appendix table of contents - jica

62
APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix 1 Joint Meeting MaterialHandoutAppendix 1-1 Joint Meeting Member ................................................................... A-1 Appendix 1-2 Joint Meeting Part-1 ....................................................................... A 20 Appendix 1-3 Joint Meeting Part-2 ....................................................................... A -28 Appendix 2 Materials Related to Economic Analysis ............................................ A -42 Appendix 3 Materials Related to Compensation Costs .......................................... A -50

Upload: others

Post on 20-Apr-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

APPENDIX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appendix 1 Joint Meeting Material(Handout)

Appendix 1-1 Joint Meeting Member ................................................................... A-1

Appendix 1-2 Joint Meeting Part-1 ....................................................................... A 20

Appendix 1-3 Joint Meeting Part-2 ....................................................................... A -28

Appendix 2 Materials Related to Economic Analysis ............................................ A -42

Appendix 3 Materials Related to Compensation Costs .......................................... A -50

Page 2: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 1

Appendix 1-1 Joint Meeting Member

A-1

Page 3: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A joint meeting with the Philippine related organizations was planned on March 13, 2020, but the meeting

was canceled due to the influence of COVID-19. Therefore, the meeting materials were distributed to related

organizations, and the materials and comments on this survey were collected.

The table below shows the list of participating organizations of the Joint Meeting and the meeting request

form scheduled to be held on March 13, 2020.

No. Organization Representative Person 1 DPWH EMIL K. SADAIN, CESO II

(Undersecretary for UPMO Operations) 2 DPWH-UPMO RAMON A. ARRIOLA, CESO III

(Project Director, UPMO-FCMC) 3 DPWH-UPMO LEONILA R. MERCADO

(Project Manager I, UPMO-FCMC) 4 LLDA General Manager JAIME JOEY C. MEDINA 5 MMDA Director BALTAZAR N. MELGAR 6 DENR Secretary ROY A. CIMATU 7 NEDA Assistant Secretary RODERICK M. PLANTA 8 DOST-PAGASA Dr. VICENTE B. MALANO 9 DOST-PHIVOLCS Undersecretary RENATO U. SOLIDUM, JR. 10 UP-National Hydraulic

Research Center Director ROBERTO S. SORIANO, Ph.D.

11 DILG Secretary EDUARDO M. ANO 12 Province of Rizal Hon. REBECCA ALCANTARA YNARES 13 Province of Cavite Hon. JUANITO VICTOR C. REMULLA, JR. 14 Province of Laguna Hon. RAMIL L. HERNANDEZ 15 City of Bacoor Hon. LANI MERCADO REVILLA 16 City of Taguig Hon. LINO EDGARDO CAYETANO 17 City of Muntinlupa Hon. JAIME DELA ROSA FRESNEDI 18 City of Las Pinas Hon. IMELDA T. AGUILAR 19 City of Paranaque Hon. EDWIN L. OLIVAREZ 20 JICA Philippines Office Ms. Ayumu OHSHIMA

A-2

Page 4: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-3

Page 5: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-4

Page 6: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-5

Page 7: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-6

Page 8: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-7

Page 9: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-8

Page 10: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-9

Page 11: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-10

Page 12: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-11

Page 13: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-12

Page 14: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-13

Page 15: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-14

Page 16: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-15

Page 17: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-16

Page 18: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-17

Page 19: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-18

Page 20: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-19

Page 21: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 1

Appendix 1-2 Joint Meeting Part-1

A-20

Page 22: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. eCTII)

Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. eNK)

Follow -up Study on Parañaque Spillway Project

JOINT MEETING

Part-1 Update of Draft Comprehensive

Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay

Japan International Cooperation Agency

May 8, 2020

■Topics

2

Part-1

1. Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay

Part-2

2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.2 Additional Economic Benefit which Include the Characteristic of Laguna

de Bay Inundation Phenomena (long-term inundation)

2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate

Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River

2.2.4 Result of Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.3 Improvement Effects Other Than Economic Evaluation

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

2.5 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan in Conservation and Sustainable

Development of Laguna de Bay

A-21

Page 23: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

<1 Goals and Safety Level of Flood Control>

3

• Considering the development status of Laguna lakeshore area, the historical flooding

damage, the impact of climate change, etc., prevent and reduce inundation damage to

1/100 probability floods after climate change by gradually constructing Parañaque spillway

and lakeshore diking system over 30 years

<2 Design Flood Level eDFL)>

• The Design Flood Level (DFL) of Laguna de Bay is set at 13.8m

<3 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan>

Structural Measures (water level rise suppression and flood damage reduction)

• Construction of Parañaque Spillway (underground tunnel, Diameter13m

*the inner diameter should be closely inspected in about 0.1 m in next F/S stage.

• Lakeshore Diking System (Total length 82.75km, including drainage channels, drainage stations, back

levee, bridges, etc.)

Non-Structural Measures

• Stricter development regulations within lake management boundaries (EL.12.5m or less)

• Promotion of land use regulations and ensuring the safety of residents in flood-prone areas (including

resettlement)

• Hazard map creation, evacuation plan, disaster prevention awareness-raising activities for residents,

local disaster prevention plan

• Construction of flood forecasting and warning system

4

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

<4 Outline of Parañaque Spillway>

• Commercial facilities and houses are dense on the assumed route of the Parañaque Spillway,

and if the open channel type is adopted, many residents will be relocated, making

commercialization difficult. In order to minimize social impact, the drainage channel will be

Underground Pressure Tunnel type.

• In the case of climate change, Parañaque Spillway requires a tunnel inner diameter of 13m

and a maximum discharge rate of 240m3 / s to reduce the highest water level of Laguna

Lake at 14.5m during a 1/100 probability flood to 13.8m eDFL).

Operation Level of Parañaque Spillway

・January~May(Non-flooding Period):non-operation

・June~July(water level raising Period):11.5m

・August~December(water level lowering Period):12.0m

Figure 1-2 Effect of Parañaque Spillway of 100-year Return Period

(with Climate Change, D=13m, Max. Discharge=240m3/s)

Scale of Structures

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

14.5

15.0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Dis

cha

rge

of

Pa

ran

aq

ue

Sp

illw

ay (m

3/s

)

Lake

Wa

ter

Leve

l(m

)

Return Period 100-year Existing Condition RCP4.5_without PSW

RCP4.5_withPSW RCP4.5_PSW_Discharge

Operation start level

Aug-Dec:12.0mOperation start level

Jun-July:11.5m

Parañaque Spillway

discharge

14.5m → 13.8m0.7m decline

A-22

Page 24: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

<Alignment Plan>・The Parañaque spillway route (underground tunnel) will be studied based on the following four plans.

Figure 1-3 Routes of Parañaque Spillway

Route-1

Route-3

Route-2A

Route-2B

Item Route-1 Route-2A Route-2B Route-3

Route

Location of Intake Lower Bicutan Sucat Sucat Sucat

Location of OutletSouth Parañaque

RiverSan Dionisio

River

Zapote River Zapote River

Length of Open Channel 1.2km 0.7km 0.7km 0.6km

Inner Diameter of Tunnel D13m D13m D13m D13m

Length of Tunnel 6.0km 7.2km 8.7km 8.8km

Depth of Tunnel from Surface > 50m < 30m < 30m > 50m

Height of Intake Vertical Shaft 75m - - 75m

Height of Outlet Vertical Shaft 75m 32m 32m 75m

Length of River Improvement 4.0km 8.0km 1.0km 1.0km

Lower Bicutan

Sucat

5

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

<Outline of Lakeshore Diking System>

15.0m

13.8m

Figure 1-3 Lakeshore Dike Typical Cross Section

6

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

• To construct a lakeshore diking system in the priority area along the lakeshore area to prevent

inundation. Lakeshore diking system consists of lakeshore dike, drainage canals, pumping stations,

community roads, bridges, etc., and resolves flood damage caused by rising water levels in Laguna de Bay.

• Lakeshore dike elevation will be 15.0m, considering 1.2m free board add to 13.8m (DFL).

• Lakeshore dike will be constructed on lakeshores of Laguna Lake elevation of 12 m to 12.5 m.

• Prioritize the location of lakeshore diking systems based on land use, beneficiary population, beneficiary

area, etc. in the shore area, and arrange lakeshore diking from areas with higher priority.

• The length of the planned lakeshore dike will be about 83 km compared to about 220 km around the lake

shore, and non-structural measures (warning systems, etc.) will be used for areas where there are few

assets and the economic effect is low for arranging lakeshore diking system.

A-23

Page 25: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

<7 Plan of Lakeshore Diking System ~Approx. 83km divided into three phases~>

• Lakeshore Diking System is implemented in 82.75 km from Angono to Santa Cruz in three phases.

・ Phase I : Angono to Muntinlupa、17.02km in Length

・ Phase II : San Pedro to Calamba、32.83km in Length

・ Phase III : Los Banos to Santa Cruz、32.90km in Length

Figure 1-4 Layout of Lakeshore Diking System (Phase I, II, III)

Table 1-1 Length of Lakeshore Diking System

(Phase I, II, III)

7

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

<8 Plan of Drainage Stations ~Approx. 30 Stations divided into three phases~>

Table 1-2 Drainage Stations (Phase I, II, III)

8

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

• Drainage pumping stations for draining inland water

are implemented in three phases as part of the

82.75km Lakeshore Diking System planned from

Angono to Santa Cruz.

Figure1-5 Location of Drainage Stations(Phase I, II, III)

No River Basin

Retarding Pond Capacity of

Pomp

em3/s)Area

(ha)

Depth

(m)

Capacity

(m3)

1

SB-23 Muntinlupa

SB23-RB1 0.9 2.0 17,000 5.0

2 SB23-RB2 1.2 2.0 23,000 7.0

3 SB23-RB3 1.4 2.0 27,000 9.0

4 SB23-RB4 0.5 2.0 10,000 3.0

5 SB23-RB5 0.2 2.0 4,900 2.0

6

SB-22 San Pedoro

SB22-RB1 0.5 2.0 9,000 2.0

7 SB22-RB2 1.7 2.0 34,000 7.0

8 SB22-RB3 1.2 2.0 23,500 5.0

9SB-21 Binan

SB21-RB1 6.4 2.0 128,200 27.0

10 SB21-RB2 1.3 2.0 25,000 5.0

11

SB-20 Sta. Rosa

SB20-RB1 0.8 2.0 16,000 4.0

12 SB20-RB2 2.9 2.0 58,000 14.0

13 SB20-RB3 0.9 2.0 18,000 4.0

14 SB20-RB4 7.5 2.0 149,000 36.0

15 SB-19San

CristobalSB19-RB1 5.7 2.0 113,000 27.0

16 SB-18 San Juan SB18-RB1 2.9 2.0 57,000 15.0

17

SB-17 Los Banos

SB17-RB1 1.6 2.0 32,800 13.0

18 SB17-RB2 1.0 2.0 20,200 8.0

19 SB17-RB3 2.9 2.0 58,100 23.0

20 SB17-RB4 0.3 2.0 5,800 2.0

21SB-16 Calauan

SB16-RB1 0.4 2.0 7,000 2.0

22 SB16-RB2 0.3 2.0 5,800 2.0

23

SB-15 Pila

SB15-RB1 0.8 2.0 16,900 4.0

24 SB15-RB2 4.4 2.0 87,900 23.0

25 SB15-RB3 7.1 2.0 141,300 37.0

26SB-14 Sta. Cruz

SB14-RB1 5.9 2.0 118,000 26.0

27 SB14-RB2 0.7 2.0 14,000 3.0

28 SB-02 Taytay SB02-RB1 1.0 2.0 20,000 6.0

Total 62.0 1,240,400 321.0

A-24

Page 26: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

<9 Non-Structural Measures>

• As a countermeasure until Parañaque spillway and Lakeshore Diking System are completed,

non-structural measures (warning system, etc.) are promoted in areas where there are few

assets and the economic effect is low for arranging Lakeshore Diking System.

Table 1-3 Proposed Non-Structural Measures for Flood Mitigation of Lowland Area of Laguna de Bay

Proposed Non-Structural Measure Description

Strict Implementation of Land Use

Management Regulation in Lake

Public Area below El. 12.5m

Existing reclamation activity, houses, factories, stockyards should

strictly be regulated and controlled. Lake boundary at El. 12.5m

should be clearly determined.

Evacuation/Resettlement from Flood

Dangerous Area

Promotion of resettlement from flood dangerous areas below El.

12.5m to safety areas.

Improvement of the Disaster Risk

Management System, Preparation of

Hazard Maps and Education and

Information Campaign for Inhabitants

Some LGUs along the lakeshore area have prepared the DRRMP.

However, DRRMP for the entire Laguna Lake is not prepared yet. It

is needed. Assistance in preparation of Hazard maps along the

lakeshore and inflow rivers. Using Hazard maps, education for

inhabitants through LGUs.

Proposed Flood Forecasting and

Warning System for the Laguna de

Bay Basin

Flood forecasting and warning for flash floods of inflow rivers and

lake floods should be established. Warning system for inhabitants

along the Parañaque Spillway should be established for proper

operation.

9

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

<10 Project Implementation Plan ~Long-term plan for 30 years and priority implementation

of Parañaque Spillway~>

• Parañaque Spillway can be expected to be completed in about 5 to 9 years (depend on routes), and

flood mitigation effect is expected over the entire Laguna Lakeshore area as soon as possible. On the

other hand, Lakeshore Diking System requires a lot of resettlement and land acquisition, and is

expected to have an impact on fisheries historically. It takes a long time (20-30 years) to complete.

Therefore, it is appropriate as a flood management plan to implement Parañaque spillway as a priority

early (about 5 to 9 years for construction), and steadily implement Lakeshore Diking System over a

long period of time (about 30 years) considering reduction of water level effect of Parañaque Spillway.

Table 1-4 Project Implementation Plan

No Component

30-year Project Implementation

(2021-2050)10 years

(2021-2030)

Next 10 years

(2031-2040)

Final 10 years

(2041-2050)

I Structural Measures

1) Parañaque Spillway

2) Lakeshore Diking System*

Phase I (17.02km)

Phase II (32.83km)

Phase III (32.90km)

II Non-Structural Measures

1) Strict Implementation of Land Use Management Regulation

2) Evacuation/Resettlement from Flood Dangerous Area

3) Improvement of the Disaster Risk Management System

4) Proposed Flood Forecasting and Warning System

10

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

* Implementation of Lakeshore Diking System was assumed based on construction quantity and did not include the period for

house evacuation and land acquisition.

A-25

Page 27: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

11

<11 Project Cost and Project Evaluation>

• Cost and Compensation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay

Parañaque Spillway (PSW)

Lakeshore Dike System eLDS)

Cost emillion PHP)

Construction Design and

Supervision

Price

Escalation

Physical

ContingencyCompensation Administration Vat Total

PSW LDS

PSW (Route-1) + LDS 46,203 44,945 9,115 34,286 13,455 15,293 3,266 19,596 186,158

PSW (Route-2A) + LDS 41,888 44,945 8,683 32,318 12,783 16,028 3,133 18,797 178,576

PSW (Route-2B) + LDS 41,263 44,945 8,621 32,159 12,699 16,428 3,122 18,734 177,971

PSW (Route-3) + LDS 50,736 44,945 9,568 35,486 14,074 15,941 3,415 20,490 194,654

Table 1-5 Cost of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)

Parañaque Spillway

(PSW)

Lakeshore Dike System

eLDS)

Parañaque Spillway Lakeshore Diking System

Compensation

Cost

(million PHP)

Land

Acquisition

(ha)

House

Evacuation

(house)

Affected

People

(person)

Compensation

Cost

(million PHP)

Land

Acquisition

(ha)

House

Evacuation

(house)

Affected

People

(person)

PSW (Route-1) + LDS 2,147 12.8 340 1,390

13,146 1,284.9 2,913 11,524PSW (Route-2A) + LDS 2,882 7.7 360 1,470

PSW (Route-2B) + LDS 3,283 12.9 360 1,470

PSW (Route-3) + LDS 2,795 6.8 360 1,470

Table 1-6 Compensation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)

11

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

<11 Project Cost and Project Evaluation>

• Project Evaluation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay

12

Parañaque Spillway (PSW)

+Lakeshore Dike System eLDS)

Annual

Benefit

emillion PHP)

NPV of B

emillion PHP)

NPV of C

emillion PHP)EIRR

NPV

emillion PHP)B/C

PSW (Route-1) + LDS 22,475 80,132 41,043 16.3% 39,088 1.95

PSW (Route-2A) + LDS 21,279 95,871 42,474 19.6% 53,397 2.26

PSW (Route-2B) + LDS 21,181 95,459 42,427 19.7% 53,032 2.25

PSW (Route-3) + LDS 23,751 84,165 44,060 16.2% 40,105 1.91

Table 1-7 Evaluation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

A-26

Page 28: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

13

<12 Parañaque Spillway Project Cost and Project Evaluation>

Parañaque Spillway (PSW)

Parañaque Spillway

Compensation

Cost

(million PHP)

Land

Acquisition

(ha)

House

Evacuation

(house)

Affected

People

(person)

Construction

Period

(month)

PSW (Route-1) 2,147 12.8 340 1,390 98

PSW (Route-2A) 2,882 7.7 360 1,470 60

PSW (Route-2B) 3,283 12.9 360 1,470 64

PSW (Route-3) 2,795 6.8 360 1,470 105

Table 1-8 Compensation of Parañaque Spillway (with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

Parañaque Spillway

(PSW)

Cost emillion PHP)

ConstructionDesign and

Supervision

Price

Escalation

Physical

ContingencyCompensation Administration Vat Total

PSW (Route-1) 46,203 4,620 7,797 5,862 2,147 1,333 7,996 75,959

PSW (Route-2A) 41,888 4,189 5,830 5,191 2,882 1,200 7,197 68,376

PSW (Route-2B) 41,263 4,126 5,671 5,106 3,283 1,189 7,134 67,771

PSW (Route-3) 50,736 5,074 8,997 6,481 2,795 1,482 8,890 84,454

Table 1-9 Cost of Parañaque Spillway (with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)

<12 Parañaque Spillway Project Cost and Project Evaluation>

Parañaque Spillway

(PSW)

Annual

Benefit

emillion PHP)

NPV of B

emillion PHP)

NPV of C

emillion PHP)EIRR B/C

PSW (Route-1) 19,676 69,586 26,013 18.9% 2.68

PSW (Route-2A) 18,480 86,201 27,444 23.1% 3.14

PSW (Route-2B) 18,382 85,790 27,397 23.1% 3.13

PSW (Route-3) 20,952 73,619 29,030 18.6% 2.54

Table 1-10 Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway Project(with Climate Change、PSW D=13m、Shield)

1.Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna

de Bay

14

A-27

Page 29: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 1

Appendix 1-3 Joint Meeting Part-2

A-28

Page 30: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. eCTII)

Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. eNK)

Follow -up Study on Parañaque Spillway Project

JOINT MEETING

Part-2 Detailed Explanation of

Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

Japan International Cooperation Agency

May 8, 2020

■Topics

Part-1

1. Update of Draft Comprehensive Flood Management Plan for Laguna de Bay

Part-2

2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.2 Additional Economic Benefit which Include the Characteristic of Laguna

de Bay Inundation Phenomena (long-term inundation)

2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate

Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River

2.2.4 Result of Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.3 Improvement Effects Other Than Economic Evaluation

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

2.5 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan in Conservation and Sustainable

Development of Laguna de Bay2

A-29

Page 31: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

3

2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)

1) Setting the Planning Scale in Laguna de Bay

According to the 2018 survey, the design scale at Laguna de Bay was set at 100-year

return period in accordance with the DPWH guidelines (DGCS,2015).

ClassificationEvaluation

IndexDesign Scale

Setting Rationale

Flood caused by the water level rise of Laguna de Bay

Water Level

100-year Since Laguna de Bay is considered as one of the important basins in the Philippines, the design scale is set to a 100-year which is equivalent to the value of the Pasig - Marikina River Basin.

The water level observed data of Laguna de Bay has been accumulated over a long period of time as compared to the rainfall data. Therefore, the water level probability scale is adopted.

Table 2-1-1 Design Scale of Laguna de Bay in 2018 Study

General Criteria for Flood Control, DGCS2015 volume 3

i. Design Flood ii. Climate ChangeClimate change should be considered as a

part of the design and scoping for the

project.

River Type Design Flood

Principal and Major Rivers(40 km2 drainage area and above) 100 year

For Small Rivers (below 40 km2 drainage area) 50 year

Source; Design Guidelines, Criteria & Standards volume 3 Water Engineering

project, 2015 DPWH

4

2) Climate Change

• In the 2018 survey, future changes in rainfall in the

study area were organized using the results of the

Regional Climate Model (RCM) implemented by

PAGASA, and the impact on the Laguna de Bay lake

level was examined.

• In this follow-up study, study team discussed with

PAGASA (January 27, 2020) and confirmed the latest

climate change model (2018 version). Currently,

PAGASA forecasts future weather based on RCP

scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways,

IPCC Fifth Report).

• PAGASA makes predictions based on RCP4.5 and

RCP8.5 scenarios. Using the prediction results for

each Province described in the report "Observed

Climate Trends and Projected Climate Change in the

Philippines, 2018" obtained from PAGASA, the impact

on the Laguna Lake water level taking into account

climate change was examined.Source: PAGASA (Observed Climate Trends and

Projected Climate Change in the Philippines,2018)

Table 2-1-2 Result of Climate Change

Evaluation(PAGASA) 2018:Related Provinces of the Laguna de Bay Lakeshore area

2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)

Predicting rainfall increase and decrease due to

climate change ePAGASA)

A-30

Page 32: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

5

Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal NCR Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal NCR Average Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal12~2 124.9 629.2 827.7 262.4 107.5 55.7 43.9 31.6 51.5 55.5 47.64 194.5 905.2 397.4 397.43~5 242.8 386.8 382.7 241.5 198.5 17.9 24.8 18.9 25.6 25.7 22.58 286.2 482.6 303.4 303.46~8 985.7 845 670 1001.3 1170.2 9.4 -2.1 5.3 -1.7 -0.4 2.1 1,078.6 827.3 983.9 983.99~11 579 1065.5 1229.3 821.8 758.7 6.7 5.7 7.6 12.7 7.7 8.08 618.0 1,127.0 926.5 926.5

Present Condition 1971-2000

Rainfall (mm)MonthFuture 2036-2065 (RCP4.5)

Rainfall (mm)Rate of Rainfall change (%)

Cavite Laguna Quezon Rizal NCR Total12~2 3.7 21.7 0.8 17.1 4.5 47.83~5 1.2 12.3 0.5 8.5 2.1 24.56~8 0.6 -1.0 0.1 -0.6 -0.0 -0.9

9~11 0.5 2.8 0.2 4.2 0.6 8.3Average 1.5 8.9 0.4 7.3 1.8 19.9

Month Rate of Rainfall change (%)_Weighted averageFuture 2036-2065 (RCP4.5)

Table 2-1-3 The Result of 3-month Rain Change Rate by RCP4.5

Table 2-1-4 Area Weight Average of Relevant

Province

• Predicted rainfall based on the RCP scenario will increase by about 50% from

December to February and increase by about 25% from March to May, while it will

decrease by 0.9% from June to August in the rainy season and from September to

November is forecast to increase by about 8%

Sea Level Raise

Based on RCP 4.5 scenarios (Representative

Concentration Pathways, IPCC Fifth Report)

of PAGASA, sea level raise is set 20 cm raise. Source: PAGASA (Observed Climate Trends and

Projected Climate Change in the Philippines,2018)

2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)

6

2. Detailed Explanation of Comprehensive Flood Management Plan

2.1 Setting Design Flood Level (DFL)

In order to determine the Design Flood Level (DFL) of Laguna de Bay, It is necessary to

comprehensively evaluate the following 3 issues;

- Consistency with existing flood control facilities,

- Flood control safety level, and

- Cost and B/C.

1) Consistency with Existing Flood Control Facilities

West of Manggahan Lakeshore Dike was completed in 2007 with DFL of 13.8m under the

Metro Manila Flood Control Project - West of Manggahan Floodway.

2) Flood Control Safety Level

The DFL shall not increase inundation risk

compared to the recent maximum water level

of 13.85m during Typhoon Ondoy in 2009.

The planned DFL will be set to 13.8 m or less

in consideration of the past flood levels.

3) Cost and B/C

A higher safety level (Lower DFL) is desirable,

14.03m(1972)

13.58m(1978)13.55m(1988)

13.85m(2009)13.83m(2012)

10

11

12

13

14

15

1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Wat

er L

evel

(m

)

Figure Historical Maximum Lake Water Level

Typhoon Ondoy

Maximum WL:13.85m

From the above comprehensive evaluation, 13.8m is determined as the Design Flood Level of

Laguna de Bay.

but if the safety level is further increased, the project cost will be increased, and the B/C will

be decreased.

A-31

Page 33: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

7

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

1) Revised Operation Level of Parañaque Spillway

In this study, the initial operation level of Parañaque Spillway was revised as follows; to

lower the lake level of Laguna de Bay before the flood season and to increase the storage

capacity during the flood.

In addition, the starting operation level of the four (4) drainage stations installed at West

Manggahan Lakeshore dike is 11.5m.

<Operation Level of Parañaque Spillway>

・January~May(Non-flooding Period) :non operation

・June~July(water level raising Period) :11.5m

・August~December(water level lowering Period) :12.0m

→Due to a severe water shortage in Metro Manila (March 2019), to avoid the impact on water intake during

the dry season of water treatment facilities that utilize Laguna de Bay as a water resources, Parañaque

Spillway will not operate during non-flooding season (January to May) .

There are two (2) existing water purification facilities of Maynilad and Manila Water, Laguna de Bay as a water

resources.

In consultation with Maynilad and Manila Water, we confirmed the water level at Laguna de Bay, which will affect

water intake. However, there has been no event that water cannot be collected due to the low water level at

Laguna de Bay. It is said that the water quality (salinity) of Laguna de Bay affects the water intake

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

14.5

15.0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Dis

cha

rge

of

Pa

ran

aq

ue

Sp

illw

ay

(m

3/s

)

Lak

eW

ate

rLe

ve

l(m

)

Return Period 100-year Existing Condition RCP4.5_without PSW

RCP4.5_withPSW RCP4.5_PSW_Discharge

8

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

• Laguna de Bay Lake level, taking into account climate change, is 14.5m with a 100-year return period without

Parañaque Spillway.

• Water level will be increased due to increase precipitation during non-flooding period and then water level before

flood period of June will be more than 11.5m and Parañaque Spillway can operate from early June. Therefore water

level before flooding period will be same level as 100-year return period without climate change and Parañaque

Spillway.

• 100-year probability with the Parañaque Spillway (Diameter D=13.0m) can reduce the water level to 13.8m (DFL) .

• Parañaque Spillway is a facility that responds to climate change.

No.

Climate

ChangeParañaque Spillway WL (m)

100-yr Yes No Yes No Diameter

1 ✔ ✔ - 14.3m

2 ✔ ✔ - 14.5m

3 ✔ ✔ 12.0m 13.9m

4 ✔ ✔ 13.0m 13.8m

Figure 2-2-1 Analysis Results of Water Level Fluctuation

(100-year,D=13m)

70cm

Decline 13.8m

14.5m

Parañaque Spillway

discharge

During this period, the rising

water level due to climate

change will be released by the

Parañaque Spillway.

Operation Level:11.5m

Operation Level:12.0m

A-32

Page 34: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Inun

datio

n da

ys

without PSW with PSW

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

14.5

15.0

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

201

2

201

3

Dis

ch

arge

of P

SW

(m

3/S

)

La

ke S

urf

ace

Level

(m)

2008/1/1 〜2013/12/31 Operation Level SML WL without PSW wPSW_June-July:11.5 Augst-December:12 Discharge of PSW

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

14.5

15.0

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

Dis

ch

arge

of

PS

W (

m3

/S)

Lake S

urf

ace

Level

(m)

2002/1/1 〜2007/12/31 Operation Level SML WL without PSW wPSW_June-July:11.5 Augst-December:12 Discharge of PSW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

9

Figure 2-2-2 Long-term prediction Result from 2002 to 2013 with operation level Jun-Juy:11.5m Aug-Dec:12m

(Diameter of Tunnel is 13.0m)

Typhoon OndoyHabagat

Non-Operation Non-Operation

13.8m→13.2m0.6m decline

13.8m→13.3m0.5m decline

66 days

50daysNo flooding

No flooding

72 days reduction

Typhoon Ondoy

Reduction of Inundation Period

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

WL withoutPSW ①

With PSW②

①-②WL withoutPSW ③

With PSW④

days(③-④)

2002 12.6 12.6 12.2 0.4 8 0 82003 11.7 11.6 11.6 0.0 0 0 02004 11.9 11.7 11.7 0.0 0 0 02005 12.2 12.1 12.0 0.1 0 0 02006 12.3 12.3 12.2 0.1 0 0 02007 12.5 12.5 12.3 0.1 0 0 02008 12.1 12.2 12.0 0.2 0 0 02009 13.9 13.8 13.2 0.6 110 38 722010 12.1 12.1 11.6 0.5 0 0 02011 12.7 12.7 12.2 0.5 17 0 172012 13.8 13.8 13.3 0.5 108 42 662013 13.0 13.1 12.6 0.5 62 12 50

Min 11.7 11.6 11.6 0.0 0 0 0Ave 12.6 12.5 12.3 0.3 25 8 18Max 13.9 13.8 13.3 0.6 110 42 72

days of more than 12.5mSML

Observed

Maximum Water level

Non-Operation

10

I. In the past, the Parañaque Spillway has been considered several times but has not

been realized. The main reason for this was that, besides the size of the project

funds, social impacts such as relocation and land acquisition were very large.

II. In the 2018 survey, from the viewpoint of minimizing its social impact, it was

examined in the “draft of underground waterway “ applying the recently enacted

Philippine law `` Private land rights do not occur below 50 m underground ‘’.

III. In this follow-up study, from the viewpoint of reducing its project cost, 2018 study

was reviewed and revised the routes of Parañaque Spillway to shorten the

shorten of vertical shaft considering that construction of shafts (entrance and

exit) was a large part of construction cost and construction period.

IV. This proposed route can omit the construction of the shaft at the entrance of the

spillway, reduce the cost and the construction period, can construct most of the

tunnels on national land, and also reduce the social impact.

2) Setting a Route Plan* to Reduce Costs

* Detail study of routes shall be executed in Feasibility Study

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

A-33

Page 35: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

11

Route-2 in 2018 study

Revised Route-2-ASucat – San DionisioL-tunnel=7.2km L-open=0.7km

Figure 2-2-3 Alignment Plan Drawing of Parañaque Spillway, 2020

Alignment of Parañaque Spillway in 2020 Follow-up St udy

- Route-1 : Lower Bicutan – South Parañaque (same route as 2018)- Revised Route-2-A :Sucat – San Dionisio- Revised Route-2-B :Sucat – Zapote- Route-3 : Sucat – Zapote(same route as 2018)

Revised Rout-2-A Longitudinal Profile

Revised Route-2-BSucat – ZapoteL-tunnel=8.7km L-open=0.7km

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

12

Table 2-2-1 Cost Breakdown of Parañaque Spillway (Shield method, D=13m)

Route

Cost(million PHP)

Project

Cost

Construction Cost

Total TunnelVertical

Shaft

Open

Channel

River

Improvement

Soil

Disposal

Route 1 75,959 46,203 22,091 13,636 5,392 2,827 2,257

Route 2-A 68,376 41,888 25,665 4,629 4,062 5,671 1,861

Route 2-B 67,771 41,263 29,682 4,618 4,062 709 2,192

Route 3 84,454 50,736 29,926 13,620 4,044 706 2,440

Route

Compensation

Cost

(million PHP)

Land

Acquisition

(ha)

House

Evacuation

(house)

People affected

(person)

Construction

Period

(month)

Route 1 2,147 12.8 340 1,390 98

Route 2-A 2,882 7.7 360 1,470 60

Route 2-B 3,283 12.9 360 1,470 64

Route 3 2,795 6.8 360 1,470 105

Table 2-2-2 Compensation Cost, Land Acquisition, House Evacuation, Affected

people, Construction period (Shield method, D=13m)

2.2 Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

2.2.1 Revised Operation Level and Routes of Parañaque Spillway

A-34

Page 36: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

13

In this follow-up study, considering the flood characteristics of

Laguna de Bay (long-term inundation), attempted to calculate the

following benefits that were not quantified in the 2018 study.

1)Reduction of damage to household business suspension

Flooded house count (every 0.5m) x shortened days x

minimum labor (356PHP / day)

=150 million PHP/year

2)Reduction of fishery damage due to flooding Estimated to be nine (9) million pesos / day based on the amount of damage and days of

flooding during the typhoon in 2009.

Inundation reduction days in each probability year x Day damage amount x

Probability of occurrence

=160 million PHP/year

2.2.2 Additional Economic Benefit which Include the Characteristic of Laguna de Bay Inundation Phenomena (long-term inundation)

:Existing

:Scheduled Installation(Phase IV)

:Not installed

PMRCIP Phase II PMRCIP Phase III

PM

RC

IP P

ha

se I

VP

MR

CIP

P

ha

se V

14

1) Hydraulic Systems in Pasig-Marikina River basin and Laguna de Bay

An integrated study of the Pasig-Marikina River basin and Laguna de Bay is required.

Parañaque Spillway

MCGS

Napindan gate

Rosario Weir

Taytay gate

Cainta gate

■River Channel Network

【Downstream channel Network from

Rosario point】- Phase II river channel

- Phase III river channel

- Diversion/ Discharge System

- MCGS

- Rosario weir

- Manggahan Floodway

- Cainta gate

- Taytay gate

- Napindan control gate

- Parañaque Spillway

【Upstream Channel Network from

Rosario point】- Phase IV river channel

- Phase V river channel

※Bold characters already exist

2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River

■Flood Storage Facility

- Marikina dam and Retarding Basin

A-35

Page 37: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Manila

Bay

Pasig-Marikina

River Basin

Ration of inflow volume of A)、B)、C) 1/100 return period

15

2) Three (3) Types of Lake Water Discharged from Parañaque Spillway

■Rainfall Runoff to Lakeshore basin

Water A):Precipitation directly on the surface of

Laguna de Bay

Water B): Inflow from lakeshore area of Laguna

de Bay (21 river basins)

■Flowing from Other Basins

Water C): Water released from Pasig-Marikina

river basin to Laguna de Bay via

Manggahan floodway

Water C) through Manggahan

Floodway can contribute to mitigate

flood damage in Pasig-Marikina River

Basin

The benefits created by the release of the

Parañaque spillway are the sum of the

benefits created by each of the above A), B)

and C).

Item Water A) Water B) Water C)

Inflow Volume(MCM) 565 1,392 258

Ratio 25.5% 62.9% 11.7%

Ratio of water volume A), B), C) from July 29 to August 16 in

100-year Laguna Lake water level forecast results

C) Inflow from Pasig-Marikina river basin via

Manggahan Floodway:11.7%Water C)

B) Laguna de Bay Lakeshore

Basin:62.9%

(21 River Basins)

Water B)

B)

B)

B)

A) Precipitation on the surface:25.5%

Water A)

2.2.3 Consideration of the Contribution of Parañaque Spillway to Mitigate Flood Damage in Pasig-Marikina River

16

1) Economic Evaluation Results

Parañaque

Spillway

Route※1

Project

Cost

emillion

PHP)

NPV of B※2 emillion PHP)

NPV of C

emillion PHP)EIRR B/CPasig-

Marikina

Basin

Laguna

Lake

Shore

Total

Route-1 75,959 47,953 21,651 69,586 26,013 18.9% 2.68

Revised

Route-2-A68,376 58,774 27,427 86,201 27,444 23.1% 3.14

Revised

Route-2-B67,771 58,363 27,427 85,790 27,397 23.1% 3.13

Route-3 84,454 51,968 21,651 73,619 29,030 18.6% 2.54

※1: Detail study of routes shall be executed in Feasibility Study

※2: Additional economic benefit items (household business suspension, fishery damage) were included

.

Table 2-2-3 Economic Evaluation Results (Diameter of Parañaque Spillway is 13m and Tunneling Method is Shield)

2.2.3 Result of Economic Evaluation of Parañaque Spillway

In this 2020 follow-up study, EIRR was 18.6% to 23.1% as a result of reviewing the

“Climate change adaptation”, “operation level and route”, “benefit generation

area” and “additional economic benefit” of the Parañaque Spillway.

A-36

Page 38: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

17

2.3 Improvement Effects other than Economic Evaluation

• At the time of the 1/100 probable flood, Laguna lakeshore area had a 20cm

water level rise due to inflow from Manggahan Floodway (planned maximum

discharge 2,400m3/s), but Parañaque Spillway (Diameter=13.0m,maximum

discharge 240m3/s) eliminates this impact and has the effect of lowering the

water level by 50cm (total 70cm decline).

CaseParañaque

Spillway

Manggahan

Floodway

WL(m)

100yr flood

Initial ―without PSW

―without MFW

14.3

Current ―without PSW

✔With MFW

14.5

With the Project ✔with PSW

✔With MFW

13.8

50cm

decline

:Inflow from Pasig-Marikina River basin though Manggahan Floodway

EL.12.5m (PD No. 813)

EL.13.8m eproposed DFL)

EL.14.5m (100-yr flood level)

Public Land responsible by LLDA

(RA 4850 and PD 813)

70cm decline

EL.14.3m (100-yr flood level exclude without Manggahan Flood way)

Notes:

• Lake water level of El. 12.50m is average

annual maximum lake level (based on the

RA No. 4850 and PD No. 813)

70cm*1

decline

EL.15.0m

Lakeshore Dike*2

*2:Lakeshore Diking System is formulated in the comprehensive

flood management plan for Laguna de Bay lakeshore area.

*1:Storage space of Laguna de

Bay will be secured by pre-

discharge through the

Paranaque spillway prior to

the water level raising period

and the water level can be

lowered by 90cm.

2.3 Improvement Effects other than Economic Evaluation

Table 2-3-1 Probable Lake Water Level (D=13m)

○Parañaque Spillway shortens the inundation period of 12.5 m or more by about 2 months and reduces

economic and social damage. ※Reduced from 142 days to 75 days

Return periodExisting

Condition

Without project

Climate Change

RCP4.5

With PSW

Climate Change

RCP4.5

200 14.7 14.9 14.1

100 14.3 14.5 13.8

50 14.0 14.2 13.6

30 13.7 13.9 13.3

20 13.6 13.8 13.2

10 13.2 13.4 12.9

5 12.9 13.1 12.8

3 12.6 12.8 12.6

2 12.3 12.5 12.3

18

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

14.5

15.0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Dis

cha

rge

of

Pa

ran

aq

ue

Sp

illw

ay

(m3

/s)

Lake

Wa

ter

Leve

l(m

)

Return Period 100-year Existing Condition RCP4.5_without PSW

RCP4.5_withPSW RCP4.5_PSW_Discharge

:12.5m or more flooded

Without PSW

Maximum Level 14.5m(100-yr flood)

With PSW

Maximum Level 13.8m( 100-yr flood )

After 2 months later

No flooding

damage

Flood for about 2

months after this

Without PSW Maximum Level:13.8m

(Flood Area:66.1km2

Affected people513,000)

With PSW Maximum Level 12.5m

(Flood Area:0km2

Affected people zero)

Junior High

school

University

Elementary

school

Muntinlupa

Alaban

Muntinlupa

Alaban

※Include Climate Change

Elementary

school

Junior High

school

University

Elementary

school

Elementary

school

Junior High

school

University

Elementary

school

Muntinlupa

Alaban

Elementary

school

Junior High

school

University

Elementary

school

Muntinlupa

Alaban

Elementary

school

Operation level:12.0m

Operation level:11.5m

14.5m → 13.8m0.7m decline

Parañaque Spillway

discharge

2 months

shortening

A-37

Page 39: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2009

Inu

nd

ati

on

da

ys

without PSW with PSW

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

9.0

9.5

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Dis

cha

rge

(m

3/s

)

Lake

Su

rfa

ce L

eve

l (m

)

2009 SML WL_without PSW SML WL_with PSW

PSW_Operation Level PFW-W 10.00

19

2.3 Improvement Effects Exclusive of Economic Evaluation

13.2m

13.8m

60cm Decline

Operation

Level:11.5m Operation Level:12.0m

Parañaque Spillway

discharge

78 days reduction

110 days

38 days

○Parañaque Spillway can shorten the inundation period of 12.5 m or more by about 2 months and

reduces economic and social damage in 2009 Typhoon Ondoy.

:12.5m or more flooded

2009.11.10 WL=13.5 m

Without Parañaque Spillway

2009.9.28 WL=13.8 m

Without Parañaque Spillway

Binan

San

Pedoro

Without Parañaque Spillway

2009.9.28 WL=13.2 m

With Parañaque Spillway

With Parañaque Spillway

2009.11.10 WL=12.5 mWith Parañaque Spillway

No flooding

Flooding untilmiddle ofDecember

Effect of Shortening Flooding Period

The maximum lake water level will be decline from 13.8m

to 13.2 (0.6m decline) with Parañaque Spillway.

Inundation period (days) will be shorten 78 days (without

PSW:110 days, with PSW:38 days)

After 44 days

After 44 days

20

2.3 Improvement Effects Exclusive of Economic Evaluation

Calamba

Laguna de BaySan Pedro

Laguna de Bay

:Inundation Area EL.13.8 (without PSW)

:Inundation Area EL.13.2 (with PSW)

Typhoon Ondoy 2009.9.28

Elementary

school

Barangay

Hall

Cabuyao City

Laguna de Bay

:Inundation Area EL.13.8 (without PSW)

:Inundation Area EL.13.2 (with PSW)

Typhoon Ondoy 2009.9.28

Elementary

school

High school

Residential Area

○In the case of Typhoon Ondoy, there are some

areas where the Parañaque spillway can eliminate

flood damage.

Inundation

elimination

area

Inundation

elimination

area

Inundation

elimination area

A-38

Page 40: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

21

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

• Parañaque Spillway will contribute to reduce the inundation depth and shorten the inundation period

on the lakeshore area, but it will not eliminate inundation damage.

• Also, if the Lakeshore Diking System is constructed (Phase I to Phase III), flooding in the constructed

section will be zero, but inundation damage will occur on the east side of Laguna de Bay.

• Therefore, it is necessary to take measures not only for structural measures (hard measures) but also

for non-structural measures (soft measures) in order to protect human lives and minimize inundation

damage.

After Construction of Parañaque Spillway

100-yr flood WL:13.8m

Laguna de Bay

:flooding area

West

Manggahan

Lakeshore Dike

Parañaque spillway will

contribute to reduce the

depth of inundation on

the lakeshore area,

shorten the period of

inundation, and prevent

inundation in some areas,

but will not eliminate

inundation damage in

the entire area.

After Construction of Parañaque Spillway

and Lakeshore Diking System

100-yr flood WL: 13.8m

ラグナ湖

Phase I

Phase II

Phase III

Inundation damage on the

west side of Laguna de Bay

will be zero

:flooding area

Laguna de Bay

Inundation damage

occurs on the east

side of Laguna de Bay

22

CategoryStractural

Measures

Non-stractural

MeasuresAllowable Area Allowable Level

Priority Project Paranaque

Spillway

Strengthen early

warning system,

create /

share flooded

area map, etc.

All areas are

covered except the

West Mangahan

lakeshore dike Area

Since lake water level with 100-year

return period will be 13.8 m, housing,

offices, schools, etc. less than 13.8 m

will be inundated by up to 1.3 m.

The maximum flooding period for a

100-year flood is 1.2 months (1.2

months of flooding at an altitude of

12.5 m).

Comprehensive

Flood Control

Plan eDraft)

Paranaque

Spillway

Strengthen early

warning system,

create /

share flooded

area map, etc.

Areas where the

lake bank system is

not implemented

Target LGUs are

shown in Chapter 4

(4.6.3), 6th

prioritize area and

7th prioritize area.

In West Mangahan area and

lakeshore diking system

implemented area (Phase1 to

Phase3), inundation damage will be

zero until 100-year flood due to the

effect of Paranaque spillway and

lakeshore diking system.

As shown in the priority project

category, the east side of Laguna de

Bay, where lakeshore diking system is

not implemanted, has a maximum

flooding period of approximately 1.2

months and a maximum flooding

depth of 1.3 m during a 100-year

flood.

Lakeshore Dikng

System

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

A-39

Page 41: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

23

• After construction of Parañaque Spillway, people affected by inundation can be mitigated from 930,000

to 513,000 (about 55%) and continuously after construction of Lakeshore Diking System (Phase I, II, III)

people affected by inundation can be mitigated from 513,000 to 107,000 (about 12%).

Figure 2-3-1 Analysis Results of Effect of Parañaque Spillway (D=13m)

and Lakeshore Diking System (100-year, Including Climate Change)

853,000(98.6 km2)

After Construction of Parañaque Spillway

⇒ 340,000 peoples (No inundation)

After Construction of Lakeshore Diking System

⇒ 406,000 peoples (No inundation)

513,000(66.1 km2)

107,000(26.7 km2)

Build-up Area : 3.9 km2

Agricultural Area : 19.6 km2

Swamp, etc. : 3.2 km2

24

EL.12.5m (PD No. 813)

EL.13.8m eproposed DFL)

EL.14.5m (100-yr flood level)

Public Land responsible by LLDA (RA 4850 and PD 813)

Proposed Lake Management Area including Lakeshore Management

70cm decline

Easement Zone

(PD No. 1067)

Lakeshore Dike*

Notes:

• Lake water level of El. 12.50m is average annual maximum lake level (based on the RA No. 4850 and PD No. 813)

• Easement zone: 3 m for urban area and 20 m for agricultural area (based on the PD No. 1067: Water Code)

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

Non-structural MeasuresI. Lakeshore Management

• RA No. 4850 (1966) and PD No. 813 state that Laguna Lake below El. 12.50m is public land for

management by LLDA.

II. Proposal of Establishing Lakeshore Management System

• Set the lakeshore dike elevation : El. 13.8m + free board (1.2m)

• Set easement zones from the Lakeshore bank (3m for urban area, 20m for agricultural area etc.)

• Manage between the easement zone to the other side of the Lake

• Lakeshore management is to be conducted by LLDA under cooperation by LGUs and the related

agencies (DPWH, DENR, DA etc.).

*Lakeshore Diking System is formulated in the comprehensive

flood management plan for Laguna de Bay lakeshore area.

A-40

Page 42: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

25

2.4 Inundation Allowable Area / Level

Laguna de Bay

Manila Bay

After Construction Parañaque Spillway

100-yr Flood WL:13.8m

Elementary

School

University

High School

Muntinlupa

Technical Institute

①Non-structural measures for the

operation of Parañaque spillway

esoft measures)

Water level observation related to

the operation of Parañaque

spillway

Issuance of warnings regarding the

operation of Parañaque spillway

Construction of an information

network on the operation of the

Parañaque spillway

② Non-structural measures for raising

Laguna lake water level

Lake level observation

Issuing a warning about the rising Laguna

Lake water level

Construction of information network

Create and hazard map and share

Information

Sharing

1.3m

Sign of flooding depth

Flood-related sign installation image

Drainage facilities

and drainage river

Drainage facilities

and inflow river

Warning System for Lake Level Rise eexisting)

Radio wave

level gauge

Solar

receiving

instrument

• Warning system

installed in 'Sucat

People's Park' in Sucat,

Muntinlupa.

• According to an on-site

interview survey, it is

managed by the city and

installed last year (2019),

and a warning is issued

when Laguna Lake water

level rises.Source:Study Team(2020/02/13)

Even after the Parañaque Spillway, the early warning system will

be strengthened as a non-structural measure, and inundation

area maps will be created and shared.

Elementary School

2.5 Comprehensive Flood Management Plan in Conservation and Sustainable Development of Laguna de Bay

- Laguna de Bay is variously utilized for irrigation water, hydropower

generation, industrial water, resource of domestic water supply.

Moreover, the lake is used for inland fishery, water transport etc.

- Due to expansion of Metro Manila, rapid increase in population and

development in the lakeshore area causes the issues such as the

decrease in lake water quality and increase in flood damage, etc.

- LLDA has updated a Master Plan in 1995; Master Plan: 2016 and

beyond. In the updated Master Plan, the vulnerability of flood

hazards and related health and economic risks is prioritized as the

most critical for Laguna basin administrative authorities.

- Comprehensive Flood Management Plan including Parañaque Spillway

meets the above and is positioned as the most important innovation

to support safety and stability in people’s life and economic activities

along the lakeshore area. Moreover, the Master Plan can mitigate

flood inundation in center of Metro Manila in combined operation

with existing Mangahan Floodway.

- Increase in damages by natural disasters caused by climate change is a

serious issue in order to aim the sustainable development. Parañaque

Spillway is also very effective on the mitigation of increase in lake

water level caused by climate change, resulting in reduction of flood

damage.

Rapid Population Growth

Source : LLDA

Master Plan: 2016 and beyond

Inland Fishery

26

A-41

Page 43: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 2

Materials Related to Economic Analysis

A-42

Page 44: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 2-1 List of LGUs Subject to Flood Damage Analysis

ID Province Name of LGUPopulation

(2015 census)Increase Rate

(2015-20)Population in

2020

1 NCR CITY OF MUNTINLUPA 504,509 0.98% 529,719

2 NCR TAGUIG 804,915 0.98% 845,136

3 LAGUNA BAY 62,143 1.85% 68,108

4 LAGUNA BINAN 333,028 1.85% 364,994

5 LAGUNA CABUYAO 308,745 1.85% 338,380

6 LAGUNA CALAUAN 80,453 1.85% 88,175

7 LAGUNA CITY OF CALAMBA 454,486 1.85% 498,110

8 LAGUNA FAMY 16,587 1.85% 18,179

9 LAGUNA KALAYAAN 23,269 1.85% 25,503

10 LAGUNA LOS BANOS 112,008 1.85% 122,759

11 LAGUNA LUMBAN 30,652 1.85% 33,594

12 LAGUNA MABITAC 20,530 1.85% 22,501

13 LAGUNA PAETE 25,096 1.85% 27,505

14 LAGUNA PAGSANJAN 42,164 1.85% 46,211

15 LAGUNA PAKIL 20,659 1.85% 22,642

16 LAGUNA PANGIL 24,274 1.85% 26,604

17 LAGUNA PILA 50,289 1.85% 55,116

18 LAGUNA SAN PEDRO 325,809 1.85% 357,082

19 LAGUNA SANTA CRUZ (Capital) 117,605 1.85% 128,893

20 LAGUNA SANTA ROSA 353,767 1.85% 387,724

21 LAGUNA SINILOAN 38,067 1.85% 41,721

22 LAGUNA VICTORIA 39,321 1.85% 43,095

23 RIZAL ANGONO 113,283 2.08% 125,565

24 RIZAL BARAS 69,300 2.08% 76,813

25 RIZAL JALA-JALA 32,254 2.08% 35,751

26 RIZAL MORONG 58,118 2.08% 64,419

27 RIZAL PILILLA 64,812 2.08% 71,839

28 RIZAL TANAY 117,830 2.08% 130,605

29 RIZAL TAYTAY 319,104 2.08% 353,700

30 RIZAL CARDONA 49,034 2.08% 54,350

31 RIZAL BINANGONAN 282,474 2.08% 313,099

Total 4,894,585 5,317,892

A-43

Page 45: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

A-44

Page 46: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 2-2 Damage to House and Household Goods by Height (PHP)

Eco

nom

ic D

ama

ge o

f Ho

useh

old

Bui

ldin

g a

nd A

sset

(inc.

indi

rect

)1

23

45

67

89

1011

1213

Met

roM

anila

Met

roM

anila

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

na

Tagu

ig C

ityM

untin

lupa

City

San

Ped

roB

inan

San

ta R

osa

Cab

uyao

City

of

Cal

amba

Los

Ban

os

Bay

Cal

auan

Vic

toria

Pila

San

ta C

ruz

<=

12

.50

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

<=

12

.61

83

,605

18

,232

11

8,34

04

7,03

49

,93

98

,29

32

,93

34

1,9

60

6,0

57

10

,35

03,

96

95,

80

67,

59

40

7,0

25

1,6

94

22

,66

9

<=

12

.73

99

,935

82

,651

23

1,08

68

6,19

85

4,0

28

28

,62

39

,14

87

3,9

11

18

,02

62

4,5

19

10

,37

96,

35

11

6,4

14

016

,75

15

,05

23

3,6

03

<=

12

.81

,08

2,3

051

55

,419

67

8,29

62

48,

589

10

0,7

86

54

,63

32

2,6

86

22

4,4

14

46

,79

66

3,7

68

24

,35

92

5,1

54

42,

02

62

35

44,2

29

9,8

28

117

,31

8

<=

12

.91

,86

5,0

283

59

,173

1,1

10,

917

39

4,93

72

32

,23

71

26

,93

74

4,1

67

34

9,9

03

93

,64

91

17

,15

35

1,1

81

33,

14

37

1,8

22

27

373

,54

621

,49

716

3,6

14

<=

13

.02

,70

7,1

264

87

,819

1,6

47,

919

57

1,38

83

18

,23

51

69

,58

47

2,3

71

49

4,5

05

13

9,7

58

19

0,8

96

68

,98

44

5,6

05

95,

67

61,

07

51

05,3

86

28,9

54

244

,78

2

<=

13

.13

,97

0,4

186

69

,932

2,4

42,

148

85

8,33

84

07

,83

12

62

,10

11

13

,50

57

32

,96

32

08

,37

92

76

,15

51

20,

83

68

0,4

23

13

7,5

53

1,3

45

139

,64

144

,87

636

3,1

04

<=

13

.25

,52

0,0

931

,06

5,5

313

,27

1,72

31

,18

2,83

86

54

,81

34

10

,71

81

86

,69

89

28

,36

52

70

,71

74

37

,35

61

63,

26

89

1,1

06

17

8,8

11

1,8

65

183

,54

571

,40

644

1,8

11

<=

13

.36

,97

4,8

261

,26

9,9

474

,18

7,95

81

,51

6,92

17

63

,93

25

06

,01

52

76

,16

61,

14

7,6

44

34

4,2

19

53

7,1

68

23

6,7

661

25,

21

92

12,

02

12,

80

72

30,1

70

89,0

85

570

,34

1

<=

13

.48

,67

0,0

911

,68

0,4

475

,10

8,61

11

,88

1,03

31

,02

8,5

94

65

1,8

52

38

9,3

32

1,3

69

,76

44

05

,34

46

75

,10

72

97,

90

31

55,

79

12

36,

05

92,

88

72

58,4

67

111

,88

367

2,0

74

<=

13

.51

0,3

27

,108

2,0

12

,021

6,0

45,

054

2,2

70,

032 1

,18

3,5

17

82

8,5

04

49

4,7

50

1,5

60

,19

04

67

,65

18

45

,69

93

88,

83

91

95,

49

82

62,

21

33,

32

22

93,6

46

146

,66

774

8,9

21

<=

13

.61

3,0

22

,914

2,4

27

,081

7,6

50,

938

2,9

44,

895 1

,38

4,9

87

1,0

42

,09

46

52

,92

71,

93

7,8

89

57

6,4

30

1,0

50

,47

65

07,

63

62

57,

20

33

22,

28

43,

69

23

68,7

04

193

,62

597

3,7

24

<=

13

.71

5,9

93

,692

3,2

88

,700

9,1

64,

897

3,5

40,

0951

,92

6,7

16

1,3

61

,98

48

02

,95

52,

32

9,9

31

70

4,9

66

1,2

59

,63

26

17,

47

82

90,

43

43

86,

97

53,

69

24

40,5

43

246

,45

91

,102

,02

4

<=

13

.81

8,8

98

,502

3,7

59

,754

10

,97

8,6

604

,16

0,08

72,1

52

,67

21

,60

7,0

82

97

0,2

90

2,7

49

,70

58

65

,43

71,

47

8,1

47

75

1,4

53

35

3,5

11

43

5,5

17

4,9

30

519

,65

43

02,1

75

1,3

27,3

80

<=

13

.92

1,9

51

,015

4,3

81

,561

12

,71

8,2

864

,85

1,16

82,4

41

,37

51

,94

0,1

87

1,1

36

,31

73,

13

6,8

00

1,0

59

,13

61,

70

1,

17

79

09,

18

64

12,

45

24

86,

81

55,

48

65

80,0

66

367

,36

41

,492

,48

8

<=

14

.02

5,3

82

,625

5,1

42

,737

14

,64

2,6

475

,59

7,24

12,8

31

,00

72

,31

1,7

31

1,3

38

,65

23,

47

6,0

56

1,2

32

,83

22,

04

0,

69

91

,03

8,4

46

47

1,0

53

55

4,3

42

7,2

24

631

,89

44

58,1

69

1,6

51,

92

9

<=

14

.12

8,8

92

,603

5,7

89

,432

16

,68

4,4

836

,41

8,68

93,0

81

,99

92

,70

7,4

33

1,5

73

,80

53,

84

6,8

83

1,4

63

,67

82,

27

9,

86

71

,26

1,9

60

52

2,0

14

61

6,2

91

9,4

71

702

,35

45

36,0

74

1,8

50,

60

6

<=

14

.23

2,5

81

,887

6,7

83

,904

18

,64

4,6

577

,15

3,32

63,6

53

,37

83

,13

0,5

26

1,8

48

,31

04,

25

7,6

69

1,6

75

,83

02,

53

4,

02

71

,44

5,6

49

57

0,0

29

65

7,5

54

12,0

79

757

,27

85

98,2

41

2,0

09,3

34

<=

14

.33

5,9

98

,748

7,3

85

,225

20

,63

9,5

917

,97

3,93

2 3,9

02

,16

53

,48

3,0

59

2,1

26

,55

24,

53

0,5

41

1,8

85

,15

92,

74

7,

17

51

,70

6,4

86

66

4,2

40

70

0,3

95

13,8

47

807

,36

36

83,4

39

2,1

71,3

86

<=

14

.43

9,5

64

,092

8,1

52

,651

22

,55

8,7

928

,85

2,64

9 4,2

74

,85

63

,87

7,7

95

2,3

95

,01

14,

74

5,6

61

2,0

96

,66

72,

99

8,

28

11

,95

7,6

42

71

6,9

91

74

4,0

67

19,0

34

873

,91

87

56,1

66

2,3

25,8

64

<=

14

.54

3,3

14

,065

9,1

88

,915

24

,50

1,7

399

,62

3,41

2 4,8

06

,00

64

,38

2,9

08

2,6

19

,55

55,

06

1,1

70

2,3

46

,52

23,

21

2,

19

92

,21

5,4

82

78

2,4

23

81

5,4

77

25,6

60

910

,60

08

29,8

34

2,4

40,2

06

<=

14

.64

8,8

70

,572

10

,18

3,3

732

7,7

63

,740

10

,92

3,46

0 5,1

89

,56

04

,99

3,8

13

2,8

64

,18

05,

79

6,9

94

2,7

08

,96

13,

56

1,

53

82

,49

6,0

92

89

5,4

15

95

1,0

00

34,8

68

1,0

28,7

54

930

,06

42

,860

,20

2

<=

14

.75

4,6

54

,565

11

,79

7,9

473

0,7

20

,921

12

,13

5,69

7 6,1

16

,55

75

,68

1,3

89

3,1

42

,18

86,

44

4,7

75

3,0

83

,24

63,

86

9,

36

02

,78

3,0

92

93

1,0

30

1,1

06,

60

949

,42

61

,188

,66

11

,038

,86

43

,092

,63

6

Ele

vati

on

Ran

ge

Tota

lM

etr

o M

anil

aLa

gun

aR

izal

1415

1617

1819

2021

2223

2425

2627

2829

3031

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Pag

sanj

anLu

mba

nK

alay

aan

Pae

teP

akil

Pan

gil

Sin

iloan

Fam

yM

abita

cJa

laja

laP

ililia

Tana

yB

aras

Mo

rong

Car

dona

Bin

ango

nan

Ang

ono

Tayt

ay

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

454

1,0

090

4,4

77

16

91,

89

30

028

03

58

33

48,

362

1,6

7731

82

,26

31

3,3

98

4,6

25

15,

698

645

2,7

750

7,7

91

79

41,

89

386

02

,94

95

,32

03

,14

71

5,4

502

,387

2,9

59

2,7

47

16

,94

28,

14

92

9,0

98

1,7

986

,622

02

7,1

98

3,0

58

8,7

45

4,8

351

,25

73

,96

97

,94

76

,30

44

3,4

277

,241

5,4

60

9,0

46

61

,03

12

5,7

19

82,

415

3,6

6113

,728

03

7,3

79

5,2

50

9,8

74

5,2

431

,31

11

4,5

23

22

,97

31

3,9

48

65,

494

9,7

9013

,62

11

2,3

92

93

,24

43

8,5

83

12

4,8

92

3,6

6120

,096

227

65

,53

49

,90

91

6,4

37

21,

320

5,1

66

17

,57

82

8,

28

82

2,5

34

10

5,3

2714

,600

19,7

67

14

,30

41

23

,25

66

8,7

20

17

4,5

92

8,5

6832

,251

500

85

,93

21

5,4

86

23,

32

12

4,0

265

,51

92

7,7

66

36

,96

42

5,2

78

13

7,8

7320

,718

26,0

18

26

,66

12

19

,91

41

03,

01

02

61,

901

9,5

7154

,991

1,4

55

118

,83

41

7,5

17

27,

34

93

9,9

717

,67

33

9,4

15

51

,43

34

0,0

80

22

0,7

4232

,529

41,3

92

30

,47

92

49

,11

41

62,

58

53

54,

485

12,

073

70,3

922

,14

615

6,7

55

31

,19

53

4,8

05

56,

396

11,6

15

40

,97

36

6,0

83

48

,81

52

56,

616

36,7

0253

,95

83

7,9

84

31

1,4

90

22

4,0

63

48

1,2

10

16,

857

112

,027

3,1

07

181

,34

03

4,7

15

43,

58

47

6,5

7013

,50

25

2,2

96

77

,02

65

6,5

28

30

3,9

4548

,626

72,4

04

48

,77

24

01

,22

62

78

,36

05

94,

146

21,

035

134

,210

3,5

89

214

,79

33

5,8

23

56,

95

19

4,4

9417

,26

05

9,5

00

96

,56

26

8,8

26

38

3,3

4959

,111

89,4

88

54

,01

84

69

,82

13

55

,38

36

93,

472

25,

369

174

,885

4,1

68

268

,31

34

5,6

90

81,

73

01

18,

479

19,5

03

68

,21

31

08

,55

17

8,8

03

47

9,6

1585

,196

104

,20

27

8,3

79

61

0,1

094

53,

69

59

46,

346

30,

354

228

,878

4,9

71

317

,49

45

0,4

76

90,

15

41

51,

139

22,8

97

83

,44

31

41

,43

31

05

,37

85

61,

060

95,9

711

39,0

14

92

,25

47

07

,59

05

40,

00

91,

15

7,3

87

35,

824

278

,360

5,1

46

382

,69

76

2,8

60

11

6,0

37

21

8,7

8532

,70

68

8,0

49

17

4,5

64

13

0,6

89

65

6,5

011

10,9

481

66,1

50

103

,32

98

45

,30

36

34,

95

61,

33

7,6

49

46,

832

341

,832

5,1

46

415

,35

06

9,1

18

13

9,5

70

25

7,4

9238

,36

711

7,2

92

19

8,6

17

15

3,7

15

73

5,0

191

34,0

231

90,7

21

128

,46

31

,0

59

,67

77

22,

83

71,

52

8,0

96

56,

334

414

,194

6,9

87

477

,50

37

4,2

29

16

1,6

30

37

4,7

3445

,71

013

0,0

28

22

4,2

75

18

3,5

22

89

8,7

671

63,0

822

15,1

17

142

,18

91

,1

55

,98

28

60,

42

21,

75

3,8

85

61,

770

488

,071

10

,05

052

5,3

66

10

0,7

49

18

6,8

28

45

9,6

7651

,16

813

7,8

03

25

0,1

87

22

2,1

72

97

4,6

321

82,5

552

36,1

18

166

,74

61,2

95

,01

61

,02

9,9

09

2,0

61,

352

72,

999

604

,570

13

,86

456

8,7

00

10

8,8

13

20

1,1

31

50

9,1

0259

,23

414

0,2

45

27

1,2

32

24

8,4

41

1,0

64,

852

203

,820

284

,22

318

4,8

87

1,4

47

,09

31

,12

7,4

35

2,3

21,

342

88,

665

684

,728

21

,02

261

8,4

71

12

0,6

65

25

1,6

62

60

1,2

4767

,31

014

9,2

39

33

4,7

98

29

7,0

74

1,1

82,

590

233

,674

323

,50

220

5,3

65

1,6

18

,72

71

,22

8,0

69

2,5

50,

134

94,

002

777

,992

26

,74

964

7,4

47

13

7,6

80

30

8,3

84

68

5,2

2179

,22

417

2,7

92

35

7,8

68

33

3,6

29

1,2

73,

655

279

,146

351

,05

423

1,4

10

1,7

85

,77

11

,36

3,0

53

2,8

77,

063

10

8,0

698

62,4

463

6,7

21

680

,15

21

46

,68

63

62,

74

07

74,

364

88,

789

182

,64

63

72

,87

03

68

,63

01,

33

9,4

102

90,0

903

98,4

23

255

,0

18

1,9

64

,55

11

,47

0,4

53

3,1

63,

966

12

5,3

559

55,0

004

8,4

53

774

,00

91

62

,41

14

38,

65

38

32,

717

96,

282

202

,79

04

00

,19

14

20

,76

21,

52

2,3

043

43,1

364

31,6

98

300

,3

52

2,2

86

,35

51

,60

0,7

91

3,6

17,

872

14

2,9

701,

050

,072

60

,69

284

9,7

19

18

9,4

09

47

0,3

56

86

7,5

651

09,2

70

250

,98

04

77

,02

05

15

,48

01,

66

8,7

493

70,9

115

04,3

07

32

7,7

99

2,5

47

,09

51

,70

5,9

38

4,0

18,

398

A-45

Page 47: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix Damage to House and Household Goods by Height (PHP)

Eco

nom

ic D

amag

e of

Indu

stor

ial A

sset

(in

c. in

dire

ct)1

23

45

67

89

1011

1213

Met

roM

anila

Met

roM

anila

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

na

Tagu

ig C

ityM

untin

lupa

City

San

Ped

roB

inan

San

ta R

osa

Cab

uyao

City

of

Cal

amba

Los

Ban

os

Bay

Cal

auan

Vic

toria

Pila

San

ta C

ruz

<=

12

.50

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

<=

12

.65

37

,09

52

3,3

62

34

0,1

38

17

3,5

94

442

22,9

2012

,351

71,3

6314

,068

40,8

9715

,770

18,

525

32,

225

01

8,38

88,

552

45,

737

<=

12

.71

,09

8,0

96

78

,40

56

82

,70

03

36

,99

12,

408

75,9

9735

,574

128

,176

34,9

2491

,992

33,2

842

1,84

27

2,46

60

43,

278

26,

349

76,

024

<=

12

.81

,83

9,3

32

93

,42

11

,22

6,7

79

51

9,1

32

3,39

390

,027

52,7

102

08,6

3064

,735

161

,813

52,8

884

4,11

210

8,71

781

57

0,99

83

0,15

615

4,63

4

<=

12

.92

,50

9,6

23

16

2,2

10

1,6

55

,65

36

91

,76

04,

388

157

,821

75,3

102

88,8

6495

,681

236

,392

84,1

286

3,21

71

48,

861

953

85,

230

46,

440

201,

983

<=

13

.03

,50

8,2

53

23

7,2

63

2,2

83

,72

39

87

,26

75,

842

231

,421

117

,005

356

,927

124

,687

416

,255

108

,431

68,

66

018

7,94

81,

707

106,

602

74,

522

254,

585

<=

13

.15

,05

4,2

86

33

3,8

01

3,2

04

,86

21

,51

5,6

23

7,18

63

26,6

151

93,5

915

04,4

301

69,6

595

59,6

041

63,6

7010

6,98

725

7,24

12,

303

146,

661

102,

615

348,

847

<=

13

.26

,63

3,3

95

47

4,1

63

4,1

35

,83

92

,02

3,3

93

12,

577

461

,586

297

,700

645

,660

205

,926

745

,379

208

,623

126

,73

031

5,71

22,

345

184,

955

139,

378

432,

957

<=

13

.38

,33

5,6

84

54

8,9

73

5,2

60

,39

32

,52

6,3

18

14,

305

534

,668

379

,137

790

,258

258

,395

947

,939

293

,790

189

,30

136

5,12

93,

213

233,

616

171,

708

552,

415

<=

13

.41

0,2

04

,87

46

86

,75

36

,40

5,2

61

3,1

12

,85

91

7,04

16

69,7

124

94,2

399

06,5

723

13,5

761

,199

,144

389

,464

23

6,03

341

0,72

33,

354

267,

410

228,

405

653,

016

<=

13

.51

2,3

27

,37

98

97

,81

87

,69

0,1

57

3,7

39

,40

42

0,69

58

77,1

225

94,7

161

,058

,528

369

,912

1,5

17,3

254

78,6

64

263,

580

472,

584

4,07

629

4,25

330

5,67

572

6,52

9

<=

13

.61

5,6

61

,76

31

,15

0,9

85

9,7

44

,99

04

,76

5,7

89

23,

427

1,1

27,5

587

52,7

801

,374

,176

468

,895

1,8

64,7

086

34,

676

335,

862

589,

804

4,67

736

8,30

642

5,68

091

3,97

7

<=

13

.71

8,8

57

,20

21

,44

6,3

71

11

,67

3,4

79

5,7

37

,35

33

2,45

31

,413

,917

949

,382

1,6

66,6

085

76,1

962

,206

,223

741

,8

1938

4,06

369

9,79

74,

677

451,

256

553,

423

1,06

5,09

1

<=

13

.82

2,5

40

,92

21

,61

9,3

93

14

,16

5,1

27

6,7

56

,40

13

6,74

91

,582

,645

1,1

28,4

831

,948

,088

694

,781

2,5

96,7

728

86

,041

498,

792

808,

126

6,40

953

3,76

269

4,96

81,

331,

516

<=

13

.92

6,4

81

,21

81

,95

3,6

83

16

,59

5,0

27

7,9

32

,50

84

2,05

41

,911

,629

1,3

35,9

092

,234

,256

848

,870

3,0

54,2

031

,0

81,9

5157

8,59

492

8,29

78,

166

607,

117

841,

971

1,56

4,21

3

<=

14

.03

0,9

54

,73

52

,39

8,9

86

19

,40

5,7

10

9,1

50

,03

94

9,05

42

,349

,932

1,5

72,3

732

,543

,036

1,0

00,0

963

,691

,4151

,247

,187

635,

919

1,06

2,30

11

1,93

067

2,79

81,

011,

622

1,77

8,07

5

<=

14

.13

5,3

42

,35

52

,78

6,7

46

22

,04

9,0

21

10

,50

6,5

87

52,

645

2,7

34,1

011

,852

,291

2,8

50,1

031

,158

,724

4,1

48,2

671,4

70,8

9070

5,12

91,

172,

766

14,

728

738,

410

1,18

8,69

12,

000,

822

<=

14

.23

9,4

06

,32

83

,14

8,4

16

24

,45

8,5

11

11

,79

9,4

01

62,

355

3,0

86,0

602

,151

,842

3,1

85,5

321

,288

,099

4,5

80,5

711,6

29,6

1278

5,85

51,

249,

833

18,

481

803,

256

1,33

7,70

22,

205,

991

<=

14

.34

3,8

39

,68

73

,48

1,4

89

27

,18

4,9

58

13

,17

3,2

39

67,

601

3,4

13,8

882

,430

,274

3,4

16,0

911

,423

,702

5,0

32,9

551,8

84,3

2691

8,39

51,

348,

295

21,

407

866,

829

1,53

9,36

92,

425,

526

<=

14

.44

8,6

85

,00

13

,86

1,4

06

30

,01

9,2

76

14

,80

4,3

20

74,

580

3,7

86,8

262

,741

,270

3,5

97,8

731

,591

,643

5,5

84,9

872,1

23,9

721

,002

,31

21,

424,

358

31,

620

943,

137

1,70

4,75

72,

684,

416

<=

14

.55

3,3

82

,63

64

,41

2,1

80

32

,83

7,2

74

16

,13

3,1

82

84,

197

4,3

27,9

833

,032

,250

3,9

16,4

191

,753

,768

6,0

50,0

202,3

42,8

211

,083

,17

11,

540,

075

47,

898

980,

144

1,87

6,16

92,

870,

428

<=

14

.65

8,9

42

,84

14

,92

1,5

18

36

,32

3,3

38

17

,69

7,9

85

89,

491

4,8

32,0

273

,321

,963

4,3

13,8

481

,977

,540

6,5

95,0

882,6

45,1

391

,182

,12

51,

690,

624

61,

203

1,05

7,06

82,

120,

5623,

210,

274

<=

14

.76

4,1

42

,49

55

,42

7,9

69

39

,45

4,0

25

19

,26

0,5

01

99,

310

5,3

28,6

593

,622

,833

4,7

09,0

582

,216

,450

7,0

29,2

002,8

64,4

571

,276

,00

71,

851,

314

80,

292

1,17

2,43

22,

351,

5663,

465,

430

Ele

vati

on

Ran

ge

Tota

lM

etr

o M

anil

aLa

gun

aR

izal

1415

1617

1819

2021

2223

2425

2627

2829

3031

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naLa

guna

Lagu

naR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Riz

alR

izal

Pag

sanj

anLu

mba

nK

alay

aan

Pae

teP

akil

Pan

gil

Sin

iloan

Fam

yM

abita

cJa

laja

laP

ililia

Tana

yB

aras

Mo

rong

Car

dona

Bin

ango

nan

Ang

ono

Tayt

ay

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

2,5

33

1,9

560

50,2

88

2,7

663

,36

20

01

,35

81,

553

3,1

93

20

,43

22

,828

3,8

63

13,

020

28,1

07

22

,24

77

8,3

52

3,2

38

5,7

210

88,0

92

6,2

473

,36

25

,95

30

6,1

77

12,

375

26,2

41

36

,10

53,

891

23,0

86

14,

409

37,6

66

38

,00

51

45,

213

3,4

01

8,3

290

179

,43

72

6,0

588

,88

54

1,0

98

1,58

27

,78

11

5,4

6154

,09

35

3,3

31

4,9

5536

,73

11

8,7

2957

,50

86

5,9

71

21

2,3

52

11,4

65

18

,096

02

02,1

58

27,

885

10,7

82

43

,90

01,

655

12,6

55

23

,788

67,4

26

61

,54

36,

989

56,1

60

28,

488

101

,41

08

2,8

09

26

3,1

47

11,4

73

25

,583

1,10

12

91,4

28

29,

175

14,5

16

75

,62

22,

571

14,9

25

28,

067

97,2

82

117

,83

31

2,5

0678

,69

82

9,5

661

17,6

87

144

,18

03

61,

448

19,5

39

39

,917

2,30

24

10,0

18

53,

028

18,0

53

86

,93

12,

845

16,6

21

38,

167

105

,73

515

3,1

58

17,

179

103

,88

86

3,4

401

80,6

33

224

,47

26

28,

951

23,1

22

54

,318

4,21

15

09,3

96

59,

991

20,5

71

133

,490

3,50

021

,8

73

53,

704

143

,75

619

8,2

10

23,

026

152

,00

57

4,3

122

25,8

75

299

,97

88

52,

527

28,9

56

73

,212

4,28

66

43,7

76

82,

510

29,4

06

183

,564

6,05

523

,7

26

72,

251

195

,04

024

5,8

60

25,

801

192

,46

68

2,7

812

94,3

68

385

,50

31

,03

2,2

49

40,8

68

110

,622

4,40

07

23,4

33

90,

555

42,2

16

254

,605

6,89

129

,73

48

2,3

142

25,0

17

287

,50

33

8,0

692

33,3

58

99,

649

393

,12

44

61

,87

71

,29

1,9

48

45,2

63

140

,233

5,52

18

63,6

47

90,

636

55,1

52

363

,221

8,45

232

,19

19

0,7

102

70,0

91

362

,82

94

4,6

682

72,0

38

109

,903

459

,20

658

5,0

26

1,5

44,

934

56,5

55

196

,394

6,74

41,

072

,27

211

8,0

9769

,26

344

5,9

089,

168

37,0

46

106,

669

294

,81

044

9,9

42

56,

058

316

,85

616

2,4

926

05,1

10

745

,75

12

,02

8,1

03

69,2

35

244

,654

8,61

81,

257

,43

512

8,8

0774

,58

953

0,8

571

1,2

31

49,5

19

138,

995

377

,73

254

7,3

02

68,

223

400

,87

818

3,0

547

06

,23

686

7,7

42

2,4

47,

192

82,6

87

311

,114

9,47

61,

523

,30

017

7,9

2698

,48

076

3,6

201

6,7

17

54,0

67

171,

195

476

,83

165

5,6

52

79,

857

468

,46

020

7,7

118

37

,70

81,

027

,31

52

,83

1,6

71

107

,30

839

6,6

979,

476

1,6

24,9

58

194,

262

121

,51

897

0,2

951

9,4

28

67,5

39

196,

959

542

,09

072

7,4

25

99,

485

542

,85

824

5,7

141,0

30,5

21

1,24

1,9

62

3,3

05,

493

126

,63

550

1,5

361

2,83

81,

855

,20

019

7,3

801

48,1

54

1,24

2,0

47

22,

747

72,4

19

217,

543

635

,43

789

1,1

92

11

5,36

86

33,6

02

266

,666

1,1

39,3

62

1,45

5,6

80

3,7

95,

190

141

,36

161

1,6

742

0,84

02,

081

,62

124

6,4

671

73,8

42

1,37

0,3

43

24,

113

77,9

39

253,

191

681

,53

598

8,7

32

13

1,60

97

00,6

47

328

,826

1,3

13,7

60

1,65

5,8

72

4,4

52,

415

157

,16

971

2,8

502

8,65

72,

244

,77

425

9,5

161

89,9

09

1,51

7,6

27

29,

101

82,1

35

276,

899

744

,52

11,

113

,47

91

50,

540

793

,71

03

71

,131

1,4

79,4

56

1,82

4,6

72

5,0

44,

992

184

,68

185

1,8

023

4,40

42,

377

,84

527

4,1

902

43,2

55

1,78

7,5

88

34,

662

89,3

64

322,

634

830

,46

31,

262

,16

41

68,

702

906

,07

04

11

,187

1,6

59,2

86

2,02

5,6

88

5,5

87,

045

200

,66

398

7,2

043

8,78

52,

514

,02

531

1,9

722

98,6

28

2,09

3,4

82

40,

392

103

,77

834

0,2

339

08,0

18

1,37

1,8

79

20

1,96

89

81,4

634

37

,463

1,8

78,2

17

2,28

7,8

13

6,3

97,

265

247

,02

21,

122

,05

74

4,86

52,

654

,87

832

6,4

633

50,2

64

2,43

9,

44

84

3,75

01

15,3

66

363,

350

1,0

01,7

40

1,46

9,2

74

20

8,02

11,

082

,95

147

2,5

302

,065

,82

52,

480

,26

46

,98

9,2

26

281

,43

01,

274

,04

55

7,88

42,

910

,18

333

8,2

043

99,4

76

2,70

2,

90

84

6,26

01

37,5

17

391,

631

1,0

80,7

20

1,62

1,5

93

23

2,61

41,

163

,63

853

1,5

992

,327

,47

02,

670

,56

67

,67

8,1

55

317

,27

41,

409

,95

06

6,22

83,

109

,42

537

5,0

034

35,6

82

2,88

6,

65

35

3,71

91

61,0

53

440,

676

1,1

94,0

79

1,77

7,7

18

25

4,66

11,

277

,80

556

4,9

772

,560

,68

42,

805

,83

38

,38

4,0

67

A-46

Page 48: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 2-4 Number of Establishments by Sector

CF

GH

IJ

KL

PQ

RS

Tota

l

C -

Man

ufac

turin

gF

-C

ons

truct

ion

G -

Who

lesa

lean

d R

etai

lTr

ade;

Rep

air

of

Mo

tor

Veh

icle

s an

dM

oto

rcyc

les

H -

Tra

nspo

rtan

d S

tora

ge

I -

Acc

om

mo

dati

on

and

Foo

dS

ervi

ceA

ctiv

ities

J -

Info

rmat

ion

and

Co

mm

unic

ati

on

K -

Fin

anci

alan

d In

sura

nce

Act

iviti

es

L -

Rea

lE

stat

eA

ctiv

ities

P -

Edu

catio

n

Q -

Hum

anH

ealth

and

So

cial

Wo

rkA

ctiv

ities

R -

Arts

,E

nter

tain

men

t,

and

Rec

reat

ion

S -

Oth

erS

ervi

ceA

ctiv

ities

Tot

al

9,3

24

607

32,

645

793

10,4

31

4,1

384

,13

01,

888

2,0

092

,93

991

66,

217

76,0

37

Sh

are

12%

1%43

%1

%1

4%5

%5

%2%

3%

4%

1%8

%1

00%

NC

RM

akat

i City

1,0

18

186

4,9

5225

52,

214

798

1,4

10

882

324

666

121

1,1

5613

,98

2N

CR

Mun

tinlu

pa

City

444

622,

617

62

632

216

286

82

146

222

55

36

25

,18

6N

CR

Pas

ig C

ity1

,05

114

64,

467

126

1,18

95

1164

937

42

7042

413

97

5210

,09

8N

CR

Pat

ero

s11

45

211

775

414

72

194

41

960

644

NC

RT

agu

ig C

ity74

725

3,0

996

198

43

3532

210

01

8424

87

36

706

,84

8R

iza

lA

ngo

no17

94

700

420

278

46

22

337

62

31

361

,50

3R

iza

lB

ara

s5

11

168

050

236

36

74

2734

6R

iza

lC

ain

ta59

526

2,0

562

266

02

2813

53

11

2019

38

75

744

,72

7R

iza

lJa

laja

la2

60

880

3116

31

82

314

192

Riz

al

Mor

ong

98

12

381

7739

30

617

30

13

5360

3R

iza

lP

ililia

79

22

241

8029

51

513

58

3349

4R

iza

lT

ana

y18

43

849

622

068

70

78

326

02

31

191

,71

2R

iza

lT

ayta

y1

,13

639

2,0

092

156

02

6310

64

795

157

60

384

4,8

77

Riz

al

Car

don

a6

50

164

039

185

87

67

2634

5R

iza

lB

ina

ngo

nan

239

91,

232

731

71

297

32

606

22

01

682

,31

8La

gun

aB

ay10

05

342

010

649

10

320

13

638

692

Lagu

na

Bin

an

456

89

385

120

21

148

92

868

64

24

164

2,2

06

Lagu

na

Cab

uya

o39

415

1,5

024

130

82

027

65

91

038

12

72

393

,04

7La

gun

aC

ala

uan

39

01

541

3213

15

08

10

216

290

Lagu

na

City

of

Ca

lam

ba73

624

1,8

545

11,

095

233

215

51

139

146

74

364

4,9

82

Lagu

na

Fam

y5

032

07

01

01

00

34

9La

gun

aK

ala

yaa

n2

50

650

2310

10

21

55

137

Lagu

na

Los

Ba

nos

100

24

857

241

616

52

336

37

10

801

,14

7La

gun

aL

umba

n14

42

117

029

428

15

22

1736

9La

gun

aM

abita

c2

00

193

131

31

10

21

64

Lagu

na

Pae

te8

00

164

043

251

40

67

522

366

Lagu

na

Pag

sanj

an5

80

146

458

171

61

91

03

2234

4La

gun

aP

akil

28

048

029

124

03

83

914

4La

gun

aP

angi

l2

20

440

1519

20

30

04

109

Lagu

na

Pila

70

21

810

4527

83

102

13

2839

8La

gun

aS

an P

edro

455

181,

180

24

297

281

138

32

117

136

40

278

2,

996

Lagu

na

San

ta C

ruz

128

27

196

150

609

45

335

01

284

1,3

43

Lagu

na

San

ta R

osa

340

191,

061

31

347

130

143

28

100

123

37

260

2,6

19

Lagu

na

Sin

iloan

61

13

771

4124

28

05

27

531

601

Lagu

na

Vic

toria

37

01

430

2026

70

61

118

259

Pro

cinc

eLG

U

A-47

Page 49: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 2-5 Crop Area of Each Crop, Harvest Volume, Price

Note: Price of Sugarcane is converted from the price of sugar price Source : MAJOR CROPS STATISTICS OF THE PHILIPPINES, 2010-2014, PSA

FarmgatePrice (2017)

Production(ton)

Area (ha)Productio

n (ton)Area (ha)

Production (ton)

Area (ha) (PHP/kg)

Palay 18,967,826 4,739,672 130,904 30,619 27,243 8,073 10.46- Irrigated Palay 14,405,716 3,253,080 130,383 30,370 22,107 6,428- Raifed Palay 4,562,110 1,486,592 521 249 5,136 1,645Corn 7,770,603 2,611,432 2,249 1,007 1,660 551 9.32- White Corn 2,262,234 1,290,213 1,455 797 759 363- Yellow Corn 5,508,369 1,321,219 794 210 901 188

Major Cereal 'Total 7,351,104 31,626 8,624

Coconut 14,696,298 3,502,011 96,110 62,200 720 270 7.84Coffee 75,454 117,451 81 620 82 60 30.01Sugarcane 25,029,880 432,026 11,250 146 0 0 3.28Banana 8,884,857 442,751 15,867 6,642 3,347 2,042 9.99Calamansi 160,740 20,065 360 420 719 72 19.94Mango 885,038 188,092 557 187 1,241 813 25.16Pinapple 2,507,098 61,643 12,670 1,020 513 42 12.03Sweet Potato 519,855 88,968 1,125 157 751 96 14.99Cassava 2,540,254 216,775 1,970 150 938 110 6.29Eggplant 225,579 21,159 1,759 159 592 70 24.23Peanut 29,196 25,048 19 9 38 56 31.33Tomato 214,573 16,742 6,573 520 159 23 16.48

Other Crops Total 5,186,574 72,284 3,661Total 12,537,678 103,910 12,285

RizalCountryCrop

Laguna

A-48

Page 50: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

添付資料 2-6 Economic Price Calculation of Rice and Corn

1.Thai 5% broken rice, price forecast in nominal US$ in 2030, converted to 2017 constant price (Source: Commodity Market Outlook, April 2017, World Bank)

- Projection in 2030 440 USD/ton - MUV index 2017-2030 1.280 USD/ton - Projection in 2030 by constant price in 2017 344 USD/ton

4.1US$=51,45PHP (Oct./2017) 11.Milling recovery is assumed at 65% for paddy

Economic Price Calculation of Corn

1.USA maize, forecast in nominal US$ in 2030, converted to 2017 constant price (Source: Commodity Market Outlook, April 2017, World Bank) - Projection in 2030 210 USD/ton - MUV index 2017-2030 1.280 USD/ton - Projection in 2030 by constant price in 2017 164 USD/ton 4.1US$=51,45PHP (Oct./2017)

Operation US$/ton PHP/Kg1. Price Forecast of rice, Bangkok, Thailand, f.o.b. 344.02. Quality Adjustment 95 (10% broken) 326.83. Insurance, freight, etc. 30.04. Forecast 2017 c.i.f. price of rice, Manila 356.8

18.365. Port handling, storage and losses 5% + 0.926. Transportation (port to wholesaler) + 1.007. Ex-wholesaler price 20.288. Merketing Margin 10% - 2.039. Local transportation (village to wholesaler) - 1.0010. Value of Milled Rice 17.2511. Conversion of Paddy 65% 11.2112. Milling Cost - 0.5013. Revenue of Rice Bran + 0.7514. Transportation and Stabilization of Rice Bran - 0.5015. Local transportation (farm to village) - 0.5016. Economic farm gate price 10.46

Import Parity

Operation US$/ton IDR/Kg1. Price Forecast of maize, Gulf Ports, USA, f.o.b. 164.02. Insurance, freight, etc. 40.03. Forecast 2017 c.i.f. price of maize, Jakarta 204.0

10.504. Port handling, storage and losses 5% + 0.525. Transportation (port to wholesaler) + 1.006. Ex-wholesaler price 12.027. Merketing Margin 10% - 1.208. Local transportation (village to wholesaler) - 1.009. Local transportation (farm to village) - 0.5010. Economic farm gate price 9.32

Import Parity

A-49

Page 51: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3

Materials Related to Compensation Costs

A-50

Page 52: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-1 Compensation Cost for Land Acquisition for Development of Paranaque Spillway

a1. L

eng

tha2

. Wid

tha3

. Are

ain

ca

se o

f Z

Vin

ca

se o

f M

Vin

ca

se o

f Z

Vin

ca

se o

f M

V

(m)

(m)

(m2

)(P

hP./m

2)

Ye

ar(P

hP./m

2)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

No

.(P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

Ope

n C

hann

elT

agui

gLo

we

r B

icut

an1

,20

08

39

9,3

46

9,4

64

20

19

11

,35

79

40

1,1

28

Sha

ft (

De

part

ing)

Tagu

igLo

we

r B

icut

an8

05

04

,00

09

,46

42

01

91

1,3

57

38

45

Sha

ft (

Arr

ival

) Par

anaq

ueS

an D

ioni

sio

1,0

00

15

,77

22

01

81

8,9

26

16

19

09

03

,41

10

16

19

Tota

l-

--

-1

04

,34

6-

--

99

41

,19

32

80

-2

53

1,2

47

1,4

46

Ope

n C

hann

elM

untin

lupa

Suc

at6

00

83

49

,67

32

4,9

05

20

19

29

,8

86

1,2

37

1,4

85

Sha

ft (

De

part

ing)

Mun

tinlu

paS

ucat

80

50

4,0

00

24

,90

52

01

92

9,8

86

10

01

20

Sha

ft (

Arr

ival

) Las

Pin

asP

ula

ng L

upa

Uno

1,0

00

13

,16

82

01

71

5,8

02

13

16

09

03

,41

10

13

16

Tota

l-

--

-5

4,6

73

--

-1

,35

01

,62

02

90

-2

62

1,6

12

1,8

82

No

te)

a1. W

idth

of

land

acq

uisi

tion

is t

he w

idth

of

chan

ne

l plu

s ad

ditio

nal 1

2m

ne

cess

ary

for

acqu

isiti

on

of

mar

gina

l are

as o

f re

side

ntia

l lo

t.b.

Zo

nal V

alue

(Z

V)

pro

vide

d by

BIR

(B

ure

au o

f In

ternal

Re

venu

e)

, spe

cific

ally

ave

rage

val

ue o

f Z

V in

the

bar

anga

y in

que

stio

n.c.

Mar

ket

Val

ue (

MV

) is

cal

cula

ted

as 1

.2 ti

me

s as

la

rge

as

ZV

fo

r co

nsis

tenc

y w

ith t

he c

ase

of

Mas

ter

Pla

n o

f th

is P

roje

ct.

d. A

vera

ge c

ost

fo

r la

nd a

cqui

sitio

n =

a *

b, o

r a

* c

f. D

ata

of a

vera

ge c

ost

fo

r co

nstr

uctio

n o

f re

side

ntia

l bui

ldin

g (h

ous

e)

liste

d in

a s

tatis

tical

bo

ok

cons

ide

ring

infla

tion.

h. T

ota

l co

st fo

r co

mpe

nsat

ion

= d

+ g

90

3,4

11

26

21

,59

91

,86

62

90

Bar

anga

y

1,4

27

1. L

ow

er

Bic

utan

-P

aran

aque

R.

28

09

03

,41

12

53

1,2

31

Tabl

e C

om

pens

atio

n C

ost

for

Land

Acq

uisi

tio

n fo

r De

velo

pme

nt o

f Par

anaq

ue S

pill

way

Cas

e (

Ro

ute

)F

acili

tyLo

catio

na.

Are

ab.

Zo

nal V

alue

c. M

arke

tV

alue

d. C

ost

for

land

acq

uisi

tion

e. N

umbe

r o

fbu

ildin

gs

f. U

nit

cost

of

resi

dent

ial

build

ing

3. S

ucat

-Z

apo

te R

.

g. R

epl

ace

me

ntco

st f

orre

side

ntia

lbu

ildin

gs

h. T

ota

l cos

t fo

r co

mpe

nsa

tion

City

A-51

Page 53: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-2 Compensation Cost for Tunnel Section under Private Land of Paranaque Spillway Route 2-A

a1. L

eng

tha2

. Wid

tha3

. Are

ain

ca

se o

f Z

Vin

ca

se o

f M

Vin

ca

se o

f Z

Vin

ca

se o

f M

V

(m)

(m)

(m2

)(P

hP./m

2)

Ye

ar(P

hP./m

2)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on PhP

.)

Tunn

el s

ect

ion/

Lagu

na L

ake

side

(S

ucat

)M

untin

lupa

Suc

at2

00

15

.53

,10

02

4,9

05

20

19

29

,88

67

79

31

51

9

Tunn

el s

ect

ion/

Man

ila B

aysi

de (

San

Dio

nisi

o R

ive

r)

Par

anaq

ueS

an D

ioni

sio

32

01

5.5

4,9

60

33

,58

02

01

84

0,2

96

16

72

00

33

40

Tota

l5

20

-8

,06

0-

--

24

42

93

49

59

No

te)

a1. L

eng

th o

f tu

nne

l und

er

priv

ate

land

cal

cula

ted

on

Go

ogl

e E

arth

.a2

. Wid

th o

f pe

rpe

tual

eas

em

ent

is th

e w

idth

of

tun

nel (

13

.5m

) +

2.0

m o

f bu

ffe

r ar

ea.

b. Z

ona

l Val

ue (

ZV

) pr

ovi

ded

by B

IR (

Bur

eau

of

Internal

Re

venu

e)

, spe

cific

ally

ave

rage

val

ue o

f Z

V in

the

bar

anga

y in

que

stio

n.c.

Mar

ket V

alue

(M

V)

is c

alcu

late

d as

1.2

tim

es

as

larg

e a

s Z

V f

or

cons

iste

ncy

with

the

cas

e o

f M

aste

r P

lan

of

this

Pro

ject

.d.

Lav

ue o

f la

nd lo

t = a

* b

, or

a *

ce

. Co

mpe

nsat

ion

cost

fo

r pe

rpe

tual

eas

em

ent

fo

r tu

nne

l co

nstr

uctio

n un

der

priv

ate

land

. Co

mpe

nsat

ion

fo

r st

ruct

ure

s, im

pro

vem

ent

, co

rps

or

tre

es

are

no

t co

nsid

ere

d.

-

Tabl

e C

om

pens

atio

n C

ost

for

Tunn

el S

ect

ion

(< 5

0m

be

low

gro

und

leve

l) u

nde

r P

riva

te L

and

of P

aran

aque

Spi

llw

ay (

Cas

e 2

-A)

Site

Loca

tion

a. A

rea

b. Z

ona

l Val

uec.

Mar

ket

Val

ued.

Val

ue o

f la

nde

. Co

st f

or

com

pens

atio

n

City

Bar

anga

y

A-52

Page 54: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-3 Compensation Cost for Tunnel Section under Private Land of Paranaque Spillway Route

ルート

2-B

Appendix 3-4 Compensation Cost for All Case

a1. L

eng

tha2

. Wid

tha3

. Are

ain

ca

se o

f Z

Vin

ca

se o

f M

Vin

ca

se o

f Z

Vin

ca

se o

f M

V

(m)

(m)

(m2

)(P

hP./m

2)

Ye

ar(P

hP./m

2)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on PhP

.)

Tunn

el s

ect

ion/

Lagu

na L

ake

side

(S

ucat

)M

untin

lupa

Suc

at2

00

15

.53

,10

02

4,9

05

20

19

29

,88

67

79

31

51

9

Par

anaq

ueS

an D

ioni

sio

67

01

5.5

10

,38

53

3,5

80

20

18

40

,29

63

49

41

87

08

4

Ma

nuyo

Dos

1,0

30

15

.51

5,9

65

27

,17

62

01

73

2,6

11

43

45

21

87

10

4P

ula

ng L

upa

Uno

1,6

00

15

.52

4,8

00

20

,47

92

01

72

4,5

75

50

86

09

10

21

22

3,3

00

-5

1,1

50

--

-1

,29

01

,54

92

58

31

0N

ote

)a1

. Le

ngth

of

tunn

el u

nde

r pr

ivat

e la

nd c

alcu

late

d o

n G

oo

gle

Ear

th.

a2. W

idth

of

perp

etu

al e

ase

me

nt is

the

wid

th o

f tu

nne

l (1

3.5

m)

+ 2

.0m

of

buff

er

are

a.b.

Zo

nal V

alue

(Z

V)

pro

vide

d by

BIR

(B

ure

au o

f In

ternal

Re

venu

e)

, spe

cific

ally

ave

rage

val

ue o

f Z

V in

the

bar

anga

y in

que

stio

n.c.

Mar

ket V

alue

(M

V)

is c

alcu

late

d as

1.2

tim

es

as

larg

e a

s Z

V f

or

cons

iste

ncy

with

the

cas

e o

f M

aste

r P

lan

of

this

Pro

ject

.d.

Lav

ue o

f la

nd lo

t = a

* b

, or

a *

ce

. Co

mpe

nsat

ion

cost

fo

r pe

rpe

tual

eas

em

ent

fo

r tu

nne

l co

nstr

uctio

n un

der

priv

ate

land

. Co

mpe

nsat

ion

fo

r st

ruct

ure

s, im

pro

vem

ent

, co

rps

or

tre

es

are

no

t co

nsid

ere

d.

d. V

alue

of

land

e. C

ost

fo

r co

mpe

nsat

ion

Las

Pin

as

Site

Tabl

e

Co

mpe

nsat

ion

Co

st fo

r Tu

nne

l Se

ctio

n (<

50

m be

low

gro

und

leve

l) u

nde

r P

riva

te L

and

of P

aran

aque

Spi

llw

ay (

Cas

e 2

-B )

Loca

tion

City

Bar

anga

yb.

Zo

nal V

alue

c. M

arke

tV

alue

a. A

rea

Tunn

el s

ect

ion/

Man

ila B

aysi

de (

Zao

pote

Riv

er)

Tota

l

in c

ase

of

ZV

in c

ase

of

MV

in c

ase

of

ZV

in c

ase

of

MV

in c

ase

of

ZV

in c

ase

of

MV

in c

ase

of

ZV

in c

ase

of

MV

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on P

hP.)

(milli

on PhP

.)(m

illion

PhP

.)(m

illion

PhP

.)(m

illion

PhP

.)(m

illio

n P

hP.)

1,2

31

1,4

27

1,5

99

1,8

66

1,5

99

1,8

66

15

98

.71

77

51

86

6.0

63

46

16

19

13

16

13

16

13

.16

81

5.8

01

6

00

15

19

15

19

00

00

33

40

25

83

10

00

1,2

47

1,4

46

1,6

61

1,9

40

1,8

85

2,2

10

16

11

.88

57

51

88

1.8

65

06

Tota

l

Tabl

e C

om

pens

atio

n co

st fo

r C

ase

1, C

ase

2-A

,Cas

e2

-B

, Cas

e3

Cas

e 2

-B

Ope

n ch

ann

el/C

haft

(De

part

ing)

Cha

ft (A

riva

l)

Tun

nel s

ect

ion/

La

guna

La

ke s

ide

Tun

nel s

ect

ion/

Ma

nila

Ba

y si

de

Fac

ility

/ Site

Cas

e 1

(2

02

0 V

ers

ion)

Cas

e 3

(2

02

0 V

ers

ion)

Cas

e 2

-A

A-53

Page 55: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-5 Compensation Cost for River Channel Improvement

b. I

mpr

ove

me

ntLe

ngth

Pro

vinc

eC

ity /

Mun

icip

ality

upto

15.

0mc1

. a

vera

geim

prov

em

ent

wid

th

c2.

exi

stin

griv

er

wid

thc3

. c1

- c

2g1

. N

o. o

fH

ouse

hold

s(N

o.)

g2.

Are

a o

fLG

Us

(ha

)

g3.

Ho

us

eh

old

De

ns

ity(N

o./

ha

)

l1.

Ave

rage

Fa

mily

Siz

els

. P

AP

s(N

o.)

Riz

alA

ngo

noA

ngo

no R

ive

rI

1,1

70

36

13

23

2.6

98

71

23

25

,32

52

,62

29

.72

65

33

,99

71

43

74

.51

17

Riz

alTa

ytay

I0

00

NC

RTa

guig

Mag

dao

ng R

ive

rI

39

02

31

01

30

.51

10

,88

65

51

98

,25

64

,52

14

3.9

22

90

3,4

11

20

75

4.1

91

NC

RM

untin

lupa

Ala

bang

Riv

er

I1

,63

03

21

71

52

.45

36

,80

49

001

22

,28

63

,97

53

0.8

75

90

3,4

11

68

96

84

.13

08

Bay

anan

Cre

ek

I6

90

30

10

20

1.3

83

6,8

04

50

81

22

,28

63

,97

53

0.

84

29

03

,41

13

85

46

4.1

17

4P

obl

acio

n R

ive

rI

40

03

01

02

00

.80

36

,80

42

94

12

2,2

86

3,9

75

30

.82

59

03

,41

12

23

17

4.1

10

1M

agda

ong

Riv

er

I6

30

27

12

15

0.9

53

6,8

04

34

81

22

,28

63

,97

53

0.8

29

90

3,4

11

26

37

44

.11

19

SB

-23

-5I

85

03

02

01

00

.85

36

,80

43

13

12

2,2

86

3,9

75

30

.82

69

03

,41

12

43

36

4.1

10

7S

B-2

3-6

I5

20

25

15

10

0.5

23

6,8

04

19

11

22

,28

63

,97

53

0.8

16

90

3,4

11

14

20

64

.16

66

,28

01

0.1

42

,63

32

62

22

72

,86

01

,08

3La

guna

San

Pe

dro

San

Isid

ro R

ive

rII

1,3

40

41

16

25

3.3

53

,48

21

17

73

,03

02

,40

53

0.4

10

26

15

,36

86

31

79

4.5

45

8Tu

nasa

n R

ive

rII

79

03

21

02

21

.74

3,4

82

61

73

,03

02

,40

53

0.4

53

61

5,3

68

32

93

4.5

23

7La

guna

Bin

anS

B-2

0-4

II7

70

39

15

24

1.8

52

,43

44

58

6,7

52

4,3

50

19

.93

76

15

,36

82

36

83

.81

40

Bin

an R

ive

rII

2,8

90

52

30

22

6.3

62

,43

41

55

86

,75

24

,35

01

9.9

12

76

15

,36

87

82

33

3.8

48

2La

guna

San

ta R

osa

Sta

. Ro

sa R

ive

rII

81

05

01

83

22

.59

4,0

68

10

51

01

,38

55

,48

41

8.5

48

61

5,3

68

29

13

53

.51

68

SB

-20

-2II

1,2

40

41

26

15

1.8

64

,06

87

61

01

,38

55

,48

41

8.5

34

61

5,3

68

21

97

3.5

12

0S

B-2

0-3

II1

,01

05

13

02

12

.12

4,0

68

86

10

1,3

85

5,4

84

18

.53

96

15

,36

82

41

10

3.5

13

7La

guna

Cab

uyao

II0

00

Lagu

naC

alam

baS

an J

uan

Riv

er

II1

,50

08

26

02

23

.30

2,4

66

8112

3,0

71

14

,95

08

.22

76

15

,36

81

79

83

.71

01

San

Cri

sto

bal R

ive

rII

1,4

50

71

50

21

3.0

52

,46

67

51

23

,07

11

4,9

50

8.2

25

61

5,3

68

15

91

3.7

93

SB

-17

-6II

71

02

71

31

40

.99

2,4

66

25

12

3,0

71

14

,95

08

.28

61

5,3

68

53

03

.73

0S

B-1

7-7

II7

50

37

15

22

1.6

52

,46

64

11

23

,07

11

4,9

50

8.2

14

61

5,

36

88

49

3.7

50

SB

-17

-8II

1,4

10

47

15

32

4.5

12

,46

61

11

12

3,0

71

14

,95

08

.23

76

15

,36

82

31

34

3.7

13

71

4,6

70

33

.37

97

75

51

33

91

,31

62

,15

4La

guna

Los

Ban

os

Los

Ban

os

Riv

er

III2

,10

05

12

03

16

.51

1,9

21

12

52

9,0

20

5,4

22

5.4

35

61

5,3

68

21

14

63

.91

36

SB

-17

-3III

45

02

41

01

40

.63

1,9

21

12

29

,02

05

,42

25

.43

61

5,3

68

21

43

.91

3S

B-1

7-4

III4

30

33

10

23

0.9

91

,92

11

92

9,0

20

5,4

22

5.4

56

15

,36

83

22

3.9

21

SB

-17

-5III

1,5

50

33

20

13

2.0

21

,92

13

92

9,0

20

5,4

22

5.4

11

61

5,3

68

74

53

.94

2La

guna

Bay

Co

lo R

ive

rIII

1,0

70

32

25

70

.75

1,4

19

11

15

,14

94

,2

66

3.6

36

15

,36

82

12

4.1

11

Lagu

naC

alau

anC

alau

anIII

1,9

70

61

23

38

7.4

96

39

48

17

,66

96

,5

40

2.7

20

61

5,3

68

12

60

4.6

93

SB

-16

-2III

5,2

70

65

10

55

28

.99

63

91

85

17

,66

96

,54

02

.77

86

15

,36

84

82

33

4.6

36

0La

guna

Vic

tori

aP

ilaIII

2,4

10

51

14

37

8.9

21

,06

79

51

0,8

22

2,

23

54

.84

36

15

,36

82

71

22

3.6

15

5La

guna

Pila

SB

-15

-2III

4,7

90

50

20

30

14

.37

63

89

21

1,4

47

3,1

20

3.7

53

61

5,3

68

32

12

44

.42

32

Lagu

naS

anta

Cru

zS

ta. C

ruz

Riv

er

III2

,65

06

96

09

2.3

91

,96

44

72

7,9

82

3,8

59

7.3

17

61

5,3

68

11

57

4.2

73

22

,69

07

3.0

46

72

26

91

65

83

71

,13

64

3,6

40

11

6.5

44

,28

21

,08

17

31

5,0

13

4,3

73

No

te)

a. D

eve

lopm

ent

Pha

se p

ropo

sed

by J

ICA

Sur

vey

Team

.b.

Lo

ngitu

dina

l le

ngth

of

rive

r im

pro

vem

ent

se

ctio

n m

eas

ure

d o

n A

uto

CA

Dc.

Wid

th o

f riv

er

impr

ove

me

nt s

ect

ion

give

n by

JIC

A S

urve

y Te

am.

d. C

alcu

latio

n by

d=

b x

c3e

. Ave

rage

Zo

nal V

alue

cal

cula

ted

by a

ffe

cte

d ba

ran

gay.

f.

Cal

cula

tion

by f=

d x

eg.

Ho

use

hold

de

nsity

is e

stim

ate

d fr

om

num

ber

of

hous

eho

lds

liste

d in

sta

tistic

al b

oo

k in

eac

h LG

U.

h. A

ppro

xim

atio

n by

h=

d x

g3.

i. U

se t

he d

ata

of

ave

rage

co

st fo

r co

nstr

uctio

n o

f r

esi

dent

ial b

uild

ing

(ho

use

) lis

ted

in a

sta

tistic

al b

oo

k co

nsid

eri

ng in

flatio

n.j.

Cal

cula

tion

by j=

h x

ik.

Cal

cula

tion

by k

=f+

jl.

Cal

cula

tion

of P

roje

ct A

ffe

cte

d P

ers

ons

(P

AP

s),

l1 is

ave

rage

fam

ily s

ize

bas

ed

on

a st

atis

tical

bo

ok.

l2=

h x

l1.

Tabl

e

Cal

cula

tion

Res

ult

of

Co

mpe

nsat

ion

Co

st N

ecess

ary

for

Riv

er C

hann

el I

mpr

ove

men

t

l. P

roje

ct A

ffect

ed

Pe

ople

(PA

Ps)

e.

Ave

rage

Zon

al V

alu

e(P

hp./m

2)

f. C

ost

for

Land

Acq

uisi

tion

(milli

on P

hp.)

g. H

ouse

hold

De

nsity

by

LGU

h. N

o. o

fB

uild

ings

inLa

ndA

cqui

sitio

nA

rea

(N

o.)

i. U

nit C

ost

ofR

esi

dent

ial

Bui

ldin

g(P

hp.)

j. R

epl

ace

me

ntC

ost

for

Re

side

ntia

lB

uild

ings

(m

illion

Php

.)

k. T

ota

l(f

+j)

(mill

ion

Php

.)

Loca

tion

Riv

er

Nam

ea

. P

hase

/P

riorit

y

c. W

idth

of

Riv

er

Impr

ove

me

nt (

m)

d. A

rea

of

Land

Acq

uisi

tion

(ha

)

Gra

nd T

ota

l

Sub

-to

tal

Sub

-to

tal

Sub

-to

tal

A-54

Page 56: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-6(1) Zonal Value for LGUs

Average

ProvinceCity /

MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.

Lower Bicutan 9,464 7,500 11,351Bagunbayan 7,263 - 10,421

Average 8,364 7,500 7,500 10,886Sucat 24,905 47,203Buli 14,125 38,192Cupang 28,464 38,764Alabang 20,609 88,944Bayanan 12,692 23,318Putatan 12,738 16,182Poblacion 12,842 20,077Tunasan 13,406 21,750

Average 17,473 36,804Cuyab 3,880 1,000 3,681San Roque 1,763 750 3,047Landayan 3,375 2,750 3,719

Average 3,006 1,500 1,500 3,482Canlalay 3,442 3,661Dela Paz 1,861 875 1,856Malaban 2,214 625 1,786

Average 2,506 750 750 2,434Sinalhan 4,267 1,250 4,318Aplaya 4,600 1,250 4,278Caingin 4,083 1,250 3,607

Average 4,317 1,250 1,250 4,068Bigaa 3,186 625 2,486Butong 3,071 875 2,518Marinig 2,413 875 2,070Gulod 2,543 875 2,111Baclaran 2,300 875 1,965Maratid 2,582 875 2,432

Average 2,683 833 833 2,264Uwisan 2,425 400 310 1,474Looc 2,637 425 325 2,264Sampirulhan 2,660 500 325 2,086Palingon 1,867 550 367 1,380Lingga 2,600 475 367 1,881Lecheria 3,870 975 950 3,542Halang 3,969 738 638 3,366Bucal 3,876 767 438 3,359Pansol 3,613 988 788 3,229Sucol 3,381 575 400 2,679Masili 2,425 550 425 1,867

Average 3,029 631 485 558 2,466Tadlac 2,775 425 300 255 1,437Bambang 2,990 850 700 600 2,362Malinta 2,750 350 300 213 2,208Mayondon 2,750 425 340 255 1,873Bayog 2,375 750 650 600 1,725

Average 2,728 560 458 385 468 1,921Sto. Domingo 2,093 785 1,353San Antonio 3,106 393 2,463Tagumpay 800 800 442

Average 2,000 659 659 1,419Lamot 1 800 250 573Lamot 2 910 67 704

Average 855 159 159 639San Benito 867 229 602San Felix 1,000 283 672San Roque 1,792 325 1,456Nanhaya 1,850 467 1,700Pagalangan 925 598 907

Average 1,287 380 380 1,067Aplaya 825 250 400Bagong Pook 1,663 397 875

Average 1,244 324 324 638Duhat 1,778 450 1,255Gatid 2,118 522 1,118Bagumbayan 2,269 538 1,685Callios 3,125 550 2,919Santo Angel Norte 1,425 403 912Santisma Cruz 4,876 442 5,178San Pablo Norte 2,875 370 1,355San Pablo Sur 2,925 486 1,287

Average 2,674 470 470 1,964

I

I

MetroManila

MetroManila

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Cabuyao II 2019/6/13

Calamba II 2017/10/15

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Los Banos II 2017/10/15

Bay III 2017/10/15

Calauan III 2017/10/15

Santa Cruz III 2017/10/15

Victoria III 2017/10/15

Location

PhaseResidential

Regular (RR)

Agricultural (A)Effective Date(up-to-date)

Baragay

Laguna Pila III 2017/10/15

2019/7/11

2019/7/11

Santa Rosa I 2019/6/13

San Pedro

Binan

I

I

2020/1/3

2019/6/13

Taguig

Muntinlupa

A-55

Page 57: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-6(2) Zonal Value for LGUs

Average

ProvinceCity /

MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.

Binan 395 20 30 25 338Sampaloc 350 21 21 320San Isidro 400 200 86 143 370Average 382 110 46 78 343

Maytalang II 815 40 221Wawa 395 26 211Poblacion 815 40 805Bagong Silang 770 35 518

Average 699 35 35 439San Juan 626 30 23 45 33 589Longos 667 38 20 43 34 560

Average 647 34 22 44 33 575Ibada del Sur 375 68 344Ibada del Norte 375 68 322

Average 375 68 68 333Baño 451 13 433Burgos 438 16 287Saray 50 5 20Taft 408 14 317Banilan 200 11 74Kabulusan 175 49 112Matikim 130 19 56Casimsim 110 20 50

Average 245 18 18 169Balian 350 75 264Poblacion 350 17 361Sulib 210 16 140Dambo 175 75 119Asufre 175 59 98

Average 252 48 48 196Laguio 495 13 254

Average 495 13 13 254RR A26 A4 A48 A5 Ae.

240 8 11 11 11 10 168Average 240 8 11 11 11 10 168

Lambac 350 33 278Numero 83 19 51

Average 217 26 26 165Bagumbong 475 150 100 432Lubo 490 150 100 489Pagkalinawan 480 150 100 450Palaypalay 475 100 100 423Punta 575 150 100 414Bayugo 490 150 100 425Poblacion-1st district 527 150 100 538Poblacion-2st district 533 150 100 531Poblacion-3st district 500 150 100 503Sipsipin 500 150 100 447

Average 505 145 100 123 465Malaya 911 150 100 838Niogan 914 150 120 821Quisao 838 150 120 783Halayhayin 919 150 100 896Wawa 765 150 120 746Takungan 762 150 120 831

Average 852 150 113 132 819Plaza-Aldea 1,746 150 100 1,910Wawa 1,391 150 100 1,365San Isidro 1,695 150 100 1,702Kaybuto 1,742 150 100 1,737

Average 1,644 150 100 125 1,679Evangelista 861 200 150 735Mabini 870 200 100 797

Average 866 200 125 163 7662015/5/8

2002/12/28FamyLaguna

Laguna Siniloan

Butuhan

Paete 2002/12/28

Laguna Pangil 2002/12/28

2002/12/28PakilLaguna

Pagsanjan 2002/12/28

Laguna

Laguna

Rizal

Rizal

Laguna

Laguna

Rizal

Rizal

Laguna

Mabitac 2002/12/28

2015/5/8Jaly-jala

Baras

2002/12/28

Lumban 2002/12/28

Kalayaan 2002/12/28

2015/5/8Pililla

Tanay 2015/5/8

Location

PhaseResidential

Regular (RR)

Agricultural (A)Effective Date(up-to-date)

Baragay

A-56

Page 58: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-6(3) Zonal Value for LGUs

Average

ProvinceCity /

MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.

San Pedro 1,088 150 120 1,160Bombongan 1,700 150 120 774

Average 1,394 150 120 135 967Calahan 1,121 150 130 100 949Patunhay 963 200 100 819Dalig 789 130 100 688Looc 954 150 100 943Sampad 240 100 50 200Nagsulo 250 100 50 125Ticulio 225 75 50 163

Average 649 129 130 79 113 555Pipindan 478 100 100 388Kalinawan 240 100 50 181Ithan 288 100 50 236Pila-pila 1,065 400 200 970Lunsad 741 100 90 666Libid 1,658 300 200 1,901Calumpang 1,330 150 80 1,362Pantok 1,638 600 500 1,593Palangoy 1,757 850 650 1,729Bilibiran 1,988 150 100 1,859Tagpos 1,967 100 100 1,625San Carlos 2,529 2,567Tayuman 1,971 300 200 1,958Pag-asa 1,753 200 100 1,680

Average 1,386 265 186 226 1,337Kalayaan 887 400 400 864San Vincente 921 400 300 917Bagumbayan 894 300 - 832

Average 901 367 350 358 871Muzon 1,011 150 1,223

Average 1,011 150 150 1,223Source: Website of Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR)

Rizal Morong 2015/5/8

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

2015/5/8

Binagonan 2015/5/8

2015/5/8Cardona

2015/5/8ITaytay

Angono I

Location

PhaseResidential

Regular (RR)

Agricultural (A)Effective Date(up-to-date)

Baragay

A-57

Page 59: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-7 Compensation Cost for Lakeshore Diking System

Pro

vinc

eC

ity /

Mun

icip

ality

c1.

Bui

lt-up

c2.

Agr

icul

tura

lc3

.F

ishp

ond

c4.

Oth

ers

c5.

Tot

al

d1.

RR

d2.

A

e1.

Re

sid

en

tial

Are

a

e2.

Ag

ricu

ltura

lA

rea

e4.

Tot

al

f1.

(No

./2,

500

m2)

f2.

(No

./2,

500

m2)

f3.

(No

./2,

500

m2)

f4. A

ve.

(No

./2,

500m

2)

f5.

Ave

.(N

o./h

a)

k1.

Ave

rage

Fa

mily

Siz

ek2

. P

AP

s(N

os.)

Riz

alA

ngo

noI

3,3

10

0.8

3.8

0.0

32

0.6

32

5.2

90

13

58

71

42

13

51

93

63

0.0

12

09

25

33

,99

74

97

04

.54

15

Riz

alTa

ytay

I1

,35

00

.03

1.9

0.0

51

.98

3.9

1,0

11

15

00

48

48

35

19

36

30

.01

20

05

33

,99

70

48

4.3

0N

CR

Tagu

igI

2,4

90

0.0

0.0

0.0

27

.02

7.0

8,3

64

7,5

00

00

09

49

47

35

.01

40

09

03

,41

10

04

.10

NC

RM

untin

lupa

I9

,87

00

.50

.00

.02

7.0

27

.51

7,4

73

94

09

49

49

47

35

.01

40

75

90

3,4

11

68

16

24

.13

09

17

,02

01

.33

5.7

0.0

42

6.5

46

3.6

10

16

11

63

16

81

17

28

07

25

Lagu

naS

an P

edr

oII

4,0

80

0.2

0.0

0.0

26

.62

6.8

3,0

06

1,5

00

50

52

55

13

73

7.7

15

12

56

15

,36

81

52

04

.51

12

Lagu

naB

inan

II4

,66

01

.61

.20

.03

7.9

40

.82

,50

67

50

41

95

12

55

13

73

7.7

15

12

49

61

5,3

68

15

32

04

3.8

94

4La

guna

San

ta R

osa

II5

,78

01

.70

.00

.02

6.4

28

.04

,31

75

45

73

07

32

55

13

73

7.7

15

12

54

61

5,3

68

15

62

29

3.5

88

9La

guna

Cab

uyao

II8

,39

01

.10

.00

.08

4.0

85

.11

83

88

33

19

01

94

32

92

53

2.3

12

91

37

61

5,3

68

84

10

43

.85

20

Lagu

naC

alam

baII

9,9

20

1.4

10

.80

.03

6.6

48

.83

,02

95

58

42

60

10

24

32

92

53

2.3

12

91

80

61

5,3

68

11

12

13

3.7

66

73

2,8

30

6.0

12

.00

.02

11

.52

29

.51

81

70

25

08

45

52

07

70

3,1

34

Lagu

naLo

s B

ano

sIII

8,2

40

3.3

2.8

0.0

11

.11

7.2

2,7

28

46

89

01

31

03

43

29

25

32

.31

29

42

66

15

,36

82

62

36

53

.91

,66

1La

guna

Bay

III3

,78

01

.91

7.8

0.0

9.0

28

.62

,00

06

59

37

11

71

54

28

17

13

19

.37

71

44

61

5,3

68

89

24

34

.15

92

Lagu

naC

alau

anIII

84

00

.01

5.0

0.0

1.8

16

.88

55

15

90

24

24

28

17

13

19

.37

70

61

5,3

68

02

44

.60

Lagu

naV

icto

ria

III6

,47

00

.43

3.2

0.0

28

.46

1.9

1,2

87

38

05

12

61

31

28

17

13

19

.37

72

96

15

,36

81

81

49

3.6

10

4La

guna

Pila

III4

,75

00

.72

4.7

0.0

31

.65

6.9

1,2

44

32

48

80

88

28

17

13

19

.37

75

36

15

,36

83

21

21

4.4

23

2La

guna

San

ta C

ruz

III8

,82

02

.21

24

.50

.09

6.8

22

3.5

2,6

74

47

05

85

85

64

32

81

71

31

9.3

77

16

76

15

,36

81

03

74

64

.27

03

32

,90

08

.42

17

.90

.01

78

.64

05

.01

98

94

61

,14

48

19

50

41

,64

83

,29

38

2,7

50

15

.62

65

.70

.08

16

.71

,09

8.0

48

01

,07

71

,55

71

,83

21

,14

22

,69

97

,15

1La

guna

Pag

sanj

an1

,16

00

.01

3.8

0.0

0.0

13

.83

82

25

10

35

35

18

18

21

19

.07

60

61

5,3

68

03

54

.30

Lagu

naLu

mba

n8

,90

00

.15

23

.90

.04

02

.49

26

.46

99

35

11

85

18

51

81

82

11

9.0

76

86

15

,36

85

19

04

.23

3La

guna

Kal

ayaa

n3

,84

00

.45

6.3

0.0

9.1

65

.86

47

33

31

92

11

81

82

11

9.0

76

33

61

5,3

68

21

42

4.5

15

0La

guna

Pae

te2

,73

00

.04

9.9

0.0

11

.26

1.0

37

56

80

34

34

18

18

21

19

.07

60

61

5,3

68

03

44

.50

Lagu

naP

akil

6,3

00

0.5

91

.00

.02

1.1

11

2.6

24

51

81

17

18

18

18

21

19

.07

63

56

15

,36

82

24

04

.51

58

Lagu

naP

angi

l4

,26

00

.51

35

.00

.01

4.2

14

9.7

25

24

81

65

67

18

18

21

19

.07

64

26

15

,36

82

69

24

.41

83

Lagu

naS

inilo

an1

,59

00

.05

5.2

0.0

7.2

62

.34

95

00

00

18

18

21

19

.07

60

61

5,3

68

00

4.5

0La

guna

Fam

y6

00

0.0

20

.60

.06

.62

7.3

24

01

00

22

18

18

21

19

.07

60

61

5,3

68

02

4.0

0La

guna

Mab

itac

4,9

60

0.1

16

3.4

0.0

7.8

17

1.3

21

72

60

42

43

18

18

21

19

.07

66

61

5,3

68

44

74

.52

8R

izal

Jala

-jal

a2

3,3

10

2.8

29

.10

.29

1.0

12

3.1

50

51

23

14

36

5018

18

21

19

.07

62

15

53

3,9

97

11

51

65

4.7

1,0

09

Riz

alP

ililla

17

,32

04

.21

31

.30

.01

5.0

15

0.5

85

21

32

36

17

32

09

18

18

21

19

.07

63

21

53

3,9

97

17

13

80

4.4

1,4

12

Riz

alTa

nay

4,5

30

1.2

41

.30

.02

8.5

71

.11

,64

41

25

20

52

72

18

18

21

19

.07

69

45

33

,99

75

01

22

4.6

43

3R

izal

Bar

as3

,29

00

.21

15

.60

.01

3.1

12

9.0

86

61

63

21

88

19

01

81

82

11

9.0

76

19

53

3,9

97

10

20

04

.17

6R

izal

Mo

rong

5,6

70

0.2

24

5.1

0.0

35

.02

80

.41

,39

41

35

33

31

33

418

18

21

19

.07

61

65

33

,99

79

34

34

.47

3R

izal

Car

dona

13

,11

01

.41

.90

.01

12

.01

15

.26

49

11

39

21

11

81

82

11

9.0

76

10

35

33

,99

75

56

64

.04

13

Riz

alB

inan

gona

n1

9,1

10

16

.94

9.8

0.0

36

1.4

42

8.1

1,3

86

22

62

34

11

23

46

35

19

36

30

.01

20

2,0

24

53

3,9

97

1,0

81

1,4

27

4.0

8,0

96

12

0,6

80

28

.61

72

3.2

0.2

11

35

.52

,88

7.5

32

51

,29

21

,61

72

,91

61

,56

73

,18

41

2,0

64

20

3,4

30

44

.31

98

8.9

0.2

19

52

.23

,98

5.5

80

52

,36

93

,17

44

,74

82

,70

95

,88

31

9,2

16

No

te)

a. D

eve

lopm

ent

Pha

se p

ropo

sed

by J

ICA

Sur

vey

Team

.b.

Le

ngth

of

the

Pro

pose

d La

kesh

ore

Dik

e d

elin

eat

ed

on

Go

ogl

e E

arth

.c.

Are

a ca

lcul

ate

d o

n G

IS. C

lass

ifica

tion

of l

and

use

co

mpi

led

by D

epa

rtm

ent

of A

gric

ultu

re is

use

d w

ith

adj

ustm

ent

. c4

. oth

ers

(no

n-pr

odu

ctiv

e la

nd u

se)

incl

ude

s gr

ass

land

, bus

h, fo

rest

s, e

tc.

d. C

alcu

latio

n o

f la

nd p

rice

by

land

use

in e

ach

LGU

bas

ed

on

the

Zo

nal V

alue

pro

vide

d by

BIR

(B

ure

au

of

Inte

rnal

Re

venu

e)

e

. Cal

cula

tion

is d

one

as

follo

ws:

e1

=c1

x d

1, e

2=

(c2

+c3

) x

d2, e

4=

e1

+e

2f.

Est

imat

ion

is d

one

as

follo

ws:

1)

Se

t a

squa

re w

ith a

siz

e o

f 50

m b

y 5

0m

(un

it ar

ea)

on

repr

ese

ntat

ive

loca

tion

(3 s

ites

in e

ach

are

a). 2

) C

alcu

late

the

no

. of b

uild

ings

in e

ach

squa

re. 3

) A

vera

ge t

he

thre

e s

ets

of d

ata

and

conv

ert

it to

no

./ha

as a

n a

vera

ge v

alue

.g.

Num

ber

of a

ffe

cte

d bu

ildin

gs lo

cate

d w

ithin

the

la

kesi

de a

rea

of t

he p

ropo

sed

Lake

sho

re D

ike

. g=

c1

x f4

h. U

se th

e d

ata

of a

vera

ge c

ost

for

cons

truc

tion

of

re

side

ntia

l bui

ldin

g (h

ous

e)

liste

d in

a s

tatis

tical

bo

ok

cons

ide

ring

infla

tion.

i. R

epl

ace

me

nt c

ost

for

affe

cte

d bu

ildin

gs. i

=g

x h

j. j=

e4

+i

k. C

alcu

latio

n o

f P

roje

ct A

ffe

cte

d P

ers

ons

(P

AP

s),

k1 is

ave

rage

fam

ily s

ize

bas

ed

on

a st

atis

tical

bo

ok.

K2

=g

x k1

.

Tabl

e :

Cal

cula

tion

Res

ult

of

Co

mpe

nsat

ion

Co

st N

ecess

ary

for

Land

Acq

uisi

tion

and

Affe

cted

Bui

ldin

gs f

or

Dik

e C

ons

truct

ion

k. P

roje

ct A

ffect

ed

Pe

op

le(P

AP

s)

Sub

-to

tal

Loca

tion

a.

Pha

se /

Prio

rity

b. L

en

gth

of

Lake

sh

ore

Dik

e (

m)

c. A

rea

s by

land

use

with

in la

kesi

de o

f La

kesh

ore

Dik

e(h

a)

d. Z

ona

l Va

lue

(Php

./m2)

e.

Cos

t fo

r La

nd A

cqui

sitio

n (m

illion

Php

.)f.

No.

of

Bui

ldin

gs/ U

nit

Are

a (

No.

/ha

)g.

No.

of

Bui

ldin

gs(N

os.)

h. U

nit

Cos

tof

Re

side

ntia

lB

uild

ing

(Php

.)

j. T

ota

l(e

4+i)

(milli

on P

hp.)

i. R

ep

lace

me

nt

Co

st

for

Re

sid

en

tial

Bu

ildin

gs

(milli

on

Ph

p.)

Sub

-to

tal

Sub

-to

tal

Sub

-to

tal

Tota

l fo

r P

rio

rity

Are

a (I

+II+

III)

Gra

nd T

ota

l

A-58

Page 60: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-8(1) Zonal Value for LGUs

Average

ProvinceCity /

MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.

Lower Bicutan 9,464 7,500 11,351Bagunbayan 7,263 - 10,421

Average 8,364 7,500 7,500 10,886

Sucat 24,905 47,203

Buli 14,125 38,192

Cupang 28,464 38,764

Alabang 20,609 88,944

Bayanan 12,692 23,318

Putatan 12,738 16,182

Poblacion 12,842 20,077

Tunasan 13,406 21,750

Average 17,473 36,804

Cuyab 3,880 1,000 3,681

San Roque 1,763 750 3,047

Landayan 3,375 2,750 3,719

Average 3,006 1,500 1,500 3,482

Canlalay 3,442 3,661

Dela Paz 1,861 875 1,856

Malaban 2,214 625 1,786

Average 2,506 750 750 2,434

Sinalhan 4,267 1,250 4,318

Aplaya 4,600 1,250 4,278

Caingin 4,083 1,250 3,607

Average 4,317 1,250 1,250 4,068

Bigaa 3,186 625 2,486

Butong 3,071 875 2,518

Marinig 2,413 875 2,070

Gulod 2,543 875 2,111

Baclaran 2,300 875 1,965

Maratid 2,582 875 2,432

Average 2,683 833 833 2,264

Uwisan 2,425 400 310 1,474

Looc 2,637 425 325 2,264

Sampirulhan 2,660 500 325 2,086

Palingon 1,867 550 367 1,380

Lingga 2,600 475 367 1,881

Lecheria 3,870 975 950 3,542

Halang 3,969 738 638 3,366

Bucal 3,876 767 438 3,359

Pansol 3,613 988 788 3,229

Sucol 3,381 575 400 2,679

Masili 2,425 550 425 1,867

Average 3,029 631 485 558 2,466

Tadlak 2,775 425 300 255 1,437

Bambang 2,990 850 700 600 2,362

Malinta 2,750 350 300 213 2,208

Mayondon 2,750 425 340 255 1,873

Bayog 2,375 750 650 600 1,725

Average 2,728 560 458 385 468 1,921

Sto. Domingo 2,093 785 1,353

San Antonio 3,106 393 2,463

Tagumpay 800 800 442

Average 2,000 659 659 1,419

Lamot 1 800 250 573

Lamot 2 910 67 704

Average 855 159 159 639

Table: BIR Zonal Value by LGU

LocationPhase

ResidentialRegular(RR)

Agricultural (A)Effective Date (up-

to-date)Baragay

2019/7/11

2019/7/11

Santa Rosa I 2019/6/13

San Pedro

Binan

I

I

2020/1/3

2019/6/13

Taguig

Muntinlupa

Los Banos II 2017/10/15

Bay III 2017/10/15

Calauan III 2017/10/15

Laguna

Laguna

2019/6/13

Calamba II 2017/10/15

I

I

MetroManila

MetroManila

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Cabuyao II

A-59

Page 61: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-8(2) Zonal Value for LGUs

Average

ProvinceCity /

MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.

San Benito 867 229 602

San Felix 1,000 283 672

San Roque 1,792 325 1,456

Nanhaya 1,850 467 1,700

Pagalangan 925 598 907

Average 1,287 380 380 1,067

Aplaya 825 250 400

Bagong Pook 1,663 397 875

Average 1,244 324 324 638

Duhat 1,778 450 1,255

Gatid 2,118 522 1,118

Bagumbayan 2,269 538 1,685

Callios 3,125 550 2,919Santo Angel Norte 1,425 403 912

Santisima Cruz 4,876 442 5,178San Pablo Norte 2,875 370 1,355

San Pablo Sur 2,925 486 1,287

Average 2,674 470 470 1,964

Binan 395 20 30 25 338

Sampaloc 350 21 21 320

San Isidro 400 200 86 143 370

Average 382 110 46 78 343

Maytalang II 815 40 221

Wawa 395 26 211

Poblacion 815 40 805

Bagong Silang 770 35 518

Average 699 35 35 439

San Juan 626 30 23 45 33 589

Longos 667 38 20 43 34 560

Average 647 34 22 44 33 575

Ibada del Sur 375 68 344

Ibada del Norte 375 68 322

Average 375 68 68 333

Baño 451 13 433

Burgos 438 16 287

Saray 50 5 20

Taft 408 14 317

Banilan 200 11 74

Kabulusan 175 49 112

Matikim 130 19 56

Casimsim 110 20 50

Average 245 18 18 169

Balian 350 75 264

Poblacion 350 17 361

Sulib 210 16 140

Dambo 175 75 119

Asufre 175 59 98

Average 252 48 48 196

Laguio 495 13 254

Average 495 13 13 254

RR A26 A4 A48 A5 Ae.

240 8 11 11 11 10 168

Average 240 8 11 11 11 10 168

Lambac 350 33 278

Numero 83 19 51

Average 217 26 26 165

Bagumbong 475 150 100 432

Lubo 490 150 100 489

Pagkalinawan 480 150 100 450

Palaypalay 475 100 100 423

Punta 575 150 100 414

Bayugo 490 150 100 425Poblacion-1st district 527 150 100 538Poblacion-2st district 533 150 100 531Poblacion-3st district 500 150 100 503

Sipsipin 500 150 100 447

Average 505 145 100 123 465

LocationPhase

ResidentialRegular(RR)

Agricultural (A)Effective Date (up-

to-date)Baragay

Laguna Pila III 2017/10/15

Santa Cruz III 2017/10/15

Victoria III 2017/10/15

2002/12/28

Lumban 2002/12/28

Kalayaan 2002/12/28

Mabitac 2002/12/28

2015/5/8Jala-jala

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Laguna

Rizal

Laguna

Laguna

Butuhan

Paete 2002/12/28

Laguna Pangil 2002/12/28

2002/12/28PakilLaguna

PagsanjanLaguna 2002/12/28

2002/12/28FamyLaguna

Laguna Siniloan

A-60

Page 62: APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS - JICA

Appendix 3-8(3) Zonal Value for LGUs

Average

ProvinceCity /

MunicipalityA1 A2 A4 A50 Ave.

Malaya 911 150 100 838

Niogan 914 150 120 821

Quisao 838 150 120 783

Halayhayin 919 150 100 896

Wawa 765 150 120 746

Takungan 762 150 120 831

Average 852 150 113 132 819

Plaza-Aldea 1,746 150 100 1,910

Wawa 1,391 150 100 1,365

San Isidro 1,695 150 100 1,702

Kaybuto 1,742 150 100 1,737

Average 1,644 150 100 125 1,679

Evangelista 861 200 150 735

Mabini 870 200 100 797

Average 866 200 125 163 766

San Pedro 1,088 150 120 1,160

Bombongan 1,700 150 120 774

Average 1,394 150 120 135 967

Calahan 1,121 150 130 100 949

Patunhay 963 200 100 819

Dalig 789 130 100 688

Looc 954 150 100 943

Sampad 240 100 50 200

Nagsulo 250 100 50 125

Ticulio 225 75 50 163

Average 649 129 130 79 113 555

Pipindan 478 100 100 388

Kalinawan 240 100 50 181

Ithan 288 100 50 236

Pila-pila 1,065 400 200 970

Lunsad 741 100 90 666

Libid 1,658 300 200 1,901

Calumpang 1,330 150 80 1,362

Pantok 1,638 600 500 1,593

Palangoy 1,757 850 650 1,729

Bilibiran 1,988 150 100 1,859

Tagpos 1,967 100 100 1,625

San Carlos 2,529 2,567

Tayuman 1,971 300 200 1,958

Pag-asa 1,753 200 100 1,680

Average 1,386 265 186 226 1,337

Kalayaan 887 400 400 864

San Vincente 921 400 300 917

Bagumbayan 894 300 - 832

Average 901 367 350 358 871

Muzon 1,011 150 1,223

Average 1,011 150 150 1,223

Source: Website of Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR)

LocationPhase

ResidentialRegular(RR)

Agricultural (A)Effective Date (up-

to-date)Baragay

2015/5/8ITaytay

2015/5/8Pililla

Tanay 2015/5/8

Angono I 2015/5/8

Binagonan 2015/5/8

2015/5/8Cardona

Baras

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

Rizal

2015/5/8

Rizal Morong 2015/5/8

A-61