM
anila
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
na
Tagu
ig C
ityM
untin
lupa
City
San
Ped
roB
inan
San
ta R
osa
Cab
uyao
City
of
Cal
amba
Los
Ban
os
Bay
Cal
auan
Vic
toria
Pila
San
ta C
ruz
<=
12
.50
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
<=
12
.65
37
,09
52
3,3
62
34
0,1
38
17
3,5
94
442
22,9
2012
,351
71,3
6314
,068
40,8
9715
,770
18,
525
32,
225
01
8,38
88,
552
45,
737
<=
12
.71
,09
8,0
96
78
,40
56
82
,70
03
36
,99
12,
408
75,9
9735
,574
128
,176
34,9
2491
,992
33,2
842
1,84
27
2,46
60
43,
278
26,
349
76,
024
<=
12
.81
,83
9,3
32
93
,42
11
,22
6,7
79
51
9,1
32
3,39
390
,027
52,7
102
08,6
3064
,735
161
,813
52,8
884
4,11
210
8,71
781
57
0,99
83
0,15
615
4,63
4
<=
12
.92
,50
9,6
23
16
2,2
10
1,6
55
,65
36
91
,76
04,
388
157
,821
75,3
102
88,8
6495
,681
236
,392
84,1
286
3,21
71
48,
861
953
85,
230
46,
440
201,
983
<=
13
.03
,50
8,2
53
23
7,2
63
2,2
83
,72
39
87
,26
75,
842
231
,421
117
,005
356
,927
124
,687
416
,255
108
,431
68,
66
018
7,94
81,
707
106,
602
74,
522
254,
585
<=
13
.15
,05
4,2
86
33
3,8
01
3,2
04
,86
21
,51
5,6
23
7,18
63
26,6
151
93,5
915
04,4
301
69,6
595
59,6
041
63,6
7010
6,98
725
7,24
12,
303
146,
661
102,
615
348,
847
<=
13
.26
,63
3,3
95
47
4,1
63
4,1
35
,83
92
,02
3,3
93
12,
577
461
,586
297
,700
645
,660
205
,926
745
,379
208
,623
126
,73
031
5,71
22,
345
184,
955
139,
378
432,
957
<=
13
.38
,33
5,6
84
54
8,9
73
5,2
60
,39
32
,52
6,3
18
14,
305
534
,668
379
,137
790
,258
258
,395
947
,939
293
,790
189
,30
136
5,12
93,
213
233,
616
171,
708
552,
415
<=
13
.41
0,2
04
,87
46
86
,75
36
,40
5,2
61
3,1
12
,85
91
7,04
16
69,7
124
94,2
399
06,5
723
13,5
761
,199
,144
389
,464
23
6,03
341
0,72
33,
354
267,
410
228,
405
653,
016
<=
13
.51
2,3
27
,37
98
97
,81
87
,69
0,1
57
3,7
39
,40
42
0,69
58
77,1
225
94,7
161
,058
,528
369
,912
1,5
17,3
254
78,6
64
263,
580
472,
584
4,07
629
4,25
330
5,67
572
6,52
9
<=
13
.61
5,6
61
,76
31
,15
0,9
85
9,7
44
,99
04
,76
5,7
89
23,
427
1,1
27,5
587
52,7
801
,374
,176
468
,895
1,8
64,7
086
34,
676
335,
862
589,
804
4,67
736
8,30
642
5,68
091
3,97
7
<=
13
.71
8,8
57
,20
21
,44
6,3
71
11
,67
3,4
79
5,7
37
,35
33
2,45
31
,413
,917
949
,382
1,6
66,6
085
76,1
962
,206
,223
741
,8
1938
4,06
369
9,79
74,
677
451,
256
553,
423
1,06
5,09
1
<=
13
.82
2,5
40
,92
21
,61
9,3
93
14
,16
5,1
27
6,7
56
,40
13
6,74
91
,582
,645
1,1
28,4
831
,948
,088
694
,781
2,5
96,7
728
86
,041
498,
792
808,
126
6,40
953
3,76
269
4,96
81,
331,
516
<=
13
.92
6,4
81
,21
81
,95
3,6
83
16
,59
5,0
27
7,9
32
,50
84
2,05
41
,911
,629
1,3
35,9
092
,234
,256
848
,870
3,0
54,2
031
,0
81,9
5157
8,59
492
8,29
78,
166
607,
117
841,
971
1,56
4,21
3
<=
14
.03
0,9
54
,73
52
,39
8,9
86
19
,40
5,7
10
9,1
50
,03
94
9,05
42
,349
,932
1,5
72,3
732
,543
,036
1,0
00,0
963
,691
,4151
,247
,187
635,
919
1,06
2,30
11
1,93
067
2,79
81,
011,
622
1,77
8,07
5
<=
14
.13
5,3
42
,35
52
,78
6,7
46
22
,04
9,0
21
10
,50
6,5
87
52,
645
2,7
34,1
011
,852
,291
2,8
50,1
031
,158
,724
4,1
48,2
671,4
70,8
9070
5,12
91,
172,
766
14,
728
738,
410
1,18
8,69
12,
000,
822
<=
14
.23
9,4
06
,32
83
,14
8,4
16
24
,45
8,5
11
11
,79
9,4
01
62,
355
3,0
86,0
602
,151
,842
3,1
85,5
321
,288
,099
4,5
80,5
711,6
29,6
1278
5,85
51,
249,
833
18,
481
803,
256
1,33
7,70
22,
205,
991
<=
14
.34
3,8
39
,68
73
,48
1,4
89
27
,18
4,9
58
13
,17
3,2
39
67,
601
3,4
13,8
882
,430
,274
3,4
16,0
911
,423
,702
5,0
32,9
551,8
84,3
2691
8,39
51,
348,
295
21,
407
866,
829
1,53
9,36
92,
425,
526
<=
14
.44
8,6
85
,00
13
,86
1,4
06
30
,01
9,2
76
14
,80
4,3
20
74,
580
3,7
86,8
262
,741
,270
3,5
97,8
731
,591
,643
5,5
84,9
872,1
23,9
721
,002
,31
21,
424,
358
31,
620
943,
137
1,70
4,75
72,
684,
416
<=
14
.55
3,3
82
,63
64
,41
2,1
80
32
,83
7,2
74
16
,13
3,1
82
84,
197
4,3
27,9
833
,032
,250
3,9
16,4
191
,753
,768
6,0
50,0
202,3
42,8
211
,083
,17
11,
540,
075
47,
898
980,
144
1,87
6,16
92,
870,
428
<=
14
.65
8,9
42
,84
14
,92
1,5
18
36
,32
3,3
38
17
,69
7,9
85
89,
491
4,8
32,0
273
,321
,963
4,3
13,8
481
,977
,540
6,5
95,0
882,6
45,1
391
,182
,12
51,
690,
624
61,
203
1,05
7,06
82,
120,
5623,
210,
274
<=
14
.76
4,1
42
,49
55
,42
7,9
69
39
,45
4,0
25
19
,26
0,5
01
99,
310
5,3
28,6
593
,622
,833
4,7
09,0
582
,216
,450
7,0
29,2
002,8
64,4
571
,276
,00
71,
851,
314
80,
292
1,17
2,43
22,
351,
5663,
465,
430
Ele
vati
on
Ran
ge
Tota
lM
etr
o M
anil
aLa
gun
aR
izal
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
2627
2829
3031
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naLa
guna
Lagu
naR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Riz
alR
izal
Pag
sanj
anLu
mba
nK
alay
aan
Pae
teP
akil
Pan
gil
Sin
iloan
Fam
yM
abita
cJa
laja
laP
ililia
Tana
yB
aras
Mo
rong
Car
dona
Bin
ango
nan
Ang
ono
Tayt
ay
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
2,5
33
1,9
560
50,2
88
2,7
663
,36
20
01
,35
81,
553
3,1
93
20
,43
22
,828
3,8
63
13,
020
28,1
07
22
,24
77
8,3
52
3,2
38
5,7
210
88,0
92
6,2
473
,36
25
,95
30
6,1
77
12,
375
26,2
41
36
,10
53,
891
23,0
86
14,
409
37,6
66
38
,00
51
45,
213
3,4
01
8,3
290
179
,43
72
6,0
588
,88
54
1,0
98
1,58
27
,78
11
5,4
6154
,09
35
3,3
31
4,9
5536
,73
11
8,7
2957
,50
86
5,9
71
21
2,3
52
11,4
65
18
,096
02
02,1
58
27,
885
10,7
82
43
,90
01,
655
12,6
55
23
,788
67,4
26
61
,54
36,
989
56,1
60
28,
488
101
,41
08
2,8
09
26
3,1
47
11,4
73
25
,583
1,10
12
91,4
28
29,
175
14,5
16
75
,62
22,
571
14,9
25
28,
067
97,2
82
117
,83
31
2,5
0678
,69
82
9,5
661
17,6
87
144
,18
03
61,
448
19,5
39
39
,917
2,30
24
10,0
18
53,
028
18,0
53
86
,93
12,
845
16,6
21
38,
167
105
,73
515
3,1
58
17,
179
103
,88
86
3,4
401
80,6
33
224
,47
26
28,
951
23,1
22
54
,318
4,21
15
09,3
96
59,
991
20,5
71
133
,490
3,50
021
,8
73
53,
704
143
,75
619
8,2
10
23,
026
152
,00
57
4,3
122
25,8
75
299
,97
88
52,
527
28,9
56
73
,212
4,28
66
43,7
76
82,
510
29,4
06
183
,564
6,05
523
,7
26
72,
251
195
,04
024
5,8
60
25,
801
192
,46
68
2,7
812
94,3
68
385
,50
31
,03
2,2
49
40,8
68
110
,622
4,40
07
23,4
33
90,
555
42,2
16
254
,605
6,89
129
,73
48
2,3
142
25,0
17
287
,50
33
8,0
692
33,3
58
99,
649
393
,12
44
61
,87
71
,29
1,9
48
45,2
63
140
,233
5,52
18
63,6
47
90,
636
55,1
52
363
,221
8,45
232
,19
19
0,7
102
70,0
91
362
,82
94
4,6
682
72,0
38
109
,903
459
,20
658
5,0
26
1,5
44,
934
56,5
55
196
,394
6,74
41,
072
,27
211
8,0
9769
,26
344
5,9
089,
168
37,0
46
106,
669
294
,81
044
9,9
42
56,
058
316
,85
616
2,4
926
05,1
10
745
,75
12
,02
8,1
03
69,2
35
244
,654
8,61
81,
257
,43
512
8,8
0774
,58
953
0,8
571
1,2
31
49,5
19
138,
995
377
,73
254
7,3
02
68,
223
400
,87
818
3,0
547
06
,23
686
7,7
42
2,4
47,
192
82,6
87
311
,114
9,47
61,
523
,30
017
7,9
2698
,48
076
3,6
201
6,7
17
54,0
67
171,
195
476
,83
165
5,6
52
79,
857
468
,46
020
7,7
118
37
,70
81,
027
,31
52
,83
1,6
71
107
,30
839
6,6
979,
476
1,6
24,9
58
194,
262
121
,51
897
0,2
951
9,4
28
67,5
39
196,
959
542
,09
072
7,4
25
99,
485
542
,85
824
5,7
141,0
30,5
21
1,24
1,9
62
3,3
05,
493
126
,63
550
1,5
361
2,83
81,
855
,20
019
7,3
801
48,1
54
1,24
2,0
47
22,
747
72,4
19
217,
543
635
,43
789
1,1
92
11
5,36
86
33,6
02
266
,666
1,1
39,3
62
1,45
5,6
80
3,7
95,
190
141
,36
161
1,6
742
0,84
02,
081
,62
124
6,4
671
73,8
42
1,37
0,3
43
24,
113
77,9
39
253,
191
681
,53
598
8,7
32
13
1,60
97
00,6
47
328
,826
1,3
13,7
60
1,65
5,8
72
4,4
52,
415
157
,16
971
2,8
502
8,65
72,
244
,77
425
9,5
161
89,9
09
1,51
7,6
27
29,
101
82,1
35
276,
899
744
,52
11,
113
,47
91
50,
540
793
,71
03
71
,131
1,4
79,4
56
1,82
4,6
72
5,0
44,
992
184
,68
185
1,8
023
4,40
42,
377
,84
527
4,1
902
43,2
55
1,78
7,5
88
34,
662
89,3
64
322,
634
830
,46
31,
262
,16
41
68,
702
906
,07
04
11
,187
1,6
59,2
86
2,02
5,6
88
5,5
87,
045
200
,66
398
7,2
043
8,78
52,
514
,02
531
1,9
722
98,6
28
2,09
3,4
82
40,
392
103
,77
834
0,2
339
08,0
18
1,37
1,8
79
20
1,96
89
81,4
634
37
,463
1,8
78,2
17
2,28
7,8
13
6,3
97,
265
247
,02
21,
122
,05
74
4,86
52,
654
,87
832
6,4
633
50,2
64
2,43
9,
44
84
3,75
01
15,3
66
363,
350
1,0
01,7
40
1,46
9,2
74
20
8,02
11,
082
,95
147
2,5
302
,065
,82
52,
480
,26
46
,98
9,2
26
281
,43
01,
274
,04
55
7,88
42,
910
,18
333
8,2
043
99,4
76
2,70
2,
90
84
6,26
01
37,5
17
391,
631
1,0
80,7
20
1,62
1,5
93
23
2,61
41,
163
,63
853
1,5
992
,327
,47
02,
670
,56
67
,67
8,1
55
317
,27
41,
409
,95
06
6,22
83,
109
,42
537
5,0
034
35,6
82
2,88
6,
65
35
3,71
91
61,0
53
440,
676
1,1
94,0
79
1,77
7,7
18
25
4,66
11,
277
,80
556
4,9
772
,560
,68
42,
805
,83
38
,38
4,0
67
A-46
Appendix 2-4 Number of Establishments by Sector
CF
GH
IJ
KL
PQ
RS
Tota
l
C -
Man
ufac
turin
gF
-C
ons
truct
ion
G -
Who
lesa
lean
d R
etai
lTr
ade;
Rep
air
of
Mo
tor
Veh
icle
s an
dM
oto
rcyc
les
H -
Tra
nspo
rtan
d S
tora
ge
I -
Acc
om
mo
dati
on
and
Foo
dS
ervi
ceA
ctiv
ities
J -
Info
rmat
ion
and
Co
mm
unic
ati
on
K -
Fin
anci
alan
d In
sura
nce
Act
iviti
es
L -
Rea
lE
stat
eA
ctiv
ities
P -
Edu
catio
n
Q -
Hum
anH
ealth
and
So
cial
Wo
rkA
ctiv
ities
R -
Arts
,E
nter
tain
men
t,
and
Rec
reat
ion
S -
Oth
erS
ervi
ceA
ctiv
ities
Tot
al
9,3
24
607
32,
645
793
10,4
31
4,1
384
,13
01,
888
2,0
092
,93
991
66,
217
76,0
37
Sh
are
12%
1%43
%1
%1
4%5
%5
%2%
3%
4%
1%8
%1
00%
NC
RM
akat
i City
1,0
18
186
4,9
5225
52,
214
798
1,4
10
882
324
666
121
1,1
5613
,98
2N
CR
Mun
tinlu
pa
City
444
622,
617
62
632
216
286
82
146
222
55
36
25
,18
6N
CR
Pas
ig C
ity1
,05
114
64,
467
126
1,18
95
1164
937
42
7042
413
97
5210
,09
8N
CR
Pat
ero
s11
45
211
775
414
72
194
41
960
644
NC
RT
agu
ig C
ity74
725
3,0
996
198
43
3532
210
01
8424
87
36
706
,84
8R
iza
lA
ngo
no17
94
700
420
278
46
22
337
62
31
361
,50
3R
iza
lB
ara
s5
11
168
050
236
36
74
2734
6R
iza
lC
ain
ta59
526
2,0
562
266
02
2813
53
11
2019
38
75
744
,72
7R
iza
lJa
laja
la2
60
880
3116
31
82
314
192
Riz
al
Mor
ong
98
12
381
7739
30
617
30
13
5360
3R
iza
lP
ililia
79
22
241
8029
51
513
58
3349
4R
iza
lT
ana
y18
43
849
622
068
70
78
326
02
31
191
,71
2R
iza
lT
ayta
y1
,13
639
2,0
092
156
02
6310
64
795
157
60
384
4,8
77
Riz
al
Car
don
a6
50
164
039
185
87
67
2634
5R
iza
lB
ina
ngo
nan
239
91,
232
731
71
297
32
606
22
01
682
,31
8La
gun
aB
ay10
05
342
010
649
10
320
13
638
692
Lagu
na
Bin
an
456
89
385
120
21
148
92
868
64
24
164
2,2
06
Lagu
na
Cab
uya
o39
415
1,5
024
130
82
027
65
91
038
12
72
393
,04
7La
gun
aC
ala
uan
39
01
541
3213
15
08
10
216
290
Lagu
na
City
of
Ca
lam
ba73
624
1,8
545
11,
095
233
215
51
139
146
74
364
4,9
82
Lagu
na
Fam
y5
032
07
01
01
00
34
9La
gun
aK
ala
yaa
n2
50
650
2310
10
21
55
137
Lagu
na
Los
Ba
nos
100
24
857
241
616
52
336
37
10
801
,14
7La
gun
aL
umba
n14
42
117
029
428
15
22
1736
9La
gun
aM
abita
c2
00
193
131
31
10
21
64
Lagu
na
Pae
te8
00
164
043
251
40
67
522
366
Lagu
na
Pag
sanj
an5
80
146
458
171
61
91
03
2234
4La
gun
aP
akil
28
048
029
124
03
83
914
4La
gun
aP
angi
l2
20
440
1519
20
30
04
109
Lagu
na
Pila
70
21
810
4527
83
102
13
2839
8La
gun
aS
an P
edro
455
181,
180
24
297
281
138
32
117
136
40
278
2,
996
Lagu
na
San
ta C
ruz
128
27
196
150
609
45
335
01
284
1,3
43
Lagu
na
San
ta R
osa
340
191,
061
31
347
130
143
28
100
123
37
260
2,6
19
Lagu
na
Sin
iloan
61
13
771
4124
28
05
27
531
601
Lagu
na
Vic
toria
37
01
430
2026
70
61
118
259
Pro
cinc
eLG
U
A-47
Appendix 2-5 Crop Area of Each Crop, Harvest Volume, Price
Note: Price of Sugarcane is converted from the price of sugar price Source : MAJOR CROPS STATISTICS OF THE PHILIPPINES, 2010-2014, PSA
FarmgatePrice (2017)
Production(ton)
Area (ha)Productio
n (ton)Area (ha)
Production (ton)
Area (ha) (PHP/kg)
Palay 18,967,826 4,739,672 130,904 30,619 27,243 8,073 10.46- Irrigated Palay 14,405,716 3,253,080 130,383 30,370 22,107 6,428- Raifed Palay 4,562,110 1,486,592 521 249 5,136 1,645Corn 7,770,603 2,611,432 2,249 1,007 1,660 551 9.32- White Corn 2,262,234 1,290,213 1,455 797 759 363- Yellow Corn 5,508,369 1,321,219 794 210 901 188
Major Cereal 'Total 7,351,104 31,626 8,624
Coconut 14,696,298 3,502,011 96,110 62,200 720 270 7.84Coffee 75,454 117,451 81 620 82 60 30.01Sugarcane 25,029,880 432,026 11,250 146 0 0 3.28Banana 8,884,857 442,751 15,867 6,642 3,347 2,042 9.99Calamansi 160,740 20,065 360 420 719 72 19.94Mango 885,038 188,092 557 187 1,241 813 25.16Pinapple 2,507,098 61,643 12,670 1,020 513 42 12.03Sweet Potato 519,855 88,968 1,125 157 751 96 14.99Cassava 2,540,254 216,775 1,970 150 938 110 6.29Eggplant 225,579 21,159 1,759 159 592 70 24.23Peanut 29,196 25,048 19 9 38 56 31.33Tomato 214,573 16,742 6,573 520 159 23 16.48
Other Crops Total 5,186,574 72,284 3,661Total 12,537,678 103,910 12,285
RizalCountryCrop
Laguna
A-48
添付資料 2-6 Economic Price Calculation of Rice and Corn
1.Thai 5% broken rice, price forecast in nominal US$ in 2030, converted to 2017 constant price (Source: Commodity Market Outlook, April 2017, World Bank)
- Projection in 2030 440 USD/ton - MUV index 2017-2030 1.280 USD/ton - Projection in 2030 by constant price in 2017 344 USD/ton
4.1US$=51,45PHP (Oct./2017) 11.Milling recovery is assumed at 65% for paddy
Economic Price Calculation of Corn
1.USA maize, forecast in nominal US$ in 2030, converted to 2017 constant price (Source: Commodity Market Outlook, April 2017, World Bank) - Projection in 2030 210 USD/ton - MUV index 2017-2030 1.280 USD/ton - Projection in 2030 by constant price in 2017 164 USD/ton 4.1US$=51,45PHP (Oct./2017)
Operation US$/ton PHP/Kg1. Price Forecast of rice, Bangkok, Thailand, f.o.b. 344.02. Quality Adjustment 95 (10% broken) 326.83. Insurance, freight, etc. 30.04. Forecast 2017 c.i.f. price of rice, Manila 356.8
18.365. Port handling, storage and losses 5% + 0.926. Transportation (port to wholesaler) + 1.007. Ex-wholesaler price 20.288. Merketing Margin 10% - 2.039. Local transportation (village to wholesaler) - 1.0010. Value of Milled Rice 17.2511. Conversion of Paddy 65% 11.2112. Milling Cost - 0.5013. Revenue of Rice Bran + 0.7514. Transportation and Stabilization of Rice Bran - 0.5015. Local transportation (farm to village) - 0.5016. Economic farm gate price 10.46
Import Parity
Operation US$/ton IDR/Kg1. Price Forecast of maize, Gulf Ports, USA, f.o.b. 164.02. Insurance, freight, etc. 40.03. Forecast 2017 c.i.f. price of maize, Jakarta 204.0
10.504. Port handling, storage and losses 5% + 0.525. Transportation (port to wholesaler) + 1.006. Ex-wholesaler price 12.027. Merketing Margin 10% - 1.208. Local transportation (village to wholesaler) - 1.009. Local transportation (farm to village) - 0.5010. Economic farm gate price 9.32
Import Parity
A-49
Appendix 3
Materials Related to Compensation Costs
A-50
Appendix 3-1 Compensation Cost for Land Acquisition for Development of Paranaque Spillway
a1. L
eng
tha2
. Wid
tha3
. Are
ain
ca
se o
f Z
Vin
ca
se o
f M
Vin
ca
se o
f Z
Vin
ca
se o
f M
V
(m)
(m)
(m2
)(P
hP./m
2)
Ye
ar(P
hP./m
2)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
No
.(P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
Ope
n C
hann
elT
agui
gLo
we
r B
icut
an1
,20
08
39
9,3
46
9,4
64
20
19
11
,35
79
40
1,1
28
Sha
ft (
De
part
ing)
Tagu
igLo
we
r B
icut
an8
05
04
,00
09
,46
42
01
91
1,3
57
38
45
Sha
ft (
Arr
ival
) Par
anaq
ueS
an D
ioni
sio
1,0
00
15
,77
22
01
81
8,9
26
16
19
09
03
,41
10
16
19
Tota
l-
--
-1
04
,34
6-
--
99
41
,19
32
80
-2
53
1,2
47
1,4
46
Ope
n C
hann
elM
untin
lupa
Suc
at6
00
83
49
,67
32
4,9
05
20
19
29
,8
86
1,2
37
1,4
85
Sha
ft (
De
part
ing)
Mun
tinlu
paS
ucat
80
50
4,0
00
24
,90
52
01
92
9,8
86
10
01
20
Sha
ft (
Arr
ival
) Las
Pin
asP
ula
ng L
upa
Uno
1,0
00
13
,16
82
01
71
5,8
02
13
16
09
03
,41
10
13
16
Tota
l-
--
-5
4,6
73
--
-1
,35
01
,62
02
90
-2
62
1,6
12
1,8
82
No
te)
a1. W
idth
of
land
acq
uisi
tion
is t
he w
idth
of
chan
ne
l plu
s ad
ditio
nal 1
2m
ne
cess
ary
for
acqu
isiti
on
of
mar
gina
l are
as o
f re
side
ntia
l lo
t.b.
Zo
nal V
alue
(Z
V)
pro
vide
d by
BIR
(B
ure
au o
f In
ternal
Re
venu
e)
, spe
cific
ally
ave
rage
val
ue o
f Z
V in
the
bar
anga
y in
que
stio
n.c.
Mar
ket
Val
ue (
MV
) is
cal
cula
ted
as 1
.2 ti
me
s as
la
rge
as
ZV
fo
r co
nsis
tenc
y w
ith t
he c
ase
of
Mas
ter
Pla
n o
f th
is P
roje
ct.
d. A
vera
ge c
ost
fo
r la
nd a
cqui
sitio
n =
a *
b, o
r a
* c
f. D
ata
of a
vera
ge c
ost
fo
r co
nstr
uctio
n o
f re
side
ntia
l bui
ldin
g (h
ous
e)
liste
d in
a s
tatis
tical
bo
ok
cons
ide
ring
infla
tion.
h. T
ota
l co
st fo
r co
mpe
nsat
ion
= d
+ g
90
3,4
11
26
21
,59
91
,86
62
90
Bar
anga
y
1,4
27
1. L
ow
er
Bic
utan
-P
aran
aque
R.
28
09
03
,41
12
53
1,2
31
Tabl
e C
om
pens
atio
n C
ost
for
Land
Acq
uisi
tio
n fo
r De
velo
pme
nt o
f Par
anaq
ue S
pill
way
Cas
e (
Ro
ute
)F
acili
tyLo
catio
na.
Are
ab.
Zo
nal V
alue
c. M
arke
tV
alue
d. C
ost
for
land
acq
uisi
tion
e. N
umbe
r o
fbu
ildin
gs
f. U
nit
cost
of
resi
dent
ial
build
ing
3. S
ucat
-Z
apo
te R
.
g. R
epl
ace
me
ntco
st f
orre
side
ntia
lbu
ildin
gs
h. T
ota
l cos
t fo
r co
mpe
nsa
tion
City
A-51
Appendix 3-2 Compensation Cost for Tunnel Section under Private Land of Paranaque Spillway Route 2-A
a1. L
eng
tha2
. Wid
tha3
. Are
ain
ca
se o
f Z
Vin
ca
se o
f M
Vin
ca
se o
f Z
Vin
ca
se o
f M
V
(m)
(m)
(m2
)(P
hP./m
2)
Ye
ar(P
hP./m
2)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on PhP
.)
Tunn
el s
ect
ion/
Lagu
na L
ake
side
(S
ucat
)M
untin
lupa
Suc
at2
00
15
.53
,10
02
4,9
05
20
19
29
,88
67
79
31
51
9
Tunn
el s
ect
ion/
Man
ila B
aysi
de (
San
Dio
nisi
o R
ive
r)
Par
anaq
ueS
an D
ioni
sio
32
01
5.5
4,9
60
33
,58
02
01
84
0,2
96
16
72
00
33
40
Tota
l5
20
-8
,06
0-
--
24
42
93
49
59
No
te)
a1. L
eng
th o
f tu
nne
l und
er
priv
ate
land
cal
cula
ted
on
Go
ogl
e E
arth
.a2
. Wid
th o
f pe
rpe
tual
eas
em
ent
is th
e w
idth
of
tun
nel (
13
.5m
) +
2.0
m o
f bu
ffe
r ar
ea.
b. Z
ona
l Val
ue (
ZV
) pr
ovi
ded
by B
IR (
Bur
eau
of
Internal
Re
venu
e)
, spe
cific
ally
ave
rage
val
ue o
f Z
V in
the
bar
anga
y in
que
stio
n.c.
Mar
ket V
alue
(M
V)
is c
alcu
late
d as
1.2
tim
es
as
larg
e a
s Z
V f
or
cons
iste
ncy
with
the
cas
e o
f M
aste
r P
lan
of
this
Pro
ject
.d.
Lav
ue o
f la
nd lo
t = a
* b
, or
a *
ce
. Co
mpe
nsat
ion
cost
fo
r pe
rpe
tual
eas
em
ent
fo
r tu
nne
l co
nstr
uctio
n un
der
priv
ate
land
. Co
mpe
nsat
ion
fo
r st
ruct
ure
s, im
pro
vem
ent
, co
rps
or
tre
es
are
no
t co
nsid
ere
d.
-
Tabl
e C
om
pens
atio
n C
ost
for
Tunn
el S
ect
ion
(< 5
0m
be
low
gro
und
leve
l) u
nde
r P
riva
te L
and
of P
aran
aque
Spi
llw
ay (
Cas
e 2
-A)
Site
Loca
tion
a. A
rea
b. Z
ona
l Val
uec.
Mar
ket
Val
ued.
Val
ue o
f la
nde
. Co
st f
or
com
pens
atio
n
City
Bar
anga
y
A-52
Appendix 3-3 Compensation Cost for Tunnel Section under Private Land of Paranaque Spillway Route
ルート
2-B
Appendix 3-4 Compensation Cost for All Case
a1. L
eng
tha2
. Wid
tha3
. Are
ain
ca
se o
f Z
Vin
ca
se o
f M
Vin
ca
se o
f Z
Vin
ca
se o
f M
V
(m)
(m)
(m2
)(P
hP./m
2)
Ye
ar(P
hP./m
2)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on PhP
.)
Tunn
el s
ect
ion/
Lagu
na L
ake
side
(S
ucat
)M
untin
lupa
Suc
at2
00
15
.53
,10
02
4,9
05
20
19
29
,88
67
79
31
51
9
Par
anaq
ueS
an D
ioni
sio
67
01
5.5
10
,38
53
3,5
80
20
18
40
,29
63
49
41
87
08
4
Ma
nuyo
Dos
1,0
30
15
.51
5,9
65
27
,17
62
01
73
2,6
11
43
45
21
87
10
4P
ula
ng L
upa
Uno
1,6
00
15
.52
4,8
00
20
,47
92
01
72
4,5
75
50
86
09
10
21
22
3,3
00
-5
1,1
50
--
-1
,29
01
,54
92
58
31
0N
ote
)a1
. Le
ngth
of
tunn
el u
nde
r pr
ivat
e la
nd c
alcu
late
d o
n G
oo
gle
Ear
th.
a2. W
idth
of
perp
etu
al e
ase
me
nt is
the
wid
th o
f tu
nne
l (1
3.5
m)
+ 2
.0m
of
buff
er
are
a.b.
Zo
nal V
alue
(Z
V)
pro
vide
d by
BIR
(B
ure
au o
f In
ternal
Re
venu
e)
, spe
cific
ally
ave
rage
val
ue o
f Z
V in
the
bar
anga
y in
que
stio
n.c.
Mar
ket V
alue
(M
V)
is c
alcu
late
d as
1.2
tim
es
as
larg
e a
s Z
V f
or
cons
iste
ncy
with
the
cas
e o
f M
aste
r P
lan
of
this
Pro
ject
.d.
Lav
ue o
f la
nd lo
t = a
* b
, or
a *
ce
. Co
mpe
nsat
ion
cost
fo
r pe
rpe
tual
eas
em
ent
fo
r tu
nne
l co
nstr
uctio
n un
der
priv
ate
land
. Co
mpe
nsat
ion
fo
r st
ruct
ure
s, im
pro
vem
ent
, co
rps
or
tre
es
are
no
t co
nsid
ere
d.
d. V
alue
of
land
e. C
ost
fo
r co
mpe
nsat
ion
Las
Pin
as
Site
Tabl
e
Co
mpe
nsat
ion
Co
st fo
r Tu
nne
l Se
ctio
n (<
50
m be
low
gro
und
leve
l) u
nde
r P
riva
te L
and
of P
aran
aque
Spi
llw
ay (
Cas
e 2
-B )
Loca
tion
City
Bar
anga
yb.
Zo
nal V
alue
c. M
arke
tV
alue
a. A
rea
Tunn
el s
ect
ion/
Man
ila B
aysi
de (
Zao
pote
Riv
er)
Tota
l
in c
ase
of
ZV
in c
ase
of
MV
in c
ase
of
ZV
in c
ase
of
MV
in c
ase
of
ZV
in c
ase
of
MV
in c
ase
of
ZV
in c
ase
of
MV
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on P
hP.)
(milli
on PhP
.)(m
illion
PhP
.)(m
illion
PhP
.)(m
illion
PhP
.)(m
illio
n P
hP.)
1,2
31
1,4
27
1,5
99
1,8
66
1,5
99
1,8
66
15
98
.71
77
51
86
6.0
63
46
16
19
13
16
13
16
13
.16
81
5.8
01
6
00
15
19
15
19
00
00
33
40
25
83
10
00
1,2
47
1,4
46
1,6
61
1,9
40
1,8
85
2,2
10
16
11
.88
57
51
88
1.8
65
06
Tota
l
Tabl
e C
om
pens
atio
n co
st fo
r C
ase
1, C
ase
2-A
,Cas
e2
-B
, Cas
e3
Cas
e 2
-B
Ope
n ch
ann
el/C
haft
(De
part
ing)
Cha
ft (A
riva
l)
Tun
nel s
ect
ion/
La
guna
La
ke s
ide
Tun
nel s
ect
ion/
Ma
nila
Ba
y si
de
Fac
ility
/ Site
Cas
e 1
(2
02
0 V
ers
ion)
Cas
e 3
(2
02
0 V
ers
ion)
Cas
e 2
-A
A-53
Appendix 3-5 Compensation Cost for River Channel Improvement
b. I
mpr
ove
me
ntLe
ngth
Pro
vinc
eC
ity /
Mun
icip
ality
upto
15.
0mc1
. a
vera
geim
prov
em
ent
wid
th
c2.
exi
stin
griv
er
wid
thc3
. c1
- c
2g1
. N
o. o
fH
ouse
hold
s(N
o.)
g2.
Are
a o
fLG
Us
(ha
)
g3.
Ho
us
eh
old
De
ns
ity(N
o./
ha
)
l1.
Ave
rage
Fa
mily
Siz
els
. P
AP
s(N
o.)
Riz
alA
ngo
noA
ngo
no R
ive
rI
1,1
70
36
13
23
2.6
98
71
23
25
,32
52
,62
29
.72
65
33
,99
71
43
74
.51
17
Riz
alTa
ytay
I0
00
NC
RTa
guig
Mag
dao
ng R
ive
rI
39
02
31
01
30
.51
10
,88
65
51
98
,25
64
,52
14
3.9
22
90
3,4
11
20
75
4.1
91
NC
RM
untin
lupa
Ala
bang
Riv
er
I1
,63
03
21
71
52
.45
36
,80
49
001
22
,28
63
,97
53
0.8
75
90
3,4
11
68
96
84
.13
08
Bay
anan
Cre
ek
I6
90
30
10
20
1.3
83
6,8
04
50
81
22
,28
63
,97
53
0.
84
29
03
,41
13
85
46
4.1
17
4P
obl
acio
n R
ive
rI
40
03
01
02
00
.80
36
,80
42
94
12
2,2
86
3,9
75
30
.82
59
03
,41
12
23
17
4.1
10
1M
agda
ong
Riv
er
I6
30
27
12
15
0.9
53
6,8
04
34
81
22
,28
63
,97
53
0.8
29
90
3,4
11
26
37
44
.11
19
SB
-23
-5I
85
03
02
01
00
.85
36
,80
43
13
12
2,2
86
3,9
75
30
.82
69
03
,41
12
43
36
4.1
10
7S
B-2
3-6
I5
20
25
15
10
0.5
23
6,8
04
19
11
22
,28
63
,97
53
0.8
16
90
3,4
11
14
20
64
.16
66
,28
01
0.1
42
,63
32
62
22
72
,86
01
,08
3La
guna
San
Pe
dro
San
Isid
ro R
ive
rII
1,3
40
41
16
25
3.3
53
,48
21
17
73
,03
02
,40
53
0.4
10
26
15
,36
86
31
79
4.5
45
8Tu
nasa
n R
ive
rII
79
03
21
02
21
.74
3,4
82
61
73
,03
02
,40
53
0.4
53
61
5,3
68
32
93
4.5
23
7La
guna
Bin
anS
B-2
0-4
II7
70
39
15
24
1.8
52
,43
44
58
6,7
52
4,3
50
19
.93
76
15
,36
82
36
83
.81
40
Bin
an R
ive
rII
2,8
90
52
30
22
6.3
62
,43
41
55
86
,75
24
,35
01
9.9
12
76
15
,36
87
82
33
3.8
48
2La
guna
San
ta R
osa
Sta
. Ro
sa R
ive
rII
81
05
01
83
22
.59
4,0
68
10
51
01
,38
55
,48
41
8.5
48
61
5,3
68
29
13
53
.51
68
SB
-20
-2II
1,2
40
41
26
15
1.8
64
,06
87
61
01
,38
55
,48
41
8.5
34
61
5,3
68
21
97
3.5
12
0S
B-2
0-3
II1
,01
05
13
02
12
.12
4,0
68
86
10
1,3
85
5,4
84
18
.53
96
15
,36
82
41
10
3.5
13
7La
guna
Cab
uyao
II0
00
Lagu
naC
alam
baS
an J
uan
Riv
er
II1
,50
08
26
02
23
.30
2,4
66
8112
3,0
71
14
,95
08
.22
76
15
,36
81
79
83
.71
01
San
Cri
sto
bal R
ive
rII
1,4
50
71
50
21
3.0
52
,46
67
51
23
,07
11
4,9
50
8.2
25
61
5,3
68
15
91
3.7
93
SB
-17
-6II
71
02
71
31
40
.99
2,4
66
25
12
3,0
71
14
,95
08
.28
61
5,3
68
53
03
.73
0S
B-1
7-7
II7
50
37
15
22
1.6
52
,46
64
11
23
,07
11
4,9
50
8.2
14
61
5,
36
88
49
3.7
50
SB
-17
-8II
1,4
10
47
15
32
4.5
12
,46
61
11
12
3,0
71
14
,95
08
.23
76
15
,36
82
31
34
3.7
13
71
4,6
70
33
.37
97
75
51
33
91
,31
62
,15
4La
guna
Los
Ban
os
Los
Ban
os
Riv
er
III2
,10
05
12
03
16
.51
1,9
21
12
52
9,0
20
5,4
22
5.4
35
61
5,3
68
21
14
63
.91
36
SB
-17
-3III
45
02
41
01
40
.63
1,9
21
12
29
,02
05
,42
25
.43
61
5,3
68
21
43
.91
3S
B-1
7-4
III4
30
33
10
23
0.9
91
,92
11
92
9,0
20
5,4
22
5.4
56
15
,36
83
22
3.9
21
SB
-17
-5III
1,5
50
33
20
13
2.0
21
,92
13
92
9,0
20
5,4
22
5.4
11
61
5,3
68
74
53
.94
2La
guna
Bay
Co
lo R
ive
rIII
1,0
70
32
25
70
.75
1,4
19
11
15
,14
94
,2
66
3.6
36
15
,36
82
12
4.1
11
Lagu
naC
alau
anC
alau
anIII
1,9
70
61
23
38
7.4
96
39
48
17
,66
96
,5
40
2.7
20
61
5,3
68
12
60
4.6
93
SB
-16
-2III
5,2
70
65
10
55
28
.99
63
91
85
17
,66
96
,54
02
.77
86
15
,36
84
82
33
4.6
36
0La
guna
Vic
tori
aP
ilaIII
2,4
10
51
14
37
8.9
21
,06
79
51
0,8
22
2,
23
54
.84
36
15
,36
82
71
22
3.6
15
5La
guna
Pila
SB
-15
-2III
4,7
90
50
20
30
14
.37
63
89
21
1,4
47
3,1
20
3.7
53
61
5,3
68
32
12
44
.42
32
Lagu
naS
anta
Cru
zS
ta. C
ruz
Riv
er
III2
,65
06
96
09
2.3
91
,96
44
72
7,9
82
3,8
59
7.3
17
61
5,3
68
11
57
4.2
73
22
,69
07
3.0
46
72
26
91
65
83
71
,13
64
3,6
40
11
6.5
44
,28
21
,08
17
31
5,0
13
4,3
73
No
te)
a. D
eve
lopm
ent
Pha
se p
ropo
sed
by J
ICA
Sur
vey
Team
.b.
Lo
ngitu
dina
l le
ngth
of
rive
r im
pro
vem
ent
se
ctio
n m
eas
ure
d o
n A
uto
CA
Dc.
Wid
th o
f riv
er
impr
ove
me
nt s
ect
ion
give
n by
JIC
A S
urve
y Te
am.
d. C
alcu
latio
n by
d=
b x
c3e
. Ave
rage
Zo
nal V
alue
cal
cula
ted
by a
ffe
cte
d ba
ran
gay.
f.
Cal
cula
tion
by f=
d x
eg.
Ho
use
hold
de
nsity
is e
stim
ate
d fr
om
num
ber
of
hous
eho
lds
liste
d in
sta
tistic
al b
oo
k in
eac
h LG
U.
h. A
ppro
xim
atio
n by
h=
d x
g3.
i. U
se t
he d
ata
of
ave
rage
co
st fo
r co
nstr
uctio
n o
f r
esi
dent
ial b
uild
ing
(ho
use
) lis
ted
in a
sta
tistic
al b
oo
k co
nsid
eri
ng in
flatio
n.j.
Cal
cula
tion
by j=
h x
ik.
Cal
cula
tion
by k
=f+
jl.
Cal
cula
tion
of P
roje
ct A
ffe
cte
d P
ers
ons
(P
AP
s),
l1 is
ave
rage
fam
ily s
ize
bas
ed
on
a st
atis
tical
bo
ok.
l2=
h x
l1.
Tabl
e
Cal
cula
tion
Res
ult
of
Co
mpe
nsat
ion
Co
st N
ecess
ary
for
Riv
er C
hann
el I
mpr
ove
men
t
l. P
roje
ct A
ffect
ed
Pe
ople
(PA
Ps)
e.
Ave
rage
Zon
al V
alu
e(P
hp./m
2)
f. C
ost
for
Land
Acq
uisi
tion
(milli
on P
hp.)
g. H
ouse
hold
De
nsity
by
LGU
h. N
o. o
fB
uild
ings
inLa
ndA
cqui
sitio
nA
rea
(N
o.)
i. U
nit C
ost
ofR
esi
dent
ial
Bui
ldin
g(P
hp.)
j. R
epl
ace
me
ntC
ost
for
Re
side
ntia
lB
uild
ings
(m
illion
Php
.)
k. T
ota
l(f
+j)
(mill
ion
Php
.)
Loca
tion
Riv
er
Nam
ea
. P
hase
/P
riorit
y
c. W
idth
of
Riv
er
Impr
ove
me
nt (
m)
d. A
rea
of
Land
Acq
uisi
tion
(ha
)
Gra
nd T
ota
l
Sub
-to
tal
Sub
-to
tal
Sub
-to
tal
A-54
Appendix 3-6(1) Zonal Value for LGUs
Average
ProvinceCity /
MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.
Lower Bicutan 9,464 7,500 11,351Bagunbayan 7,263 - 10,421
Average 8,364 7,500 7,500 10,886Sucat 24,905 47,203Buli 14,125 38,192Cupang 28,464 38,764Alabang 20,609 88,944Bayanan 12,692 23,318Putatan 12,738 16,182Poblacion 12,842 20,077Tunasan 13,406 21,750
Average 17,473 36,804Cuyab 3,880 1,000 3,681San Roque 1,763 750 3,047Landayan 3,375 2,750 3,719
Average 3,006 1,500 1,500 3,482Canlalay 3,442 3,661Dela Paz 1,861 875 1,856Malaban 2,214 625 1,786
Average 2,506 750 750 2,434Sinalhan 4,267 1,250 4,318Aplaya 4,600 1,250 4,278Caingin 4,083 1,250 3,607
Average 4,317 1,250 1,250 4,068Bigaa 3,186 625 2,486Butong 3,071 875 2,518Marinig 2,413 875 2,070Gulod 2,543 875 2,111Baclaran 2,300 875 1,965Maratid 2,582 875 2,432
Average 2,683 833 833 2,264Uwisan 2,425 400 310 1,474Looc 2,637 425 325 2,264Sampirulhan 2,660 500 325 2,086Palingon 1,867 550 367 1,380Lingga 2,600 475 367 1,881Lecheria 3,870 975 950 3,542Halang 3,969 738 638 3,366Bucal 3,876 767 438 3,359Pansol 3,613 988 788 3,229Sucol 3,381 575 400 2,679Masili 2,425 550 425 1,867
Average 3,029 631 485 558 2,466Tadlac 2,775 425 300 255 1,437Bambang 2,990 850 700 600 2,362Malinta 2,750 350 300 213 2,208Mayondon 2,750 425 340 255 1,873Bayog 2,375 750 650 600 1,725
Average 2,728 560 458 385 468 1,921Sto. Domingo 2,093 785 1,353San Antonio 3,106 393 2,463Tagumpay 800 800 442
Average 2,000 659 659 1,419Lamot 1 800 250 573Lamot 2 910 67 704
Average 855 159 159 639San Benito 867 229 602San Felix 1,000 283 672San Roque 1,792 325 1,456Nanhaya 1,850 467 1,700Pagalangan 925 598 907
Average 1,287 380 380 1,067Aplaya 825 250 400Bagong Pook 1,663 397 875
Average 1,244 324 324 638Duhat 1,778 450 1,255Gatid 2,118 522 1,118Bagumbayan 2,269 538 1,685Callios 3,125 550 2,919Santo Angel Norte 1,425 403 912Santisma Cruz 4,876 442 5,178San Pablo Norte 2,875 370 1,355San Pablo Sur 2,925 486 1,287
Average 2,674 470 470 1,964
I
I
MetroManila
MetroManila
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Cabuyao II 2019/6/13
Calamba II 2017/10/15
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Los Banos II 2017/10/15
Bay III 2017/10/15
Calauan III 2017/10/15
Santa Cruz III 2017/10/15
Victoria III 2017/10/15
Location
PhaseResidential
Regular (RR)
Agricultural (A)Effective Date(up-to-date)
Baragay
Laguna Pila III 2017/10/15
2019/7/11
2019/7/11
Santa Rosa I 2019/6/13
San Pedro
Binan
I
I
2020/1/3
2019/6/13
Taguig
Muntinlupa
A-55
Appendix 3-6(2) Zonal Value for LGUs
Average
ProvinceCity /
MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.
Binan 395 20 30 25 338Sampaloc 350 21 21 320San Isidro 400 200 86 143 370Average 382 110 46 78 343
Maytalang II 815 40 221Wawa 395 26 211Poblacion 815 40 805Bagong Silang 770 35 518
Average 699 35 35 439San Juan 626 30 23 45 33 589Longos 667 38 20 43 34 560
Average 647 34 22 44 33 575Ibada del Sur 375 68 344Ibada del Norte 375 68 322
Average 375 68 68 333Baño 451 13 433Burgos 438 16 287Saray 50 5 20Taft 408 14 317Banilan 200 11 74Kabulusan 175 49 112Matikim 130 19 56Casimsim 110 20 50
Average 245 18 18 169Balian 350 75 264Poblacion 350 17 361Sulib 210 16 140Dambo 175 75 119Asufre 175 59 98
Average 252 48 48 196Laguio 495 13 254
Average 495 13 13 254RR A26 A4 A48 A5 Ae.
240 8 11 11 11 10 168Average 240 8 11 11 11 10 168
Lambac 350 33 278Numero 83 19 51
Average 217 26 26 165Bagumbong 475 150 100 432Lubo 490 150 100 489Pagkalinawan 480 150 100 450Palaypalay 475 100 100 423Punta 575 150 100 414Bayugo 490 150 100 425Poblacion-1st district 527 150 100 538Poblacion-2st district 533 150 100 531Poblacion-3st district 500 150 100 503Sipsipin 500 150 100 447
Average 505 145 100 123 465Malaya 911 150 100 838Niogan 914 150 120 821Quisao 838 150 120 783Halayhayin 919 150 100 896Wawa 765 150 120 746Takungan 762 150 120 831
Average 852 150 113 132 819Plaza-Aldea 1,746 150 100 1,910Wawa 1,391 150 100 1,365San Isidro 1,695 150 100 1,702Kaybuto 1,742 150 100 1,737
Average 1,644 150 100 125 1,679Evangelista 861 200 150 735Mabini 870 200 100 797
Average 866 200 125 163 7662015/5/8
2002/12/28FamyLaguna
Laguna Siniloan
Butuhan
Paete 2002/12/28
Laguna Pangil 2002/12/28
2002/12/28PakilLaguna
Pagsanjan 2002/12/28
Laguna
Laguna
Rizal
Rizal
Laguna
Laguna
Rizal
Rizal
Laguna
Mabitac 2002/12/28
2015/5/8Jaly-jala
Baras
2002/12/28
Lumban 2002/12/28
Kalayaan 2002/12/28
2015/5/8Pililla
Tanay 2015/5/8
Location
PhaseResidential
Regular (RR)
Agricultural (A)Effective Date(up-to-date)
Baragay
A-56
Appendix 3-6(3) Zonal Value for LGUs
Average
ProvinceCity /
MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.
San Pedro 1,088 150 120 1,160Bombongan 1,700 150 120 774
Average 1,394 150 120 135 967Calahan 1,121 150 130 100 949Patunhay 963 200 100 819Dalig 789 130 100 688Looc 954 150 100 943Sampad 240 100 50 200Nagsulo 250 100 50 125Ticulio 225 75 50 163
Average 649 129 130 79 113 555Pipindan 478 100 100 388Kalinawan 240 100 50 181Ithan 288 100 50 236Pila-pila 1,065 400 200 970Lunsad 741 100 90 666Libid 1,658 300 200 1,901Calumpang 1,330 150 80 1,362Pantok 1,638 600 500 1,593Palangoy 1,757 850 650 1,729Bilibiran 1,988 150 100 1,859Tagpos 1,967 100 100 1,625San Carlos 2,529 2,567Tayuman 1,971 300 200 1,958Pag-asa 1,753 200 100 1,680
Average 1,386 265 186 226 1,337Kalayaan 887 400 400 864San Vincente 921 400 300 917Bagumbayan 894 300 - 832
Average 901 367 350 358 871Muzon 1,011 150 1,223
Average 1,011 150 150 1,223Source: Website of Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR)
Rizal Morong 2015/5/8
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
2015/5/8
Binagonan 2015/5/8
2015/5/8Cardona
2015/5/8ITaytay
Angono I
Location
PhaseResidential
Regular (RR)
Agricultural (A)Effective Date(up-to-date)
Baragay
A-57
Appendix 3-7 Compensation Cost for Lakeshore Diking System
Pro
vinc
eC
ity /
Mun
icip
ality
c1.
Bui
lt-up
c2.
Agr
icul
tura
lc3
.F
ishp
ond
c4.
Oth
ers
c5.
Tot
al
d1.
RR
d2.
A
e1.
Re
sid
en
tial
Are
a
e2.
Ag
ricu
ltura
lA
rea
e4.
Tot
al
f1.
(No
./2,
500
m2)
f2.
(No
./2,
500
m2)
f3.
(No
./2,
500
m2)
f4. A
ve.
(No
./2,
500m
2)
f5.
Ave
.(N
o./h
a)
k1.
Ave
rage
Fa
mily
Siz
ek2
. P
AP
s(N
os.)
Riz
alA
ngo
noI
3,3
10
0.8
3.8
0.0
32
0.6
32
5.2
90
13
58
71
42
13
51
93
63
0.0
12
09
25
33
,99
74
97
04
.54
15
Riz
alTa
ytay
I1
,35
00
.03
1.9
0.0
51
.98
3.9
1,0
11
15
00
48
48
35
19
36
30
.01
20
05
33
,99
70
48
4.3
0N
CR
Tagu
igI
2,4
90
0.0
0.0
0.0
27
.02
7.0
8,3
64
7,5
00
00
09
49
47
35
.01
40
09
03
,41
10
04
.10
NC
RM
untin
lupa
I9
,87
00
.50
.00
.02
7.0
27
.51
7,4
73
94
09
49
49
47
35
.01
40
75
90
3,4
11
68
16
24
.13
09
17
,02
01
.33
5.7
0.0
42
6.5
46
3.6
10
16
11
63
16
81
17
28
07
25
Lagu
naS
an P
edr
oII
4,0
80
0.2
0.0
0.0
26
.62
6.8
3,0
06
1,5
00
50
52
55
13
73
7.7
15
12
56
15
,36
81
52
04
.51
12
Lagu
naB
inan
II4
,66
01
.61
.20
.03
7.9
40
.82
,50
67
50
41
95
12
55
13
73
7.7
15
12
49
61
5,3
68
15
32
04
3.8
94
4La
guna
San
ta R
osa
II5
,78
01
.70
.00
.02
6.4
28
.04
,31
75
45
73
07
32
55
13
73
7.7
15
12
54
61
5,3
68
15
62
29
3.5
88
9La
guna
Cab
uyao
II8
,39
01
.10
.00
.08
4.0
85
.11
83
88
33
19
01
94
32
92
53
2.3
12
91
37
61
5,3
68
84
10
43
.85
20
Lagu
naC
alam
baII
9,9
20
1.4
10
.80
.03
6.6
48
.83
,02
95
58
42
60
10
24
32
92
53
2.3
12
91
80
61
5,3
68
11
12
13
3.7
66
73
2,8
30
6.0
12
.00
.02
11
.52
29
.51
81
70
25
08
45
52
07
70
3,1
34
Lagu
naLo
s B
ano
sIII
8,2
40
3.3
2.8
0.0
11
.11
7.2
2,7
28
46
89
01
31
03
43
29
25
32
.31
29
42
66
15
,36
82
62
36
53
.91
,66
1La
guna
Bay
III3
,78
01
.91
7.8
0.0
9.0
28
.62
,00
06
59
37
11
71
54
28
17
13
19
.37
71
44
61
5,3
68
89
24
34
.15
92
Lagu
naC
alau
anIII
84
00
.01
5.0
0.0
1.8
16
.88
55
15
90
24
24
28
17
13
19
.37
70
61
5,3
68
02
44
.60
Lagu
naV
icto
ria
III6
,47
00
.43
3.2
0.0
28
.46
1.9
1,2
87
38
05
12
61
31
28
17
13
19
.37
72
96
15
,36
81
81
49
3.6
10
4La
guna
Pila
III4
,75
00
.72
4.7
0.0
31
.65
6.9
1,2
44
32
48
80
88
28
17
13
19
.37
75
36
15
,36
83
21
21
4.4
23
2La
guna
San
ta C
ruz
III8
,82
02
.21
24
.50
.09
6.8
22
3.5
2,6
74
47
05
85
85
64
32
81
71
31
9.3
77
16
76
15
,36
81
03
74
64
.27
03
32
,90
08
.42
17
.90
.01
78
.64
05
.01
98
94
61
,14
48
19
50
41
,64
83
,29
38
2,7
50
15
.62
65
.70
.08
16
.71
,09
8.0
48
01
,07
71
,55
71
,83
21
,14
22
,69
97
,15
1La
guna
Pag
sanj
an1
,16
00
.01
3.8
0.0
0.0
13
.83
82
25
10
35
35
18
18
21
19
.07
60
61
5,3
68
03
54
.30
Lagu
naLu
mba
n8
,90
00
.15
23
.90
.04
02
.49
26
.46
99
35
11
85
18
51
81
82
11
9.0
76
86
15
,36
85
19
04
.23
3La
guna
Kal
ayaa
n3
,84
00
.45
6.3
0.0
9.1
65
.86
47
33
31
92
11
81
82
11
9.0
76
33
61
5,3
68
21
42
4.5
15
0La
guna
Pae
te2
,73
00
.04
9.9
0.0
11
.26
1.0
37
56
80
34
34
18
18
21
19
.07
60
61
5,3
68
03
44
.50
Lagu
naP
akil
6,3
00
0.5
91
.00
.02
1.1
11
2.6
24
51
81
17
18
18
18
21
19
.07
63
56
15
,36
82
24
04
.51
58
Lagu
naP
angi
l4
,26
00
.51
35
.00
.01
4.2
14
9.7
25
24
81
65
67
18
18
21
19
.07
64
26
15
,36
82
69
24
.41
83
Lagu
naS
inilo
an1
,59
00
.05
5.2
0.0
7.2
62
.34
95
00
00
18
18
21
19
.07
60
61
5,3
68
00
4.5
0La
guna
Fam
y6
00
0.0
20
.60
.06
.62
7.3
24
01
00
22
18
18
21
19
.07
60
61
5,3
68
02
4.0
0La
guna
Mab
itac
4,9
60
0.1
16
3.4
0.0
7.8
17
1.3
21
72
60
42
43
18
18
21
19
.07
66
61
5,3
68
44
74
.52
8R
izal
Jala
-jal
a2
3,3
10
2.8
29
.10
.29
1.0
12
3.1
50
51
23
14
36
5018
18
21
19
.07
62
15
53
3,9
97
11
51
65
4.7
1,0
09
Riz
alP
ililla
17
,32
04
.21
31
.30
.01
5.0
15
0.5
85
21
32
36
17
32
09
18
18
21
19
.07
63
21
53
3,9
97
17
13
80
4.4
1,4
12
Riz
alTa
nay
4,5
30
1.2
41
.30
.02
8.5
71
.11
,64
41
25
20
52
72
18
18
21
19
.07
69
45
33
,99
75
01
22
4.6
43
3R
izal
Bar
as3
,29
00
.21
15
.60
.01
3.1
12
9.0
86
61
63
21
88
19
01
81
82
11
9.0
76
19
53
3,9
97
10
20
04
.17
6R
izal
Mo
rong
5,6
70
0.2
24
5.1
0.0
35
.02
80
.41
,39
41
35
33
31
33
418
18
21
19
.07
61
65
33
,99
79
34
34
.47
3R
izal
Car
dona
13
,11
01
.41
.90
.01
12
.01
15
.26
49
11
39
21
11
81
82
11
9.0
76
10
35
33
,99
75
56
64
.04
13
Riz
alB
inan
gona
n1
9,1
10
16
.94
9.8
0.0
36
1.4
42
8.1
1,3
86
22
62
34
11
23
46
35
19
36
30
.01
20
2,0
24
53
3,9
97
1,0
81
1,4
27
4.0
8,0
96
12
0,6
80
28
.61
72
3.2
0.2
11
35
.52
,88
7.5
32
51
,29
21
,61
72
,91
61
,56
73
,18
41
2,0
64
20
3,4
30
44
.31
98
8.9
0.2
19
52
.23
,98
5.5
80
52
,36
93
,17
44
,74
82
,70
95
,88
31
9,2
16
No
te)
a. D
eve
lopm
ent
Pha
se p
ropo
sed
by J
ICA
Sur
vey
Team
.b.
Le
ngth
of
the
Pro
pose
d La
kesh
ore
Dik
e d
elin
eat
ed
on
Go
ogl
e E
arth
.c.
Are
a ca
lcul
ate
d o
n G
IS. C
lass
ifica
tion
of l
and
use
co
mpi
led
by D
epa
rtm
ent
of A
gric
ultu
re is
use
d w
ith
adj
ustm
ent
. c4
. oth
ers
(no
n-pr
odu
ctiv
e la
nd u
se)
incl
ude
s gr
ass
land
, bus
h, fo
rest
s, e
tc.
d. C
alcu
latio
n o
f la
nd p
rice
by
land
use
in e
ach
LGU
bas
ed
on
the
Zo
nal V
alue
pro
vide
d by
BIR
(B
ure
au
of
Inte
rnal
Re
venu
e)
e
. Cal
cula
tion
is d
one
as
follo
ws:
e1
=c1
x d
1, e
2=
(c2
+c3
) x
d2, e
4=
e1
+e
2f.
Est
imat
ion
is d
one
as
follo
ws:
1)
Se
t a
squa
re w
ith a
siz
e o
f 50
m b
y 5
0m
(un
it ar
ea)
on
repr
ese
ntat
ive
loca
tion
(3 s
ites
in e
ach
are
a). 2
) C
alcu
late
the
no
. of b
uild
ings
in e
ach
squa
re. 3
) A
vera
ge t
he
thre
e s
ets
of d
ata
and
conv
ert
it to
no
./ha
as a
n a
vera
ge v
alue
.g.
Num
ber
of a
ffe
cte
d bu
ildin
gs lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
la
kesi
de a
rea
of t
he p
ropo
sed
Lake
sho
re D
ike
. g=
c1
x f4
h. U
se th
e d
ata
of a
vera
ge c
ost
for
cons
truc
tion
of
re
side
ntia
l bui
ldin
g (h
ous
e)
liste
d in
a s
tatis
tical
bo
ok
cons
ide
ring
infla
tion.
i. R
epl
ace
me
nt c
ost
for
affe
cte
d bu
ildin
gs. i
=g
x h
j. j=
e4
+i
k. C
alcu
latio
n o
f P
roje
ct A
ffe
cte
d P
ers
ons
(P
AP
s),
k1 is
ave
rage
fam
ily s
ize
bas
ed
on
a st
atis
tical
bo
ok.
K2
=g
x k1
.
Tabl
e :
Cal
cula
tion
Res
ult
of
Co
mpe
nsat
ion
Co
st N
ecess
ary
for
Land
Acq
uisi
tion
and
Affe
cted
Bui
ldin
gs f
or
Dik
e C
ons
truct
ion
k. P
roje
ct A
ffect
ed
Pe
op
le(P
AP
s)
Sub
-to
tal
Loca
tion
a.
Pha
se /
Prio
rity
b. L
en
gth
of
Lake
sh
ore
Dik
e (
m)
c. A
rea
s by
land
use
with
in la
kesi
de o
f La
kesh
ore
Dik
e(h
a)
d. Z
ona
l Va
lue
(Php
./m2)
e.
Cos
t fo
r La
nd A
cqui
sitio
n (m
illion
Php
.)f.
No.
of
Bui
ldin
gs/ U
nit
Are
a (
No.
/ha
)g.
No.
of
Bui
ldin
gs(N
os.)
h. U
nit
Cos
tof
Re
side
ntia
lB
uild
ing
(Php
.)
j. T
ota
l(e
4+i)
(milli
on P
hp.)
i. R
ep
lace
me
nt
Co
st
for
Re
sid
en
tial
Bu
ildin
gs
(milli
on
Ph
p.)
Sub
-to
tal
Sub
-to
tal
Sub
-to
tal
Tota
l fo
r P
rio
rity
Are
a (I
+II+
III)
Gra
nd T
ota
l
A-58
Appendix 3-8(1) Zonal Value for LGUs
Average
ProvinceCity /
MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.
Lower Bicutan 9,464 7,500 11,351Bagunbayan 7,263 - 10,421
Average 8,364 7,500 7,500 10,886
Sucat 24,905 47,203
Buli 14,125 38,192
Cupang 28,464 38,764
Alabang 20,609 88,944
Bayanan 12,692 23,318
Putatan 12,738 16,182
Poblacion 12,842 20,077
Tunasan 13,406 21,750
Average 17,473 36,804
Cuyab 3,880 1,000 3,681
San Roque 1,763 750 3,047
Landayan 3,375 2,750 3,719
Average 3,006 1,500 1,500 3,482
Canlalay 3,442 3,661
Dela Paz 1,861 875 1,856
Malaban 2,214 625 1,786
Average 2,506 750 750 2,434
Sinalhan 4,267 1,250 4,318
Aplaya 4,600 1,250 4,278
Caingin 4,083 1,250 3,607
Average 4,317 1,250 1,250 4,068
Bigaa 3,186 625 2,486
Butong 3,071 875 2,518
Marinig 2,413 875 2,070
Gulod 2,543 875 2,111
Baclaran 2,300 875 1,965
Maratid 2,582 875 2,432
Average 2,683 833 833 2,264
Uwisan 2,425 400 310 1,474
Looc 2,637 425 325 2,264
Sampirulhan 2,660 500 325 2,086
Palingon 1,867 550 367 1,380
Lingga 2,600 475 367 1,881
Lecheria 3,870 975 950 3,542
Halang 3,969 738 638 3,366
Bucal 3,876 767 438 3,359
Pansol 3,613 988 788 3,229
Sucol 3,381 575 400 2,679
Masili 2,425 550 425 1,867
Average 3,029 631 485 558 2,466
Tadlak 2,775 425 300 255 1,437
Bambang 2,990 850 700 600 2,362
Malinta 2,750 350 300 213 2,208
Mayondon 2,750 425 340 255 1,873
Bayog 2,375 750 650 600 1,725
Average 2,728 560 458 385 468 1,921
Sto. Domingo 2,093 785 1,353
San Antonio 3,106 393 2,463
Tagumpay 800 800 442
Average 2,000 659 659 1,419
Lamot 1 800 250 573
Lamot 2 910 67 704
Average 855 159 159 639
Table: BIR Zonal Value by LGU
LocationPhase
ResidentialRegular(RR)
Agricultural (A)Effective Date (up-
to-date)Baragay
2019/7/11
2019/7/11
Santa Rosa I 2019/6/13
San Pedro
Binan
I
I
2020/1/3
2019/6/13
Taguig
Muntinlupa
Los Banos II 2017/10/15
Bay III 2017/10/15
Calauan III 2017/10/15
Laguna
Laguna
2019/6/13
Calamba II 2017/10/15
I
I
MetroManila
MetroManila
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Cabuyao II
A-59
Appendix 3-8(2) Zonal Value for LGUs
Average
ProvinceCity /
MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.
San Benito 867 229 602
San Felix 1,000 283 672
San Roque 1,792 325 1,456
Nanhaya 1,850 467 1,700
Pagalangan 925 598 907
Average 1,287 380 380 1,067
Aplaya 825 250 400
Bagong Pook 1,663 397 875
Average 1,244 324 324 638
Duhat 1,778 450 1,255
Gatid 2,118 522 1,118
Bagumbayan 2,269 538 1,685
Callios 3,125 550 2,919Santo Angel Norte 1,425 403 912
Santisima Cruz 4,876 442 5,178San Pablo Norte 2,875 370 1,355
San Pablo Sur 2,925 486 1,287
Average 2,674 470 470 1,964
Binan 395 20 30 25 338
Sampaloc 350 21 21 320
San Isidro 400 200 86 143 370
Average 382 110 46 78 343
Maytalang II 815 40 221
Wawa 395 26 211
Poblacion 815 40 805
Bagong Silang 770 35 518
Average 699 35 35 439
San Juan 626 30 23 45 33 589
Longos 667 38 20 43 34 560
Average 647 34 22 44 33 575
Ibada del Sur 375 68 344
Ibada del Norte 375 68 322
Average 375 68 68 333
Baño 451 13 433
Burgos 438 16 287
Saray 50 5 20
Taft 408 14 317
Banilan 200 11 74
Kabulusan 175 49 112
Matikim 130 19 56
Casimsim 110 20 50
Average 245 18 18 169
Balian 350 75 264
Poblacion 350 17 361
Sulib 210 16 140
Dambo 175 75 119
Asufre 175 59 98
Average 252 48 48 196
Laguio 495 13 254
Average 495 13 13 254
RR A26 A4 A48 A5 Ae.
240 8 11 11 11 10 168
Average 240 8 11 11 11 10 168
Lambac 350 33 278
Numero 83 19 51
Average 217 26 26 165
Bagumbong 475 150 100 432
Lubo 490 150 100 489
Pagkalinawan 480 150 100 450
Palaypalay 475 100 100 423
Punta 575 150 100 414
Bayugo 490 150 100 425Poblacion-1st district 527 150 100 538Poblacion-2st district 533 150 100 531Poblacion-3st district 500 150 100 503
Sipsipin 500 150 100 447
Average 505 145 100 123 465
LocationPhase
ResidentialRegular(RR)
Agricultural (A)Effective Date (up-
to-date)Baragay
Laguna Pila III 2017/10/15
Santa Cruz III 2017/10/15
Victoria III 2017/10/15
2002/12/28
Lumban 2002/12/28
Kalayaan 2002/12/28
Mabitac 2002/12/28
2015/5/8Jala-jala
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Rizal
Laguna
Laguna
Butuhan
Paete 2002/12/28
Laguna Pangil 2002/12/28
2002/12/28PakilLaguna
PagsanjanLaguna 2002/12/28
2002/12/28FamyLaguna
Laguna Siniloan
A-60
Appendix 3-8(3) Zonal Value for LGUs
Average
ProvinceCity /
MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.
Malaya 911 150 100 838
Niogan 914 150 120 821
Quisao 838 150 120 783
Halayhayin 919 150 100 896
Wawa 765 150 120 746
Takungan 762 150 120 831
Average 852 150 113 132 819
Plaza-Aldea 1,746 150 100 1,910
Wawa 1,391 150 100 1,365
San Isidro 1,695 150 100 1,702
Kaybuto 1,742 150 100 1,737
Average 1,644 150 100 125 1,679
Evangelista 861 200 150 735
Mabini 870 200 100 797
Average 866 200 125 163 766
San Pedro 1,088 150 120 1,160
Bombongan 1,700 150 120 774
Average 1,394 150 120 135 967
Calahan 1,121 150 130 100 949
Patunhay 963 200 100 819
Dalig 789 130 100 688
Looc 954 150 100 943
Sampad 240 100 50 200
Nagsulo 250 100 50 125
Ticulio 225 75 50 163
Average 649 129 130 79 113 555
Pipindan 478 100 100 388
Kalinawan 240 100 50 181
Ithan 288 100 50 236
Pila-pila 1,065 400 200 970
Lunsad 741 100 90 666
Libid 1,658 300 200 1,901
Calumpang 1,330 150 80 1,362
Pantok 1,638 600 500 1,593
Palangoy 1,757 850 650 1,729
Bilibiran 1,988 150 100 1,859
Tagpos 1,967 100 100 1,625
San Carlos 2,529 2,567
Tayuman 1,971 300 200 1,958
Pag-asa 1,753 200 100 1,680
Average 1,386 265 186 226 1,337
Kalayaan 887 400 400 864
San Vincente 921 400 300 917
Bagumbayan 894 300 - 832
Average 901 367 350 358 871
Muzon 1,011 150 1,223
Average 1,011 150 150 1,223
Source: Website of Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR)
LocationPhase
ResidentialRegular(RR)
Agricultural (A)Effective Date (up-
to-date)Baragay
2015/5/8ITaytay
2015/5/8Pililla
Tanay 2015/5/8
Angono I 2015/5/8
Binagonan 2015/5/8
2015/5/8Cardona
Baras
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
Rizal
2015/5/8
Rizal Morong 2015/5/8
A-61
top related